Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Combined inhibition of XIAP and BCL2 drives maximal therapeutic efficacy in genetically diverse aggressive acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Aggressive therapy-resistant and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an extremely poor outcome. By analyzing a large number of genetically complex and diverse, primary high-risk poor-outcome human AML samples, we identified specific pathways of therapeutic vulnerability. Through drug screens followed by extensive in vivo validation and genomic analyses, we found inhibition of cytosolic and mitochondrial anti-apoptotic proteins XIAP, BCL2 and MCL1, and a key regulator of mitosis, AURKB, as a vulnerability hub based on patient-specific genetic aberrations and transcriptional signatures. Combinatorial therapeutic inhibition of XIAP with an additional patient-specific vulnerability eliminated established AML in vivo in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) bearing diverse genetic aberrations, with no signs of recurrence during off-treatment follow-up. By integrating genomic profiling and drug-sensitivity testing, this work provides a platform for a precision-medicine approach for treating aggressive AML with high unmet need.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Identification of therapeutic targets in patients with high-risk poor-outcome AML.
Fig. 2: Identification of compounds with in vitro efficacy against high-risk poor-outcome AML.
Fig. 3: Factors correlating with responsiveness and resistance of high-risk poor-outcome AML cells to AZD5582.
Fig. 4: In vitro responsiveness of AML cells to the top five prioritized compounds.
Fig. 5: Dependence of leukemic cells on XIAP for survival is linked to TP53 transcriptional activity, while activation of EVI1 leads to diminished BCL2 dependence.
Fig. 6: In vitro response profiles to pairs of compounds in high-risk human AML.
Fig. 7: In vitro drug response profiles predict effective in vivo drug responses in high-risk human AML.
Fig. 8: In vivo validation of optimized combination treatments selected through in vitro drug prioritization.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All DNA and RNA sequencing datasets produced in this study were deposited at the National Bioscience Database Center. Accession numbers are hum0116 for DNA sequencing data and hum0243 for RNA-seq data. Differential expression analysis results can be browsed interactively on ZENBU at https://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/zenbu/reports/#Identification_of_therapeutic_targets_in_poor_outcome_AML_patients. Any other relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The scripts for motif activity analysis are available at http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/suppl/Alam_et_al_2020/34.

References

  1. Tallman, M. S., Gilliland, D. G. & Rowe, J. M. Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 106, 1154–1163 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiNardo, C. D. et al. Durable remissions with ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 2386–2398 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perl, A. E. et al. Gilteritinib or chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1728–1740 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stein, E. M. et al. Molecular remission and response patterns in patients with mutant-IDH2 acute myeloid leukemia treated with enasidenib. Blood 133, 676–687 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone, R. M. et al. Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 454–464 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cortes, J. E. et al. Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 33, 379–389 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DiNardo, C. D. et al. Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML. Blood 135, 791–803 (2020).

  8. Tallman, M. S. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 17, 721–749 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abelson, S. et al. Prediction of acute myeloid leukaemia risk in healthy individuals. Nature 559, 400–404 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bahr, C. et al. A Myc enhancer cluster regulates normal and leukaemic haematopoietic stem cell hierarchies. Nature 553, 515–520 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, J. et al. Myelodysplastic syndrome progression to acute myeloid leukemia at the stem cell level. Nat. Med. 25, 103–110 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasserjian, R. P., Steensma, D. P., Graubert, T. A. & Ebert, B. L. Clonal hematopoiesis and measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 135, 1729–1738 (2020).

  13. Shlush, L. I. et al. Tracing the origins of relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia to stem cells. Nature 547, 104–108 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tyner, J. W. et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 562, 526–531 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessy, E. J. et al. Discovery of a novel class of dimeric Smac mimetics as potent IAP antagonists resulting in a clinical candidate for the treatment of cancer (AZD5582). J. Med. Chem. 56, 9897–9919 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dohner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129, 424–447 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Papaemmanuil, E. et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 2209–2221 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rollig, C. et al. Long-term prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the new genetic risk classification of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations: evaluation of the proposed reporting system. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2758–2765 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eden, E., Lipson, D., Yogev, S. & Yakhini, Z. Discovering motifs in ranked lists of DNA sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e39 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eden, E., Navon, R., Steinfeld, I., Lipson, D. & Yakhini, Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 48 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Supek, F., Bosnjak, M., Skunca, N. & Smuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 6, e21800 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiozaki, E. N. et al. Mechanism of XIAP-mediated inhibition of caspase-9. Mol. Cell 11, 519–527 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chai, J. et al. Structural basis of caspase-7 inhibition by XIAP. Cell 104, 769–780 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riedl, S. J. et al. Structural basis for the inhibition of caspase-3 by XIAP. Cell 104, 791–800 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Varfolomeev, E. et al. IAP antagonists induce autoubiquitination of c-IAPs, NF-κB activation, and TNFα-dependent apoptosis. Cell 131, 669–681 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vince, J. E. et al. IAP antagonists target cIAP1 to induce TNFα-dependent apoptosis. Cell 131, 682–693 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nixon, C. C. et al. Systemic HIV and SIV latency reversal via non-canonical NF-κB signalling in vivo. Nature 578, 160–165 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, Y., Fang, S., Jensen, J. P., Weissman, A. M. & Ashwell, J. D. Ubiquitin protein ligase activity of IAPs and their degradation in proteasomes in response to apoptotic stimuli. Science 288, 874–877 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertrand, M. J. et al. cIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 30, 689–700 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Galban, S. et al. Cytoprotective effects of IAPs revealed by a small molecule antagonist. Biochem. J. 417, 765–771 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bisaillon, R. et al. Genetic characterization of ABT-199 sensitivity in human AML. Leukemia 34, 63–74 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chan, S. M. et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations induce BCL-2 dependence in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 21, 178–184 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Alam, T. et al. Comparative transcriptomics of primary cells in vertebrates. Genome Res. 30, 951–961 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Suzuki, H. et al. The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Nat. Genet. 41, 553–562 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Boettcher, S. et al. A dominant-negative effect drives selection of TP53 missense mutations in myeloid malignancies. Science 365, 599–604 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Jeffers, J. R. et al. Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell 4, 321–328 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gallenne, T. et al. Bax activation by the BH3-only protein Puma promotes cell dependence on antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members. J. Cell Biol. 185, 279–290 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kawase, T. et al. p53 target gene AEN is a nuclear exonuclease required for p53-dependent apoptosis. Oncogene 27, 3797–3810 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lizio, M. et al. Update of the FANTOM web resource: expansion to provide additional transcriptome atlases. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D752–D758 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lizio, M. et al. Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas. Genome Biol. 16, 22 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Groschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yamazaki, H. et al. A remote GATA2 hematopoietic enhancer drives leukemogenesis in inv(3)(q21;q26) by activating EVI1 expression. Cancer Cell 25, 415–427 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jongen-Lavrencic, M. et al. Molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1189–1199 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Walter, R. B. & Appelbaum, F. R. Next-generation sequencing for measuring minimal residual disease in AML. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 473–474 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roboz, G. J. et al. Ivosidenib induces deep durable remissions in patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 135, 463–471 (2019).

  47. Wattad, M. et al. Impact of salvage regimens on response and overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia with induction failure. Leukemia 31, 1306–1313 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Brumatti, G. et al. The caspase-8 inhibitor emricasan combines with the SMAC mimetic birinapant to induce necroptosis and treat acute myeloid leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 339ra369 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pei, S. et al. Monocytic subclones confer resistance to venetoclax-based therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 10, 536–551 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Berges, C. et al. Proteasome inhibition activates the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human CD4+ T cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 108, 935–946 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen, T., Wong, Y. S., Zheng, W. & Liu, J. Caspase- and p53-dependent apoptosis in breast carcinoma cells induced by a synthetic selenadiazole derivative. Chem. Biol. Interact. 180, 54–60 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim, J. et al. Wild-type p53 promotes cancer metabolic switch by inducing PUMA-dependent suppression of oxidative phosphorylation. Cancer Cell 35, 191–203 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu, J., Wang, P., Ming, L., Wood, M. A. & Zhang, L. SMAC/Diablo mediates the proapoptotic function of PUMA by regulating PUMA-induced mitochondrial events. Oncogene 26, 4189–4198 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Moon, J. H. et al. A novel small-molecule IAP antagonist, AZD5582, draws Mcl-1 down-regulation for induction of apoptosis through targeting of cIAP1 and XIAP in human pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 6, 26895–26908 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, W. H., Hsiao, H. W., Tsou, W. I. & Lai, M. Z. Notch inhibits apoptosis by direct interference with XIAP ubiquitination and degradation. EMBO J. 26, 1660–1669 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Bahr, C., Correia, N. C. & Trumpp, A. Stem cells make leukemia grow again. EMBO J. 36, 2667–2669 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lapidot, T. et al. A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367, 645–648 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rosen, J. M. & Jordan, C. T. The increasing complexity of the cancer stem cell paradigm. Science 324, 1670–1673 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2019.01. (Chemical Computing Group ULC, 2019).

  60. Kitayner, M. et al. Structural basis of DNA recognition by p53 tetramers. Mol. Cell 22, 741–753 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Saito, Y. et al. Overcoming mutational complexity in acute myeloid leukemia by inhibition of critical pathways. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaao1214 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Momozawa, Y. et al. Low-frequency coding variants in CETP and CFB are associated with susceptibility of exudative age-related macular degeneration in the Japanese population. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 5027–5034 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Momozawa, Y. et al. Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls. Nat. Commun. 9, 4083 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Landrum, M. J. & Kattman, B. L. ClinVar at five years: delivering on the promise. Hum. Mutat. 39, 1623–1630 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Morioka, M. S. et al. Cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE): a quantitative and genome-wide assay of transcription start sites. Methods Mol. Biol. 2120, 277–301 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Saito, Y. et al. A pyrrolo-pyrimidine derivative targets human primary AML stem cells in vivo. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 181ra152 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Liang, X., Potter, J., Kumar, S., Ravinder, N. & Chesnut, J. D. Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA. J. Biotechnol. 241, 136–146 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Brinkman, E. K., Chen, T., Amendola, M. & van Steensel, B. Easy quantitative assessment of genome editing by sequence trace decomposition. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e168 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.I. is supported by the RIKEN President’s Discretionary Fund. Support from colleagues at Toranomon Hospital is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H., Y.S. and F.I.; methodology, M.H., M.Y., M.d.H. and Y.M.; formal analysis, M.H., M.Y., S. Takata, M.E., H.A., T.W., J.A.R., J.S., A.K., H.Y. and Y.S.; investigation, M.H., R.N., I.O., A.K., K.S., H.K., S.F., R.-i.M., K.O. and Y.S.; resources, N.U., S. Takagi and S. Taniguchi; writing (original draft), M.H. and Y.S.; writing (review and editing), Y.S., T.F., Y.O., T.H., O.O., L.D.S., P.V., M.d.H., Y.M. and F.I.; supervision, Y.S., O.O., L.D.S., P.V., M.d.H., Y.M. and F.I.; funding acquisition, F.I.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumihiko Ishikawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Cancer thanks Marina Konopleva and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Target identification and chemical screening to discover vulnerabilities in poor prognosis AML.

a, Distribution of risk groups in present study cohort (n = 216 AML patients) compared with previously published AML studies16,17,18. b,c, RNAseq results of (b) FLT3 WT and (c) FLT3-mutated AML-engrafting cells obtained from deceased patients (n = 86; FLT3 WT n = 54, FLT3-mutated n = 32) was compared with normal CD34 + hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells obtained from healthy donors (n = 44) and illustrated in a volcano plot showing Log2FC and Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value (-log base10). Genes targeted by inhibitors were highlighted by red color. d, Representative in vitro 35-compound chemical screening in a 96-well format. Equal numbers of AML cells were exposed to test compounds at concentrations of 30 nM and 300 nM. Note a dose-dependent reduction in AML cell cluster size with AZD5582, YM155, venetoclax, S63845, dinaciclib, GSK923295, SB74391 and barasertib compared to vehicle controls. e, CB HSPCs were exposed to each compound for 72 hours at doses indicated (YM155: 100 nM n = 2, 300 nM n = 2; dinaciclib: 30 nM n = 3, 100 nM n = 3; SB743921: 30 nM n = 3, 100 nM n = 2; AZD5582: 1 nM n = 6, 3 nM n = 6, 10 nM n = 6, 30 nM n = 7; venetoclax: 100 nM n = 2, 300 nM n = 3; S63845: 100 nM n = 3, 300 nM n = 3; barasertib: 30 nM n = 3, 100 nM n = 4; GSK923295: 30 nM n = 3, 100 nM n = 3; n represents number of CB samples). For each compound, the concentration achieving effective in vitro AML elimination as shown in Fig. 2a is indicated by red color. Data are shown as mean + /-s.e.m. f, AZD5582 selectively targeted human AML cells compared with CB-derived HSPCs in vitro (n = 20, 20, 19 AML cases at 3, 10, 30 nM respectively; CB HSPCs n = 5 at each dose; p = 9.71e-12, 1.67e-11, 9.97e-9, respectively for comparison between AML and CB HSCPs at each dose by unpaired two-tailed t-test; mean + /-s.e.m.). g, Viability, proliferation and differentiation capacity of CB-derived CD34 + HSPCs exposed to 30 nM AZD5582 were assessed using single-cell colony-forming cell (CFC) assay. Numbers of erythroid (BFU-E) and myeloid (CFU-M, CFU-GM) colonies arising from single AZD5582-treated CB HSPCs were compared with vehicle treated CB HSPCs and tested by paired two-tailed t-test. Three independent experiments were performed and data presented as mean + /-s.e.m. h, Viability of 15 patient samples containing both AML cells and T cells treated with AZD5582 at 30 nM were compared with those treated with vehicle control in vitro at 30 nM. Representative flow cytometry dot plot showing effective elimination of leukemia cells and sparing of human T cells by AZD5582 (Patient 74).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Heterogeneous responses of AML cells to compounds including a SMAC-mimetic/IAP inhibitor AZD5582.

a, Targeting BIRC4 and BIRC2 through transduction of ribonucleotide complex consisting of Cas9 protein and guide RNA targeting BIRC2 and BIRC4 was performed in AZD5582-sensitive Molm13 cells and AZD5582-resistant TF1a cells. Mean with sem of three independent experiments are shown. Significant differences were detected using unpaired two-tailed t-test. b, Viability of FLT3 WT AML treated with AZD5582 were compared with monovalent SMAC-mimetic AT406 and second-generation SMAC-mimetic/bivalent antagonist of IAP proteins birinapant. AZD5582 3 nM n = 7, 30 nM n = 15; birinapant 3 nM n = 3, 30 nM n = 9; AT406 3 nM n = 3, 30 nM n = 9; p = 0.000116 and 0.000307 for comparison of each compound against AZD5582 at 3 nM, p = 2.26e-13 and 4.74e-5 for each comparison at 30 nM by unpaired two-tailed t-test where n represents the number of AML cases. Data are presented as mean + /-s.e.m. c, In vitro responses to AZD5582, birinapant, venetoclax, S63845, barasertib and GSK923295 are shown for human AML cells obtained from PDX mice (n = 21). d, Correlation between Responsiveness profiles of AZD5582 at 30 nM and birinapant at 300 nM against 21 human AML samples was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation test (r = 0.9864, two-tailed p-value=2.32e-16).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 In vitro responsiveness of leukemia cells to five compounds in order of elimination efficacy of S63845, barasertib and GSK923295.

AML cases are arranged in the order of responsiveness to a, S63845, b, barasertib and c, GSK923295. Information on selected somatic mutations and chromosome abnormalities are shown below (n = 66).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 XIAP dependence in TP53-mutated human AML cells correlates with TP53-regulated transcription of BBC3.

a,e, The regions of (a) chromosome 19 containing BBC3 gene, structure of BBC3 gene and its transcripts and (e) chromosome 15 containing AEN gene, structure of AEN gene and its transcripts obtained from FANTOM5 database. b,f, In AML cells, (b) a major BBC3 transcription start site (TSS) associated with ENST00000439096.2 and f, AEN TSS associated with ENST00000332810.3, ENST00000557787.1, ENST00000559528.1, ENST00000560174.1 and ENST00000558327.1 were identified through CAGE-sequencing. Correlation of AZD5582 responsiveness with promoter activity upstream of the identified TSS for b, BBC3 and f, AEN. AZD5582-sensitive n = 25, AZD5582-resistant n = 2 (TP53 mutations Glu286Val, Ile255del and Val73fs). c,g, Previously reported ChIP-seq data in two leukemia cell lines K562 and Molm13 confirming binding of WT TP53 and TP53 mutants Tyr220Cys and Arg282Trp with preserved TP53 motif activity to the promoter region upstream of the identified TSS for c, BBC3 and g, AEN. Promoter binding was abolished in TP53 KO cells. d,h, ChIP-seq data obtained from ENCODE confirming specificity of TP53 binding to d, BBC3 promoter and h, AEN promoter as compared with non-specific binding pattern for all human transcription factors.

Extended Data Fig. 5 In vivo efficacy of AZD5582-based combination treatments.

a, Frequencies of human CD45+ AML cells in the recipient spleen with or without treatment are shown. For each category, 91 PDX mice created from 8 AML cases with sensitivity to both AZD5582 and venetoclax, 33 PDX mice created from 4 AML cases with sensitivity to AZD5582 but resistance to venetoclax and 15 PDX mice created from 2 AML cases with resistance to AZD5582 but sensitivity to venetoclax were analyzed. Data are shown as mean + /-s.e.m. Detailed data for each PDX-model mouse is summarized in Supplementary Table 8. b.c, AML cell elimination in (b) femurs and (c) spleens of PDX mice, shown by immunohistochemical staining for human CD45+ (brown) and HE staining. Broken lines indicate blood vessels containing erythrocytes; arrowheads indicate neutrophils; arrows indicate megakaryocytes.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Recovery of normal hematopoiesis in mice treated with AZD5582-based combination treatments.

a, Human CD45-labeled and HE-stained femoral sections and b, PB flow cytometry of Patient 9, 1, 22, 2 and 51 PDX mice during 4-week course of AZD5582 and AZD5582-based combination treatments. In (a), white broken lines in HE-stained images outline blood vessels containing erythrocytes and arrows indicate murine megakaryocytes. Femoral section and PB flow cytometry from a non-recipient NSG mice are shown as comparison. c, Following in vivo treatment with AZD5582 combined with venetoclax and AZD5582 combined with barasertib, Mac1+ Gr1- monocytes and Mac1+ Gr1+ granulocytes were found in the recipient BM (representative flow cytometry plots shown). Mac1+ Gr1- monocytes and Mac1+ Gr1+ granulocytes were identified by May-Grunwald Giemsa staining after treatment with AZD5582 and venetoclax.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Individualized patient response to in vivo therapeutic targeting of XIAP, BCL2 and MCL1.

a,b, Individualized patient response to AZD5582-based combination therapy with (a) venetoclax and (b) S63845 are shown. Number of PDX models generated for each patient are presented above the panels. Significance of AML cell elimination was assessed by paired two-tailed t-test (PB) and unpaired two-tailed t-test (BM, SPL). PB, peripheral blood; BM, bone marrow; SPL, spleen; Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-treatment.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Individualized patient response to in vivo therapeutic targeting of XIAP, AURKB and KIF10.

a,b, Individualized patient response to AZD5582-based combination therapy with (a) barasertib and (b) GSK923295 are shown. Number of PDX models generated for each patient are presented above the panels. Significance of AML cell elimination was assessed by paired two-tailed t-test (PB) and unpaired two-tailed t-test (BM, SPL). PB, peripheral blood; BM, bone marrow; SPL, spleen; Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-treatment.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 No sign of recurrence at four weeks off-treatment following a four-week course of AZD5582/venetoclax combination.

a,b, Human CD45-labeled and HE-stained thin sections of femurs from (a) untreated and (b) AZD5582/venetoclax combination-treated Patient 2 PDX mice. White broken lines in HE-stained images outline blood vessels containing erythrocytes. Arrows indicate hCD45-negative murine megakaryocytes. c, Thin sections of femurs from untreated and AZD5582/venetoclax treated PDX-model mice for five AML patients are shown as indicated. The sections were labeled with human CD45 (three panels on the left for each patient) or with HE (two panels on the right for each patient). AZD5582/venetoclax treated mice were first engrafted with patient-derived AML cells then underwent a four-week course of treatment followed by over four weeks off-treatment. The lengths of the scale bars are indicated in panels for Patient 9.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Genetic alterations and treatment response in poor prognosis AML.

a, Response to venetoclax treatment in AML cells with normal chromosome 7 (82 AML cases) and monosomy 7 (21 AML cases). A two-tailed t-test was used to determine statistical significance. b, Correlation between TP53 motif activity and AZD5582 sensitivity in TP53-mutated AML cells with normal chromosome 3, no MLL-rearrangement and wild type IDH1, IDH2, TET2, CBL and NRAS genes (n = 19 AML cases, Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6174, two-tailed p-value=0.0049). c, Correlation between genetic alterations and dependence on XIAP and BCL2 for survival in high-risk AML. Pink arrows, greater dependence on XIAP; blue arrows, greater dependence on BCL2; black arrows, both XIAP- and BCL2-independent. Cases in the pink box are responsive to AZD5582 only or responsive to both AZD5582 and venetoclax in vitro with greater responsiveness to AZD5582; cases in the blue box are responsive to venetoclax only or responsive to both AZD5582 and venetoclax in vitro with greater responsiveness to venetoclax; cases in the black box are responsive to neither in vitro.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–12

Supplementary Video 1

Location of mutated amino acid residues and altered sensitivity to AZD5582. The three-dimensional coordinates of the complex of p53 protein and DNA were obtained from Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 2AHI). p53 protein and DNA backbones are represented with gray and green ribbons, respectively. The zinc ion is shown as a cyan sphere. Mutated amino acid residues are shown as ball-and-stick representations in blue to red, based on AZD5582 elimination (red, sensitive; blue, resistant). These figures were drawn by MOE 2019.0102 (refs. 59,60).

Supplementary Video 2

Location of mutated amino acid residues and altered motif activity of TP53. The three-dimensional coordinates of the complex of p53 protein and DNA were obtained from Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 2AHI). p53 protein and DNA backbones are represented with gray and green ribbons, respectively. The zinc ion is shown as a cyan sphere. Mutated amino acid residues are shown as ball-and-stick representations in blue to red, based on TP53 motif activity values (red, high motif activity; blue, low motif activity). These figures were drawn by MOE 2019.0102 (refs. 59,60).

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Figure source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Source Data Supplementary Table 10

Statistical source data.

Source Data Supplementary Table 12

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashimoto, M., Saito, Y., Nakagawa, R. et al. Combined inhibition of XIAP and BCL2 drives maximal therapeutic efficacy in genetically diverse aggressive acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Cancer 2, 340–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00177-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00177-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research