Abstract
Aeromonas spp. are gram-negative facultatively anaerobic bacilli recovered mainly from aquatic environments. Aeromonas spp. were reported to be associated with infections primarily in aquatic and to a lesser extent in terrestrial animals as well as in humans. Up-to-date little is known about aeromonads associated with wild animals, especially with rodents. This study reported the first isolation and characterization of two Aeromonas spp. from internal organs of apparently healthy wild rodents Apodemus uralensis and Apodemus flavicollis captured in the wild environment in the European part of Russia. Isolates were identified as A. hydrophila M-30 and A. encheleia M-2 using the multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach. The isolation of the A. encheleia from rodents is the first described case. Both strains demonstrated beta-hemolytic activity towards human erythrocytes. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that both Aeromonas strains were resistant and intermediate to carbapenems and piperacillin-tazobactam, which was caused by the expression of the genus-specific CphA carbapenemases. A. hydrophila M-30 also demonstrated trimethoprim resistant phenotype. This is usually caused by the carriage of the dfrA or dfrB genes in aeromonads which are frequently associated with integron class I. The latter however was absent in both isolates. Our results expand our understanding of possible aeromonad reservoirs and demonstrate the likelihood of the formation of natural foci of Aeromonas infection and a new link in the chain of the spread of antimicrobial resistance as well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Aeromonads are ubiquitous Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic bacteria. The genus Aeromonas includes more than 35 species recovered mainly from aquatic environments and diverse animal species but also clinical settings, and human infection processes. Aeromonads were isolated from different kinds of water including surface, underground, seawater, wastewater, and even bottled water1,2,3,4,5. They are thought to be primarily autochthonous to aquatic environments and were also found in a variety of aquatic animals, such as mollusks6, sick salmonids7, catfish8, eels9,10,11, crocodiles12. However, they were also isolated from terrestrial animals, for instance, rectal swabs of cats, dogs13, and horses' feces14.
Aeromonads are known as fish pathogens, first of all, such species as A. salmonicida and A. hydrophila. The first of them—A. salmonicida, in particular, infects salmonids and causes ulcers, furunculosis, and hemorrhagic septicemia, bringing tremendous economic losses to continental and marine aquaculture15. Meanwhile, some hypervirulent lineages of A. hydrophila are responsible for large-scale persistent outbreaks globally characterized by massive hemorrhage and exophthalmia in warm-water fishes16. However, due to frequent misidentification, the certain incidence in fish between these two species is hard to evaluate.
Aeromonas species are also known to infect humans. Aeromonads are emerging pathogens that can cause acute gastroenteritis and wound infections and are occasionally involved in life-threatening septicemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent persons. The most prevalent species that are associated with clinical cases are A. caviae, A. veronii, A. dhakensis, and A. hydrophila17. The pathogenic potential of these species is different. Comparative analysis performed by P.-L. Chen et al. in 2013 was shown that A. dhakensis prevailed in wound infection exposed to environmental water and was more virulent than A. hydrophila, exhibiting increased biofilm formation ability and higher cytotoxicity to human fibroblast cells18. It was noted that the transmission of virulent Aeromonas strains occurs via the fecal–oral route through both indirect and direct contact with contaminated water19,20. Thus Aeromonas spp. constitute a heterogeneous group, some members of which are clinically important species occurring in humans.
Both clinical and environmental isolates belonging to this genus often possess antibiotics resistance determinants21,22,23. Antimicrobial resistance is one of the main points of the One Health holistic approach that implies the interconnection between the three linked key elements of biosphere well-being: humans, animals, and the environment24. The latter has drawn increasing attention because the natural environment can serve as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of both genes and bacteria itself25,26,27. This is notably true for aquatic environments which are primarily exposed to wastewater from hospitals, clinics, and industry28. Being the natural inhabitants of such an environment, aeromonads may acquire various resistant genes and disseminate the latter via horizontal gene transfer29.
Wild animals are also of high importance in the One Health concept30. They constitute a potential natural AMR and infection reservoir. They also actively participate in the dissemination of bacteria and resistance determinants across different habitats31,32. Apart from aquatic animals some Aeromonas spp. were isolated from feces of wild terrestrial animals: A. salmonicida from red deer (Cervus elaphus) and tawny owl (Strix aluco); A. bestiarum from red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris); A. eucrenophila from snake (Colubridae), and A. veronii from short-toed snake eagle (Circaetus gallicus)33. Interestingly, almost half of the above isolates were multidrug-resistant and possessed acquired beta-lactamase genes. Taking into account that Aeromonas, including their pathogenic strains, are ubiquitous and can transmit and circulate through the food chain from water to various terrestrial animals and humans it may serve as a vehicle for AMR spreading. In this regard, little is known about biological features, such as AMR profile and pathogenic potential of Aeromonas spp. isolated from animals inhabiting different wild environments.
In this study, we report two Aeromonas strains isolated from the internal organs of apparently healthy rodents captured in a wild environment. We performed genus identification via 16S rRNA gene sequencing and used the MLSA approach for identification at species level. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles as well as antimicrobial resistance genes detection and analysis were carried out. Additionally, we assessed virulent properties via in vitro hemolytic activity evaluation and detection of major virulence genes via PCR.
Results
Sample collection
In total, 37 captures of apparently healthy small mammals (36 belonged to the species of Rodentia order and 1 of Insectivora) were recorded during the month (June 2021). Among the 4 species of small mammals that were captured, the herb field mouse (Apodemus uralensis) represented 40.5% (n = 15), bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus)—27.0% (n = 10), yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis)—5.4% (n = 2) and common shrews (Sorex araneus)—2.7% (n = 1) of total captures. A total of 65 different Gram-negative isolates were received from internal organs of captured small mammals. Only two isolates of them (3.0%) were further identified as Aeromonas spp. via 16 s rRNA gene sequencing.
Isolation and identification of Aeromonas strains
The two strains of Aeromonas were isolated from the internal organs of captured apparently healthy wild rodents. Strain M-2 was isolated from the spleen of a female Herb field mouse (Apodemus uralensis) through the PSB Broth Base and further CIN agar cultivation. It produced small bull’s-eye mucoid colonies on CIN agar, resembling the growth of Yersinia spp.
The M-30 strain was isolated from the lungs of a male yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) via the BPW broth and further XLD agar cultivation. Microscopic investigations showed the typical Gram-negative bacilli morphology of both strains. Studied strains had catalase and oxidase-positive phenotypes.
We performed initial identification via 16 s rRNA gene sequencing using 27f. and 1492r universal primers. Assembled 16 s rRNA gene consensus was 1367 bp for M-2 isolate and 1412 bp for M-30. The highest value of sequence identity of M-2 consensus was 99.85% with the sequence of the A. aquatica AE235(T) and A. encheleia LMG 16,331(T), 99.36% of identity with the A. media CECT 4232(T) was detected for M-30 consensus. The maximum-likelihood tree, based on 16 s rRNA gene sequences (alignment length 1276 bp) of our two and 35 Aeromonas spp. strains showed that M-2 clustered together with A. aquatica AE235 (GCF 000,764,655.1) while M-30 was in the outgroup position regarding A. hydrophila-rivipollensis-media-clade (Fig. 1a).
Reconstructed cladograms of M-2, M-30 and 35 Aeromonas spp. strains based on: (a) 16 s rRNA gene sequence-based cladogram. (b) MLSA based cladogram (5 loci). Cladograms were visualized in Interactive Tree Of Life v5 (iTOL)34.
Aeromonas species identification by the Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) approach
It is well known that the Aeromonas genus has a complex taxonomy that cannot be resolved only by 16 s rRNA gene sequencing. Therefore, we performed multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) based on 5 loci (groL, gltA, metG, ppsA, and recA) from Martino et al. scheme to resolve the issue of the species of our studied strains. The maximum-likelihood cladogram reconstructed from the alignment of concatenated loci (total length 3084 bp) of our and 35 Aeromonas spp. strains showed that M-2 strain formed one monophyletic group with Aeromonas encheleia NCTC12917 (GCF 900,637,545.1) with a bootstrap of 100 whereas M-30 strain made one phylogenetic group with the A. hydrophila strains, where the closest one was NF2 (GCF 000,708,065.1) with 70 value bootstrap. Because MLSA has been offered as a gold standard taxonomic approach to Aeromonas species delineation our strains were identified as A. encheleia M-2 and A. hydrophila M-30 (Fig. 1b).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Aeromonas strains
We estimated the antimicrobial susceptibility of M-2 and M-30 strains to 15 commonly used antimicrobials via the disk-diffusion method following CLSI guidance. Susceptibility patterns as well as the diameter of inhibition zones are provided in Table 1.
A. encheleia M-2 was resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam only and had an intermediate level of resistance (I—susceptible with increased dosing) to both carbapenems tested (meropenem and imipenem). Whereas A. hydrophila M-30 was resistant to 4 antimicrobials including the 3 beta-lactams as well as 1 diaminopyrimidine: piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, and trimethoprim respectively. Both strains were susceptible to other tested beta-lactams: cephalosporins and monobactam; as well as aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
PCR analysis
The presence of cphA genes in M-2 and M-30 strains coding for the unique Aeromonas-specific beta-lactamase (Fig. 2a, original Fig. S1) was detected through PCR with specific primers, as indicated by a product size of 346 bp.
Using primers for the integrase (intI1) gene amplicons with a size of 920 bp were also detected (Fig. 2b, original Fig. S2). Obtained amplicons were sequenced and searched against GeneBank through blastx. intI1 M-2 amplicon was matched as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, intI1 M-30 was matched as cytochrome b-b6 domain-containing protein. Putative variable regions were also amplificated: for M-2 strain 1000 bp and 900 bp for M-30. Both amplicons were sequenced: the amplicon of M-2 strain matched as 50S ribosomal protein, and the amplicon of M-30 strain matched as DUF3450 domain-containing protein in blastx search.
The presence of hlyA genes was detected in M-30 strain which correlates with their hemolytic activity on 5% blood agar. Other major virulence genes alt and ast were also detected in M-30 A. hydrophila via PCR. Meanwhile, M-2 isolate has no detected virulence factors through PCR (Fig. 2c, original Fig. S3).
Hemolysis assay
Hemolysis investigation of both strains was performed at 3 different temperature points: 25 °C, 35 °C, and 37 °C for 24 h and 48 h (Fig. 3). A. encheleia M-2 strain showed gamma-hemolysis in all tested temperature conditions after 24 h. However, the beta-hemolysis was observed after 48 h of cultivation at all temperatures, but most clearly at 35 °C. A. hydrophila M-30 demonstrated beta-hemolysis after 24 h. Clear transparent zones of 2–4 mm in size were observed around the M-30 colonies when cultivated at all temperature points.
Virulence factors production
The culture-based method was utilized to detect the production of the following virulence factors: gelatinase (proteases), lecithinase, lipase, and flagellum.
The gelatinase test was positive for A. hydrophila M-30 (liquid fraction formation was detected) and negative for A. encheleia M-2 (Fig. S4).
Lecithinase activity (formation of precipitation on egg yolk agar) was detected after 48 h of incubation in M-2 strain only (Fig. S5), however on the third day weak precipitate formation was also detected around the M-30 colonies. Lipase activity was negative (iridescent sheen was not detected) in both strains. Protease activity (clear zone formation) was positive in both strains, although visually M-30 had a larger clear zone than M-2 (Fig. S5).
Motility was detected in M-30 only (diffuse growth was observed), while M-2 grew strictly along the inoculation trail (Fig. S6).
Discussion
Aeromonads are ubiquitous Gram-negative bacteria. They are thought to be primarily autochthonous to aquatic environments. In this study, two strains of A. encheleia M-2 and A. hydrophila M-30 that were isolated from the internal organs of apparently healthy wild rodents have been identified. We characterized the antimicrobial resistance profile and hemolytic activity as well as analyzed the resistance determinants and the main virulence genes of both strains via PCR approach and with a culture-based method.
Previous studies have reported the isolation of A. encheleia strains to occur on the surface as well as in underground water1, in European eels10,35, and in drinking water supply35,36. To the best of our knowledge, the first case of A. encheleia isolation from wild rodents is reported here. However, the significance of the detection of A. encheleia in the lungs is questionable due to potential aspiration during agony. It is believed that A. encheleia are not pathogenic for eels or mice10. We were unable to find data on the pathogenicity of A. encheleia for humans as well. However, several Aeromonas species were found as pathogens in a variety of cold-blooded and warm-blooded animals, including humans37,38. Aeromonads can cause serious diseases in humans: acute gastroenteritis, wound infections, and septicemias in immunosuppressed patients39.
A. hydrophila is predominantly pathogenic to poikilothermy animals, including fish, turtles, snakes, and amphibians37. However, A. hydrophila can infect humans as well, moreover, Risco et al. reported the isolation of A. hydrophila in the respiratory tract of wild boar piglet in Spain with severe purulent pneumonia which defines this bacterium as a zoonotic pathogen that may pose a potential risk to people40. Interestingly, we discovered a hemolytic activity possessed by A. hydrophila M-30 and A. encheleia M-2 to human erythrocytes. Moreover, we detected three major virulence genes in A. hydrophila M-30, including hemolysin (hlyA), cytotonic heat-labile (alt), and heat-stable (ast) enterotoxins via PCR. Previous investigations reported that all clinical isolates of Aeromonas spp. harbor hlyA or aerA genes, which encode hemolysin (HlyA) and aerolysin (AerA), respectively. It indicates hemolysins are essential virulence factors participating in the pathogenesis of infections caused by Aeromonas41. Singh et al. revealed the correlation between beta-hemolytic activity and enterotoxic effect in the rabbit ileal loop infection model independently of aeromonads species designation42. Aeromonas hemolysins were shown to not only damage the intestinal epithelium but also stimulate chlorine secretion, which indicates that they are the key diarrheal etiological factors43. Aeromonas spp. may also carry cytotonic heat-labile (alt) and heat-stable (ast) enterotoxins that are considered to be the major virulence determinants associated with gastroenteritis, especially with diarrhea44. The activity of other virulence factors such as gelatinase, lecithinase, lipase, and motility was tested via a culture-based method. Interestingly, only the A. hydrophyla M-30 strain was positive for gelatinase and motility at 37 °C and negative for lecithinase. However, a weak precipitation zone was observed on the third day of incubation. It indicates a weak activity of lecithinase. M-2 strain exhibited gelatinase-negative, nonmotile, but lecithinase-positive phenotype after 48 h of incubation. Lipase activity was negative on egg yolk agar, but for lipase activity detection more accurate approaches, such as the colorimetric method is recommended45. Proteolytic activity was additionally detected in both strains. Mentioned above findings indicate that both our Aeromonas strains have potential virulent properties. This is particularly true for A. hydrophila M-30 which possessed all three major virulence genes associated with enterotoxicity and exhibited activity of some secreted virulence factors.
Aeromonads are well known to be intrinsically resistant to some beta-lactams due to harboring a wide range of chromosomally mediated beta-lactamases of different classes46. From a clinical point of view, the most interesting among them is the unique Ambler class B CphA beta-lactamase which is specific only to carbapenems47. Several reports showed that the disk-diffusion method failed to detect carbapenem resistance mediated by CphA since a high likelihood of false-negative results48,49. Surprisingly, in our study phenotypic resistance to meropenem and imipenem was observed in A. hydrophila M-30 strain while A. encheleia M-2 had an intermediate category (I) of carbapenem resistance. However, we detected cphA gene in both Aeromonas strains through PCR with specific primers. These findings confirm the phenotypic resistance profile of these strains to carbapenems. Additionally, we discovered piperacillin-tazobactam resistance in both strains. This phenomenon may be explained by the possible expression of chromosomally encoded ampC beta-lactamase gene by Aeromonas strains which confer resistance to a wide range of beta-lactams as well as beta-lactamase inhibitors, including tazobactam.
Notably, strain M-30 showed trimethoprim resistant phenotype. Kadlec et al. showed that trimethoprim resistance in Aeromonas can be caused by different alleles of dfrA or dfrB genes, which are frequently associated with class 1 integrons (InC1)50. The latter is known to be the most widespread integron class associated with antimicrobial resistance. These mobile genetic elements (MGE) can be embedded in various mobile or conjugative MGE such as plasmids or conjugative transposons which in turn permit its lateral transfer to related or even distantly related bacterial species, which further leads to antimicrobial resistance dissemination51. Piotrowska and Popowska showed that genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides (aadA1, aadA2) and trimethoprim (dfrA1) are the most often found gene cassettes in Aeromonas InC1 integrons52. However, integrase gene class I (IntI1) as well as typical gene cassettes were not detected in both Aeromonas stains, which indicates the absence of integron class I in their genomes. Resistance to trimethoprim in M-30 isolate may be caused by a modified dfr allele unrelated to integron class I, although it may be related to other integron classes or mobile elements.
Thus, the detection of A. encheleia and A. hydrophila in wild rodents potentially supposes a ubiquitous distribution of these bacteria including terrestrial animal organisms. Strains isolated from wild animals demonstrate a resistant phenotype to some beta-lactams as well as trimethoprim. The data we received expanded our understanding of the ecology of these microorganisms and highlight the need for surveillance of these bacteria in wildlife as the major elements in antimicrobial-resistant dissemination in natural ecosystems.
Despite our findings, we recognize the limitations of our work. Animal captures were restricted to a single period; the total number of animal captures was low as well as the total number of isolated Aeromonas strains. We did not conduct any pathological-anatomical investigations and measurements of bacterial load in organs. The exact nature of these strains, whether they were transient or rather resident (harbored in the rodent for a long time), remains vague. More extensive and large-scale research is required to find out whether rodents or other small terrestrial mammals can be a reservoir for bacteria of these species.
Materials and methods
Ethics Statement
Animal experiments were performed according to: (I) The Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes; (II) The Russian Federation Federal Law No. 498-ФЗ “On Responsible Handling of Animals and on Amending Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”, adopted on 17 December 2018; (III) ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines53. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Fieldwork was carried out on the task of the government assignment by Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology. Wild mice were used in this study. None of the rodent species investigated in the present study had protected status. Trapping campaigns were systematically performed with prior explicit agreement from relevant local authorities, and from the owners of the territory where trapping was performed. All procedures involving animals (trapping and killing) were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (certificate №: IRECAS_03).
Samples collection and rodent species
Wild rodents were captured in June 2021 in the Lyskovsky District of the Nizhny Novgorod region, Russia. Animals were captured in the forests on the right bank of the Volga River (56.070217; 45.332745). The soils in this area are loamy and gray forest. The forests are predominantly mixed and varied in the composition of species: oak, birch, linden, maple, hazel, euonymus, mountain ash, as well as various herbs.
Animal carcasses were treated with insecticides and placed in separate containers. Transportation, autopsy, and collection of organs and tissues were carried out on the same day. Identification of species of wild rodents was performed using a guide-identifier of animal species.
Bacterial strains isolation
The Aeromonas strains were isolated from apparently healthy rodents in the framework of a complex study dealing with microbial biodiversity in the natural foci of infections. The captured small rodents were autopsied in aseptic conditions. All procedures were carried out in the biosafety cabinet to get the proper sterility condition and to avoid contamination54. The animal's pelt was pretreated with 70% isopropyl alcohol to reduce the microbial load on the surface and reduce the likelihood of contamination. The following organs were aseptically extracted in the corresponding order: lungs, liver, spleen, mesentery, and intestines. The intestines were extracted last to prevent contamination of other internal organs with gut microbiota. Each organ was dipped in 96% ethanol and flamed rapidly through an open flame. The inner part of the organs was obtained via cutting with sterile micro scissors (the intestines were just cut). Extracted inner part of organs was transferred in 10 ml of PSB Broth Base (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and BPW (Himedia, Mumbai, India) to enrichment for 120 h at 22 °C and 24 h at 37 °C respectively. After the enrichment stage, a loopful of each broth PSB and BPW was streaked onto CIN agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and XLD agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) respectively following the incubation for 24 h at 25 °C and 37 °C. Morphologically distinct colonies were plated onto Nutrient agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) for further cultivation and getting an axenic culture. Received isolates were tested on oxidase activity with OXItest (Erba Lachema) and catalase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide. All isolates were stored at -80 °C in Nutrient Broth (Himedia, Mumbai, India) containing 15% glycerol.
16 s rRNA gene-based strain identification
The 16 s rRNA gene sequencing was performed to identify M-2 and M-30 strains. Bacterial DNA was isolated from overnight grown pure cultures (single colonies were used) through thermal lysis of bacterial suspensions at 95 °C for 15 min. We utilized the following universal primers: 27F: 5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’ and 1492R: 5’-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′ 55. The amplicons of ~ 1500 bp in length were removed from 1% agarose gel and extracted via an agarose gel DNA extraction kit (Dia-m, Moscow, Russia). Sanger sequencing was performed at the GENOME Center for Collective Use (Moscow, Russia). The consensus of the 16 s rRNA gene was assembled in UGENE (v39.0) software manually56. The EzTaxon server was used as a 16 s rRNA reference gene database for identification57. Maximum-likelihood phylogeny was reconstructed in MEGA7 software together with 16 s rRNA gene sequences of reference strains from GenBank with 1000 bootstrap replications58. The accession numbers of strains used are listed in Table 2.
Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)-based strains identification
Because 16 s rRNA gene-based identification of Aeromonas species has not enough discriminatory power we used multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), also known as multilocus phylogenetic analysis (MLPA) as a more sophisticated method appropriate to resolve the complex taxonomy of Aeromonads. Loci from the Aeromonas MLST scheme suggested by Martino et al. were used59. A set of 5 loci including groL, gltA, metG, ppsA, and recA was chosen. Primers as well as cycling conditions suggested by the original scheme mentioned above were used. The final volume of PCR mixture was 25 µl with 1 µl of template DNA, 1 µl of each 10 µM primer, 2,5 µl 10X of Encyclo buffer (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), 0,5 µl 10 µM of dNTP, 0,5 µl of Encyclo polymerase (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), and 18,5 µl of deionized nuclease-free water. The amplification conditions were as follows: an initial step at 94 °C for 2 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 10 s, annealing at different temperatures (groL 56 °C, gltA 58 °C, metG 57 °C, ppsA 60 °C, and recA 57 °C) for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. Amplicons were detected in 1% agarose gel through horizontal electrophoresis. The target amplicons were extracted from the gel and purified with the GeneJET Gel Extraction kit (Dia-m, Moscow, Russia). Sanger sequencing was performed at the GENOME Center for Collective Use (Moscow, Russia), which is equipped with an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer. Obtained DNA sequences from 5 loci were concatenated and utilized for further phylogenetic analysis. GenBank was used to receive loci from genomes of other relative species of the Aeromonas genus for phylogeny reconstruction (Table 1). Maximum-likelihood phylogeny was reconstructed in MEGA7 software with 1000 bootstrap replications58.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Susceptibility to the antimicrobial agents was tested by the disk-diffusion method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidance on Mueller–Hinton agar (Himedia, India, Mumbai). In total antimicrobial susceptibility testing to 13 commonly used antimicrobials was performed. The following antibiotics were used: piperacillin-tazobactam (30–6 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ceftazidime (10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), amikacin (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg),ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), enrofloxacin (5 µg), trimetoprim-sulfametoxazol (1.25–23.75 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), trimethoprim (5 µg). The Escherichia coli strain ATCC 25,922 was utilized as a control.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays
Aeromonas strains were cultured in Tryptone Soya Broth (Himedia) at 37 °C for 18–20 h. Cells were harvested and total DNA was extracted through thermal lysis of bacterial cells suspension at 95 °C for 15 min. DNA of each strain was utilized as a template to detect antimicrobial resistance determinants, including cphA class B beta-lactamase gene60, class I integrase gene (intI1)61, and variable integron region (gene cassettes)62. Additionally, the main aeromonads virulence genes (genes associated with enterotoxigenicity) were screened, including the hemolysin hlyA gene63, cytotonic heat-labile, and heat-stable enterotoxin genes (alt and ast respectively)64.
The PCR cycling conditions used were as the following: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, then 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing depending on primers used, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The primers utilized for amplification, the expected sizes of the amplification products as well as annealing temperature are listed in Table 3. Amplicons were visualized via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Sanger sequencing of intI1 gene and in (variable regions) locus was performed at the GENOME Center for Collective Use (Moscow, Russia).
Hemolysis assay
Columbia Agar Base (Himedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with 5% (v-v) of mechanically defibrinated human O-group blood was utilized to check bacterial hemolytic activity (a blood sample was aseptically collected from a healthy adult volunteer with his documentary consent). Both overnight Aeromonas cultures were plated onto blood agar with further incubation for 24 h and 48 h at 3 different temperature points: 25 °C, 35 °C, and 37 °C. Clear transparent zones around the grown colonies were interpreted as beta-hemolysis, color change (to greenish or yellow-greenish) was interpreted as alpha-hemolysis, and the absence of any visible changes was interpreted as gamma-hemolysis.
Phenotypic assessment of some virulence factors production
The culture-based method was implemented to evaluate the secretion of virulence factors. The following tests were carried out: gelatin hydrolysis, lecithinase, lipase activity test, and motility test. Mentioned above-secreted virulence factors are known to be involved in invasion by direct damage of host tissue, inactivation of the complement system, cytotoxicity, etc65.
Bacterial strains were grown previously at 37 °C for 24 h in Tryptone Soya Broth (Himedia). The Gelatin hydrolysis test was performed with a Micro-Gelatinase-NICF kit (RCP, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) following manufacturer instructions. Briefly, the gelatin deep tubes were inoculated with 24 h bacterial cultures. Test tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h. As a negative control, noninoculated gelatin deep tubes were used. After incubation tubes were cooled at 4–5 °C for 30 min. Visible hydrolysis (liquid fraction formation) was considered a positive result. For lecithinase and lipase activity detection egg yolk agar base (Himedia) with 2.5% yolk was utilized, and incubation was carried out for 18–48 h and continued for 7 days (lipase activity may be delayed). The positive reaction was considered if an opaque (visible precipitation) was formed around the bacterial colonies for lecithinase activity; a clear zone formation for protease activity, and forming an iridescent sheen on the surface of the colonies for lipase activity. The motility test was performed via inoculation of the Motility Test Medium (Himedia) and following incubation at 37 °C. Motility was considered positive if the diffuse zone was formed of growth flaring out from the inoculation line.
Data availability
The data sets generated during the current study are available in the GenBank repository: partial 16 s rRNA gene sequence of Aeromonas encheleia M-2 (accession no. OP847777) and Aeromonas hydrophila (accession no. OP847778).
References
Nováková, D., Švec, P. & Sedláček, I. Characterization of Aeromonas encheleia strains isolated from aquatic environments in the Czech Republic. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 48, 289–294 (2009).
Miyagi, K., Hirai, I. & Sano, K. Distribution of Aeromonas species in environmental water used in daily life in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 21, 287–294 (2016).
Martone-Rocha, S. et al. Dynamics of Aeromonas species isolated from wastewater treatment system. J. Water Health 8, 703–711 (2010).
Chen, J. S. et al. Prevalence, virulence-gene profiles, antimicrobial resistance, and genetic diversity of human pathogenic Aeromonas spp. from shellfish and aquatic environments. Environ. Pollut. 287, 79 (2021).
De Oliveira, S. D. et al. The occurrence of Aeromonas spp. in the bottled mineral water, well water and tap water from the municipal supplies. Brazilian Arch. Biol. Technol. 51, 1049–1055 (2008).
Miñana-Galbis, D., Farfán, M., Fusté, M. C. & Lorén, J. G. Aeromonas molluscorum sp. nov., isolated from bivalve molluscs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 2073–2078 (2004).
Beaz-Hidalgo, R., Alperi, A., Figueras, M. J. & Romalde, J. L. Aeromonas piscicola sp. nov., isolated from diseased fish. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 32, 471–479 (2009).
Nawaz, M. et al. Detection and characterization of virulence genes and integrons in Aeromonas veronii isolated from catfish. Food Microbiol. 27, 327–331 (2010).
Martinez-Murcia, A. J., Esteve, C., Garay, E. & Collins, M. D. Aeromonas allosaccharophila sp. nov., a new mesophilic member of the genus Aeromonas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 91, 199–205 (1992).
Esteve, C., Gutierrez, M. C. & Ventosa, A. Aeromonas encheleia sp. nov., isolated from European Eels. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45, 462–466 (1995).
Esteve, C., Alcaide, E. & Blasco, M. D. Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. dhakensis isolated from feces, water and fish in Mediterranean Spain. Microbes Environ. 27, 367–373 (2012).
Roh, Y. S. et al. Aeromonas hydrophila-associated septicemia in captive crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni and Crocodylus porosus). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 42, 738–742 (2011).
Ghenghesh, K. S., Abeid, S. S., Jaber, M. M. & Ben-Taher, S. A. Isolation and haemolytic activity of Aeromonas species from domestic dogs and cats. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22, 175–179 (1999).
Hathcock, T. L., Schumacher, J., Wright, J. C. & Stringfellow, J. The prevalence of Aeromonas Species in Feces of Horses with Diarrhea. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 13, 357–360 (1999).
Goldschmidt-Clermont, E., Hochwartner, O., Demarta, A., Caminada, A. P. & Frey, J. Outbreaks of an ulcerative and haemorrhagic disease in Arctic char Salvelinus alpinus caused by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. smithia. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 86, 81–86 (2009).
Rasmussen-Ivey, C. R. et al. Classification of a hypervirulent aeromonas hydrophila pathotype responsible for epidemic outbreaks in warm-water fishes. Front. Microbiol. 7, 79 (2016).
Joerg, G. Aeromonas. (Caister Academic Press, 2015). https://doi.org/10.21775/9781908230560.
Chen, P. L. et al. A comparative study of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis and Aeromonas hydrophila isolates in southern Taiwan: A. dhakensis is more predominant and virulent. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, 15 (2014).
Liu, F. et al. Analysis of global Aeromonas veronii genomes provides novel information on source of infection and virulence in human gastrointestinal diseases. BMC Genom. 23, 96 (2022).
Li, F. et al. Distribution, virulence-associated genes and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas isolates from diarrheal patients and water, China. J. Infect. 70, 600–608 (2015).
Palú, A. P. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in food and clinical Aeromonas isolates. Food Microbiol. 23, 504–509 (2006).
Bottoni, C. et al. Identification of new natural CphA metallo-β-lactamases CphA4 and CphA5 in Aeromonas veronii and Aeromonas hydrophila Isolates from municipal sewage in central Italy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 4990–4993 (2015).
Igbinosa, I. H. & Okoh, A. I. Antibiotic susceptibility profile of aeromonas species isolated from wastewater treatment plant. Sci. World J. 2012, 81 (2012).
Kahn, L. H. Perspective: The one-health way. Nat. 2017 5437647 543, S47–S47 (2017).
Wright, G. D. Antibiotic resistance in the environment: A link to the clinic?. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13, 589–594 (2010).
Baros Jorquera, C. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife and in the built environment in a wildlife rehabilitation center. One Heal. 13, 94 (2021).
Vittecoq, M. et al. REVIEW: Antimicrobial resistance in wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 519–529 (2016).
Baquero, F., Martínez, J. L. & Cantón, R. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 260–265 (2008).
Gomes, S. et al. The role of aquatic ecosystems (River Tua, Portugal) as reservoirs of multidrug-resistant Aeromonas spp. Water (Switzerland) 13, 41 (2021).
Mackenzie, J. S. & Jeggo, M. The one health approach—why is it so important? Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, Vol. 4, Page 88 4, 88 (2019).
Zhong, C. et al. Comprehensive analysis reveals the evolution and pathogenicity of aeromonas, viewed from both single isolated species and microbial communities. mSystems 4, 71 (2019).
Grilo, M. L., Sousa-Santos, C., Robalo, J. & Oliveira, M. The potential of Aeromonas spp. from wildlife as antimicrobial resistance indicators in aquatic environments. Ecol. Indic. 115, 81 (2020).
Dias, C. et al. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and carbapenemaseproducing Aeromonas species in wild animals from Portugal. Vet. Rec. 174, 532 (2014).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Huys, G. et al. Inclusion of Aeromonas DNA hybridization group 11 in Aeromonas encheleia and extended descriptions of the species Aeromonas eucrenophila and A. encheleia. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47, 1157–1164 (1997).
Valera, L. & Esteve, C. Phenotypic study by numerical taxonomy of strains belonging to the genus Aeromonas. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 77–95 (2002).
Janda, J. M. & Abbott, S. L. The genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 35–73 (2010).
Kim, K. T., Lee, S. H., Lee, K. K., Han, J. E. & Kwak, D. Enhanced virulence of aeromonas hydrophila is induced by stress and serial passaging in mice. Animals 11, 1–11 (2021).
Borchardt, M. A., Stemper, M. E. & Standridge, J. H. Aeromonas isolates from human diarrheic stool and groundwater compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9, 224–228 (2003).
Risco, D. et al. Isolation of aeromonas Hydrophila in the respiratory tract of wild boar: Pathologic implications. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 44, 1090–1093 (2013).
Dong, J., Ruan, J., Xu, N., Yang, Y. & Ai, X. Expression, purification, and characterization of hemolytic toxin from virulent Aeromonas hydrophila. J. World Aquac. Soc. 48, 531–536 (2017).
Singh, D. V. & Sanyal, S. C. Production of haemolysis and its correlation with enterotoxicity in Aeromonas spp.. J. Med. Microbiol. 37, 262–267 (1992).
Epple, H. J. et al. Aeromonas hydrophila beta-hemolysin induces active chloride secretion in colon epithelial cells (HT-29/B6). Infect. Immun. 72, 4848–4858 (2004).
Chopra, A. K. & Houston, C. W. Enterotoxins in Aeromonas-associated gastroenteritis. Microbes Infect. 1, 1129–1137 (1999).
Yao, W. et al. A valuable product of microbial cell factories: microbial lipase. Front. Microbiol. 12, 2724 (2021).
Chen, P. L., Ko, W. C. & Wu, C. J. Complexity of β-lactamases among clinical Aeromonas isolates and its clinical implications. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 45, 398–403 (2012).
Massidda, O., Rossolini, G. M. & Satta, G. The Aeromonas hydrophila cphA gene: Molecular heterogeneity among class B metallo-β-lactamases. J. Bacteriol. 173, 4611–4617 (1991).
Sinclair, H. A. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic identification of Aeromonas species and CphA-mediated carbapenem resistance in Queensland, Australia. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 85, 98–101 (2016).
Wang, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, L. & Sun, B. Application of modified carbapenem inactivation method and its derivative tests for the detection of carbapenemase-producing aeromonas. Infect. Drug Resist. 14, 3949–3960 (2021).
Kadlec, K. et al. Molecular basis of sulfonamide and trimethoprim resistance in fish-pathogenic Aeromonas isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 7147–7150 (2011).
Gillings, M. et al. The evolution of class 1 integrons and the rise of antibiotic resistance. J. Bacteriol. 190, 5095–5100 (2008).
Piotrowska, M. & Popowska, M. Insight into the mobilome of Aeromonas strains. Front. Microbiol. 6, 79 (2015).
du Sert, N. P. et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000411 (2020).
Scudamore, C. L., Busk, N. & Vowell, K. A simplified necropsy technique for mice: Making the most of unscheduled deaths. Lab. Anim. 48, 342–344 (2014).
Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A. & Lane, D. J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173, 697–703 (1991).
Okonechnikov, K. et al. Unipro UGENE: A unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 28, 1166–1167 (2012).
Yoon, S. H. et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67, 1613–1617 (2017).
Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).
Martino, M. E. et al. Determination of microbial diversity of Aeromonas strains on the basis of multilocus sequence typing, phenotype, and presence of putative virulence genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4986–5000 (2011).
Mlynarcik, P., Dolejska, M., Vagnerova, I., Kutilová, I. & Kolar, M. Detection of clinically important β-lactamases by using PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 368, 68 (2021).
Pazhani, G. P. et al. QRDR mutations, efflux system & antimicrobial resistance genes in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from an outbreak of diarrhoea in Ahmedabad, India. Indian J. Med. Res. 134, 214 (2011).
Zhang, H. et al. Identification and characterization of class 1 integron resistance gene cassettes among Salmonella strains isolated from healthy humans in China. Microbiol. Immunol. 48, 639–645 (2004).
Abdullah, A. I., Hart, C. A. & Winstanley, C. Molecular characterization and distribution of virulence-associated genes amongst Aeromonas isolates from Libya. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95, 1001–1007 (2003).
Sen, K. & Rodgers, M. Distribution of six virulence factors in Aeromonas species isolated from US drinking water utilities: A PCR identification. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97, 1077–1086 (2004).
Tomás, J. M. The main Aeromonas pathogenic factors. ISRN Microbiol. 2012, 1–22 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: P.A.A., A.A.B., and S.A.E.; Methodology: P.A.A., A.A.B, and P.A.Z.; Validation: D.D.K., E.A.L, P.A.Z., A.I.T.; Formal analysis: P.A.A. and D.D.K.; Investigation: D.D.K., P.A.A., P.A.Z., E.A.L., A.I.T.; Resources: A.A.B.; Writing-original draft preparation: P.A.A. and A.A.B.; Writing-review and editing P.A.A., S.A.E., O.I.Z. and A.A.B; Visualization: P.A.A.; Supervision P.A.A. and A.A.B; Project administration: P.A.A.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Andriyanov, P.A., Kashina, D.D., Liskova, E.A. et al. The first detection of two Aeromonas strains in mice of the genus Apodemus. Sci Rep 13, 4315 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31306-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31306-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.