Abstract
Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels is an important Chinese medicinal plant. A. sinensis seedlings are grown on an undisturbed alpine meadow soil to ensure the high-quality seedlings, but these soils are disappearing year after year. Thus, selecting a suitable bed soil for A. sinensis seedlings could ensure their long-term sustainability. Using HiSeq sequencing of 16S and 18S marker genes, we investigated the rhizosphere bacterial and fungal microbiotas of the seedlings grown in wheat, astragalus, potato, and angelica-cultivated soils at a geo-authentic habitat. Co-occurrence network analysis, canonical correspondence analysis, Mantel test, and Envfit test were used to examine the relationship between the microbiotas and the surrounding factors. Astragalus-cultivated soils exhibited the following properties: the highest plant weight, the highest neighborhood connectivity in the bacterial network, the highest ratio of positive/negative relationship in both bacterial and fungal networks, the highest relative abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the ectomycorrhizal fungi, the lowest relative abundance of Rhizoctonia solani, the suitable soil pH, and the close relationship between the rhizosphere microbiotas and the ecological factors. Moreover, each growth stage has its own major drivers in all crop-cultivated soils. Climate temperature and soil pH at 56 days after planting, precipitation at 98 days, and plant weight as well as microbial biomass C and N at 129 days were the major drivers of the bacterial and fungal microbiotas. Overall, the astragalus-cultivated soil was a suitable bed soil for nurturing A. sinensis seedlings to replace the undisturbed alpine meadow soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels (Umbelliferae) is a fragrant and herbaceous perennial plant and is widely used as a natural medicine in China. Usually, A. sinensis has a three-year growth cycle in a geo-authentic habitat (Dingxi, Gansu province), with the seedlings nurtured in the first year. To ensure high-quality seedlings, A. sinensis seedlings are traditionally cultivated in an undisturbed alpine meadow soil with rainfed agroecosystems1. Traditional farming methods are no longer sustainable when the number of undisturbed meadow soils decreases. Therefore, it is critical to find a cultivated soil to replace the undisturbed meadow soil.
The importance of soil selection in agricultural production has been extensively researched2. Researchers have identified the most suitable soils for a variety of crops in various areas. For example, American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) was shown to be appropriate for cultivation in a maize soil of three-year continuous cropping3. Wang et al.4, Jin et al.5, and Bai et al.6,7 investigated the impacts of the cultivated farmland from a geo-authentic habitat on A. sinensis seedling growth.
Moreover, many studies have shown that soil properties can influence the microbial community in the soil8. Tkacz et al.9 used model plants and crop plants to show that rhizosphere microbiota was influenced by the interaction of rhizosphere type and soil composition. Rhizosphere microbiota as a subgroup of soil microorganisms is considered to be the second genome of a plant, and they are closely linked to plant growth10. An et al1 reported the characteristics of the rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities of A. sinensis seedlings cultivated in an undisturbed alpine meadow soil from a geo-authentic habitat. Rhizosphere microbiota assembly is influenced by plant development11, soil pH12,13, and climate change14. Several previous studies have shown that different crops grown in the same soils can result in distinct responses of the soil bacterial and fungal microbiotas3,15. Rhizosphere microbiota are functionally diverse. Some microbes create beneficial effects on plants, such as phosphate-solubilizing and potassium-releasing16, protecting plants against pathogen infection17, N and S cycling18,19, and indole acetic acid production20, while others create harmful effects, such as plant pathogens21.
The rhizosphere microbiome of A. sinensis seedlings grown in cultivated soils from a geo-authentic habitat is currently unknown. However, building such knowledge will assist the sustainable production of this important medicinal plant. Therefore, a field experiment on the rhizosphere of A. sinensis seedlings was conducted in a geo-authentic habitat (Dingxi city). This study explored the bacterial and fungal microbiotas in the rhizosphere and the surrounding ecological factors, with the goal to find a suitable crop-cultivated soil for nurturing A. sinensis seedlings.
Materials and methods
Terminology and statement
The plots on which four crops had been cultivated and completed a life cycle were defined as “crop-cultivated soils”, including wheat-cultivated soils, astragalus-cultivated soils, potato-cultivated soils, and angelica-cultivated soils. All materials and methods were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations in China.
Study site and experimental design
The study site was located in Min County, Dingxi City, Gansu Province, China (N 34°25′27′′, E 104°28′24′′) and was 2783 m above sea level. The site is mountainous with a rainfed agroecosystem, a cool and semi-humid climate, 5–6 °C of annual average temperature, 2,219 h of yearly sunlight, 90–120 frost-free days per year, and 451.4–817.8 mm of annual precipitation.
In the first year, broad bean (Vicia faba L.) was planted in the test plot (Fig. 1). In the second year, four crops, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), astragalus [Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge. var. mongholicus (Bge.) Hsiao], potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), and angelica [Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels], were respectively cultivated in a six square metre plot under a single-factor randomized block design with three replications (Fig. 1). We maintained consistent plot management after cultivating four crops, and the crops were harvested on time. In the third year, the tests of nurturing A. sinensis seedlings were carried out on four crop-cultivated soils (four treatments) (Fig. 1). Before sowing A. sinensis seeds, we applied 1.5 kg of organic fertilizers to each plot. Each plot was seeded with 10 g of seeds (thousand-seed weight of 1.63 g, seed purity of 97.7%). Each plot was covered with a 0.5 cm layer of soils. During the seedling nurturing stage, each plot was managed consistently.
Sample preparation
In the third year, rhizosphere samples were collected from June to October during the plant growth stages of 56 days (AM), 98 days (BM), and 129 days (CM) after planting. In each plot, plant samples were comprised of five healthy plants that were randomly selected. After shaking off the loosely root-attached soils, we collected the tightly adhered rhizosphere using a sterile brush. Rhizosphere samples from the same growth stage were mixed and stored at − 80 °C. Further, the shaken off soil from the same growth stage was mixed, and the root residues were removed. After the rhizosphere samples were collected, the soil samples were used to determine the microbial biomass and the soil pH. The plants were used to determine the seedling weight.
Ecological factors
In this study, the plant weight (PW), the soil pH (pH), the microbial biomass C (MBC), the microbial biomass N (MBN), the climate temperature (T) and the precipitation (PC) were considered ecological factors affecting the rhizosphere microbiota. The plant weight was determined by weighing a seedling without the root soils. The soil pH was measured by a glass electrode in a water-to-soil ratio of 3:1 (v/w). The microbial biomass C and N were determined by the chloroform fumigation-extraction method22,23 and were estimated on the oven dry soil. The test process was as follows. The soil samples were sieved (2 mm), adjusted to 40% of the water holding capacity, and incubated at 25 °C for seven days. Incubated soils that were equivalent to 10 g of the oven dry soil were transferred into a 50 mL tube and fumigated for 24 h in the dark with alcohol free CHCl3 (non-fumigated soils as a control group). Fumigated and non-fumigated soils were mixed with 40 mL of 0.5 M K2SO4, shaken for 30 min, and filtered with qualitative filter paper under vacuum conditions. An automated carbon and nitrogen analyzer (Multi N/C 2100s, Jena, Germany) was used to estimate the microbial biomass C and N, and the value was calculated with conversion factors of 2.20 for the microbial biomass C and 1.85 for the microbial biomass N. The information of the climate temperature and precipitation were collected from the Weather Station.
DNA extraction, Illumina sequencing and function prediction
Total genome DNA was extracted by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method24. The region gene was amplified with the primer pair 515F/806R for 16S rRNA V4 and the primer pair 528F/706R for 18S rRNA V4. PCR amplification was referenced to the method described by An et al.1. The amplicons from each sample were mixed in equimolar amounts and then sequenced using IlluminaHiSeq (PE250, USA). Raw reads were treated by cutting off the barcodes and primer sequences, merging reads using FLASH25, filtering using QIIME26, and removing chimeras27,28 to obtain effective tags. Effective tags were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UPARSE (V 7.0.1001) with ≥ 97% sequence identity29. The rarefaction curves were calculated using the vegan package in R (V 3.5.0). Representative sequences in each OTU were selected, and blasted against the SILVA database (V 123) to annotate the taxonomic information for bacteria and fungi30,31. The multiple sequence alignment was conducted using MUSCLE (V 3.8.31)32. The functional prediction of microbiota was based on FAPROTAX database for bacteria33 and FUNGUILD database for fungi34. The sequences with a number of not less than one across all samples were selected and normalized to the maximum sequence count by calculating OTU relative abundances, yielding 35,042 bacterial sequences and 11,374 fungal sequences per sample.
Co-occurrence network
Before the co-occurrence network was built, the relative abundance of OTUs performed centered log-ratio (CLR) transformation. Each feature in a sample is divided by the geometric mean of all features in this sample, and then the natural logarithm of this ratio is taken35. The CLR transformation can be obtained as follows:
where j is each sample, Xj is the list of features in a sample, g(Xj) is the geometric mean of the features in sample Xj, X1j is the first feature in a sample, and XDj is the last feature in a sample of D values.
Co-occurrence networks were constructed based on Pearson correlation coefficients between the CLR transformed values of OTUs and the ecological factors (PW, pH, MBC, MBN, T, and PC), with a correlation coefficient − 0.60 ≥ r ≥ 0.60 and P < 0.05 (two-tailed). Network visualization was performed using CytoScape (V 3.7.2), and the neighborhood connectivity was analyzed using CytoScape's NetworkAnalyzer36,37.
Statistical analyses
Ecological factors, the relative abundance of OTUs, and neighborhood connectivity were analysed using One-ANOVA with tukey’s test in Origin (2022). Mantel test (bray–curtis distance), canonical correspondence analysis, Envfit test, and functional prediction were performed using the Novogene Cloud Platform (www.novogene.com). Pathogenic microbes and mycorrhizal fungi were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s test in Origin (2022).
Results
Changes of ecological factors
Using One-ANOVA analyses, we investigated the effects of blocks and crop-cultivated soils on ecological factors. At AM, BM, and CM, the block had no significant effect on the plant weight, the soil pH, and the microbial biomass C and N (Supplementary Table S1). The crop-cultivated soils significantly affected the plant weight (F = 5.82, P < 0.05) and the microbial biomass C (F = 4.30, P < 0.05) at AM, the soil pH (F = 4.52, P < 0.05) at BM, and the plant weight (F = 11.35, P < 0.01) and the microbial biomass C (F = 4.15, P < 0.05) at CM (Table 1). In all crop-cultivated soils at CM, astragalus-cultivated soils had the highest plant weight, followed by wheat, angelica and potato-cultivated soils (Table 1).
Co-occurrence networks
A total of 1,492,560 bacterial reads and 1,145,232 fungal reads were obtained from 36 samples. After filtering, 1,261,512 bacterial and 409,464 fungal reads were used in the study. In the rarefaction curves, the number of sequencing data provided sufficient information on microbial diversity (Supplementary Fig. S1). A total of 616 OTUs, 585 bacterial and 31 fungal, were obtained from 36 samples.
In order to better understand the interactions between OTUs and ecological parameters, co-occurrence networks between them were examined throughout the growth time-series. Neighborhood connectivity of a network is used to illustrate its complexity. The effect of crop-cultivated soils on neighborhood connectivity was analyzed by One-ANOVA. The results showed that crop-cultivated soils significantly affected the neighborhood connectivity of bacterial networks (F = 57.690, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2), but did not significantly affect the neighborhood connectivity of fungal networks (F = 1.998, P > 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S2). In the bacterial networks (Fig. 2), the neighborhood connectivity of astragalus-cultivated soils was higher than that of other soils. In the bacterial networks of astragalus-cultivated soils, the edges/nodes ratio of 2.09 was higher than that of other soils, and the positive/negative relationship ratio of 0.999 was also higher than that of other soils. These results showed that the bacterial microbiota in astragalus-cultivated soils was closely related to the ecological factors. Moreover, in the fungal networks of astragalus-cultivated soils (Supplementary Fig. S2), the positive/negative relationship ratio of 1.26 was higher than that of other soils. In terms of neighborhood connectivity, bacteria were more sensitive than fungi to the changes in the crop-cultivated soils.
Pathogenic microbes and mycorrhizal fungi
FAPROTAX and FUNGUILD databases were used to predict pathogenic microbes and mycorrhizal fungi in the microbiotas. Using Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s test, crop-cultivated soils obviously affect the relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (H = 8.228, P < 0.05) and ectomycorrhizal fungi (H = 12.484, P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). The relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in astragalus-cultivated soils was significantly higher than that in angelica-cultivated soils, and the same result was observed for ectomycorrhizal fungi in astragalus-cultivated soils. Astragalus-cultivated soils had the highest relative abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi in all crop-cultivated soils. Additionally, we found that Rhizoctonia solani, one of the pathogens associated with A. sinensis, occupied all crop-cultivated soils throughout the growth stage, with the lowest average relative abundance in astragalus-cultivated soils.
Drivers of microbial communities
Mantel test provides a means to test the correlation of multivariate data and is widely used in ecological studies. The correlations between the microbiotas and the ecological factors were investigated by the Mantel test (Tables 2 and 3). The bacterial and fungal microbiotas were significantly correlated with the plant weight in all crop-cultivated soils, showing that the bacterial and fungal microbiotas were intimately related to the seedling growth. In the study, only the pH of astragalus-cultivated soils was significantly related to both the bacterial and fungal microbiotas, implying that this soil pH may facilitate the assembly of the bacterial and fungal microbiotas. Except for the precipitation, all other ecological factors in astragalus-cultivated soils were significantly correlated with the bacterial and fungal microbiotas.
Canonical correspondence analysis is a nonlinear multivariate direct gradient analysis method in ecological studies. This method can easily determine the causal relationships between species distributions and environmental variables. In this study, it was used to assess the association between bacterial and fungal microbiotas and ecological factors. We found that each growth stage has its own major drivers in all crop-cultivated soils (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S3). Climate temperature and soil pH at AM, precipitation at BM, and plant weight as well as microbial biomass C and N at CM were the major drivers of the bacterial microbiotas (Fig. 3). Similar findings were also found in the fungal microbiotas (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Envfit test was used to identify the environmental factors that significantly affected the microbial communities. The results described the drivers for the assembly of bacterial and fungal microbiotas (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S3). For all crop-cultivated soils, the plant weight and precipitation were two significant factors affecting the assembly for the bacterial microbiota (Fig. 3), while the microbial biomass C was only one significant factor for the fungal microbiota (Supplementary Fig. S3). These results indicated that the bacterial microbiota was more sensitive to ecological factors than the fungal microbiota. Additionally, the factors that significantly affected the assembly of the bacterial and fungal microbiotas from a crop-cultivated soil were distinct. We found that more ecological factors that influenced the bacterial and fungal microflora in astragalus-cultivated soils, demonstrating a closer relationship between the microbiotas and the ecological factors in astragalus-cultivated soils.
Discussion
Properties of crop-cultivated soils are affected by the planting management of previous crops. It is well known that when former plants complete a life cycle, they can lead to soil properties that differ from bulk soils38,39,40. Different soil properties resulted in variations in soil basic fertility, which in turn led to differences in soil ecological factors. In this study, crop-cultivated soils at different growth stages differently impacted the ecological factors of the rhizosphere microbiota. The seedling weight in astragalus-cultivated soils was higher than that of other soils. Because the root system and growth power of seedlings were strong and the root disease incidence and disease index were low, which was discussed by Jin et al.5. Bai et al.6 explained the advantages of pea-astragalus alternate soil for cultivating high-quality angelica seedlings from the relative conductivity, amino acid leakage rate, automatic oxidation rate, soluble protein content, sugar content, malondialdehyde content as well as superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase activities.
In the study, the number of bacterial OTUs was almost six times higher than that of fungal OTUs, and similar results in other plants had been reported41,42. Network analysis based on the correlation between factors is widely used in soil microbial ecology43, for example, between soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities44, and between plant growth age and microbial communities45. Network analysis could help researchers understand that the microbiome in complex systems was influenced by the gradient changes in ecological factors, and infer the assembly rules of microbial communities. However, there is a lack of theoretical models to explain complex relationships between organisms using network diagram parameters46. In this study, these correlations between OTUs and factors may reflect the changes in microbial ecological behavior (niche) caused by specific soil-driven environmental variations47,48. Chamberlain et al.13 found that corn-soybean rotation resulted in variations in nutrient availability, soil organic matter content and pH, and that had an impact on the structure of bacterial communities in the bulk soil, which differed from continuously cropped corn and soybean. Based on our findings, we concluded that crop-cultivated soils distinctly affected the interactions between the microbiota and the ecological factors. Using the neighborhood connectivity as an indicator of network complexity, the bacterial network of astragalus-cultivated soils was more complex than that of other soils. The stability of this network may be higher than that of other networks49. Therefore, this bacterial microbiota may have a greater ability to resist external disturbances50,51.
Previous studies showed that root border cells, root exudates, and root deposits act as nutrient substances that recruit the members of rhizosphere microbiota52,53,54, which could explain our finding that the rhizosphere microbiota was closely associated with the plant weight. The similar result was also found in a new study, reporting that the rhizosphere microbial community composition of Medicago sativa was significantly correlated with M. sativa biomass55. By analyzing the results of Mantel test, we concluded that among crop-cultivated soils, the bacterial and fungal microbiotas in astragalus-cultivated soils were most closely related to their ecological factors.
In the study, the major drivers of the bacterial and fungal microbiotas in each crop-cultivated soil were different, which may be related to soil properties caused by the previous crop growth process56. This mean that there is more environmentally-driven ecological variance in these plots. Previous studies have also reported that crop rotation or former crop cultivation had influences on soil microbial biomass57, enzyme activities58, and microbial microbiotas59. The pH is one of the most important soil properties. Many studies have shown that soil pH is a major driver for the assembly of soil bacterial and fungal microbiotas60,61,62. Soil pH was the major driver in the early growth stage, which should be an important factor to be considered when choosing the bed soil for the seedling growth. For example, soil pH was assessed in the farmland of tomato63, maize64 and haskap60. In our study, only the pH of astragalus-cultivated soils was shown to be closely connected to the bacterial and fungal microbiotas, as confirmed by Mantel test and Envfit test. Therefore, the pH of astragalus-cultivated soils was possibly beneficial to the assembly of the bacterial and fungal microbiotas. The location where the seedlings were nurtured is a rainfed agroecosystem. The results showed that precipitation was the main driver of bacterial and fungal microbiotas in the middle growth stage. Many studies have found that the amount of water irrigation affects the structure of soil microbiotas64,65. Previous studies showed that soil microbes were more responsive to soil management66, and their biomass as reservoirs of soil C and N parameters was an important indicator in soils67. Soil microbial biomass can be regulated by fertilization practices68,69. Tan et al.70 found that the soil microbial biomass C in a peanut cropping system was significantly increased by applying biochar plus organic fertilizer. Liu, et al.71 and Li et al.72 found that microbial biomass N was enhanced by N fertilization.
Additionally, in terms of the network neighborhood connectivity and Envfit test, we found that the bacterial microbiota was more sensitive to the changes of the crop-cultivated soils than the fungal microbiota. This differential response could be due to the distinction in soil moisture73, soil organic carbon74 or root activity42. The balance between beneficial and harmful microbes in rhizosphere is one of the important factors affecting plant health75. Many studies reported the mycorrhizal fungi on legume plants76,77. Astragalus-cultivated soils were characterized by the lower relative abundance of the pathogenic bacteria and fungi as well as the higher relative abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi. This microbial ecology environment may be more beneficial to the seedling growth78,79.
Conclusion
We investigated the rhizosphere microbiome of A. sinensis seedlings cultivated in four crop-cultivated soils at a geo-authentic habitat. Overall, astragalus-cultivated soils exhibited the following properties: the highest plant weight, the highest neighborhood connectivity in the bacterial network, the highest ratio of positive/negative relationship in both bacterial and fungal networks, the highest relative abundance of the ectomycorrhizal fungi and the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the lowest relative abundance of R. solani, the suitable soil pH, and the close relationship between the rhizosphere microbiotas and the ecological factors. Therefore, the astragalus-cultivated soil was a suitable bed soil for nurturing A. sinensis seedlings to replace the undisturbed alpine meadow soils. The study increased the understanding of the rhizosphere microbiome of A. sinensis seedlings at a geo-authentic habitat.
Data availability
The raw data of the sequence had been deposited into the NCBI Short Read Archive under accession PRJNA720350 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA720350).
References
An, Z., Guo, F., Chen, Y., Bai, G. & Chen, Z. Rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities during the growth of Angelica sinensis seedlings cultivated in an Alpine uncultivated meadow soil. PeerJ 8, e8541. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8541 (2020).
Munkholm, L. J., Heck, R. J. & Deen, B. Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield. Soil Tillage Res. 127, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.02.007 (2013).
Jiao, X. L. et al. Effects of maize rotation on the physicochemical properties and microbial communities of American ginseng cultivated soil. Sci. Rep. 9, 8615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44530-7 (2019).
Wang, X., Chen, Y., Guo, F., Yuan, H. & Guo, Y. Effects of medicinal crop stubbles on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Angelica sinensis seedings. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 40, 2002–2006 (2017).
Jin, Y. et al. Effect of various crop residues on growth and disease resisitance of Angelica sinensis seedlings in Min County. Acta Pratacul. Sin. 27, 69–78 (2018).
Bai, G., Guo, F., Chen, Y., Yuan, H. & Xiao, W. Differences in physiological resistance traits of Angelica sinensis seedlings from uncultivated and cultivated fields in Min County. Acta Pratacul. Sin. 28, 86–95 (2019).
Bai, G. et al. Regulated effects of preceding crop on soil property and cultivating seedlings for Angelica sinensis on cultivated farmland. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 28, 701–712. https://doi.org/10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.190719 (2020).
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P. & Raaijmakers, J. M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 634–663 (2013).
Tkacz, A., Cheema, J., Chandra, G., Grant, A. & Poole, P. S. Stability and succession of the rhizosphere microbiota depends upon plant type and soil composition. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. 9, 2349–2359. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.41 (2015).
Berg, G. et al. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0 (2020).
Chaparro, J. M., Badri, D. V. & Vivanco, J. M. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 8, 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.196 (2014).
Uroz, S. et al. Specific impacts of beech and Norway spruce on the structure and diversity of the rhizosphere and soil microbial communities. Sci. Rep. 6, 27756. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27756 (2016).
Chamberlain, L. A. et al. Crop rotation, but not cover crops, influenced soil bacterial community composition in a corn-soybean system in southern Wisconsin. Appl. Soil Ecol. 154, 103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103603 (2020).
Classen, A. T. et al. Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial-plant interactions: What lies ahead?. Ecosphere 6, 130. https://doi.org/10.1890/es15-00217.1 (2015).
Tiemann, L. K. et al. Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecol. Lett. 18, 761–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12453 (2015).
Maldonado, S. et al. Enhanced crop productivity and sustainability by using native phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria in the agriculture of arid zones. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 4, 607355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.607355 (2020).
Gómez Expósito, R., de Bruijn, I., Postma, J. & Raaijmakers, J. M. Current insights into the role of rhizosphere bacteria in disease suppressive soils. Front. Microbiol.y 8, 2529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02529 (2017).
Li, X., Rui, J., Mao, Y., Yannarell, A. & Mackie, R. Dynamics of the bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of a maize cultivar. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.017 (2014).
Fierer, N. et al. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. Int. Soc. Microb. Ecol. 6, 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.159 (2012).
Kuffner, M. et al. Culturable bacteria from Zn- and Cd-accumulating Salix caprea with differential effects on plant growth and heavy metal availability. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108, 1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04670.x (2010).
De Corato, U. Disease-suppressive compost enhances natural soil suppressiveness against soil-borne plant pathogens: A critical review. Rhizosphere 13, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100192 (2020).
Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G. & Jenkinson, D. S. Chloroform fumigation chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 837–842 (1985).
Arnebrant, K. & Schnürer, J. Changes in atp content during and after chloroform fumigation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 875–877 (1990).
Toju, H. et al. Community composition of root-associated fungi in a Quercus-dominated temperate forest: “codominance” of mycorrhizal and root-endophytic fungi. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.546 (2013).
Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2276 (2013).
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).
Haas, B. J. et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21, 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112730.110 (2011).
Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604 (2013).
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07 (2007).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2013).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Louca, S., Parfrey, L. W. & Doebeli, M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science 353, 1272 (2016).
Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006 (2016).
Sisk-Hackworth, L., Ortiz-Velez, A., Reed, M. B. & Kelley, S. T. Compositional data analysis of periodontal disease microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 12, 617949. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.617949 (2021).
Khan, M. A. W. et al. Deforestation impacts network co-occurrence patterns of microbial communities in Amazon soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, fiy230. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy230 (2019).
Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Shi, P. & Wei, G. Co-occurrence patterns of soybean rhizosphere microbiome at a continental scale. Soil Biol. Biochem. 118, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.12.011 (2018).
Huang, M., Jiang, L., Zou, Y., Xu, S. & Deng, G. Changes in soil microbial properties with no-tillage in Chinese cropping systems. Biol. Fertil. Soils 49, 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0778-6 (2013).
Unger, P. W. & Cassel, D. K. Tillage implement disturbance effects on soil properties related to soil and water conservation: A literature review. Soil Tillage Res. 19, 363–382 (1991).
Alvarez, R. & Steinbach, H. S. A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas. Soil Tillage Res. 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.02.005 (2009).
Essel, E. et al. Bacterial and fungal diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil under different long-term tillage and cereal/legume rotation. Soil Tillage Res. 194, 104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104302 (2019).
Zhu, Q., Wang, N., Duan, B., Wang, Q. & Wang, Y. Rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities succession patterns related to growth of poplar fine roots. Sci. Total Environ. 756, 143839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143839 (2021).
Guseva, K. et al. From diversity to complexity: Microbial networks in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 169, 108604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108604 (2022).
Jiang, B. et al. Analysis of microbial community structure and diversity in surrounding rock soil of different waste dump sites in fushun western opencast mine. Chemosphere 269, 128777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128777 (2020).
Liu, J. et al. Pecan plantation age influences the structures, ecological networks, and functions of soil microbial communities. Land Degrad. Dev. 33, 3294–3309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4389 (2022).
Lv, X. et al. Strengthening insights in microbial ecological networks from theory to applications. mSystems 4, e00124-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00124-19 (2019).
Toju, H., Kishida, O., Katayama, N. & Takagi, K. Networks depicting the fine-scale co-occurrences of fungi in soil Horizons. PLoS ONE 11, e0165987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165987 (2016).
Chun, S. J., Cui, Y., Baek, S. H., Ahn, C. Y. & Oh, H. M. Seasonal succession of microbes in different size-fractions and their modular structures determined by both macro- and micro-environmental filtering in dynamic coastal waters. Sci. Total Environ. 784, 147046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147046 (2021).
Cardinale, M., Grube, M., Erlacher, A., Quehenberger, J. & Berg, G. Bacterial networks and co-occurrence relationships in the lettuce root microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12686 (2015).
Zhou, Z. et al. Increases in bacterial community network complexity induced by biochar-based fertilizer amendments to karst calcareous soil. Geoderma 337, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.013 (2019).
Olesen, J. M., Bascompte, J., Dupont, Y. L. & Jordano, P. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 19891–19896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706375104 (2007).
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Root biomass and exudates link plant diversity with soil bacterial and fungal biomass. Sci. Rep. 7, 44641. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44641 (2017).
Hassan, M. K., McInroy, J. A. & Kloepper, J. W. The interactions of rhizodeposits with plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria in the rhizosphere: A review. Agriculture 9, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9070142 (2019).
Sasse, J., Martinoia, E. & Northen, T. Feed your friends: Do plant exudates shape the root microbiome?. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 (2018).
Zhang, F., Xu, X., Wang, G., Wu, B. & Xiao, Y. Medicago sativa and soil microbiome responses to Trichoderma as a biofertilizer in alkaline-saline soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 153, 103573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103573 (2020).
Woźniak, A. Chemical properties and enzyme activity of soil as affected by tillage system and previous crop. Agriculture 9, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9120262 (2019).
Choudhary, M. et al. Changes in soil biology under conservation agriculture based sustainable intensification of cereal systems in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Geoderma 313, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.041 (2018).
Ai, C. et al. Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation. Geoderma 319, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.010 (2018).
Gałązka, A., Gawyjołek, K., Perzyński, A., Gałązka, R. & Jerzy, K. Changes in enzymatic activities and microbial communities in soil under long-term maize monoculture and crop rotation. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 26, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/64745 (2017).
Tremblay, C., Deslauriers, A., Lafond, J., Lajeunesse, J. & Paré, M. Effects of soil pH and fertilizers on haskap (Lonicera caerulea L) vegetative growth. Agriculture 9, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9030056 (2019).
Sirisuntornlak, N. et al. Interactive effects of silicon and soil pH on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of maize. SILICON 13, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00427-z (2021).
Xu, Y., Ge, Y., Song, J. & Rensing, C. Assembly of root-associated microbial community of typical rice cultivars in different soil types. Biol. Fertil. Soils 56, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01406-2 (2019).
Putranta, H., Permatasari, A. K., Sukma, T. A. & Dwandaru, W. S. B. The effect of pH, electrical conductivity, and nitrogen (N) in the soil at yogyakarta special region on tomato plant growth. TEM J.-Technol. Educ. Manag. Inform. 8, 860–865. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-24 (2019).
Wang, J. et al. Effects of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on soil microorganism and maize growth. Plant Soil 302, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9453-8 (2007).
Yang, X., Zhu, K., Loik, M. E. & Sun, W. Differential responses of soil bacteria and fungi to altered precipitation in a meadow steppe. Geoderma 384, 114812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114812 (2021).
Balota, E. L., Colozzi Filho, A., Andrade, D. S. & Dick, R. P. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on microbial biomass and C and N mineralization in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Tillage Res. 77, 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.003 (2004).
Franchini, J., Crispino, C., Souza, R., Torres, E. & Hungria, M. Microbiological parameters as indicators of soil quality under various soil management and crop rotation systems in southern Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 92, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.12.010 (2007).
Li, X., Wang, T., Chang, S. X., Jiang, X. & Song, Y. Biochar increases soil microbial biomass but has variable effects on microbial diversity: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 749, 141593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141593 (2020).
Lynch, J. M. & Panting, L. M. Effects of season, cultivation and nitrogen fertiliser on the size of the soil microbial biomass. J. Sci. Food Agric. 33, 249–252 (1982).
Tan, G. et al. Effects of biochar application with fertilizer on soil microbial biomass and greenhouse gas emissions in a peanut cropping system. Environ. Technol. 42, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1620344 (2021).
Liu, C. et al. Linkages between nutrient ratio and the microbial community in rhizosphere soil following fertilizer management. Environ. Res. 184, 109261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109261 (2020).
Li, H. et al. Film mulching, residue retention and N fertilization affect ammonia volatilization through soil labile N and C pools. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 308, 107272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107272 (2021).
Jiao, P. et al. Bacteria are more sensitive than fungi to moisture in eroded soil by natural grass vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau. Sci. Total Environ. 756, 143899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143899 (2021).
Sommer, J. et al. The tree species matters: Belowground carbon input and utilization in the myco-rhizosphere. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 81, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.07.001 (2017).
Yu, K., Pieterse, C. M. J., Bakker, P. A. H. M. & Berendsen, R. L. Beneficial microbes going underground of root immunity. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 2860–2870. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13632 (2019).
de Varennes, A. & Goss, M. J. The tripartite symbiosis between legumes, rhizobia and indigenous mycorrhizal fungi is more efficient in undisturbed soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2603–2607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.007 (2007).
Wang, X. et al. Mycorrhizal symbiosis modulates the rhizosphere microbiota to promote rhizobia-legume symbiosis. Mol. Plant 14, 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.002 (2020).
Zhang, R., Vivanco, J. M. & Shen, Q. The unseen rhizosphere root-soil-microbe interactions for crop production. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.008 (2017).
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. & Bakker, P. A. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We are very thanks for the help of the farmers Yin-Zhong Lang, Zhi-Jun Guo and Tian-Ming Guo in field cultivation and management. The authors are also very grateful to Hong-Chao Yuan, Yan-Bo Jin, Jin-Yin Liu, Xiao-Qin Wang and Mei-Ling Xu for their diligent field scientific works and accompany in the alpine area.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31560175 and 31360317), Authentic Chinese Medicinal Materials Superiority Characteristic Industry Cluster-Construction of Improved Varieties Breeding (No. 2022GSCYJQ07-33), Provincial Modern Silk Road Cold and Drought Agricultural Chinese Herbal Medicine Industry Development Project (No. 2130122), A grant for the Chief Expert of Traditional Chinese Medicine Industry to Yuan Chen Provided by Gansu Provincial Department of Agriculture and Pastoral Affairs (No. GARS-ZYC-1), Breeding and Base Construction of New Varieties of Chinese Medicinal Plants (School-Enterprise Cooperation Projects), and Space Breeding of Chinese Medicinal Angelica and Astragalus (School-Enterprise Cooperation Projects).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.-X.G. and Y.C. conceived and designed the study. Z.-G.A., F.-X.G., G.B. and A.-F.G. performed the field test and laboratory works. Z.-G.A. interpreted and analyzed the data, as well as prepared the manuscript. Y.C. and F.-X.G. provided feedback and comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
An, ZG., Guo, FX., Chen, Y. et al. Astragalus-cultivated soil was a suitable bed soil for nurturing Angelica sinensis seedlings from the rhizosphere microbiome perspective. Sci Rep 13, 3388 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30549-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30549-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.