Abstract
Herein, we report an exotic domain-wall dynamics showing double Walker breakdowns in magnetic multilayer films composed of two magnetic layers. Such multiple Walker breakdowns are attributed to the internal magnetic dipole field, which is antisymmetric on the domain walls of the lower and upper magnetic layers. A micromagnetic simulation shows four phases of the domain-wall dynamics, which result in a phase diagram with the phase boundaries of the double Walker breakdown fields. Such double Walker breakdowns lead to two minima in the variation of the domain-wall velocity, as often observed experimentally.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Recently, magnetic thin films have drawn great technological attention because of their prospects for use in next-generation memory and logic devices1,2. The data bits in these devices are stored in their magnetization states and/or ordering structures such as magnetic domains and domain walls (DWs). The device operation is therefore performed by switching between the magnetization states as done for the magnetic random-access memory and/or the displacement of magnetic structures as done for the magnetic racetrack memory3,4. These magnetization dynamics and their characteristics are determined by magnetic parameters such as perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, and the spin–orbit coupling effect5,6,7,8,9. As these phenomena are generated at interfaces adjacent to magnetic layers, much effort has been devoted to controlling the interface properties in magnetic thin films and multilayered structures10.
For multilayered structures with multiple magnetic layers, the magnetic properties of each magnetic layer are largely determined by their own interfaces. Because ensuring the homogeneity among all interfaces is difficult, it is natural that each magnetic layer has magnetic properties different from the others11,12. Static magnetic properties, such as the stable DW configuration, have been reported to significantly affect the dynamics of the DW motion13. For example, a stable DW configuration determines the direction of DW motion driven by the spin–orbit torque. Therefore, it is essential to understand the layer resolved DW configurations and their roles in DW dynamics in magnetic multilayered structures.
Most of the studies of magnetic DW motion in magnetic multilayered structures was done without consideration of the DW configuration. Only a few studies have focused on the DW configurations in magnetic multilayered structures14,15. Since the magnetic DW motion in magnetic multilayered structures have drawn more attention in magnetic application devices1,2,3,4, more comprehensive understanding on the magnetic DW motion is required within the context of the DW configuration.
In this study, we prepared magnetic multilayered structures composed of two magnetic layers and then investigated the DW dynamics in these structures using a magneto-optical Kerr effect microscope. Interestingly, the magnetic multilayered structures exhibit an exotic coupled behavior of the DW dynamics. A micromagnetic study was carried out to explain the exotic coupled behavior within the context of multiple Walker breakdowns of DWs in each magnetic layer.
Results
Double minimum of DW velocity about H x
The DW displacements are measured along the direction (Fig. 5d, yellow arrow) parallel to Hx, providing the DW speed, \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\), in the direction of Hx. Figure 1a,b plot the measured \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) onto the 2-dimensional (2D) coordinate plane with respect to Hx (abscissa) and Hz (ordinate) for Samples I and II, respectively. Sample I exhibits a typical symmetrical \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation with respect to Hx. The line profile along the dashed red line in Fig. 1a is plotted in Fig. 1c, clearly confirming the symmetrical variation with a single minimum. Such symmetrical variation is known to be caused by the evolution of the stable DW configuration under the influence of Hx13.
Interestingly, Sample II shows an exotic variation of \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) with two minima, as shown in the 2D plot of Fig. 1b and the line profile in Fig. 1d. Though it is well known that the asymmetry of \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) near \(H_{x} \cong 0\) is ascribed to the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction13,16, the exotic variation with two minima goes well beyond the model based on a single DW configuration. To check whether the exotic variation with two minima is ascribed to the two magnetic layers as in Sample II, the coupled configuration between the DWs in the two magnetic layers was investigated by considering micromagnetism. The simulation results are discussed hereafter.
Multiple walker breakdown
The stationary DW configurations at \(H_{z} = 0\) were first examined under application of Hx over the range from 0 to 120 mT. Figure 2a–e shows the cross-sectional view of the stable DW configurations in the stationary state for different Hx values of (a) 0, (b) 30, (c) 60, (d) 90, and (e) 120 mT, respectively. The arrow inside each mesh shows the direction of the magnetization. The color of each arrow corresponds to the \(x\) component of the magnetization (red for + x direction and blue for − x direction), whereas the color inside each mesh corresponds to the z component of the magnetization (red for + z direction and blue for − z direction).
When \(H_{x} = 0\), as shown in Fig. 2a, the dipolar magnetic field from the lower magnetic layer generates a local magnetic field, \(H_{{{\text{dip}}}}\). For the present geometry, such \(H_{{{\text{dip}}}}\) has a net in-plane component along the + x direction (upper gray arrow) at the position of the DW in the upper magnetic layer. Thus, the upper DW becomes stabilized as the Néel-type configuration with internal magnetization along the + x direction. Inversely, the dipolar magnetic field from the upper magnetic layer generates a net \(H_{{{\text{dip}}}}\) along the − x direction (lower gray arrow) at the lower DW, thus resulting in the opposite Néel-type configuration along the − x direction. Consequently, an antiparallel alignment of the internal magnetization appears between the upper and lower DWs, as shown in Fig. 2a.
Under the application of Hx (blue arrows), the total in-plane magnetic field, \(H_{{{\text{tot}}}}\) (\(= H_{x} + H_{{{\text{dip}}}}\)) becomes unbalanced at positions between the upper and lower DWs. For the present geometry, an increase in Hx causes the decrease of Htot at the lower DW, as shown by the lower gray arrows in Fig. 2b,c. When Htot vanishes, the DW becomes a Bloch-type configuration, as shown in Fig. 2d. A further increase in Hx results in the parallel alignment of the internal magnetization between the upper and lower DWs, as shown in Fig. 2e.
To examine the effect of these different DW configurations, the DW speed, \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) is calculated under the application of Hz. Figure 2f–j plot \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) with respect to Hz for different Hx values. When \(H_{x} = 0\), as shown in Fig. 2f, \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) exhibits an abrupt breakdown at a certain strength of Hz. This breakdown is well known as the Walker breakdown, which is caused by the precession of the internal magnetization inside the DWs.
Phases of DW during DW motion
Figure 3a shows a 2D plot of \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) with respect to Hx (abscissa) and Hz (ordinate). It is clear from the plot of several different phases with phase boundaries. The phase boundaries are attributed to the Walker breakdown, below which a steady-state motion with a fixed magnetization angle appears, above which a precessional motion occurs. For better visualization, Fig. 3b illustrates the four phases: phase SS of steady-state motions (both DWs), phase PS of precessional (upper DW) and steady-state (lower DW) motions, phase SP of steady-state (upper DW) and precessional (lower DW) motions, and phase PP of precessional motions (both DWs). The phase boundaries indicate the Walker breakdown fields, \(H_{{\text{W}}}^{{\text{u}}}\) (red symbols) and \(H_{{\text{W}}}^{l}\) (black symbols), for the upper and lower DWs, respectively.
Inside the phase diagram, the line profiles (horizontal dashed lines) under a fixed Hz provide the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation with respect to Hx, similar to the experimental measurement procedure, shown in Fig. 1d.
DW velocity by walker breakdown
Figure 4a–c plot the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation with respect to Hx under several fixed Hz values. Here, the presents \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variations can be considered as the global \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) of the bilayer (as seen in Fig. 2) and then, be explained by the combined effect of the DWs of the lower and upper layers (as seen in Fig. 3). For a weak Hz, the line profile along the first horizontal dashed line in Fig. 3b stays inside phase SS for both DWs. The \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation almost exhibits a plateau in the middle with respect to Hx, as shown in Fig. 4a. However, a closer observation showed two separated minima with small amplitudes. These separated minima become obvious for an intermediate Hz, where the line profile along the second horizontal, dashed line in Fig. 3b crosses phases PS, SS, and SP. Because \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) in phases PS and SP is largely reduced owing to the Walker breakdown, the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation naturally exhibits two large minima inside these phases, as shown in Fig. 4b. Finally, for a strong Hz, the line profiles along the third horizontal dashed line in Fig. 3b cross phases PS, PP, and SP. Because the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) of phase PP is slower than those of the other phases owing to the Walker breakdowns for both DWs, its \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation exhibits a single minimum at the middle, that is, inside phase PP, as shown in Fig. 4c. Notably, the experimental value of Hz in Fig. 1b ranges between those values shown in Fig. 4a,b. Therefore, the double Walker breakdowns for each DW of the two magnetic layers can explain the experimental observation of the exotic \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation.
Discussion
The magnetic field for the breakdown is denoted as the Walker breakdown field, \(H_{{\text{W}}}\). According to Ref.17, \(H_{{\text{W}}}\) follows the relation, \(H_{{\text{W}}} = \alpha \sin \psi_{{\text{W}}} \left( {\left| {H_{{{\text{tot}}}} } \right| - H_{{{\text{DW}}}} \cos \psi_{{\text{W}}} } \right)\), where \(H_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) is the DW anisotropy field. Here, azimuthal angle \(\psi_{{\text{W}}}\) of the magnetization inside the DW is defined as \(\cos \psi_{{\text{W}}} = \left( {\left| {H_{{{\text{tot}}}} } \right| - \sqrt {H_{{{\text{tot}}}}^{2} + 8H_{{{\text{DW}}}}^{2} } } \right)/4H_{{{\text{DW}}}}\).
In addition, when \(H_{x} = 0\), both the upper and lower DWs have the same \(\left| {H_{{{\text{tot}}}} } \right|\) value, resulting in identical strengths of \(H_{{\text{W}}}\). Therefore, both DWs exhibit a single Walker breakdown simultaneously, as shown in Fig. 2f. However, under the application of \(H_{x}\), the upper and lower DWs have different values of \(\left| {H_{{{\text{tot}}}} } \right|\), resulting in different strengths of \(H_{{\text{W}}}\). This could possibly result in two separate Walker breakdowns. As \(H_{x}\) increases, such a separation becomes more obvious and dominant, as shown in Fig. 2g–j.
In summary, we investigated the phases of the DW motion among two magnetic layers. The micromagnetic simulation results reveal that each magnetic layer has a different internal dipolar magnetic field, and thus the DW in each magnetic layer experiences different magnetic fields. Owing to the different Walker breakdown fields for each DW, the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation exhibits two minima with respect to \(H_{x}\). The presented simulation results satisfactorily explain the experimental observation of the two minima in the \(v_{{{\text{DW}}}}\) variation.
Methods
Sample preparations and DW velocity measurements
For this study, we prepared two types of magnetic films with different numbers of magnetic layers. Here, we denote Samples I and II for films composed of a single magnetic layer and double magnetic layers, respectively. The detailed layered structures comprise 5-nm Ta/2.5-nm Pt/0.3-nm Co/1.5-nm Pt for Sample I and 5-nm Ta/2.5-nm Pt/0.3-nm Co/0.3-nm Pt/0.3-nm Co/1.5-nm Pt for Sample II, as illustrated in Fig. 5a,b, respectively. The films were deposited on Si wafers with a 100-nm SiO2 layer using dc magnetron sputtering.
Both films exhibited strong perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and clear magnetic domain patterns. Figure 5c,d shows the magnetic domain images of Samples I and II, respectively. Each image is overlaid with several snapshots taken by magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) microscopy at a specified time interval under the application of the out-of-plane magnetic field, \(H_{z}\) (red symbol), together with the in-plane magnetic field, \(H_{x}\) (blue arrow)13. The brightest circle in the middle represents the initial circular magnetic domain, which exhibits gradual expansion over time, as shown by the gradual change in image contrast.
Micromagnetic simulation
We employed the object-oriented micromagnetic framework (oommf) code in three-dimensional geometry. The simulation geometry was set as a lateral wire structure onto the film of two ferromagnetic (FM) layers separated by a nonmagnetic (NM) spacer. The lateral wire structure has a length of 2000 nm and a width of 250 nm. All FM and NM layers have an identical thickness of 0.4 nm. The mesh size was chosen to be 1 nm along the length, 250 nm along the width, and 0.4 nm along the thickness. For a fast simulation speed with minimal number of meshes, the mesh size along the width is set to be identical to the wire width. The mesh size along the length was set to be sufficiently small to describe the internal DW structures. The magnetic parameters are chosen as the typical values of Co/Pt multilayers, as given by the exchange stiffness of 5 × 10–12 J/m, saturation magnetization of 1.4 × 106 A/m, and surface magnetic anisotropy of 1.93 × 106 J/m318. For fast relaxation to the ground state, the damping constant was set at \(\alpha\) = 0.5.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Chappert, C., Fert, A. & Van Dau, F. N. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 147–157 (2007).
Luo, Z. et al. Current-driven magnetic domain-wall logic. Nature 579, 214–218 (2020).
Daughton, J. M. Magnetic tunneling applied to memory (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3758 (1997).
Parkin, S. S. P., Hayashi, M. & Thomas, L. Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory. Science 320, 190–194 (2008).
Bellec, A., Rohart, S., Labrune, M., Miltat, J. & Thiaville, A. Domain wall structure in magnetic bilayers with perpendicular anisotropy. Europhys. Lett. 91, 17009 (2010).
Haazen, P. P. J. et al. Domain wall depinning governed by the spin Hall effect. Nat. Mater. 12, 299–303 (2013).
Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).
Liu, L. et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).
Emori, S., Bauer, U., Ahn, S. M., Martinez, E. & Beach, G. S. D. Current-driven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nat. Mater. 12, 611–616 (2013).
Park, Y. K. et al. Interfacial atomic layers for full emergence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. NPG Asia Mater. 12, 38 (2020).
Hrabec, A. et al. Velocity enhancement by synchronization of magnetic domain walls. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 227204 (2018).
Lemesh, I. & Beach, G. S. D. Walker breakdown with a twist: Dynamics of multilayer domain walls and skyrmions driven by spin-orbit torque. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 044031 (2019).
Je, S. G. et al. Asymmetric magnetic domain-wall motion by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 88, 214401 (2013).
Purnama, I., Kerk, I. S., Lim, G. J. & Lew, W. S. Coupled Néel domain wall motion in sandwiched perpendicular magnetic anisotropy nanowires. Sci. Rep. 5, 8754 (2015).
Metaxas, P. J. Domain Wall Dynamics in Ultrathin Ferromagnetic Film Structures: Disorder, Coupling and Periodic Pinning (The University of Western Australia, 2009).
Moon, K.-W. et al. Magnetic bubblecade memory based on chiral domain walls. Sci. Rep. 5, 9166 (2015).
Thiaville, A., Rohart, S., Jué, É., Cros, V. & Fert, A. Dynamics of Dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin magnetic films. Europhys. Lett. 100, 57002 (2012).
Donahue, M. J. & Porter, D. G. OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.0. Interagency Report NISTIR 6376 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999).
Acknowledgements
Authors thank Soong-Geun Je for inspirational discussions. This work was supported by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, the Samsung Science and Technology Foundation (SSTF-BA1802-07), and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT (MSIT) (2015M3D1A1070465 and 2020R1A5A1016518).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.M. and D.-Y.K. designed this study. J.M. and S.-H.L. fabricated samples. J.M. and K.K. performed experiments. J.M. and J.Y. performed simulations. J.M., J.Y. and S.-B.C analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. J.M. and J.Y. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, J., Yoon, J., Kim, K. et al. Multiple Walker breakdowns in magnetic multilayers. Sci Rep 12, 2307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06275-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06275-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.