Abstract
Methylmercury, biomagnifying through food chains, is highly toxic for aquatic life. Its production and degradation are largely driven by microbial transformations; however, diversity and metabolic activity of mercury transformers, resulting in methylmercury concentrations in environments, remain poorly understood. Microbial mats are thick biofilms where oxic and anoxic metabolisms cooccur, providing opportunities to investigate the complexity of the microbial mercury transformations over contrasted redox conditions. Here, we conducted a genome-resolved metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis to identify putative activity of mercury reducers, methylators and demethylators in microbial mats strongly contaminated by mercury. Our transcriptomic results revealed the major role of rare microorganisms in mercury cycling. Mercury methylators, mainly related to Desulfobacterota, expressed a large panel of metabolic activities in sulfur, iron, nitrogen, and halogen compound transformations, extending known activities of mercury methylators under suboxic to anoxic conditions. Methylmercury detoxification processes were dissociated in the microbial mats with methylmercury cleavage being carried out by sulfide-oxidizing Thiotrichaceae and Rhodobacteraceae populations, whereas mercury reducers included members of the Verrucomicrobia, Bacteroidetes, Gammaproteobacteria, and different populations of Rhodobacteraceae. However most of the mercury reduction was potentially carried out anaerobically by sulfur- and iron-reducing Desulfuromonadaceae, revising our understanding of mercury transformers ecophysiology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mercury (Hg) is a toxic and widespread heavy metal of natural and anthropogenic origins that accumulates in soils and sediments1. The methylmercury (MeHg), largely produced from methylation of inorganic mercury by anaerobic microorganisms2, is of special concern since this compound is highly toxic and biomagnifies in aquatic food webs, generating a health hazard to wild animals and humans3. Proteins associated with this metabolic capacity are coded by the gene pair hgcAB, initially detected in Geobacter and Desulfovibrio strains4 and now identified in genomes of few iron reducers, sulfate reducers, and methanogens5. Metagenomic mining and recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of uncultured microbial populations also extended the phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of hgcAB-bearing lineages in various environments6,7,8, suggesting that the list of known methylmercury producers is far from complete. However, the mercury methylation activity of these uncultured lineages remains to be confirmed. Parameters driving hgcAB gene expression remain unknown. The characterization of cultured mercury methylators revealed that the expression of those genes is not inducible by mercury9, and no link have been observed between their expression and the methylation potential10. The expression of hgcA has been proposed to be constitutive but recent metatranscriptomic analysis of environmental samples challenged this hypothesis6. Therefore, further work is required to understand the in situ expression of hgcAB and, ultimately, the toxic methylmercury production.
Microbial activities that directly or indirectly affect Hg(II) methylation or MeHg degradation play a critical role in modulating mercury toxicity11. The prokaryotic mercury resistance mechanism, encoded by the mer operon plays a key role in this paradigm. Within the mer operon, merA gene encodes the mercuric reductase, reducing Hg(II) to gaseous mercury Hg(0)11,12, while merB gene encodes an alkylmercury lyase, cleaving organomercury compounds, including methylmercury13,14. The combinatorial action of merA and merB allows the complete detoxification of a broad spectrum of mercury compounds, providing a major decontamination mechanism for various microbial lineages in mercury contaminated environments. The taxonomic and functional diversity of these microorganisms remains unclear, blurred by numerous horizontal gene transfer events that frequently fractionated the mer operon in microbial genomes, but could be limited to aerobic microorganisms11. Furthermore, although the genetic capabilities of mercury cycling microorganisms have been previously investigated6,7,8, their gene expression profiles in situ remain largely unexplored, leaving their activities in natural habitat poorly understood.
The Etang de Berre in the south of France is the second largest European brackish lagoon covering 155.3 km2. The edge of the lagoon has a strong history of petroleum industry activity, leading locally to hydrocarbon pollutions and regionally to mercury atmospheric deposition. Shallow sediments of the lagoon are colonized by photosynthetic microbial mats. These microbial ecosystems are thick biofilms with a complex structural organization with filamentous cyanobacteria, autotrophic and heterotrophic prokaryotic lineages, protists, fungi, metazoans, and viruses distributed across the thickness and the step gradients of light, oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur compounds, which are characteristic of these biofilms15. Microbial mats play critical roles in many environments as hot spots of biological production, carbon mineralization, organic matter degradation, sediment stabilization, and decontamination of various pollutants including hydrocarbons or heavy metals15,16,17. The multiple environmental niches of these stratified biofilms gather a large variety of aerobic and anaerobic microbial activities, providing opportunities to better understand the complexity of microbial reactions and interactions within geochemical cycles. If environmental drivers of the microbial community structure of these mats have been previously analyzed15, microbial mercury transformations throughout the environmental gradients of the biofilm remain unexplored.
In this study, we applied a genome-resolved metagenomics and metatranscriptomics approach to determine the taxonomy, functional potential, and putative activity of microbial mercury transformers in two microbial mats recovered from the Etang de Berre area, which are strongly contaminated by mercury (17.8 ± 4.1 μg of Hg per gram, Fig. 1) due to atmospheric deposition from neighboring industries and bioaccumulation of mercury by the microbial mats18. A total of 30 metagenomic datasets, covering the spatial and temporal variability of the microbial mats, was generated, leading to 389 GB of sequences, then co-assembled, resulting in the recovery of 407 high- to medium-quality MAGs. Mercury cycling populations were identified and protein sequences of these microbial MAGs were compared to 300 GB of rRNA-depleted metatranscriptomic sequences produced from the same samples. The expression profiles of hgcA, merA, merB genes, and energetical metabolic pathways were investigated at the population level, revealing a larger variety of metabolic activities than usually presumed for mercury cycling microorganisms. This study extends our knowledge on the physiology, the environmental niches, and the involvement in biogeochemical cycling of mercury-transforming microorganisms in coastal sediments.
Results
Geochemistry of the microbial mats
The taxonomic and genetic composition as well as the expression profile of two coastal microbial mats developing in neighboring brackish lagoons, located at Berre l’Etang (EDB) and Salins du Lion (SL) (Fig. 1) were investigated in fine detail. Detailed chemical and physical parameters of both microbial mats during the sampling events have been previously published15,19. As expected, both mats have high sulfate and sulfide concentrations while oxygen concentration and redox potential measurements indicated that both aerobic and anoxic niches likely cooccur in the microbial mats. Presence of alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, coming from the oil industries, is the main environmental feature that distinguishes the two microbial mats (Fig. 1).
Microbial community composition
The microbial community composition was determined using all 16S rRNA genes recovered from the metagenomic datasets (2.1 ± 0.9 × 104 16S rRNA genes per sample; Fig. 2). A discontinuity of the activity in the oil refinery during our 2012 sampling campaign disrupted the microbial diversity of the EDB mat, leading to a divergent microbial community profile (Fig. 2). Excluding these samples, the microbial community composition was relatively similar in both sites (Bray–Curtis similarity index: 71.44%) and stable over the three sampling campaigns. Bacteria strongly predominated the prokaryotic community with on average 98.67 ± 0.48% of the 16S rRNA reads whereas a maximum of 2.02% of the 16S rRNA reads was affiliated to Archaea. Bacteroidetes, representing on average 18.64% of the 16S rRNA reads, Cyanobacteria (8.32%), Alphaproteobacteria (12.53%), including Rhodobacterales order, Desulfobacterota (10.82%) including the Desulfobacterales order and, Gammaproteobacteria (18.10%) were detected as major linages of the microbial mats, representing together up to 68% of the 16S rRNA genes identified in the metagenomes. In addition, members of Chloroflexi (4.26%), Campylobacterales (1.54%), Patescibacteria (3.40%), and Verrucomicrobia phyla (2.52%) were also detected in all samples but in minor proportions (Fig. 2).
Metagenome assembled genomes of the microbial mat and mercury cycling populations
Binning of the contigs obtained after coassembly of all metagenomic reads resulted in the recovery of 407 high- to medium-quality MAGs (completeness > 50%, contamination < 5%). Taxonomic affiliation of these MAGs, inferred from 16S rRNA genes and ribosomal genes phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3) indicated that MAGs from both dominant and rare lineages of the microbial mats were reconstructed. Bacteroidetes (72 MAGs), Cyanobacteria (25 MAGs), Alphaproteobacteria (42 MAGs), Gammaproteobacteria (68 MAGs), Desulfobacterota (26 MAGs), Patescibacteria (19 MAGs), and Verrucomicrobia (14 MAGs) were the most represented phyla (Fig. 2).
Mercury methyltransferase gene hgcA, mercury reductase gene merA, and alkylmercury lyase gene merB were screened in the metagenomic datasets. Up to 45 different hgcA genes (binned and unbinned) were identified in the metagenomic dataset (Fig. 4). Based on taxonomic analysis of hgcA sequences, 82% of these genes were affiliated to the Desulfobacterota phylum. Binning of the contigs recovered 10 MAGs with hgcA gene, representing most of the hgcA gene diversity identified in the samples, with 8 MAGS affiliated to Desulfobacterota (Desulforhopalus, Desulfobulbaceae, Desulfatiglans, and Desulfobacteraceae (Fig. 4). In addition, one MAG was affiliated to Roseimarinus (Bacteroidetes) and another one to the Aminicenantes phyla (Table 1 and Figs. 3 and 4). All of the binned hgcA genes were followed on their contigs by the hgcB gene. Unbinned hgcA sequences without binned references were related to archaeal methanogen (1 sequence), Geobacter (1 sequence), and Desulfovibrio (3 sequences) groups (Fig. 4).
After phylogenetic analysis of the merA genes recovered from the metagenomes, a total of 20 putative merA genes (10 merA and 10 merA-like) were identified, whereas 16 sequences were found to be misannotated by the bioinformatic pipelines (uncharacterized pndr and dld genes in Fig. 5). Furthermore, analysis of the amino acid sequences confirmed the presence of essential cysteines in MerA protein sequences20 whereas these amino acid signatures were not detected in MerA-like protein sequences. Nine of the 10 merA genes and 1 of 10 merA-like genes were found in the recovered MAGs. These MAGs were affiliated to Gammaproteobacteria, Rhodobacteraceae (Alphaproteobacteria), Desulfuromusa (Desulfobacterota), Verrucomicrobiaceae, and Bacteroidetes (Balneolaceae and Rubrivirga) (Table 1). In addition, unbinned merA-like genes without binned close representative were affiliated to Cyanobacteria and Peregrinibacteria (Fig. 5).
Only two merB genes were identified in the metagenomic dataset. These genes were identified in one Thiotrichaceae (Gammaproteobacteria) MAG (bin660) and one Rhodobacteraceae MAG (bin246), but none of these MAGs also included the merA gene (Fig. 5).
Coverage of the MAGs was used as a proxy for the relative abundances of the corresponding populations (Table 1). Overall, the average coverage of the 407 recovered MAGs was 3.5 reads per base in the contig, with a median value of 1.62 and a maximum of 203.12 for a cyanobacterial MAG. Most of the MAGs with hgcA, merA, or merB genes (62.5% of the MAGs) were recovered with a coverage lower than the average coverage (Table 1). Nonetheless, bin805 and bin387 with hgcAB genes, bin785, bin674, bin345, bin55, and bin72 with merA gene, and bin246 with merB gene were recovered with a coverage above the average coverages of all recovered MAGs (Table 1). In addition, coverage of unbinned contigs with hgcAB or merA genes was lower or similar to the binned contigs with coverage <1.5 and 4.5 reads per base for unbinned contigs with hgcAB and merA respectively.
Expression profile of mercury transformation genes
A MAG-centric metatranscriptomic approach was carried out to evaluate expression of mercury transformation genes (hgcA, merA and merB) in the microbial mats (Fig. 6). No mercury cycling gene was found to be expressed in all sampling dates and no clear pattern of expression could be identified between fall and spring periods or day and night, despite the decrease of oxygen concentration and redox potential during the night due to oxygen consumption and reduced photosynthetic activity (Fig. 1).
Transcripts of hgcA genes were detected in both microbial mats (Fig. 6a). Except for the Aminicenantes, expression of hgcA was detected for all populations in at least one sample. hgcA was strongly expressed (number of hgcA transcripts > number of rpob transcripts) by the Desulfatiglans (bin165) population in the EDB samples whereas a strong expression of hgcA by a Desulfobacteraceae (bin762) population was identified in most of the SL samples (Fig. 6a).
Transcripts of merA gene were identified in both EDB and SL microbial mats (Fig. 6b). Transcription of merA was identified for four populations: Gammaproteobacteria bin761, Rhodobacteraceae bin785, Verrucomicrobia bin674, and Desulfuromusa bin93. Only the Desulfuromusa bin93 population expressed merA at higher level than the housekeeping gene rpoB. Finally, although merA gene was detected in Balneolaceae, no merA transcript of Balneolaceae was identified in the metatranscriptomic dataset (Fig. 6b).
Transcription of merB genes was only detected in SL samples. All merB transcripts were assigned to the Thiotrichaeae bin660 and the Rhodobacteraceae bin246 populations (Fig. 6b). When detected, the transcription level of merB gene in bin660 was higher or similar to the expression level of rpoB gene while expression of merB in bin246 was lower or similar to rpoB expression.
Metabolic pathways expressed by mercury cycling populations
Genes expression profile of mercury cycling populations was investigated to determine their putative metabolic activities within the microbial mats (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Data 1). Although the expression profile of each bin depended on its completeness, an average of 2409 ± 1470 genes per bin was found to be expressed over the different seasons and daytime of the study (Table 1).
The Desulfobacterota populations with hgcAB genes expressed numerous metabolic pathways including sulfate (sat, aprAB, dsrABC), tetrathionate (otr), thiosulfate/polysulfide (phs-psrABC), and sulfur reduction (dsrE) genes. Transcription of nitrate, nitrite, and nitric oxide reduction (narG, nrfA, and norQ) and nitrogen fixation genes was also largely detected in Desulfobacterota populations (Fig. 7). Transcripts of iron reduction genes omcA/mtrC were detected in two populations (bin805 and bin387) whereas sulfur oxidation (SQR) and cytochrome C oxidase genes were expressed by the Desulforhopalus (Desulfobulbaceae) bin752 population that also expressed nitrate and nitrite reduction genes. Expression of key enzymes of the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway and subsequent acetate and pyruvate metabolism was also detected for all Desulfobacterota populations. Genes coding hydrogenases and malate, lactate, alcohols, and formate dehydrogenases were also strongly expressed among Desulfobacterota populations. In addition, transcripts of 2-haloacid dehalogenase and trimethylamine-N-oxide reductases (yedYZ and torC) were also detected for half of the Desulfobacterota populations. Hydrocarbon degradation genes (assA, bssA, badA) were expressed in all Desulfobacterota populations recovered from EDB. The Roseimarinus (bin731) population with hgcAB genes expressed genes of tetrathionate/nitrate and nitrite reducing cytochromes (otr, cytochrome c-552, and nrfAH), bacteriochlorophyll synthesis (bhsC), and pyruvate metabolism (Fig. 7). The Aminicenantes (bin506) population with hgcAB genes also expressed nitrate and nitrite reduction genes (napA, otr, and nrfAH) as well as alcohol dehydrogenase and pyruvate metabolism genes. Alkyl succinate synthase gene (assA) involved in hydrocarbon degradation was identified in bin506 but not expressed (Fig. 7).
The microbial populations with merA gene expressed a large variety of metabolic pathways including light utilization for members of the Bacteroidetes, Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, sulfur (DsrE), sulfide (SQR), and thiosulfate oxidation (Sox operon) for the Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, thiosulfate, nitrate (narG), and nitrite (nrfA) reduction for Desulfobacterota. Iron reduction encoding genes (omcA/mtrC, and predicted CXXCH cytochrome) were also expressed by the Desulfobacterota and the Gammaproteobacteria bin761 populations. Gammaproteobacteria bin72, which lacked light utilization genes, expressed the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle, a complex sulfur oxidation pathway (sox, SQR, dsrE, fccA), as well as nitrite reductase and nitrogen fixation genes (nif). Genes coding for nitrate (narG) and arsenate reductases (asrA), hydrogenase, halogen, urea, and ethanolamine utilization were also expressed by a large fraction of the merA-bearing populations (Fig. 7).
For the merB-bearing Thiotrichaeae (Gammaproteobacteria) bin660 population, a strong expression of the Rubisco, cbb-3 type cytochromes, sox operon, and the oxidative-type dsrAB genes was detected. Expression of nitrate reducing genes (narG and otr) and hydrogenases was also observed. The Rhodobacteraceae (Alphaproteobacteria) bin246 population with merB gene strongly expressed light-harvesting complex and photosynthetic reaction center genes (pufLM), nitrate reductase genes (narABG), and the Sox operon. The lower level of transcription was also detected for dehalogenase and arsenate reductase genes (Fig. 7).
Discussion
To better understand the fate and transformations of mercury compounds in coastal environments, the microbial community composition, function, and potential activity of two shallow microbial mats exposed to strong mercury contamination were investigated in detail. The full thickness of the mats was collected, including the oxic and anoxic layers, allowing the simultaneous analysis of both aerobic and anaerobic lineages and metabolisms. Additionally, sampling was carried out at different seasons to account for temporal variability. At the genus level, the microbial community composition was similar in both EDB and SL microbial mats (Fig. 2, Bray–Curtis similarity index: 71.44%), and aligned with microbial mat communities identified in other marine and brackish ecosystems16,21,22, allowing our results to be reasonably extended to similar environmental contexts.
To evaluate mercury methylation in the microbial mats, hgcA genes and transcripts were investigated. The frequency of hgcA genes identified in the metagenomic dataset (Fig. 4) was similar to previous reports on marine polluted sediments23, indicating a strong potential for methylation of mercury in microbial mats. All hgcA genes identified in genomic bins were followed by hgcB gene in the contigs, supporting the metabolic potential for mercury methylation24. Mercury methylation genes were identified in genome of populations related to Roseimarinus (Bacteroidetes) and the uncultivated phyla of Aminicenantes, supporting previous metagenomic mining in marine environments7. However, phylogenetic analysis of hgcA gene and transcripts as well as taxonomy of the hgcAB-bearing MAGs indicated that members of the Desulfobacterota represented most of the mercury methylator diversity in these coastal microbial mats (Figs. 4 and 6a), which is consistent with the sulfate and sulfide rich conditions of the mats (Fig. 1). Desulfobacteraceae bin387 and bin805 populations were recovered with high coverages (>4 reads per base; Table 1), suggesting that these populations are quantitatively important members of the microbial mats. However, the large majority of the hgcA transcripts were related to less abundant hydrocarbon degrading Desulfatiglans bin165 population in the Etang de Berre mat and a different Desulfobacteraceae population (bin762) in Salins du Lion. These results suggest that although various populations have the potential to methylate mercury, only few populations expressed the genes, supporting similar observation in thawed permafrost ecosystem6 and that most of the mercury methylation activity might be carried out by minority to rare members of the microbial community, challenging correlation analyses between methylmercury concentration and relative abundance of potential mercury methylators. This finding also supports previous examples for microorganisms, and more particularly Desulfobacterota members, of numerical low abundance that can have an impact on ecosystem functioning25.
A large variety of metabolic pathways were expressed by mercury methylators, spanning several biogeochemical cycles and extending known ecological functions of these microorganisms (Fig. 7). These metabolic activities are probably not attributable to a single bacterium but distributed between the different members of each population, with each member exploiting different environmental microniches. As expected from previous results based on samples of similar environmental conditions, the dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway was one of the most expressed energetical pathway in mercury methylator populations2,26,27,28. However, we also detected transcripts of tetrathionate and thiosulfate/polysulfide reductases in 60% of Desulfobacteraceae populations, suggesting that part of the mercury methylators might gain energy from additional sulfur sources. Interestingly, transcripts of cytochrome c oxidase and sulfide quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) enzymes were identified in the Desulfobulbaceae population, supporting a sulfide/sulfur oxidation metabolism, potentially coupled to nitrate reduction through the expression of narG gene, as previously proposed29. This result suggests that mercury methylation might not be limited to low redox and anaerobic conditions, but could also be carried out in oxic to suboxic conditions by some Desulfobulbaceae populations, potentially extending the distribution of environmental niches prone to methylmercury production.
Transcripts analysis revealed a major involvement of mercury methylators in nitrogen cycling with expression of nitrate reduction and/or denitrification genes for all recovered populations (Fig. 7), as previously proposed30,31. Expression of genes involved in iron, halogenated and methylated compounds utilization and various fermentation was also detected, suggesting that some methylmercury producers might thrive on numerous additional metabolism than previously suspected. In addition, genes associated with syntrophic metabolism (hydrogenases, formate dehydrogenases)32 were also expressed by Desulfobacterota populations, supporting a potential role of syntrophic interactions in mercury methylation33. Together these results expanded the environmental niches and the known metabolic flexibility of mercury methylators.
As toxic methylmercury and mercury accumulation might be mitigated by demethylation and reduction, through the activity of organomercury lyase (MerB) and mercury reductase (MerA) enzymes respectively11, diversity of merB and merA genes were also assessed. Based on merA genes phylogeny and taxonomy and coverage of the MAGs, the diversity (number of different lineages) and relative abundance (average coverage) of mercury reducers were larger than those of mercury methylators (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Mercury reducers detected in the microbial mats included known lineages of mercury reducers such as members of the Gammaproteobacteria, Rhodobacteraceae, and Bacteroidetes11. Rhodobacteraceae and Bacteroidetes populations were identified as dominant members of the microbial mats (Fig. 2) but no or very little expression of merA was detected for these lineages (Fig. 6). Most of the merA transcripts were assigned to Gammaproteobacteria (bin761) and Desulfuromusa (bin93) populations with low coverage (Table 1), suggesting that mercury detoxification activity of abundant microorganisms might be lower than those of rare lineages.
Genetic composition and expression profile of the Desulfuromusa bin93 population (Fig. 7) was consistent with the strict anaerobic metabolism of the Desulfuromonadales members34, suggesting that although merA is generally identified in aerobic lineages35,36, most of the mercury reduction might be carried out by anaerobic lineages in the anoxic layers of microbial mats and sediments. This results suggest a potential cycle of mercury methylation, demethylation, and reduction in anoxic part of the microbial mat, as previously suspected in other anoxic environments36. Interestingly, merA gene was also identified in three Verrucomicrobiaceae populations with the genetic composition and the expression profile consistent with an anaerobic metabolism based on fermentation (Fig. 7). The merA gene of these populations branched at the base of the phylogenetic tree without known references but in proximity with Desulfuromonadales sequences (Fig. 5), indicating that these Verrucomicrobiaceae populations may represent a new group of mercury reducers under anoxic conditions. Expression of merA gene was detected for one of the Verrucomicrobiaceae population (Fig. 6), supporting their role in mercury detoxification. Together, detected activities of mercury reducer populations were diverse, spanning sulfur, nitrogen and iron cycles and phototrophic, autotrophic and heterotrophic lifestyles, indicating a large metabolic flexibility in aerobic and anaerobic mercury detoxifying populations.
None of the recovered MAG with merA gene also included the organomercury lyase gene (merB). However, merB gene was identified in two MAGs with high completeness (96.89%), detected exclusively in the Salins du Lion mats, and affiliated to members of the Rhodobacteraceae and Thiotrichaceae with sulfur-oxidizing activity. Although this might be due to the incompleteness of our MAGs, this result is consistent with the low frequency of merA and merB gene cooccurrence in public microbial genomes11. Furthermore, mining of the available genomes in IMG database for merA and merB genes highlighted that over the 4530 genomes with merB gene, only 34% (1545) also include merA, supporting the occurrence of merB alone in our MAGs and recent observations20. Both Rhodobacteraceae and Thiotrichaceae populations were found to express merB (Fig. 6), indicating an active methylmercury detoxification process in SL microbial mat. Together our results suggest that methylmercury cleavage and mercury reduction were dissociated in the microbial mats, with each reaction being carried out by taxonomically different lineages. The accumulation of mercury is detrimental for the cells, therefore additional merA-independent mechanism for mercury export or detoxification should occur in these populations. Various biotic and abiotic merA-independent detoxification process have been proposed20,37, with notably the reduction of HgII to Hg0 in photomixotrophic microorganisms, providing a plausible mechanism of mercury detoxification for the Rhodobacteraceae bin246 population that strongly expressed phototrophic and mixotrophic genes.
The presence of a long-term hydrocarbon contamination in Etang de Berre is the main environmental feature that distinguishes the two habitats sampled in this study15 (Fig. 1). Our 16S rRNA gene analysis indicated that the microbial community composition at the genus level was similar in the two habitats. However, the genome centric approach indicated that up to 162 different populations (40% of the MAGs, Fig. 3) were recovered from only one habitat, suggesting a modification of the microbial community composition at the population level rather than at the genus level. Consistent with the alkane and PAH contamination in Etang de Berre, all MAGs with the potential for mercury methylation identified in this mat (bin165, bin506, bin727, bin805) were found to encode and express anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes (Benzoyl-CoA reductase or Aryl/benzylsuccinate synthase, annotated 88 and 89 in Fig. 7) except for the Aminicentantes bin506 for which no transcripts were identified (Fig. 7). By contrast, none of the MAGs from Salins du Lion encoded such genes. This result might indicate that hydrocarbon could structure the mercury methylator community by selecting lineages with hydrocarbon degrading metabolism. Although additional experiments are required, the absence of methylmercury degraders in EDB could also be a consequence of the hydrocarbon pollution in this habitat. By affecting both methylmercury producer and degrader diversity, the presence of hydrocarbons might have critical consequences for the methylmercury fate in hydrocarbons polluted environments.
The microbial mats analyzed in detail in this study provided an outstanding opportunity to investigate microbial populations controlling mercury toxicity at the foundation of the food chain. Our genetic and transcriptomic characterization of involved microbial populations extended the taxonomic and functional diversity of mercury cycle lineages, and emphasize the major roles of minority and rare mercury transformers in sulfur but also carbon, nitrogen, and iron biogeochemical cycles. The simultaneous detection of genes and transcripts of both mercury methylation and detoxification pathways indicated that mercury transformations are entangled in brackish biofilms, with potential cycles of methylation and demethylation under both anoxic and suboxic conditions.
Methods
Sample collection and nucleic acid extraction
Two coastal microbial mats developing in neighboring brackish lagoons, located at Berre l’Etang (EDB) and Salins du Lion (SL), a bird reserve located 5 km away from EDB were investigated (Fig. 1). Physical (temperature, pH, salinity, irradiance) and chemical (hydrocarbon content, metal, sulfate, H2S, dissolved oxygen, total and organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations, redox potential) parameters have been previously published for both microbial mats and underlying sediments19. Sediments under both microbial mats are strongly contaminated by heavy metals, with mercury concentration averaging to 17.8 ± 4.1 μg of Hg per gram19. The major environmental parameter that distinguishes the two microbial mats is the presence of hydrocarbons, including alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, caused by oil refinery contaminated rainwaters discharges in EDB15. Microbial mat samples were collected in triplicate in September 2011, April 2012, and September 2012. In September and April 2012 microbial mats were sampled during both daytime (4 PM) and night-time (4 AM), leading to a total of 30 microbial mat samples. Samples were stored in cryotubes and immediately submerged in liquid nitrogen for fast-freezing. Back in laboratory, samples were stored at −80 °C until nucleic acids extraction. Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) were extracted from all samples using the RNA PowerSoilTM Total RNA Isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) coupled with the Allprep DNA/RNA mini kit and the RNaseFree DNase Set (Qiagen). RNA quality was checked using RNA nanochip on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and absence of DNA contamination within RNA samples was confirmed by PCR amplification using RNA as a template. mRNA were enriched using Ribo-Zero™ Magnetic Kit (Bacteria), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA was then immediately converted to cDNA using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase and RNase OUTTM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 1 µl of purified mRNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Metagenomic library preparation, sequencing, and analysis
Metagenomes were constructed for all 30 samples using the BioScientific PCR-free kit following the manufacturer’s protocol while metatranscriptomes of each sample were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Metagenomes and metatranscriptomes were sequenced using Illumina HiSeq (2 × 100 bp) platform at the Genotoul sequencing facility leading to a total 670 Gb of sequences (370 GB of metagenomes and 300 GB of rRNA-depleted metatranscriptomes). Datasets were quality filtered using the Trimmomatic v.0.39 tool38, keeping both R1 and R2 reads when reads overlapped. The 16S rRNA reads were isolated from the metagenomic reads using REAGO 1.1 (ref. 39), and taxonomic assignments were performed with Mothur40 using RDP classifier (cut-off: 80) against Silva database release 138 as reference41. Since metagenomic 16S rRNA reads were only 100 bp long and spanned various regions of the 16S rRNA gene, taxonomic assignments were limited to the genus level and above.
Binning and functional characterization
For MAGs reconstruction, all quality filtered sequences were pooled and co-assembled using MEGAHIT42, then coassembly was uploaded to IMG/MER platform for gene annotation43. Read coverage of the contigs was carried out using bwa-mem (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net), followed by the binning of the contigs longer than 2000 bp by MetaBAT-2 (ref. 44). The completeness and contamination level of the MAGs were then evaluated using CheckM45. Only MAGs with a contamination level under 5% and completeness above 50% were analyzed. Open reading frames (ORFs) were identified using Prodigal46 and compared against COG, Pfam, TIGRfam, and KEGG databases on IMG/MER platform, leading to 5.7 × 106 genes with product name (58.96% of the genes). Since hgcA gene is poorly characterized on large public databases, we identified hgcA genes in the dataset using the publicly available hgcA hidden markov model profile and metabolisHMM47. In addition, all contigs with hgcA were manually inspected to detect the presence of the hgcB gene downstream of hgcA. For the merA and merB genes identification, erroneous annotations were identified in the KEGG database. Therefore, merA and merB were also identified separately with metabolisHMM using KOFAM K00520 for merA and a homemade hidden markov model of merB genes, filtered with an e-value threshold of e−120. To validate gene identifications, recovered amino acid sequences of hgcA, merA, and merB genes were aligned with reference sequences downloaded from NCBI using Clustal Omega48 and amino acid phylogenetic trees were generated using Fasttree 2 (ref. 49). Phylogenetic trees were visualized using iTol v.4 (ref. 50). When the gene sequence was complete, recovered MerA sequences were manually examined for the presence of cysteine pairs that are potentially essential for MerA activity20. In the absence of the amino acid signature the gene were defined as “merA-like”. Likewise, the presence of conserved amino acid signatures identified in functional MerB proteins51, including cysteines at position 96, 159, and 117 and aspartic acid at position 99, was also verified in recovered MerB sequences.
Expression profile analysis
To determine gene expression levels of each gene identified in MAGs, all metatranscriptomic reads passing quality filtration were mapped against all open reading frames identified in MAGs using bwa-mem. Due to rRNA depletion step malfunction, the September 2012 metatranscriptomes of EDB microbial mats were removed from the analysis. For each MAGs, the coverage value of genes of interest was normalized to the coverage of the RNA polymerase subunit B (rpoB) gene to discriminate between low and high expression level compared to housekeeping genes. Results were represented in heatmaps using the software environment R (v.4.0.3) and R Studio (v.1.3.1093).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Assembled metagenome data are available in IMG/MR (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/mer/) under the following accession numbers: 3300040774–3300040799. Coassembly is also available on IMG/MR under accession number 3300040801. Bins with mercury cycling genes were deposited in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15015303v2). Environmental metadata were previously published15. Nucleotide sequences are available in the NCBI Genbank database under Bioproject accession number SRP063590.
Code availability
The merB gene HMM profile is available in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15015303.v2). Software version: REAGO 1.1, Mothur 1.44.3, Trimmomatic v0.39, Megahit 1.2.9, bwa 0.7.17, CheckM v.1.1.2, R 4.0.3 and R Studio 1.3.1093.
References
Wood, J. M. Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment. Science 183, 1049 (1974).
Ma, M., Du, H. & Wang, D. Mercury methylation by anaerobic microorganisms: a review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1893–1936 (2019).
Hammerschmidt, C. R. & Fitzgerald, W. F. Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 7764–7770 (2006).
Parks, J. M. et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 339, 1332 (2013).
Gilmour, C. C. et al. Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11810–11820 (2013).
McDaniel, E. A. et al. Expanded phylogenetic diversity and metabolic flexibility of mercury-methylating microorganisms. mSystems 5, e00299–20 (2020).
Lin, H. et al. Mercury methylation by metabolically versatile and cosmopolitan marine bacteria. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00889-4 (2021).
Gionfriddo, C. M. et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics and detailed geochemical speciation analyses yield new insights into microbial mercury cycling in geothermal springs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e00176–20 (2020).
Goñi-Urriza, M. et al. Relationships between bacterial energetic metabolism, mercury methylation potential, and hgcA/hgcB gene expression in Desulfovibrio dechloroacetivorans BerOc1. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 13764–13771 (2015).
Christensen, G. A. et al. Determining the reliability of measuring mercury cycling gene abundance with correlations with mercury and methylmercury concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8649–8663 (2019).
Boyd, E. & Barkay, T. The mercury resistance operon: from an origin in a geothermal environment to an efficient detoxification machine. Front. Microbiol. 3, 349 (2012).
Osborn, A. M., Bruce, K. D., Strike, P. & Ritchie, D. A. Distribution, diversity and evolution of the bacterial mercury resistance (mer) operon. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 239–262 (1997).
Schaefer, J. K. et al. Role of the bacterial organomercury lyase (MerB) in controlling methylmercury accumulation in mercury-contaminated natural waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 4304–4311 (2004).
Barkay, T., Miller, S. M. & Summers, A. O. Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 355–384 (2003).
Aubé, J. et al. Meta-omics provides insights into the impact of hydrocarbon contamination on microbial mat functioning. Microb. Ecol. 80, 286–295 (2020).
Stal, L. J., Bolhuis, H. & Cretoiu, M. S. in Modern Topics in the Phototrophic Prokaryotes: Environmental and Applied Aspects (ed. Hallenbeck, P. C.) 295–318 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Vigneron, A. et al. Multiple strategies for light-harvesting, photoprotection, and carbon flow in high latitude microbial mats. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2881 (2018).
Dranguet, P., Le Faucheur, S. & Slaveykova, V. I. Mercury bioavailability, transformations, and effects on freshwater biofilms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 36, 3194–3205 (2017).
Aubé, J. et al. The impact of long-term hydrocarbon exposure on the structure, activity, and biogeochemical functioning of microbial mats. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 111, 115–125 (2016).
Christakis, C. A., Barkay, T. & Boyd, E. S. Expanded diversity and phylogeny of mer genes broadens mercury resistance paradigms and reveals an origin for MerA among thermophilic Archaea. Front. Microbiol. 12, 1645 (2021).
Bolhuis, H. & Stal, L. J. Analysis of bacterial and archaeal diversity in coastal microbial mats using massive parallel 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing. ISME J. 5, 1701–1712 (2011).
Kirk Harris, J. et al. Phylogenetic stratigraphy in the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. ISME J. 7, 50–60 (2013).
Podar, M. et al. Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500675 (2015).
Smith Steven, D. et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of HgcA and HgcB reveals amino acid residues important for mercury methylation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 3205–3217 (2015).
Pester, M., Bittner, N., Deevong, P., Wagner, M. & Loy, A. A ‘rare biosphere’ microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland. ISME J. 4, 1591–1602 (2010).
Zeng, L., Luo, G., He, T., Guo, Y. & Qian, X. Effects of sulfate-reducing bacteria on methylmercury at the sediment–water interface. J. Environ. Sci. 46, 214–219 (2016).
Compeau, G. C. & Bartha, R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 50, 498 (1985).
Azaroff, A. et al. Marine mercury-methylating microbial communities from coastal to Capbreton Canyon sediments (North Atlantic Ocean). Environ. Pollut. 262, 114333 (2020).
Müller, H., Marozava, S., Probst, A. J. & Meckenstock, R. U. Groundwater cable bacteria conserve energy by sulfur disproportionation. ISME J. 14, 623–634 (2020).
Todorova, S. G. et al. Evidence for regulation of monomethyl mercury by nitrate in a seasonally stratified, eutrophic lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6572–6578 (2009).
Kerin, E. J. et al. Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7919 (2006).
Worm, P. et al. A genomic view on syntrophic versus non-syntrophic lifestyle in anaerobic fatty acid degrading communities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 2004–2016 (2014).
Yu, R.-Q., Reinfelder, J. R., Hines, M. E. & Barkay, T. Syntrophic pathways for microbial mercury methylation. ISME J. 12, 1826–1835 (2018).
Widdel, F. & Pfennig, N. in The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria: Ecophysiology, Isolation, Identification, Applications (eds. Balows, A. et al.) 3379–3389 (Springer New York, 1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2191-1_22.
Barkay, T., Kritee, K., Boyd, E. & Geesey, G. A thermophilic bacterial origin and subsequent constraints by redox, light and salinity on the evolution of the microbial mercuric reductase. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 2904–2917 (2010).
Lu, X. et al. Anaerobic mercury methylation and demethylation by Geobacter bemidjiensis Bem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 4366–4373 (2016).
Grégoire, D. S. & Poulain, A. J. A physiological role for HgII during phototrophic growth. Nat. Geosci. 9, 121–125 (2016).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Yuan, C., Lei, J., Cole, J. & Sun, Y. Reconstructing 16S rRNA genes in metagenomic data. Bioinformatics 31, i35–i43 (2015).
Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).
Pruesse, E. et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 7188–7196 (2007).
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 (2015).
Markowitz, V. M. et al. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 25, 2271–2278 (2009).
Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010).
McDaniel, E. A., Anantharaman, K. & McMahon, K. D. MetabolisHMM: phylogenomic analysis for exploration of microbial phylogenies and metabolic pathways. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.20.884627v1 (2019).
Sievers, F. & Higgins, D. G. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci. 27, 135–145 (2018).
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W256–W259 (2019).
Lafrance-Vanasse, J., Lefebvre, M., Di Lello, P., Sygusch, J. & Omichinski, J. G. Crystal structures of the organomercurial lyase MerB in its free and mercury-bound forms: insights into the mechanism of methylmercury degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 938–944 (2009).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the French National Research Agency [ANR FUNHYMAT ANR11 BSV7 014 01] and by the Excellence Initiative of Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour – I-Site E2S UPPA [Hub MeSMic], a French “Investissements d’Avenir” program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.G. and M.G. design the study, J.A. and M.G. collected the samples. J.A. generated the dataset. A.V. and P.C. analyzed the data and A.V. wrote the manuscript with contributions from P.C., J.A., R.G., and M.G.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Vigneron, A., Cruaud, P., Aubé, J. et al. Transcriptomic evidence for versatile metabolic activities of mercury cycling microorganisms in brackish microbial mats. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-021-00255-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-021-00255-y
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.