Abstract
The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents the leading cause of viral bronchiolitis and pneumonia in children worldwide and is associated with high morbidity, hospitalization rate, and significant mortality rates. The immune response elicited by RSV is one of the main factors contributing to the pathogenesis of the disease. Two subsets of the cellular immune response, the T helper 17 cell (Th17) and the regulatory T-cell (Treg), and more particularly the balance between these two subsets, might play a significant role in the pathogenesis of the RSV infection. The developmental pathways of Th17 and Treg cells are closely and reciprocally interconnected and plasticity has been demonstrated from Treg toward Th17. During an RSV infection, the functions of both subsets are opposed to one another regarding viral clearance and clinical severity. Th17 and Treg cells offer a promising new view on the pathogenesis of an RSV infection and deserve further exploration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of viral bronchiolitis and pneumonia in children worldwide. Seventy percent of the children are infected in their first year of life, reaching up to 100% in the second year of life (1). Most frequently, the clinical picture consists of mild upper respiratory tract symptoms, while up to 40% will present with lower respiratory tract infections, most frequently bronchiolitis (2). RSV infections are the most important reason for hospitalization in children with respiratory symptoms, of whom 1–2% require transfer to an intensive care unit with an associated mortality rate up to 10% (1,2). Fortunately, mortality merely related to bronchiolitis is rare (0.13%) and in most fatal cases underlying cardiac, respiratory and/or immunological diseases are present (2,3).
RSV RNA encodes 11 proteins, including two nonstructural proteins NS1 and NS2, a surface attachment glycoprotein G and a surface fusion glycoprotein F (4,5). Protein F mediates the fusion between the virus and the host cell membrane and as such promotes formation of syncytia, giving the virus its name (1). Protein G is responsible for binding cell surface glycosaminoglycans and is necessary for in vivo viral replication (4).
It is generally accepted that an RSV infection is a multifactorial process, including genetic constitution, environmental factors, lung epithelium-related factors, and immunological responses. Disease severity has been correlated with specific viral genotypes: variability in the aforementioned G protein could have implications on the virulence of the individual virus. Another important factor is the genetic susceptibility of the host; several genetic markers that predispose to a more severe clinical picture have been identified including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and RANTES. Finally, the age at infection, and thus lung maturity, is also seen as a parameter defining disease severity (6). All of these elements could have their role in defining the eventual polarization and cytokine profile of the immune response following RSV infection.
RSV possesses the ability to avoid the normal immune memory resulting in the possibility to reinfect the patient with the same strain (1,7). Both innate and acquired immune responses are essential for an effective viral clearance. The humoral response is important in the protective immunity against RSV infections as antibodies hamper the infection. However, once infection is established, an effective B-cell response with efficient neutralizing antibodies is absent (7). Therefore, RSV clearance is brought about predominantly by a cellular T-cell response (2,7). Naive T-cells will differentiate into specific T-cell subsets depending on the presenting stimulus and the immunological environment. The balance between different T-cell subsets sets the stage for the acquired immunological response. Initially, the induction of mainly T helper 2 (Th2) cells rather than T helper 1 (Th1) cells, deregulating the Th1/Th2 balance, was put forward as an explanatory theory to predict the severity of an RSV infection (1,8). However, more recently, evidence has been presented pointing to the role of two other T-cell subsets determining the nature of the immunological response and therefore the severity of the RSV infection, namely the interleukin (IL) 17 producing T helper 17 cells (Th17) and regulatory T-cells (Treg). The balance between Th17 and Treg cells has been suggested in the setting of several autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and inflammatory bowel disease (9,10). Their importance will be this review’s main emphasis.
Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells, and RSV
In the 1960s, the development of a formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) vaccine failed in human trials as it resulted in exacerbated disease and increased need for ventilatory support during subsequent natural RSV infection (11). As a predominant Th2 response was demonstrated in these cases, the imbalance between Th1 and Th2 cells became an important model to explain the differences in clinical severity in individual RSV infections (8). The most desirable T helper response following an RSV infection is of the Th1 type, due to its production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), TNF-α and IL-2, thus activating cytotoxic T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells leading to efficient viral clearance (1,12). When, however, a Th2 immune memory is generated following an infection or vaccination, a more pronounced and even detrimental inflammatory response will arise upon renewed contact with RSV, due to the secretion of IL-4 and IL-5 by Th2 cells. In addition, the Th1 and Th2 responses are known to downregulate each other’s activation, as will be described below (13). For these reasons, a dominant Th2 response will result in an inefficient viral clearance and increased disease severity (1,8,12). It has been demonstrated in mice that the T-cell response is biased toward Th1 when primed by the RSV F protein, while the G protein primes toward the Th2 response (14,15). RSV’s NS1 protein inhibits differentiation of Th1, Th2 (and Th17) cells. The NS2 protein inhibits differentiation of Th2 (and Th17) (16). Another skewing of the Th1/Th2 response is present when primary RSV infection occurs at the neonatal age: a Th2 rather than the appropriate Th1 response will develop upon reinfection, while this is not seen in adults (17).
Arguments for an imbalance in the Th1 and Th2 responses during severe RSV infections were indeed provided by some studies, demonstrating on the one hand a Th2 predominance with increased IL-4 concentrations in serum or nasopharyngeal aspirates of RSV infected children and on the other hand a decreased Th1 response with decreased IFN-γ concentrations in serum or nasopharyngeal aspirates (12,18,19,20). An increased IL-4/IFN-γ ratio correlated with an increased severity of the infection (12).
However, the Th1/Th2 balance, as explanatory model for the pathogenesis of the RSV infection, is not absolute and has been contradicted by several human studies in which a Th2 predominance (21,22,23,24,25) and/or a decreased Th1 response (22,23,25) were not confirmed, implying that different mechanisms are involved in the immune-mediated events during severe RSV bronchiolitis.
Treg Cells
Main Characteristics
Treg cells are immunoregulating cells that express the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) (26). Their principal action is to maintain the immunological equilibrium, thus contributing to the body’s homeostasis, by avoiding excessive effector T-cell activation and tissue damage during induced immune responses against infections (27,28,29). The Treg cells exert this function by production of the inhibitory cytokines IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) (27,30,31), by interference with T-cell survival through IL-2 depletion (27,32) and by secretion of molecules that directly eliminate effector cells (27) and inhibit antigen-presenting cell maturation and functionality (27,31,33).
Treg Cells During RSV Infection
Shortly after RSV infection, Foxp3+ Treg cells accumulate in the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes in mice (34). This corresponds with a pronounced reduction of peripheral blood Treg cells in infants with a severe RSV infection, which could be explained by an increased recruitment to the lungs and lung-draining lymph nodes, increased apoptosis, and/or increased plasticity to effector-like phenotypes (35).
The effects of depletion of Treg cells were described in several murine studies. Firstly, a less efficient viral clearance due to a delayed recruitment of RSV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic cells to the lungs was demonstrated. This was accompanied by a delayed exacerbation and a slower recovery. However, no difference in the final viral clearance was seen postinfection as it was achieved completely in both the controls and, albeit slower, in the Treg-depleted mice (34,36,37). Loebbermann et al. (38) on the other hand, did describe a decrease in viral load when depleting Treg cells in mice. These findings can be explained by the fact that during an RSV infection, Treg cells are responsible for early recruitment of activated CD8+ cytotoxic cells out of the draining lymph nodes to the lungs (37). When the Treg response is inhibited, delayed migration of the CD8+ T-cells out of the peripheral lymph nodes results in delayed viral clearance and increased disease severity (34). In conclusion, Treg cells by no means hinder the viral clearance of RSV and may even facilitate the process (34,36,37).
Secondly, a significant increase of the influx and persistence of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells—despite their delayed recruitment—as well as a greater influx of eosinophils was demonstrated in the airways of the Treg-depleted mice. Combined with an observed splenomegaly due to proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, this suggests a systemic inflammatory response and an excessive RSV-specific T-cell response in Treg-depleted mice. In this setting, the abundant presence of CD8+ T-cells may surpass their contribution to effective viral clearance and may lead to tissue pathology and an increased disease severity, due to an increased, unrestrained production of TNF-α and IFN-γ by the CD8+ T-cells (34,39).
Thirdly, spontaneously developing Th2-type pathologies were described in Treg-depleted mice as Treg cells not only control the immunological environment in order to avoid excessive inflammatory T-cell responses, but also aid to limit inefficient Th2-type immune responses (39). In contrast to depleting Treg cells, stimulating the Treg cells in function and numbers by using IL-2/anti-IL-2 immune complexes limits lung inflammation and disease severity without preventing viral clearance (38).
In IL-10 knockout mice, RSV induced greater disease severity, increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, increased lung pathology and an increase in the virus-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells (40,41). IL-10 receptor (IL10R) blockade with anti-IL-10R antibodies resulted in a decreased number of Treg cells with a concomitant increase in the number of Th17 cells (41). In conclusion, production of IL-10 by Treg cells contributes to maintaining an adequate immune response during RSV infection.
Interestingly, a difference in the Treg response is observed when comparing primary to secondary RSV infections: during primary RSV infection Treg cells expand to maintain an immunological environment favoring viral clearance, while upon secondary infection, a diminished Treg response is observed. This was related to the increased disease severity in the setting of prior FI-RSV vaccination, while this relation was not seen upon secondary exposure to natural RSV infection (42). In a study by Wang et al. (43), an asthmatic phenotype was induced by sensitizing mice to ovalbumin, resulting in an increased Th17 response and a defective Treg response leading to Th2-mediated airway inflammation. Upon primary RSV infection this imbalanced Th17/Treg response was reversed, while secondary RSV infection induced an acute asthma exacerbation by worsening the existing Th17/Treg imbalance.
Thus, during RSV infection, Treg cells have proven their importance in ensuring efficient viral clearance by coordinating recruitment of CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells to the lungs, avoiding an excessive RSV-specific T-cell response (both CD4+ and CD8+) and thus an excessive inflammatory response, limiting inefficient Th2-type immune responses and controlling the innate immune response by neutrophils and NK cells. Defective or suboptimal Treg function during RSV infection may cause immunopathology and hence a more severe clinical picture (44). While the role of the Treg cells as key resolvers of the lung inflammation caused by RSV infection has been established in mice, their role in human RSV-induced disease remains to be further defined (45).
Th17 Cells
Main Characteristics
Th17 cells are IL-17 producing, proinflammatory cells that express the transcription factor retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt (RORγt) (46,47). Their principal action is to stimulate inflammatory reactions and reinforce the acquired cellular immune response against extracellular bacteria, fungi, and viruses (9,48). Due to the ubiquity of the IL-17 receptor on epithelial cells, endothelial cells, monocytes, and macrophages, IL-17 induces a powerful proinflammatory response by stimulating secretion of proinflammatory molecules (46).
Th17 Cells and RSV
Multiple studies were performed in mice to assess the role of Th17 cells during RSV infections. RSV is capable of inducing a Th17 response through activation of complement factor C3a and tachykinins (49). Neutralizing IL-17 in RSV-infected mice led to the reduction of mucus production, inflammation and viral load, an increased number of CD8+ cells and a reduction of Th2 cytokines (50). Moreover, induction of IL-17 by RSV appears to attenuate suppression of Th17 development by IL-27 (51).
Children suffering from a severe RSV infection showed increased IL-17 levels in their tracheal aspirates, as well as elevated plasma concentrations of IL-17 and IL-8 (50,52,53). When comparing the IL-17 concentrations in nonventilated vs. ventilated RSV-infected children, it was demonstrated that the IL-17 concentrations in plasma were higher in the nonventilated group while a significant difference was not present in the nasopharyngeal aspirates (52,54). The nasopharyngeal concentrations of other proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α and IL-6, however, were higher in ventilated infants. Another difference between these two populations was demonstrated by measuring the nasopharyngeal IL-17 concentrations at discharge: in the nonventilated infants these were significantly higher than at admission, while this was not seen in the ventilated group. The explanation for this seemingly paradoxical reaction, i.e., a higher IL-17 level in moderately ill (nonventilated) when compared to severely ill (ventilated) RSV-infected children is still controversial (54). In line with these results, it has previously been demonstrated that a greater proinflammatory response seen in nasal samples was associated with a less severe bronchiolitis, while a less pronounced inflammatory response was found in critically ill patients (52).
A role for IL-17 is thus clearly demonstrated in RSV infections and four underlying mechanisms resulting in severe RSV infections are proposed. Firstly, IL-17 will cause exaggerated mucus production (50,55). Secondly, IL-17 is thought to enhance Th2 cytokine production in a Th2 skewed environment (50). IL-13, a proinflammatory cytokine primarily secreted by Th2 cells, is a known critical mediator of airway hyperresponsiveness, directly modulating airway epithelial mucus production, influencing eosinophil migration into the lungs, and possibly also acting as a direct smooth muscle spasmogen (56). In contrast, IL-17 has no direct effect on airway hyper-responsiveness, which is solely Th2-mediated (50). In this context, a number of studies showed that RSV-infected mice simultaneously produced IL-17 and IL-13 suggesting that the Th17 response is concomitant with the Th2 response (50,55,56). Thirdly, IL-17 has been associated with increased neutrophilic infiltration in the lungs. This effect is brought forth by enhancing the production of CXC chemokines by stromal cells, such as IL-8 (50). Fourthly, IL-17 seems to diminish effector CD8+ T-cell responses through negative regulation of T-bet and Eomes, two transcription factors that regulate the CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell effector functions, thus diminishing viral clearance (50,55).
Mechanisms Controlling T-cell Differentiation
The transcription factors and various cytokines involved in determining T-cell differentiation are depicted schematically in Figure 1 .
Th1 Subset
The critical cytokines for Th1 differentiation are IL-12 (produced by antigen-presenting cells and macrophages) and IFN-γ (produced by NK cells), which activate the transcription factors Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 1 and STAT4 (57). STAT1 further stimulates T-bet, the characteristic transcription factor of the Th1 lineage. Together, STAT4 and T-bet ensure Th1 differentiation and create a positive feedback loop through IFN-γ production (57,58). Moreover, T-bet inhibits GATA3 and RORγt functionality, thus impeding Th2 and Th17 differentiation and favoring Th1 differentiation. In a later stage, IL-18 further stimulates IFN-γ production, enhancing differentiation toward the Th1 subset (57). Both TGF-β and IL-6 inhibit Th1 differentiation by limiting the expression of T-bet and STAT1, respectively (57,58,59).
Th2 Subset
The critical cytokines for Th2 differentiation are IL-4 and IL-2. IL-4 is initially produced by naive CD4+ T-cells and induces the transcription factor STAT6, which in turn induces GATA3, the characteristic transcription factor for the Th2 lineage (57,60). GATA3 and STAT6 enhance Th2 cytokine production. In the presence of IL-6, more IL-4 will be available due to increased production by naive T-cells. IL-2 activates an IL-4 independent pathway through STAT5 and is essential for the production of IL-4 by Th2 cells. Moreover, GATA3 inhibits Th1 differentiation by interacting with T-bet and downregulating STAT4 (57). TGF-β inhibits Th2 differentiation by limiting expression of GATA3, independently of STAT6 (57,61).
Treg Subset
Differentiation toward the Treg subset depends on the presence of TGF-β in absence of IL-6 (62,63).
The essential role for TGF-β in the differentiation of Treg cells is exerted through induction of the STAT5 transcription factor (63,64). IL-2 and retinoic acid further reinforce differentiation toward the Treg subset (65). IL-2 achieves this by inducing the transcription factor STAT5, which in turn will enhance Foxp3 expression, and retinoic acid by promoting TGF-β signaling and Foxp3 promoter activity while inhibiting Th17 differentiation by blocking IL-6 signaling (47,64). IL-10 also plays a part in promoting differentiation toward the Treg subset (66).
Th17 Subset
Mice. The critical cytokines for Th17 differentiation are IL-6 and TGF-β. Together, they induce RORγt, the characteristic transcription factor of the Th17 lineage, in a STAT3-dependent manner (9,46). Moreover, in the presence of IL-6, Th17 cells can secrete TGF-β in an autocrine manner thus contributing to a stable and maintained Th17 response (67). The absolute requirement for TGF-β is attributable to the inhibition of Th1 cell differentiation, since Th1 cells strongly inhibit Th17 differentiation in the absence of TGF-β (62).
IL-21 is capable of enhancing Th17 differentiation and proliferation as well, resulting in a positive feedback loop since Th17 is the major producer of IL-21 (46,62). On the other hand, IL-21 is known to supress Foxp3 (62). The cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α play an accessory role, as they further augment differentiation of the Th17 cells (68). More importantly, IL-23 is essential for terminal differentiation of the Th17 subset and exerts this function in a STAT3-dependent manner (62,69). By upregulating its own receptor on Th17 cells, yet another positive feedback mechanism is ensured (62).
Negative control over Th17 differentiation is regulated through four distinct mechanisms: IL-27 and IFN-γ through STAT1 activation (9,46,51,70,71); IL-2 and IL-4 through STAT5 activation (72,73); IL-13 through stimulation of IL-10 production by Th17 cells, leading to IL-6 downregulation and thus diminished IL-17 production (74); loss of the inhibition of RORγt by Foxp3 when IL-6 is present (75,76). The balance between Foxp3 and RORγt is therefore a very important factor in the Th17/iTreg equilibrium.
Humans. The exact mechanisms involved in the differentiation into Th17 cells are less clear in humans. In contrast to the situation in mice, the combination of IL-6 and TGF-β alone does not suffice for human Th17 differentiation; the cytokines IL-1β, IL-21, and TNF-α are also essential (77,78,79). Whether TGF-β is necessary for human Th17 differentiation remains a matter of debate (80).
Influence of RSV on T-cell Differentiation
RSV stimulates the secretion of a multitude of cytokines: IL-10 and IL-6 by DCs (81); IL-1β by macrophages (82); IL-6, IL-23, and TGF-β by epithelial cells (83); TNF-α by neutrophils (6). The secretion of these particular cytokines suggests favoring of Th17 differentiation. RSV-infected human bronchial epithelial cells enhance the expression of the inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB and release multiple chemokines (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, IL-6, IL-8, and RANTES) leading to recruitment and differentiation of neutrophils, eosinophils and T helper cells. Differentiation into Th17 cells is stimulated, while the differentiation into Treg cells is inhibited (84). Moreover, RSV is able to induce a Th2-like effector profile of the Treg cells by inducing GATA-3. This results in the loss of the Treg cell’s normal suppressive function and causes allergic airway disease (85). The exact mechanisms by which RSV exerts its effect on T-cell differentiation is yet to be clarified. Recent studies indicate potential roles for the autophagy-associated protein Map1-LC3b in Th17 differentiation and the H3K4 histone methyltransferase SMYD3 in Treg differentiation (86,87).
Plasticity
The plasticity of T-cells ensures the adaptability of the immune response to the local environment. This is emphasized by the discovery that Treg cells can differentiate into Th17 cells, particularly when exogenous IL-1β, IL-23, or IL-21 is administered in vitro (88). This plasticity is further demonstrated by the existence of Foxp3+ RORγt+ CD4+ T-cells in which characteristics of both Treg cells (Foxp3+) and Th17 cells (RORγt+) can be found. There seems to be considerably more plasticity in the Th17 lineage than in the Th1 and Th2 lineages which are resistant to further differentiation due to epigenetic modifications of the associated gene loci (28). At least 25% of Th17 cells once expressed Foxp3. This could point out the ability of Foxp3+ Treg cells to differentiate into Th17 cells when the appropriate proinflammatory cytokines are present (76).
Plasmacytoid DCs are able to induce IL-17 secretion from Foxp3+ Treg cells associated with an inhibition of Treg suppressive activities (89). Human Treg cells are largely resistant to IL-6 and differentiate to the Th17 lineage in an IL-1-dependent manner. Therefore, infiltrating Treg cells at sites of infection where IL-1β is highly expressed may not necessarily exert a suppressive function, but might instead participate in the inflammatory reaction against the inciting pathogen through conversion to the Th17 lineage (28).
The reverse, i.e., differentiation of Th17 cells into Treg cells, has not yet been described (65). In turn, Th17 cells also display phenotypic instability as they are able to convert into Th1 cells in a STAT4- and T-bet-dependent manner. This might be important after the initial Th17-mediated response to successfully clear the excessive inflammation (29,65). In conclusion, the human regulation of the T-cell balance is a very dynamic process. Understanding this, delicate equilibrium could help create new opportunities in the treatment of infections by viruses, such as RSV (75).
Th17/Treg Balance in RSV and its Clinical Relevance
As shown above, the developmental pathways of Th17 and Treg cells are closely and reciprocally interconnected. In addition, plasticity from the Treg subset to the Th17 subset has been demonstrated. These findings suggest a balance between both cell types. Moreover, the functions of both cells can be regarded as opposed to one another: Th17 cells promote inflammation which can even result in autoimmunity, Treg cells attempt to control the inflammatory responses and maintain self-tolerance. In this context, the Th17/Treg balance has proved its potential in explaining the pathogenesis of several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease (9,10).
It has likewise been demonstrated that this balance is implicated in the pathogenesis of an RSV infection. The Treg and Th17 subsets have distinct and opposing features in this context, as demonstrated by their effects on viral clearance, clinical severity, and Th2-oriented immune response (see Table 1 ). Specifically, the Treg immune response will ensure an efficient viral clearance and inhibition of the Th2-oriented immune response resulting in a less severe clinical picture (34,36,37,38,39). Although evidence is less conclusive than is the case for the Treg immune response, the Th17 immune response is thought to hamper an efficient viral clearance and further enhance a Th2 immune response resulting in a more severe clinical picture (50). Moreover, the CD8+ T cellular response during RSV infection seems to be counteracted by Th17 cells through IL-17 while being stimulated by Treg cells through promoting early influx of CD8+ T-cells to the lungs, therefore resulting in efficient viral clearance (37,50,55). It is also important to note the opposing effect of IL-10, i.e., inhibitory on Th17 cells and stimulatory on Treg cells (41,74).
In the 1960s, the FI-RSV vaccine led to exacerbated disease and increased need for ventilatory support during subsequent natural RSV infection. Administering this vaccine to mice resulted in a complete absence of Treg cells in the airways, enhanced lung inflammation and augmented clinical severity upon RSV infection. Moreover, increasing the number of Treg cells in the airways by selective chemoattraction with CCL17/22 reversed the enhanced lung inflammation and weight loss (11). An increased severity of RSV disease after FI-RSV vaccination was associated with a Th17-like memory response (90).
As described above, Qin et al. (84) demonstrated that human bronchial epithelial cells, when infected by RSV, stimulate differentiation into Th17 cells, while inhibiting differentiation into Treg cells. Li et al. (91) determined the presence of Th17 and Treg on peripheral blood, as well as the cytokine concentrations of IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-17 on peripheral blood plasma in a population of 33 children suffering from RSV bronchiolitis. The percentage of Treg cells and the concentrations of IL-10 and TGF-β were significantly lower in this population, compared to children suffering from a non-RSV pneumonia and healthy controls. Meanwhile, the percentage of Th17 cells and the concentration of IL-17 were significantly higher, compared to children suffering from a non-RSV pneumonia and healthy controls. When Galectin-9, an indirect inhibitor of Th1 and Th17 responses, was administered to RSV-infected mice, the viral load decreased, mucus production was inhibited and lung pathology diminished: these effects were achieved by inhibition of the Th17 response and induction of the Treg response (92). These studies show that an imbalance between Treg cells and Th17 cells might be an important pathogenic factor determining clinical severity of an RSV infection.
Prevention
Because of the failure of the FI-RSV vaccine, only live attenuated RSV or RSV proteins expressed in a live virus vector have, so far, been considered safe for testing in RSV naive children (93). Vaccines currently under investigation should promote protective and efficient immunity without adverse effects, prevent the Th2 immune response demonstrated upon FI-RSV vaccination, and promote viral clearance before disease establishment (94). However, up to now, no efficient vaccine has been licensed (93). Several studies are ongoing to evaluate multiple approaches in vaccine development. An overview of their progress in research is provided by PATH (95). For example, DNA vaccines based on the gene coding for RSV’s G protein have been able to balance the production of Th1/Th2 cytokines in the lungs of mice during RSV infection, successfully evading the Th2 memory response. Another approach using the bacillus Calmette-Guérin bacteria modified to express RSV’s N and M2-1 proteins was able to induce the beneficial Th1 response and resulted in a decrease of pulmonary inflammation and reduced viral loads. As a last example, a subunit vaccine using RSV’s F protein was able to elicit a Th1 response in mice as well (94).
Until an effective RSV vaccine will be licensed, our best preventive alternative consists of passive immunization with antibodies, of which palivizumab is the best known example (96).
Concluding Remarks
We can conclude that a balance between the Th17 and Treg cell subsets could play an important role in the pathogenesis of an RSV infection. A better understanding of the T-cell subset profile during RSV infections, with particular interest in the balance between Th17 and Treg, their cytokines and transcription factors, is thus desirable. The cytokines involved in the differentiation of and the interaction between the different subsets should be a main point of interest. Influencing the leading cytokine profiles could eventually allow to modify the balance between the different T-cell subsets in such a way, that it would be possible to predict, diagnose and treat each patient according to his or her individual immunological response to RSV.
Statement of Financial Support
All authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
Bueno SM, González PA, Pacheco R, et al. Host immunity during RSV pathogenesis. Int Immunopharmacol 2008;8:1320–9.
McNamara PS, Smyth RL. The pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus disease in childhood. Br Med Bull 2002;61:13–28.
Hervás D, Reina J, Yañez A, del Valle JM, Figuerola J, Hervás JA. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute bronchiolitis in children: differences between RSV and non-RSV bronchiolitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;31:1975–81.
Oshansky CM, Zhang W, Moore E, Tripp RA. The host response and molecular pathogenesis associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Future Microbiol 2009;4:279–97.
Welliver RC. Respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viruses. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22(2 Suppl):S6–10; discussion S10–2.
Bueno SM, González PA, Riedel CA, Carreño LJ, Vásquez AE, Kalergis AM. Local cytokine response upon respiratory syncytial virus infection. Immunol Lett 2011;136:122–9.
González PA, Bueno SM, Carreño LJ, Riedel CA, Kalergis AM. Respiratory syncytial virus infection and immunity. Rev Med Virol 2012;22:230–44.
Becker Y. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) evades the human adaptive immune system by skewing the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance toward increased levels of Th2 cytokines and IgE, markers of allergy–a review. Virus Genes 2006;33:235–52.
Kimura A, Kishimoto T. IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance. Eur J Immunol 2010;40:1830–5.
Heylen M, Ruyssers NE, Gielis EM, et al. Of worms, mice and man: an overview of experimental and clinical helminth-based therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmacol Ther 2014;143:153–67.
Loebbermann J, Durant L, Thornton H, Johansson C, Openshaw PJ. Defective immunoregulation in RSV vaccine-augmented viral lung disease restored by selective chemoattraction of regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:2987–92.
Hassan MA, Eldin AM, Ahmed MM. T - helper2 /T - helper1 imbalance in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in relation to disease severity and outcome. Egypt J Immunol 2008;15:153–60.
Raveh D, Kruskal BA, Farland J, Ezekowitz RA. Th1 and Th2 cytokines cooperate to stimulate mannose-receptor-mediated phagocytosis. J Leukoc Biol 1998;64:108–13.
Bembridge GP, Garcia-Beato R, López JA, Melero JA, Taylor G. Subcellular site of expression and route of vaccination influence pulmonary eosinophilia following respiratory syncytial virus challenge in BALB/c mice sensitized to the attachment G protein. J Immunol 1998;161:2473–80.
Johnson TR, Graham BS. Secreted respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein induces interleukin-5 (IL-5), IL-13, and eosinophilia by an IL-4-independent mechanism. J Virol 1999;73:8485–95.
Qin L, Peng D, Hu C, et al. Differentiation of Th subsets inhibited by nonstructural proteins of respiratory syncytial virus is mediated by ubiquitination. PLoS One 2014;9:e101469.
Dulek DE, Newcomb DC, Toki S, et al. STAT4 deficiency fails to induce lung Th2 or Th17 immunity following primary or secondary respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) challenge but enhances the lung RSV-specific CD8+ T cell immune response to secondary challenge. J Virol 2014;88:9655–72.
Bendelja K, Gagro A, Bace A, et al. Predominant type-2 response in infants with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection demonstrated by cytokine flow cytometry. Clin Exp Immunol 2000;121:332–8.
Legg JP, Hussain IR, Warner JA, Johnston SL, Warner JO. Type 1 and type 2 cytokine imbalance in acute respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:633–9.
Román M, Calhoun WJ, Hinton KL, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants is associated with predominant Th-2-like response. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:190–5.
Bont L, Heijnen CJ, Kavelaars A, et al. Peripheral blood cytokine responses and disease severity in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. Eur Respir J 1999;14:144–9.
Brandenburg AH, Kleinjan A, van Het Land B, et al. Type 1-like immune response is found in children with respiratory syncytial virus infection regardless of clinical severity. J Med Virol 2000;62:267–77.
Garofalo RP, Patti J, Hintz KA, Hill V, Ogra PL, Welliver RC. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (not T helper type 2 cytokines) is associated with severe forms of respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. J Infect Dis 2001;184:393–9.
Pinto RA, Arredondo SM, Bono MR, Gaggero AA, Díaz PV. T helper 1/T helper 2 cytokine imbalance in respiratory syncytial virus infection is associated with increased endogenous plasma cortisol. Pediatrics 2006;117:e878–86.
van Benten IJ, van Drunen CM, Koopman LP, et al. RSV-induced bronchiolitis but not upper respiratory tract infection is accompanied by an increased nasal IL-18 response. J Med Virol 2003;71:290–7.
Eisenstein EM, Williams CB. The T(reg)/Th17 cell balance: a new paradigm for autoimmunity. Pediatr Res 2009;65(5 Pt 2):26R–31R.
Shalev I, Schmelzle M, Robson SC, Levy G. Making sense of regulatory T cell suppressive function. Semin Immunol 2011;23:282–92.
Afzali B, Mitchell P, Lechler RI, John S, Lombardi G. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: induction of interleukin-17 production by regulatory T cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;159:120–30.
O’Connor RA, Taams LS, Anderton SM. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: CD4 T helper cells: functional plasticity and differential sensitivity to regulatory T cell-mediated regulation. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;159:137–47.
Fantini MC, Becker C, Monteleone G, Pallone F, Galle PR, Neurath MF. Cutting edge: TGF-beta induces a regulatory phenotype in CD4+CD25- T cells through Foxp3 induction and down-regulation of Smad7. J Immunol 2004;172:5149–53.
Miyara M, Sakaguchi S. Natural regulatory T cells: mechanisms of suppression. Trends Mol Med 2007;13:108–16.
Bopp T, Becker C, Klein M, et al. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate is a key component of regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. J Exp Med 2007;204:1303–10.
Huang CT, Workman CJ, Flies D, et al. Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity 2004;21:503–13.
Fulton RB, Meyerholz DK, Varga SM. Foxp3+ CD4 regulatory T cells limit pulmonary immunopathology by modulating the CD8 T cell response during respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Immunol 2010;185:2382–92.
Raiden S, Pandolfi J, Payasliàn F, et al. Depletion of circulating regulatory T cells during severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;189:865–8.
Lee DC, Harker JA, Tregoning JS, et al. CD25+ natural regulatory T cells are critical in limiting innate and adaptive immunity and resolving disease following respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Virol 2010;84:8790–8.
Ruckwardt TJ, Bonaparte KL, Nason MC, Graham BS. Regulatory T cells promote early influx of CD8+ T cells in the lungs of respiratory syncytial virus-infected mice and diminish immunodominance disparities. J Virol 2009;83:3019–28.
Loebbermann J, Thornton H, Durant L, et al. Regulatory T cells expressing granzyme B play a critical role in controlling lung inflammation during acute viral infection. Mucosal Immunol 2012;5:161–72.
Durant LR, Makris S, Voorburg CM, Loebbermann J, Johansson C, Openshaw PJ. Regulatory T cells prevent Th2 immune responses and pulmonary eosinophilia during respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. J Virol 2013;87:10946–54.
Loebbermann J, Schnoeller C, Thornton H, et al. IL-10 regulates viral lung immunopathology during acute respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice. PLoS One 2012;7:e32371.
Weiss KA, Christiaansen AF, Fulton RB, Meyerholz DK, Varga SM. Multiple CD4+ T cell subsets produce immunomodulatory IL-10 during respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Immunol 2011;187:3145–54.
Liu J, Cao S, Peppers G, Kim SH, Graham BS. Clonotype-specific avidity influences the dynamics and hierarchy of virus-specific regulatory and effector CD4(+) T-cell responses. Eur J Immunol 2014;44:1058–68.
Wang J, Kong L, Luo Q, et al. Dual effects of respiratory syncytial virus infections on airway inflammation by regulation of Th17/Treg responses in ovalbumin-challenged mice. Inflammation 2014;37:1984–2005.
Openshaw PJ, Chiu C. Protective and dysregulated T cell immunity in RSV infection. Curr Opin Virol 2013;3:468–74.
Habibi MS, Openshaw PJ. Benefit and harm from immunity to respiratory syncytial virus: implications for treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2012;25:687–94.
Awasthi A, Kuchroo VK. Th17 cells: from precursors to players in inflammation and infection. Int Immunol 2009;21:489–98.
de Jong E, Suddason T, Lord GM. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: development of mouse and human T helper 17 cells. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;159:148–58.
Crome SQ, Wang AY, Levings MK. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: function and regulation of human T helper 17 cells in health and disease. Clin Exp Immunol 2010;159:109–19.
Bera MM, Lu B, Martin TR, et al. Th17 cytokines are critical for respiratory syncytial virus-associated airway hyperreponsiveness through regulation by complement C3a and tachykinins. J Immunol 2011;187:4245–55.
Mukherjee S, Lindell DM, Berlin AA, et al. IL-17-induced pulmonary pathogenesis during respiratory viral infection and exacerbation of allergic disease. Am J Pathol 2011;179:248–58.
de Almeida Nagata DE, Demoor T, Ptaschinski C, et al. IL-27R-mediated regulation of IL-17 controls the development of respiratory syncytial virus-associated pathogenesis. Am J Pathol 2014;184:1807–18.
Larrañaga CL, Ampuero SL, Luchsinger VF, et al. Impaired immune response in severe human lower tract respiratory infection by respiratory syncytial virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:867–73.
Stoppelenburg AJ, de Roock S, Hennus MP, Bont L, Boes M. Elevated Th17 response in infants undergoing respiratory viral infection. Am J Pathol 2014;184:1274–9.
Faber TE, Groen H, Welfing M, Jansen KJ, Bont LJ. Specific increase in local IL-17 production during recovery from primary RSV bronchiolitis. J Med Virol 2012;84:1084–8.
Bystrom J, Al-Adhoubi N, Al-Bogami M, Jawad AS, Mageed RA. Th17 lymphocytes in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Viruses 2013;5:777–91.
Hashimoto K, Durbin JE, Zhou W, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in the absence of STAT 1 results in airway dysfunction, airway mucus, and augmented IL-17 levels. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:550–7.
Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, Xia B. CD4+T cells: differentiation and functions. Clin Dev Immunol 2012;2012:925135.
O’Garra A, Arai N. The molecular basis of T helper 1 and T helper 2 cell differentiation. Trends Cell Biol 2000;10:542–50.
Gorelik L, Constant S, Flavell RA. Mechanism of transforming growth factor beta-induced inhibition of T helper type 1 differentiation. J Exp Med 2002;195:1499–505.
Noben-Trauth N, Hu-Li J, Paul WE. Conventional, naive CD4+ T cells provide an initial source of IL-4 during Th2 differentiation. J Immunol 2000;165:3620–5.
Heath VL, Murphy EE, Crain C, Tomlinson MG, O’Garra A. TGF-beta1 down-regulates Th2 development and results in decreased IL-4-induced STAT6 activation and GATA-3 expression. Eur J Immunol 2000;30:2639–49.
Bi Y, Yang R. Direct and indirect regulatory mechanisms in TH17 cell differentiation and functions. Scand J Immunol 2012;75:543–52.
Tran DQ. TGF-β: the sword, the wand, and the shield of FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells. J Mol Cell Biol 2012;4:29–37.
Li MO, Flavell RA. TGF-beta: a master of all T cell trades. Cell 2008;134:392–404.
Zhou L, Chong MM, Littman DR. Plasticity of CD4+ T cell lineage differentiation. Immunity 2009;30:646–55.
Di Cesare A, Di Meglio P, Nestle FO. The IL-23/Th17 axis in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:1339–50.
Gutcher I, Donkor MK, Ma Q, Rudensky AY, Flavell RA, Li MO. Autocrine transforming growth factor-β1 promotes in vivo Th17 cell differentiation. Immunity 2011;34:396–408.
Veldhoen M, Hocking RJ, Atkins CJ, Locksley RM, Stockinger B. TGFbeta in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells. Immunity 2006;24:179–89.
McGeachy MJ, Chen Y, Tato CM, et al. The interleukin 23 receptor is essential for the terminal differentiation of interleukin 17-producing effector T helper cells in vivo. Nat Immunol 2009;10:314–24.
Wojno ED, Hunter CA. New directions in the basic and translational biology of interleukin-27. Trends Immunol 2012;33:91–7.
Yeh WI, McWilliams IL, Harrington LE. IFNγ inhibits Th17 differentiation and function via Tbet-dependent and Tbet-independent mechanisms. J Neuroimmunol 2014;267:20–7.
Laurence A, Tato CM, Davidson TS, et al. Interleukin-2 signaling via STAT5 constrains T helper 17 cell generation. Immunity 2007;26:371–81.
Villarino AV, Gallo E, Abbas AK. STAT1-activating cytokines limit Th17 responses through both T-bet-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J Immunol 2010;185:6461–71.
Newcomb DC, Boswell MG, Huckabee MM, et al. IL-13 regulates Th17 secretion of IL-17A in an IL-10-dependent manner. J Immunol 2012;188:1027–35.
Ziegler SF, Buckner JH. FOXP3 and the regulation of Treg/Th17 differentiation. Microbes Infect 2009;11:594–8.
Zhou L, Lopes JE, Chong MM, et al. TGF-beta-induced Foxp3 inhibits T(H)17 cell differentiation by antagonizing RORgammat function. Nature 2008;453:236–40.
Hemdan NY, Birkenmeier G, Wichmann G. Key molecules in the differentiation and commitment program of T helper 17 (Th17) cells up-to-date. Immunol Lett 2012;148:97–109.
Lee WW, Kang SW, Choi J, et al. Regulating human Th17 cells via differential expression of IL-1 receptor. Blood 2010;115:530–40.
Yang L, Anderson DE, Baecher-Allan C, et al. IL-21 and TGF-beta are required for differentiation of human T(H)17 cells. Nature 2008;454:350–2.
Boniface K, Blom B, Liu YJ, de Waal Malefyt R. From interleukin-23 to T-helper 17 cells: human T-helper cell differentiation revisited. Immunol Rev 2008;226:132–46.
González PA, Prado CE, Leiva ED, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus impairs T cell activation by preventing synapse assembly with dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:14999–5004.
Lotz MT, Peebles RS Jr . Mechanisms of respiratory syncytial virus modulation of airway immune responses. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2012;12:380–7.
Feng J, Hu Y, Song Z, Liu Y, Guo X, Jie Z. Interleukin-23 facilitates Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation in vitro following respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Med Virol 2015;87:708–15.
Qin L, Hu CP, Feng JT, Xia Q. Activation of lymphocytes induced by bronchial epithelial cells with prolonged RSV infection. PLoS One 2011;6:e27113.
Krishnamoorthy N, Khare A, Oriss TB, et al. Early infection with respiratory syncytial virus impairs regulatory T cell function and increases susceptibility to allergic asthma. Nat Med 2012;18:1525–30.
Reed M, Morris SH, Owczarczyk AB, Lukacs NW. Deficiency of autophagy protein Map1-LC3b mediates IL-17-dependent lung pathology during respiratory viral infection via ER stress-associated IL-1. Mucosal Immunol 2015;8:1118–30.
de Almeida Nagata DE, Ting HA, Cavassani KA, et al. Epigenetic control of Foxp3 by SMYD3 H3K4 histone methyltransferase controls iTreg development and regulates pathogenic T-cell responses during pulmonary viral infection. Mucosal Immunol 2015;8:1131–43.
Koenen HJ, Smeets RL, Vink PM, van Rijssen E, Boots AM, Joosten I. Human CD25highFoxp3pos regulatory T cells differentiate into IL-17-producing cells. Blood 2008;112:2340–52.
Gautreau L, Chabannes D, Heslan M, Josien R. Modulation of regulatory T cell-Th17 balance by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol 2011;90:521–7.
Zeng R, Zhang H, Hai Y, et al. Interleukin-27 inhibits vaccine-enhanced pulmonary disease following respiratory syncytial virus infection by regulating cellular memory responses. J Virol 2012;86:4505–17.
Li B, Wu FL, Feng XB, Sun DK, Cui QQ, Zhao ZX. [Changes and the clinical significance of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells and Th17 cells in peripheral blood of infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis]. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi 2012;28:426–8.
Lu X, McCoy KS, Xu J, et al. Galectin-9 ameliorates respiratory syncytial virus-induced pulmonary immunopathology through regulating the balance between Th17 and regulatory T cells. Virus Res 2015;195:162–71.
Anderson LJ. Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development. Semin Immunol 2013;25:160–71.
Espinoza JA, Bueno SM, Riedel CA, Kalergis AM. Induction of protective effector immunity to prevent pathogenesis caused by the respiratory syncytial virus. Implications on therapy and vaccine design. Immunology 2014;143:1–12.
RSV vaccine technology landscape snapshot. PATH, 2015. Accessed 24 March 2015. http://sites.path.org/vaccinedevelopment/files/2011/12/RSV-snapshot-March2015.pdf.
Turner TL, Kopp BT, Paul G, Landgrave LC, Hayes D Jr, Thompson R. Respiratory syncytial virus: current and emerging treatment options. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2014;6:217–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
PowerPoint slides
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mangodt, T., Van Herck, M., Nullens, S. et al. The role of Th17 and Treg responses in the pathogenesis of RSV infection. Pediatr Res 78, 483–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.143
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2015.143
This article is cited by
-
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) in liver fibrosis
Cell Death Discovery (2023)
-
Increased blood immune regulatory cells in severe COVID-19 with autoantibodies to type I interferons
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Gut microbiota induces hepatic steatosis by modulating the T cells balance in high fructose diet mice
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Integrated relationship of nasopharyngeal airway host response and microbiome associates with bronchiolitis severity
Nature Communications (2022)
-
COVID-19 and the role of cytokines in this disease
Inflammopharmacology (2022)