Abstract
Despite therapeutic advances, mortality of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is still high. Currently, the determination of prognosis which guides treatment decisions mainly relies on genetic markers. Besides molecular mechanisms, the ability of malignant cells to evade immune surveillance influences the disease outcome and, among others, the expression of checkpoints modulators contributes to this. In AML, functional expression of the checkpoint molecule OX40 was reported, but the prognostic relevance of OX40 and its ligand OX40L axis has so far not been investigated. Here we described expression and prognostic relevance of the checkpoint modulators OX40 and OX40L, analyzed on primary AML cells obtained from 92 therapy naïve patients. Substantial expression of OX40 and OX40L on AML blasts was detected in 29% and 32% of the investigated subjects, respectively, without correlation between the expression of the receptor and its ligand. Whereas OX40L expression was not associated with different survival, patients with high expression levels of the receptor (OX40high) on AML blasts survived significantly shorter than OX40low patients (p = 0.009, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.86), which identifies OX40 as novel prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target in AML patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive neoplasia with high mortality rates1 . The prognosis of patients is highly heterogeneous2,3 and routinely assessed by analysis of genetic mutations and cytogenetic aberrations including, among others, mutations in NPM1, CEBPA, FLT3 and TP53 genes as well as cytogenetic abnormalities such as t(8;21), inv(16), inv(3), and del(5q)4. Based on their genetic profile, patients are categorized according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score into three different risk-groups5. However, despite an accurate genetic and cytogenetic classification, patients who are considered to have a favorable or intermediate risk often suffer from dismal disease course and early death. Identification of additional prognostic markers for AML, e.g. by flow cytometry, could support treatment choice and thus improve the quality of care for these patients6,7.
Many malignancies display abnormal expression of immune checkpoint molecules which enable evasion from tumor immune surveillance. So far, this has been extensively investigated for the inhibitory checkpoints PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3 and LAG-3 on solid tumors8, but the same pathophysiological principle holds true for hematologic malignancies, and we recently reported on the functional role of the immune checkpoint modulator OX40 in AML9.
OX40 is a member of the TNF receptor family, which is mainly known to promote effector T cell differentiation, proliferation, long-term survival, and pro-inflammatory cytokines production, while inhibiting differentiation and suppressive activity of regulatory T cells (Tregs)10,11,12. We recently showed that signaling via its ligand OX40L expressed by NK cells promotes their activation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity9. Expression of OX40 on tumor cells and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes has been investigated in solid cancers, with at least partially conflicting results regarding its prognostic relevance13,14,15. Despite our previous findings about the expression of OX40 in AML, it is still unknown if OX40L is also expressed. Furthermore, the prognostic relevance of these markers has not been described.
Here we report on the expression of OX40 as well as its ligand OX40L in AML providing data obtained by analyzing molecular characteristics as well as disease outcome in 92 AML patients.
Results
Clinical characteristics of the AML patient cohort
OX40 and OX40L expression were analyzed using primary AML samples of 92 patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1. Of all analyzed patients, 31 presented with undifferentiated leukemia (M0: n = 9, M1: n = 22), 22 with immature granulocytic leukemia (M2: n = 16, M3: n = 6), and 38 with monocytic leukemia (M4: n = 17, M5: n = 21); one patient could not be classified according to the FAB classification. In 70 and 22 patients, primary AML and secondary AML was diagnosed, respectively. Patient age ranged from 21 to 86 years (with a median of 59 years) with a female: male ratio of 1:1.36. Patients comprised 6 cases with t (15; 17) and 4 with inv(16). FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD mutations were detected in 28 and 5 patients, respectively. NPM1 mutations were observed in 24 patients, while CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α (CEBPA) mutations, MLL-AF9 fusion gene and IDH2 mutation were seen in 6, 2 and 6 patients, respectively. Based on cytogenetics, patients were categorized according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score. Patient numbers in the favorable, intermediate and poor risk group were 33, 36 and 16, respectively. Seven patients could not be classified.
OX40 and OX40L expression on primary AML cells
Leukemic blasts were analyzed for OX40 and OX40L expression by flow cytometry as exemplified in Fig. 1a. Defining an SFI level of 1.5 as a margin for positivity, 29% and 32% of AML patients were found to express OX40 and OX40L, respectively (Fig. 1b,c). When the frequencies of OX40 positive and of OX40L positive cells (> 10%) were considered, 21% of AML patients were found to express OX40 and 21% OX40L (Fig. 1b,c). Among patients, highly variable surface levels of OX40 and OX40L were observed, reaching SFI levels up to 27.25 and up to 36.59, respectively. In addition, the percentage of OX40 and OX40L positive cells varied substantially for both molecules, ranging from 0% to almost 100% (Fig. 1b,c). No correlation between the expression of OX40 and OX40L on AML blasts was observed, both in terms of SFI and percentage of positive cells (Fig. 1d,e).
OX40 and OX40L expression and patients’ clinical and genetic features
Frequencies of OX40 positive cells differed among FAB subclasses (Fig. 2a), with a tendency to higher expression in subjects presenting with mature leukemia (FAB M5). Similarly, the frequency of OX40L positive cells varied among FAB subclasses, with a tendency to higher expression in subjects presenting with acute promyelocytic leukemia (FAB M3) and mature leukemia (FAB M5) and a significantly higher expression in FAB M3 compared to FAB M1 (Fig. 2b). No differences in OX40 and OX40L expression were observed when AML patients were grouped according to their myeloid (M0-M2) or monocytic (M4, M5) signature (Fig. 2c,d). Expression of OX40 and OX40L did not differ significantly between primary (pAML) and secondary AML (sAML) cases (Fig. 2e,f). When grouped according to NCCN risk classification, no difference in terms of OX40 and OX40L expression was observed among patients with intermediate, favorable, or poor risk (Fig. 2g,h).
The expression of OX40 and OX40L in patients with different genetic background was investigated (Table 2). Patients with FLT3-ITD mutation presented with higher OX40 expression levels (both SFI and percentage of positive cells) than FLT3 wild-type subjects. Moreover, OX40L expression levels (SFI and percentage of positive cells) were significantly higher in patients carrying translocation t(15:17) than in patients who did not present it, whereas CEBPA-mutated patients had lower expression levels of OX40L on leukemic blasts than CEBPA-wild type ones.
Association between OX40 and OX40L expression and clinical outcome
Next, we analyzed the association of OX40 and OX40L expression on AML cells with patient overall survival (OS) by a stratification of patients into four quartiles, according to the frequency of OX40 and OX40L positive cells. No OS difference was observed for patients displaying differing levels of OX40L expression (Fig. 3a). On the contrary, the OS differed significantly among the patients grouped into the different OX40 quartiles (p-value 0.023, with subjects in the fourth quartile (highest expression of OX40) presenting with the shortest OS (Fig. 3b). As the expression of OX40 associated with a negative outcome, the survival of all patients was further analyzed by using a calculated cut-off to group patients into OX40high and OX40low cases. Patients in the OX40high group were found to have survived significantly shorter compared to the OX40low group (p-value 0.009, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.87) (Fig. 3c). The worse outcome of OX40high patients was further confirmed in terms of progressive free survival (PFS), with OX40high subjects presenting a significantly shorter PFS compared to the OX40low cases (p-value 0.002, HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.82) (Fig. 3d).
Therapy regimes, i.e. anthracycline-based induction therapy, allogenic transplantation (ASCT) as well as supportive regimes, were similarly distributed in OX40high and OX40 low cases (Sup Table 1). Furthermore, when patients were grouped according to OX40 expression in quartiles, no differences were observed (sup. Table 2). Of note, OX40high subjects after ASCT showed a trend towards a shorter OS comparted to OX40low subjects (p-value 0.061, HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.10–1.14) (Fig. 3e). In addition, in a multivariate survival analysis including OX40 expression (high vs low expression), patients’ age (< 60 vs. ≥ 60 years), FLT3-ITD mutational status and ASCT status, OX40 expression on AML blasts was identified as independent risk factor for dismal outcome (Fig. 3f).
Discussion
The TNFR family member OX40 is an activating receptor that sustains T cell anti-tumor reactivity upon binding to OX40L, thereby acting as a stimulatory immune checkpoint. The prognostic relevance of the expression of OX40 and its ligand has been investigated in solid tumors. Results were at least partially conflicting in different neoplasia, as OX40 expression is associated with better survival and response to treatment, e.g. in ovarian cancer13, but also with more aggressive diseases, e.g. in breast cancer14,15. In AML, the impact of OX40 and OX40L expression has so far not been investigated in detail.
Here we analyzed the expression of OX40 and OX40L on peripheral blood blasts of 92 AML patients. Our results confirmed that AML cells express OX40 in a substantial proportion of cases and demonstrate that also its ligand, OX40L, can be expressed by AML cells. In our cohort, frequencies of OX40 and OX40L positive AML cases were 29% and 32%, respectively. Of note, no correlation between expression of OX40 and its OX40L on AML blasts was observed.
To gain further insight into the clinical relevance of OX40 and OX40L, patients were grouped according to various laboratory and clinical markers. Besides a trend towards a higher expression of OX40 and OX40L in patients with FAB M3 and M5 AML cases, neither molecule was differentially expressed in any of the FAB subtypes, and a significant difference of OX40L expression could be observed only in M3 patients compared to M1. In terms of patients’ age and disease origin (primary vs secondary AML), a higher expression of OX40 was identified in primary AML only with regards to SFI (Figure S1), while the frequencies of positive cells were found to be homogeneous for both markers in each group of patients. In addition, OX40 and OX40L positive patients were similarly distributed among the NCCN cytogenetic risk-groups. Nevertheless, an association between OX40 expression and the high-risk mutation FLT3-ITD was observed, which is consistent with recent results of a screening of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) transcriptome data conducted by Gu et al.16. Furthermore, patients presenting with the favorable risk mutation CEBPA had a lower expression of OX40L compared to CEBPA negative patients. Patients carrying the translocation t (15;17) exhibited higher levels of OX40L compared to t(15;17) negative patients, which is in line with the higher expression seen in M3 cases as described above. To our knowledge, this is the first time that such results are reported, and a validation by further analysis of larger cohorts of patients and by including other molecular approaches is certainly warranted.
Next, we analyzed whether the survival of patients associated with the expression of OX40 or OX40L and found no association between OX40L and disease outcome. On the other hand, the expression of the OX40 checkpoint molecule on AML blasts strongly associated with patients’ outcome and OX40high patients were found to have a significantly shorter survival compared to OX40low subjects, which held true both in terms of OS and PFS, thus representing the first description of the prognostic relevance of OX40 in AML. This association between the expression of OX40 at the molecular level and unfavorable disease outcome appears to corroborate the observation of Gu et al.16, who likewise reported a poorer outcome for AML patients with documented RNA expression of the OX40 gene in a retrospective TCGA analysis16. Furthermore, a multivariate survival analysis confirmed that OX40 represents a risk factor for shorter OS independently of age, FLT3-ITD and allogenic transplantation.
The mechanisms leading to the poorer outcome of OX40 positive AML patients so far remain unclear and warrant the conduct of detailed functional studies. The observation is, however, in accordance with our previously reported findings that signals transduced by OX40 into AML cells promote cells proliferation and survival, potentially due to an observed induction of cytokines that favor survival of leukemic cells9. Consistently, the interaction with either soluble or cell-bound OX40L might trigger the OX40 signaling, with OX40L being possibly provided by various cells of the immune system, but also by leukemic cells, even if no correlation between OX40 and OX40L expression on the very same AML blasts of a given patient was observed in our analysis. With this regard, an auto-stimulatory loop can be postulated at least for OX40 and OX40L double positive cells. However, further data are required to confirmed this hypothesis.
Other investigators reported that the expression of OX40 is associated with a mutated state of TP53, both in breast cancer17 and AML16, thus suggesting that OX40 is a hallmark of genetically more aggressive diseases. However, the reported association of high expression of the OX40 gene with shorter OS held true also for AML patients with wild type TP53 and FLT316. Together with our results, this indicates that OX40 expression correlates with a more aggressive disease regardless of the genetic background, possibly by effects on cell proliferation and survival and potentially also yet unidentified immune-mediated mechanisms. It is for example tempting to speculate that AML cells expressing OX40 might compete with T cells for the binding to OX40L, thus preventing the immune system to mount a sustained anti-tumor response.
Overall, our findings not only identify OX40 as novel prognostic parameter that might serve to better guide treatment decisions in AML. They are also of high relevance in light of approaches aiming to develop therapeutic options to modulate the OX40/OX40L molecular system and which could be implemented also in the treatment of AML patients. The so far conducted pre-clinical studies have evaluated agonistic OX40-antibodies, which were found to promote tumor regression in melanoma-, colon carcinoma-, and glioma-models, by reinforcing the immune response against the malignant cells18,19,20. Consistently, promising clinical and immunologic results in terms of T-cell activation were achieved in two Phase I trials investigating 9B12 and MEDI6469, OX40-agonist antibodies, in patients with metastatic solid cancers and locally advanced neck squamous cell carcinoma21,22. Furthermore, several OX40 agonistic antibodies are being evaluated in early clinical trials alone or in combination with other checkpoints inhibitors for the treatment of solid cancers23,24. On the contrary, results of only one phase I trial in relapsed/refractory AML patients investigating an OX40 agonist are available, showing a favorable safety profile, but failed to achieve any response25,26. This is of particular interest in light of the findings presented in the present study and our previous results on the functional role of OX40 signaling into AML cells9, which shed light into a potential dual role of the OX40/OX40L axis that needs to be considered when designing clinical studies, e.g. by using targeted approaches like bispecific antibodies allowing to restrict agonistic effects to the desired immune stimulation, while preventing undesired survival modulation by OX40 signaling into AML cells that could promote the disease and impair patients’ survival.
In conclusion, to our knowledge, this is the first study reporting on the clinical relevance of the expression of both OX40 and OX40L in AML patients. The observed significant association of OX40 with shorter OS and PFS highlights the suitability of OX40 as prognostic marker for AML and provides important information for approaches aiming to engraft OX40 modulation for immunotherapy of cancer.
Methods
Patients’ samples and clinical characterization
Peripheral blood samples of 92 patients with AML were obtained at primary diagnosis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of patients were isolated by density gradient centrifugation and used for flow cytometry. Median observational time for all patients was 12.16 months (IQR 1.52–32.96 months). Diagnosis and classification of AML samples relied on morphology and cytochemistry of bone marrow according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification27. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses were performed at the University of Ulm with standard methods. All analyses were performed in agreement with the local ethic committee (project number: 13/2007 V) as well as with relevant regulation and guidelines of the University of Tuebingen. Patients signed an informed consent prior to study inclusion and all the analysis have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Flow cytometry
PBMC of AML patients (0.5 × 106 cells per staining) were incubated in medium containing human IgG (10 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to prevent unspecific Fc-receptor binding prior to the staining, then washed and incubated with unconjugated OX40 and OX40L mAb (clone BerAct35 and ANC10G1, Ancell, Stillwater, MN) or isotype control at 10 μg/ml, followed by species-specific PE-conjugated antibodies (1:100, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA). After staining for expression for OX40/OX40L, AML blasts within PBMC were identified according to the immune phenotype obtained at diagnosis by simultaneous staining for CD33-PacificBlue, CD34-APC, CD38-FITC, CD117-PE-Cy7, and CD13-APC-Cy7 with an antibody staining cocktail. Fluorescence-conjugates (CD13, CD33, CD34, CD38, and CD117, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) were used in 1:100–1:200 dilutions. Dead cells were excluded based on 7-AAD (1:200, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) positivity. Specific fluorescence indices (SFIs) were calculated by dividing median fluorescence obtained with anti-OX40 and OX40L mAbs by median fluorescence obtained with the IgG1 isotype control. Positive expression was defined as SFI ≥ 1.5. Measurements were conducted using an LSR Fortessa or a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), and for every sample at least 100,000 cells were recorded and used for further gating as shown in Fig. 1A. Data analysis was performed with FlowJo_V10 software (FlowJo LCC, Ashland, OR).
Statistical analysis
Data are shown as mean ± SD and boxplots including median and 25% and 75% quartiles as well as min/max whiskers. To compare individual groups, the 2-tailed unpaired Mann–Whitney test or Kruskal–Wallis test were used. Patients with missing genetic data were excluded in the respective analysis. The correlation between the expression of OX40 and OX40L was analyzed using spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Distribution of overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Log-rank test was performed to compare survival between groups. For predictive cut-off value estimation, we sub-grouped OX40 and OX40L with respect to corresponding OS times using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. Value of highest Youden index was used as cut-off. Cut-off values of 10.79% enabled further separation of cases in OX40high/OX40low according to the frequency of OX40 positive cells. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP® Pro (SAS Institute, Version 14.2) and GraphPad Prism 9.1.2 software. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Data availability
The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and all authors shared final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Shallis, R. M., Wang, R., Davidoff, A., Ma, X. & Zeidan, A. M. Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: Recent progress and enduring challenges. Blood Rev. 36, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2019.04.005 (2019).
Dohner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129(4), 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196 (2017).
Estey, E. H. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2019 update on risk-stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 93(10), 1267–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25214 (2018).
De Kouchkovsky, I. & Abdul-Hay, M. Acute myeloid leukemia: A comprehensive review and 2016 update. Blood Cancer J. 6(7), e441. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2016.50 (2016).
O’Donnell, M. R. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia version 3.2017 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 15(7), 926–57 (2017).
Heitmann, J. S. et al. Fc gamma receptor expression serves as prognostic and diagnostic factor in AML. Leuk. Lymphoma 61(10), 2466–2474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2020.1775208 (2020).
Heitmann, J. S. et al. Identification of CD318 (CDCP1) as novel prognostic marker in AML. Ann. Hematol. 99(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-03907-9 (2020).
Marcucci, F., Rumio, C. & Corti, A. Tumor cell-associated immune checkpoint molecules drivers of malignancy and stemness. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1868(2), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.10.006 (2017).
Nuebling, T. et al. The immune checkpoint modulator OX40 and its ligand OX40L in NK-Cell immunosurveillance and acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0212 (2018).
Croft, M. Control of immunity by the TNFR-related molecule OX40 (CD134). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101243 (2010).
Ito, T. et al. OX40 ligand shuts down IL-10-producing regulatory T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103(35), 13138–13143. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603107103 (2006).
Rogers, P. R., Song, J., Gramaglia, I., Killeen, N. & Croft, M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity 15(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00191-1 (2001).
Ramser, M. et al. High OX40 expression in recurrent ovarian carcinoma is indicative for response to repeated chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 18(1), 425. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4339-0 (2018).
Xie, F. et al. Costimulatory molecule OX40/OX40L expression in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: An immunohistochemistry-based pilot study. Pathol. Res. Pract. 206(11), 735–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2010.05.016 (2010).
Massarelli, E. et al. High OX-40 expression in the tumor immune infiltrate is a favorable prognostic factor of overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Immunother. Cancer. 7(1), 351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0827-2 (2019).
Gu, S., Zi, J., Han, Q., Song, C. & Ge, Z. Elevated TNFRSF4 gene expression is a predictor of poor prognosis in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell Int. 20, 146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01213-y (2020).
Liu, Z. et al. TP53 mutations promote immunogenic activity in breast cancer. J. Oncol. 2019, 5952836. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5952836 (2019).
Kjaergaard, J. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of OX-40 receptor antibody depends on tumor immunogenicity and anatomic site of tumor growth. Cancer Res. 60(19), 5514–5521 (2000).
Weinberg, A. D. et al. Engagement of the OX-40 receptor in vivo enhances antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 164(4), 2160–2169. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.2160 (2000).
Andarini, S. et al. Adenovirus vector-mediated in vivo gene transfer of OX40 ligand to tumor cells enhances antitumor immunity of tumor-bearing hosts. Cancer Res. 64(9), 3281–3287. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3911 (2004).
Curti, B. D. et al. OX40 is a potent immune-stimulating target in late-stage cancer patients. Cancer Res. 73(24), 7189–7198. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4174 (2013).
Duhen, R. et al. Neoadjuvant anti-OX40 (MEDI6469) therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma activates and expands antigen-specific tumor-infiltrating T cells. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21383-1 (2021).
Mascarelli, D. E. et al. Boosting antitumor response by costimulatory strategies driven to 4–1BB and OX40 T-cell receptors. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 692982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.692982 (2021).
Yadav, R. & Redmond, W. L. Current clinical trial landscape of OX40 agonists. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 24(7), 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-022-01265-5 (2022).
Short, N. J. et al. A multi-arm phase Ib/II study designed for rapid, parallel evaluation of novel immunotherapy combinations in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2022.2062345 (2022).
Short, N. J. et al. Interim results of an open-label phase IB/II multi-arm study of OX40 agonist monoclonal antibody (mAb), Anti-PDL1 Mab, smoothened Inhibitor, Anti-CD33 Mab, Bcl-2 Inhibitor, and Azacitidine as single-agents and as combinations for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 136(5), 6 (2020).
Bennett, J. M. et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: A Report of the French-American-British cooperative group. Ann. Intern. Med. 103(4), 620–5. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-620 (1985).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Valentina Agrusa for expert technical assistance.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SA1360/9–3 to HRS, MA 9302/2–1 to MeM), Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung (2017.100.2 to HRS), Deutsche Krebshilfe (70113999 to HRS, 70113496 to MeM), Germany´s Excellence Strategy (EXC 2180/1) and by the Open Access Publishing Found, University of Tübingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.R.S., M.e.M. and J.S.H. designed research. J.K. and M.a.M. performed and analyzed flow cytometry experiments. J.S.H. and M.a.M. collected clinical data. J.S.H. and M.a.M. performed statistical analyses. J.S.H., M.e.M and M.a.M wrote the manuscript. All authors read, revised and accepted the submitted manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Marconato, M., Kauer, J., Salih, H.R. et al. Expression of the immune checkpoint modulator OX40 indicates poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Rep 12, 15856 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19972-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19972-1
This article is cited by
-
Induction of NK cell reactivity against acute myeloid leukemia by Fc-optimized CD276 (B7-H3) antibody
Blood Cancer Journal (2024)
-
OX40/OX40 ligand and its role in precision immune oncology
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2024)
-
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: immune escape mechanisms and current implications for therapy
Molecular Cancer (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.