Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Therapy Insight: gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has been increasingly associated with ear, nose and throat signs and symptoms; however, the cause and effect relationship between these two clinical entities is far from established. Many patients initially diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease as the cause of laryngeal signs do not respond either symptomatically or laryngoscopically to aggressive acid suppression, and do not have abnormal esophageal acid exposure as measured by pH monitoring. This has resulted in frustration on the part of both gastroenterologists and ear, nose and throat physicians, and confusion on the part of patients. This review discusses the reasons for this controversy and highlights data that attempt to clarify this complex area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Normal laryngeal tissue as viewed by laryngoscopy.
Figure 2: Laryngoscopic examinations of laryngeal sites that show more injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease than in healthy subjects.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaezi MF et al. (2003) Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1: 333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koufman JA et al. (1988) Reflux laryngitis and its sequelae. J Voice 2: 78–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Laryngoscope 101: 1–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toohill RJ and Kuhn JC (1997) Role of refluxed acid in pathogenesis of laryngeal disorders. Am J Med 103: 100S–106S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaynor EB (1991) Otolaryngologic manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 86: 801–808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Graser AG (1994) Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 8: 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koufman JA et al. (1996) Laryngeal reflux: consensus conference. J Voice 10: 21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delahunty JE and Cherry J (1968) Experimentally produced vocal cord granulomas. Laryngoscope 78: 1941–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nebel OT et al. (1976) Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: incidence and precipitating factors. Am J Dig Dis 21: 953–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McNally PR et al. (1989) Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of idiopathic hoarseness. Dig Dis Sci 34: 1900–1904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Irwin RS et al. (1977) Cough: a comprehensive review. Arch Intern Med 137: 1186–1191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Irwin RS et al. (1981) Chronic persistent cough in the adult: the spectrum and frequency of causes and successful outcome of specific therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 123: 413–417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Irwin RS and Madison JM (2000) Anatomical diagnostic protocol in evaluating chronic cough with specific reference to gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 108 (Suppl 4a): 126S–130S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curren JA et al. (1995) A prospective study of acid reflux and globus pharyngeus using a modified symptom index. Clin Otolarnygol Allied Sci 20: 552–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ott DJ et al. (1994) Globus pharyngeus: radiographic evaluation and 24-hour pH monitoring of the pharynx and esophagus in 22 patients. Radiology 191: 95–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feeland AP et al. (1974) Globus hystericus and reflux esophagitis. J Laryngol Otol 88: 1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ward PH and Hanson DG (1998) Reflux as an etiological factor of carcinoma of the laryngopharynx. Laryngoscope 98: 1195–1199

    Google Scholar 

  18. Freije JE (1996) Carcinoma of the larynx in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Otolaryngol 17: 386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison MD (1988) Is chronic gastroesophageal reflux a causative factor in glottic carcinoma? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 99: 370–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaynor EB (1988) Gastroesophageal reflux as an etiologic factor in laryngeal complications of intubation. Laryngoscope 98: 972–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Little FB et al. (1985) Effect of gastric acid on the pathogenesis of subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94: 516–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adhami T et al. (2004) Role of gastric and duodenal ingredients in laryngeal tissue injury: an experimental study in dogs. Am J Gastroenterol 99: 2098–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed T et al. (2005) Chronic laryngitis associated with GERD: a large scale prospective assessment of differences in practice patterns between gastroenterologists and ENT physicians [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 128: A388

    Google Scholar 

  24. Milstein C et al. Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs flexible laryngoscope). Laryngoscope (in press)

  25. Hicks DM et al. (2002) The prevalence of hypopharyngeal findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers. J Voice 16: 564–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Belafsky PC et al. (2001) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 111: 1313–1317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vaezi MF et al. (2000) Are there specific laryngeal signs for gastroesophageal reflux disease? [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 118: 2639

    Google Scholar 

  28. Park W et al. (2005) Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR): prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of PPI therapy and pre-therapy predictors of response. Laryngoscope 115: 1230–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Branski RC et al. (2002) The reliability of the assessment of endoscopic laryngeal findings associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. Laryngoscope 112: 1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jacob P et al. (1991) Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with “reflux laryngitis”. Gastroenterology 100: 305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz PO (1990) Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness. Am J Gastroenterol 85: 38–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ulualp SO et al. (1999) Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120: 672–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaker R et al. (1995) Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis. Gastroenterology 109: 1575–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eubanks TR et al. (2001) Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg 5: 183–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Metz DC et al. (1997) Pilot study of the oral omeprazole test for reflux laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116: 41–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Little JP et al. (1996) Extraesophageal pediatric reflux: 24-hour double probe pH monitoring of 222 children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 169: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen MYM et al. (1998) Correlation of laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinomas and 24-hour pH monitoring of the esophagus and pharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119: 460–462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiener GJ et al. (1989) Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 84: 1503–1508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ossakow SJ et al. (1988) Esophageal reflux and dysmotility as the basis for persistent cervical symptoms. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96: 387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson JA et al. (1989) Gastroesophageal reflux and posterior laryngitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98: 405–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Vaezi MF et al. (1997) Reproducibility of proximal probe pH parameters in 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 92: 825–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shaker R et al. (2003) Intrapharyngeal distribution of gastric acid refluxate. Laryngoscope 113: 1182–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ulualp SO et al. (2001) Outcomes of acid suppressive therapy in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124: 16–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hanson DG et al. (1995) Outcomes of antireflux therapy for the treatment of chronic laryngitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104: 550–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Woo P et al. (1996) Association of esophageal reflux and globus symptom: comparison of laryngoscopy and 24-hour pH manometry. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 502–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Smit CF et al. (2001) Effect of cigarette smoking on gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110: 190–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tutuian R et al. (2003) Multichannel intraluminal impedance in esophageal function testing and gastroesophageal reflux monitoring. J Clin Gastroenterol 37: 206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mainie I et al. (2005) Symptom type on PPI therapy does not predict reflux identified by multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH. Gastroenterology 128 (Suppl 2): M1796

    Google Scholar 

  49. Maqbool S et al. (2005) Does combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH help with the diagnosis of refractory GERD? [Abstract]. Am J Gastroenterol 100: A21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kamel PL et al. (1994) Omeprazole for the treatment of posterior laryngitis. Am J Med 96: 321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shaw GY and Searl JP (1997) Laryngeal manifestations of GER before and after treatment with omeprazole. South Med J 90: 1115–1122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wo JM et al. (1997) Empiric trial of high-dose omeprazole in patients with posterior laryngitis: a prospective study. Am J Gastro 92: 2160–2165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ormseth EJ and Wong RKH (1999) Reflux laryngitis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Am J Gastroenterol 94: 2812–2817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Peghini PL et al. (1998) Nocturnal recovery of gastric acid secretion with twice daily dosing of proton pump inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol 93: 763–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Peghini PL et al. (1998) Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole: a controlled study in normal subjects. Gastroenterology 115: 1335–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fackler WK et al. (2002) Long-term effect of H2RA therapy on nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough. Gastroenterology 122: 625–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ours TM et al. (2003) Nocturnal acid breakthrough: clinical significance and correlation with esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Havas T et al. (1999) Posterior pharyngolaryngitis: double blind randomized placebo controlled trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Aust J Otolaryngol 3: 243–246

    Google Scholar 

  59. El-Serag H et al. (2001) Lansoprazole treatment of patients with chronic idiopathic laryngitis: a placebo controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 979–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Noordzij JP et al. (2001) Evaluation of omeprazole in the treatment of reflux laryngitis: a prospective placebo controlled randomized double blind study. Laryngoscope 111: 2147–2151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Eherer AJ et al. (2003) Effect of pantoprazole on the course of reflux associated laryngitis: a placebo controlled double blind cross over study. Scan J Gastroenterol 38: 462–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Steward DL et al. (2004) Proton pump inhibitor therapy for chronic laryngo-pharyngitis: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131: 342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vaezi MF et al. A randomized double blind placebo controlled study of acid suppression for the treatment of suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope (in press).

  64. Swoger J et al. Surgical fundoplication in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) unresponsive to aggressive acid suppression: a prospective concurrent controlled study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (in press)

  65. So JBY et al. (1998) Outcome of atypical symptoms attributed to gastroesophageal reflux treated by laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgery 124: 28–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Larrain A et al. (1991) Medical and surgical treatment of nonallergic asthma associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Chest 99: 1330–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Klaus A et al. (2001) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 111 (Suppl 8a): 202S–206S

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael F Vaezi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaezi, M. Therapy Insight: gastroesophageal reflux disease and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2, 595–603 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0358

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0358

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing