Abstract
Despite the importance of Nitric Oxide (NO) as signaling molecule in both plant and animal development, the regulatory mechanisms downstream of NO remain largely unclear. Here, we show that NO is involved in Arabidopsis shoot stem cell control via modifying expression and activity of ARGONAUTE 4 (AGO4), a core component of the RNA-directed DNA Methylation (RdDM) pathway. Mutations in components of the RdDM pathway cause meristematic defects, and reduce responses of the stem cell system to NO signaling. Importantly, we find that the stem cell inducing WUSCHEL transcription factor directly interacts with AGO4 in a NO dependent manner, explaining how these two signaling systems may converge to modify DNA methylation patterns. Taken together, our results reveal that NO signaling plays an important role in controlling plant stem cell homeostasis via the regulation of de novo DNA methylation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Growth and development of plants rely on the continuous division and differentiation of stem cells that reside in specialized tissues, called meristems, located at the growth points of shoot and root, respectively. Stem cell fate in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) of the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana is tightly controlled by a complex regulatory network, including transcription factors and multiple signaling molecules1,2,3. A negative feedback loop between the stem cell inducing WUSCHEL (WUS) homeodomain transcription factor and the secreted peptide ligand CLAVATA3 (CLV3) is essential to maintain stem cell fate in the SAM4,5. WUS mRNA is expressed in the organizing center (OC), however, WUS protein moves apically to the stem cells where it induces stem cell fate and activates CLV3 expression6,7. Conversely, stem cells secrete the small peptide CLV3 that represses WUS expression in the niche via the CLAVATA1/2 (CLV1/2) and CORYNE (CRN) receptors, thus limiting the number of stem cells4,5,8,9. The peripheral zone (PZ) is found laterally to stem and niche cells and represents a domain of rapid cell proliferation, as well as for specification of organ primordia1,2,3,10,11,12. How stem cell activity is coordinated with cell proliferation and differentiation at the periphery is not well understood, but recent work has pointed to an important role of the CLE40 peptide acting via the BAM1 receptor in the communication of PZ and CZ13.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous biomolecule of the class of reactive nitrogen species (RNS), and has emerged as an important signaling molecule involved in diverse biological processes in both plants and animals14,15,16,17,18,19,20. In plants, NO has been shown to play a role in developmental and physiological processes, including floral transition, reaction to hypoxia, as well as immune and defense responses17,21,22,23. Additionally, several lines of evidence have suggested that redox state plays an important role in stem cell homeostasis, including the key redox component RNS and reactive oxygen species (ROS)15,19,24,25,26. NO and ROS are involved in controlling differentiation of embryonic stem cells in animals15,27,28 and more recently, they have been shown to act as important signals in root and shoot stem cell systems of plants16,19,20,24,25.
However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying NO activity in the control of stem cell fate in plants. In this study, we show that NO acts via the ARGONAUTE protein AGO4 at the transcriptional and post-translational level to affect genome wide DNA methylation patterns, which in turn are essential for proper meristem function.
Results
Nitric oxide promotes peripheral zone fate via repression of WUS
To investigate the role of NO in plant stem cell regulation, we first examined NO distribution in the SAM using a sensitive fluorescent indicator (4,5-diaminofluorescein diacetate, DAF-2DA)17,29. We found that NO accumulated to higher levels in the peripheral zone (PZ) compared to the central zone (CZ) (Supplementary Fig. 1a,d), suggesting that NO could act as a signal to define PZ cell fate. To explore the mechanism behind NO accumulation in the SAM periphery, we next examined the expression patterns of three important NO biosynthesis genes by in situ hybridization, including NIA1, NIA2, and NOA117,20,29,30,31,32. Interestingly, mRNAs for all three genes specifically accumulated in the PZ and cells of organ boundaries, but were absent from stem cells (Supplementary Fig. 2), consistent with NO distribution.
To functionally test the contribution of NO biosynthesis genes to SAM function, we analyzed NO-deficient mutants. At the seedling stage, both noa1 single mutants, as well as nia1/nia2/noa1 triple mutants exhibited a substantial delay in generating the first pair of true leaves (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Fig. 3), while after bolting they produced fewer floral buds compared to wild-type (Fig. 1c, d). Notably, SAMs of nia1/nia2/noa1 triple mutants were significantly smaller than those of wild-type controls, both at the seedling and inflorescence stage (Fig. 1m). To test whether these phenotypes were due to reduced stem cell activity or reduction of the PZ, we analyzed the expression of WUS and CLV3 as markers for organizing cells and stem cells, respectively, which are both found in the center of the SAM, as well as UFO and CUC2 as markers for the PZ and boundaries. Consistent with a role of NO in promoting PZ cell fate, we found that the expression of the stem cell regulator WUS was significantly increased in nia1/nia2/noa1 triple mutants, at both the vegetative and reproductive stages (Fig. 1e–h, o), along with an expansion of the stem cell domain during the reproductive stage and an increase of CLV3 expression (Fig. 1i–l, n, o). Importantly, we found that peripheral UFO expression was substantially reduced in triple mutants compared to wild-type, while the central expression was unaffected (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Similarly, we observed that the wild-type peripheral CUC2 expression domain was lost and replaced by a much more central RNA accumulation pattern in the triple mutants (Supplementary Fig. 4h, i). Taken together, these results suggested that NO acts in the periphery of the SAM to promote PZ cell fate, which is marked by high cell proliferation. At the same time, NO signaling represses central cell fate, likely via repressing WUS expression.
To circumvent the complex feedbacks of SAM regulation and test the short-term effects of NO on stem cell regulation, we transiently reduced endogenous NO levels using ethanol-inducible expression of an artificial microRNA against NOA1. After induction by 1% ethanol for 12 h, NOA1 expression levels were significantly reduced in transgenic plants (Supplementary Fig. 1h), along with endogenous NO levels (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c, g). In contrast, endogenous NO levels were not changed in the p35S::AlcR; pAlcA::GUS control plants (Supplementary Fig. 1e–g). Consistent with our results using stable mutant alleles, we observed an increase in both WUS and CLV3 expression following the reduction of endogenous NO (Supplementary Fig. 1h). To further explore the direct effects of NO signaling in the SAM, we turned to a pharmacological approach using a transgenic double reporter line for WUS and CLV3 and 3 h treatments with the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP)33 and the NO scavenger 2-4-carboxyphenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (c-PTIO)34. Consistent with our genetic interference with NO biosynthesis, we found the WUS reporter signal to be significantly reduced following activation of NO by SNP treatment (Fig. 2b, m). Conversely, WUS reporter levels and domain were dramatically increased after reduction of endogenous NO levels by c-PTIO treatment (Fig. 2c, m). Importantly, GFP fluorescence was not affected by modifying NO levels (Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). Interestingly, the CLV3 reporter was not significantly changed following either treatment (Fig. 2e, f, k, l), supporting the notion that NO acts mainly via WUS and that the indirect effect on stem cells had not set in after 3 h of perturbation. To test this hypothesis directly, we continuously increased NO levels in the CZ by expressing NOA1, one of the NO biosynthesis gene, from the CLV3 promoter. Supporting the idea that NO acts on stem cells indirectly via WUS, we observed a reduction of both WUS and CLV3 expression levels in the transgenic plants (Supplementary Fig. 6a–e). Consistent with an expansion of the PZ and associated enhanced cell proliferation, the transgenic plants had enlarged SAMs, despite the reduction in the CLV3 expression domain (Supplementary Fig. 6f, g). Taken together, our genetic and pharmacological results showed that NO acts from the periphery to promote PZ identity by limiting WUS expression and in turn stem cell fate.
One important mechanism required for proper SAM function in this scenario is the repression of NO biosynthesis in the cells of the organizing center and the stem cells. Since WUS has the capacity to act as a transcriptional repressor and is active in these two cell populations35,36,37, we inspected our resources on direct WUS target genes. Indeed, two of the NO biosynthesis genes, NIA1 and NIA2, were previously identified by ChIP-seq38 (Supplementary Fig. 7). We further tested the transcriptional response of NIA1, NIA2, and NOA1 to ectopically induced WUS activity and found that at the whole seedling level NIA1 and NOA1 showed a robust repression after 4 h of WUS induction (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c). Consistent with our published data, we detected WUS binding to the promoter of NIA1 by ChIP-PCR in a region containing putative WUS binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 8d). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) confirmed that WUS was able to bind to the ChIP-positive fragment in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 8e). These results indicated that WUS has the potential to directly repress NIA1 expression and suggested that the exclusion of NO biosynthesis genes from the CZ could be dependent on this stem cell master regulator.
Nitric oxide is a key regulator of ARGONAUTE 4
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the PZ cell fate promoting effect of NO, we next characterized the global transcriptional response to the NO donor SNP specifically in meristems. Previously, NO response genes were only identified in whole seedlings, severely limiting the detection of meristematic transcripts25. To circumvent this problem, we took advantage of the ap1/cal mutant, which is characterized by a massive over-proliferation and subsequent arrest of inflorescence and young floral meristems. To first test whether the global NO response in ap1/cal mutants is comparable to wild-type, we performed mRNA sequencing on wild-type and ap1/cal seedlings with and without SNP treatments. We observed a total of 10,993 and 12,401 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for wild-type and ap1/cal mutants, respectively. Importantly, 88% DEGs identified in the wild-type were confirmed in ap1/cal mutants (Supplementary Fig. 9), suggesting that the NO response in both genotypes is very similar. To identify meristem specific NO response genes, we next applied RNA-seq to micro-dissected shoot apices of ap1/cal mutants, which were either SNP or mock-treated for 24 h. From the data, we were able to identify 3217 DEGs, including 1309 mRNAs with reduced expression and 1908 transcripts showing elevated RNA accumulation (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). Zooming in on genes that may mediate the repression of stem cell fate, we integrated the set of SNP repressed transcripts with three published resources representing genes with expression the center of the SAM on the one hand39,40 and proteins which can be S-nitrosylated on the other hand41. S-nitrosylation is one of the most important post-translational modification mechanisms for NO function41,42,43,44, and thus, this integration allowed us to focus on targets which were co-expressed with WUS and CLV3 and could be regulated by NO at both transcript and protein levels. Interestingly, we only obtained one gene that was present in all four datasets (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Data 1–3), namely ARGONAUTE 4 (AGO4). AGO4 is known to function in the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway and is most closely related to AGO6 that had been shown to be expressed in the shoot meristem45,46,47,48,49. This finding led us to hypothesize that AGO4 might be involved in transmitting NO signals in the SAM via regulation of DNA methylation. To test this hypothesis, we first characterized the expression pattern of AGO4 in the SAM. By in situ hybridization, we found that AGO4 mRNA specifically accumulates in stem cells and niche cells, and is low or absent in cells at the periphery of the SAM in a pattern complementary to NO distribution (Fig. 3b–d, Supplementary Fig. 10). This finding was consistent with AGO4 expression being reduced by treatment with the NO donor SNP in our RNA-seq experiment (Fig. 3k) and suggested that NO signaling in the PZ could repress AGO4 expression. To verify these findings with spatial resolution, we treated plants with the NO donor SNP and examined AGO4 expression by in situ hybridization. Indeed, AGO4 mRNA levels were significantly reduced after SNP treatment in both wild-type and ap1/cal mutants (Fig. 3e–h), demonstrating that elevated NO signaling is sufficient to repress AGO4 expression even in stem cells and niche cells. To test if endogenous NO is required to define the specific AGO4 expression pattern, we analyzed SAMs of nia1/nia2/noa1 triple mutants and observed that AGO4 expression was substantially increased and expanded into the periphery of the SAM (Fig. 3i, j, l). Taken together, these results suggested that NO signaling is an essential upstream regulator of AGO4 transcription and acts to limit its expression to the CZ.
Since published data showed that AGO4 protein can be S-nitrosylated at C48241, we next examined whether NO affects AGO4 also at the post-transcriptional level. To this end, we performed a biotin switch assay50 using WT AGO4 (AGO4WT) and mutated AGO4 protein (AGO4C482S) and found that both forms of the AGO4 could be modified by S-nitroslation in response to NO treatment. Interestingly, AGO4C482S was less sensitive to the biotin switch (Fig. 3p), suggesting that C482 is a functional nitrosylation site, but that additional targets for this modification are likely to exist in AGO4. Since S-nitroslation can affect protein activity, sub-cellular localization, or protein stability41,42,43,44, we investigated the response of AGO4 protein to NO in vivo. To this end, we treated mCherry-AGO4 rescue plants51 with the NO donor SNP and found that following our standard treatment with 1 mM SNP mCherry-AGO4 signal was almost completely lost (Fig. 3m, n, Supplementary Fig. 11). Reducing SNP concentrations to 100 µM revealed that mCherry-AGO4 was found in the cytoplasm instead of accumulating in the nucleus as in control plants (Fig. 3m, o, Supplementary Fig. 11). Importantly, signal from mCherry-NLS controls was not affected by SNP (Supplementary Fig. 5e–h). Taken together, our results showed that NO is a key regulator of expression and activity of AGO4, which functions in the small RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway.
AGO4 protein connects WUS function with the RdDM pathway
AGO4 is a key component of the small RNA-induced silencing pathway and can direct de novo DNA methylation in the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway, together with its orthologues AGO6 and AGO945,46,47,48,49. To functionally test the contribution of AGO4 and the RdDM pathway to SAM activity, we first examined ago4 single mutants, ago4/ago6/ago9 triple mutants, as well as drm1/drm2 mutants, rdm1 mutants and drm1/drm2/met1 triple mutants representing downstream components involved in DNA methylation. We observed that ago4/ago6/ago9, drm1/drm2, and rdm1 mutants showed a reduced number of organs after flowering (Fig. 4a, c, Supplementary Fig. 12a–c), whereas ago4 single mutants didn’t show obvious defects (Fig. 4a, b). This suggested that AGO4 likely acts redundantly with AGO6 and AGO9 in maintaining a proper SAM, and that the DNA methylation enzymes of the RdDM pathway share this function. To explore the molecular mechanisms of RdDM-mediated SAM regulation, we analyzed WUS and CLV3 expression in SAMs of our set of mutants. Consistent with the observed phenotypes, we found that WUS transcripts were significantly reduced in ago4/ago6/ago9 and drm1/drm2/met1 triple mutants, whereas there was no obvious difference in ago4 single mutants (Fig. 4e–h, o). Surprisingly, we observed increased expression of CLV3 in both triple mutant lines, suggesting that inactivating the RdDM pathway makes CLV3 expression partially independent from the activation by WUS (Fig. 4i–l, o). This notion was supported by the finding that while SAM size was significantly reduced in the RdDM mutants, the size of the CLV3 domain was more or less unchanged (Fig. 4m, n). Taken together, these results demonstrated that the AGO4-mediated RdDM pathway is required for WUS function and for maintaining a proper balance between CZ and PZ.
To explore the mechanisms underlying the functional connection of WUS and AGO4, we compared their chromatin binding profiles38,52 and found that 31% of the AGO4 targets were shared by WUS (255 out of 820 genes) (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Data 4). Given the overlap in expression, function and chromatin binding, we speculated that AGO4 protein may interact with WUS protein in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we carried out Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assays using AGO4-mCherry and WUS-GFP, transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Indeed, we observed a robust interaction of AGO4 and WUS, which we could validate by co-IP (Fig. 5b–d). Interestingly, the WUS homeodomain was sufficient to mediate the interaction with AGO4, suggesting that AGO4 would not compete for binding with other known WUS co-factors, such as HAM1, which has been shown to bind to the C-terminus of WUS53. Furthermore, we found that the AGO4-WUS interaction was disrupted by SNP treatment (Fig. 5c, d), suggesting that NO signaling could directly modify the functional output of WUS.
We next asked whether the interaction of AGO4 and WUS plays a role in SAM control. To this end, we crossed ago4 into a weak wus-7 allele, to test for genetic interaction. Supporting the notion that the protein-protein interaction of WUS and AGO4 is important for proper SAM function, we observed a significant reduction in SAM size only in ago4/wus-7 double mutants, whereas the CLV3 domain was not changed similar to the ago or RdDM triple mutants (Fig. 5e–k). To test the relevance of the RdDM pathway for WUS function directly, we turned to WUS gain-of-function experiments using the DNA methylation triple mutants as backgrounds. Whereas expressing WUS from the CLV3 promoter in WT plants creates a positive feedback loop leading to the formation of a massively expanded stem cell pool54, this phenotype was largely suppressed in drm1/drm2/met1 triple mutants. Interestingly, in the rare cases we did observe stem cell expansion in this background, we were unable to detect the ectopic expression of CLV3, which is a hallmark of this phenotype in WT plants, and the functional readout for ectopic WUS activity (Supplementary Fig. 13e, f, k, and l). Consistent with this observation, expression of WUS from CLV3 promoter in drm1/drm2 significantly suppressed CLV3 expression (Supplementary Fig. 13e–h), although the phenotypic frequency was comparable to wild-type (Supplementary Fig. 13m). Interestingly, we found WUS to bind to many transposable elements with roughly 4000 binding events genome wide (Supplementary Fig. 14), suggesting that WUS could participate in repressing the activity of these elements. Taken together, these results demonstrated that AGO4 physically interacts with WUS and that this interaction, as well as the DNA methylation machinery of the RdDM pathway, is required for WUS activity and proper SAM function.
Nitric oxide controls expression of key meristem regulators via DNA methylation
Given the fact that AGO4 is able to direct DNA de novo methylation in plants45,46,47 and having shown that NO controls AGO4 at the transcriptional and post-translational levels, we speculated that some of the effects of NO we had observed were due to changes in DNA methylation patterns. To test this hypothesis, we treated ap1/cal meristems with SNP and quantified global DNA methylation. Indeed, DNA methylation levels were significantly reduced after SNP treatment (Fig. 6a), in line with the regulatory interaction of NO with AGO4. Since we found AGO4 and WUS to interact, we next tested whether DNA methylation at shared targets would be affected by NO signaling. To this end, we carried out whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on meristems that were treated with SNP or mock and found a total of 16,301 differential methylated regions (DMRs) (Supplementary Data 5). Among them, 96% of DMRs were in the CHH context, which is mediated by the RdDM pathway (Supplementary Fig. 15), indicating that NO affects RdDM activity in the SAM. Zooming in on the co-targets of WUS and AGO4, we found that 168 of 255 (65%) showed a significant reduction in DNA methylation (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Data 4). These results suggested that NO could affect meristem function by blocking de novo DNA methylation at WUS targets via the inhibition of AGO4. In this scenario, the expression of WUS targets relevant for SAM function should be enhanced following activation of NO signaling in the SAM, or perturbation of the RdDM pathway. To test this directly, we examined the 26 NO-induced plant stem cell-related genes identified here and previously25 in our methylation data and identified nine genes (ARR7, CLE13, CLV2, ERL2, ERL1, AT3G15150, BARD1, MEE22 and CRN), which exhibited substantially decreased DNA methylation following SNP treatment (Supplementary Fig. 16).
Since we had shown previously that ARR7 is directly repressed by WUS and has important roles for SAM function35,55,56, we decided to test whether ARR7 is also downstream of NO signaling and the RdDM pathway. To this end, we examined ARR7 expression in SAMs of wild-type, ago4, ago4/ago6/ago9, drm1/drm2, rdm1 and drm1/drm2/met1 mutants with and without SNP treatment. We observed a significant and consistent increase of ARR7 mRNA accumulation after SNP treatment in wild-type (Fig. 6d, h, l and Supplementary Figs. 17–19), which confirmed RNA-seq results and fitted well with the finding that SNP treatment reduced DNA methylation at the ARR7 promoter (Fig. 6c, d). Consistent with an important role for AGO genes and the RdDM pathway in repressing ARR7 expression, ARR7 mRNA also accumulated in the respective mutants without SNP treatment. Indeed, quantification of ARR7 mRNA levels by RT-qPCR demonstrated that the SNP effect on ARR7 expression was reduced in drm1/drm2 and rdm1 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 19), while it was fully repressed in ago and DNA methylation triple mutants, demonstrating that the effect of NO is largely mediated by the RdDM pathway (Fig. 6m). As we showed that AGO4 interacts with WUS in vivo, we wondered if AGO4 is recruited to the same sites of ARR7 promoter as WUS. To test this idea, we carried out ChIP experiments using mCherry-AGO4 rescue plants, and observed that binding of AGO4 to the ARR7 promoter overlaps with one of the regions also bound by WUS (Supplementary Fig. 20).
To further test the role of RdDM pathway in transmitting NO signals in the SAM, we next selected stem cell- and niche cell specific genes and examined their expression in the wild-type and in ago4, ago4/ago6/ago9, drm1/drm2, rdm1 and drm1/drm2/met1 mutants under SNP treatments. To our surprise, of the 12 stem cell- and niche-specific NO responsive genes, about half lost their response to SNP treatment in the drm1/drm2, rdm1, and ago4/ago6/ago9 mutants. Similarly, nine completely lost their response in the drm1/drm2/met1 mutants (Supplementary Fig. 21). Taken together, our results suggested that RdDM pathway downstream of AGO4 mediates NO signaling in the SAM and is essential for proper expression of core stem cell regulators.
Discussion
Nitric oxide has been shown to act as an important signaling molecule in highly diverse contexts, including priming cell fate, or defense across the plant and animal kingdoms14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Growing evidence suggests that NO is involved in stem cell regulation in animals15,27,28, although the molecular mechanisms so far remain largely elusive. Our results now reveal a central role for NO in the communication between the transit amplifying cells at the periphery and the stem cells in the center of the shoot stem cell system of Arabidopsis. Remarkably, NO signaling appears to restrict expression and activity of AGO4, a key component of the small RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway, to the center of the meristem. The RdDM pathway is an evolutionary conserved epigenetic machinery for gene silencing and genome stability, and is involved in diverse developmental processes in both plant and animals57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65. Recent evidence suggests that DNA methylation plays an important role for shoot and root meristem function and is likely more dynamic than anticipated66,67,68,69. We had previously shown that stem cell fate is dependent on large scale repression of gene expression by WUS, which could partially be explained by histone de-acetylation35,36,38. Our finding that WUS physically interacts with AGO4 and that this interaction is interrupted by NO now suggests that part of the repressive activity of WUS may be mediated by DNA methylation. We hypothesize that AGO4 and in turn the DNA methylation machinery is directed to WUS target loci via this interaction. One prominent example is ARR7, a well-studied direct negative WUS target, whose expression is substantially elevated in mutants of either AGO or DNA methylation genes. Importantly, the expression of the core stem cell signaling component CLV3 is enhanced by WUS4,5,6,7,8,9 and consistently, is not directly affected by NO signaling or mutations in the RdDM pathway. Taken together, the identification of the NO WUS-AGO4 interaction limited to the center of the meristem by NO may be able to explain the divergent functions of WUS in cells of the center versus the periphery. Although the first molecular link between NO signaling and stem cell fate in plants has now been established, many open questions remain. One pressing example is the regulation of WUS expression by NO and in this context, it will be important to elucidate the interaction of NO with the CLE40/BAM1 signaling system13. Furthermore, the idea that AGO4 can be recruited to chromatin by interaction with a transcription factor in addition to the canonical mechanism involving small RNAs, suggests that the RdDM pathway has been hijacked for developmental processes. Another striking facet is the realization that WUS binds to chromatin regions containing transposable elements, raising the possibility that this activity provides an additional layer or protection against mobilization of mobile genetic elements in stem cells. Initial studies using AlphaFold70,71 to model the AGO4-WUS interaction suggest that in addition to an interaction of the WUS homeodomain with AGO4, the largely unstructured part C-terminal of the homeodomain may be inserted into the central cleft of AGO4, which usually interacts with small RNAs. These findings now provide ample opportunity for detailed molecular studies, and open fascinating avenues to study the dynamics of epigenetic modifications.
Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) was used as the wild-type excepted where noted. The mCherry-AGO4 reporter was kindly provided by P. Jullien; the nia1/nia2/noa1 seeds by J. León; the ago4-5, ago4-6/ago6-2/ago9-1 seeds by M. Axtell; the rdm1 seeds by H. Ito; the CLV3 and WUS reporters were generated as described before72. All seeds were sterilized by applying 70% ethanol and 0.5% Tween for 10 mins, followed by washing two times with 95% ethanol and air drying. Afterwards, the seeds were sown on 0.8% Phyto agar plates (half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts and 1% sucrose), kept at 4 °C two overnights for imbibition. After germination, plants were transferred to soil and grown under long-day conditions (16 h day/8 h night regime at 21 °C).
Cloning
All constructs were generated using GreenGate cloning system73. Details about the cloning of the modules and assembled plasmids are listed in Supplementary Data 6.
In situ Hybridization
Templates for RNA probes were amplified from cDNAs using gene-specific primers containing T7 or T3 promoter sequences at the 5’ end. A complete list of primer sequences can be found in Supplementary Data 7. The RNA probes were synthesized by T7 RNA polymerase, and in situ hybridization was performed in accordance with standard protocols74.
RNA sequencing and analysis
Shoot apices from 6-week inflorescences of ap1/cal (Col-0) with and without SNP treatments were collected. Total RNA (10 μg) was subjected to DNase I treatment, and mRNA was kit purified (Life Technology). Strand-specific RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina following the manufacturer’s instructions and were subjected to NextSeq550 for 75 bp end sequencing. Reads were aligned to the Arabidopsis TAIR10 reference genome using STAR, and differentially expressed genes were called using DEGseq75 with the criterion of fold-change ≥1.5 and p-value < 0.01. For RNA sequencing, each condition was analyzed in three biological replicates. The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession numbers GSE216952 and GSE243447.
Enzymatic methyl-seq (EM-seq) sequencing and analysis
Genomic DNA from ap1/cal shoot apices with and without 24 h SNP treatments, was extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), and was sheared to approximately 250 bp fragments. EM-seq libraries were prepared from sheared DNA using an enzymatic methyl-seq kit following the standard instructions (New England BioLabs), and were subjected to NextSeq550 using 75 bp paired-end sequencing. The C to T conversion rates were 99% and the genome coverage was 10× for the EM-seq data. Methylated cytosines were extracted from aligned reads using the Bismark methylation extractor with default parameters. All analyses were done using sites covered by a minimum of 10 reads in both samples. Only 5-mC sites supported by two biological replicates were considered for further analysis. The DNA methylation levels were calculated as described before76. Briefly, DNA methylation level at each site or region was calculated by number of C vs total C and T account. The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession number GSE216952.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed on pUBQ10::mCherry-GR-WUS and mCherry-AGO4 rescue plants. ChIP was conducted as previously described with minor modifications77. A Diagenode Bioruptor UCD-200 was used for sonication (30 s on, 30 s off, medium, 15 min duration; sonication buffer: 10 mM Na3PO4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% sarkosyl, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 tablet per 10 ml, pH 7). GR antibodies (Santa Cruz, sc-393232) and RFP-Trap Magnetic Agarose (ChromoTek, rtma-20) were used to precipitate chromatin, and no antibody was used as negative controls.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
The homeodomain of WUS was cloned behind a 6xHis-MBP tag. The protein was produced in Escherichia coli strain Rosetta and purified with nickel Sepharose media (GE Healthcare). EMSA was performed according to the reference guide of the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Scientific 20148), and probes were labeled with biotin. The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 7.
FRET
FRET was measured by using increase in donor fluorescence upon bleaching of the acceptor as readout. Three independent experiments were performed, and per experiment, at least 20 cells per sample were analyzed. To drive expression in N. benthamiana leaves, the 35 S or UBQ10 promoter was used.
Confocal microscopy
For imaging of pCLV3::mTagBFP2, pWUS::2xVenus-NLS, pUBQ10::mCherry, and pH3.3::GFP, inflorescences were dissected and imaged on an upright Nikon A1 Confocal with a CFI Apo LWD 25 × water immersion objective (Nikon Instruments) without coverslip as described38.
Global DNA methylation assay
The global DNA methylation levels were measured by using a Global DNA Methylation Assay Kit (abcam, ab233486) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Accession numbers
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative numbers for the genes mentioned in this article are as follows: NIA1 (AT1G77760); NIA2 (AT1G37130); NOA1 (AT3G47450); WUS (AT2G17950); CLV3 (AT2G27250); AGO4 (AT2G27040); AGO6 (AT2G32940); AGO9 (AT5G21150); DRM1 (AT5G15380); DRM2 (AT5G14620); MET1 (AT5G49160); ARR7 (AT1G19050); RDM1 (AT3G22680); UFO (AT1G30950); CUC2 (AT5G53950); AP1 (AT1G69120); CAL (AT1G26310).
Statistical analysis
Differences between groups were identified using two-sided Student’s t-test, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Details and sample sizes as well as the numbers of biological replicates are provided in the respective figure legends.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data underlying Figs. 1m, n; 2m; 3p; 4m, n; 5b–d, k; 6a and Supplementary Figs. 1g; 3d; 5d, h; 6h, i; 8e; 12j, k; 13m are provided in the Source Data file. RNA-seq, EM-seq, and ChIP-seq raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession numbers GSE216952 and GSE243447. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Aichinger, E., Kornet, N., Friedrich, T. & Laux, T. Plant stem cell niches. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 615–636 (2012).
Greb, T. & Lohmann, J. U. Plant stem cells. Curr. Biol. 26, 816–821 (2016).
Stahl, Y. & Simon, R. Plant stem cell niches. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 49, 479–489 (2005).
Fletcher, J. C., Brand, U., Running, M. P., Simon, R. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283, 1911–1914 (1999).
Mayer, K. F. et al. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95, 805–815 (1998).
Daum, G., Medzihradszky, A., Suzaki, T. & Lohmann, J. U. A mechanistic framework for noncell autonomous stem cell induction in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14619–14624 (2014).
Yadav, R. K. et al. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev. 25, 2025–2030 (2011).
Schoof, H. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100, 635–644 (2000).
Brand, U., Fletcher, J. C., Hobe, M., Meyerowitz, E. M. & Simon, R. Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 289, 617–619 (2000).
Galvan-Ampudia, C. S. et al. Temporal integration of auxin information for the regulation of patterning. eLife 9, e55832 (2020).
Grandjean, O. et al. In vivo analysis of cell division, cell growth, and differentiation at the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16, 74–87 (2004).
Reddy, G. V., Heisler, M. G., Ehrhardt, D. W. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Real-time lineage analysis reveals oriented cell divisions associated with morphogenesis at the shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131, 4225–4237 (2004).
Schlegel, J. et al. Control of Arabidopsis shoot stem cell homeostasis by two antagonistic CLE peptide signalling pathways. eLife 10, e70934 (2021).
Besson-Bard, A. et al. Current view of nitric oxide-responsive genes in plants. Plant Sci. 177, 302–309 (2009).
Caballano-Infantes, E., Cahuana, G. M., Bedoya, F. J., Salguero-Aranda, C. & Tejedo, J. R. The role of nitric oxide in stem cell biology. Antioxidants 11, 497 (2022).
Fernandez-Marcos, M., Sanz, L., Lewis, D. R., Muday, G. K. & Lorenzo, O. Nitric oxide causes root apical meristem defects and growth inhibition while reducing PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1)-dependent acropetal auxin transport. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18506–18511 (2011).
He, Y. et al. Nitric oxide represses the Arabidopsis floral transition. Science 305, 1968–1971 (2004).
Modun, D., Giustarini, D. & Tsikas, D. Nitric oxide-related oxidative stress and redox status in health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2014, 129651 (2014).
Sanz, L. et al. Nitric oxide plays a role in stem cell niche homeostasis through its interaction with auxin. Plant Physiol. 166, 1972–1984 (2014).
Shen, Q., Wang, Y. T., Tian, H. & Guo, F. Q. Nitric oxide mediates cytokinin functions in cell proliferation and meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 6, 1214–1225 (2013).
Fancy, N. N., Bahlmann, A. K. & Loake, G. J. Nitric oxide function in plant abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 462–472 (2017).
Wink, D. A. et al. Nitric oxide and redox mechanisms in the immune response. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89, 873–891 (2011).
Hartman, S. et al. Ethylene-mediated nitric oxide depletion pre-adapts plants to hypoxia stress. Nat. Commun. 10, 4020 (2019).
Zeng, J., Dong, Z., Wu, H., Tian, Z. & Zhao, Z. Redox regulation of plant stem cell fate. EMBO J. 36, 2844–2855 (2017).
Shahid, M. et al. Comprehensive analyses of nitric oxide-induced plant stem cell-related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes 10, 190 (2019).
Wany, A., Foyer, C. H. & Gupta, K. J. Nitrate, NO and ROS signaling in stem cell homeostasis. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 1041–1044 (2018).
Mora-Castilla, S. et al. Nitric oxide repression of Nanog promotes mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 17, 1025–1033 (2010).
Mujoo, K. et al. Role of nitric oxide signaling components in differentiation of embryonic stem cells into myocardial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18924–18929 (2008).
Guo, F. Q., Okamoto, M. & Crawford, N. M. Identification of a plant nitric oxide synthase gene involved in hormonal signaling. Science 302, 100–103 (2003).
Lozano-Juste, J. & Leon, J. Enhanced abscisic acid-mediated responses in nia1nia2noa1-2 triple mutant impaired in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-dependent nitric oxide biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152, 891–903 (2010).
Tewari, R. K. et al. The nitric oxide suppressed Arabidopsis mutants- Atnoa1 and Atnia1nia2noa1-2 produce nitric oxide in MS growth medium and on uranium exposure. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 140, 9–17 (2019).
Xie, Y. J. et al. Roles of NIA/NR/NOA1-dependent nitric oxide production and HY1 expression in the modulation of Arabidopsis salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3045–3060 (2013).
Bethke, P. C., Libourel, I. G., Reinohl, V. & Jones, R. L. Sodium nitroprusside, cyanide, nitrite, and nitrate break Arabidopsis seed dormancy in a nitric oxide-dependent manner. Planta 223, 805–812 (2006).
Vitecek, J., Reinohl, V., Jones, R. L. & Measuring, N. O. production by plant tissues and suspension cultured cells. Mol. Plant 1, 270–284 (2008).
Leibfried, A. et al. WUSCHEL controls meristem function by direct regulation of cytokinin-inducible response regulators. Nature 438, 1172–1175 (2005).
Busch, W. et al. Transcriptional control of a plant stem cell niche. Dev. Cell 18, 849–861 (2010).
Ikeda, M., Mitsuda, N. & Ohme-Takagi, M. Arabidopsis WUSCHEL is a bifunctional transcription factor that acts as a repressor in stem cell regulation and as an activator in floral patterning. Plant Cell 21, 3493–3505 (2009).
Ma, Y. F. et al. WUSCHEL acts as an auxin response rheostat to maintain apical stem cells in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 10, 5093 (2019).
Tian, C. et al. A gene expression map of shoot domains reveals regulatory mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 10, 141 (2019).
Yadav, R. K., Girke, T., Pasala, S., Xie, M. & Reddy, G. V. Gene expression map of the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem stem cell niche. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4941–4946 (2009).
Hu, J. L. et al. Site-specific nitrosoproteomic identification of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 167, 1731–1746 (2015).
Feng, J. et al. S-nitrosylation of phosphotransfer proteins represses cytokinin signaling. Nat. Commun. 4, 1529 (2013).
Jaffrey, S. R., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Ferris, C. D., Tempst, P. & Snyder, S. H. Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 193–197 (2001).
Feng, J., Chen, L. & Zuo, J. Protein S-nitrosylation in plants: current progresses and challenges. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 61, 1206–1223 (2019).
Mallory, A. & Vaucheret, H. Form, function, and regulation of ARGONAUTE proteins. Plant Cell 22, 3879–3889 (2010).
Duan, C. G. et al. Specific but interdependent functions for Arabidopsis AGO4 and AGO6 in RNA-directed DNA methylation. EMBO J. 34, 581–592 (2015).
Li, Z. C. et al. Origin, evolution, and diversification of plant ARGONAUTE proteins. Plant J. 109, 1086–1097 (2022).
Rodriguez-Leal, D., Castillo-Cobian, A., Rodriguez-Arevalo, I. & Vielle-Calzada, J. P. A primary sequence analysis of the ARGONAUTE protein family in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1347 (2016).
Eun, C. et al. AGO6 functions in RNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing in shoot and root meristems in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 6, e25730 (2011).
Jaffrey, S. R. & Snyder, S. H. The biotin switch method for the detection of S-nitrosylated proteins. Sci. STKE 2001, pl1 (2001).
Jullien, P. E., Schroder, J. A., Bonnet, D. M. V., Pumplin, N. & Voinnet, O. Asymmetric expression of Argonautes in reproductive tissues. Plant Physiol. 188, 38–43 (2022).
Zheng, Q. et al. RNA polymerase V targets transcriptional silencing components to promoters of protein-coding genes. Plant J. 73, 179–189 (2013).
Zhou, Y. et al. Control of plant stem cell function by conserved interacting transcriptional regulators. Nature 517, 377–380 (2015).
Brand, U., Grunewald, M., Hobe, M. & Simon, R. Regulation of CLV3 expression by two homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 129, 565–575 (2002).
Zhao, Z. et al. Hormonal control of the shoot stem-cell niche. Nature 465, 1089–1092 (2010).
Buechel, S. et al. Role of A-type ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATORS in meristem maintenance and regeneration. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 89, 279–284 (2010).
Bouyer, D. et al. DNA methylation dynamics during early plant life. Genome Biol. 18, 179 (2017).
Goll, M. G. & Bestor, T. H. Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 481–514 (2005).
He, X. J., Chen, T. & Zhu, J. K. Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals. Cell Res. 21, 442–465 (2011).
Schmitz, R. J., Lewis, Z. A. & Goll, M. G. DNA methylation: shared and divergent features across eukaryotes. Trends Genet. 35, 818–827 (2019).
Deaton, A. M. & Bird, A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 25, 1010–1022 (2011).
Heard, E. & Martienssen, R. A. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms. Cell 157, 95–109 (2014).
Jullien, P. E., Susaki, D., Yelagandula, R., Higashiyama, T. & Berger, F. DNA methylation dynamics during sexual reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 22, 1825–1830 (2012).
Law, J. A. & Jacobsen, S. E. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 204–220 (2010).
Feng, S., Jacobsen, S. E. & Reik, W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330, 622–627 (2010).
Kawakatsu, T. et al. Unique cell-type-specific patterns of DNA methylation in the root meristem. Nat. Plants 2, 16058 (2016).
Nguyen, V. & Gutzat, R. Epigenetic regulation in the shoot apical meristem. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 69, 102267 (2022).
Higo, A. et al. DNA methylation is reconfigured at the onset of reproduction in rice shoot apical meristem. Nat. Commun. 11, 4079 (2020).
Gutzat, R. et al. Arabidopsis shoot stem cells display dynamic transcription and DNA methylation patterns. EMBO J. 39, e103667 (2020).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 439–444 (2022).
Wenzl, C. & Lohmann, J. U. 3D imaging reveals apical stem cell responses to ambient temperature. Cells Dev. 175, 203850 (2023).
Lampropoulos, A. et al. GreenGate - a novel, versatile, and efficient cloning system for plant transgenesis. PLoS ONE 8, e83043 (2013).
Andersen, S. U. et al. Requirement of B2-type cyclin-dependent kinases for meristem integrity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 20, 88–100 (2008).
Wang, L. K., Feng, Z. X., Wang, X., Wang, X. W. & Zhang, X. G. DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 26, 136–138 (2010).
Feng, S., Zhong, Z., Wang, M. & Jacobsen, S. E. Efficient and accurate determination of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana with enzymatic methyl sequencing. Epigenetics Chromatin 13, 42 (2020).
Zeng, J. et al. Endogenous stress-related signal directs shoot stem cell fate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Plants 7, 1276 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Jullien for sharing the mCherry-AGO4 transgenic line before publication, J. León for sharing the nia1/nia2/noa1 seeds, M. Axtell for sharing the ago4-5 and ago4/ago6/ago9 seeds, H. Ito for sharing the rdm1 seeds. We thank Z. Zhao for stimulating discussion and advice. This work was supported by the ERC through the Synergy Grant 810296 “DECODE” to J.U.L.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.Z., X.Z., and J.U.L. designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper with input from all other authors. X.Z. performed the RNA-seq, the BS-seq, and the EMSA experiments. Z.L. analyzed the RNA-seq and the BS-seq data. I.H., M.G., and S.G. preformed and analyzed ChIP-seq. P.F. conducted the FRET assays. C.W. generated the reporter lines for WUS and CLV3. S.G. performed bioinformatic analyses. J.Z. conducted all the other experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Yuling Jiao and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, J., Zhao, X., Liang, Z. et al. Nitric oxide controls shoot meristem activity via regulation of DNA methylation. Nat Commun 14, 8001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43705-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43705-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.