Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses in Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
- Submission status
- Open
Systematic reviews and meta analyses are important tools used to aid research in Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. They allow in-depth assessments of a topic, and aim to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all relevant individual studies over a health-related issue. They are used to provide a clear overview of focused questions and their evidence can inform decision-making and policy, and ultimately impact patient treatment.
This Collection will showcase Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses, in particular but not limited to the areas of:
- Primary Care
- Global Health
- Community Medicine
- Remote Consulting
- Telehealth
- Remote Care
Editors
-
Tiago Maricoto
Assistant Editor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior
All articles have undergone npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine's standard peer review process and have been subject to all of the journal’s standard policies. This includes the journal’s policy on competing interests. The Editors declare no competing interests with the submissions which they have handled through the peer review process. The peer review of any submissions for which the Editors have competing interests is handled by another Editorial Board Member who has no competing interests.
Further details about our collection submission policies can be found here.
