Abstract
Mutations in presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) cause autosomal dominant familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD). Ferroptosis has been implicated as a mechanism of neurodegeneration in AD since neocortical iron burden predicts Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression. We found that loss of the presenilins dramatically sensitizes multiple cell types to ferroptosis, but not apoptosis. FAD causal mutations of presenilins similarly sensitizes cells to ferroptosis. The presenilins promote the expression of GPX4, the selenoprotein checkpoint enzyme that blocks ferroptosis by quenching the membrane propagation of lethal hydroperoxyl radicals. Presenilin γ-secretase activity cleaves Notch-1 to signal LRP8 expression, which then controls GPX4 expression by regulating the supply of selenium into the cell since LRP8 is the uptake receptor for selenoprotein P. Selenium uptake is thus disrupted by presenilin FAD mutations, suppressing GPX4 expression. Therefore, presenilin mutations may promote neurodegeneration by derepressing ferroptosis, which has implications for disease-modifying therapeutics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
While Aβ plaques pathologically define Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a causal role for this peptide in instigating neurodegeneration remains contentious [1]. Familial AD (FAD) is an aggressive autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations of presenilin (PS) 1, PS2 or the amyloid-β (Aβ) precursor protein (APP), which are all involved in the generation of Aβ. PS is the catalytic subunit of γ-secretase, which cleaves APP to form Αβ [2]. Mutations often bias cleavage of APP to form longer, less soluble, 42- and 43-amino acid Aβ in preference to the more soluble 40 amino-acid peptide [3]. While the impact of PS mutations on increasing the ratio of Αβ42/40 has been highlighted as a signature of neurodegenerative toxicity [3], a systematic analysis of 138 familial PS mutations in vitro [4] revealed that the 42/40 ratio was not consistently elevated and, more tellingly, 90% of these mutations reduced activity, leading to lower production of Aβ 40 and 42, as observed in several other studies (e.g., [3,4,5,6,7]). This is consistent with a loss-of-function mechanism for disease pathogenesis, which is not surprising given the slim probability that more than 200 mutations scattered throughout the presenilin genes each causes disease by a common gain of function (i.e., increased Aβ42/40 ratio).
The basis of PS mutations conferring disease by causing a change in ratio of Aβ42/40 has therefore undergone renewed scrutiny. In addition to this “gain-of-toxic-function” model, it has been considered that PS mutations cause disease by loss-of-function. PS knockout is embryonically lethal by an uncertain mechanism [8]. Conditional inactivation of PS or another essential component of γ-secretase, nicastrin, caused neurodegeneration, inflammation and tau hyperphosphorylation in mice, despite lower Aβ production [9,10,11]. Knock-in of L435F or C410Y familial PS1 mutations that cause complete loss of both γ-secretase activity and Aβ generation [12, 13] caused neurodegeneration in mice similar to that of the conditional PS1/2 knockouts [14, 15]. A common mouse model, the APP/PS1 mouse, expresses the Swedish mutation of APP together with the ΔE9 truncated mutation of PS1 [16], resulting in cognitive impairment despite reduced γ-secretase activity [17]. Finally, a γ-secretase-inhibitor caused accelerated cognitive decline and other intolerable side effects that resulted in the early termination of clinical testing in over 3000 AD patients [18]. Collectively, these findings indicate that PS mutations might confer AD risk by loss of γ-secretase function.
In addition to APP, PS also cleaves >150 Type I transmembrane proteins [19], including Notch-1. Dysregulation of the Notch pathway has been considered a possible culprit in neuronal loss in PS-mutation familial AD [20]. Reduction of Notch signaling is a common feature of PS mutations [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Loss of Notch is embryonically lethal [29] and Notch receptors (1–4) are vital for cell survival during embryonic development [30]. γ-secretase cleaves Notch to release the Notch intracellular domain (NICD), which translocates to the nucleus and binds RBPJκ (Recombination Signal Binding Protein For Immunoglobulin Kappa J Region) to form a transcription factor that regulates expression of genes involved in proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival [30]. Notch-1 is expressed by neurons in the adult brain and at particularly high levels in the hippocampus [31], which is affected early in AD. Reduced levels and activity of Notch-1 have been reported in hippocampal and cortical neurons isolated from sAD post-mortem brain tissue [32], consistent with reduced Notch-1 function in AD.
Brain iron accumulation with aging [33] is increasingly implicated in AD neurodegeneration [34, 35]. Brain iron levels, reflected by CSF ferritin [36,37,38,39], by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping-MRI [40], or directly measured post-mortem [34, 35], predict cognitive deterioration in AD. Derepression of ferroptosis has been implicated as the mechanism underlying the association between brain iron burden in AD and neurodegeneration [41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Ferroptosis is initiated by iron-mediated peroxidation of membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids into lethal lipid hydroperoxides, and cell death ensues when the checkpoint protection by the selenoprotein, glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), is overwhelmed [48,49,50]. Peroxidation of membrane lipids is a normal and constant cellular event but does not proceed to cell disruption and paracrine propagation because of GPX4 [51]. GPX4 requires selenocysteine within the active site of the enzyme [52]. Physiological cell-selenium supply involves uptake of selenoprotein P (SELENOP), via transmembrane receptors, LRP2 and LRP8 [53]. In neurons, the main receptor is LRP8, whose gene is a newly described Notch target [54]. GPX4 consumes glutathione (GSH) for activity, and GSH depletion (as happens in the brain in AD [55,56,57]) suppresses GPX4 activity and enables ferroptosis to proceed [49, 50].
Ferroptosis is readily harnessed in cell culture, where it is induced by GSH depletion (e.g., by erastin) [58] or GPX4 inhibition (e.g., by RSL3) [49] and selectively rescued by potent radical trapping agents (e.g., ferrostatin and liproxstatin, which are not developed for human use) [59, 60]. Using these models, we investigated the impact of PSs on ferroptosis. Loss of PS function, by knockout or by pathogenic mutation, derepresses ferroptosis. Notch-1 and LRP8 emerge as critical mediators of ferroptosis through impacting GPX4 expression.
Methods
Cell culture
HEK293 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA), HT22 cells (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia), or WT, PS KO and PS mutant MEFs (a kind gift of Prof. Bart De Strooper) were cultured in DMEM + GlutaMAX™-I supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Bovogen, France), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo, Australia), and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Thermo, Australia) at 37 °C, 5% CO2. All cell lines described above were routinely tested for mycoplasma (Cerberus Sciences, Australia).
All human iPSC experiments were conducted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Wollongong Human Ethics Research Committee (HE 13/299). The iPSCs used in this study were derived from dermal fibroblasts and have been previously described [61,62,63,64,65], with line details provided in (Extended Data Table 1). All iPSC cultures were maintained on MatrigelTM (Corning) coated 60 mm tissue culture dishes (Greiner Bio-One, Austria) in mTeSR-1TM medium (Stemcell Technologies, Canada) in a humidified incubator (Thermo, Australia) at 37 °C and 5% O2. The mTeSR-1TM medium was changed daily and colonies were passaged every 5–7 days with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) + EDTA (Life Technologies, USA). All iPSC lines were regularly tested in-house for mycoplasma.
The healthy control, sporadic AD and PS1 A246E FAD iPSCs were differentiated into neurons using growth factors via neurospheres, as described previously [63]. Data from the healthy control lines and sporadic AD lines were combined by disease status for analysis.
NGN2 lentiviral iPSC differentiation
The PS1ΔE9 FAD iPSCs and corresponding isogenic control were differentiated to neurons using NGN2 lentiviral transduction. Lentiviral particles were produced by co-transfection of the doxycycline-inducible lentiviral vector PLV-TetO-hNGN2-eGFP-PURO (NGN2; #79823, Addgene) or the reverse tetracycline transactivator vector FUW-M2rtTA (TTA; #20342, Addgene) by polyethyleneimine (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) and Opti-MEM (Life-Technologies) transfection of HEK293T cells and packaged using plasmids vSVG (#8454, Addgene), RSV (#12253, Addgene) and pMDL (#12251, Addgene), following established methods [63].
The day prior to seeding iPSCs for differentiation (Day-3), 24 well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Austria) were coated with 10 μg/mL poly-d-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) in DPBS for 30 min at room temperature. The poly-d-lysine was aspirated, and wells were washed 2× with DPBS before coating with 10 μg/mL laminin (Thermo, Australia) in DPBS overnight at 4 °C. Wells were washed 1× with DPBS before cells were seeded.
To seed iPSCs for differentiation (Day-2), cultures were single-cell passaged with DPBS + EDTA and accutase (Life Technologies, USA). Briefly, mTeSR-1TM medium was aspirated, cultures washed with DPBS + EDTA and then incubated in fresh DPBS + EDTA until colonies started to fragment. The DPBS + EDTA was aspirated, and the cultures were then incubated with accutase until they became single cells. DMEM/F12 was then added, the cells aspirated and then centrifuged for 5 min at 300 × g. The DMEM/F12 was aspirated, the cells were gently resuspended in mTeSR-1TM medium and cell concentration was determined with a hemocytometer. Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5–5.0 × 104 in each well of a 24-well plate in mTeSR-1TM medium supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632 (Focus Bioscience, Australia), then incubated overnight.
For lentiviral transduction (Day-1), the mTeSR-1TM medium was aspirated and replaced with fresh mTeSR-1TM medium supplemented with Y-27632 and containing the NGN2 and TTA lentiviruses at appropriate titer (1–2 μL/mL). Plates were incubated overnight.
For lentiviral induction (Day-0), 1 μg/mL doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) was added to neural induction media [Neurobasal medium (Thermo, Australia), 1× N-2 supplement (Thermo, Australia), 1× B-27 with vitamin A supplement (Thermo, Australia), 1× Insulin-transferrin-Selenium-A (Thermo, Australia), 1 × GlutaMAXTM (Life Technologies, USA)] supplemented with 10 μM SB431524 (Stemcell Technologies, Canada) and 0.1 μM LDN193189 (Stemcell Technologies, Canada). The mTeSR-1TM medium was aspirated, neural induction medium was added, and the plates incubated overnight.
Prior to puromycin selection (Day-1), plates were imaged using an Incucyte Zoom Imaging System (Essen Bioscience, USA) to confirm induction of lentiviral expression by doxycycline. The medium was aspirated and fresh neural induction medium containing doxycycline, SB431524, LDN193189 and 0.5 μg/mL puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) was added. The cells were incubated overnight, with this feeding regime continued with daily media changes until Day-4.
To commence the transition from neural induction medium to neuronal medium (Day-4), 25% (v/v) neuronal medium [BrainPhys Neuronal Medium (Stemcell Technologies, Canada), 1× N-2 supplement, 1× B-27 with vitamin A supplement] was combined with 75% (v/v) neural induction medium and supplemented with doxycycline and 10 ng/mL BDNF (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany). The neural induction medium was aspirated, transition medium was added, and the plates were incubated overnight.
To continue neuronal medium transition (Day 5), 50% (v/v) neuronal medium was combined with 50% (v/v) neural induction medium and supplemented with doxycycline and BDNF. The media was aspirated, fresh transition medium was added, and the plates were incubated for 48 h.
For inhibition of non-neuronal cell growth (Day 7), 2.5 μM Cytosine beta-d-arabinofuranoside hydrochloride, crystalline (AraC; Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) was added to 75% (v/v) neuronal medium combined with 25% (v/v) neural induction medium, supplemented with doxycycline and BDNF. The media was aspirated, fresh transition medium was added, and the plates were incubated for 48 h.
To complete neuronal medium transition (Day 9), the medium was aspirated and 100% (v/v) neuronal medium, supplemented with BDNF, was added. The plates were incubated for 48 h, and this feeding regime continued with half media changes every 48 h until day 22. Representative images of Neurogenin-2 induced human neurons [66] are shown in Extended Data Fig. 7.
To harvest neurons for use in experiments, the neuronal medium was aspirated, the cells washed 2× with DPBS and then mechanically detached into fresh DPBS. The cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 300×g, the DPBS aspirated, and the dry cell pellet stored at −80 °C.
Immunocytochemistry
For immunocytochemical preparations of iPSC-derived neurons, cells were fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 7 min, permeabilized with 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) in PBS for 10 min and then blocked in 10% (v/v) goat serum (Life Technologies, USA) in PBS for 1 h, with all incubations at room temperature. MAP2 primary antibody (1:100; Covance, USA) was incubated overnight at 4 °C, followed by the secondary antibody (1:1000 Life Technologies, USA) with nuclear counter stain Hoechst 33342 (1:1000; Life Technologies, USA) for 1 h at room temperature, with primary and secondary antibodies made in blocking solution. All coverslips were washed three times with 1× PBS between each step. Coverslips were mounted in Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Life Technologies, USA) and imaged within 1–2 weeks of staining. Images were captured using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope and acquired using Leica Application Suite - Advanced Fluorescence (LAS AF) 2.6.1–7314 software (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and representative images are shown in (Extended Data Fig. 8).
Cell viability assays
For cell viability assays, cells were seeded at 10,000 cells/well in 96-well culture plates. The following day, ferroptosis was induced for 24 hours using culture media supplemented with erastin or RSL3 (Selleckchem, USA), or rescued by co-culture with these ferroptosis inducers plus liproxstatin-1 (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) or seleno-l-cystine (Sigma Aldrich, Australia) at concentrations as specified. Cell viability was quantified using the MTT assay as previously described [67], except that formazan solubilization was performed in 100 μL DMSO after removal of all media.
Lipid peroxidation assay
BODIPYTM 581/591 undecanoic acid (C11) dye (BODIPY-C11; Thermo, Australia) was used as a probe to detect the level of lipid peroxidation. Oxidation of the polyunsaturated butadienyl portion of BODIPY-C11 shifts its emission peak from ~590 nm to ~510 nm which was detected by flow cytometry. The BODIPY-C11 sensor together with flow cytometry have been routinely used to measure the level lipid peroxidation [68, 69]. To detect lipid peroxidation following treatment with RSL3 (1 μM, 3 h), cells were treated with 0.125 μM BODIPY-C11 for an hour prior to harvesting with trypsin. Following centrifugation (800 × g, 5 min), cell pellets were washed twice with sorting buffer (1 × PBS, without Ca2+ or Mg2+, containing: 1 mM Na-EDTA, 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 1% (v/v) FBS and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin) and resuspended with ~200 μL of buffer containing DAPI to exclude dead cells from analysis. A CytoFLEX analyzer (Beckman Coulter) was used to detect a shift in fluorescence.
Plasmid purification
3XFlagNICD1 was a gift from Raphael Kopan (Addgene plasmid # 20183; http://n2t.net/addgene:20183; RRID:Addgene_20183) [70]. Puro-iNotch1IC was a gift from Danwei Huangfu (Addgene plasmid # 75338; http://n2t.net/addgene:75338; RRID:Addgene_75338) [71]. EX-Z9294-M03 (human LRP8 expression construct) was purchased from GeneCopoeia (USA). Following transformation, plasmid DNA was extracted from host bacteria using a DNA Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified by spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop (Thermo, Australia).
CRISPR-Cas9 knockout
Knockout cells were generated using the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) transfection method. Briefly, MEFs or HT22 cells were transfected by Nucleofection (Nucleofector™ 2b Device; Amaxa) with RNP complexes comprising a 1:1 molar ratio of Alt-R® S. pyogenes HiFi Cas9 Nuclease V3 (Integrated DNA Technologies; IDT) and duplexes of Alt-R CRISPR–Cas9 crRNA and Alt-R CRISPR–Cas9 tracrRNA-ATTOTM 550 (IDT). Gene-specific sequences of crRNAs used were: Psen1 GUAGUCCACGGCGACAUUGUGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCU; Psen2 CAUCUACACGCCCUUCACGGGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCU; Lrp8 – CUGCUCGGACAACAGCGACGGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCU; and Notch1 – GGUAUUCACGCCGUCCACACGUUUUAGAGCUAUGCU. 48 h following transfection, single-cell cloning was performed by the limiting dilution method in 96-well plates. Clones were selected in normal growth media additionally containing 400 nM liproxstatin and 800 nM α-tocopherol quinone to prevent loss of cells due to ferroptosis. 2-weeks later several clones of each KO were identified and expanded for further experiments. Control cells were transfected in parallel under identical conditions with RNPs constructed using negative control (NC) crRNA (murine; IDT). Surviving NC clones were pooled and used as the appropriate control line for the gene-specific knockout clones. Knockout was confirmed via western blotting with at least two different antibodies.
Plasmid and siRNA transfections
Transfection of plasmid constructs was performed via endocytosis of cationic liposomes using FuGENE HD Transfection Reagent (Promega, USA) at a 3:1 ratio of FuGENE Transfection 6 reagent per μg plasmid DNA. In all other respects, transfection was performed according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Similarly, transfection of human Notch1 Stealth siRNA or scrambled control siRNA (Thermo, Australia) was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Thermo, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Selection of Puro-iNotch1IC stable transfectants in PS dKO MEFs was achieved by selection in media containing 5 µg/mL puromycin.
Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of mRNA levels
RNA was extracted and converted to cDNA in one-step using a TaqMan™ Fast Advanced Cells-to-CT™ Kit (Thermo). Relative expression levels of mRNAs encoding the selected genes were measured according to the manufacturer’s protocol by RT-qPCR using specific TaqMan gene expression assays (Thermo, Australia), the following genes were analyzed on a ViiATM 7 Real-Time PCR System using MicroAmp Endura Plates with optical adhesive covers: Lrp8 (Cat. #: 4331182; Assay ID: Mm00474030_m1), Gpx4 (Cat. #: 4351372; Assay ID: Mm04411498_m1), Notch1 (Cat. #: 4331182; Assay ID: Mm00627185_m1) and β-actin (Cat. #: 4448489; Assay ID: Mm01205647_g1). The expression levels of Lrp8 were normalized to β-actin and calculated as fold-change vs WT by the 2–∆∆Ct method.
Cell lysis and protein extraction
For protein extraction, cells were disrupted with a cell scraper in a lysis buffer consisting of 50 mM HEPES-Na, pH 7.2, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) NP-40, 0.05% LDS and 1×Pierce EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo, Australia) in Milli-Q H2O and then vortexed. Supernatant was recovered following centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and protein was quantified using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo, Australia), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The protein fraction was precipitated in 4 volumes of acetone at −20 °C overnight and pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 minutes. Supernatant was discarded, and the pellets air-dried and resuspended at a concentration of 1–2 μg/μL in sample buffer consisting of 1× Bolt™ LDS sample buffer (Thermo, Australia), 1 × Pierce protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo, Australia), 1 × sample reducing agent (Thermo, Australia) in Milli-Q H2O.
SDS-PAGE and western blotting
Protein extracts were separated by 1D gel electrophoresis using NuPAGE 4–12% (w/v) Bis-Tris midi gels (Invitrogen, USA), and transferred onto PVDF membranes using an iBlot 2 transfer system (Invitrogen, USA), according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Immunoblots were performed to detect FLAG tag (1:1000, D6W5B, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), LRP8/APOER2 (1:2000; ab108208, Abcam, UK), β-ACTIN (1:5000, AC-15, Sigma-Aldrich, Australia), GPX4 (1:1000, ab125066, Abcam, USA), Notch1 (1:1000, D1E11, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), PS1 (1:1000, D39D1, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), or PS2 (1:1000, D30G3, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), SELENOP (B-9, Mouse mAb; sc-376858, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., USA), cleaved caspase 3 (Asp175; 1:1000, 5A1E, Rabbit mAb 9664; Cell Signaling Technology, USA), or cleaved caspase 7 (Asp198; 1:1000, D6H1, Rabbit mAb 8438) followed by appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, Thermo, Australia). Chemiluminescence was detected using Pierce ECL (Thermo, Australia) and visualized using the LAS-3000 Imaging System (Fujifilm, Japan) or Odyssey® Fc Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Representative blots for all proteins (including β-actin) are shown. Original western blots for all relevant figures are shown in “Supplementary Material—Original Blots”.
Elemental analysis/inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy
Cell pellets were digested in a minimal volume of concentrated nitric acid (Suprapur, Merck, Australia) overnight, followed by heating of the samples at 90 °C for 20 min to complete the digestion. The reduced volume after digestion (~20 μL) was diluted up to a final volume of 1 mL in Milli-Q water. Measurements of Se, Cu, Zn, Fe were made using an Agilent 8900 triple quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia) under operating conditions previously described [72]. The instrument was calibrated using blank, 10, 50, and 100 parts per billion (ppb) of a certified multi-element ICPMS standard solution (ICP-MS- CAl2–1, Accustandard, CT, USA). A certified internal standard solution containing 100 ppb of Yttrium via a T-piece was used as an internal control (ICP-MS- IS-MIX1-1, Accustandard, CT, USA). PBS and sample preparation blanks (containing Milli-Q water and nitric acid) were measured in each ICP-MS experiment to monitor for metal contamination. Data are expressed as μmol element/mg protein.
Statistics
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® 8.0/9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Dose–response data were modeled using non-linear curve fitting. Western blots were quantified by densitometric analyses using Fiji (ImageJ) software and Image StudioTM Lite 5.0 (LI-COR Biosciences) and standardized to β-actin. Differences between two groups were determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test and were considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, while differences between three or more groups were determined by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test of significance for multiple comparisons. The assumption of equal variances was validated by performing an F-test. Using the software package G*Power 3.1.9.7, the employed sample sizes were determined to provide adequate power (80–90%) to detect the relevant effect sizes (Cohen’s d) in each experiment. All experiments were replicated at least three times and results are expressed as mean ± S.D or S.E.M, as indicated in the figure legends; *,#P < 0.05. **,##P < 0.01. ***,###P < 0.001. ****,####P < 0.0001.
Results
Presenilins suppress ferroptosis
Using cultured mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), human fibroblasts and mouse hippocampal neuronal-derived cells (HT22) we assessed cell viability after exposure to erastin or RSL3 to induce ferroptosis. In MEFs, loss of presenilin 1 (PS1 KO) or presenilin 2 (PS2 KO) conspicuously increased sensitivity to both RSL3- and erastin-induced ferroptosis, which was further exacerbated when both genes were ablated (PS dKO) (Fig. 1a, b). Lethality was rescued in all conditions by co-incubation with liproxstatin-1, an inhibitor of ferroptosis (Extended Data Fig. 1a, b). Ferroptosis is characterized by an accumulation of lethal lipid peroxides. Basal lipid peroxidation (assessed by the selective sensor, C11-BODIPY 581/591) was elevated in the PS dKO relative to WT cells under control conditions, which was significantly exacerbated in PS dKO cells compared to WT when challenged with RSL3 for 3 h, an incubation time that precedes overt cell death (Extended Data Fig. 1c). RSL3-induced lipid peroxidation was blocked by co-incubation with either seleno-l-cystine (SEC2) or liproxstatin-1 (Extended Data Fig. 1c), concomitant with rescue from lethality (Extended Data Fig. 1a).
We tested whether the enhanced susceptibility to ferroptosis in the PS dKO MEFs could be rescued by complementation with wild-type human or familial AD mutant PS1. Wild-type human PS1 (wt hPS1) was able to rescue the ferroptosis susceptibility phenotype to near WT MEF values, but PS dKO cells expressing either of two different familial AD mutant forms of PS1 (L166P and I213T) remained more sensitive to ferroptosis (Fig. 1c, d), consistent with impaired function.
To ascertain whether increased ferroptosis sensitivity in PS-deficient cells was due to loss of γ-secretase function, we pre-incubated WT and PS dKO MEFs for 72 h with the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT prior to ferroptosis induction. Under these conditions, DAPT caused increased levels of the C-terminal fragments for APP and N-cadherin in WT, but not in PS dKO MEFs (Extended Data Fig. 2a, b), confirming the blockade of γ-secretase activity. As DAPT induced exaggerated sensitivity to both RSL3- and erastin- in WT but not PS dKO MEFs (Fig. 1e, f), these data are consistent with γ-secretase protecting against ferroptosis.
We studied the impact of endogenous FAD mutation using dermal fibroblasts derived from three related family members harboring the PS1A246E mutation. Indeed, fibroblasts from PS1A246E mutant carriers were significantly more susceptible to RSL3- or erastin-induced ferroptosis than age-matched healthy control fibroblasts (Fig. 1g, h) and in all cases were fully rescued with liproxstatin-1 (Extended Data Fig. 1d, e).
To assess whether disturbed PS function potentiates ferroptosis susceptibility in neuronal cells we used CRISPR-Cas9 technology to knockout PS1 (PS1 KO) or both PS1 and PS2 (PS dKO) in HT22 mouse hippocampal immortalized neuronal cells. An increased sensitivity to both RSL3 and erastin was observed in PS1, PS2, and PS1/PS2 KO HT22 cells compared to control cells transfected with non-specific sgRNA (Fig. 1i, j) and rescued by co-incubation with liproxstatin-1 (control, PS1 KO and PS dKO; Extended Data Fig. 1f, g), in concordance with the MEF and human fibroblasts results described above.
To determine if PS was merely protective against programmed cell death in general, we measured cell viability following treatment with well-characterized inducers of apoptosis. In contrast to the pronounced sensitization to ferroptosis by loss of PS (Fig. 1), neither PS dKO MEFs nor PS1 KO HT22 cells were more susceptible than WT controls to either staurosporine (Extended Data Fig. 3a, b) or camptothecin (Extended Data Fig. 3c, d). Interestingly, PS dKO MEFs were actually less sensitive to apoptosis (Extended Data Fig. 3a, c, e, fii, iii), which corroborates an earlier report by another group [73]. At the protein level, induction of ferroptosis was clearly distinguishable from the induction of apoptosis in WT and PS dKO MEFs by changes in levels of key proteins (Extended Data Fig. 3e, f). While no changes occurred in the levels of the apoptosis markers, cleaved caspases 3 and 7 (Extended Data Fig. 3e, fii, iii), erastin-induced a pathognomonic decrease in GPX4, which was most pronounced in WT cells that have high GPX4 relative to PS dKO cells (Extended Data Fig. 3e, fi). In contrast, camptothecin caused a pronounced increase in cleaved caspases 3 and 7 (Extended Data Fig. 3e, fii, iii), but no significant change in GPX4 (Extended Data Fig. 3e, fi). Thus, loss of PS sensitizes to ferroptosis but not apoptosis.
Presenilins promote GPX4 expression
To understand why PS-deficient cells are markedly susceptible to ferroptosis we examined GPX4, the selenoenzyme checkpoint for ferroptosis. GPX4 protein levels were ≈60% decreased in PS dKO MEFs compared to WT MEFs (Fig. 2a). This decrease in GPX4 was not due a decline in Gpx4 transcript expression as Gpx4 mRNA levels were unchanged (Extended Data Fig. 4). In induced basal cholinergic neurons derived from human iPSCs, we found that cells harboring the FAD point mutation PS1A246E, or the FAD deletion mutant PS1ΔE9, had conspicuous reductions in GPX4 compared to healthy age-matched controls (HC, Fig. 2b) or to isogenic CRISPR-corrected wild-type PS1 controls (Fig. 2c). Additionally, induced iPSC neurons from sporadic AD (sAD) patients expressed significantly less GPX4 than iPSC neurons from age-matched HC controls (Fig. 2b), indicating that a neuronal GPX4 lesion may be relevant to both familial and sporadic AD.
For its active site, GPX4 incorporates SEC, the 21st amino acid, via translational reprogramming involving its cognate tRNA (tRNASec) [74]. We found that PS dKO MEFs contain 71% less selenium than WT MEFs (Fig. 2d). Similarly, mutant PS1A246E neurons contained 39% less selenium and PS1ΔE9 iPSC neurons contained 17% less selenium than their respective controls (Fig. 2e, f), although selenium levels were not changed in neurons reprogrammed from cases of sporadic AD. Interestingly, despite a decrease in selenium in the FAD cells (Fig. 2e), there was no concomitant decrease in iron, copper and zinc levels (Extended Data Fig. 5d–f). However, in PS dKO MEFs there was a significant (p < 0.05) elevation in copper (31%; Extended Data Fig. 5b), and in PS1ΔE9 iPSC neurons we observed significant (p < 0.05) increases in both iron (26%) and zinc (23%; Extended Data Fig. 5g, i).
The reduced selenium levels in PS KO and mutant PS cells might account for their diminished GPX4 expression [52, 75]. Notably, GPX4 expression is also known to be decreased in a selenium-independent manner by ferroptotic stressors [76,77,78,79]. Considering this, the decrease of GPX4 (Fig. 2b) despite adequate selenium (Fig. 2e) in sAD induced neurons may reflect the presence of other sources of elevated ferroptotic stress relevant to AD (e.g., elevated redox-active iron, increased lipid peroxidation, decreased glutathione).
The main mechanism of selenium uptake in neurons is via the lipoprotein receptor LRP8, which binds to circulating SELENOP protein that serves as the principal selenium source (see below). Supplementing MEF cells with the organic selenium donor, SEC2, which bypasses the LRP8 uptake mechanism, induced a dose-dependent elevation of GPX4 in both WT and PS dKO MEFs (Fig. 2g), concomitantly suppressing lipid peroxidation (Extended Data Fig. 1c). Consistent with boosting GPX4 levels, SEC2 dose-dependently rescued cell viability following RSL3 intoxication of both WT and PS dKO cells (Fig. 2h).
LRP8 suppression markedly sensitizes cells to ferroptosis
LRP8 is known primarily as the cell surface receptor for Reelin, a large secreted neuronal glycoprotein with diverse functions in both the developing and adult brain, also implicated in the pathophysiology of AD [80]. LRP8 binding of SELENOP is the main pathway for selenium intake into neurons. Knockout of either Lrp8 or Selenop in mice reduces brain selenium by more than 50% and causes severe neurodegeneration [81]. Several FAD PS1 mutations have been reported to impair LRP8 processing and trafficking [82]. We found that LRP8 protein expression in PS dKO MEFs was >50% suppressed compared to WT MEFs (Fig. 3a). Suppression of LRP8 and GPX4 levels by loss of PS in MEFs and HT22 cells (Extended Data Fig. 6a, bi, iii) occurred concomitantly with a decline in cellular SELENOP levels (Extended Data Fig. 6a, bii), consistent with the decrease in LRP8 lowering cellular SELENOP and selenium.
We also observed dramatic LRP8 loss in mature induced iPSC basal cholinergic neurons derived from pathogenic PS1A246E and PS1ΔE9 mutation cases compared to controls (Fig. 3b, c). This reduction in protein was mirrored by a dramatic presenilin-dependent loss of Lrp8 mRNA as measured by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3d), consistent with transcriptional regulation of LRP8 being associated with presenilin. Thus, pathogenic presenilin mutations disturb LRP8-dependent selenium uptake into cells and consequently weaken the GPX4 ferroptosis checkpoint.
We tested the impact of loss of LRP8 on ferroptosis by CRISPR-Cas9 knock out of LRP8 in HT22 rat hippocampal neurons. The Lrp8 knockout (Lrp8 KO) HT22 cells were markedly more susceptible to ferroptosis induced by both RSL3 (Fig. 3e) or erastin (Fig. 3f). In a reciprocal experiment, transient transfection of human LRP8 in PS dKO MEFs, which are depleted of endogenous LRP8 (Fig. 3a, d), reversed the vulnerability to ferroptosis caused by the loss of PS (Fig. 3f). LRP8 overexpression induced GPX4 protein expression (Fig. 3g) and improved resilience against ferroptosis in PS dKO MEFs challenged with RSL3 (Fig. 3h) and, to a lesser extent, erastin (Fig. 3i).
Notch-1 signaling regulates susceptibility to ferroptosis
Notch-1 is a substrate of presenilin-dependent γ-secretase processing, and its intramembrane cleavage releases the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) [83], which translocates to the nucleus where it regulates transcription. Reduced LRP8 expression has previously been reported in the hippocampi of Notch-1 knockout mice [84]. We reasoned that, if LRP8 is modulated at the mRNA level by presenilin (Fig. 3d), it could be dependent upon Notch signaling.
We noted that Notch-1 expression in human-derived iPSC neurons with the PS1A24E mutation was <50% lower relative to age-matched healthy control (HC) and sAD iPSC neurons (Fig. 4a, b). We investigated the impact of Notch-1 knockdown in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells (chosen because a high degree of transient knockdown is readily achievable and because they express measurable amounts of Notch-1, LRP8, GPX4, and γ-secretase component proteins). Notch-1 suppression by siRNA induced a ~50% reduction in LRP8 and GPX4 expression (Fig. 4c, d). Confirming the siRNA effects, CRISPR knockout of Notch-1 in MEFs caused a >50% reduction in LRP8 and GPX4 expression (Fig. 4e, f) and sensitized cells to RSL3-induced ferroptosis (Fig. 4g) and erastin-induced ferroptosis (Fig. 4h).
We hypothesized that NICD might regulate LRP8 expression via its function as a transcription factor upon binding within the RPBJ complex following its translocation to the cell nucleus. To investigate this, we blocked RPBJ transcriptional activity with RIN1 (RPBJ INhibitor-1), a highly selective small molecule inhibitor [85]. Preincubation of WT MEF cells with RIN1 markedly decreased both LRP8 and GPX4 (Fig. 4i, j), consistent with disruption to Notch-1/NICD-dependent transcription of LRP8 and corresponding loss of GPX4. We surmised that loss of LRP8 leads to decresed selenium, as detected in PS dKO MEFs and FAD PS1 mutant iPSC neurons (as in Fig. 2d–f, respectively), and this loss of selenium decreases GPX4. Furthermore, impaired selenium uptake due to LRP8 depletion also suppresses the ability of the cell to synthesize more GPX4 to counteract lipid hydroperoxide stress. Indeed, inhibition of RPBJ in MEFs by RIN1 rendered the cells dramatically more sensitive to RSL3- and erastin-induced ferroptosis than vehicle-treated MEFs (Fig. 4k, l). To confirm that LRP8 expression was dependent on NICD, we transiently transfected NICD into MEFs. In reciprocal agreement with the Notch-1 siRNA, CRISPR knockout as well as the RIN-1 inhibitor results, overexpression of NICD promoted expression of LRP8 in MEFs (Fig. 4m, n). As stable expression of NICD in PS dKO MEFs restored Lrp8 mRNA to WT levels (Extended Data Fig. 4), the NICD-dependent increase in LRP8 protein expression is likely due to increased message.
Discussion
A growing body of evidence linking dysregulation of brain iron to AD progression [34,35,36,37,38,39,40] has implicated ferroptosis as a mechanism of neurodegeneration [86, 87]. In multiple cell types we demonstrated that genetic or pharmacological disruption of PS function sensitized cells to ferroptosis, but not apoptosis, which invites renewed interpretations for the role of PS in AD.
Familial PS mutations conferring loss of an essential or trophic function, such as ferroptosis suppression, is consistent with prior findings. For instance, conditional double knockout mice (cdKO) lacking both presenilin 1 and 2 in the postnatal mouse forebrain exhibit age-dependent neurodegeneration associated with hyperphosphorylated tau without the formation of Aβ plaques [88]. Furthermore, global expression of AD-causing PS1 mutations mimics the neurodegeneration observed in the PS1-KO mouse [14]. Such findings support the well-evidenced alternative theory that FAD PS mutations cause clinical disease via pathologic sequelae of a loss of PS function (e.g., γ-secretase activity) in vivo [14]. Based on the findings presented here, we predict that one of these sequelae is an increased sensitization to ferroptosis downstream of diminished levels of neuronal selenium and GPX4. This perspective is consistent with previous findings in PS cdKO mice of increased levels of cortical neuronal cell death [10, 89], and with the dysregulation of genes associated with ferroptosis pathways (e.g., GPX5, ACSL1, SLC38A2 [9]). Consistent with our prediction, previous studies [90,91,92] have shown that therapeutic elevation of selenium in 3xTg-AD mice, which express mutant PS1 in addition to mutant APP and tau, effectively combats hippocampal-dependent learning and memory impairments, as well as behavioral phenotypes.
This perspective of loss-of-essential-PS-function in FAD differs from the amyloid cascade hypothesis, which postulates that the primary effect of PS mutations in FAD is through a toxic “gain-of-function”, by favoring the over-production of purportedly neurotoxic Aβ42 species [93]. While there are some exceptions [7], most studies report that PS mutations reduce Aβ42 levels even if the ratio to Aβ40 is often, but not always, increased [4,5,6, 94]. It is unclear how a reduction in Aβ42 production observed with many PS mutations could cause FAD and new perspectives are warranted.
As mentioned above, dysregulated Notch signaling possibly contributes to neuronal loss in PS-linked familial AD [20]. For the first time, our findings indicate that Notch and LRP8 are critical for protecting against ferroptosis. As such, we propose that reduced Notch signaling (due to loss of PS function) contributes to neuronal dysfunction and death by ferroptosis in autosomal dominant PS-mutant carriers. Our findings indicate that both PS1 and PS2 regulate the LRP8-selenium-GPX4 axis via the Notch pathway (Fig. 5). The individual contributions of PS1 and PS2 to this machinery remain to be fully elaborated. In the absence of Notch, and thus the NICD produced by the γ-secretase, LRP8 expression is repressed [84], which we have here shown suppresses selenium and GPX4 levels, resulting in increased sensitivity to ferroptosis.
PS mutations commonly impair Notch processing [21], with some exceptions [94], but can also impair the trafficking of LRP8, which could also induce selenium deficiency in the absence of a Notch deficit [82]. Disruption to this axis could cause neurodegeneration by ferroptosis in AD, since neurodegeneration is a feature of mice lacking SELENOP or LRP8 [95], and of mice with conditional KO of GPX4 [96]. We demonstrate that decreased LRP8-mediated selenium uptake and GPX4 expression can be overcome by supplying non-SELENOP sources of selenium, such as SEC2 (Fig. 2g, h). Although SEC2-driven GPX4 expression was lower in PS dKO relative to WT cells (Fig. 2g), this is likely due to the lower basal selenium (Fig. 2d) and GPX4 (Fig. 2a, g) levels in PS dKO cells. Notably, the fold-increase of GPX4 from basal levels following SEC2 supplementation is similar between WT and PS dKO cells (Fig. 2g).
It is worth noting that in sAD induced neurons we observed a decrease in LRP8 (Fig. 3b), but no corresponding decline in selenium (Fig. 2e), which contrasts with the coupling of low LRP8 (Fig. 3b, c) and low selenium (Fig. 2e, f) in FAD PS-mutant induced neurons. The cell culture media of iPSC neurons contains some inorganic selenium (i.e., selenite) as an additive. While this was insufficient to rescue selenium in PS mutant induced neurons, which are severely deficient in selenium, it appeared sufficient to normalize selenium in non-PS mutant sAD cells. We hypothesize that in sAD induced neurons, unlike in PS mutant induced neurons, there is metabolic compensation for decreased LRP8 resulting in enhanced uptake of non-SELENOP-bound selenium.
Collectively, our studies demonstrate the potential for presenilin mutations to promote neurodegeneration irrespective of Aβ, which may or may not be an additional toxic lesion. Agents that rescue ferroptosis such as iron chelators, brain-accessible selenium treatments (not dependent on SELENOP), glutathione precursors and radical trapping agents may therefore have therapeutic potential for AD.
Data availability
The data analysed during this study are included in this published article and the supplemental data files. Additional supporting data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Ayton S, Bush AI. β-amyloid: the known unknowns. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;65:101212.
Lichtenthaler SF, Haass C, Steiner H. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis-lessons from amyloid precursor protein processing. J Neurochem. 2011;117:779–96.
Szaruga M, Munteanu B, Lismont S, Veugelen S, Horre K, Mercken M, et al. Alzheimer’s-causing mutations shift Aβ length by destabilizing γ-secretase-Aβn interactions. Cell. 2017;170:443–56 e414.
Sun L, Zhou R, Yang G, Shi Y. Analysis of 138 pathogenic mutations in presenilin-1 on the in vitro production of Aβ42 and Aβ40 peptides by γ-secretase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E476–E485.
Szaruga M, Veugelen S, Benurwar M, Lismont S, Sepulveda-Falla D, Lleo A, et al. Qualitative changes in human γ-secretase underlie familial Alzheimer’s disease. J Exp Med. 2015;212:2003–13.
Quintero-Monzon O, Martin MM, Fernandez MA, Cappello CA, Krzysiak AJ, Osenkowski P, et al. Dissociation between the processivity and total activity of γ-secretase: implications for the mechanism of Alzheimer’s disease-causing presenilin mutations. Biochemistry. 2011;50:9023–35.
Kwart D, Gregg A, Scheckel C, Murphy E, Paquet D, Duffield M, et al. A large panel of isogenic APP and PSEN1 mutant human iPSC neurons reveals shared endosomal abnormalities mediated by APP β-CTFs, not Aβ. Neuron. 2019;104:256–70.
Shen J, Bronson RT, Chen DF, Xia W, Selkoe DJ, Tonegawa S. Skeletal and CNS defects in Presenilin-1-deficient mice. Cell. 1997;89:629–39.
Beglopoulos V, Sun X, Saura CA, Lemere CA, Kim RD, Shen J. Reduced beta-amyloid production and increased inflammatory responses in presenilin conditional knock-out mice. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46907–14.
Wines-Samuelson M, Schulte EC, Smith MJ, Aoki C, Liu X, Kelleher RJ 3rd, et al. Characterization of age-dependent and progressive cortical neuronal degeneration in presenilin conditional mutant mice. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10195.
Tabuchi K, Chen G, Sudhof TC, Shen J. Conditional forebrain inactivation of nicastrin causes progressive memory impairment and age-related neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7290–301.
Heilig EA, Xia W, Shen J, Kelleher RJ 3rd. A presenilin-1 mutation identified in familial Alzheimer disease with cotton wool plaques causes a nearly complete loss of gamma-secretase activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:22350–9.
Heilig EA, Gutti U, Tai T, Shen J, Kelleher RJ 3rd. Trans-dominant negative effects of pathogenic PSEN1 mutations on γ-secretase activity and Aβ production. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11606–17.
Xia D, Watanabe H, Wu B, Lee SH, Li Y, Tsvetkov E, et al. Presenilin-1 knockin mice reveal loss-of-function mechanism for familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2015;85:967–81.
Xia D, Kelleher RJ 3rd, Shen J. Loss of Aβ43 production caused by presenilin-1 mutations in the knockin mouse brain. Neuron. 2016;90:417–22.
Huang H, Nie S, Cao M, Marshall C, Gao J, Xiao N, et al. Characterization of AD-like phenotype in aged APPSwe/PS1dE9 mice. Age. 2016;38:303–22.
Woodruff G, Young JE, Martinez FJ, Buen F, Gore A, Kinaga J, et al. The presenilin-1 ΔE9 mutation results in reduced γ-secretase activity, but not total loss of PS1 function, in isogenic human stem cells. Cell Rep. 2013;5:974–85.
Doody RS, Raman R, Farlow M, Iwatsubo T, Vellas B, Joffe S, et al. A phase 3 trial of semagacestat for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:341–50.
Güner G, Lichtenthaler SF. The substrate repertoire of γ-secretase/presenilin. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;105:27–42.
Woo HN, Park JS, Gwon AR, Arumugam TV, Jo DG. Alzheimer’s disease and Notch signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;390:1093–7.
Bentahir M, Nyabi O, Verhamme J, Tolia A, Horre K, Wiltfang J, et al. Presenilin clinical mutations can affect gamma-secretase activity by different mechanisms. J Neurochem. 2006;96:732–42.
Song W, Nadeau P, Yuan M, Yang X, Shen J, Yankner BA. Proteolytic release and nuclear translocation of Notch-1 are induced by presenilin-1 and impaired by pathogenic presenilin-1 mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:6959–63.
Steiner H, Duff K, Capell A, Romig H, Grim MG, Lincoln S, et al. A loss of function mutation of presenilin-2 interferes with amyloid beta-peptide production and notch signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:28669–73.
Moehlmann T, Winkler E, Xia X, Edbauer D, Murrell J, Capell A, et al. Presenilin-1 mutations of leucine 166 equally affect the generation of the Notch and APP intracellular domains independent of their effect on Abeta 42 production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:8025–30.
Baumeister R, Leimer U, Zweckbronner I, Jakubek C, Grunberg J, Haass C. Human presenilin-1, but not familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) mutants, facilitate Caenorhabditis elegans Notch signalling independently of proteolytic processing. Genes Funct. 1997;1:149–59.
Seidner GA, Ye Y, Faraday MM, Alvord WG, Fortini ME. Modeling clinically heterogeneous presenilin mutations with transgenic Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1026–33.
Amtul Z, Lewis PA, Piper S, Crook R, Baker M, Findlay K, et al. A presenilin 1 mutation associated with familial frontotemporal dementia inhibits gamma-secretase cleavage of APP and notch. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;9:269–73.
Walker ES, Martinez M, Brunkan AL, Goate A. Presenilin 2 familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations result in partial loss of function and dramatic changes in Abeta 42/40 ratios. J Neurochem. 2005;92:294–301.
Donoviel DB, Hadjantonakis AK, Ikeda M, Zheng H, Hyslop PS, Bernstein A. Mice lacking both presenilin genes exhibit early embryonic patterning defects. Genes Dev. 1999;13:2801–10.
Borggrefe T, Oswald F. The Notch signaling pathway: transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:1631–46.
Berezovska O, Xia MQ, Hyman BT. Notch is expressed in adult brain, is coexpressed with presenilin-1, and is altered in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57:738–45.
Brai E, Alina Raio N, Alberi L. Notch1 hallmarks fibrillary depositions in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:64.
Ward RJ, Zucca FA, Duyn JH, Crichton RR, Zecca L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:1045–60.
Ayton S, Portbury S, Kalinowski P, Agarwal P, Diouf I, Schneider JA, et al. Regional brain iron associated with deterioration in Alzheimer’s disease: a large cohort study and theoretical significance. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17:1244–56.
Ayton S, Wang Y, Diouf I, Schneider JA, Brockman J, Morris MC, et al. Brain iron is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer pathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:2932–41.
Ayton S, Faux NG, Bush AI, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I. Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer’s disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6760.
Ayton S, Faux NG, Bush AI. Association of cerebrospinal fluid ferritin level with preclinical cognitive decline in APOE-ε4 carriers. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:122–5.
Diouf I, Fazlollahi A, Bush AI, Ayton S. Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging I. Cerebrospinal fluid ferritin levels predict brain hypometabolism in people with underlying β-amyloid pathology. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;124:335–9.
Ayton S, Diouf I, Bush AI. Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging I. Evidence that iron accelerates Alzheimer’s pathology: a CSF biomarker study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89:456–60.
Ayton S, Fazlollahi A, Bourgeat P, Raniga P, Ng A, Lim YY, et al. Cerebral quantitative susceptibility mapping predicts amyloid-β-related cognitive decline. Brain. 2017;140:2112–9.
Ashraf A, Jeandriens J, Parkes HG, So PW. Iron dyshomeostasis, lipid peroxidation and perturbed expression of cystine/glutamate antiporter in Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence of ferroptosis. Redox Biol. 2020;32:101494.
Ashraf A, So PW. Spotlight on ferroptosis: iron-dependent cell death in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:196.
Bao WD, Pang P, Zhou XT, Hu F, Xiong W, Chen K, et al. Loss of ferroportin induces memory impairment by promoting ferroptosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:1548–62.
Derry PJ, Hegde ML, Jackson GR, Kayed R, Tour JM, Tsai AL, et al. Revisiting the intersection of amyloid, pathologically modified tau and iron in Alzheimer’s disease from a ferroptosis perspective. Prog Neurobiol. 2020;184:101716.
Lane DJR, Ayton S, Bush AI. Iron and Alzheimer’s disease: an update on emerging mechanisms. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64:S379–S395.
Yan N, Zhang J. Iron metabolism, ferroptosis, and the links with Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1443.
Yan HF, Zou T, Tuo QZ, Xu S, Li H, Belaidi AA, et al. Ferroptosis: mechanisms and links with diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:49.
Ursini F, Bindoli A. The role of selenium peroxidases in the protection against oxidative damage of membranes. Chem Phys Lipids. 1987;44:255–76.
Yang WS, SriRamaratnam R, Welsch ME, Shimada K, Skouta R, Viswanathan VS, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. 2014;156:317–31.
Friedmann Angeli JP, Schneider M, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Hammond VJ, et al. Inactivation of the ferroptosis regulator Gpx4 triggers acute renal failure in mice. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:1180–91.
Riegman M, Sagie L, Galed C, Levin T, Steinberg N, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis occurs through an osmotic mechanism and propagates independently of cell rupture. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22:1042–8.
Ingold I, Berndt C, Schmitt S, Doll S, Poschmann G, Buday K, et al. Selenium utilization by GPX4 is required to prevent hydroperoxide-induced ferroptosis. Cell. 2018;172:409–22.
Krol MB, Gromadzinska J, Wasowicz W. SeP, ApoER2 and megalin as necessary factors to maintain Se homeostasis in mammals. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2012;26:262–6.
Wang H, Zou J, Zhao B, Johannsen E, Ashworth T, Wong H, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved and divergent features of Notch1/RBPJ binding in human and murine T-lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14908–13.
Bermejo P, Martin-Aragon S, Benedi J, Susin C, Felici E, Gil P, et al. Peripheral levels of glutathione and protein oxidation as markers in the development of Alzheimer’s disease from Mild Cognitive Impairment. Free Radic Res. 2008;42:162–70.
Mandal PK, Saharan S, Tripathi M, Murari G. Brain glutathione levels-a novel biomarker for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78:702–10.
Venkateshappa C, Harish G, Mahadevan A, Srinivas Bharath MM, Shankar SK. Elevated oxidative stress and decreased antioxidant function in the human hippocampus and frontal cortex with increasing age: implications for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Res. 2012;37:1601–14.
Conrad M, Pratt DA. The chemical basis of ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:1137–47.
Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171:273–85.
Zilka O, Shah R, Li B, Friedmann Angeli JP, Griesser M, Conrad M, et al. On the mechanism of cytoprotection by ferrostatin-1 and liproxstatin-1 and the role of lipid peroxidation in ferroptotic cell death. ACS Cent Sci. 2017;3:232–43.
Munoz SS, Balez R, Castro Cabral-da-Silva ME, Berg T, Engel M, Bax M, et al. Generation and characterization of human induced pluripotent stem cell lines from a familial Alzheimer’s disease PSEN1 A246E patient and a non-demented family member bearing wild-type PSEN1. Stem Cell Res. 2018;31:227–30.
Oksanen M, Petersen AJ, Naumenko N, Puttonen K, Lehtonen S, Gubert Olive M, et al. PSEN1 mutant iPSC-derived model reveals severe astrocyte pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1885–97.
Balez R, Steiner N, Engel M, Munoz SS, Lum JS, Wu Y, et al. Neuroprotective effects of apigenin against inflammation, neuronal excitability and apoptosis in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31450.
Engel M, Balez R, Munoz SS, Cabral-da-Silva MC, Stevens CH, Bax M, et al. Viral-free generation and characterization of a human induced pluripotent stem cell line from dermal fibroblasts. Stem Cell Res. 2018;32:135–8.
Munoz SS, Engel M, Balez R, Do-Ha D, Cabral-da-Silva MC, Hernandez D, et al. A Simple differentiation protocol for generation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived basal forebrain-like cholinergic neurons for alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia disease modeling. Cells. 2020;9:2018.
Hulme AJ, McArthur JR, Maksour S, Miellet S, Ooi L, Adams DJ, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of neurogenin-2 induced human sensory neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:600895.
Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of cell viability by the MTT assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018;2018.
Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72.
Viswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Dhruv HD, Gill S, Eichhoff OM, Seashore-Ludlow B, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. 2017;547:453–7.
Ong CT, Cheng HT, Chang LW, Ohtsuka T, Kageyama R, Stormo GD, et al. Target selectivity of vertebrate notch proteins. Collaboration between discrete domains and CSL-binding site architecture determines activation probability. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:5106–19.
Zhu Z, Li QV, Lee K, Rosen BP, González F, Soh CL, et al. Genome editing of lineage determinants in human pluripotent stem cells reveals mechanisms of pancreatic development and diabetes. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:755–68.
Maynard CJ, Cappai R, Volitakis I, Cherny RA, Masters CL, Li QX, et al. Gender and genetic background effects on brain metal levels in APP transgenic and normal mice: implications for Alzheimer beta-amyloid pathology. J Inorg Biochem. 2006;100:952–62.
Song H, Boo JH, Kim KH, Kim C, Kim YE, Ahn JH, et al. Critical role of presenilin-dependent γ-secretase activity in DNA damage-induced promyelocytic leukemia protein expression and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20:639–48.
Driscoll DM, Copeland PR. Mechanism and regulation of selenoprotein synthesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2003;23:17–40.
Friedmann Angeli JP, Conrad M. Selenium and GPX4, a vital symbiosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;127:153–9.
Zhu S, Zhang Q, Sun X, Zeh HJ 3rd, Lotze MT, Kang R, et al. HSPA5 regulates ferroptotic cell death in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2017;77:2064–77.
Wu Z, Geng Y, Lu X, Shi Y, Wu G, Zhang M, et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy is involved in the execution of ferroptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:2996–3005.
Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu J, Kang R, Tang D. Interplay between MTOR and GPX4 signaling modulates autophagy-dependent ferroptotic cancer cell death. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021;28:55–63.
Shimada K, Skouta R, Kaplan A, Yang WS, Hayano M, Dixon SJ, et al. Global survey of cell death mechanisms reveals metabolic regulation of ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:497–503.
Yu NN, Tan MS, Yu JT, Xie AM, Tan L. The role of reelin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:5692–5700.
Burk RF, Hill KE, Motley AK, Winfrey VP, Kurokawa S, Mitchell SL, et al. Selenoprotein P and apolipoprotein E receptor-2 interact at the blood-brain barrier and also within the brain to maintain an essential selenium pool that protects against neurodegeneration. FASEB J. 2014;28:3579–88.
Wang W, Moerman-Herzog AM, Slaton A, Barger SW. Presenilin 1 mutations influence processing and trafficking of the ApoE receptor apoER2. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;49:145–53.
De Strooper B, Annaert W, Cupers P, Saftig P, Craessaerts K, Mumm JS, et al. A presenilin-1-dependent gamma-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature. 1999;398:518–22.
Brai E, Marathe S, Astori S, Fredj NB, Perry E, Lamy C, et al. Notch1 regulates hippocampal plasticity through interaction with the reelin pathway, glutamatergic transmission and CREB signaling. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:447.
Hurtado C, Safarova A, Smith M, Chung R, Bruyneel AAN, Gomez-Galeno J, et al. Disruption of NOTCH signaling by a small molecule inhibitor of the transcription factor RBPJ. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10811.
Nikseresht S, Bush AI, Ayton S. Treating Alzheimer’s disease by targeting iron. Br J Pharm. 2019;176:3622–35.
Lane DJR, Metselaar B, Greenough M, Bush AI, Ayton SJ. Ferroptosis and NRF2: an emerging battlefield in the neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease. Essays Biochem. 2021;65:925–40.
Saura CA, Choi SY, Beglopoulos V, Malkani S, Zhang D, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, et al. Loss of presenilin function causes impairments of memory and synaptic plasticity followed by age-dependent neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2004;42:23–36.
Watanabe H, Iqbal M, Zheng J, Wines-Samuelson M, Shen J. Partial loss of presenilin impairs age-dependent neuronal survival in the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2014;34:15912–22.
Van der Jeugd A, Parra-Damas A, Baeta-Corral R, Soto-Faguás CM, Ahmed T, LaFerla FM, et al. Reversal of memory and neuropsychiatric symptoms and reduced tau pathology by selenium in 3xTg-AD mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6431.
Zhang ZH, Wu QY, Zheng R, Chen C, Chen Y, Liu Q, et al. Selenomethionine mitigates cognitive decline by targeting both tau hyperphosphorylation and autophagic clearance in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J Neurosci. 2017;37:2449–62.
Song G, Zhang Z, Wen L, Chen C, Shi Q, Zhang Y, et al. Selenomethionine ameliorates cognitive decline, reduces tau hyperphosphorylation, and reverses synaptic deficit in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41:85–99.
Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8:595–608.
Chávez-Gutiérrez L, Bammens L, Benilova I, Vandersteen A, Benurwar M, Borgers M, et al. The mechanism of γ-Secretase dysfunction in familial Alzheimer disease. EMBO J. 2012;31:2261–74.
Byrns CN, Pitts MW, Gilman CA, Hashimoto AC, Berry MJ. Mice lacking selenoprotein P and selenocysteine lyase exhibit severe neurological dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and audiogenic seizures. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:9662–74.
Yoo SE, Chen L, Na R, Liu Y, Rios C, Van Remmen H, et al. Gpx4 ablation in adult mice results in a lethal phenotype accompanied by neuronal loss in brain. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52:1820–7.
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Bart De Strooper (VIB Center for Brain and Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Department for Neurology, Leuven, Belgium; Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK) for his kind gift of the WT, PS KO and mutant MEFs used in this study. We also thank Ms. Minna Oksanen (A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Finland) for creating the iPSC lines.
Funding
This work was supported by funds from the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia and Australian Research Council (ARC). MAG is a recipient of an ARC-NHMRC Dementia Research Development Fellowships. LO is supported by a NHMRC of Australia Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship. SA is supported by a NHMRC Leadership Fellowship. We also thank Dementia Australia for their generous support. The Florey Institute also acknowledges financial support from the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MAG, DJRL, SA, and AIB were responsible for research design; JK provided the PS1 ΔE9 and relevant CRISPR-corrected isogenic control iPSCs; LO, RB, and HTDA created and provided the iPSC neurons; MAG, DJRL, and ZZ performed cell biology experiments; DJRL created the CRISPR-Cas9 KOs; KA and MAG performed the lipid peroxidation experiments and analysis; KG and CAM performed the ICPMS elemental measurements; AAB created the LRP8 constructs; MAG and DJRL performed the statistical analyses; MAG, DJRL, SA, AIB, and AAB performed data analyses and interpretation; MAG, DJRL, SA, and AIB drafted the paper. SA and AIB supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
AIB is a shareholder in Alterity Ltd, Cogstate Ltd and Mesoblast Ltd. He is a paid consultant for, and has a profit share interest in, Collaborative Medicinal Development Pty Ltd. He has received lecture fees from Biogen and Merck Sharp & Dohme P/L. No other authors have competing interests to declare.
Ethics statement
All human iPSC-experiments were conducted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Wollongong Human Ethics Research Committee (HE 13/299).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by L. Greene
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Greenough, M.A., Lane, D.J.R., Balez, R. et al. Selective ferroptosis vulnerability due to familial Alzheimer’s disease presenilin mutations. Cell Death Differ 29, 2123–2136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-01003-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-01003-1
This article is cited by
-
The cell biology of ferroptosis
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2024)
-
The mechanism of ferroptosis and its related diseases
Molecular Biomedicine (2023)
-
An integrated view of lipid metabolism in ferroptosis revisited via lipidomic analysis
Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2023)
-
Emerging roles and therapeutic potentials of ferroptosis: from the perspective of 11 human body organ systems
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2023)