Abstract
All attempts to identify male-specific growth genes in humans have failed. This study aimed to clarify why men are taller than women. Microarray-based transcriptome analysis of the cartilage tissues of four adults and chondrocytes of 12 children showed that the median expression levels of SHOX, a growth gene in the pseudoautosomal region (PAR), were higher in male samples than in female samples. Male-dominant SHOX expression was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR for 36 cartilage samples. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing of four cartilage samples revealed sex-biased DNA methylation in the SHOX-flanking regions, and pyrosequencing of 22 cartilage samples confirmed male-dominant DNA methylation at the CpG sites in the SHOX upstream region and exon 6a. DNA methylation indexes of these regions were positively correlated with SHOX expression levels. These results, together with prior findings that PAR genes often exhibit male-dominant expression, imply that the relatively low SHOX expression in female cartilage tissues reflects the partial spread of X chromosome inactivation into PAR. Altogether, this study provides the first indication that sex differences in height are ascribed, at least in part, to the sex-dependent epigenetic regulation of SHOX. Our findings deserve further validation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mean adult height of men is ~ 13 cm greater than that of women1,2. This sexual dimorphism is primarily ascribed to the effects of sex hormones and sex chromosomal genes1. Considering that individuals with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis are in general ~ 8 cm taller than those with 46,XX gonadal dysgenesis1, sex chromosomal genes likely play a more prominent role in male-dominant growth than sex hormones. To date, however, all attempts to identify a male-specific growth gene have failed. Actually, no major growth gene has been identified on the human sex chromosomes, except for SHOX which resides in the short arm pseudoautosomal region (PAR1) of the X and Y chromosomes3,4. SHOX encodes a regulator of chondrocyte development, and its haploinsufficiency typically causes a height reduction of more than 10 cm4,5. SHOX was assumed to exert equivalent beneficial effects on the growth of men and women, because all PAR1 genes, including SHOX, were believed to escape X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and show biallelic expression in both 46,XX and 46,XY cells3,6.
In the present study, we tested a new hypothesis that SHOX undergoes sex-dependent epigenetic regulation. This hypothesis is based on the previous findings by Tukiainen et al. that the average transcript levels of PAR1 genes in various female tissues were lower than those in male tissues7. Tukiainen et al. proposed that the male-dominant expression of PAR1 genes reflects the partial spread of XCI into PAR1, because (i) transcript levels of these genes from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) accounted for only ~ 80% of those from the active X chromosome (Xa), and (ii) PAR1 genes were not up- or down-regulated on the Y chromosome (Y). However, Tukiainen et al. did not analyze transcript levels in cartilage tissues or chondrocytes. Moreover, the authors did not investigate DNA methylation profiles, even though XCI is known to alter DNA methylation profiles of target genes8. For example, Cotton et al. have reported that the average methylation rates of the promoter/enhancer regions of XCI-subject and -escape genes on Xi were 70% and 11% respectively, whereas those of gene bodies were 64% and 75% respectively8. In the present study, we analyzed transcript levels and DNA methylation profiles of X chromosomal genes, including SHOX, in the cartilage tissues and chondrocytes of men and women.
Results
Microarray-based transcriptome analysis of X chromosomal genes
We first examined sex differences in transcript levels of X chromosomal genes. Microarray-based transcriptome analysis was performed using knee cartilage tissues obtained from four adults (two women and two men) and cultured chondrocytes established from the fingers of 12 children (six girls and six boys) (Supplementary Table S1 online). The results showed relatively high expression of PAR1 genes in the male samples, together with the female-dominant expression of known XCI-escape genes in the X-differential region (Fig. 1a). These data are consistent with the previous report by Tukiainen et al.7 Since SHOX did not pass the filtering criteria due to low expression levels in some samples, we analyzed the data manually. The results showed that the median SHOX expression levels were higher in the male samples than those in the female samples albeit not reaching statistical significance (Fig. 1b).
RT-qPCR analysis of SHOX
To validate the results of the microarray-based transcriptome analysis, we performed RT-qPCR analysis of SHOX using knee cartilage tissues obtained from 22 adolescent/adults (11 women and 11 men) and digit cartilage tissues obtained from 14 children (five girls and nine boys). Relative SHOX expression levels were lower in the digit cartilage tissues than in the knee cartilage tissues. In both groups, the median values of relative SHOX expression were higher in the male samples than in the female samples (Fig. 1c). The differences in knee cartilage samples reached statistical significance. No correlation was observed between SHOX expression levels and height in five children (Supplementary Fig. S1 online), while height data of other individuals were not available.
DNA methylation analyses of X chromosomal genes
Next, we analyzed DNA methylation profiles of X chromosomal genes. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed using four knee cartilage tissues obtained from adults (two women and two men). RRBS is a method to assess DNA methylation profiles of CpG-rich genomic regions9. The results showed that most CpG sites in the X-differential region were more methylated in the female samples than in the male samples, whereas such female-dominant DNA methylation was not apparent for CpG sites in PAR1 (Fig. 2a). Of note, we detected sex differences in the methylation indexes of three CpG clusters around SHOX (Fig. 2a). Specifically, male-dominant DNA methylation was observed in a 3.2 kb region that is 3.9 kb upstream of SHOX (chrX:578,055–581,224; GRCh37/hg19) and a 1.9 kb region in intron 5–exon 6a (chrX:604,185–606,039), whereas female-dominant DNA methylation was detected in a 1.2 kb region in intron 2 (chrX:592,562–593,801) (Fig. 2a).
To validate the results of RRBS, we conducted pyrosequencing of 16 CpG sites in the SHOX-flanking regions of 22 knee cartilage tissues. The results showed little sex difference in the DNA methylation of CpG sites in intron 2 (Fig. 2b). In contrast, DNA methylation patterns in the upstream region and exon 6a were consistent with the results of RRBS. The average DNA methylation indexes of CpG sites in these regions were invariably lower in the female samples than in the male samples (Fig. 2b). DNA methylation indexes of CpG sites in the upstream region and exon 6a were positively correlated with SHOX expression levels (Fig. 2c).
Discussion
This study showed male-dominant SHOX expression in cartilage tissues and chondrocytes. The sex differences reached statistical significance in knee cartilage tissues (Fig. 1c). The lack of statistical significance in the child cartilage samples appears to reflect the small sample size and low SHOX expression levels (Fig. 1b,c). Since SHOX is known to facilitate growth in a dosage-sensitive manner4, relatively low SHOX expression in female cartilage tissues likely contributes to the relatively short stature of women. This speculation is supported by the fact that female patients with SHOX haploinsufficiency usually manifest more severe phenotypes than male patients4,5,10. Moreover, the similar phenotypes of male patients with SHOX defects on X and Y (Supplementary Table S2 online) suggest that in men, SHOX is equally expressed from the two sex chromosomes. The lack of SHOX orthologs in rodents and several other species3 may explain why sex-biased expression of Shox has not been reported to date. Notably, we observed relatively large variations in SHOX expression levels in both the male and female groups. Such variations may contribute to interindividual height variations within the same sex. However, since the height data of most participants were unavailable, this notion needs to be examined in future studies.
Microarray-based transcriptome analysis of cartilage tissues showed that most PAR1 genes, including SHOX, were more strongly expressed in the male samples than in the female samples. These results are consistent with previous data obtained from other tissues7, and support the notion that PAR1 genes are subjected to partial XCI. Notably, RRBS showed sex-biased DNA methylation at the SHOX-flanking CpG sites, and pyrosequencing confirmed male-dominant DNA methylation in the SHOX upstream region and exon 6a. The hypomethylation of exon 6a in the female samples can be regarded as a sign of XCI-subject genes, because previous studies have shown that Xa of women and the single X of men have similar DNA methylation profiles11 and that XCI-subject genes on Xi typically exhibit relative hypomethylation in gene bodies8,12. Likewise, male-dominant DNA methylation in the upstream region is consistent with the previous findings that intergenic CpG sites on Xa are usually more methylated than those on Xi8. Moreover, we found that SHOX expression levels were positively correlated with DNA methylation indexes at CpG sites in the upstream region and exon 6. Thus, DNA methylation of these CpG sites may be a part of the epigenetic regulation of SHOX. Altogether, our data argue for the partial XCI on SHOX. This assumption is supported by the previous findings by Sun et al. that two women with extremely skewed XCI manifested diverse phenotypes despite having the same heterozygous SHOX deletion13. Given the small number of our subjects, the results of this study need to be validated in future studies. Moreover, it is necessary to clarify allele-specific DNA methylation profiles of SHOX-flanking CpG sites in male and female samples.
Conclusions
This study suggests the male-dominant expression and sex-biased DNA methylation of SHOX in cartilage tissues and chondrocytes, which possibly reflects incomplete spread of XCI into PAR1. Such sex-dependent epigenetic regulation of SHOX likely contributes to sex differences in adult height. Our findings deserve further validation.
Methods
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Committee at the National Center for Child Health and Development (project #1763). Written informed consent was obtained from the sample donors and/or their parents. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
The target gene SHOX
This study primarily focused on SHOXa, the major transcript of SHOX (NM_000451.3). SHOXa consists of exons 1–6a and resides at chrX:585,079–607,558 and chrY:535,079–557,558 (GRCh37/hg19). Although previous studies have identified several splice variants of SHOX, all of these variants except for SHOXa are of unknown clinical importance14.
Human samples
Human samples analyzed in this study are summarized in Supplementary Table S1 online. The samples were obtained from unrelated individuals. First, we analyzed postmortem cartilage tissues obtained from the knee joints of 22 adolescent/adults (11 women and 11 men). These samples were purchased from Articular Engineering (Catalog IDs, CDD-H-6000-N-1G-R and CDD-H-6000-N-1G-F; Northbrook, IL, USA). The donors of these samples died of trauma or non-endocrine disorders (Supplementary Table S1 online). The samples were either frozen (n = 6) or stored in the RNAlater reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (n = 16).
Second, we examined cartilage tissues and cultured chondrocytes obtained from 26 healthy children (11 girls and 15 boys). These samples were collected at our hospital during surgery for polydactyly. Of these, 14 cartilage tissues from five girls and nine boys were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after surgery. The remaining 12 cartilage tissues from six girls and six boys were subjected to cartilage culture. The cartilage tissues were pulverized and cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium containing 17% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. We confirmed that the cells had chondrocyte-compatible morphological characteristics15,16 and expressed COL2A1, a marker of chondrocytes.
Total RNA and genomic DNA extraction
Total RNA of cartilage tissues was extracted using CRYO-PRESS (Microtec, Funabashi, Japan) and the TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and that of cultured cells was obtained using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal kit or the miRNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The extracted RNA samples were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Genomic DNA samples of cartilage tissues were extracted using the Gentra Puregene kit (QIAGEN).
Primer information
Primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S3 online.
Microarray-based transcriptome analysis of X chromosomal genes
Transcriptome analyses were performed for cartilage tissues of adults (two women and two men) and cultured chondrocytes of children (six girls and six boys) using catalog one-color microarrays (SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression microarray, 8 × 60 k format; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The data were analyzed using GeneSpring software (version 14.9, Agilent Technologies). Data were normalized as follows; (i) the 75th percentile value of logarithmically transformed signal intensities within each sample was specified; and (ii) the 75th percentile value was subtracted from the logarithmically transformed signal intensity of each probe. We focused on X chromosomal genes known to escape XCI. Transcripts with low expression levels and low signal quality were filtered out using Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies). Specifically, we excluded probes that were assessed as “not uniform,” “saturated,” or “population outliers” in one or more of the tested samples. We also excluded probes that were “not significant” or “not above background” in one or more samples of both sex groups. The female-male ratio at each transcript level was calculated by subtracting the average value of logarithmically transformed signal intensities in the female samples from that in the male samples. Since SHOX expression levels were low in some samples, we analyzed its data manually.
RT-qPCR analysis of SHOX
SHOX expression levels in the cartilage tissues of 22 adolescent/adults (11 women and 11 men) and 14 children (five girls and nine boys) were analyzed by RT-qPCR. The transcript corresponding to exons 5 and 6a of SHOX (assay ID, Hs00757861_m1; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was quantified using TaqMan assays on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). SHOX expression levels were calculated using the ΔΔ-Ct method against two internal control genes, TBP (assay ID, Hs00427620_m1) and GUSB (assay ID, Hs00939627_m1). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.
RRBS of X chromosomal genes
We performed RRBS of cartilage tissues obtained from four adults (two women and two men), to examine sex differences in the DNA methylation profile of X chromosomal genes. RRBS libraries were prepared according to the standard methods with some modifications17,18. Our original protocol started with the sonication of genomic DNA samples, as we found that this process increases the yield after bead purification. The sonication was performed using a Covaris Focused-ultrasonicator S220 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) with a peak incident power of 140 W, a duty cycle of 2%, and a duration of 1 s. The sonicated DNA samples were treated with proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and RNase A (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Subsequently, the samples were bead-purified, digested with MspI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), subjected to gap filling and A-tailing with a Klenow fragment (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and ligated with the NEBNext methylated adaptor (New England BioLabs). The adaptor-ligated DNA samples were subjected to bisulfite conversion using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and amplified by PCR with the KAPA HiFi HotStart Uracil + ReadyMix kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The libraries were subjected to 150-bp paired-end sequencing on a NextSeq sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
Sequence reads were mapped to the human reference genome for bisulfite sequencing (CT-converted hs37d5) using the Bismark program19. Adaptor trimming and quality control were performed using Trim Galore software (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore). The methylation index of each CpG site was calculated using the methylKit package (v.1.10.0) in R20. We excluded CpG sites whose read depth was < 10 in any of the tested samples. We also excluded constantly hypermethylated CpG sites with methylation indexes of > 80% in all samples, because this study focused on differentially methylated CpG sites that are possibly involved in epigenetic gene regulation. Sex differences in DNA methylation statuses were calculated by subtracting the mean methylation index of the male samples from that of the female samples.
Pyrosequencing of SHOX-flanking CpG sites
To validate the results of RRBS, we performed pyrosequencing of the SHOX-flanking CpG sites using knee cartilage tissues from 22 adolescent/adults (11 women and 11 men). Genomic DNA samples were treated with bisulfite using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Zymo Research). Three genomic intervals encompassing CpG clusters (chrX:580,908–581,116, 593,482–593,694, and 605,642–605,771) were PCR-amplified and subjected to pyrosequencing on PyroMark Q24 (QIAGEN). We analyzed methylation indexes of 16 CpG sites (seven in the upstream region, five in intron 2, and four in intron 5–exon 6a).
Statistical analyses
We conducted Wilcoxon rank sum tests for the results of RT-qPCR. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. To evaluate the correlations between the average DNA methylation indexes in the three SHOX-flanking regions and SHOX expression levels, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficients and P values. Samples in which SHOX expression was not detected by RT-qPCR were excluded from statistical analysis. We performed two-tailed Student’s t-tests to examine sex differences in the DNA methylation indexes of the 16 CpG sites in the SHOX-flanking regions. Considering that our pyrosequencing analysis targeted 16 CpG sites, we applied the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. P values less than 0.0031 (0.05 divided by 16) were considered to be statistically significant.
Data availability
All raw and processed microarray and sequencing data generated in this study are available at the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus with the accession number GSE188531. The data will be open to the public after the manuscript is accepted.
References
Ogata, T. & Matsuo, N. Sex chromosome aberrations and stature: Deduction of the principal factors involved in the determination of adult height. Hum. Genet. 91, 551–562 (1993).
Naqvi, S. et al. Conservation, acquisition, and functional impact of sex-biased gene expression in mammals. Science 365, eaaw7317 (2019).
Rao, E. et al. Pseudoautosomal deletions encompassing a novel homeobox gene cause growth failure in idiopathic short stature and Turner syndrome. Nat. Genet. 16, 54–63 (1997).
Marchini, A., Ogata, T. & Rappold, G. A. A track record on SHOX: From basic research to complex models and therapy. Endocr. Rev. 37, 417–448 (2016).
Kosho, T. et al. Skeletal features and growth patterns in 14 patients with haploinsufficiency of SHOX: Implications for the development of Turner syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 4613–4621 (1999).
Balaton, B. P. & Brown, C. J. Escape artists of the X chromosome. Trends Genet. 32, 348–359 (2016).
Tukiainen, T. et al. Landscape of X chromosome inactivation across human tissues. Nature 550, 244–248 (2017).
Cotton, A. M. et al. Landscape of DNA methylation on the X chromosome reflects CpG density, functional chromatin state and X-chromosome inactivation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 1528–1539 (2015).
Meissner, A. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 33, 5868–5877 (2005).
Munns, C. F. J. et al. Familial growth and skeletal features associated with SHOX haploinsufficiency. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 16, 987–996 (2003).
Hellman, A. & Chess, A. Gene body-specific methylation on the active X chromosome. Science 315, 1141–1143 (2007).
Ball, M. P. et al. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 361–368 (2009).
Sun, Z. & Bernstein, E. Histone variant macroH2A: From chromatin deposition to molecular function. Essays Biochem. 63, 59–74 (2019).
Durand, C. et al. Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated RNA decay contribute to the regulation of SHOX expression. PLoS ONE 6, e18115 (2011).
Nasu, M., Takayama, S. & Umezawa, A. Endochondral ossification model system: Designed cell fate of human epiphyseal chondrocytes during long-term implantation. J. Cell. Physiol. 230, 1376–1388 (2015).
Nasu, M., Takayama, S. & Umezawa, A. Efficiency of human epiphyseal chondrocytes with differential replication numbers for cellular therapy products. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 1–13 (2016).
Boyle, P. et al. Gel-free multiplexed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for large-scale DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biol. 13, R92 (2012).
Matsushita, J. et al. The DNA methylation profile of liver tumors in C3H mice and identification of differentially methylated regions involved in the regulation of tumorigenic genes. BMC Cancer 18, 317 (2018).
Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: A flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).
Akalin, A. et al. methylKit: A comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 13, R87 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ms. Ikuko Kageyama for her technical assistance and Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Funding
This study is funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K15932 (to A.H.), the National Center for Child Health and Development (to M.F.), the Canon Foundation (to M.F.), the Japan Endocrine Society (to M.F.), and the Takeda Science Foundation (to M.F.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AH and MF designed the study. AS, NI, KTat, YN, MN, TM, AN, and AU contributed to sample preparation. AH, KN, KTak, KI, and YK-F conducted experiments. AH, KN, KI, KM, and KO contributed to data acquisition and analyses. AH, TO, MK, and MF contributed to data interpretation. AH and MF drafted the manuscript, and all the other authors were involved in the critical revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hattori, A., Seki, A., Inaba, N. et al. Expression levels and DNA methylation profiles of the growth gene SHOX in cartilage tissues and chondrocytes. Sci Rep 14, 8069 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58530-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58530-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.