Abstract
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is essential for the type I interferon response induced by microbial DNA from virus or self-DNA from mitochondria/nuclei. In response to emergence of such DNAs in the cytosol, STING translocates from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi, and activates TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) at the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Activated TBK1 then phosphorylates STING at Ser365, generating an interferon regulatory factor 3-docking site on STING. How this reaction proceeds specifically at the TGN remains poorly understood. Here we report a cell-free reaction in which endogenous STING is phosphorylated by TBK1. The reaction utilizes microsomal membrane fraction prepared from TBK1-knockout cells and recombinant TBK1. We observed agonist-, TBK1-, “ER-to-Golgi” traffic-, and palmitoylation-dependent phosphorylation of STING at Ser365, mirroring the nature of STING phosphorylation in vivo. Treating the microsomal membrane fraction with sphingomyelinase or methyl-β-cyclodextrin, an agent to extract cholesterol from membranes, suppressed the phosphorylation of STING by TBK1. Given the enrichment of sphingomyelin and cholesterol in the TGN, these results may provide the molecular basis underlying the specific phosphorylation reaction of STING at the TGN.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The detection of microbial pathogens with nucleic acid sensors is a typical principle of innate immunity1,2. DNA-sensing or RNA-sensing proteins localize at various subcellular compartments and, upon binding to foreign nucleic acids, trigger innate immune signalling for host defence3. The DNA-sensing nucleotidyl transferase cGAS4, its product cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP)5, and the cGAMP sensor STING6 (also known as MITA7, ERIS8, MPYS9, or TMEM173) comprise a critical cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway in mammalian cells. STING is postulated to act as a scaffold to activate the downstream protein kinase TBK16,7,8,10,11. Activated TBK1 phosphorylates and activates interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), the essential transcription factor that drives type I interferon production12. During this process, TBK1 also phosphorylates STING at Ser365, generating the IRF3-docking site on STING13. STING is also phosphorylated at Ser365 by ULK1, and this phosphorylation is required for the termination of the STING signalling14.
STING is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized transmembrane protein. Upon its binding to cGAMP, STING translocates immediately to the Golgi with COP-II vesicles15,16. We and others have shown that the COP-II-mediated translocation of STING from the ER is required to activate the downstream signalling pathway15,16,17,18. In two autoinflammatory diseases, STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI)19,20 and the COPA syndrome21, STING is constitutively activated without DNA stimulation and localize not to the ER but to the perinuclear compartments that include the Golgi15,20,22,23,25,26. The interaction between STING and the downstream kinase TBK1 requires the translocation of STING from the ER to the Golgi15. Phosphorylated TBK1, the active form of TBK1, is exclusively localized to a subdomain within the TGN22. Together, these results demonstrate that the Golgi is an organelle at which STING recruits and activates TBK1 for triggering the STING-dependent innate immune response27.
As to the molecular mechanism underlying STING activation at the Golgi/TGN, we provide the evidence that palmitoylation of STING at the Golgi is essential to activate the downstream signalling pathway22,28,29. Disturbing Golgi lipid order by treating cells with D-ceramide-C6, which is converted to short-chain sphingomyelin, suppresses the activation of STING pathway22. These results suggest that certain Golgi lipids are involved in the STING activation, besides STING palmitoylation. However, because of the technical difficulty to deplete these lipids in cells, their involvement in the activation of STING signalling pathway has not been addressed.
In this work, we report a cell-free reaction in which endogenous STING is phosphorylated at Ser365 by recombinant TBK1. With this reaction, we demonstrate that sphingomyelin and cholesterol in the Golgi membrane are critical for STING activation.
Results
A cell-free reaction in which endogenous STING is phosphorylated by recombinant TBK1
To directly assess the roles of Golgi lipids in STING activation, we sought to develop a cell-free assay in which endogenous STING is phosphorylated by TBK1. To eliminate any contribution of cytosolic/endogenous TBK1 to STING phosphorylation, we decided to use microsomal membrane fraction prepared from TBK1-deficient cells as a membrane source containing endogenous STING.
TBK1-knockout (KO) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 technology (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1). We then validated the phosphorylation and membrane traffic of STING in these cells. TBK1-KO MEFs were stimulated with DMXAA, a membrane-permeable mouse-specific STING agonist. We chose 60 min for DMXAA treatment, because STING localized exclusively to the Golgi and activated TBK1 at this time point22 (Fig. 1b). As expected, 60 min after DMXAA stimulation, we observed the phosphorylation of STING at Ser365 in parental wild-type (WT) MEFs (Fig. 1a). In contrast, the phosphorylation was mostly suppressed in TBK1-KO MEFs.
DMXAA-stimulated TBK1-KO MEFs were harvested in isotonic buffer and homogenized. The homogenates were then centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min and the resulting post-nuclear supernatants were further centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min. The membrane fraction that floated just above 2 M sucrose cushion was collected and used as microsomal membrane fraction for the following in vitro reactions.
The microsomal membrane fraction was incubated with ATP and 100 ng of recombinant TBK1 at 37 °C for the indicated time periods (Fig. 2a,b). In the conditions where microsomal membrane fraction prepared from DMXAA-stimulated MEFs was used, the amount of phosphorylated STING at Ser365 increased gradually up to 60 min of incubation (Fig. 2b). The amount of STING was decreased after 120 min of incubation, suggesting the proteolytic degradation of STING (Supplementary Fig. S2). When microsomal membrane fraction of unstimulated cells was used for the reaction, the phosphorylated STING disappeared (Fig. 2b). These results suggested that STING phosphorylation by TBK1 stringently requires the agonist (DMXAA) stimulation.
Titration of the amount of TBK1 in the reaction showed that 100 ng of recombinant TBK1 was sufficient to detect the phosphorylated STING (Fig. 2c). Thus, we routinely used 100 ng of recombinant TBK1 at the following experiments. The phosphorylation reaction of STING by TBK1 was temperature-sensitive (Fig. 2d) and required ATP (Fig. 2e). In sum, a cell-free assay to phosphorylate endogenous STING at Ser365 was developed with the use of recombinant TBK1.
“ER-to-Golgi” traffic- and palmitoylation-dependent phosphorylation
The exocytic membrane traffic from the ER to the Golgi is required for the activation of the STING signalling pathway15,22,23,30. The treatment of cells with BFA (a fungal macrocyclic lactone that blocks “ER-to-Golgi” traffic31) suppressed the translocation of STING to the Golgi22 (Supplementary Fig. S3), the emergence of p-TBK1/p-STING/p-IRF315, and abolished the STING signalling22. Thus, we examined if the phosphorylation of STING in the cell-free assay also required the translocation of STING to the Golgi. Microsomal membrane fraction was prepared from cells treated with BFA and DMXAA. When the microsomal membrane fraction was subjected to the in vitro reaction, we found no phosphorylated STING (Fig. 3a). Addition of STING agonist i.e., DMXAA or 2′3′-cGAMP, to the in vitro reaction with the microsomal membrane fraction prepared from unstimulated cells did not promote the phosphorylation of STING (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. S4). These results suggested that (1) the binding of STING with its agonist alone was not sufficient to make STING the substrate for TBK1 and (2) STING translocation from the ER to the Golgi, which subsequently occurred after the binding of STING with its agonist, was required for the phosphorylation of STING.
STING undergoes palmitoylation at the Golgi and the inhibition of palmitoylation with 2-bromopalmitate (2-BP) suppressed the STING-dependent downstream signalling22. Microsomal membrane fraction was prepared from cells treated with 2-BP and DMXAA. When the microsomal membrane fraction was subjected to the in vitro reaction, we found no phosphorylated STING (Fig. 3c), consistently with the in vivo observation22.
A role of cholesterol and sphingomyelin in STING activation
We previously suggested the role of sphingomyelin in STING activation by the experiment with D-ceramide-C622, an agent to disrupt lipid domain containing sphingomyelin32. We sought to address directly the role of lipids constituting the lipid domain in STING activation with the cell-free reaction. Microsomal membrane fraction prepared from DMXAA-stimulated cells was digested with recombinant bacterial sphingomyelinase (bSMase), and then subjected to the in vitro reaction. As shown in Fig. 4a, we found no phosphorylated STING with bSMase-digested membranes. Pre-treatment of the microsomal membrane fraction with methyl-β-cyclodextrin, an agent to extract cholesterol from membranes, also suppressed the phosphorylation of STING by TBK1 in dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 4b). These results suggested the role of sphingomyelin and cholesterol in STING activation.
Discussion
In the present study, we developed a cell-free assay in which endogenous STING is phosphorylated by recombinant TBK1. The assay showed the dependency of STING phosphorylation on the STING agonist, TBK1, “ER-to-Golgi” traffic, and palmitoylation, which mirrored the nature of STING phosphorylation in vivo. With the assay, we provided an in vitro evidence that sphingomyelin and cholesterol in the Golgi membranes were involved in the STING activation. The assay should provide a useful biochemical complement to cell biological studies presently used to understand the molecular mechanism underlying the STING activation.
Protein palmitoylation has been implicated in the clustering of a number of proteins into a specific lipid microdomain “raft” enriched in cholesterol and sphingomyelin33. Cholesterol is suggested to be enriched at the TGN, and cholesterol together with sphingomyelin generated by sphingomyelin synthase 1 are thought to form lipid rafts at the TGN32. Together with the present findings by the cell-free experiments, we hypothesize that palmitoylated STING becomes clustered at the TGN with the aid of the raft, which facilitates the recruitment of TBK110,11 for phosphorylation of STING13.
Sphingomyelin at the TGN is demonstrated to be essential for transport carrier formation32. Cholesterol at the Golgi, the levels of which is regulated by oxysterol-binding protein, is essential for the Golgi localization of intra-Golgi v-SNAREs by ensuring proper COP-I vesicle transport34. Caveolin-1, a protein to form caveolae at the plasma membrane, accumulates in the Golgi when the cholesterol level in the Golgi is low35. The present study demonstrates another role of sphingomyelin and cholesterol at the Golgi/TGN in cellular signalling. The implication of these lipids in innate immune response may lead to new treatments for cytosolic DNA-triggered autoinflammatory diseases.
Methods
Antibodies
Antibodies used in this study were as follows: rabbit anti-TBK1 (ab40676, dilution 1:1000; Abcam); rabbit anti-phospho-STING (D8F4W, dilution 1:1000) (Cell signaling); rabbit anti-calnexin (10427-2-AP, dilution 1:1000), rabbit anti-STING antibody (19851-1-AP, dilution 1:1000 for western blot and immunofluorescence) (Proteintech); mouse anti-GM130 (610823, dilution 1:1000) (BD Biosciences); sheep anti-TGN38 (AHR499G, dilution 1:1000) (Bio-Rad); Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG(H + L) Mouse/Human ads-HRP (4050-05, dilution 1:10,000) (Southern Biotech); Alexa 488-, 594-, or 647-conjugated secondary antibodies (A21203, A21206, A21448, dilution 1:2000) (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Reagents
The following reagents were purchased from the manufacturers as noted: DMXAA (14617, Cayman), brefeldin A (11861, Cayman), methyl-β-cyclodextrin (332615, Sigma), recombinant bacterial sphingomyelinase (S7651, Sigma); 2-bromopalmitate (320-76562, Wako), recombinant TBK1 (Carna Biosciences, Inc.). lentiCas9-Blast (Addgene plasmid # 52962) and lentiGuide-Puro (Addgene plasmid # 52963) were gifts from Feng Zhang. psPAX2 (Addgene plasmid # 12260) and pMD2.G (Addgene plasmid # 12259) were gifts from Didier Trono.
Tag-free recombinant TBK1
N-Terminal GST-fusion full length human TBK1 protein (#05-115, Carna Biosciences) was treated with Turbo3C protease (Accelagen) at 4 °C overnight to cleave the GST-tag. The mixture was applied to a Glutathione Sepharose 4 Fast Flow column (#17-5132-03, Cytiva) and the flow-through fraction was collected.
Cell culture
MEFs22 were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine in a 5% CO2 incubator.
Generation of TBK1-KO cells by CRISPR-Cas9
MEFs that stably expressed Cas9 were established using lentivirus. HEK293T cells were co-transfected with lentiCas9-blast, psPAX2, and pMD2.G. The medium that contains the lentivirus was collected and filtered through 0.45 µm PVDF filter. WT MEFs were incubated with the medium for 6 h and then selected with blasticidin (5 µg/mL) for several days.
Single-guide RNAs (sgRNA) were designed to target mouse TBK1 genomic loci. The sgRNA (sense: 5′-caccgCATAAGCTTCCTTCGCCCAG-3′, antisense: 5′-aaacCTGGGCGAAGGAAGCTTATGc-3′) was cloned into a lentiGuide-Puro vector. The lentiviral plasmids, psPAX2, and pMD2.G were then co-transfected into HEK293T cells and the lentivirus-containing medium was collected. Cas9-expressing MEFs were incubated with the medium for 6 h and selected with puromycin (2 µg/mL) for several days. Single colonies were then isolated and the expression of TBK1 in each clone was analyzed by western blot. The genomic sequences of the clones were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Briefly, genomic DNA was first isolated, and PCR was performed to amplify the targeted regions using the following primers: 5′-TGCCGGATCCCTGAGAGGGTACAGGTTGCC-3′ (sense primer, BamHI site is underlined) and 5′-CACCGAATTCCTAGCCTGAAAGGCCTGGTG-3′ (antisense primer, EcoRI site is underlined). The PCR products were subsequently cloned into a pMX vector for sequencing analysis. For comparison, the same regions in the parental line were also sequenced. The sequencing data for the control and the knockout cells were then analyzed using Benchling.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 15 min and permeabilized with digitonin (50 µg/mL) in 3% BSA-PBS at room temperature for 5 min. Cells were then incubated with primary antibodies, then with secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa fluorophore.
Confocal microscopy
Confocal microscopy was performed using a LSM880 with Airyscan (Zeiss) with a 63 × 1.4 Plan-Apochromat oil immersion lens. Images were analyzed with Zeiss ZEN 2.3 SP1 FP3 (black, 64 bit) (ver. 14.0.21.201) and Fiji (ver. 2.0.0/1.52n).
In vitro assay of recombinant TBK1-dependent phosphorylation of STING
Cells were collected in an ice-cold buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 200 mM sucrose) containing protease inhibitors (25955-11, nacalai tesque), and phosphatase inhibitors (8 mM NaF, 12 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1.2 mM Na2MoO4, 5 µM cantharidin, and 2 mM imidazole), homogenized with 2 passages through a 27-gauge needle after 6 passages through a 23-gauge needle, and centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The post-nuclear supernatant was overlaid on 10 µL of 2 M sucrose and centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The membrane fractions were resuspended in a buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, 200 mM sucrose, 20 mM MgCl2, protease inhibitors, and phosphatase inhibitors), and incubated with ATP (1 mM) and recombinant TBK1 (100 ng) at 37 °C for 30 min. The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation of STING was detected by western blot.
Western blot
Proteins were separated in polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). These membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, followed by secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using a Fusion SOLO.7S.EDGE (Vilber-Lourmat).
qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using Isogen II (Nippongene), and reverse-transcribed using ReverTraAce qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (TOYOBO). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using KOD SYBR qPCR (TOYOBO) and LightCycler 96 (Roche). The sequences of the primers were as follows. 5′-AGCCACCCTTTTCCTACCAG-3′ (mouse Ulk1; sense primer) and 5′-TTCTTGGAGAGTGCTCAGGC-3′ (mouse Ulk1; antisense primer); 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ (mouse Gapdh; sense primer) and 5′-TGTAGACCATGTAGTTGAGGTCA-3′ (mouse Gapdh; antisense primer). Target gene expression was normalized on the basis of GAPDH content.
References
Palm, N. W. & Medzhitov, R. Pattern recognition receptors and control of adaptive immunity. Immunol. Rev. 227, 221–233 (2009).
Takeuchi, O. & Akira, S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140, 805–820 (2010).
Wu, J. & Chen, Z. J. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 461–488 (2014).
Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X. & Chen, Z. J. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786–791 (2013).
Wu, J. et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science 339, 826–830 (2013).
Ishikawa, H. & Barber, G. N. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 455, 674–678 (2008).
Zhong, B. et al. The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation. Immunity 29, 538–550 (2008).
Sun, W. et al. ERIS, an endoplasmic reticulum IFN stimulator, activates innate immune signaling through dimerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8653–8658 (2009).
Jin, L. et al. MPYS, a novel membrane tetraspanner, is associated with major histocompatibility complex class II and mediates transduction of apoptotic signals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5014–5026 (2008).
Zhang, C. et al. Structural basis of STING binding with and phosphorylation by TBK1. Nature 567, 394–398 (2019).
Zhao, B. et al. A conserved PLPLRT/SD motif of STING mediates the recruitment and activation of TBK1. Nature 569, 718–722 (2019).
Tanaka, Y. & Chen, Z. J. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci. Signal. 5, ra20 (2012).
Liu, S. et al. Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation. Science 347, aaa2630 (2015).
Konno, H., Konno, K. & Barber, G. N. Cyclic dinucleotides trigger ULK1 (ATG1) phosphorylation of STING to prevent sustained innate immune signaling. Cell 155, 688–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.049 (2013).
Ogawa, E., Mukai, K., Saito, K., Arai, H. & Taguchi, T. The binding of TBK1 to STING requires exocytic membrane traffic from the ER. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 503, 138–145 (2018).
Gui, X. et al. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 567, 262–266 (2019).
Ran, Y. et al. YIPF5 is essential for innate immunity to DNA virus and facilitates COPII-dependent STING trafficking. J. Immunol. 203, 1560–1570 (2019).
Sun, M. S. et al. TMED2 potentiates cellular IFN responses to DNA viruses by reinforcing MITA dimerization and facilitating its trafficking. Cell Rep. 25, 3086-3098.e3 (2018).
Liu, Y. et al. Activated STING in a vascular and pulmonary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 507–518 (2014).
Jeremiah, N. et al. Inherited STING-activating mutation underlies a familial inflammatory syndrome with lupus-like manifestations. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 5516–5520 (2014).
Watkin, L. B. et al. COPA mutations impair ER-Golgi transport and cause hereditary autoimmune-mediated lung disease and arthritis. Nat. Genet. 47, 654–660 (2015).
Mukai, K. et al. Activation of STING requires palmitoylation at the Golgi. Nat. Commun. 7, 11932 (2016).
Dobbs, N. et al. STING activation by translocation from the ER is associated with infection and autoinflammatory disease. Cell Host Microbe 18, 157–168 (2015).
Deng, Z. et al. A defect in COPI-mediated transport of STING causes immune dysregulation in COPA syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20201045 (2020).
Mukai, K. et al. Homeostatic regulation of STING by retrograde membrane traffic to the ER. Nat. Commun. 12, 61 (2021).
Lepelley, A. et al. Mutations in COPA lead to abnormal trafficking of STING to the Golgi and interferon signaling. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20200600 (2020).
Taguchi, T. & Mukai, K. Innate immunity signalling and membrane trafficking. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 59, 1–7 (2019).
Hansen, A. L. et al. Nitro-fatty acids are formed in response to virus infection and are potent inhibitors of STING palmitoylation and signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E7768–E7775 (2018).
Hansen, A. L., Mukai, K., Schopfer, F. J., Taguchi, T. & Holm, C. K. STING palmitoylation as a therapeutic target. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 16, 236–241 (2019).
Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z. & Barber, G. N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 461, 788–792 (2009).
Lippincott-Schwartz, J. et al. Microtubule-dependent retrograde transport of proteins into the ER in the presence of brefeldin A suggests an ER recycling pathway. Cell 60, 821–836 (1990).
Duran, J. M. et al. Sphingomyelin organization is required for vesicle biogenesis at the Golgi complex. EMBO J. 31, 4535–4546 (2012).
Linder, M. E. & Deschenes, R. J. Palmitoylation: Policing protein stability and traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 74–84 (2007).
Nishimura, T. et al. Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) is required for the perinuclear localization of intra-Golgi v-SNAREs. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3534–3544 (2013).
Pol, A. et al. Cholesterol and fatty acids regulate dynamic caveolin trafficking through the Golgi complex and between the cell surface and lipid bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2091–2105 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Fukuda (Tohoku University) and T. Matsui (Tohoku University) for assistance with ultracentrifugation. We thank T. Kishimoto (Hokkaido University) and K. Tanaka (Hokkaido University) for their input into the experimental design with methyl-β-cyclodextrin. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H00974 (T.T.), JP15H05903 (T.T.), JP17H06164 (H.A.), JP17H06418 (H.A.), JP20H05307 (K.M.), JP20H03202 (K.M.); AMED-PRIME (17939604) (T.T.); JST Center of Innovation program from Japan (JPMJCE1303) (K.M.); The Mitsubishi Foundation (K.M.), the Subsidy for Interdisciplinary Study and Research concerning COVID-19 (Mitsubishi Foundation) (T.T.), Takeda Science Foundation (K.M.), MSD Life Science Foundation (Public Interest Incorporated Foundation) (K.M.), Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science (K.M.), the Research Foundation For Pharmaceutical Sciences (K.M.), Young Investigator Grant (Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University) (K.M.), Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation (K.M.), Grant for Basic Science Research Projects from the Sumitomo Foundation (K.M.), Koyanagi-Foundation (K.M.), and the Nakatomi Foundation (K.M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.T. designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper; T.N. designed the experiments with sphingomyelinase; E.O. and F.K. generated TBK1-KO MEFs; Y.N. and M.S. prepared Tag-free recombinant TBK1. H.A. discussed the results; K.M. and T.T. designed the experiments, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
M.S. is a Chief Scientific Officer of Carna Biosciences, Inc. and owns stocks of Carna Biosciences, Inc. T.T. receives research funding from Carna Biosciences, Inc. All the other authors have no competing/conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, K., Niki, T., Ogawa, E. et al. A cell-free assay implicates a role of sphingomyelin and cholesterol in STING phosphorylation. Sci Rep 11, 11996 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91562-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91562-z
This article is cited by
-
Single-molecule localization microscopy reveals STING clustering at the trans-Golgi network through palmitoylation-dependent accumulation of cholesterol
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Cholesterol-binding motifs in STING that control endoplasmic reticulum retention mediate anti-tumoral activity of cholesterol-lowering compounds
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Activation of human STING by a molecular glue-like compound
Nature Chemical Biology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.