replying to A. W. Fjaeldstad npj Parkinson’s Disease https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00538-5 (2023)
We have read with interest the “Matters Arising” commentary authored by Alexander Wieck Fjaeldstad, in which he comment on certain aspects of our recent article1. First, Dr. Fjaeldstad states that our title, which suggests that congenital anosmia could protect against the development of Parkinson’s disease (PD), does not align with the main hypothesis presented in the article. However, we respectfully disagree with this characterization given that our main hypothesis, as stated in the article, is that the absence of the olfactory bulb (OB) in individuals with isolated congenital anosmia (ICA) may serve as a protective factor against the initiation of PD in the OB. This hypothesis is supported by the proposed role of the OB as an entry point for pathogens or environmental components2. We explicitly state in the article, “Here, we propose a novel hypothesis that individuals with ICA might be immune to PD given the absence of their OB.” It bears emphasizing that not all cases of PD demonstrate a diminished sense of smell, as individuals with atypical parkinsonism, like multiple system atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal syndrome, typically do not display this symptom3. It is likely that the OB is not initially affected in these subtypes. This crucial differentiation is already mentioned in our original text, but merits further accentuation.
Our second hypothesis posits that the discovery of an individual with ICA, born without OB and subsequently developing PD, would contradict the hypothesis that PD onset occurs within the OB. As Dr. Fjaeldstad rightly points out, such a case would falsify the “Dual-Hit” theory, as it would eliminate one of the two proposed entry points4. However, our hypothesis is predicated on the assumption that the “Dual-Hit” theory is incorrect, and do not concern patients with body-first Lewy pathology. We should have stated this more explicitly and appreciate the opportunity to clarify this point. Our research interest is specifically focused on PD patients who display predominant pathology in connected olfactory structures (i.e., brain-first).
Recent findings by Borghammer and colleagues5 have provided compelling evidence that the pathological process of α-synuclein aggregation primarily initiates in the OB or enteric nervous system (ENS) plexuses, as well as the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, rather than simultaneously in the OB and gut. Of interest for our case is the notion that the OB might be an entry point for neurotropic pathogen that leads to α-synuclein pathology in the OB followed by secondary spreading to connected structures, such as the amygdala. It is in this scenario that our black swan would thrive and display a possibility for predominant pathology to connected olfactory structures, without an OB. This would effectively falsify that the entry point via the OB is a necessary condition for this type of pathology.
It is important to note that finding our postulated black swan does not negate all protective effect of ICA against PD. We argue that similar to the protective effect of vagotomy, as highlighted by Dr. Fjaeldstad, the absence of OBs would be beneficial in preventing, or solving PD pathology. For example, in the case of body-first cases, it could eliminate seeding to the OB from within the CNS, and thus slowing down the pathological progression5,6,7. Dr. Fjaeldstad expresses concern that recent case studies, which have uncovered individuals without apparent OB, yet displaying normal olfactory function, may complicate the diagnosis of potential ICA-PD8. However, we are not worried that the existence of such individuals will impede the diagnosis of ICA, as the morphological changes associated with ICA are distinct. For instance, individuals with ICA exhibit two specific abnormalities that both are distinct from the individual identified by Weiss and colleagues8 in that they lack functional olfactory receptors in the olfactory epithelium9, and they show large gray matter differences in the medial orbital gyrus and posterior orbital sulcus10,11. These morphological features are not present in those without OBs yet retaining normal olfactory function. As such, there are several ways to establish an ICA-specific morphological fingerprint for diagnostic purposes. That said, we fully endorse Dr. Fjaeldstad statement that the involvement of a clinician with experience of diagnosing ICA is essential. Dr. Fjaeldstad further suggest that the examination of the potential protective effects of olfactory dysfunction in PD should extend beyond the study of ICA cases. The investigation should also include other, more general forms of olfactory dysfunction, such as syndromic anosmia and anosmia resulting from head trauma. We agree that this expanded approach would be interesting, and improve the overall understanding of the association between olfactory dysfunction and PD. Although olfactory testing is widely available, functional OB assessment has been missing. However, recent technical advancements now allow for non-invasive OB assessment through electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings obtained from electrodes placed on the forehead12. Importantly, this OB functional measurement has been shown to distinguish PD and ICA patients from healthy controls12,13. Longitudinal studies using this approach have the potential to establish early EEG biomarkers that could differentiate between brain-onset and body-onset PD.
Taken together, we believe that a more comprehensive examination of olfactory and OB functions is necessary to advance our understanding of PD pathology and progression.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
No data are associated with this commentary.
Code availability
No code is associated with this commentary.
References
Arshamian, A., Iravani, B. & Lundström, J. N. Is congenital anosmia protective for Parkinson’s disease triggered by pathogenic entrance through the nose? NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 8, 152 (2022).
Rey, N. L., Wesson, D. W. & Brundin, P. The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol. Dis. 109, 226–248 (2018).
Wenning, G. K. et al. Olfactory function in atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Acta Neurol. Scand. 91, 247–250 (1995).
Hawkes, C. H., Del Tredici, K. & Braak, H. Parkinson’s disease: a dual-hit hypothesis. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 33, 599–614 (2007).
Borghammer, P. et al. A postmortem study suggests a revision of the dual-hit hypothesis of Parkinson’s disease. npj Parkinsons Dis. 8, 1–11 (2022).
Van Den Berge, N. et al. Ageing promotes pathological alpha-synuclein propagation and autonomic dysfunction in wild-type rats. Brain 144, 1853–1868 (2021).
Luk, K. C. et al. Intracerebral inoculation of pathological α-synuclein initiates a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative α-synucleinopathy in mice. J. Exp. Med. 209, 975–986 (2012).
Weiss, T. et al. Human olfaction without apparent olfactory bulbs. Neuron 105, 35–45.e5 (2020).
Leopold, D. A., Hornung, D. E. & Schwob, J. E. Congenital lack of olfactory ability. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 101, 229–236 (1992).
Peter, M. G. et al. Morphological changes in secondary, but not primary, sensory cortex in individuals with life-long olfactory sensory deprivation. Neuroimage 218, 117005 (2020).
Peter, M. G. et al. Lifelong olfactory deprivation-dependent cortical reorganization restricted to orbitofrontal cortex. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.25.525521 (2023).
Iravani, B., Arshamian, A., Ohla, K., Wilson, D. A. & Lundstrom, J. N. Non-invasive recording from the human olfactory bulb. Nat. Commun. 11, 648 (2023).
Iravani, B., Arshamian, A., Schaefer, M., Svenningsson, P. & Lundström, J. N. A non-invasive olfactory bulb measure dissociates Parkinson’s patients from healthy controls and discloses disease duration. npj Parkinsons Dis. 7, 1–9 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors received no funding for this project but wish to acknowledge salary support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2018.0153) to J.N.L. and the Swedish Research to A.A. (VR 2021–01311) and B.I. (VR 2021-06645).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the writing and editing of this commentary.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Arshamian, A., Iravani, B. & Lundström, J.N. Reply to Matters Arising: Is congenital anosmia protective for Parkinson’s disease triggered by pathogenic entrance through the nose?. npj Parkinsons Dis. 9, 95 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00539-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00539-4