Abstract
Reconstructive phase transitions involving breaking and reconstruction of primary chemical bonds are ubiquitous and important for many technological applications. In contrast to displacive phase transitions, the dynamics of reconstructive phase transitions are usually slow due to the large energy barrier. Nevertheless, the reconstructive phase transformation from β- to λ-Ti3O5 exhibits an ultrafast and reversible behavior. Despite extensive studies, the underlying microscopic mechanism remains unclear. Here, we discover a kinetically favorable in-plane nucleated layer-by-layer transformation mechanism through metadynamics and large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. This is enabled by developing an efficient machine learning potential with near first-principles accuracy through an on-the-fly active learning method and an advanced sampling technique. Our results reveal that the β−λ phase transformation initiates with the formation of two-dimensional nuclei in the ab-plane and then proceeds layer-by-layer through a multistep barrier-lowering kinetic process via intermediate metastable phases. Our work not only provides important insight into the ultrafast and reversible nature of the β−λ transition, but also presents useful strategies and methods for tackling other complex structural phase transitions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solid–solid phase transitions are arguably one of the most ubiquitous phenomena in nature and have important implications for numerous scientific areas such as metallurgy1, ceramics2,3, diamond production4,5, earth sciences6,7, and so on. Typically, the solid-solid phase transitions can be categorized into two main classes. One is the displacive (martensitic) type, where the atomic configuration evolves with short-range shifts of atoms, and no chemical bonds are broken. The other one is the reconstructive type which involves breaking and reconstruction of part of the chemical bonds and exhibits drastic changes at the transition point with large latent heat and thermal hysteresis8. In contrast to the displacive phase transitions, the dynamics of the reconstructive phase transitions are usually slow because of the need to overcome a large free-energy barrier9,10,11,12. This raises an important question of whether it is possible to obtain ultrafast dynamics in a reconstructive phase transition, which is highly desirable for designing novel functional devices with fast responses to external stimuli. Interestingly, the isostructural phase reconstruction from the low-temperature semiconducting β-Ti3O5 phase to the high-temperature metallic λ-Ti3O5 phase observed in recent experiments is one representative example meeting such a condition13,14,15,16,17. The transition is of first order with a large latent heat and exhibits abnormal ultrafast and reversible characteristics13,14,15,16,17. The reversibility can be achieved by applying pressure and heat, pressure and light, or pressure and current13,14,15. These unique structural and functional properties of Ti3O5 therefore have stimulated extensive research interests towards technological applications in optical storage media13, energy storage13,14,15,18,19,20, solar steam generation21, and gas sensors22,23,24.
To understand the nature of the phase transformation between the β and λ phases, many studies have been carried out. It was argued that the phase transition is driven by the coupling between the crystal lattice and excited electrons (or holes)25 or induced by tensile strain26. Recent ultrafast powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements, however, demonstrated that the strain waves propagating in a timescale of several picoseconds govern the phase transition16. Due to the anisotropy of the strain associated with the phase transition, the photoinduced phase transition in a single crystal of Ti3O5 occurs only when the pump pulse is applied on the ab plane17. This process has been recently resolved by direction-dependent interface propagation using interface models optimized by machine-learned force field method27. A recent study on doping reveals that it primarily alters the relative energy of both phases, but not the activation barrier28. Despite extensive studies, the underlying transition mechanism at an atomic level, particularly the kinetic pathway for the ultrafast and reversible transition, remains unclear. This is a known, challenging task for both experimental measurements and theoretical modeling. Specifically, experimental measurements often lack sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to capture atomistic events, whereas theoretical modeling requires accurate sampling of the potential energy surface (PES). Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), albeit with high accuracy, struggle in terms of the accessible time and length scales. Although machine-learning potentials (MLPs)29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 can significantly speed up MD simulations while retaining first-principles accuracy, exploring the time scales over which the β−λ phase transition occurs still represents a challenge. By contrast, advanced sampling techniques such as metadynamics41,42,43 allow for efficient sampling of the PES of interest and therefore have been successfully used to study barrier-crossing rare events10,11,12,44,45,46,47,48,49.
In this work, we have developed an accurate and efficient MLP through a combined on-the-fly active learning and advanced sampling method. It allows us to perform metadynamics simulations and large-scale MD simulations with ab initio accuracy and discover a kinetically favorable microscopic mechanism for the reconstructive β−λ phase transition. Our results unveil that the phase transition undergoes an interesting in-plane nucleated layer-by-layer kinetic transformation pathway. This is manifested by favorable in-plane intra-cell atomic movements forming two-dimensional (2D) nuclei, followed by propagating to neighboring layers via intermediate metastable crystalline phases comprised of β-like and λ-like structural motifs when the lattice strain along the c axis increases. Interestingly, we find that superlattices consisting of any combination of β-like and λ-like building blocks along the c axis are all metastable phases with no imaginary phonon modes. The presence of intermediate layer-by-layer kinetic transformation pathways greatly reduces the free-energy barrier, thereby naturally explaining why an ultrafast and reversible phenomenon can appear in a reconstructive solid-solid phase transition.
Results
Machine-learning potential development
Let us start with the MLP construction and validation. To develop an accurate MLP for describing the β−λ phase transition, a representative training dataset covering the phase space of interest is indispensable. This was achieved by combining an on-the-fly active learning procedure and the enhanced sampling technique (see “Methods"). The final training dataset consists of 3775 structures of 96 atoms, on which the MLP was generated using a moment tensor potential50. Through the kernel principal component analysis51 using the smooth overlap of atomic position descriptors52, we found that the training structures are indeed very representative and cover a wide range of the phase space. In particular, the phase transition pathway is well sampled by metadynamics simulations (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The generated MLP was carefully validated on a test dataset including 748 structures of 96 atoms, and it is capable of accurately predict the lattice parameters, energy-volume curves, and phonon dispersion relations of both β- and λ-Ti3O5, all in good agreement with the underlying density functional theory (DFT) calculations as well as available experimental data (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 2). For more details on the MLP construction and validation, we refer to “Methods". It is worth mentioning that the present MLP is also able to describe well the high-temperature α-Ti3O5 phase (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). In particular, the presence of imaginary phonon modes at 0 K and the absence of imaginary phonon modes at high temperatures due to anharmonic phonon-phonon interactions have been well reproduced by our developed MLP (Supplementary Fig. 1). This is not unexpected, since α-Ti3O5 shares similar local structural motifs as λ-Ti3O5.
Kinetically favorable layer-by-layer transformation pathway
Both the β- and λ-Ti3O5 phases have a monoclinic structure with the same space group of C2/m (Fig. 1d). In addition, their lattice parameters are very close, with the λ phase exhibiting a slightly larger c lattice constant (Supplementary Table 1). The noticeable difference between the two phases lies in that they exhibit distinct local structural motifs around the Ti3-Ti3 dimers, whereas the local structural environments around Ti1 and Ti2 atoms are similar. The phonon mode analysis indicates that the Ag phonon mode at Γ with 3.72 THz is responsible for the transition from β to λ, as the mode softens as the temperature increases. Reversibly, when going from λ to β, the Ag phonon mode at Γ with 4.58 THz plays a dominant role. It becomes soft as the pressure is increased over 3 GPa (see Supplementary Fig. 3). We note that the Bu mode at Γ previously identified in ref. 14 is not the decisive phonon mode to derive the phase transformation, since by following the eigenvector of this mode, one can not obtain the transition state with the typical feature of the rotation of Ti3-Ti3 dimers. Our phonon mode analysis is in line with our metadynamics simulations (see “Methods"), which show that during the β to λ transition, the Ti3-Ti3 dimers undergo a gradual rotation, accompanied by the breaking of Ti3-O4 bond and the formation of Ti3-O5 bond (Supplementary Fig. 4). It is interesting to note that only the atoms involving the Ti3-Ti3 dimers and associated O atoms participate in the intra-cell atomic movements, while the other atomic layers including Ti1 and Ti2 atoms almost remain unchanged. Our observations corroborate the structural changes inferred by femtosecond powder XRD16.
On the thermodynamic side, we computed Gibbs free energy via metadynamics simulations. For the choice of collective variable (CV), following ref. 46 the intensity of the XRD peak at 2θ = 22° [corresponding to the (100) plane] was used (Fig. 1a). It turns out that the employed CV is very efficient and can effectively distinguish the two phases, as manifested by frequent reversible transitions between the two phases (Fig. 1b). Using the reweighting technique53, the Gibbs free energies of the two phases were computed. By fully accounting for the anharmonic effects, the calculated phase transition temperature Tc and phase transition enthalpy ΔH at 0 GPa are 535 K and 0.091 eV/f.u., respectively, in good agreement with the experimental values (Tc = 470 K and ΔH = 0.124 ± 0.01 eV/f.u.)14 (Fig. 1c). By contrast, the quasi-harmonic approximation significantly overestimates the transition temperature (Fig. 1c). Using a similar procedure, a full ab initio pressure-temperature phase diagram has been established (Fig. 1d).
Kinetically, the direct phase transformation from β to λ in a concerted manner needs to overcome a larger energy barrier of 0.25 eV/f.u., as revealed by our variable-cell climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) calculations at 0 K (see Supplementary Fig. 5 and also ref. 54). This seems incompatible with the experimentally observed ultrafast and reversible nature of the transition14,16, indicating that the phase transition must undergo intermediate barrier-lowering kinetic transformation pathways. To confirm this, we computed the PES through metadynamics simulations using a supercell including three Ti3-Ti3 layers (Fig. 2a). The CVs were designed to be able to well describe the degree of the rotations of Ti3-Ti3 dimers in each layer (see “Methods" and Supplementary Fig. 6a). The computed free energy surface at 600 K and 0 GPa as a function of the employed CVs indeed identifies four energy minima, which correspond to β-Ti3O5, a ββλ-stacking phase, a βλλ-stacking phase, and λ-Ti3O5, respectively (Fig. 2b). Our phonon calculations revealed that both the ββλ-stacking and βλλ-stacking phases are dynamically stable (Supplementary Fig. 8). More interestingly, we predicted that all superlattices consisting of any combination of β-like and λ-like structural motifs along the c direction are dynamically stable (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. 8). They all adopt the same space group of C2/m. The dynamical stabilities were confirmed by performing phonon calculations on superlattices with up to eight building blocks using the developed MLP. The MLP predictions were verified by DFT calculations on small superlattices such as two-layer-stacking βλ phase and three-layer-stacking ββλ and βλλ phases (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c).
We further computed the energy-volume curves at 0 K and 0 GPa (Fig. 2c). One can see that the system volume (mostly the c lattice constant) increases as the number of λ-like building blocks increases. The energy-volume curves of the metastable ββλ and βλλ phases are evenly located between the ones of β-Ti3O5 and λ-Ti3O5. They almost share a common tangent line, implying that under specific negative pressure, the β to λ phase transformation is likely to go through the intermediate ββλ and βλλ metastable phases. Indeed, the free energies computed by metadynamics simulations at 600 K and 0 GPa demonstrated that as compared to the concerted β−λ phase transition, the existence of the intermediate ββλ and βλλ metastable phases significantly reduces the energy barrier from 0.19 eV/f.u. to 0.07 eV/f.u. (Fig. 2d), a small value for a solid-solid phase transition. The metadynamics free energy calculations are in line with the variable-cell CI-NEB calculations using the same three-layer supercell (Supplementary Fig. 9a). We would like to stress that the obtained layer-by-layer kinetic transformation mechanism is not limited to the three-layer supercell. Similar observations were also obtained for a larger five-layer supercell (Supplementary Fig. 9b). We note that this is the so-called Ostwald’s “rule of stages"55, which has been experimentally proved in solid-solid transitions of colloidal crystals mediated by a transient liquid intermediate56. However, the finding of metastable crystalline phases serving as the intermediate for a reconstructive solid-solid phase transition is rare.
The discovered kinetically favorable layer-by-layer transformation pathway is essentially determined by the specific structure correlation between the two phases. The shared common structural features (i.e., non-displacive Ti1-Ti1 and Ti2-Ti2 layers) exhibit twofold effects. One is to connect the β- or λ-like structural building blocks resulting in Lego-like metastable phases, and the other is to serve as blocking layers for the inter-layer propagation leading to the layer-by-layer kinetic transformation pathway. During the β−λ phase reconstruction, only Ti and O atoms associated with the Ti3-Ti3 layers are involved. In addition, only the relatively weak Ti3-O4 and Ti3-O5 chemical bonds need to be broken for β→λ and λ→β, respectively. This is evidenced by the DFT calculated electron localization functions (Supplementary Fig. 10) and also by the chemical analysis using integrated crystal-orbital Hamiltonian populations by Fu et al.25. In contrast, the Ti3-Ti3 chemical bonds forming a σ-bonding of dxy-like states21 remain intact. This explains why the value of the energy barrier for the β−λ transformation is low. Our observation provides a natural explanation for the ultrafast and reversible nature of the β−λ transition14,16.
Evidence of in-plane nucleated multistep kinetic mechanism
To further corroborate the layer-by-layer multistep kinetic mechanism for the β−λ phase transition as revealed by metadynamics simulations, we performed unbiased direct MD simulations. However, our tests showed that direct MD simulations were not capable of overcoming the energy barrier for the β−λ phase transition on a nanosecond timescale. Nevertheless, applying unidirectional tensile strain along the c-axis can significantly reduce the energy barrier (see Supplementary Fig. 11), making direct MD simulations possible26. Indeed, with an unidirectional tensile strain in the c-direction, the first-order phase transition from β to λ was successfully reproduced within ~1 ns by direct MD simulations on a 96-atom cell using the MLP, as manifested by an abrupt jump in the potential energy as well as stress (see Supplementary Fig. 12a, b). A closer inspection of local structure changes from the direct MD simulations verifies the metadynamics results(compare Supplementary Fig. 12c to Supplementary Fig. 4). We note in passing that applying a c-axis unidirectional strain in DFT also drives the β−λ phase transition (Supplementary Fig. 13).
In order to exclude the size effects and further clarify the phase transition details, we carried out large-scale MD simulations under continuously increasing tensile strain along the c axis using a large cell with 165,888 atoms (see “Methods" for details). Structural evolutions similarly to the small cell discussed above were observed (compare Fig. 3 to Supplementary Fig. 12). Nevertheless, the 2D in-plane nucleation and growth behavior accompanied by step-wise changes in the potential energy and stress can be better visualized in the large-scale MD simulations (see Fig. 3 and Supplementary Movie 1). It is interesting to observe that under continuously increasing tensile strain the β phase does not transform to the λ phase simultaneously in one step, but rather the transformation starts by the formation of 2D nuclei in the ab-plane and then grows successively layer-by-layer along the c axis mediated by metastable phases (see Fig. 3c). The easy propagation along the c axis arises from the lower energy barrier as compared to other two (a and b) directions, as recently revealed by Jütten and Bredow27. The deformation involving the Ti3-Ti3 dimers and associated O atoms does not propagate to the neighboring layers until the present layer completes the transition to the λ-Ti3O5-like structural motifs. The characteristic 2D growth behavior of the β- to λ-Ti3O5 transition is reflected by the step-wise potential energy as a function of strain (Fig. 3b). The growth of the λ-like structural motifs causes the tensile strain for the neighboring layers. This would decrease the kinetic energy barrier (Supplementary Fig. 11), thereby facilitating the layer-by-layer β to λ transformation. We note that the 2D layer-by-layer growth behavior can be better captured by using a smaller strain rate (Supplementary Fig. 14). In line with previous metadynamics results, our large-scale unbiased MD simulations consolidate the in-plane nucleated layer-by-layer kinetic mechanism for the β to λ transition and corroborate the strain wave pathway derived by experiment16. We notice that during the β to λ transition in the large-scale MD simulations, a defective metastable phase featured by incomplete rotation of Ti3-Ti3 dimers appears (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 15). This is likely caused by anisotropic strain energies associated with inhomogeneous lattice distortions17, because this metastable phase is found to be stable only under tensile strain and will transform to the more stable β phase after full structural relaxation.
It should be noted that the 2D in-plane nucleation and growth behavior of the β−λ phase transition is robust, regardless of the presence of external tensile strain. To demonstrate this, we carried out a computational experiment by artificially embedding a λ-Ti3O5-like nucleus with a radius of 60 Å in the β-Ti3O5 matrix (see “Methods" for details). The employed supercell model including 122,880 atoms is shown in Fig. 4a, b. This allows us to overcome the energy barrier of the β to λ transition and study the propagation and annihilation processes of the λ-Ti3O5-like nucleus by just tuning the temperature and pressure in a direct isothermal-isobaric MD simulation without applying any external forces. We found that at ambient pressure the preexisting λ-Ti3O5-like nucleus grows only within the layer and eventually extends to the full layer as the temperature goes over 1080 K. Below 1080 K it gradually disappears (see Fig. 4c, d and Supplementary Movie 2). However, the inter-layer propagation did not take place, in contrast to the tensile MD simulations. This is due to the insufficient driving force along the c axis. We note that the temperature at which the preexisting λ-Ti3O5-like nucleus starts to grow is higher than the thermodynamic phase transition temperature. This is likely caused by the presence of compressive strain in the nucleus. Indeed, the critical transition temperature is decreased when reducing the pressure to a negative value, and vice versa (Supplementary Fig. 16), in accordance with the established pressure-temperature phase diagram (Fig. 1). Our computational experiments combined with the c-axis tensile MD simulations clearly demonstrate that the intra-layer transformation and growth are more favorable, whereas the inter-layer growth starts to occur only when the c-axis strain is sufficiently large.
Kinetics of in-plane nucleation and growth
As discussed above, the β−λ phase transformation is initiated through in-plane nucleation and subsequently expands in a layer-by-layer manner. Nevertheless, further investigation is required to understand the specific kinetics involved in the process of in-plane nucleation and growth. To this end, we carried out variable-cell CI-NEB calculations using the MLP for transforming one layer of β-Ti3O5 from β-like to λ-like structural motifs. The results are displayed in Fig. 5. It is clear that the direct transformation in a concerted manner is energetically unfavorable because of the need to overcome a relatively large energy barrier (0.09 eV/f.u.) (see Path I in Fig. 5b). By contrast, the transformation via the in-plane nucleation is kinetically more favorable, with a decreased energy barrier of 0.07 eV/f.u. for the employed specific supercell (see Path II in Fig. 5b). We note that for the case of the nucleation mechanism, the energy barrier B is independent of the system size N, resulting in B/N ~ 0 when N is large, while for the case of a collective mechanism, the energy barrier B increases linearly with the system size N, leading to a constant ratio B/N with respect to N (see Supplementary Fig. 18). Furthermore, one can see that once the nucleation occurs, the subsequent in-plane growth proceeds with ease. Intriguingly, the in-plane growth process unveiled the presence of further intermediate metastable phases (B2 and B4 in Fig. 5b), whose dynamical stabilities were confirmed by phonon calculations (see Supplementary Fig. 17). The transformation from the metastable phase B2 to the metastable phase B4 only needs to overcome a minute energy barrier of 6 meV/f.u. (see Fig. 5b), indicating the easy in-plane growth. More detailed transformations for Paths I and II are provided in Supplementary Movie 3.
Discussion
Accurate atomistic simulations of solid-solid structural phase transitions are challenging. Simulations are hindered by the slow dynamics and the lack of accurate and efficient interatomic potentials. Here, the issue has been addressed by developing an efficient MLP with near-first-principles accuracy through a combination of an on-the-fly active learning method and an advanced sampling technique. It is remarkable that the generated MLP based on a simple standard PBE functional is capable of simultaneously describing well the lattice parameters, energy-volume curves, phase transition temperature, and phonon dispersion relations of both the β- and λ-Ti3O5 phases, and the high-temperature α-Ti3O5 phase. It also predicts Lego-like metastable phases that are not included in the training dataset. It is noteworthy that the PBE functional incorrectly predicts β-Ti3O5 to be a metal. PBEsol, SCAN, and hybrid functionals are also unable to open a band gap in β-Ti3O5 if magnetic ordering is not considered. Our study indicates that the electron correlation effects may not play a decisive role in the β−λ structural phase transition. Fundamentally, the implications of the present study are intriguing as it suggests that the phase transitions in Ti3O5 can be described on the level of the simplest mean field theory neglecting magnetism. It might be worthwhile to study the influence of vibrational contributions on phase transitions in other materials that are broadly considered to be strongly correlated. We note in passing that very recently an MLP was also developed by Jütten and Bredow27 to study the pressure effect on the phase transition of Ti3O5. However, their developed MLP was mainly used to optimize the interface models with mixed phases, while the kinetic phase transition details have not been explored.
The carefully validated MLP not only allows us to perform metadynamics simulations, but also enables us to carry out large-scale MD simulations. Using the intensity of the XRD peak as a collective variable for the metadynamics simulations, a full ab initio thermodynamic pressure-temperature phase diagram for the β and λ phases has been constructed, in good agreement with experiments. By performing large-scale MD simulations under c axis unidirectional tensile strain and using computational experiments with a preexisting λ-like nucleus in a β matrix, we have clarified that the phase transformation starts with favorable 2D nucleation in the ab plane, and then propagates to the neighboring layers through a multistep barrier-lowering kinetic pathway via intermediate metastable crystalline phases. This kinetically favorable in-plane nucleated multistep mechanism has not been revealed before and provides a straightforward interpretation of the experimentally observed unusual ultrafast dynamics in the reconstructive β−λ transition. Due to the structural similarity, we expect that the microscopic transition mechanism obtained here should also apply to phase transitions of other titanium suboxides, e.g., the γ- to δ-Ti3O5 transition57 and phase transitions in Ti4O758.
Finally, we would like to emphasize that the observed metastable phases are particularly interesting, since periodic superlattices formed by any combination of β-like and λ-like building blocks along the c axis are all dynamically stable. This flexibility opens avenues for tuning functional properties, e.g., insulator-to-metal transition and specific heat modulation. Consequently, our findings hold great potential for practical applications in the design of novel energy storage media, optical storage media, and sensor devices. Moreover, given the success of the developed MLP in predicting many undiscovered metastable phases, combining the present MLP with structure search tools would allow us to efficiently explore more unknown stable/metastable phases, not just limited to a small number of atoms59. Our work not only gives important insight into the microscopic mechanism for the β−λ phase transition, but also provides useful strategies and methods that can be widely used to tackle other complex structural phase transitions.
Methods
First-principles calculations
The first-principles calculations were performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)60. The generalized gradient approximation of Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE)61 was used for the exchange-correlation functional, which yields an excellent description of the experimental lattice parameters of both β- and λ-Ti3O5 as compared to other density functionals such as PBEsol62 and SCAN63 (see Supplementary Table 1). The standard projector-augmented-wave potentials (Ti_sv and O) were used. A plane wave cutoff of 520 eV and a Γ-centered k-point grid with a spacing of 0.21 Å−1 between k points (corresponding to a 3 × 3 × 3 k-point grid for a 96-atom supercell) were employed. This ensures that the total energy is converged to better than 1 meV/atom. The Gaussian smearing method with a smearing width of 0.05 eV was used. Whenever ground state structures were required, the electronic optimization was performed until the total energy difference between two iterations was less than 10−6 eV. The structures were optimized until the forces were smaller than 1 meV/Å. Since it was experimentally found that the β phase is a nonmagnetic semiconductor, while the λ phase is a weak Pauli paramagnetic metal13,64, nonmagnetic setups were thus adopted for all the calculations. This is a reasonable choice, since adopting the PBE functional with nonmagnetic setups yields good descriptions of not only the electronic structures13,21,64, but also the structural and thermodynamical properties of both β and λ phases (See Supplementary Note 1 for more detailed discussions). The D3 dispersion corrections65 were not included, since, for strongly ionic bulk materials, the D3 corrections are not expected to be accurate, and we found that inclusion of D3 correction deteriorates the description of lattice parameters and energy differences between the two phases (See Supplementary Table 1). The harmonic phonon dispersions were calculated by finite displacements using the Phonopy code66. The anharmonic phonon dispersions at finite temperatures were obtained using the temperature-dependent effective potential method67 and the anharmonic force constants were extracted using the ALAMODE code68. The variable-cell climbing image nudged elastic band method69 was used to estimate the energy barrier for the β−λ phase transition.
MLP construction and validation
The training dataset was initially constructed using the on-the-fly active learning method based on the Bayesian linear regression70,71 using the separable descriptors72, which allows us to efficiently sample the phase space and automatically collect the representative training structures during the AIMD simulations. The cutoff radius for the three-body descriptors and the width of the Gaussian functions used for broadening the atomic distributions of the three-body descriptors were set to 6 Å and 0.4 Å, respectively. The number of radial basis functions and maximum three-body momentum quantum number of the spherical harmonics used to expand the atomic distribution for the three-body descriptors were set to 14 and 4, respectively. The parameters for the two-body descriptors were the same as those for the three-body descriptors. The AIMD simulations were performed by heating the β- and λ-Ti3O5 phases of 96-atom supercell from 100 to 1500 K at ambient pressure and 10 GPa, in an isothermal-isobaric ensemble using a Langevin thermostat73 combined with the Parrinello-Rahman method74,75. Eventually, 3277 structures were selected in this step.
Since the phase transition from β- to λ-Ti3O5 is a barrier-crossing process, unbiased MD simulations hardly sample the PES along the transition path, even using the MLP at high temperatures. To address this issue, we first refitted the on-the-fly generated dataset using a moment tensor potential (MTP)50 that is in general one order of magnitude faster than the kernel-based methods for a comparable accuracy76,77. For the MTP potential training, a cutoff radius of 6.0 Å was used, and the radial basis size was set to 8. The MTP basis functions were selected such that the level of scalar basis Bα is less than or equal to 26 (i.e., levBα ≤ 26). The weights expressing the importance of energies, forces, and stress tensors were set to 1.0, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively. The regression coefficients (in total, 2153) were obtained by a non-linear least square optimization using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm78. Employing the generated MTP, we performed a long-timescale metadynamics simulations at 600 K and 0 GPa on a 96-atom supercell using the intensity of the XRD peak at 2θ = 22° as a collective variable following ref. 46 (see Fig. 1a). Afterwards, we computed the extrapolation grade for the structures from the metadynamics trajectory according to the D-optimality criterion79. The structures with an extrapolation grade over 3.0 (in total, 498 structures) were selected and added to the on-the-fly generated dataset. In the end, the training dataset contained 3775 structures of 96 atoms, on which the final MTP potential was trained using the MLIP package80.
The MTP potential was validated on a test dataset containing 748 structures of 96 atoms, which were randomly chosen from a metadynamics trajectory at 600 K using the generated MTP potential. These test structures cover a fraction of the phase space represented by the training dataset, as illustrated by the kernel principal component analysis in Supplementary Fig. 2a. The training and validation root-mean-square-errors (RMSEs) on energies, forces, and stress tensors calculated by the MTP are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2, showing a high accuracy of the generated MTP. Moreover, the accuracy of the MTP was carefully validated by predicting the lattice parameters, energy-volume curves, and phonon dispersion relations of both β- and λ-Ti3O5, exhibiting excellent agreement with the underlying PBE results as well as available experimental data (see Supplementary Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Table 1).
Metadynamics simulations
In order to simulate the β−λ phase transition and calculate the thermodynamic phase diagram, metadynamics simulations at various temperatures and pressures were carried out using the WTMetaD42. The isothermal-isobaric WTMetaD simulations were carried out using the LAMMPS code81 patched with the PLUMED code82. The temperature was controlled using the stochastic velocity rescaling thermostat83 with a relaxation time 0.1 ps. The pressure was controlled with the Parrinello-Rahman barostat75 with a relaxation time of 10 ps. The equations of motion were integrated using a time step of 2 fs. The bias factor that characterizes the rate of change of the deposited Gaussian height was set to 20. Gaussians with a width of 1 CV unit and an initial height of 5 kJ/mol were deposited every 1 ps to construct the history-dependent bias potential. For the choice of collective variable, the intensity of the XRD peak at 2θ = 22° was used, following ref. 46 (Fig. 1a). The Gibbs free energies were computed using the reweighting technique53.
For the description of layer-by-layer growth, we employed the summation of the projected displacements of all the Ti3-Ti3 dimers along the a and c axes in each layer as the CVs, which are able to describe the degree of rotations of Ti3-Ti3 dimers in each layer and well distinguish the four phases (i.e., β, ββλ, βλλ, and λ) (see Supplementary Fig. 6a for details). When calculating the PES for a concerted β−λ phase transition in a three-layer structure, the two CVs of the second layer d2 and the third layer d3 were constrained to be equal to that of the first layer d1 so that all the three layers were forced to transform simultaneously from β to λ. For the WTMetaD simulations, the width and the initial height of Gaussian were set to 1.2 Å and 25 kJ/mol, respectively. The bias factor was set to 30. The time interval for the deposit of Gaussians was set to 0.5 ps. The simulation time was set as 200 ns to ensure the convergence. After the sampling was finished, we reweighted the data to obtain the desired free energy surface using an on-the-fly strategy84.
Molecular dynamics simulations
MD simulations were performed using the LAMMPS code81 in an isothermal-isobaric ensemble. The temperature was controlled using a Nosé-Hoover thermostat85,86,87 with a relaxation time of 0.2 ps. The pressure was controlled with the Parrinello-Rahman barostat75 with a relaxation time of 0.1 ps. For the c-axis unidirectional continuous tensile MD simulations, a supercell consisting of 12 × 36 × 12 32-atom conventional cells (in total 165,888 atoms) was used. The strain rate was set to be 108/s. To model the intra-layer 2D growth behavior from β- to λ-Ti3O5, we built a β-Ti3O5 supercell consisting of 16 × 48 × 5 32-atom conventional cells (in total, 122,880 atoms) and then artificially created a λ-Ti3O5 layer (with a thickness equal to the c-axis lattice constant of 32-atom conventional cell) in a region with a radius of 60 Å in the middle of the supercell (see Fig. 4a, b).
Data availability
The data, including the crystal structures and phonon dispersions of all predicted stable and metastable phases, training and validation datasets, and the developed MLP, have been deposited in the figshare repository (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24279616) (ref. 88). The structure models used are provided in Supplementary Data 1. The other data that support this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
VASP can be acquired from the VASP Software GmbH (see www.vasp.at); MLlP is available at mlip.skoltech.ru; LAMMPS is available at www.lammps.org; PLUMED is available at www.plumed.org; OVITO is available at www.ovito.org; ALAMODE is available at alamode.readthedocs.io; Phonopy is available at phonopy.github.io/phonopy.
References
Porter, D. A., Easterling, K. E. & Sherif, M. Y. Phase transformations in metals and alloys (4th ed.) (CRC Press, 2021).
Jr, C., D, W. & Rethwisch, D. G. Fundamentals of materials science and engineering: an integrated approach (John Wiley & Sons, 2020).
Grünebohm, A. et al. A unifying perspective of common motifs that occur across disparate classes of materials harboring displacive phase transitions. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300754 (2023).
Irifune, T., Kurio, A., Sakamoto, S., Inoue, T. & Sumiya, H. Ultrahard polycrystalline diamond from graphite. Nature 421, 599–600 (2003).
Luo, K. et al. Coherent interfaces govern direct transformation from graphite to diamond. Nature 607, 486–491 (2022).
Kirby, S. H., Durham, W. B. & Stern, L. A. Mantle phase changes and deep-earthquake faulting in subducting lithosphere. Science 252, 216–225 (1991).
Cheng, B., Hamel, S. & Bethkenhagen, M. Thermodynamics of diamond formation from hydrocarbon mixtures in planets. Nat. Commun. 14, 1104 (2023).
Tolédano, P. & Dmitriev, V. Reconstructive phase transitions: In: Crystals and quasicrystals (World scientific, 1996).
Zhu, S., Yan, X., Liu, J., Oganov, A. R. & Zhu, Q. A revisited mechanism of the graphite-to-diamond transition at high temperature. Matter 3, 864–878 (2020).
Tong, Q. et al. Machine learning metadynamics simulation of reconstructive phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 103, 054107 (2021).
Badin, M. & Martoňák, R. Nucleating a different coordination in a crystal under pressure: a study of the B1-B2 transition in NaCl by metadynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 105701 (2021).
Santos-Florez, P. A., Yanxon, H., Kang, B., Yao, Y. & Zhu, Q. Size-dependent nucleation in crystal phase transition from machine learning metadynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 185701 (2022).
Ohkoshi, S.-i et al. Synthesis of a metal oxide with a room-temperature photoreversible phase transition. Nat. Chem. 2, 539–545 (2010).
Tokoro, H. et al. External stimulation-controllable heat-storage ceramics. Nat. Commun. 6, 7037 (2015).
Ohkoshi, S.-i et al. Low-pressure-responsive heat-storage ceramics for automobiles. Sci. Rep. 9, 13203 (2019).
Mariette, C. et al. Strain wave pathway to semiconductor-to-metal transition revealed by time-resolved X-ray powder diffraction. Nat. Commun. 12, 1239 (2021).
Saiki, T. et al. Selection rule for the photoinduced phase transition dominated by anisotropy of strain in Ti3O5. Phys. Rev. B 105, 075134 (2022).
Sun, P. et al. Ti3O5 nanofilm on carbon nanotubes by pulse laser deposition: enhanced electrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 548, 149269 (2021).
Nakamura, Y., Sakai, Y., Azuma, M. & ichi Ohkoshi, S. Long-term heat-storage ceramics absorbing thermal energy from hot water. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz5264 (2020).
Ohkoshi, S.-i, Yoshikiyo, M., MacDougall, J., Ikeda, Y. & Tokoro, H. Long-term heat-storage materials based on λ-Ti3O5 for green transformation (GX). Chem. Commun. 59, 7875–7886 (2023).
Yang, B. et al. Flatband λ-Ti3O5 towards extraordinary solar steam generation. Nature 622, 499 (2023).
Zheng, L. The preparation and oxygen-sensing properties of α-Ti3O5 thin film. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 88, 115–119 (2003).
Zhang, X. et al. Preparation and oxygen sensing properties of Ti3O5 submicron rods. Micro Nano Lett. 11, 811–813 (2016).
Zhao, P.-f et al. Progress in Ti3O5: synthesis, properties and applications. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 31, 3310–3327 (2021).
Fu, X. et al. Influences of hole/electron-lattice coupling on phase transition between λ-Ti3O5 and β-Ti3O5. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 46LT01 (2020).
Takeda, T. & Ohkoshi, S.-i Prediction of a tensile force-induced structural phase transition from β-Ti3O5 to λ-Ti3O5 by molecular dynamic simulations. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, e202101037 (2022).
Jütten, S. & Bredow, T. Anisotropy of the pressure effect in the Ti3O5 phase transition process resolved by direction-dependent interface propagation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 127, 20530–20538 (2023).
Jütten, S. & Bredow, T. Doping effect on the electronic structure and heat-storage properties of Ti3O5. J. Phys. Chem. C. 127, 10445–10452 (2023).
Deringer, V. L. et al. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem. Rev. 121, 10073–10141 (2021).
Behler, J. Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials. Chem. Rev. 121, 10037–10072 (2021).
Unke, O. T. et al. Machine learning force fields. Chem. Rev. 121, 10142–10186 (2021).
Liu, P., Verdi, C., Karsai, F. & Kresse, G. α-β phase transition of zirconium predicted by on-the-fly machine-learned force field. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 053804 (2021).
Verdi, C., Karsai, F., Liu, P., Jinnouchi, R. & Kresse, G. Thermal transport and phase transitions of zirconia by on-the-fly machine-learned interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 156 (2021).
Thompson, A., Swiler, L., Trott, C., Foiles, S. & Tucker, G. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).
Zhang, L., Wang, H., Car, R. & E, W. Phase diagram of a deep potential water model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 236001 (2021).
Wen, T., Zhang, L., Wang, H., E, W. & Srolovitz, D. J. Deep potentials for materials science. Mater. Futures 1, 022601 (2022).
Vandermause, J. et al. On-the-fly active learning of interpretable bayesian force fields for atomistic rare events. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 20 (2020).
Batzner, S. et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).
Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).
Pozdnyakov, S., Oganov, A. R., Mazhnik, E., Mazitov, A. & Kruglov, I. Fast general two- and three-body interatomic potential. Phys. Rev. B 107, 125160 (2023).
Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 12562–12566 (2002).
Barducci, A., Bussi, G. & Parrinello, M. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 020603 (2008).
Barducci, A., Bonomi, M. & Parrinello, M. Metadynamics. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 826–843 (2011).
Behler, J., Martoňák, R., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Metadynamics simulations of the high-pressure phases of silicon employing a high-dimensional neural network potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 185501 (2008).
Yao, Y., Klug, D. D., Sun, J. & Martoňák, R. Structural prediction and phase transformation mechanisms in calcium at high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 055503 (2009).
Niu, H., Piaggi, P. M., Invernizzi, M. & Parrinello, M. Molecular dynamics simulations of liquid silica crystallization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 5348–5352 (2018).
Niu, H., Bonati, L., Piaggi, P. M. & Parrinello, M. Ab initio phase diagram and nucleation of gallium. Nat. Commun. 11, 2654 (2020).
Gartner, T. E., Piaggi, P. M., Car, R., Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. & Debenedetti, P. G. Liquid-liquid transition in water from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 255702 (2022).
Yang, M., Karmakar, T. & Parrinello, M. Liquid-liquid critical point in phosphorus. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 080603 (2021).
Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).
Cheng, B. et al. Mapping materials and molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 1981–1991 (2020).
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).
Bonomi, M., Barducci, A. & Parrinello, M. Reconstructing the equilibrium Boltzmann distribution from well-tempered metadynamics. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1615–1621 (2009).
Jütten, S. & Bredow, T. First-principles investigation of electronic properties and phase transition of Ti3O5. J. Phys. Chem. C. 126, 7809–7817 (2022).
Ostwald, W. Studien über die bildung und umwandlung fester körper. Z. f.ür. Physik. Chem. 22, 289–330 (1897).
Peng, Y. et al. Two-step nucleation mechanism in solid–solid phase transitions. Nat. Mater. 14, 101–108 (2015).
Tanaka, K. et al. Structural phase transition between γ-Ti3O5 and δ-Ti3O5 by breaking of a one-dimensionally conducting pathway. Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 653–657 (2015).
Kamioka, H. et al. Time-resolved imaging and spectroscopy for the photo-induced phase transition in Ti4O7. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 311, 154–159 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. Data-driven prediction of complex crystal structures of dense lithium. Nat. Commun. 14, 2924 (2023).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Perdew, J. P. et al. Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).
Sun, J., Ruzsinszky, A. & Perdew, J. P. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).
Kobayashi, K. et al. Electronic structure and correlation in β-Ti3O5 and λ-Ti3O5 studied by hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 95, 085133 (2017).
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
Togo, A. & Tanaka, I. First principles phonon calculations in materials science. Scr. Mater. 108, 1–5 (2015).
Hellman, O., Abrikosov, I. A. & Simak, S. I. Lattice dynamics of anharmonic solids from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 84, 180301 (2011).
Tadano, T., Gohda, Y. & Tsuneyuki, S. Anharmonic force constants extracted from first-principles molecular dynamics: applications to heat transfer simulations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 225402 (2014).
Sheppard, D., Xiao, P., Chemelewski, W., Johnson, D. D. & Henkelman, G. A generalized solid-state nudged elastic band method. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 074103 (2012).
Jinnouchi, R., Lahnsteiner, J., Karsai, F., Kresse, G. & Bokdam, M. Phase transitions of hybrid perovskites simulated by machine-learning force fields trained on the fly with bayesian inference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 225701 (2019).
Jinnouchi, R., Karsai, F. & Kresse, G. On-the-fly machine learning force field generation: application to melting points. Phys. Rev. B 100, 014105 (2019).
Jinnouchi, R., Karsai, F., Verdi, C., Asahi, R. & Kresse, G. Descriptors representing two- and three-body atomic distributions and their effects on the accuracy of machine-learned inter-atomic potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 234102 (2020).
Allen, M. P. & Tildesley, D. J. Computer simulation of liquids (Oxford University Press, 2017).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Crystal structure and pair potentials: a molecular-dynamics study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196–1199 (1980).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Zuo, Y. et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731–745 (2020).
Liu, P. et al. Combining machine learning and many-body calculations: coverage-dependent adsorption of CO on Rh(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 078001 (2023).
Liu, D. C. & Nocedal, J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Math. Program. 45, 503–528 (1989).
Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 171–180 (2017).
Novikov, I. S., Gubaev, K., Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. The MLIP package: moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2021).
Thompson, A. P. et al. Lammps-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
Tribello, G. A., Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Camilloni, C. & Bussi, G. Plumed 2: new feathers for an old bird. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 604–613 (2014).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
Bussi, G. & Laio, A. Using metadynamics to explore complex free-energy landscapes. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 200–212 (2020).
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
Shuichi, N. Constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 103, 1–46 (1991).
Liu, M. et al. Layer-by-layer phase transformation in Ti3O5 revealed by machine learning molecular dynamics simulations. figshare repository. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24279616 (2024).
Acknowledgements
The work at the Institute of Metal Research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 52201030 and Grant no. 52188101), the National Key R& D Program of China 2021YFB3501503, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. ZDRW-CN-2021-2-5), and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant no. 51725103). The work at Northeastern University is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 52331001). J.H. and H.N. acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 22003050) and the Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NPU), China (grant no. 2020-QZ-03). G.K. acknowledges the support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within the SFB TACO (Project no. F 81-N).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.L. conceived the project. P.L. designed the research with the help of H.N., X.-Q.C. and L.Z. M.L., J.W., P. L., J.H. and H.N. performed the calculations. X.-Q.C., G.K. and L.Z. supervised the project. X.Y., J.L., H.Y., B.Y., Y.S. and C.C. participated in discussions. P.L. wrote the manuscript with inputs from other authors. All authors comment on the manuscript. M.L., J.W. and J.H. contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, M., Wang, J., Hu, J. et al. Layer-by-layer phase transformation in Ti3O5 revealed by machine-learning molecular dynamics simulations. Nat Commun 15, 3079 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47422-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47422-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.