Abstract
Mature cortical pyramidal neurons receive excitatory inputs onto small protrusions emanating from their dendrites called spines. Spines undergo activity-dependent remodelling, stabilization and pruning during development, and similar structural changes can be triggered by learning and changes in sensory experiences1,2,3,4. However, the biochemical triggers and mechanisms of de novo spine formation in the developing brain and the functional significance of new spines to neuronal connectivity are largely unknown. Here we develop an approach to induce and monitor de novo spine formation in real time using combined two-photon laser-scanning microscopy and two-photon laser uncaging of glutamate. Our data demonstrate that, in mouse cortical layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons, glutamate is sufficient to trigger de novo spine growth from the dendrite shaft in a location-specific manner. We find that glutamate-induced spinogenesis requires opening of NMDARs (N-methyl-d-aspartate-type glutamate receptors) and activation of protein kinase A (PKA) but is independent of calcium–calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB) receptors. Furthermore, newly formed spines express glutamate receptors and are rapidly functional such that they transduce presynaptic activity into postsynaptic signals. Together, our data demonstrate that early neural connectivity is shaped by activity in a spatially precise manner and that nascent dendrite spines are rapidly functionally incorporated into cortical circuits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
During postnatal development, the formation and elimination of glutamatergic synapses are thought to be reflected in the growth and retraction of dendritic spines. In cortical pyramidal neurons, waves of new spine growth (spinogenesis) and synapse formation (synaptogenesis) occur at specific developmental stages, followed by pruning as the brain matures5. Many signals have been proposed to trigger and regulate de novo spine growth in a developing circuit including neurotrophins, neurotransmitters and cell-adhesion molecules6,7,8,9. To uncover the triggers for and mechanisms of spinogenesis, we imaged dendrites of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-expressing cortical layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons while releasing glutamate at a specific dendritic location by two-photon laser-induced photolysis of (4-methoxy-7-nitroindolinyl)-glutamate (MNI-glutamate) (Fig. 1). Analysis was performed in acute cortical brain slices from young mice (postnatal day (P) 8–12), a period in which spinogenesis occurs in vivo10.
Stimulation near the edge of a dendrite with 40 0.5-ms laser pulses at 0.5 Hz in a Mg2+-free extracellular solution induced growth of a new spine in approximately 14% of cases (Fig. 1a–d and Supplementary Fig. 1), showing the possibility of de novo spinogenesis induced by glutamate exposure11. Increasing stimulation frequency and laser pulse duration while maintaining the total number of stimuli at 40 increased the rate of spinogenesis such that, at 5 Hz with 4 ms duration, a maximal success rate of approximately 50% was achieved (Fig. 1c). Nascent spines arose from the dendrite where glutamate was released with high specificity (Fig. 1b) such that more than 70% of them grew within 1 μm of the uncaging spot (Fig. 1e) and 94% of them grew on the side of the dendrite exposed to glutamate.
In 128 of 132 examples of glutamate-induced spinogenesis, the spine was seen to emerge without a filopodial stage (see Supplementary Fig. 2a for an exception). Instead, spine growth occurred incrementally but explosively such that the spine head volume increased from 10 to 90% of maximum within 11.8 ± 1.5 pulses of glutamate (5.9 ± 0.8 s at 2 Hz stimulation) (Fig. 2a–c and Supplementary Fig. 3). The final sizes and lengths of the newborn spines were heterogeneous but not different from those of pre-existing neighbouring spines (Fig. 2d, e). The lifetime of newly formed spines was variable such that approximately 20% lasted less than 2 min but those that lasted 5 min were stable and remained for at least 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, these newly formed spines either did not require continued exposure to glutamate for maintenance or they received glutamate from an alternative source such as an axonal bouton.
Glutamate-induced spinogenesis was restricted within postnatal developmental such that its efficiency diminished by P14–15 and it failed to occur by P19–20 (Supplementary Fig. 5). This was not due to decreased glutamate receptor activation in older animals because the uncaging-evoked excitatory postsynaptic current (uEPSC) was larger at P19–20 than at P10–12 (Supplementary Fig. 6).
Previous ultrastructural studies have revealed a high frequency of dendrite shaft synapses in hippocampus in early postnatal life that decreases as spinogenesis occurs12, leading to a model of synaptic development in which synapses are initially formed directly onto the dendritic shaft and a spine subsequently grows from this point with the synapse attached. On the other hand, rapid movement of a physically connected spine head and axonal bouton together through a complex neuropile is difficult to reconcile with the high density of crossing axons and dendrites13. Our data demonstrate that glutamate uncaging-induced spinogenesis occurs with high spatial specificity and probability on the side of the dendrite exposed to glutamate. These findings place a lower limit of approximately 1 µm−1 for the density of dendritic shaft synapses required to support this model of spinogenesis. To estimate the number of dendritic shaft synapses, Ca2+ imaging was performed in conditions in which most synapses formed onto a stretch of dendrite were activated (approximately 90%, Supplementary Fig. 7). Under these conditions, we observed hotspots of Ca2+ influx in spineless stretches of dendrite at a density of 0.05 μm−1. This corresponds to a density of dendritic shaft synapses containing NMDARs that is approximately 20-fold less than necessary to explain the specificity and efficiency of glutamate-induced spinogenesis (see Supplementary Fig. 7 for further discussion).
The high success rate of spinogenesis induced by glutamate uncaging allows identification of the signalling pathways that couple activity to spine growth (Fig. 3). Previous analyses of spine generation induced by electrical stimulation indicate a requirement for NMDARs in this process14,15, and at this age NMDARs are found throughout the dendrite (Supplementary Fig. 8). Preventing NMDAR activation with the antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) nearly abolished spinogenesis whereas it was unaffected by inhibiting α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)/kainate glutamate receptors with 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo[f]quinoxaline-2,3-dione (NBQX) (Fig. 3a). The voltage-gated sodium channel antagonist tetrodotoxin also did not affect spinogenesis, discarding the possibility that postsynaptic action potentials are necessary. Addition of extracellular Mg2+ significantly decreased the success rate, suggesting that the degree of current flux through NMDARs plays a crucial role in triggering spine formation. Blocking either mGluR1 or mGluR5 using 7-hydroxyiminocyclopropan[b]chromen-1a-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (CPCCOEt) or 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) or with the less selective group I mGluR antagonist 1-aminoindan-1,5-dicarboxylic acid (AIDA) demonstrated that neither was strictly necessary for spinogenesis. Lastly, depleting Ca2+ stores with cyclopiazonic acid or thapsigargin significantly inhibited spine formation. Thus our data indicate that NMDARs, with additional contributions from intracellular stores provide, the coupling between glutamate and activation of intracellular pathways responsible for spinogenesis.
We further considered intracellular signalling pathways that might be activated in a spatially delimited fashion by glutamate and could provide the spatial information necessary for local spine growth. Previous studies of long-term potentiation and associated spine enlargement in older animals demonstrated a need for activation of CaMKII or signalling by neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinases such as the BDNF receptor TrkB16,17,18,19. However, we found that activity-dependent spinogenesis is unaffected by the kinase inhibitors KN-62, KN-93 and K252a, indicating independence from CaMKII and TrkB signalling (Fig. 3a).
The cyclic AMP (cAMP)-activated kinase PKA is required for long-term potentiation induction in younger neurons20, and gradients in its concentration can be maintained over micrometre-length scales21. Raising cAMP concentration by applying the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin was not sufficient to generate spines on its own (n = 3, data not shown), but glutamate uncaging in its presence increased the spinogenesis success rate to approximately 80% (Fig. 3a). In the presence of forskolin, multiple spines often grow with each induction attempt (Fig. 3b, c), including at sites more distant from the uncaging location (Fig. 3d). In addition, the PKA inhibitor H-89 prevented new spine growth (Fig. 3a), indicating that PKA activity is necessary but not sufficient for spinogenesis.
The small guanosine triphosphatase Ras is activated by Ca2+ influx through NMDARs and signals through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) to promote long-term potentiation17,22. We found that the MAPK pathway was necessary for spinogenesis because the success rate was significantly reduced by blocking the upstream activator MAPK kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) with U0126 or MEK1 with PD98059 (Fig. 3a). In pyramidal neurons, activated Ras diffuses from active spines to neighbouring spines and heterosynaptically facilitates plasticity17. To examine if a similar phenomenon potentiates spinogenesis, we delivered a ‘priming’ stimulus to a pre-existing spine (40 pulses at 2 Hz, Fig. 3e) and then a ‘test’ stimulus to the dendritic shaft within 1–2 min. In contrast to previous studies of older neurons in hippocampus16,17,18, we found no consistent increase in volume of the existing spine in response to this priming stimulus (Fig. 3f), supporting the idea that spinogenesis is not simply due to the growth of an undetectable pre-existing spine. Nevertheless, the success rate of spine generation was enhanced by the priming stimulus in a MEK1/2-dependent manner such that the low level of spinogenesis evoked by a 0.5 Hz test stimulus was increased. In contrast, the priming stimulus did not increase the success rate when the test stimulus was delivered at 2 Hz (Fig. 3g), indicating that the priming protocol shifted the induction threshold for spinogenesis.
With the exception of the NMDAR and PKA antagonists, none of the pharmacological manipulations that altered spinogenesis rates affected dendritic currents or Ca2+ transients (Supplementary Fig. 8). As expected, CPP largely abolished the Ca2+ transient and the prolonged phase of the currents. Consistent with a facilitation of Ca2+ influx through NMDARs by PKA23,24, H-89 lowered dendritic Ca2+ transients by approximately 20% (Supplementary Table 1). However, this effect is insufficient to explain the near abolition of spinogenesis because the rate of spinogenesis evoked by 0.5 ms uncaging pulses in control conditions was higher than that evoked by 4 ms pulses in H-89, despite eliciting smaller dendritic Ca2+ transients (Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Table 1).
We examined whether endogenous synaptic activity generates new spines in cortical tissue from young mice through similar pathways. In normal extracellular Mg2+, high-frequency (100 pulses at 100 Hz, delivered twice, separated by 10 s) but not low-frequency (10 Hz) electrical tetani rapidly triggered new spine growth (Fig. 3h, i). Blockade of NMDARs or PKA prevented this synaptically evoked spine growth (Fig. 3i) as well as spontaneous new spine growth that occurred when NMDAR activation was increased by removing extracellular Mg2+ and blocking inhibitory GABAA receptors (Supplementary Fig. 9). Hence, multiple experimental models demonstrate that activity-dependent spinogenesis in developing cortex requires NMDAR- and PKA-dependent signalling.
To determine if nascent spines detect synaptically released glutamate and are functionally incorporated into the circuit, we generated new spines by high-frequency stimulation (HFS) and examined their synaptic responses using optical quantal analysis of synaptic properties. A whole-cell recording was obtained and the probability and amplitude of synaptically evoked NMDAR-mediated Ca2+ transients in the spine head were monitored (Fig. 4a). Using the Ca2+-sensitive green fluorophore Fluo-5F, we detected stimulus-evoked Ca2+ transients in the heads of newly grown spines (Fig. 4b, c), demonstrating that they sense synaptic activity within a neural circuit within 30 min after growth. Similar results were obtained in five of seven new spines and in 11 of 16 pre-existing spines. Analysis of the spines in which an evoked Ca2+ transient could be detected indicated that nascent spines displayed smaller and less frequent synaptically evoked Ca2+ transients than pre-existing spines (Fig. 4d, e). Similar results were obtained for new spines that grew in response to glutamate uncaging and were probed using a glass-stimulating electrode placed near the spine (Supplementary Fig. 10).
The AMPA receptor (AMPAR) and NMDAR content of new spines was characterized using glutamate uncaging after HFS-induced spinogenesis. In all cases, we detected fast uEPSCs at a holding potential of −60 mV and large prolonged uEPSCs at +40 mV (Fig. 4g), consistent with AMPAR- and NMDAR-mediated currents previously characterized in these cells25. Similarly, uncaging-evoked Ca2+ transients were clearly visible at −60 mV (Fig. 4h) but were larger at +40 mV (data not shown), consistent with the known properties of NMDAR-mediated Ca2+ influx. Despite similar-sized AMPAR-uEPSCs in new and pre-existing spines, NMDAR-uEPSCs and Ca2+ influx were significantly lower in nascent than pre-existing spines (Fig. 4g, h), similar to previous descriptions of spontaneously appearing new spines in hippocampal organotypic slices26. Therefore the smaller Ca2+ transients measured in nascent spines by synaptic activation probably reflect a smaller number of postsynaptic NMDARs.
In this study, we established a protocol for the reliable and spatiotemporally precise induction of spinogenesis. These experiments demonstrate that glutamate is sufficient to trigger rapid spine formation and suggest that neurons use glutamate release to establish circuit wiring. Thus these data support the hypothesis that axonal growth and glutamate release may be the triggering event in synapse formation such that axonal bouton localization is an important early step for precise neuronal circuit formation10,27. Given the involvement of NMDARs, Ca2+ stores, cAMP, PKA and MAPK in activity-dependent spinogenesis, it is likely that many neuromodulators that regulate these molecules may influence the capacity or threshold for new spine formation. For instance, activation of dopaminergic, serotonergic or adrenergic receptors that signal by Gαs may facilitate spinogenesis, whereas receptors that activate Gαi-coupled signalling may function as inhibitory signals.
Lastly, we provide experimental evidence that spines that grow de novo in developing cortical tissue become rapidly functionally integrated into the circuit such that they sense synaptically released glutamate through AMPARs and NMDARs. Whether these nascent spines are rapidly physically associated with a presynaptic bouton and display the ultrastructural correlates of a synapse is unknown26,28,29,30. Our results indicate that spines can grow de novo without the need for a filopodial intermediate and probably without a dendritic-shaft synapse stage. In total, this study demonstrates that synaptic activity can rapidly modify neuronal connectivity with high accuracy by generating new circuit elements.
Methods Summary
All procedures on animals followed protocols approved by the Harvard Standing Committee on Animal Care and National Institutes of Health guidelines. In utero electroporation of EGFP was performed at embryonic day 15.5 in C57BL/6 mice. All studies were performed on layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in acute coronal slices identified by their characteristic morphology, position in the slice and expression of GFP. Two-photon glutamate uncaging and imaging was performed using custom microscopes. To induce spine growth, 40 uncaging pulses were delivered at varying frequencies to a spot approximately 0.5 µm from the edge of the dendrite. Synaptically induced spine growth was triggered with two high-frequency stimuli (100 pulses at 100 Hz) separated by 10 s delivered by a bipolar electrode positioned approximately 30 µm from the target dendrite. For Ca2+ imaging, neurons were loaded through the whole-cell recording electrode with Alexa Fluor-594 (20 µM) and Fluo-5F (300 µM) and the amplitudes of fluorescence transients were quantified as a fraction of the maximal green fluorescence achieved in saturating (sat) Ca2+ concentrations (Gsat). For optical quantal analysis, the synapse associated with a visualized spine was stimulated using a closely positioned glass electrode. The position of the electrode and stimulus intensity were adjusted until (1) Ca2+ transients were evoked in the spine head that demonstrated stochastic failures and successes, and (2) Ca2+ transients in other spines and the dendritic shaft in the field of view were not evoked. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the efficacy of spinogenesis across conditions. For each spinogenesis trial, an observer blind to the experimental condition was asked to identify if (1) a new spine had grown and (2), if so, how many spines had grown.
References
Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W. B. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002)
Hofer, S. B., Mrsic-Flogel, T. D., Bonhoeffer, T. & Hubener, M. Experience leaves a lasting structural trace in cortical circuits. Nature 457, 313–317 (2009)
Trachtenberg, J. T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002)
Zuo, Y., Yang, G., Kwon, E. & Gan, W. B. Long-term sensory deprivation prevents dendritic spine loss in primary somatosensory cortex. Nature 436, 261–265 (2005)
Rakic, P., Bourgeois, J. P., Eckenhoff, M. F., Zecevic, N. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Concurrent overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex. Science 232, 232–235 (1986)
Dalva, M. B., McClelland, A. C. & Kayser, M. S. Cell adhesion molecules: signalling functions at the synapse. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 206–220 (2007)
Scheiffele, P. Cell-cell signaling during synapse formation in the CNS. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 485–508 (2003)
Sudhof, T. C. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 455, 903–911 (2008)
Yuste, R. & Bonhoeffer, T. Genesis of dendritic spines: insights from ultrastructural and imaging studies. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 24–34 (2004)
Miller, M. & Peters, A. Maturation of rat visual cortex. II. A combined Golgi-electron microscope study of pyramidal neurons. J. Comp. Neurol. 203, 555–573 (1981)
Richards, D. A. et al. Glutamate induces the rapid formation of spine head protrusions in hippocampal slice cultures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6166–6171 (2005)
Fiala, J. C., Feinberg, M., Popov, V. & Harris, K. M. Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1. J. Neurosci. 18, 8900–8911 (1998)
Sorra, K. E., Fiala, J. C. & Harris, K. M. Critical assessment of the involvement of perforations, spinules, and spine branching in hippocampal synapse formation. J. Comp. Neurol. 398, 225–240 (1998)
Engert, F. & Bonhoeffer, T. Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Nature 399, 66–70 (1999)
Maletic-Savatic, M., Malinow, R. & Svoboda, K. Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity. Science 283, 1923–1927 (1999)
Harvey, C. D. & Svoboda, K. Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature 450, 1195–1200 (2007)
Harvey, C. D., Yasuda, R., Zhong, H. & Svoboda, K. The spread of Ras activity triggered by activation of a single dendritic spine. Science 321, 136–140 (2008)
Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. & Kasai, H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 429, 761–766 (2004)
Tanaka, J. et al. Protein synthesis and neurotrophin-dependent structural plasticity of single dendritic spines. Science 319, 1683–1687 (2008)
Yasuda, H., Barth, A. L., Stellwagen, D. & Malenka, R. C. A developmental switch in the signaling cascades for LTP induction. Nature Neurosci. 6, 15–16 (2003)
Zaccolo, M. & Pozzan, T. Discrete microdomains with high concentration of cAMP in stimulated rat neonatal cardiac myocytes. Science 295, 1711–1715 (2002)
Di Cristo, G. et al. Requirement of ERK activation for visual cortical plasticity. Science 292, 2337–2340 (2001)
Chalifoux, J. R. & Carter, A. G. GABAB receptors modulate NMDA receptor calcium signals in dendritic spines. Neuron 66, 101–113 (2010)
Skeberdis, V. A. et al. Protein kinase A regulates calcium permeability of NMDA receptors. Nature Neurosci. 9, 501–510 (2006)
Busetto, G., Higley, M. J. & Sabatini, B. L. Developmental presence and disappearance of postsynaptically silent synapses on dendritic spines of rat layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 586, 1519–1527 (2008)
Zito, K., Scheuss, V., Knott, G., Hill, T. & Svoboda, K. Rapid functional maturation of nascent dendritic spines. Neuron 61, 247–258 (2009)
Hamori, J. The inductive role of presynaptic axons in the development of postsynaptic spines. Brain Res. 62, 337–344 (1973)
De Roo, M., Klauser, P., Mendez, P., Poglia, L. & Muller, D. Activity-dependent PSD formation and stabilization of newly formed spines in hippocampal slice cultures. Cereb. Cortex 18, 151–161 (2008)
Nagerl, U. V., Kostinger, G., Anderson, J. C., Martin, K. A. & Bonhoeffer, T. Protracted synaptogenesis after activity-dependent spinogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 27, 8149–8156 (2007)
Knott, G. W., Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Welker, E. & Svoboda, K. Spine growth precedes synapse formation in the adult neocortex in vivo . Nature Neurosci. 9, 1117–1124 (2006)
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Sabatini laboratory for their comments on the manuscript and assistance with data analysis. We are grateful to S. Nazia for technical support and for acting as the blind evaluator. This work was supported by a SFARI grant from the Simons Foundation and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS046579).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.B.K. and B.L.S. designed the experiments and wrote the paper. H.B.K. performed all the experiments, analysed the data (other than spine counting by a blind, third-party observer) and prepared the figures.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Methods, additional references, Supplementary Figures 1-10 with legends and Supplementary Tables 1-2. (PDF 1866 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwon, HB., Sabatini, B. Glutamate induces de novo growth of functional spines in developing cortex. Nature 474, 100–104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09986
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09986
This article is cited by
-
Fetal cannabidiol (CBD) exposure alters thermal pain sensitivity, problem-solving, and prefrontal cortex excitability
Molecular Psychiatry (2023)
-
Electroacupuncture modulates glutamate neurotransmission to alleviate PTSD-like behaviors in a PTSD animal model
Translational Psychiatry (2023)
-
Recovery of Visual Field After Awake Stimulation Mapping of the Optic Pathway in Glioma Patients
Brain Topography (2023)
-
Learning binds new inputs into functional synaptic clusters via spinogenesis
Nature Neuroscience (2022)
-
Induction of synapse formation by de novo neurotransmitter synthesis
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.