Multi-cellular organisms have evolved multiple mechanisms to respond to decreased oxygen levels (hypoxia).1 Healthy individuals typically encounter hypoxia at high altitudes, where at least three prominent physiological responses take place: neurotransmitter release by the carotid body to increase breathing; pulmonary vascular constriction to shunt blood to better oxygenated regions of the lung; and production of the hormone erythropoietin to enhance red blood cell mass and hemoglobin concentration in the blood.2 Hypoxia is also a feature of many diseases such as pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, myocardial ischemia, and cancer.3, 4
Although physiological responses to hypoxia at the organismal and tissue level have been appreciated for decades, the molecular and cellular biology of hypoxia have only been elucidated in the past 15 years. Notably, the discovery of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1, by Gregg Semenza and colleagues in the 1990s provided a molecular platform to investigate the mechanisms underlying responses to O2 deprivation. HIF-1 was discovered as a nuclear factor bound to a cis-acting hypoxia response element in the 3′flanking region of the erythropoietin gene during hypoxia.5 Further biochemical purification experiments led to the identification of genes encoding the HIF-1α and HIF-1ß subunits.6 HIF-1α protein is only detectable under hypoxic conditions, while HIF-1ß subunit is constitutively stable. Subsequently, HIF-2α and HIF-3α were discovered, which show similar regulation in response to hypoxia.7, 8
The biological consequences of HIF activity have been determined utilizing HIF-gene targeting experiments. The HIF-1α and HIF-1ß knockout mice demonstrated embryonic lethality by day 8.5–10.5 due to cardiac malformations, vascular regression hematopoietic abnormalities, and placental defects.9, 10, 11, 12 Conditional knockouts of HIF-1α and HIF-1ß subunits have highlighted the importance of HIF-1 and HIF-2 in normal vascular and hematopoietic development as well as in tumorigenesis, pulmonary hypertension, myocardial ischemia, and inflammatory diseases.
A major research focus in the hypoxia field for the past 10 years has revolved around identifying the regulators and biological consequences of HIF activation. A major breakthrough in the regulation of HIFs came from studies demonstrating that complexes containing the tumor suppressor von Hippel–Lindau protein serves as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for the degradation of HIF-α protein during normoxia.13 Subsequent studies demonstrated that HIF-α protein is hydroxylated at proline residues by prolyl hydroxylases under normoxia to allow von Hippel–Lindau protein interaction.14, 15, 16 HIF-α protein is also hydroxylated at an asparagine residue by the asparaginyl hydroxylase FIH under normoxia to prevent interactions with co-activators such as p300 and aberrant transcriptional activation.17, 18 Hypoxia suppresses the hydroxylation of proline and asparagine residues, thereby allowing full HIF transcriptional activation. Mechanism(s) by which hypoxia prevents hydroxylation are not fully understood. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to the prolyl hydroxylases and FIH, reactive oxygen species from the mitochondrial electron transport chain and mitochondrial metabolites are also likely to regulate hydroxylation of the HIF-α protein.19, 20 Thus, multiple inputs likely regulate the HIF-α hydroxylation.
This collection of reviews discusses our current knowledge of how hypoxia regulates HIFs through the prolyl hydroxylases, von Hippel-Lindau protein, FIH, and the mitochondrial electron transport chain, as well as many normal and pathophysiological roles of HIF protein.21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 The series also includes articles related to three new areas for HIFs, namely stem cells, non-transcriptional functions, and regulation of microRNAs.28, 29, 30 Like all rapidly evolving fields, we hope this series is timely in discussing progress in the past 15 years in the hypoxia field as well as projecting important new directions. We hope the readers of Cell Death and Differentiation will find these reviews useful for both research and teaching purposes.
References
Semenza GL . Science 2007; 318: 62–64.
Bunn HF, Poyton RO . Physiol Rev 1996; 76: 839–885.
Harris AL . Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 38–47.
Giordano FJ . J Clin Invest 2005; 115: 500–508.
Semenza GL, Wang GL . Cell Biol 1992; 12: 5447–5454.
Wang GL, Semenza GL . J Biol Chem 1995; 270: 1230–1237.
Tian H, McKnight SL, Russel DW . Genes Dev 1997; 11: 72–82.
Gu YZ et al. Gene Expr 1998; 7: 205–213.
Maltepe E et al. Nature 1997; 386: 403–407.
Carmeliet P et al. Nature 1998; 394: 485–490.
Iyer NV et al. Genes Dev 1998; 12: 149–162.
Ryan HE, Lo J, Johnson RS . EMBO J 1998; 17: 3005–3015.
Maxwell PH et al. Nature 1999; 399: 271–275.
Ivan M et al. Science 2001; 292: 464–468.
Jaakkola P et al. Science 2001; 292: 468–472.
Epstein AC et al. Cell 2001; 107: 43–54.
Mahon PC, Hirota K, Semenza GL . Genes Dev 2001; 15: 2675–2686.
Lando D et al. Genes Dev 2002; 16: 1466–1471.
Bell EL et al. J Cell Biol 2007; 177: 1029–1036.
Pan Y et al. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 912–925.
Klimova T, Chandel NS . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 660–666.
Fong G-H, Takeda K . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 635–641.
Lisy K, Peet DJ . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 642–649.
Kapitsinou PP, Haase VH . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 650–659.
Weidemann A, Johnson RS . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 621–627.
Loor G, Schumacker PT . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 686–690.
Rankin EB, Giaccia AJ . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 678–685.
Huang E . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 672–677.
Kulshreshtha R, Davuluri R, Calin GA, Ivan M . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 667–671.
Patel SA, Simon MC . Cell Death Differ 2008; 15: 628–634.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chandel, N., Simon, M. Hypoxia-inducible factor: roles in development, physiology, and disease. Cell Death Differ 15, 619–620 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.11
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.11
This article is cited by
-
Differentiated Embryo Chondrocyte 1 (DEC1) Represses PPARγ2 Gene through Interacting with CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein β (C/EBPβ)
Molecules and Cells (2012)
-
Extracellular matrix genes as hypoxia-inducible targets
Cell and Tissue Research (2010)
-
Reactivating HIF prolyl hydroxylases under hypoxia results in metabolic catastrophe and cell death
Oncogene (2009)