Abstract
The BRAF gene is mutated in a plethora of human cancers. The majority of such molecular lesions result in the expression of a constitutively active BRAF variant (BRAFV600E) which continuously bolsters cell proliferation. Although we recently addressed the early effects triggered by BRAFV600E-activation, the specific contribution of ERK1 and ERK2 in BRAFV600E-driven responses in vivo has never been explored. Here we describe the first murine model suitable for genetically dissecting the ERK1/ERK2 impact in multiple phenotypes induced by ubiquitous BRAFV600E-expression. We unveil that ERK1 is dispensable for BRAFV600E-dependent lifespan shortening and for BRAFV600E-driven tumor growth. We show that BRAFV600E-expression provokes an ERK1-independent lymphocyte depletion which does not rely on p21CIP1-induced cell cycle arrest and is unresponsive to ERK-chemical inhibition. Moreover, we also reveal that ERK1 is dispensable for BRAFV600E-triggered cytotoxicity in lungs and that ERK-chemical inhibition abrogates some of these detrimental effects, such as DNA damage, in Club cells but not in pulmonary lymphocytes. Our data suggest that ERK1/ERK2 contribution to BRAFV600E-driven phenotypes is dynamic and varies dependently on cell type, the biological function, and the level of ERK-pathway activation. Our findings also provide useful insights into the comprehension of BRAFV600E-driven malignancies pathophysiology as well as the consequences in vivo of novel ERK pathway-targeted anti-cancer therapies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The BRAF gene, coding for a master kinase of RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (ERK-) pathway, is mutated in a plethora of human cancers [1,2,3,4,5]. The vast majority of such molecular lesions affect codon 600 of the corresponding gene product, and out of these, ~90% is represented by the 1799T>A nucleotide transition resulting in the substitution of glutamic acid for valine. The resulting BRAFV600E kinase is regarded as a constitutively active BRAF [6] mutant which bolsters cell proliferation independently of external mitogenic stimuli.
A consistent number of genetically engineered mouse models in which BRAFV600E expression is driven by tissue-specific promoters shed light on the role of this oncogene in human malignancies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Nevertheless, such a strategy did not allow to dissect the overall impact in vivo of the early phenotypes elicited by ubiquitous BRAFV600E-activation. Albeit we recently addressed such point [15], the specific contribution of ERK1 and ERK2 in the BRAFV600E-driven responses [15] in vivo, such as reduced lifespan, tumor initiation and progression, oncogene-induced senescence and cytotoxicity in different cell types such as Club Cells (CCs) and lymphocytes has never been explored. Here we generated the very first murine model which allows to genetically dissect the contribution of ERK1/ERK2 in multiple phenotypes induced by chronic as well as acute ubiquitous BRAFV600E-expression.
Results
Role of ERK1 in BRAFV600E mouse viability and in the development of spontaneous BRAFV600E-driven tumors
To establish the role of ERK1 and ERK2 in the BRAFV600E-induced phenotypes in vivo [15], we generated UbiCreERT2/+; Erk1−/−; Erk2lox/lox; BRAFLSL_V600E/+ (Erk;BRAFV600E) mice harboring UbiCreERT2 allele [15, 16], expressing the conditionally active CreERT2 recombinase gene under the control of the human ubiquitin promoter (UbiCreERT2), combined with BRAFLSL_V600E allele [8, 15] (BRAFV600E), the conditional floxed allele for Erk2 [17] (Erk2lox/lox) and the constitutive knock-out allele for Erk1 [18] (Erk1−/−). As control groups we used the mice bearing the UbiCreERT2/+ allele alone (wild-type; WT) or in combination with either Erk1−/−; Erk2lox/lox alleles (Erk) or BRAFLSL_V600E/+ (BRAFV600E) (Fig. 1A).
We recently provided evidence that the spontaneous Cre-mediated activation of BRAFV600E over time resulted in reduced viability, development of spontaneous skin papillomas and lung adenomas in mouse models [15] in the absence of tamoxifen (TMX) treatment for the Cre activation. Interestingly, in a way similar to the BRAFV600E mice, untreated 10-week-old Erk;BRAFV600E mice, but not either the Erk or WT mice, showed weight loss, bad shape, papillomatous skin lesions and all of them died between 11 and 17 weeks from birth, thus suggesting that the Erk1 constitutive loss is not able to rescue the lethality depending on the random expression of BRAFV600E due to spontaneous Cre-activation over time (Fig. 1B). Moreover, regardless the presence of ERK1, both BRAFV600E and Erk;BRAFV600E mice, but not either WT or Erk groups (Supplementary Fig. 1A), showed skin papillomas, due to spontaneous Cre-dependent recombination of BRAFV600E allele (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Importantly, albeit Erk;BRAFV600E mice tend to develop less papillomas, such a difference in tumor occurrence does not reach the statistical significance (Fig. 1C). Moreover, western blot (WB) analysis of such papillomatous lesions confirmed the total absence of ERK1, but not of ERK2, in Erk;BRAFV600E papillomas compared to BRAFV600E lesions (Fig. 1D), therefore strongly indicating that ERK1 constitutive abrogation does not prevent BRAFV600E random activation from giving rise to spontaneous papillomas. However, the low frequency of spontaneous papillomas in both BRAFV600E and Erk, BRAFV600E mice prevented us from performing more detailed analyses in such skin tumors.
In contrast, although the constitutive ablation of ERK1 does not abolish the ability of BRAFV600E to induce lung tumors arising from alveolar type II cells (ATIIs), compared to the BRAFV600E strain, untreated Erk;BRAFV600E mice showed a significant decrease in the number lung adenomas staining positive for the prosurfactant C (SPC) ATII marker (Fig. 1E; Supplementary Fig. 1C). WB experiments from the lungs of these mice revealed that, whereas neither total nor the phosphorylated fraction of ERK2 was altered, ERK1 signal was not detectable (Supplementary Fig. 1D). In line with this, Erk;BRAFV600E adenomas display a dramatic decrease in the intensity of total ERK1/2 staining compared to BRAFV600E tumors, thus further confirming that they have risen in an Erk1−/− genetic background (Supplementary Fig. 2A). Importantly, upon Erk1 deletion, no significant changes in either tumor size, proliferative index, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, senescence or apoptosis as indicated, respectively, by Ki67, γH2AX, p21CIP1, p53 and cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) markers, were observed in Erk;BRAFV600E lung tumors compared to BRAFV600E adenomas (Fig. 1E–K), thus strongly suggesting that ERK1 is dispensable for BRAFV600E-driven lung adenomas growth and progression. Moreover, by staining such adenomas with specific antibodies raised against F4/80, CD45R, and CD3, which are cell-specific markers respectively for macrophages, B-lymphocytes [19, 20], and T-lymphocytes [21, 22], we found no alterations in the recruitment of tumor-associated leukocytes (TALs) such as macrophages, T- and B- lymphocytes infiltrated inside the adenomas (Fig. 1L–N), therefore indicating that ERK1 loss does not affect the ability of BRAFV600E-driven tumors to recruit TALs. These findings suggest that, despite ERK1 loss may partially inhibit BRAFV600E lung adenoma initiation, once the tumor is established, ERK1 does not affect either BRAFV600E-driven tumor development or immune cell recruitment to the adenomas. However, we do not rule out the possibility that a random inactivation of Erk2, in Erk1−/− background, might play a role in such inhibitory effect in tumor initiation.
Next, to better understand how Erk1 genetic ablation might affect tumor initiation in Erk;BRAFV600E strain, we also checked whether the lung parenchyma of such mice might display typical features of cell cytotoxicity. Nevertheless, histopathological analysis showed that the reduction in tumor number observed upon Erk1 loss is not associated to any alteration in the number of either Ki67-, p21CIP1- or CC3-positive cells in the alveolar parenchyma of Erk;BRAFV600E mice compared to BRAFV600E strain. Thus, these data suggest that the decreased adenoma occurrence observed in Erk;BRAFV600E strain may not be ascribable to any detectable alteration in respectively cell proliferation, apoptosis or cell cycle arrest in the lung parenchyma (Supplementary Fig. 2B–D). Taken together these findings provide evidence that Erk1 kinase depletion is not sufficient to rescue either the BRAFV600E-dependent lethality or BRAFV600E-driven tumor growth.
Acute BRAFV600E activation provokes an overall lymphocyte depletion which is not rescued upon ERK1 loss
To elicit an acute BRAFV600E expression, 7-week-old mice were administered TMX intraperitoneally. As previously described [15], the BRAFV600E strain, but neither the WT nor the Erk mice, started to appear sick 2–3 days post injection, displayed rapid weight loss, and needed to be sacrificed after 3–5 days (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 3A). However, 15 days after TMX treatment also Erk mice, but not the WT strain, started to die, confirming the evidence that the ubiquitous depletion of ERK1/2 kinases is lethal in adult mice [17]. Intriguingly, the BRAFV600E and Erk;BRAFV600E mice showed undistinguishable viability phenotypes upon TMX administration, suggesting that BRAFV600E is epistatic over the constitutive Erk1 loss and the Erk2 conditional depletion. These findings also suggest that Erk1 lack is not able either to rescue or ameliorate the acute BRAFV600E-induced sickness, including the immediate weight loss and the early lethality (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B). PCR experiments confirmed Cre-dependent rearrangement of BRAFV600E allele upon TMX treatment, resulting in the effective BRAFV600E activation (Supplementary Fig. 3C). Interestingly, BRAFV600E activation also resulted in a drastic decrease in both the number of circulating lymphocytes, but not other white blood cells (WBCs) (Supplementary Fig. 3D), and in spleen size compared to Erk and WT strains (Fig. 2B, C). Furthermore, double immunostainings for the detection of CD3+ and CD45R+ lymphocytes confirmed that the BRAFV600E-induced spleen size reduction was ascribable, at least in part, to the depletion of both B- and T-lymphocytes (Fig. 2D, Supplementary Fig. 3E). Importantly, such an acute blood and splenic lymphocyte depletion cannot be restored by the constitutive Erk1 loss, thus suggesting that Erk1 is dispensable for BRAFV600E-driven acute lymphocyte toxicity (Fig. 2B–D). Similarly, regardless the presence of Erk1, BRAFV600E-challenged mice also display a drastic decrease in the number of lung B-, T-helper, T-cytotoxic and T-regulatory lymphocytes, as revealed by the corresponding markers, CD45R, CD4 [23, 24], CD8 [25, 26] and FOXP3 [27, 28], thus further supporting the notion that BRAFV600E results in an overall depletion of lymphocytes in an Erk1-independent fashion (Fig. 2E–H). Importantly, blood and lung lymphocyte depauperation, as well as spleen weight reduction, are not observed in age-matched untreated mice harboring the same genotypes, thus suggesting that such phenotypes are specifically ascribable to an acute, but not chronic, BRAFV600E expression and occur within few days after TMX treatment (Fig. 2I, J, Supplementary Fig. 4A, B). Altogether, these data strongly suggest that ERK1 is dispensable for the rapid BRAFV600E-mediated general lymphocyte loss.
Genetic and molecular dissection of ERK1/2 role in BRAFV600E-dependent cell toxicity in splenic lymphocytes
To better understand how acute BRAFV600E expression rapidly culminates in a drastic loss of spleen cellularity, we first asked whether such a cell toxicity might be mediated by ERK1/2 phosphorylation alteration. For this purpose, WB analysis from spleen total protein extracts revealed that in both Erk and Erk;BRAFV600E mice, albeit ERK1 was not detectable, ERK2 protein levels were significantly reduced by 25–30% compared to WT strain (Fig. 3A). These data indicate that at the specific time-point analyzed (Fig. 2A), the Cre-dependent Erk2lox/lox gene inactivation resulted in a partial, and yet statistically significant, reduction of ERK2 total protein levels (See Discussion). In line with this, immunohistochemistry experiments showed that total ERK1/2 protein is drastically reduced in the white pulp (WP) zone of Erk and Erk;BRAFV600E mice compared to controls (Fig. 3B). Unexpectedly, even though BRAFV600E activation resulted in no apparent change in ERK1/2 phosphorylation in either Erk;BRAFV600E or BRAFV600E mice compared to control strains (Fig. 3A), immunostaining experiments revealed that, upon BRAFV600E activation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was significantly increased in the red pulp (RP) and decreased in the WP zone (Supplementary Fig. 5A; Fig. 3C). Thus, these findings suggest that the BRAFV600E-induced cytotoxic response in splenic lymphocytes is associated to an overall reduction of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the WP. Remarkably, constitutive Erk1 loss, coupled to 25–30% ERK2 protein level reduction, is sufficient to promote a drastic increase in Ki67+ WP cells, giving rise even to high density proliferative centers (Fig. 3D). However, such proliferation stimulation is completely rescued upon BRAFV600E expression, even in Erk1−/− background, thus suggesting that such proliferation alteration is not the main cause of BRAFV600E-triggered splenic lymphocyte depletion, and that upon BRAFV600E activation, ERK1 becomes dispensable for the BRAFV600E-driven phenotype on lymphocytes proliferation (Fig. 3D). Conversely, no changes in p21CIP1 expression upon either ERK1 loss or BRAFV600E-activation were observed, thus ruling out the possibility that cell cycle arrest might play a role in BRAFV600E-dependent splenic lymphocyte depletion (Fig. 3E). Nevertheless, albeit BRAFV600E-expression results in robust DNA damage response (DDR) and apoptosis in the WP (Fig. 3F, G), the total and partial depletion of respectively ERK1 and ERK2 fully rescue BRAFV600E-dependent DDR and cell death induction, thus collectively suggesting that the immediate BRAFV600E-triggered splenic cell loss is not due to either proliferation inhibition, cell cycle arrest or cell death of resident splenic lymphocytes. Next, we set to identify the specific lymphocyte populations susceptible to the BRAFV600E-mediated cell response described in Fig. 3. For this purpose, an array of double immunostaining experiments by using the lymphocyte markers CD45R, CD4, and CD8 combined with Ki67, revealed that the proliferation cue elicited by ERK1/ERK2 depletion specifically encompasses B-, but not T-cells (Fig. 4A–C). However, BRAFV600E-activation, even in the Erk1−/− background, fully rescues the proliferation increase observed in B-lymphocytes induced by loss of Erk1/2, thus indicating that residual ERK2 is sufficient to accomplish such a decrease in cell proliferation upon BRAFV600E activation (Figs. 4A–C and 2D). Furthermore, additional double immunohistochemistry experiments with the above-mentioned lymphocyte markers in combination with γH2AX or CC3 also showed that, while BRAFV600E-activation induces an overall DDR activation in CD45R+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells, which is promptly rescued upon loss of ERK1/2 (Fig. 4D–F), only CD45R+ and CD4+, but not CD8+, lymphocytes show a significant increase of oncogene-induced cell death, which is reverted in an Erk1/2-dependent manner (Fig. 4G–I). Collectively, these findings strongly suggest that BRAFV600E-challenge effects over splenic lymphocytes are cell-specific and the impact of Erk1/2 loss in the BRAFV600E-triggered phenotypes is dependent on the specific biological function.
Genetic and molecular dissection of ERK1/2 role in BRAFV600E-dependent cell toxicity in Club cells
We recently provided evidence that acute BRAFV600E-expression induces cytotoxicity in several lung cellular types, including CCs [15]. To unravel the role of ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation in these BRAFV600E-induced phenotypes in the lung, we first performed both WB and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses. These experiments revealed that in Erk and Erk;BRAFV600E mice, albeit ERK1 was undetectable and ERK2 protein level is unaltered compared to WT strain, global ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the lung is significantly reduced only in Erk mice compared to WT strain (Fig. 5A–D; Supplementary Fig. 5B). In line with this, BRAFV600E activation resulted in a dramatic increase in ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation, in both Erk;BRAFV600E and BRAFV600E mice compared to control strain (Fig. 5A, C, D). Importantly, BRAFV600E-dependent ERK2 phosphorylation increase in Erk;BRAFV600E mice is comparable to that one observed in the presence of ERK1 (Fig. 5A, E), thus suggesting that ERK1 depletion is not counterbalanced by any relative over-compensation in ERK2 phosphorylation upon BRAFV600E-induction. These data also suggest that the solely phospho-ERK2 amount is sufficient to fully propagate downstream the BRAFV600E-triggered cytotoxic effect in the lung (see below). Next, to determine the role of ERK1/2 in BRAFV600E-induced CCs toxicity [15], we performed an array of immunostaining experiments by using the specific CC marker CC10 (CCs secretory protein 10 KDa) combined with either Ki67, P21CIP1 and γH2AX as well as the SPC ATII marker. These analyses confirmed that BRAFV600E-activation results in proliferation stimulation, DDR induction, cell cycle arrest, and CC-to-ATII transdifferentiation [15] (Fig. 5F–G). Remarkably, the constitutive Erk1 ablation is not capable of quenching the oncogenic-induced response, thus strongly suggesting that ERK1 is dispensable for the BRAFV600E-triggered cytotoxicity in CCs (Fig. 5F–G).
Impact of combined genetic and chemical inhibition of ERK1/2 on BRAFV600E-induced phenotypes in the lung
At their end-point TMX-treated Erk, BRAFV600E mice display mild or no alterations in ERK2 total protein levels (Figs. 3A and5A, C). Thus, in order to accomplish a significant inhibition of ERK2 activity, which would allow us to address the impact of the complete inhibition of both ERK1/ERK2 on BRAFV600E-dependent responses, we administered TMX-treated Erk;BRAFV600E mice the selective ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib (BVD-523; VRT752271) (Fig. 6A). Intriguingly, albeit even a combined ERK1/2 genetic and chemical inhibition failed to ameliorate the acute BRAFV600E-induced lethality (Fig. 6B), ulixertinib, but not placebo, treatment fully rescued the BRAFV600E-dependent loss of blood lymphocytes (Fig. 6C, Supplementary Fig. 6A, B), without affecting other WBCs (Supplementary Fig. 6C–J). These findings suggest that at such a dosage, ERK2 chemical inhibition can only partially inhibit the dramatic effects of the BRAFV600E-mediated ubiquitously activated ERK-signaling. However, WB analysis from lung protein extracts of WT, Erk and Erk;BRAFV600E mice revealed that upon ulixertinib treatment, whereas phosphorylated fraction of the ERK target RSK is significantly decreased, ERK1/2 phosphorylated fractions are paradoxically increased concomitantly to a significant reduction of total protein ERK1/2 levels compared to the placebo-treated groups, which are three known consequences of ulixertinib-mediated ERK inhibition [29,30,31,32,33,34] (Fig. 6D–F, Supplementary Fig. 6K–M). These data indicate that, at least in the lung, ERK2 chemical inhibition is efficiently accomplished. As a consequence of that, BRAFV600E-triggered toxicity in CCs, such as proliferation stimulation, DDR activation, apoptosis induction, and CC-to-SPC transdifferentiation, is completely abrogated in TMX-treated Erk, BRAFV600E mice upon ulixertinib, but not placebo, administration, therefore strongly suggesting that ERK2 is sufficient to propagate the aberrant BRAFV600E-signaling resulting in CCs toxicity (Fig. 6G–J, Supplementary Fig. 7A–D). Surprisingly, as shown in Fig. 7A–D and Supplementary Fig. 7E–H, the overall loss of pulmonary lymphocytes observed in BRAFV600E and Erk;BRAFV600E mice is not rescued even following treatment with either ulixertinib or the corresponding placebo, therefore indicating that the combined ERK1/2 genetic and chemical inhibition is not sufficient to restore the physiological levels of lung lymphocytes. Interestingly, additional double immunostaining experiments of either CD3 or CD45R markers combined with γH2AX also revealed that in the absence of ERK-chemical inhibition, lymphocytes from Erk;BRAFV600E strain display robust DDR activation compared to the corresponding cells from Erk mice. These findings suggest that, similarly to CCs, ERK1 is dispensable for the BRAFV600E-mediated γH2AX enrichment for lung lymphocytes as well (Supplementary Fig. 8A, B). However, contrary to what observed in CCs, even upon ulixertinib/placebo treatments, pulmonary parenchyma as well as both lung B- and T-lymphocytes from Erk;BRAFV600E mice still showed significantly higher levels of DNA damage compared to Erk strain (Supplementary Fig. 9A–D, Fig. 7E, F), therefore indicating that the ability of ERK1/2 chemical inhibition to prevent BRAFV600E from yielding DDR activation is cell-specific. Intriguingly, albeit both the ulixertinib- and the placebo-treated Erk;BRAFV600E mice showed increased levels of p21CIP1, but not of CC3, in the lung parenchyma compared to Erk mice (Supplementary Fig. 9E–H), no induction of either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis was observed upon BRAFV600E expression in pulmonary B- and T-lymphocytes (Fig. 7G–L, Supplementary Fig. 10A–F). Such findings suggest that the non-rescuable BRAFV600E-dependent lymphocyte depletion is not ascribable to any alteration in either cell cycle progression or apoptosis of resident lung lymphocytes.
Discussion
In this report we uncovered the selective contribution of ERK1/ERK2 kinases in multiple BRAFV600E-driven responses in vivo (Fig. 8). We unveiled that, albeit ERK1 is dispensable for both BRAFV600E-induced lethality and the growth of BRAFV600E-driven tumors, it might play a role in lung adenoma initiation. Similarly to ERK1, in a skin tumor mouse model, it has been shown that MEK1 deletion partially inhibits papilloma development [35]. However, we do not rule out the possibility that a random activation of BRAFV600E might concomitantly occur occasionally with abrogation of ERK2. Consequently, such a hypothetical ERK2 inactivation might impair the early stages of adenoma development and result in a reduced number of lung tumors in the Erk;BRAFV600E mice.
Our evidence indicating that global phosphorylated ERK2 levels in the spleen remain unchanged in Erk;BRAFV600E and BRAFV600E models is very likely the result of the opposite effects that BRAFV600E expression has over ERK phosphorylation in the different splenic zones. More specifically, whereas BRAFV600E leads to an increase of phosphorylated ERK2 in the red pulp, it yields a significant reduction of ERK2 phosphorylation in the WP. Furthermore, we found that BRAFV600E activation rapidly results in splenic lymphocyte apoptosis. Thus, it is arguable that the reduction in ERK phosphorylation in WP following BRAFV600E activation might be ascribable to the dramatic loss of cellularity due to the oncogenic-dependent apoptosis.
We also unveiled that ERK1/ERK2 have different impacts on BRAFV600E-elicited phenotypes in lymphocytes. In fact, ERK1 systemic ablation, coupled to partial (~30%) ERK2 loss, robustly and specifically stimulates splenic B-lymphocyte proliferation only in the absence of BRAFV600E-activation. On the other hand, ERK1/2 loss is sufficient to prevent BRAFV600E-challenged cells from undergoing DDR activation and apoptosis in the WP zone (Fig. 8). These findings let us envisage that the ERK1/ERK2 contribution to the BRAFV600E-driven acute phenotypes in vivo is dynamic and varies on the basis of the cell type (see below), the specific biological function and the level of ERK-pathway activation.
The epistasis of BRAFV600E-activation over ERK2 depletion in several acute phenotypes is likely due to the fact that the time window compatible with mice viability is not sufficient to promote an efficient ERK2 deletion. Consequently, as ERK2 is an extremely stable protein [36], BRAFV600E-activation may occur more rapidly than the ability of mouse cells to degrade the residual ERK2 molecules produced before Cre-mediated Erk2 gene disruption. Hence, in this time window also in Erk;BRAFV600E mice, BRAFV600E may ensure an efficient cue propagation downstream. In line with this notion, our experiments in the spleen show that 6 days post-TMX injections, whereas BRAFV600E allele has been efficiently activated, Cre-dependent Erk2lox/lox gene inactivation only resulted in a ~25% reduction of ERK2 total protein levels.
When expressed in the hematopoietic progenitors by using the interferon-inducible Mx-promoter-driven Cre, BRAFV600E provokes splenomegaly [7, 37] and hairy cell leukemia-like disease in mice [37]. However, this blood cancer phenotype becomes apparent only several weeks after BRAFV600E-activation and induces no decrease in lymphocyte number [37]. Thus, it is arguable that the rapid BRAFV600E-triggered lymphocyte depletion in our model might be ascribable to the BRAFV600E-provoked alteration of some intermediate phase(s) involving lymphocyte development or to the effects of BRAFV600E-expression in some cell type(s) necessary for lymphocyte homeostasis (see below). Moreover, the discrepancy observed in the BRAFV600E-dependent phenotypes in lymphocytes between our model and those ones described [7, 37] might depend on the different promoters employed to drive Cre-expression as well as on the method for Cre induction. Indeed, a ubiquitin promoter-driven Cre activation might result in BRAFV600E-expression also in cellular types that are unresponsive to Mx-promoter-driven [7] Cre basal activation. Furthermore, an acute TMX-mediated Cre activation would also result in a more rapid and vigorous overall BRAFV600E-activation, which might give rise to such previously uncharacterized phenotypes.
Although upon antigenic overstimulation, ERK-pathway activation promotes cell cycle arrest in lymphocytes in vitro by eliciting p21CIP1 expression [38, 39] in the absence of apoptosis induction [38], the ERK1/ERK2 contribution in BRAFV600E-mediated ERK-pathway aberrant activation in lymphocytes has yet to be elucidated. Here we disclosed that ubiquitous BRAFV600E acute activation provokes an immediate overall depletion of blood, splenic, and lung lymphocytes. Such a lymphocyte loss occurs independently of ERK1, does not rely on either p21CIP1-induced cell cycle arrest or CC3-mediated apoptosis, and is partially unresponsive to ERK1/2 chemical inhibition.
Importantly, BRAFV600E lesion is known to cause 100% of the cases of B-cell hairy cell leukemia [1, 40, 41] and has been found in other B- or T-cell malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic [42] and prolymphocytic [42] leukemias, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [43], diffuse large B cell lymphoma [44] and multiple myeloma [44]. Thus, altogether, our findings provide useful insights into the comprehension of the pathophysiology of a plethora BRAFV600E-driven malignancies [1,2,3,4, 45], including the above-mentioned blood cancers. Additionally, the use of Erk;BRAFV600E model in combination with tissue-specific promoters will be a valuable tool in vivo to genetically dissect the ERK1/2 selective contribution in cancer development in a variety of BRAFV600E-driven tumor murine models [7, 8, 10,11,12,13,14].
Ulixertinib is currently being tested in clinical trials [46], and its use for the treatment of mutant BRAF-triggered malignancies is promising [32, 47]. However, to date, the impact of ulixertinib on systemic BRAFV600E-triggered acute phenotypes in vivo is unknown. We showed for the first time in vivo that, albeit ERK1 is dispensable for the BRAFV600E-triggered cytotoxicity in CCs [15], ERK2 chemical inhibition fully abrogates these detrimental effects in bronchial cells (Fig. 8). Conversely, we also revealed that ulixertinib does not attenuate BRAFV600E-mediated DDR activation in lung lymphocytes even in the absence of ERK1. These findings may indicate that the impact of the genetic and chemical ERK1/2 inhibition on BRAFV600E-triggered DNA damage in vivo is dictated by the sensitivity of a specific cellular type to ERK-pathway abrogation. Alternatively, the unresponsiveness to the ERK inhibition of BRAFV600E-elicited DDR activation in lymphocytes might also underlie the existence of a potential ERK1/2-independent mechanism for BRAFV600E in the DDR induction in vivo. In support of this, recent work showed an ERK1/2-independent role for BRAF in the DDR [48, 49] in vitro.
The evidence that ulixertinib does not affect either the early lethality or lung lymphocyte depletion upon BRAFV600E-activation let us hypothesize that the drug posology used for the treatment may not be sufficient to rescue some acute BRAFV600E-dependent phenotypes. Thus, it is conceivable that such level of ERK-inhibition might not be capable of restoring some BRAFV600E-challenged upstream cellular processes for which ERK-pathway physiologically plays a crucial role, such as lymphocyte activation [50], survival [51], development [52, 53], differentiation [54, 55] or maturation [18, 56] which would culminate in lymphocyte loss. Further studies will be required to identify which lymphocyte maturation step is most affected by BRAFV600E activation.
Collectively, our data let us envisage the existence of unexplored efficacy limitations as well as previously uncharacterized heterogeneous outcomes to ulixertinib treatment due, at least in part, to the diversity of cell-specific responses to ERK-chemical inhibition in vivo. Hence, our findings will provide helpful insights into the understanding of the consequences in vivo and the improvement of the novel ERK-pathway targeted anti-cancer therapies.
Materials and methods
Murine models
BRAFLSLV600E, Erk1−/−, and Erk2lox/lox mice were described previously [3, 6, 7, 17, 18, 57]. These mouse models were crossed with a mouse strain carrying ubiquitously expressed, TMX-activated recombinase, UBC-CreERT2 [16], to generate UBC-CreERT2/+, Erk2lox/lox, Erk1−/−; UBC-CreERT2/+;BRAFLSL_V600E/+ and UBC-CreERT2/+;Erk2lox/lox; Erk1−/−; BRAFLSL_V600E/+ mice. All mice were maintained at the Spanish National Cancer Research Center under specific pathogen-free conditions in accordance with the recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). All animal experiments were approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and by the Ethical Committee for animal experimentation (CEIyBA) (PROEX 106.7/20). We followed the Animal Research Reporting of in Vivo Experiments (A.R.R.I.V.E.) guidelines developed by the National Center for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). Both male and female mice, with mixed backgrounds, were used for the experiments.
Mouse treatments
The mice received intraperitoneal injections of 4-hydroxy TMX (Sigma H6278) (1 mg/injection, 3 injections, 1 injection per day for 3 consecutive days).
Ulixertinib (VRT752271, HY-15816, MedChemExpress) was resuspended at the concentration of 10 mg/mL in 5%DMSO, 40%PEG300, 5% Tween80 and 50% saline solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was administered 100 mg/kg by oral gavage twice a day (200 mg/kg/day), as previously described [58].
The phenotypical analysis of the TMX-administered mice treated with either placebo or ulixertinib was performed a day before (endpoint = day 4) compared to the experiments carried out in the mice treated only with TMX (endpoint = day 5, Figs. 2–5). The reason of this choice has been dictated by the observation that the Erk;BRAFV600E and BRAFV600E mice treated with both TMX and Placebo/ERKi display a shorter survival (Fig. 6B) and consequently, at Day 5 post treatment the vast majority of them were dead. By choosing Day 4 as an endpoint, we reached an ethically justifiable compromise which complies with FELASA and ARRIVE guidelines to limit animal suffering and simultaneously to allow the generation of samples scientifically suitable for the downstream phenotypical analyses.
Peripheral blood analyses
Blood was collected by intracardiac puncture using EDTA-containing tubes (Aquisel). Automated peripheral blood counts were obtained using an Auto Hematology Analyzer Model LaserCell (CVM) according to standard manufacturer’s instruction.
Immunohistochemistry analyses in tissue sections
Tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin wax, and sectioned at 5 mm. For histological examination, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, according to standard procedures as previously described [59,60,61,62]. CC3 Asp175 (Cell Signaling Technology 9661), CC10 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-9772), CD4 [15, 60, 63] (1:50, Clone D7D2Z, 25229, Cell Signaling Technology), CD8 [60, 62] (1:200, Clone 94A, CNIO Monoclonal Antibodies Core Unit handmade), prosurfactant protein C (millipore AB3786), p21 (291 H/B5, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), γH2AX Ser 139 (Millipore 05-636), PPERK Thr202/Tyr204 (Cell Signaling Tehcnology 9101), Ki67 (Cell Signaling 12202), total ERK1/2 (Abcam ab54230, ERK-7D8), F4-80 (ABD Serotec MCA497), CD3 [64] (undiluted, Roche, 2GV6, ref.790–4341); CD45R/B220 [65] (1:150, BD biosciences, 557390, RA3-6B2); FOXP3 [62, 66] (1:50, 221D, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), p53 (POE316A, CNIO Monoclonal antibodies facility homemade), antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry in tissue sections. The antibodies used to identify the different lymphocytes subpopulations were previously tested, validated, and used by us [15, 60, 62] after the proper testing and validation performed by the corresponding manufacturers [63,64,65,66]. Pictures were taken using Olympus AX70 microscope. The percentage of positive cells was identified by eye and the areas were calculated by ImageJ and Zen 3.1 (Zeiss) softwares.
Protein extract preparation and western blot
Protein extracts were obtained as follows: 45 mg of lung for each mouse (10 mg for papillomas) were mechanically homogenized in 20 µl/mg of lysis buffer (50 mM TrisHCl pH 7.5, 420 mM NaCl, 1% Triton, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), Pierce phosphatase inhibitor mini tablets (ThermoScientific), protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 100X (Sigma), in BERTIN Precellys 24 Lysis & Homogenization machine, incubated 30 min on ice in agitation, sonicated 10 s, centrifuged at 14,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. The recovered supernatant was passed through a 0.22 filter, aliquoted, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio‐Rad DC Protein Assay (Bio‐Rad). 40 µg of nuclear protein extracts were separated in SDS–-polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis. After protein transfer onto nitrocellulose membrane, the membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk or 5% BSA (for the detection of phosphorylated proteins) both resuspended in TBS-Tween 0.2% (TBT) and then incubated with the indicated antibodies diluted in TBT: monoclonal anti-actin 1:5000 (A5441, Sigma), anti-phospho Thr202/Tyr204 p44/42MAPK (ERK1/2) 1:1000 (Cell Signaling Technology 9101), anti-total ERK1 1:2500 (BD Pharmingen; 554100), anti-total ERK2 1:5000 (BD biosciences, 610103), anti-phospho p90RSK (pRSK) (Thr359/Ser363) 1:1000 (Cell Signaling, 9344), anti-RSK1/2/3 (total RSK) 1:1000 (Cell Signaling, 9355). Anti-phospho RSK and total RSK antibodies were incubated in 5%BSA in TBS-0.1%Tween and the corresponding WBs were washed with TBS-0.1% Tween. Antibody binding was detected after incubation with a secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase using chemiluminescence with ECL detection KIT (GE Healthcare) with Chemidoc (Biorad). For the quantification, protein‐band intensities were quantified by densitometric analysis with ImageLab software (Biorad). The total levels of each protein analyzed have been normalized versus actin and the mean of the specific protein/actin ratio deriving from at least 3 different replicates has been used to generate the chart as previously described [62, 67, 68].
PCR
DNA of tissue samples was extracted using Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl:Alcohol (Sigma). We determined Cre-mediated recombination by using the following PCR program: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 33 cycles of 94 °C denaturation for 25 s, 25 s annealing at 55 °C, elongation at 73 °C for 45 s, followed by a 4 min 73 °C elongation step with the following primes: Fw 5′-TGAGTATTTTTGTGGCAACTGC and Rev 5′-CTCTGCTGGGAAAGCGGC. This oligonucleotide primer pair hybridizes in intron 14 flanking the cassette insertion site. These conditions produce diagnostic PCR products of 185 bp for the wild-type BRAF and 308 bp for BRAFV600Ealleles and a 335 bp PCR product for the Cre-activated BRAFV600E allele. The samples were resolved in a 3% agarose gel and detected with GelDoc (BioRad) as previously described [69].
Quantification and statistical analysis
Immunohistochemistry quantifications were performed by direct cell counting by using Zen3.1 Zeiss, QPath 2.0 and Image J softwares Unpaired Student’s t-test (two-tailed), ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc correction, Log Rank test were used to determine statistical significance. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft® Excel 2016 and GraphPad/PRISM8 as previously described [70]. For animal studies no blinding/randomization was done/used. The number of mice per each experiment as well as the size of the experiments were obtained by performing power analysis.
Data availability
The datasets and other information that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Raw western blots are available in the Supplemental file.
References
Arcaini L, Zibellini S, Boveri E, Riboni R, Rattotti S, Varettoni M, et al. The BRAF V600E mutation in hairy cell leukemia and other mature B-cell neoplasms. Blood. 2012;119:188–91. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-368209.
Frasca F, Nucera C, Pellegriti G, Gangemi P, Attard M, Stella M, et al. BRAF(V600E) mutation and the biology of papillary thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15:191–205. https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-07-0212.
Ducreux M, Chamseddine A, Laurent-Puig P, Smolenschi C, Hollebecque A, Dartigues P, et al. Molecular targeted therapy of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919856494 https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835919856494.
Bustamante Alvarez JG, Otterson GA. Agents to treat BRAF-mutant lung cancer. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212566. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.212566.
Lavoie H, Therrien M. Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:281–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3979.
Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM, Grob JJ, Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Maio M, et al. The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma. J Transl Med. 2012;10:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-85.
Mercer K, Giblett S, Green S, Lloyd D, DaRocha Dias S, Plumb M, et al. Expression of endogenous oncogenic V600EB-raf induces proliferation and developmental defects in mice and transformation of primary fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11493–500. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2211.
Dankort D, Filenova E, Collado M, Serrano M, Jones K, McMahon M. A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors. Genes Dev. 2007;21:379–84. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1516407.
Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE Jr, et al. BRAF V600E cooperates with PTEN silencing to elicit metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:544–52.
Dhomen N, Reis-Filho JS, da Rocha Dias S, Hayward R, Savage K, Delmas V, et al. Oncogenic Braf induces melanocyte senescence and melanoma in mice. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.02.022.
Charles RP, Iezza G, Amendola E, Dankort D, McMahon M. Mutationally activated BRAFV600E elicits papillary thyroid cancer in the adult mouse. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3863–71. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4463.
Yamamoto M, Tanaka H, Xin B, Nishikawa Y, Yamazaki K, Shimizu K, et al. Role of the BrafV637E mutation in hepatocarcinogenesis induced by treatment with diethylnitrosamine in neonatal B6C3F1 mice. Mol Carcinog. 2017;56:478–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.22510.
Wang J, Kobayashi T, Floc'h N, Kinkade CW, Aytes A, Dankort D, et al. B-Raf activation cooperates with PTEN loss to drive c-Myc expression in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4765–76. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0820.
Carragher LA, Snell KR, Giblett SM, Aldridge VS, Patel B, Cook SJ, et al. V600EBraf induces gastrointestinal crypt senescence and promotes tumour progression through enhanced CpG methylation of p16INK4a. EMBO Mol Med. 2010;2:458–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201000099.
Bosso G, Lanuza-Gracia P, Piñeiro-Hermida S, Yilmaz M, Serrano R, Blasco MA. Early differential responses elicited by BRAFV600E in adult mouse models. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04597-z.
Ruzankina Y, Pinzon-Guzman C, Asare A, Ong T, Pontano L, Cotsarelis G, et al. Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:113–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.03.002.
Blasco RB, Francoz S, Santamaría D, Cañamero M, Dubus P, Charron J, et al. C-Raf, but not B-Raf, is essential for development of K-Ras oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:652–63.
Fischer AM, Katayama CD, Pagès G, Pouysségur J, Hedrick SM. The role of Erk1 and Erk2 in multiple stages of T cell development. Immunity. 2005;23:431–43.
Hardy RR, Li YS, Allman D, Asano M, Gui M, Hayakawa K. B-cell commitment, development and selection. Immunol Rev. 2000;175:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.017517.x.
Bleesing JJH, Fleisher TA. Human B cells express a CD45 isoform that is similar to murine B220 and is downregulated with acquisition of the memory B-Cell marker CD27. Cytom Part B - Clin Cytom. 2003;51:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.10007.
Stoller JK. Murray & Nadel’s textbook of respiratory medicine, 6th edition. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201504-251OT.
Rothenberg EV. Programming for T-lymphocyte fates: modularity and mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2019;33:1117–35. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.327163.119.
Sauer KA, Scholtes P, Karwot R, Finotto S. Isolation of CD4+ T cells from murine lungs: a method to analyze ongoing immune responses in the lung. Nat Protoc. 2007;1:2870–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.435.
Luckheeram RV, Zhou R, Verma AD, Xia B. CD4 +T cells: differentiation and functions. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:925135. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/925135.
Zhang N, Bevan MJ. CD8+ T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity. 2011;35:161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.07.010.
Reiser J, Banerjee A. Effector, memory, and dysfunctional CD8+ T cell fates in the antitumor immune response. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:8941260. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8941260.
Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141623.
Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Williams LM, Dooley JL, Farr AG, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor Foxp3. Immunity. 2005;22:329–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.01.016.
Roskoski R. Targeting ERK1/2 protein-serine/threonine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacol Res. 2019;142:151–68.
Shin M, Franks CE, Hsu KL. Isoform-selective activity-based profiling of ERK signaling. Chem Sci. 2018;9:2419–31.
Lebedev TD, Khabusheva ER, Mareeva SR, Ivanenko KA, Morozov AV, Spirin PV, et al. Identification of cell type–specific correlations between ERK activity and cell viability upon treatment with ERK1/2 inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2022;298:1–16.
Germann UA, Furey BF, Markland W, Hoover RR, Aronov AM, Roix JJ, et al. Targeting the MAPK signaling pathway in cancer: promising preclinical activity with the novel selective ERK1/2 inhibitor BVD-523 (ulixertinib). Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16:2351–63.
Jiang H, Xu M, Li L, Grierson P, Dodhiawala P, Highkin M, et al. Concurrent HER or PI3K inhibition potentiates the antitumor effect of the ERK inhibitor ulixertinib in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:2144–55.
Houles T, Lavoie G, Nourreddine S, Cheung W, Vaillancourt-Jean É, Guérin CM, et al. CDK12 is hyperactivated and a synthetic-lethal target in BRAF-mutated melanoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1–16.
Scholl FA, Dumesic PA, Barragan DI, Harada K, Charron J, Khavari PA. Selective role for Mek1 but not Mek2 in the induction of epidermal neoplasia. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3772–8.
Buscà R, Pouysségur J, Lenormand P. ERK1 and ERK2 map kinases: specific roles or functional redundancy? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:1–23.
Chung SS, Kim E, Park JH, Chung YR, Lito P, Hu W, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell origin of BRAFV600E mutations in hairy cell leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:238ra71 https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008004.Hematopoietic.
Ohtsuka S, Ogawa S, Wakamatsu E, Abe R. Cell cycle arrest caused by MEK/ERK signaling is a mechanism for suppressing growth of antigen-hyperstimulated effector T cells. Int Immunol. 2016;28:547–57.
Chen D, Heath V, O’Garra A, Johnston J, McMahon M. Sustained activation of the raf-MEK-ERK pathway elicits cytokine unresponsiveness in T cells. J Immunol. 1999;163:5796–805.
Tiacci E, Trifonov V, Schiavoni G, Holmes A, Kern W, Martelli MP, et al. BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2305–15.
Ahmadzadeh A, Shahrabi S, Jaseb K, Norozi F, Shahjahani M, Vosoughi T, et al. BRAF mutation in hairy cell leukemia. Oncol Rev. 2014;8:22–5.
Langabeer SE, Quinn F, O'brien D, McElligott AM, Kelly J, Browne PV, et al. Incidence of the BRAF V600E mutation in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and prolymphocytic leukaemia. Leuk Res. 2012;36:483–4.
Lee JW, Yoo NJ, Soung YH, Kim HS, Park WS, Kim SY, et al. BRAF mutations in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1958–60.
Machnicki MM, Stoklosa T. BRAF - a new player in hematological neoplasms. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2014;53:77–83.
Yan N, Guo S, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Shen S, Li X. BRAF-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment status and future perspective. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1–10.
Drosten M, Barbacid M. Targeting the MAPK pathway in KRAS-driven tumors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:543–50.
Sullivan RJ, Infante JR, Janku F, Wong DJL, Sosman JA, Keedy V, et al. First-in-class ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib (BVD-523) in patients with MAPK mutant advanced solid tumors: results of a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:184–95.
Colomer C, Margalef P, Villanueva A, Vert A, Pecharroman I, Solé L, et al. IKKα kinase regulates the DNA damage response and drives chemo-resistance in cancer. Mol Cell. 2019;75:669–682.e5.
Margalef P, Colomer C, Villanueva A, Montagut C, Iglesias M, Bellosillo B, et al. BRAF-induced tumorigenesis is IKK a -dependent but NF- k B – independent. Sci Signal. 2015;8:1–13.
Ma P, Magut M, Faller DV, Chen C. The role of Ras in T lymphocyte activation. Cell Signal. 2002;14:849–59.
Reilly LAO, Kruse EA, Puthalakath H, Kelly PN, Huang DCS, Strasser A. MEK/ERK-Mediated phosphorylation of Bim is required to ensure survival of T and B lymphocytes during mitogenic stimulation. J Immunol. 2009;183:261–9.
Gold MR. B cell development: important work for ERK. Immunity. 2008;28:488–90.
Greaves SA, Peterson JN, Torres RM, Pelanda R. Activation of the MEK-ERK pathway is necessary but not sufficient for breaking central B cell tolerance. Front Immunol. 2018;9:707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00707.
Damasio MP, Marchingo JM, Spinelli L, Hukelmann JL, Cantrell DA, Howden AJM. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway control of CD8+ T cell differentiation. Biochem J. 2021;478:79–98.
Yasuda T, Kurosaki T. Regulation of lymphocyte fate by Ras / ERK signals ND OS NO. Cell Cycle. 2008;4101:3634–40. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.23.7103.
Lee BI, Li WP, Hisert KB, Ivashkiv LB. Inhibition of interleukin 2 signaling and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)5 activation during T cell receptor-mediated feedback inhibition of T cell expansion. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1263–74.
Dankort D, Curley DP, Cartlidge RA, Nelson B, Karnezis AN, Damsky WE,Jr, et al. BrafV600E cooperates with Pten loss to induce metastatic melanoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41:544–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.356.
Bianchi E, Rontauroli S, Tavernari L, Mirabile M, Pedrazzi F, Genovese E, et al. Inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling prevents bone marrow fibrosis by reducing osteopontin plasma levels in a myelofibrosis mouse model. Leukemia. 2023;37:1068–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01867-3.
Bejarano L, Bosso G, Louzame J, Serrano R, Gómez-Casero E, Martínez-Torrecuadrada J, et al. Multiple cancer pathways regulate telomere protection. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:1–21.
Piñeiro-Hermida S, Martínez P, Bosso G, Flores JM, Saraswati S, Connor J, et al. Consequences of telomere dysfunction in fibroblasts, club and basal cells for lung fibrosis development. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1–18.
Garrido A, Kim E, Teijeiro A, Sánchez Sánchez P, Gallo R, Nair A, et al. Role in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2022;76:850–61.
Piñeiro-Hermida S, Bosso G, Sánchez-Vázquez R, Martínez P, Blasco MA. Telomerase deficiency and dysfunctional telomeres in the lung tumor microenvironment impair tumor progression in NSCLC mouse models and patient-derived xenografts. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30:1585–1600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-023-01149-6.
Fang W, Zhou T, Shi H, Yao M, Zhang D, Qian H, et al. Progranulin induces immune escape in breast cancer via up-regulating PD-L1 expression on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and promoting CD8+ T cell exclusion. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-020-01786-6.
Rothermel LD, Sabesan AC, Stephens DJ, Chandran SS, Paria BC, Srivastava AK, et al. Identification of an immunogenic subset of metastatic uveal melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:2237–49. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2294.
Bleesing JJH, Morrow MR, Uzel G, Fleisher TA. Human T cell activation induces the expression of a novel CD45 isoform that is analogous to murine B220 and is associated with altered O-glycan synthesis and onset of apoptosis. Cell Immunol. 2001;213:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/cimm.2001.1865.
Liu XF, Zhu XD, Feng LH, Li XL, Xu B, Li KS, et al. Physical activity improves outcomes of combined lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study and mouse model. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2022;11:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-022-00275-0.
Bosso G, Cipressa F, Moroni ML, Pennisi R, Albanesi J, Brandi V, et al. NBS1 interacts with HP1 to ensure genome integrity. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-2185-x.
Cipressa F, Morciano P, Bosso G, Mannini L, Galati A, Raffa GD. et al. A role for Separase in telomere protection. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10405. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10405.
Laguía O, Bosso G, Martínez-Torrecuadrada J, Míguez-Amil S, Fernández-Leiro R, Blasco MA. Protocol for the generation and purification of high-molecular-weight covalent RNA-DNA hybrids with T4 RNA ligase. STAR Protoc. 2024;5:102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2024.102930.
Bosso G, Cipressa F, Tullo L, Cenci G. Co-amplification of CBX3 with EGFR or RAC1 in human cancers corroborated by a conserved genetic interaction among the genes. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01598-5.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to the Comparative Pathology and Mouse Facility Units at CNIO.
Funding
MAB laboratory is funded by the European Research Council (ERC-AvG Shelterins GA882385). GB is a Juan de la Cierva (JdC) Incorporación post-doctoral fellow. This work was also supported by GB’s JdC–Incorporación (IJC2019-039502-I) MINECO fundings. OL is a Ph.D. student of MAB laboratory, with a doctoral fellowship PRE2021-100986 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and the European Union FSE+.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GB and MAB conceived the idea. GB and MAB designed the experiments. GB, ACCH, and SA performed the experiments. GB and MAB wrote the manuscript. OL and RS aided with mice treatments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All authors approved and directly participated in the planning and/or execution of the experiments and/or analysis of the data presented herein. The animal studies were conducted in accordance with the Animal Use Protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and by the Ethical Committee for animal experimentation (CEIyBA) (PROEX 106.7/20).
Consent for publication
All authors have provided their consent for publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bosso, G., Cintra Herpst, A.C., Laguía, O. et al. Differential contribution for ERK1 and ERK2 kinases in BRAFV600E-triggered phenotypes in adult mouse models. Cell Death Differ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-024-01300-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-024-01300-x