Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Understanding and Addressing Inequality in Education
Inequality in education is a defining challenge of our time. Around the world, students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds are far more likely to underperform in school than are students from advantaged backgrounds. This gap emerges early in development and widens with age. This represents an enormous loss of potential and perpetuates harm into adulthood.
What are the causes of inequality? And what can we do to reduce inequality? With our special Collection in npj Science of Learning, we will work toward developing an interdisciplinary understanding of inequality in education, as this topic goes beyond one single discipline related to learning and education.
This special Collection invites submissions from a wide variety of disciplines, including (but not limited to) psychology, pedagogy, sociology, neuroscience, genetics, economics, and educational science. We are open to monodisciplinary submissions, but we encourage submissions that move beyond disciplinary boundaries, propose inter- or multidisciplinary perspectives on inequality, and approach inequality from new and unexpected angles. We encourage a developmental perspective, so we welcome submissions that focus on a critical developmental phase, transition, or trajectory (e.g., how inequality develops in early childhood or manifests across the transition to university). We invite both empirical articles and theoretical articles (e.g., Comments and Reviews).
Some of the many questions that might be addressed by the articles in this issue include:
What are the barriers faced by individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged groups? This might include students from poor or working-class backgrounds, first-generation students, Indigenous students, and students of color.
How do parents, teachers, and educational contexts (e.g., school norms and policies) contribute to inequality in education? For example, what are the roles of cultural capital and elitism?
How do genetic and neurocognitive processes interact with contexts to produce inequality in education?
How do stereotypes and students’ beliefs (e.g., mindsets, self-perceptions) perpetuate inequality in education?
How can we design interventions that reduce educational inequality at scale? How can these interventions be adapted to local contexts (e.g., in low- and middle-income countries)?
How can we reconcile individualistic and structural explanations of inequality in education?
This comment presents some general principles for multidisciplinary research to capitalize on the growing attention for inequality in education across academic disciplines. The variety of theoretical and methodological perspectives across disciplines results in different conceptual frameworks and empirical designs to study inequality in education. While each framework and design contributes to our shared understanding of the problem, combining these perspectives requires awareness of the various lenses through which educational inequalities are being studied. We identify three dimensions along which perspectives on inequality of education vary between disciplines. These dimensions pertain to (1) how the problem of inequality in education is framed, (2) how inequality in education is empirically evaluated, and (3) how the role of education in fostering (in)equality is conceptualized. In response, we propose three general principles that may help deal with this variation when building a multidisciplinary body of knowledge on inequality in education.