Abstract
Controlling the topological properties of quantum matter is a major goal of condensed matter physics. A major effort in this direction has been devoted to using classical light in the form of Floquet drives to manipulate and induce states with non-trivial topology. A different route can be achieved with cavity photons. Here we consider a prototypical model for topological phase transition, the one-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, coupled to a single mode cavity. We show that quantum light can affect the topological properties of the system, including the finite-length energy spectrum hosting edge modes and the topological phase diagram. In particular we show that depending on the lattice geometry and the strength of light-matter coupling one can either turn a trivial phase into a topological one or viceversa using quantum cavity fields. Furthermore, we compute the polariton spectrum of the coupled electron-photon system, and we note that the lower polariton branch disappears at the topological transition point. This phenomenon can be used to probe the phase transition in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Light-control of quantum materials is an emerging goal of condensed matter physics. While traditionally light has played the role of spectroscopic probe, recent experimental efforts have demonstrated the possibility of inducing novel phases of matter by selective irradiation1,2 or by coupling to cavity fields3,4,5,6,7.
Topological phases of matter8,9 play an important role in this perspective due to their robustness and their possible application in quantum technologies. As such there has been tremendous interest in the possibility of enhancing or inducing topological properties in electronic system by light, a notable example being the Floquet topological insulator10,11. Floquet-engineered topological band structure was experimentally demonstrated in a variety of solid state materials irradiated by circularly polarized light12,13. Similar efforts in realizing topological phases of matter using time-modulated optical lattices have been made with ultracold atoms14. Quantum fluctuations of the light field in a cavity offer new possibility to probe, control and tune the properties of a material, leading for example to polaritons, hybrid light-matter excitations, with non-trivial topological properties15,16,17,18,19,20,21 or to anomalous Hall response in presence of a circularly polarized field22. Here we ask the question of what happens to a topological material due to the coupling to cavity photons. Such question is of direct experimental relevance given the recent observation of a breakdown of topological protection in an integer Quantum Hall system coupled to a cavity23 and can be also explored with ultracold atoms embedded in high-finesse resonators24,25.
A prototypical model for topological behavior in one dimension is the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model26, originally introduced to describe conducting electrons in polyacetylene and which later found applications in a variety of settings27,28,29,30,31,32,33. The SSH model describes a 1D dimerized chain with alternating weak and strong nearest-neighbor hoppings and displays a topological transition associated with a non-trivial Zak phase. The experimental realization of the SSH model has been demonstrated in ultracold atoms34,35,36, graphene nanoribbons37,38 and in various platforms for topological phenomena, from photonics39,40,41 to mechanical metamaterials42.
In this work, we study the interplay of topological phases of matter and quantum light by considering the SSH model coupled to a single mode photonic resonator through the full gauge invariant Peierls phase. We show that quantum fluctuations of the light field can have dramatic effects on the topological properties of the system and most remarkably turn a trivial insulating phase into a topological one above a critical light-matter coupling, with emergence of non-trivial topological edge modes. This topological transition is possible due to the structure of the Peierls phase, which preserves chiral symmetry and introduces a non-trivial dependence from the lattice geometry, similarly to the case of classical light explored in the context of Floquet driving. Differently from the latter, however, our results do not suffer from heating runaway problems that often plagued Floquet engineering schemes and required high-frequency driving or tailored dissipation. Finally, when considering the limit of an infinite chain we show that the topological transition reduces to the case of the isolated SSH model. However, photons retain memory of the non-trivial topology of the system as we show by computing the polariton spectrum of the hybrid system. We find that the lower polariton branch disappears when the hopping amplitudes is tuned to satisfy the topological criterion. Thus, measurements of the polariton frequencies could provide direct access to the topological phase transition point.
Results
The Model
We consider a one-dimensional SSH model coupled to a single mode cavity (Fig. 1). The SSH model describes spinless electrons hopping on a one-dimensional chain composed of L unit cells with two sublattices A and B.
The Hamiltonian reads
where v ≥ 0 is the intracell hopping amplitude, w ≥ 0 is intercell hopping amplitude, and \({c}_{j\mu }^{{{{\dagger}}} }\) (cjμ) are the fermionic creation (annihilation) operators at site j and sublattice μ = A, B. As shown in Fig. 1 the lattice constant is a0 while the intracell distance between A and B lattice sites is b0 < a0. In absence of any light-matter interaction the SSH model displays a well-known topological phase transition as the ratio between the two hoppings is tuned. In particular the ground-state of the system is in topological phase for v < w with finite Chern number and in a topologically trivial phase for v > w. We emphasize that in this case the spectrum does not depend on the lattice spacing b0. The single mode cavity Hamiltonian is given by
where ωc is the mode frequency and a† (a) are the photon creation (annihilation) operators satisfying [a, a†] = 1. We couple the SSH chain to the cavity mode through the gauge invariant Peierls substitution43,44,45,46,47, which amounts to dress the hoppings amplitudes entering the SSH Hamiltonian Eq. (1) as \(v\to v\,{e}^{ie{{{{{{{\mathcal{A}}}}}}}}{\ell }_{AB}}\) and \(w\to w{e}^{-ie{{{{{{{\mathcal{A}}}}}}}}{\ell }_{BA}}\), where e is the electric charge, \({{{{{{{\mathcal{A}}}}}}}}={A}_{0}(a+{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} })\) is the uniform vector potential, and ℓAB = b0, ℓBA = a0 − b0 represent respectively the distance between atoms in the same (different) unit cell. To understand the origin of this different renormalization we note that the Peierls substitution is completely equivalent to applying a unitary transformation Ω to electronic Hamiltonian47, i.e.
where the unitary is defined as
Here, Rjμ indicates the position of the atom in the μ = A, B sublattice, with RjA = ja0 and RjB = ja0 + b0. Under this unitary transformation the fermionic operators cjA, cjB acquire a site-dependent phase (See Methods) which leads to the full light-matter Hamiltonian of the form (setting a0 = 1)
Several observations are in order here concerning this Hamiltonian. First, the two hopping integrals v, w are renormalised by different Peierls factors due to the different distance between atoms within the same or different unit cell. This gives an explicit dependence of the Hamiltonian from the ratio of lattice spacing b0, which instead is missing in equilibrium and will play a key role in the following. Furthermore, we note that using the unitary operator defined in Eq. (4) one can write down a fully equivalent light-matter Hamiltonian in the Dipole Gauge (see Methods). Finally, we note that in Eqs. (4)–(5) we have rescaled light-matter coupling g = eA0 by the factor \(1/\sqrt{L}\), namely, we consider the so-called collective ultra-strong coupling regime48,49,50,51. While this ensures that in the thermodynamic limit a single cavity mode does not affect thermodynamic bulk properties, as we indeed are going to recover, we show here that the topological properties, in particular the emergence of edge modes in the finite-length energy spectrum is strongly modified by the coupling to light.
Energy spectrum of finite-length SSH model coupled to photons
A signature of the non-trivial topology of the SSH model is contained in its finite-length energy spectrum which hosts edge modes exponentially localized near the boundaries52. The first question we address is therefore what is the fate of the edge modes in presence of a finite coupling to the cavity mode. To this extent we study the model within a factorized mean-field ansatz for the ground-state of the form \(\left|{{\Psi }}\right\rangle =\left|\psi \right\rangle \left|\phi \right\rangle\), corresponding to neglecting correlations between the cavity modes and electrons. This ansatz is justified in the limit of large L where electron and photons are expected to decouple. Within this ansatz we obtain (see Methods) a renormalised SSH model with hopping amplitudes v and w dressed by the cavity photon
where we introduced the renormalized hoppings \(\tilde{v}=v\varphi (g,{b}_{0}),\tilde{w}=w\varphi (g,1-{b}_{0})\) with the renormalization factor
and a renormalised mean-field photon Hamiltonian \({H}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{mf}}}}}}}}}\) (see Methods for the complete expression). We find the photonic ground state \(\left|\phi \right\rangle\) and the electronic ground-state \(\left|\psi \right\rangle\) by solving the associated mean-field Hamiltonian self-consistently. We find that the renormalization factor φ(g, ℓ) is purely real, a consequence of the fact that the ground-state of the coupled electron-photon does not carry a finite current.
The finite-sized spectrum of the effective SSH model is plotted in Fig. 2 for different values of the light-matter coupling g and the geometrical factor b0. As expected for g = 0 we find a topological transition for w/v > 1, when a pair of exponentially small almost zero modes appear in the middle of the bulk gap. Upon including a finite light-matter coupling we see that the energy spectrum changes depending on the value of the parameter b0. In particular, for b0 = 0.8 we see that the topological transition is pushed to smaller values of w/v, indicating that coupling to the quantum fluctuation of the light field favor the topological phase. On the other hand, for b0 = 0.2, the situation is reversed and the edge modes appear for larger values of the hopping ratio w/v. This different behavior can be understood by looking at the different photonic renormalization to the hopping integrals, as we are going to discuss further below.
Topological phase diagram
We now turn to discuss the bulk phase diagram of the coupled electron-photon system and the emergence of topological phase transitions. To this extent we consider a system with periodic boundary conditions and no edges. This allows to write the Hamiltonian in momentum space. Introducing the fermionic field \({\psi }_{k}^{{{{\dagger}}} }=\left({c}_{k,A}^{{{{\dagger}}} },{c}_{k,B}^{{{{\dagger}}} }\right)\), the Peierls Hamiltonian in the momentum space can be written in compact form as
where we have introduced an effective single particle electronic Hamiltonian \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{H}}}}}}}}}_{k}(a,{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} })={\sum }_{\alpha }\,{d}_{k\alpha }(a,{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} }){\sigma }_{\alpha }\), with σα=x,y,z Pauli matrices. The structure of this Hamiltonian is encoded in the vector \({d}_{k\alpha }=\left({d}_{kx},{d}_{ky},{d}_{kz}\right)\), which depends on the photonic degrees of freedom, the light-matter coupling and the ratio of lattice spacing, and reads
with \(K=k+\frac{g}{\sqrt{L}}\left(a+{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} }\right)\) the shifted momentum.
For topological systems such as the SSH model the chiral (or sublattice) symmetry plays a pivotal role, protecting the existence of a transition between two insulating phases with different topological properties. In the language of the pseudo-spin components used in Eq. (8) this requires that there is no mass term for the electrons in the A and B sublattices, i.e. dkz = 0. From the structure of the Hamiltonian in momentum space we see therefore that even in presence of quantum light, g ≠ 0, the chiral symmetry is preserved by the Peierls substitution. This ensures the existence of pairs of eigenstates with opposite energies.
In the purely electronic model, corresponding to g = 0, the topological phase transition in the thermodynamic limit would be associated with a closing and reopening of the bulk gap. For a finite-size chain the gap remains finite and the transition point is associated to the minimum energy gap. In presence of light-matter coupling in the collective ultrastrong coupling regime it is important to keep a finite L to obtain non-trivial effects from the photons. As in the previous section, we employ the mean-field approach to calculate the bulk energy spectrum in the presence of the coupling to photons (see Methods). By solving the electronic and photonic mean-field Hamiltonian self-consistently, we find that the photon renormalization to the electronic hoppings are purely real, and the electronic bulk energy spectrum reads
with \(\tilde{v},\tilde{w}\) defined before Eq. (7). The bulk energy gap is given by the value of the dispersion at k = π/L, \({{\Delta }}=\,{{\mbox{min}}}\,{\epsilon }_{k}=\sqrt{{\tilde{v}}^{2}+{\tilde{w}}^{2}-2\tilde{v}\tilde{w}\cos (\pi /L)}\). From this we see that the phase boundary between trivial and topological phases is implicitly given by the equation \(\tilde{w}/\tilde{v}=1\), i.e.
where we emphasize how the renormalization factors depend both on the electronic and photonic parameters, such as light-matter coupling and cavity frequency, as well as the geometric factor b0, through the self-consistent ground state entering Eq. (8).
Solving the photonic and electronic Hamiltonian self-consistently we find numerically the topological phase diagram that we plot for two values of b0 in Fig. 3 (panel (a) b0 = 0.2, panel (b) b0 = 0.8). From this we see, even more clearly, that the light-matter coupling is able to affect the finite-size topological structure of the system. As already observed in the finite-sized edge spectrum, for b0 = 0.2 we see that coupling to quantum light is energetically detrimental and the topological phase of the SSH model is destroyed. Strikingly, we see that for b0 = 0.8 a trivial SSH model can be turned into a topological phase by increasing light-matter interactions. This is one of the main result of this work which opens up the exciting possibility of controlling topology with light. Another interesting aspect is the role played by the geometrical factor b0 in shaping the phase diagram of the system. As we see in Fig. 3, panel (c), also tuning b0 gives rise to different behavior and a possible topological transition. This suggests a comparison with the classical Floquet case28, that we leave for the discussion.
Finally, we discuss the dependence of the critical hopping strength wc from the size of the system L. As we show in panel (d) of Fig. 3 upon increasing L the critical coupling approaches the value wc = v, corresponding to the topological transition in the absence of the cavity (g = 0). This result is consistent with the recent literature stating that single mode cavity are not expected to change bulk properties of the system in the thermodynamic limit47,51,53,54.
Photonic properties
In this section, we focus on the properties of the photonic states coupled to a finite-length SSH chain. In the basis of the Fock states, the photon ground state can be written as \(\left|\phi \right\rangle ={\sum }_{n}{c}_{n}\left|n\right\rangle\), where n denotes the number of photons. The coefficients cn could be found by calculating the eigenvectors of the photonic Hamiltonian \({H}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{mf}}}}}}}}}=\left\langle \psi \right|H\left|\psi \right\rangle\). We find that the coefficients cn corresponding to odd number of photons are zero (see inset in Fig. 4). This reflects a discrete symmetry of the photonic Hamiltonian which in presence of light-matter coupling is invariant under a ↔ − a, rather than under a fully phase rotation. This symmetry is protected by the absence of an electronic current in the ground-state, and thus of superradiance, which otherwise would generate terms linear in the photonic field and non-symmetric. Furthermore, as we are going to see it implies squeezing. To this extent we introduce the position \(X=\left(a+{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} }\right)/\sqrt{2}\) and momentum \(P=-i\left(a-{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} }\right)/\sqrt{2}\) operators. For a bare photonic Hamiltonian Eq. (2), the expectation values of the X2 and P2 operators are equal, 〈X2〉 = 〈P2〉 = 1/2. However, for a single mode photonic Hamiltonian coupled to the SSH chain we find that 〈P2〉 > 〈X2〉, therefore, photonic state becomes squeezed (see Fig. 4). We can understood this behavior from the form of the effective photonic Hamiltonian (see Methods) for large L and from the fact that, as we said, there is no coherent displacement induced by the electrons i.e.
where the squeezing parameter r is controlled by the renormalized kinetic energy of the SSH chain (see Methods).
Polariton spectrum as signature of topological phase transition
Finally, we conclude discussing how the light emitted from the cavity, encoded in the photonic spectral function and measurable through transmission/reflection experiments55,56,57, contains crucial signatures of the topological phase transition in the SSH system. The excitations of the SSH chain coupled to a cavity mode are hybrid light-matter polariton quasiparticles whose energies and lifetime can be read out from the photonic spectral function. This strongly depends on the topological properties of the underlying electronic system. Here we show in particular that at the topological transition one polariton mode is pushed to zero frequency and loses spectral weight, thus leaving only two peaks in the spectral function. Specifically we consider the photon spectral function \(A(\omega )=-\frac{1}{\pi }\,{{\mbox{Im}}}\,\int dt{e}^{-i\omega t}\left(-i\theta (t)\right)\langle \left[a(t),{a}^{{{{\dagger}}} }\right]\rangle\), dressed by the electronic system including 1/L Gaussian fluctuations47,58. This can be written as
where χ(ω) = K(ω) − 〈Jd〉 is the current-current correlation function that is a sum of paramagnetic and diamagnetic contributions (see Methods),
We show the behavior of the photonic spectral function in the top panel of Fig. 5. In the previous section, we have demonstrated that in the thermodynamic limit the topological phase transition point remains unchanged by the cavity photons even in the (ultra)strong coupling limit and takes place when v = w. Let us first consider the behavior of the spectral function in the trivial phase (v > w). In the absence of the coupling to the cavity there is only one peak in the spectral function at ωc. Since we fixed the system parameters such that ωc is equal to the band gap 2E(k), where E(k) is the electronic bulk energy spectrum given by Eq. (12) in the absence of coupling to cavity, in the SSH model at k = 0, for finite values of g the peak at ωc in the spectral function splits into two. Moreover, there is a third peak appearing in A(ω) coming from the band gap at k = π. Therefore, there are three peaks in A(ω) corresponding to three polariton branches. As we fix the parameters of the SSH chain such that v = w, the lowest polariton branch disappears. This is related to closing of the bulk gap at k = 0 and is a direct signature of the topological phase transition. Decreasing the intracell hopping v further the SSH model enters the topological phase (v < w) and the lowest polariton branch reemerges. To better illustrate the disappearance of the polariton branch at the topological phase transition we plot the cross section of the spectral function for a fixed value of the light-matter coupling constant g = 2 as a function of frequency in the lower panel of Fig. 5. We note in passing that the width of the second polariton branch is larger in the topological phase.
We provide a simple analytical argument to understand the disappearance of the lowest polariton branch at the phase transition. First, we note that the light-matter Hamiltonian in Eq. (8), when written in terms of pseudo-spin operators \({\sigma }_{\alpha }^{k}={\psi }_{k}^{{{{\dagger}}} }{\sigma }_{\alpha }{\psi }_{k}\), takes the form of a spin-photon problem often encountered in quantum optics. Here, however, pseudo-spins at different k points are coupled to the same cavity mode. The lowest excitations of the system can be then obtained from a spin-wave analysis focusing on the k = 0 sector of the SSH model (see Methods). This allows to write down an effective Hamiltonian in terms of bosonic spin-wave modes b (b†) coupled to cavity photons
where ωx = 2∣v − w∣ and s = sign[v − w]. We find the analytical expression for the polariton energies by using the Bogoliubov-Hopfield transformation59
where \({\tilde{\omega }}_{c}=\sqrt{{\omega }_{c}({\omega }_{c}-2ws{g}^{2})}\). Next, we note that at v = w the lower polariton branch ω− = 0 is absent, and the upper polariton frequency is given by \({\omega }_{+}=\sqrt{{\omega }_{c}^{2}-2{\omega }_{c}{g}^{2}w}\). In agreement with the spectral function calculations, the lower polariton branch disappears at the phase transition point providing a way to probe the phase transition point in the SSH model via cavity response measurements.
Conclusions
In this work, we have shown that coupling an electronic system to the quantum light field of a cavity can be used to control the topological properties of a system and most notably to drive a topological transition with the emergence of edge modes, even in a regime where the uncoupled system would be topologically trivial. We have highlighted these results in the context of paradigmatic model for topological phases of matter, the SSH chain, that we have studied in presence of a finite coupling to a single-mode cavity encoded in the gauge-invariant Peierls phase.
We have shown that quantum light-matter coupling does not spoil the chiral symmetry, which protects the topological phase in the isolated SSH chain and furthermore introduces a non-trivial dependence from the ratio of lattice spacing which can be used as further controlled parameter to control the phase diagram of the system together with the light-matter coupling. Computing the finite-length energy spectrum as well as the bulk spectrum using a mean-field decoupling of electrons and photons, which treats the Peierls phase non-perturbatively, we have shown that light-matter interaction can turn a trivial insulator into a topological one, depending on the value of b0. Our work therefore provides a simple and paradigmatic example of non-trivial topology induced by quantum light. We emphasize that with respect to the largely explored Floquet engineering schemes, where classical oscillating light fields are used to induce non-trivial topology, our scheme does not suffer from any heating problem, an issue which requires in the Floquet context to assume high-frequency driving.
Finally, we found that in the thermodynamic limit the topological phase transition point v = w in the SSH model is insensitive to cavity photons. In this limit, we evaluated the polariton spectrum of the hybrid electron-photon system that revealed the appearance of three polariton branches for v ≠ w. Interestingly, we noticed that the lowest polariton branch disappears exactly at the topological phase transition point v = w, the result which was further supported by the full analytical solution within the effective spin-wave theory. Therefore, cavity photons provide a way to both control and probe topological properties of the electronic systems. In future works, it would be interesting to consider inhomogeneous electromagnetic field, recently utizlized in the context of superradiance46,60,61, since a momentum-dependent photonic operators might bring a new ingredient to control topological properties of the material.
Methods
Gauge-fixing of electrons coupled to quantum light
In this section we derive the Peierls Hamiltonian used in the main text by means of a unitary transformation acting on the electrons. Starting from the operator Ω defined in Eq. (4) of the main text we see that the fermionic operators transform as
where Riμ = ia0 + δμ,Bb0. Applying this unitary operator to the SSH Hamiltonian generates an electron-photon Hamiltonian
which is equivalent to a renormalization of the hopping integrals according to the Peierls phase, i.e.
which reduces to the result in the main text for a0 = 1 and \(g=g/\sqrt{L}\). Furthermore, using the same unitary operator Ω it is possible to write down the light-matter Hamiltonian in the dipole gauge. This reads
Mean-field decoupling between electrons and photons in finite-length SSH chain coupled to photons
We provide details on the solution of the light-matter Hamiltonian H Eq. (5) in mean field that corresponds to neglecting correlations between the cavity modes \(\left|\phi \right\rangle\) and electrons \(\left|\psi \right\rangle\),
As a result of the mean field decoupling we have to solve an electronic mean field Hamiltonian given by Eq. (6) and a photonic mean field Hamiltonian that reads
where we introduced two parameters
We find the electronic spectrum of the SSH model in presence of coupling to cavity photons by solving Eqs. (6) and (25) self-consistently. In particular, we set g = 0 in \({H}_{{{{{{{{\rm{el}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{mf}}}}}}}}}\) and calculate numerically \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}}}}}_{AB}^{\gamma }\), where γ = jj or j, j + 1. Then we insert \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{C}}}}}}}}}_{AB}^{\gamma }\) into \({H}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{mf}}}}}}}}}\) with g ≠ 0, and evaluate \(\tilde{v}\) and \(\tilde{w}\). Afterwards, we insert \(\tilde{v}\) and \(\tilde{w}\) (calculated for g ≠ 0) into \({H}_{{{{{{{{\rm{el}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{mf}}}}}}}}}\) and evaluate the eigenvalues of the electronic mean-field Hamiltonian. We find that the energy spectrum of the SSH chain is modified in presence of coupling to cavity photons (Fig. 2).
Mean-field solution of momentum space Hamiltonian
In order to obtain the topological phase diagram we study the SSH model coupled to cavity in momentum space. Starting from Eq. (5) and performing the Fourier transformation as \({c}_{j,\mu }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}{\sum }_{k}{e}^{ikj}{c}_{k,\mu }\), we arrive at the Peierls Hamiltonian in the momentum space given by Eq. (8). Similarly to the finite-length SSH chain, we solve Eq. (8) within a mean field approximation. The electronic mean-field Hamiltonian reads
where we introduced the pseudo-spin operators
and
At zero temperature, we find for the expectation values over the electronic states
where we introduced the energy of the SSH model in presence of cavity fields
Similarly, the photonic mean-field Hamiltonian reads
In the thermodynamic limit, retaining only the leading terms we obtain Eq. (14) of the main text, with a squeezing parameter r given by
Photonic Green’s function—Gaussian fluctuations
In this Section, we compute the Gaussian 1/L corrections to the photon Green’s function47,58. For the sake of simplicity we consider the SSH model with b0 = 0, since the results do not change qualitatively with b0 in the large L limit. The partition function of the SSH model can be written as
where we separated the different contributions to the total action S: Sph describes to the photonic fields, Sel corresponds to the purely electronic system, and Sel-ph describes to the electron-photon interaction,
Here, \(\left({\phi }^{* }(\tau ),\phi (\tau )\right)\) correspond to the photonic fields, and
Defining
the partition function can be rewritten as
where
Expanding the action of the SSH model coupled to a single mode cavity up to second order in photonic fields ϕ(τ), we arrive at
where \({{{\Phi }}}^{{{{\dagger}}} }(\tau )=\left({\phi }^{* }(\tau ),\phi (\tau )\right)\), \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{D}}}}}}}}}_{0}^{-1}(\tau -\tau ^{\prime} )\) is the bare photon Green’s function, and \({{\Pi }}(\tau -\tau ^{\prime} )\) is the polarization given by
Next, we find that all four components of the polarization are equal and can be written as
where χ(ω) is the current-current correlation function defined in the main text.
Using Eqs. (16)–(18) and substitution sum with an integral, we find the expressions for the real
and imaginary parts of the correlation function χ(ω)
Spin-wave theory for polariton spectrum
In this Section, we derive the spin-wave spectrum of the polaritons. To this extent we start from Eq. (8) that we rewrite in terms of the pseudo-spin operators defined in Eq. (29). Then, considering only the momentum k = 0 and expanding to second order in g, we obtain
where ωx = 2∣v − w∣ and s = sign[v − w]. Performing Holstein—Primakoff transformation47,62
we arrive at Eq. (19). We find analytical expression for the polariton energies Eq. (20) by performing the Bogoliubov-Hopfield transformation59.
Since we consider only k = 0 mode, it turns out that ω− always go to zero for v ≠ w at the critical value of the light-matter coupling \({g}_{c}=\left|v-w\right|\sqrt{{\omega }_{c}}/\sqrt{2vw| v-w| }\). We note that the same softening of the lower polariton branch was observed in the case of the excitonic insulator coupled to light using the Peierls substitution47 and is absent when all momentum k are taken into account.
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request from the authors.
Code availability
All numerical codes in this paper are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
References
Basov, D. N., Averitt, R. D. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077–1088 (2017).
Disa, A. S., Nova, T. F. & Cavalleri, A. Engineering crystal structures with light. Nat. Phys. 17, 1087–1092 (2021).
Ruggenthaler, M., Tancogne-Dejean, N., Flick, J., Appel, H. & Rubio, A. From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 0118 (2018).
Schlawin, F., Kennes, D. M. & Sentef, M. A. Cavity quantum materials. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.15018 (2021).
Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Ciuti, C. & Ebbesen, T. W. Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields. Science 373, eabd0336 (2021).
Valmorra, F. et al. Vacuum-field-induced thz transport gap in a carbon nanotube quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 12, 5490 (2021).
Bloch, J., Cavalleri, A., Galitski, V., Hafezi, M. & Rubio, A. Strongly correlated electron–photon systems. Nature 606, 41–48 (2022).
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: topological insulators. Rev. Modern Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Modern Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406 (2009).
Lindner, N. H., Refael, G. & Galitski, V. Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 7, 490–495 (2011).
Wang, Y. H., Steinberg, H., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator. Science 342, 453–457 (2013).
McIver, J. W. et al. Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 38–41 (2020).
Cooper, N. R., Dalibard, J. & Spielman, I. B. Topological bands for ultracold atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019).
Karzig, T., Bardyn, C.-E., Lindner, N. H. & Refael, G. Topological polaritons. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031001 (2015).
Ohm, C. & Hassler, F. Microwave readout of majorana qubits. Phys. Rev. B 91, 085406 (2015).
Trif, M. & Tserkovnyak, Y. Resonantly tunable majorana polariton in a microwave cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 257002 (2012).
Contamin, L. C., Delbecq, M. R., Douçot, B., Cottet, A. & Kontos, T. Hybrid light-matter networks of majorana zero modes. npj Quant. Inform. 7, 171 (2021).
Méndez-Córdoba, F. P. M. et al. Rényi entropy singularities as signatures of topological criticality in coupled photon-fermion systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043264 (2020).
Hübener, H. et al. Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities. Nat. Mater. 20, 438–442 (2021).
Rokaj, V., Penz, M., Sentef, M. A., Ruggenthaler, M. & Rubio, A. Polaritonic hofstadter butterfly and cavity control of the quantized hall conductance. Phys. Rev. B 105, 205424 (2022).
Wang, X., Ronca, E. & Sentef, M. A. Cavity quantum electrodynamical chern insulator: towards light-induced quantized anomalous Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 99, 235156 (2019).
Appugliese, F. et al. Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect. Science 375, 1030–1034 (2022).
Roux, K., Konishi, H., Helson, V. & Brantut, J.-P. Strongly correlated fermions strongly coupled to light. Nat. Commun. 11, 2974 (2020).
Mivehvar, F., Ritsch, H. & Piazza, F. Superradiant topological peierls insulator inside an optical cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 073602 (2017).
Su, W., Schrieffer, J. & Heeger, A. J. Solitons in polyacetylene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
Delplace, P., Ullmo, D. & Montambaux, G. Zak phase and the existence of edge states in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 84, 195452 (2011).
Gómez-León, A. & Platero, G. Floquet-Bloch theory and topology in periodically driven lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 200403 (2013).
Dal Lago, V., Atala, M. & Foa Torres, L. E. F. Floquet topological transitions in a driven one-dimensional topological insulator. Phys. Rev. A 92, 023624 (2015).
Goren, T., Plekhanov, K., Appas, F. & Le Hur, K. Topological Zak phase in strongly coupled LC circuits. Phys. Rev. B 97, 041106 (2018).
Downing, C. A., Sturges, T. J., Weick, G., Stobińska, M. & Martín-Moreno, L. Topological phases of polaritons in a cavity waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 217401 (2019).
Nie, W., Antezza, M., Liu, Y.-x & Nori, F. Dissipative topological phase transition with strong system-environment coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 250402 (2021).
Pérez-González, B., Gómez-León, Á. & Platero, G. Topology detection in cavity QED. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 15860–15870 (2022).
Atala, M. et al. Direct measurement of the zak phase in topological bloch bands. Nat. Phys. 9, 795–800 (2013).
Meier, E. J., An, F. A. & Gadway, B. Observation of the topological soliton state in the su–schrieffer–heeger model. Nat. Commun. 7, 13986 (2016).
de Léséleuc, S. et al. Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms. Science 365, 775–780 (2019).
Rizzo, D. J. et al. Topological band engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 560, 204–208 (2018).
Gröning, O. et al. Engineering of robust topological quantum phases in graphene nanoribbons. Nature 560, 209–213 (2018).
Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).
Solnyshkov, D. D. et al. Microcavity polaritons for topological photonics. Opt. Mater. Express 11, 1119–1142 (2021).
Kim, E. et al. Quantum electrodynamics in a topological waveguide. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011015 (2021).
Huber, S. D. Topological mechanics. Nature Physics 12, 621–623 (2016).
Li, J. et al. Electromagnetic coupling in tight-binding models for strongly correlated light and matter. Phys. Rev. B 101, 205140 (2020).
Sentef, M. A., Li, J., Künzel, F. & Eckstein, M. Quantum to classical crossover of Floquet engineering in correlated quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033033 (2020).
Li, J. & Eckstein, M. Manipulating intertwined orders in solids with quantum light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 217402 (2020).
Guerci, D., Simon, P. & Mora, C. Superradiant phase transition in electronic systems and emergent topological phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 257604 (2020).
Dmytruk, O. & Schiró, M. Gauge fixing for strongly correlated electrons coupled to quantum light. Phys. Rev. B 103, 075131 (2021).
Ciuti, C., Bastard, G. & Carusotto, I. Quantum vacuum properties of the intersubband cavity polariton field. Phys. Rev. B 72, 115303 (2005).
Frisk Kockum, A., Miranowicz, A., De Liberato, S., Savasta, S. & Nori, F. Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19–40 (2019).
Pilar, P., De Bernardis, D. & Rabl, P. Thermodynamics of ultrastrongly coupled light-matter systems. Quantum 4, 335 (2020).
Eckhardt, C. J. et al. Quantum floquet engineering with an exactly solvable tight-binding chain in a cavity. Commun. Phys. 5, 122 (2022).
Asbóth, J. K., Oroszlány, L. & Pályi, A. A short course on topological insulators. Lect. Notes Phys. 919, 166 (2016).
Andolina, G., Pellegrino, F., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. & Polini, M. Cavity quantum electrodynamics of strongly correlated electron systems: A no-go theorem for photon condensation. Phys. Rev. B 100, 121109 (R) (2019).
Amelio, I., Korosec, L., Carusotto, I. & Mazza, G. Optical dressing of the electronic response of two-dimensional semiconductors in quantum and classical descriptions of cavity electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. B 104, 235120 (2021).
Schiró, M. & Le Hur, K. Tunable hybrid quantum electrodynamics from nonlinear electron transport. Phys. Rev. B 89, 195127 (2014).
Dmytruk, O., Trif, M., Mora, C. & Simon, P. Out-of-equilibrium quantum dot coupled to a microwave cavity. Phys. Rev. B 93, 075425 (2016).
Cottet, A. et al. Cavity QED with hybrid nanocircuits: from atomic-like physics to condensed matter phenomena. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 433002 (2017).
Mazza, G. & Georges, A. Superradiant quantum materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017401 (2019).
De Liberato, S. Light-matter decoupling in the deep strong coupling regime: the breakdown of the Purcell effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 016401 (2014).
Nataf, P., Champel, T., Blatter, G. & Basko, D. M. Rashba cavity QED: a route towards the superradiant quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 207402 (2019).
Andolina, G., Pellegrino, F., Giovannetti, V., MacDonald, A. & Polini, M. Theory of photon condensation in a spatially varying electromagnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 102, 125137 (2020).
Lerose, A., Žunkovič, B., Marino, J., Gambassi, A. & Silva, A. Impact of nonequilibrium fluctuations on prethermal dynamical phase transitions in long-range interacting spin chains. Phys. Rev. B 99, 045128 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 892800 and from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 101002955—CONQUER).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
O.D. carried out the numerical and analytical calculations. O.D. and M.S. analyzed the data, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks Hang Xie and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dmytruk, O., Schirò, M. Controlling topological phases of matter with quantum light. Commun Phys 5, 271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01049-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01049-0
This article is cited by
-
Cavity-renormalized quantum criticality in a honeycomb bilayer antiferromagnet
Communications Physics (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.