Abstract
Understanding the causes of the arrest of species distributions has been a fundamental question in ecology and evolution. These questions are of particular interest for trees owing to their long lifespan and sessile nature. A surge in data availability evokes a macro-ecological analysis to determine the underlying forces limiting distributions. Here we analyse the spatial distribution of >3,600 major tree species to determine geographical areas of range-edge hotspots and find drivers for their arrest. We confirmed biome edges to be strong delineators of distributions. Importantly, we identified a stronger contribution of temperate than tropical biomes to range edges, adding strength to the notion that tropical areas are centres of radiation. We subsequently identified a strong association of range-edge hotspots with steep spatial climatic gradients. We linked spatial and temporal homogeneity and high potential evapotranspiration in the tropics as the strongest predictors of this phenomenon. We propose that the poleward migration of species in light of climate change might be hindered because of steep climatic gradients.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The occurrence points used from GBIF can be found on the GBIF webpage (https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.ajen6k). Polygons generated from occurrence points are provided in the public Zenodo repository 10.5281/zenodo.7613535. Biome polygons were obtained from the WWF webpage (http://www.worldwildlife.org/). Bioclimatic attributes were downloaded from WorldClim Global Climate Data58. ENVIREM variables were downloaded from their webpage (https://envirem.github.io/).
Code availability
Custom codes related to this paper can be found in a GitHub repository at https://github.com/dlernerg/Global-Range-edges
References
Soule, M. The epistasis cycle: a theory of marginal populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 165–187 (1973).
Brown, J. H. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124, 255–279 (1984).
Gaston, K. J. The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
Sexton, J. P., McIntyre, P. J., Angert, A. L. & Rice, K. J. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 415–436 (2009).
Gaston, K. J. Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1395–1406 (2009).
Zizka, A. et al. No one-size-fits-all solution to clean GBIF. PeerJ 8, e9916 (2020).
Goldberg, E. E. & Lande, R. Species’ borders and dispersal barriers. Am. Nat. 170, 297–304 (2007).
Bachmann, J. C., Rensburg, A. J. V., Cortazar-Chinarro, M., Laurila, A. & Buskirk, J. V. Gene flow limits adaptation along steep environmental gradients. Am. Nat. 195, E67–E86 (2020).
Hargreaves, A. L., Samis, K. E. & Eckert, C. G. Are species’ range limits simply niche limits writ large? A review of transplant experiments beyond the range. Am. Nat. 183, 157–173 (2014).
Henry, R. C., Bartoń, K. A. & Travis, J. M. J. Mutation accumulation and the formation of range limits. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140871 (2015).
Perrier, A., Sánchez-Castro, D. & Willi, Y. Environment dependence of the expression of mutational load and species’ range limits. J. Evol. Biol. 35, 731–741 (2022).
Bontrager, M. et al. Adaptation across geographic ranges is consistent with strong selection in marginal climates and legacies of range expansion. Evolution 75, 1316–1333 (2021).
Santini, L., Pironon, S., Maiorano, L. & Thuiller, W. Addressing common pitfalls does not provide more support to geographical and ecological abundant-centre hypotheses. Ecography 42, 696–705 (2019).
Oldfather, M. F., Kling, M. M., Sheth, S. N., Emery, N. C. & Ackerly, D. D. Range edges in heterogeneous landscapes: integrating geographic scale and climate complexity into range dynamics. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 1055–1067 (2020).
Janzen, D. H. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am. Nat. 101, 233–249 (1967).
Maxwell, M. F., Leprieur, F., Quimbayo, J. P., Floeter, S. R. & Bender, M. G. Global patterns and drivers of beta diversity facets of reef fish faunas. J. Biogeogr. 49, 954–967 (2022).
Roy, K., Hunt, G., Jablonski, D., Krug, A. Z. & Valentine, J. W. A macroevolutionary perspective on species range limits. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1485–1493 (2009).
Loiseau, N. et al. Global distribution and conservation status of ecologically rare mammal and bird species. Nat. Commun. 11, 5071 (2020).
Kerkhoff, A. J., Moriarty, P. E. & Weiser, M. D. The latitudinal species richness gradient in New World woody angiosperms is consistent with the tropical conservatism hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8125–8130 (2014).
Donoghue, M. J. & Edwards, E. J. Biome shifts and niche evolution in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 547–572 (2014).
Ringelberg, J. J., Zimmermann, N. E., Weeks, A., Lavin, M. & Hughes, C. E. Biomes as evolutionary arenas: convergence and conservatism in the trans-continental succulent biome. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1100–1113 (2020).
Smith, J. R. et al. A global test of ecoregions. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1889–1896 (2018).
Paquette, A. & Messier, C. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 170–180 (2011).
Pichancourt, J. B., Firn, J., Chadès, I. & Martin, T. G. Growing biodiverse carbon-rich forests. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 382–393 (2014).
Pennington, R. T., Lavin, M. & Oliveira-Filho, A. Woody plant diversity, evolution, and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 437–457 (2009).
Zhu, K., Woodall, C. W. & Clark, J. S. Failure to migrate: lack of tree range expansion in response to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 1042–1052 (2012).
Corlett, R. T. & Westcott, D. A. Will plant movements keep up with climate change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 482–488 (2013).
la Sorte, F. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Jetz, W. & Böhning-Gaese, K. Range-wide latitudinal and elevational temperature gradients for the world’s terrestrial birds: implications under global climate change. PLoS One 9, e98361 (2014).
Title, P. O. & Bemmels, J. B. ENVIREM: an expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography 41, 291–307 (2018).
Veresoglou, S. D. & Peñuelas, J. Variance in biomass-allocation fractions is explained by distribution in European trees. New Phytol. 222, 1352–1363 (2019).
Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).
Holdridge, L. R. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105, 367–368 (1947).
Whittaker, R. H. Classification of natural communities. Bot. Rev. 28, 1–239 (1962).
McDonald, R. et al. Species compositional similarity and ecoregions: do ecoregion boundaries represent zones of high species turnover? Biol. Conserv. 126, 24–40 (2005).
von Humboldt, A. & Bonpland, A. Essay on the Geography of Plants (Univ. Chicago Press, 2013).
Cardillo, M. Latitude and rates of diversifcation in birds and butterfies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1221–1225 (1999).
Hillebrand, H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).
Mittelbach, G. G. et al. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett. 10, 315–331 (2007).
Hewitt, G. M. Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 183–195 (2004).
Crane, P. & Scott, L. Angiosperm diversification and paleolatitudinal gradients in Cretaceous floristic diversity. Science 246, 675–678 (1989).
Jablonski, D. The tropics as a source of evolutionary novelty through geological time. Nature 364, 142–144 (1993).
Jablonski, D. et al. Out of the tropics, but how? Fossils, bridge species, and thermal ranges in the dynamics of the marine latitudinal diversity gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10487–10494 (2013).
Antonelli, A. et al. An engine for global plant diversity: highest evolutionary turnover and emigration in the American tropics. Front. Genet. 6, 130 (2015).
Jump, A. S. & Peñuelas, J. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020 (2005).
Morreale, L. L., Thompson, J. R., Tang, X., Reinmann, A. B. & Hutyra, L. R. Elevated growth and biomass along temperate forest edges. Nat. Commun. 12, 7181 (2021).
Wilkinson, S., Clephan, A. L. & Davies, W. J. Rapid low temperature-induced stomatal closure occurs in cold-tolerant Commelina communis but not in cold-sensitive tobacco leaves, via a mechanism that involves apoplastic calcium but not abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 126, 1566–1578 (2001).
Brodribb, T. J. & Holbrook, N. M. Stomatal protection against hydraulic failure: a comparison of coexisting ferns and angiosperms. New Phytol. 162, 663–670 (2004).
Davis, B. A. S. & Brewer, S. Orbital forcing and role of the latitudinal insolation/temperature gradient. Clim. Dyn. 32, 143–165 (2009).
Seager, R. et al. Strengthening tropical Pacific zonal sea surface temperature gradient consistent with rising greenhouse gases. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 517–522 (2019).
Xu, Y. & Ramanathan, V. Latitudinally asymmetric response of global surface temperature: implications for regional climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L13706 (2012).
Colwell, R. K., Brehm, G., Cardelús, C. L., Gilman, A. C. & Longino, J. T. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322, 258–261 (2008).
Basso, B., Martinez-Feria, R. A., Rill, L. & Ritchie, J. T. Contrasting long-term temperature trends reveal minor changes in projected potential evapotranspiration in the US Midwest. Nat. Commun. 12, 1476 (2021).
Zizka, A. et al. CoordinateCleaner: standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 744–751 (2019).
Serra-Diaz, J. M., Enquist, B. J., Maitner, B., Merow, C. & Svenning, J. Big data of tree species distributions: how big and how good? For. Ecosyst. 4, 30 (2017).
Getis, A. & Ord, J. K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr. Anal. 24, 189–206 (1992).
Mendez, C. Spatial autocorrelation analysis in R. R Studio/RPubs. https://rpubs.com/quarcs-lab/spatial-autocorrelation (2020).
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. & Gómez-Rubio, V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R (Springer, 2013).
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Heath, J. P. Quantifying temporal variability in population abundances. Oikos 115, 573–581 (2006).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. The consecutive disparity index, D: a measure of temporal variability in ecological studies. Ecosphere 9, e02527 (2018).
Bartoń, K. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package v.1.10.1. (2013).
F. Dormann, C. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30, 609–628 (2007).
Acknowledgements
T.K. thanks the Edith and Nathan Goldenberg Career Development Chair; Mary and Tom Beck-Canadian Center for Alternative Energy Research; Larson Charitable Foundation New Scientist Fund; Yotam Project; Dana and Yossie Hollander; the Estate of Emile Mimran; and the Estate of Helen Nichunsky. D.L. was supported by the Sustainability and Energy Research Initiative PhD grant. M.F.M. and J.P. were supported by grants PID2019-110521GB-I00 and TED2021-132627B-I00 funded by Spain, Ministry for Science and Innovation (MCIN), AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the NextGeneration EU/PRTR (Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan). M.F.M. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from ‘la Caixa’ Foundation (ID 100010434), code: LCF/BQ/PI21/11830010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.L., J.B. and T.K. designed the research. D.L. performed the research and analysed the data. M.F.M., J.P., T.K., J.B. and S.L.-L. provided scientific advice. M.F.M. and J.B. advised on statistical aspects. D.L. wrote the paper with special contributions from J.P., J.B., M.F.M. and T.K.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Plants thanks Giacomo Puglielli and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Methods and Figs. 1–10.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lerner, D., Martínez, M.F., Livne-Luzon, S. et al. A biome-dependent distribution gradient of tree species range edges is strongly dictated by climate spatial heterogeneity. Nat. Plants 9, 544–553 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01369-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01369-1