Collection 

Nature's Astronomical Highlights

The journal Nature has been at the pinnacle of scientific publishing for many years. Founded by an astronomer, Norman Lockyer, it has had an extensive history in publishing the most significant developments in the Natural Sciences. For instance, James Chadwick published his discovery of the neutron in Nature; James Watson and Francis Crick presented the helical structure of DNA. Naturally, astronomy has been no exception: part of the discussion following the “Great Debate” on the nature of the Spiral Nebulae (were these small nebulae within our Galaxy or distant galaxies in their own right?) was contained in Nature’s pages in the early 1920s. In the 1960s, Maarten Schmidt’s discovery of the first quasar and Antony Hewish & Jocelyn Bell’s discovery of the first pulsar were presented in Nature. Even up until the present day, Nature is publishing discoveries that not only are of great interest to professional and amateur astronomers and astrophysicists, but also of relevance to humankind in general. In 2016 we discovered through the work of Guillem Anglada-Escudé and collaborators that the nearest star to our Solar System harbours a rocky planet in a temperate orbit.

It is on the back of these discoveries and this extensive history that Nature Research is launching a new journal in 2017, Nature Astronomy, so that more astronomical research might be published with a similar high standard of editing, peer review and production as Nature’s. To celebrate Nature’s comprehensive astronomical heritage, we at Nature Astronomy have curated this Web Collection of 40 Nature papers that have had significant impact on astronomical research. Several of these papers have been cited over 1,000 times in the astronomical literature. To include some more recent papers, which have not had the luxury of many years over which to accrue citations, we have also consulted Altmetric scores, which gauge social media impact among other things. The result is a Collection of Letters, Articles and Reviews that have been roughly grouped into seven themes: exoplanets, pulsars, black holes & short gamma-ray bursts, long gamma-ray bursts & supernovae, galaxies, dark matter and the large-scale structure of the Universe. Several of these papers have been selected for Free Access for a limited period; these can be found collected together below, or in the “Free access” tab, above. 

Before we delve into these seven topics, there is one stimulating paper that stands apart, written by astronomer and science communicator Carl Sagan and his colleagues (Sagan et al. 1993). It details an experiment performed with the Galileo spacecraft on its way to Jupiter. Galileo was commanded to turn towards the Earth, and capture data with its instruments. Effectively it observed the Earth for signs of life. However, it only just managed to find them: it saw a water-rich atmosphere and surface; it saw signs of biological activity in the high levels of methane; it saw a red-absorbing pigment that might have been responsible for photosynthesis; but the only compelling and indicative detection was that of narrow-band radio emission suggestive of a technological civilisation. The paper presented a unique opportunity to objectively observe our blue marble planet from afar.

Many Nature articles have helped to redefine our knowledge of the Universe. None of these have had bigger implications than those which have sought to explain how the entire Universe is put together. George Blumenthal, Sandra Faber, Joel Primack and Martin Rees presented a succinct summary of the understanding that was prevalent in the early 1980s of the structure of the Universe (Blumenthal et al. 1984). The sizes and shapes of galaxies and their propensity to cluster hierarchically were all put in the context of cold dark matter, the best model available at the time. The huge voids between the galaxy clusters and superclusters that make up the filamentary components of the Universe were discussed in depth by Yakov Zel’dovich and colleagues (Zeldovich et al. 1982).

The structure that we see in the present-day Universe is a result of tiny fluctuations in conditions in the instants after the Big Bang. These inhomogeneities are visible today as small temperature anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the faint imprint of the Big Bang after cosmic inflation. Nature presented the first images of resolved structure in the CMB in an article by Paolo de Bernardis and collaborators (de Bernardis et al. 2000). These observational results, from a balloon-borne experiment called Boomerang, were a strong confirmation of the cold dark matter-based cosmological models. In the framework of these models, the CMB was also expected to be polarised, a property that could be verified observationally. John Kovac and colleagues from the University of Chicago took up the challenge with an interferometer called DASI (Kovac et al. 2002), finding a level of polarisation in excellent agreement with the theory.

As a test of cold dark matter and inflation theories, Volker Springel and collaborators constructed two significant simulations of the Universe, the results of which found a place in Nature. The first, the ‘Millenium Simulation’ (Springel et al. 2005) used 10 billion particles inside a cube of 2.23 billion ly per side. They found that baryon-induced features in the initial conditions would be visible today, in the distribution of low-redshift galaxies, although in a distorted form. The simulation was so rich in resolution that they could examine the clustering of galaxies as a function of redshift and galaxy properties, they could follow the fate of the first quasars in the Universe, and visualise the cosmic web of cold dark matter filaments. The report of the second simulation, ‘Illustris’ was led by Mark Vogelsberger (Vogelsberger et al. 2014). It detailed a smaller simulation with more resolution elements that focused on the creation of a mixed population of elliptical and spiral galaxies, as well as reproducing the observed large-scale distribution of galaxies in clusters and metallicities of individual galaxies.