Abstract
Objectives:
This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the employment of people who experience spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States and recommending future research.
Methods:
The literature was reviewed with search terms such as SCI, employment, working from home and telework using databases in EBSCO, including Academic Search Complete and the American Psychological Association’s databases.
Results:
Literature and findings on key factors related to employment illustrate the multiple dimensions of work environments, and health demands, that effect employment outcomes for people with SCI.
Conclusion:
Employment is important for people with SCI and valued in society. The literature reviewed indicates that researchers understand the work demands for people with SCI and may help to identify suitable supports, training and job opportunities. There remains a need for research focus on understanding future employment demands, necessary work skills, differing work environments and methods for increasing and preserving employment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
This review article is submitted for the state of the science in spinal cord injury (SCI) Rehabilitation: informing a new research agenda. The objective of this paper is to recommend future research about employment for people who experience SCI.
Methods
The literature was reviewed with search terms such as SCI, employment, working from home and telework using databases in EBSCO, including Academic Search Complete and the American Psychological Association’s databases.
Results
One of the most important goals of rehabilitation and a key to independent living after SCI is employment.1 The need for employment in our society and the dependence that we have on it will continue in the future. The employment rate for people with SCI is low and there is little reason to believe that it will improve in the near term.2 Many individuals experiencing SCI have low expectations for employment, with only 35% employed compared with 64% of working age adults without disabilities in the United States.3 Perhaps, not surprisingly, those without employment have less income and die younger.4
One study on adults with pediatric-onset SCI identified four factors associated with obtaining employment: education, community mobility, independence and decreased medical complications.5 Anderson et al.6 suggests more reasons: education, type of employment, disability severity, age, time since injury, gender, marital status and social support, vocational counseling, medical problems related to SCI, employer’s role, environment and professional interests.
People with disabilities who are working will leave jobs at faster rates after age 40 than the general population, even those with advanced degrees.7 In 2008, 9% of workers with disabilities left their jobs, nearly twice the rate of job exit than for workers without disabilities.8 Research is needed to help us understand these dynamics.
Health-related issues
One of the biggest barriers to employment is the severity of the disability and concomitant impairment-related health issues. Studies continue to show concerns of people with SCI about the potential loss of health and income benefits,9 challenges finding personal assistance10 and need for additional supports at home, in the community and on the job.11 Rehabilitation research can help people experiencing SCI in finding solutions for acquiring and maintaining employment, and living productive lives by gaining a better understanding of employment-related demands on stamina and challenges to psychological and physical well-being.
Employment interrupted by injury and illness leaves long breaks on resumes, lessens skills and hinders employment chances.12 Research is needed to help understand how to best support injured employees as they communicate about their status with managers, human resources offices, insurance and other benefit programs, and physician practices. Methods for improving communications between workers with disabilities, doctors and employers need to be identified and studied.
Health-related issues may have an enormous effect on employment for individuals experiencing SCI. Psychosocial history and current emotional readiness to return to work must be considered when preparing for continued employment.13 Infections and complications of urological and other body systems must be continuously monitored and managed in the context of employment. Pressure on the skin due to sitting for long periods of time may prevent work or interrupt work, may delay task accomplishments, and may restrict travel and training. Treatment of pressure sores in the US costs more than $1.5 billion annually.14 Even the type of bladder catheter impacts employment success.15 Research aimed at reducing and preventing secondary health conditions is vital in helping people with SCI obtain and maintain employment.
People experiencing SCI have much higher rates of depression and mood-related disorders than those in the general population.16 Workers with SCI may experience significant stress related to work adjustment, scheduling specialized transportation, finding dependable skilled personal assistance providers and organizing other needed accommodations. It is not surprising that as depression and apprehension increases, quality of life decreases.17 Some analysts suggest future research efforts should focus on the individual challenges of resilience and understanding the coping process.18 Research is needed to better understand and to help ameliorate the psychological and physical problems associated with employment.
Working from home
There is little research on how working from home may impact the lives of people experiencing SCI. A review on the subject by Bricout19 documented only nine published empirical studies on telework for people with disabilities. Working from home may reduce barriers to employment for individuals with SCI by reducing the need for transportation and by improving access to personal support, which may be more available in the home. Working from home would allow people with SCI to work in prone and supine positions reducing risk or preventing exacerbation of pressure sores that are of great concern to wheelchair users.20 Research is needed to help document the benefits and justify the use of work-at-home strategies as accommodations.
Some employers are willing to offer part-time work-at-home opportunities when the need arises and if the employee has positive job performance. The literature suggests, new employees need to adjust to the organizational culture; at the same time, they must develop independent work skills for productive work from home.21 Research may identify best practices for helping employees to adjust to new work environments and for assisting them in moving between employment sites while establishing or maintaining relationships with co-workers.
Work and home environments are becoming more integrated with boundaries blurred.22 Research on work-home preferences found that to separately work from home is becoming more difficult, even for those who prefer to keep the domains apart.23 Employees are often unpaid for extra work hours at home expected by employers.24 Research is needed to better understand and to improve management of work-at-home demands, time management issues and functional business practices. Qualitative research methods may be useful and include observation, interviews and careful documentation of personal experiences.25 Research findings will be important in preparing workers to deal with conflict, set boundaries, develop skills and find the right work-life balance.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Employers continue to be resistant to work-at-home accommodation for people with disabilities. A Circuit by Circuit legal review (Yastrow and Edelson26) found support for only 3 of the 71 Americans, with ADA work-at-home challenges. Employers successfully argued to the courts that their need for teamwork, compliance, supervision, ready access, on-site meetings and cost-effectiveness outweighed the work-at-home accommodations sought by employees with disabilities. There were no people with SCI identified in the referenced case reviews, yet litigation research may provide answers for the future.
Although the ADA is not an affirmative action employment law, many observers believed the equal opportunities provisions of the law would result in increasing employment rates for people with disabilities. This has not proved to be the case.27 In fact, there is little or no evidence that the employment rate for people with disabilities is improving.28 Research on the impact of the ADA on employers may help to establish dialog on important employment issues. The hiring and accommodation process for people experiencing SCI is the responsibility of employers. Literature examining peer review studies on key predictors for employment success found employer goodwill and the attachment between the worker and the employer important for continued employment.29 Research, however, continues to show negative attitudes of employers on hiring individuals with disabilities.30
The ADA has significantly improved postsecondary campus accessibility, increasing the social presence of individuals with disabilities and educational support.31 On the bright side, research suggests educational attainment for individuals with SCI is higher for those who are 10 years post injury than for the general population of the United States.32 Research identifying employment trends may give educators insight into business needs and future occupational and career opportunities. There is substantial evidence that education provides a positive return on investment.33
As higher education continues to offer more educational and course opportunities online, there will be new educational and training opportunities for people with SCI. Students will need strong computer skills and access to appropriate technologies in order to benefit from these advances. The ability to work independently, achieve production and engage in online classes, while coping with distracting family and home life demands is difficult. As new distance education technology becomes available, addressing the accessibility issues for class assignments, readings and new media are a must. Research is needed to determine how best to accommodate people with disabilities in an online educational environment.34
Related to the discussion of online educational strategies is the concept of social presence in the electronic classroom.35 Internet users with health concerns now rank e-mail as their principal reason for using the internet.36 However, usage patterns are evolving from e-mail to texting, and from simple browsing to engagement with social media. In this context, studies have indicated that web-based social presence may provide positive personal support and group discussions may produce greater emotional satisfaction among users.37 Likewise, reduced isolation may increase the students’ sense of community and satisfaction.38
Will the ADA have the same impact on access to education in the virtual world? Information gained from research may help people with SCI realize the full potential of the internet revolution in education, employment and otherwise.
Discussion
Besides the research questions stated or implied above, the following are particularly pertinent:
How can employment outcomes improve, considering individual’s work history and vocational interests?
What will be the barriers and facilitators for individuals experiencing SCI in the future?
What do we still need to know about rehabilitation practices and the role of self-determination and individual choice in employment success?
What are the challenges for employers and individuals with SCI on work-at-home accommodations and employment?
How can Return to Work and Vocational Rehabilitation practitioners contribute to employment research?
What are the psychosocial dimensions of loss, coping and traumatic injury to employment?
Is there a role for participatory research in education, vocational rehabilitation and employment that includes people with SCI, their families, peers and health providers?
How will research help physicians work with their patients to keep their jobs, stay healthy and communicate needs to employers?
Conclusion
Employment is important for people with SCI and valued in our society. People experiencing SCI need flexible work environments. The literature reviewed indicates that researchers understand the work demands for people with SCI and may help to identify suitable supports, training and job opportunities. There remains a need for research focus on understanding future employment demands, necessary work skills, differing work environments and methods for increasing and preserving employment.
References
Hess DW, Meade MA, Forchheimer M, Tate DG . Psychological well-being and intensity of employment in individuals with a spinal cord injury. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spring 2004; 9: 1–10.
Krause JS, Pickelsimer E . Relationship of perceived barriers to employment and return to work five years later: a pilot study among 343 participants with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Couns Bull 2008; 51: 118–121.
Ottomanelli L, Lind L . Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med 2009; 32: 503–531.
Krause JS, Kewman D, DeVivo MJ, Maynard F, Coker J, Roach MJ et al. Employment after spinal cord injury: an analysis of cases from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1492–1500.
Zebracki K, Anderson CJ, Chlan KM, Vogel LC . Outcomes of adults with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury: longitudinal findings and implications on transition to adulthood. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. 2010; 16: 17–25.
Anderson D, Dumont S, Azzaria L, Le Bourdais M, Noreau L, Bond GR . Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: a literature review. J Vocat Rehabil 2007; 27: 57–68.
Mitchell JM, Adkins RH, Kemp BJ . The effects of aging on employment of people with and without disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull; Spring 2006; 49: 157–165.
Kaye HS . The impact of the 2007-09 recession on workers with disabilities. Monthly Labor Rev 2010; 133: 19–30.
Hills L, Cullen E . A study into the employment trends of individuals treated at spinal cord injury centre, including commentary by Kennedy P. Int J Ther Rehabil 2007; 14: 350–355.
Nosek MA, Walter LJ . Community integration of women with spinal cord injuries: an examination of psychological, social, vocational and environmental factors. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998; 4: 1–55.
Vissers M, Berg-Emons R, Sluis TI, Bergen M, Stam H, Bussmann H . Barriers to and facilitators of everyday physical activity in persons with a spinal cord injury after discharge from the rehabilitation centre. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 461–467.
Hall JP, Parker K . Stuck in a Loop: individual and system barriers for job seekers with disabilities. Career Dev Q 2010; 58: 246–256 retrieved 10 December 2010; Available from: http://www.edits.net/component/content/article/20/127.
Franche RL, Krause JS . Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 233–256.
Revis DR . Decubitus ulcers. Medscape 2010; retrieved 29 October 2010; Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/190115-overview.
Kurtaran A . Occupation in spinal cord injury patients in Turkey. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 709–712.
Kemp BJ, Kahan JS, Krause JS, Adkins RH, Nava G . Treatment of major depression in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2004; 27: 22–28.
Anderson CJ, Kelly EH, Klaas SJ, Russell H, Daharsh E, Vogel LC . Anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with spinal cord injuries. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51: 826–832.
Cárdenas A, Lopez L . Analysis matrix of resilience in the face of disability, old age and poverty. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 2010; 57: 175–189.
Bricout J . Using telework to enhance return to work outcomes for individuals with spinal cord injuries. NeuroRehabilitation 2004; 19: 147–159.
LaPlante MP . Prevalence of mobility and self-care disability—United States, 1990. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1993; 42: 3–7.
West MD, Anderson J . Telework and employees with disabilities: accommodation and funding options. Rehabilitation Research & Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University. J Vocat Rehabil 2005; 23: 115–122.
Johnson LC, Andrey J, Shaw SM Mr Dithers comes to dinner: Telework and the merging of women’s work and home domains in Canada University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Gender Place Culture 2007; 14: 141–161.
Kreiner GE . Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. J Organ Behav 2006; 27: 485–507 (www.interscience.wiley.com doi:10.1002/job.386).
Song Y . Unpaid work at home. Union College—Department of Economics Industrial Relations. J Economy Society 2009; 48: 578–588.
Offstein E, Morwick J, Koskinen L . Making telework work: leading people and leveraging technology for competitive advantage. Strategic HR Rev 2010; 9: 32–37.
Yastrow JH, Edelson JL . Working at home as a reasonable accommodation: a circuit-by circuit survey. Laner, Mchin, Domrow, Becker, Levin and Tominberg, Ltd. 2008.
Deleire T . The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. J Hum Resour 2000; 35: 693–715.
Krause JS, Reed KS . Barriers and facilitators to employment after spinal cord injury: underlying dimensions and their relationship to labor force participation. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 285–291.
MacEachen EC, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E . Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006; 32: 257–269.
Chan F, Strauser D, Maher P, Lee EJ, Jones R, Johnson ET . Demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities: a survey of employers in the Midwest region of the United States. J Occup Rehabil 20: 412–419.
Stodden RA, Conway MA . Supporting Individuals with Disabilities in Postsecondary Education American Rehabilitation Autumn 2003, retrieved 29 October 2010; Available from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0842/is_1_27/ai_110802883/?tag=content;col1.
Anderson D, Dumont S, Azzaria L, Bourdais ML, Noreau L . Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: a literature review. J Vocat Rehabil 2007; 27: 57–68.
Hollenbeck K, Kimmel J . Differences in the returns to education for males by disability status and age of disability onset. South Econ J 74.3 2008; 707.
Roberts J, Crittenden L . Accessible distance education 101. Res Higher Education J 2009; 4: 1–12.
Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK . Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence, Vol. 12. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003. pp 456–480. Posted online 13 March 2006 (doi:10.1162/105474603322761270), retrieved 20 December 2010; Available from: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/105474603322761270.
Eysenbach G . The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 356–371.
Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR, Archer W . Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. J Distance Education 2001; 14: 51–70.
Joyce KM, Brown A . Enhancing social presence in online learning: Mediation strategies applied to social networking tools. Online J Distance Learn Administration v12 n4 Win 2009, retrieved 14 Febuary 2011; Available from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter124/joyce124.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frieden, L., Winnegar, A. Opportunities for research to improve employment for people with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord 50, 379–381 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.38
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.38
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Bridges of perspectives: representation of people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in editorial boards and peer review
Research Integrity and Peer Review (2023)
-
Predicting change in labour market participation of people with spinal cord injury (SCI): longitudinal evidence from the Swiss SCI community survey
Spinal Cord (2022)
-
Current Approaches in Telehealth and Telerehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury (TeleSCI)
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports (2022)
-
Labor market participation of individuals with spinal cord injury living in Switzerland: determinants of between-person differences and counterfactual evaluation of their instrumental value for policy
Spinal Cord (2021)
-
Factors associated with labor market participation of persons with traumatic SCI in Switzerland: analyzing the predictive power of social background, health, functional independence, and the environment
Spinal Cord (2020)