Sir, we acknowledge the recent article that discussed a patient's challenging experience with a dental implant received during a visit to India, as documented by S. Mumtaz et al.1 Our sympathies are with the patient who underwent a difficult ordeal and required additional treatment upon returning to the UK. The NHS faces significant challenges, exacerbated by post-pandemic economic factors like inflation and increased costs. Consequently, some individuals may consider seeking dental treatment elsewhere. We understand the tough decisions patients must make regarding their dental care in light of these circumstances.

While sympathising with the challenges faced by the patient, it is crucial to recognise that the outcome described may be attributed to the choice of a less-experienced practitioner rather than the geographical location of the treatment. It is unfortunate that the patient faced complications, but it's important to acknowledge the presence of well-qualified dental specialists in India who undergo rigorous training and adhere to international standards. Blaming solely the choice of destination may inadvertently perpetuate a stereotype that all overseas dental practitioners lack the necessary expertise. Moreover, globalisation has facilitated the exchange of knowledge, and many dental professionals worldwide have received extensive training and education in advanced dental procedures, including implantology. Patients opting for dental tourism should prioritise thorough research and select practitioners with recognised qualifications and positive reviews.

While the letter aptly emphasises the need for improved oversight in dental tourism, it is equally important to foster a collaborative approach that acknowledges the global competence of dental professionals. The emphasis should be on raising awareness about the importance of selecting experienced and qualified practitioners, regardless of the geographical location. Therefore, let us approach this issue with nuance, recognising that the incident described may be attributed to the choice of a less-experienced practitioner rather than implicating the capabilities of the entire dental community in a particular region.