Abstract
Measuring protein conformational stability is one key to solving the protein folding problem. The conformational stability is the free energy change of the unfolding reaction, F ↔ U, under ambient conditions, ΔGU = GU - GF. Traditional methods of measuring ΔGU are solvent (urea or guanidinium chloride (GdmCl)) or thermal denaturation1. Solvent denaturation curves are generally analyzed using the linear extrapolation method (LEM): ΔG = ΔGU(H2O) - m[denaturant] (1) where m is a measure of the dependence of ΔG on denaturant, and ΔGU(H2O) is an estimate of the conformational stability that assumes that the linear dependence of ΔG on denaturant observed in the transition region continues to 0 M denaturant. Thermal denaturation experiments yield the melting temperature, Tm, the enthalpy change at Tm, ΔHm, and the heat capacity change, ΔCp, which can then be used to calculate ΔGU at any temperature T, ΔGU(T), with the Gibbs–Helmholtz equation: ΔGU(T) = ΔHm(1 - T/Tm) + ΔCp[T - Tm - T ln (T/Tm)] (2)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Pace, C.N. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 3, 1–43 (1975).
Perrett, S., Clarke, J., Hounslow, A. & Fersht, A.R. Biochemistry 34, 9288–9298 ( 1995).
Padmanabhan, P. et al. Biochemistry 36, 6424–6436 (1997).
Fuentes, E.J. & Wand, A.J. Biochemistry 37, 3687–3698 (1998).
Bhuyan, A.K. & Udgaonkar, J.B. Proteins 30, 295–308 (1998).
Krugelund, B.B., Heinemann, B., Knudsen, J. & Poulsen, F.M. Protein Sci. 7, 2237–2248 (1998).
Li, R. & Woodward, C. Protein Sci. 8, 1571–1591 (1999).
Neira, J.L., Sevilla, P., Menéndez, M., Bruix, M. & Rico, M. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 627–643 (1999).
Bai, Y., Milne, J.S., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 20, 4–14 (1994).
Jabs, A., Weiss, M.S. & Hilgenfeld, R. J. Mol. Biol. 286, 291– 304 (1999).
Reimer, U. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 279, 449– 460 (1998).
Mayr, L.M., Odefey, C., Schutkowski, M. & Schmid, F.X. Biochemistry 35, 5550–5561 (1996).
Makhatadze, G.I., Clore, G.M. & Gronenborn, A.M. Nature Struct. Biol. 2, 852 –855 (1995).
Bai, Y., Milne, J.S., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 17, 75–86 (1993).
Myers, J.K., Pace, C.N. & Scholtz, J.M. Biochemistry 36, 10923– 10929 (1997).
Delaglio, F. et al. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277– 293 (1995).
Mayo, S.L. & Baldwin, R.L. Science 262, 873–876 (1993).
Wang, A., Robertson, A.D. & Bolen, D.W. Biochemistry 34, 15096– 15104 (1995).
Neira, J.L., Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E., Davis, B. & Fersht, A.R. J. Mol. Biol. 270, 99–110 (1997).
Foord, R.L. & Leatherbarrow, R.J. Biochemistry 37, 2969–2978 (1998).
Betz, S.F. et al. Biochemistry 35, 7422– 7428 (1996).
Radford, S.E., Buck, M., Topping, K.D., Dobson, C.M. & Evans, P.A. Proteins 14, 237– 248 (1992).
Ogasahara, K. & Hamaguchi, K. Biochemistry 61, 199–210 (1967).
Vugmeyster, L., Kuhlman, B. & Raleigh, D.P. Protein Sci. 7, 1994– 1997 (1998).
Kuhlman, B. & Raleigh, D.P. Protein Sci. 7, 2405–2412 (1998).
Swint–Kruse, L. & Robertson, A.D. Biochemistry 35, 171–180 ( 1996).
Swint-Kruse, L. & Robertson, A.D. Biochemistry 34, 4724–4732 ( 1995).
Yi, Q., Scalley, M.L., Simons, K.T., Gladwin, S.T. & Baker, D. Fold. Des. 2, 271–279 (1997).
Grantcharova, V.P. & Baker, D. Biochemistry 36, 15685–15692 (1997).
Chamberlain, A.K., Handel, T.M. & Marqusee, S. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 782– 787 (1996).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank C. Woodward for a preprint of a recent review on hydrogen exchange, S. Marqusee and M. Llinas for sending unpublished data, and many colleagues for helpful discussions and comments. Support from National Institutes of Health and the Robert A. Welch Foundation is acknowledged. J.M.S. is an American Heart Association Established Investigator, and C.N.P. is supported by the Tom and Jean McMullin Professorship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huyghues-Despointes, B., Scholtz, J. & Pace, C. Protein conformational stabilities can be determined from hydrogen exchange rates. Nat Struct Mol Biol 6, 910–912 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/13273
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/13273
This article is cited by
-
Multiple Ligand-Bound States of a Phosphohexomutase Revealed by Principal Component Analysis of NMR Peak Shifts
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Conformational distributions of denatured and unstructured proteins are similar to those of 20 × 20 blocked dipeptides
Journal of Biomolecular NMR (2012)
-
An upper limit for macromolecular crowding effects
BMC Biophysics (2011)
-
NMR of unfolded proteins
Journal of Chemical Sciences (2005)
-
Energetic landscape of α-lytic protease optimizes longevity through kinetic stability
Nature (2002)