Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Rhodopsin evolution in the dark

Abstract

The gene for the visual pigment rhodopsin has been extensively studied from biochemical, molecular and evolutionary perspectives. This makes it ideal for investigating the relationship between protein structure and function1,2, and the effects of loss of functional constraint on the evolution of a gene. We specifically addressed the question of what happens when there is no light available by studying rhodopsin genes from three pairs of cave-dwelling and surface-dwelling freshwater crayfish species. Contrary to predictions, we found no differences in the rate of evolution between the cave and surface species or between the conserved and variable structural motifs of the rhodopsin protein. This suggests that rhodopsin might have a previously unknown function in the absence of light.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Maximum-likelihood reconstruction of nucleotide substitutions and amino-acid replacements for the crayfish phylogeny.

References

  1. Yokoyama, S. & Yokoyama, R. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 543–567 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yokoyama, S. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 53–61 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hobbs, H. H. J Smithson. Contr. Zool. 164, 1–32 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hobbs, H. H. Jr in Freshwater Crayfish: Biology, Management and Exploitation (eds Holdich, D. M. & Lowery, R. S.) 52-82 (Timber, Portland, 1988).

  5. Crandall, K. A. & Fitzpatrick, J. F. Jr. Syst. Biol. 45, 1–26 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yokoyama, S., Meany, A., Wilkens, H. & Yokoyama, R. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 527–532 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z., Kumar, S. & Nei, M. Genetics 141, 1641–1650 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, Z. PAML, Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (Inst. Mol. Evol. Genet., Pennsylvania State Univ., 1995).

  9. Hendriks, W., Leunissen, J., Nevo, E., Bloemendal, H. & de Jong, W. W. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 84, 5320–5324 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Argamaso, S. M. et al. Biophys. Chem. 56, 3–11 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sassone-Corsi, P. Cell 78, 361–364 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crow, E. L. & Gardner, R. S. Biometrika 46, 441–453 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1992).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crandall, K., Hillis, D. Rhodopsin evolution in the dark. Nature 387, 667–668 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/42628

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/42628

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing