Abstract
Blade cut-out is a common complication when using proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Although cement augmentation has been introduced to overcome the cut-out effect, the micromechanics of this approach remain to be clarified. While previous studies have developed finite element (FE) models based on lab-prepared or cadaveric samples to study the cement-trabeculae interface, their demanding nature and inherent disadvantages limit their application. The aim of this study was to develop a novel 'one-step forming' method for creating a cement-trabeculae interface FE model to investigate its micromechanics in relation to PFNA with cement augmentation. A human femoral head was scanned using micro-computed tomography, and four volume of interest (VOI) trabeculae were segmented. The VOI trabeculae were enclosed within a box to represent the encapsulated region of bone cement using ANSYS software. Tetrahedral meshing was performed with Hypermesh software based on Boolean operation. Finally, four cement-trabeculae interface FE models comprising four interdigitated depths and five FE models comprising different volume fraction were established after element removal. The effects of friction contact, frictionless contact, and bond contact properties between the bone and cement were identified. The maximum micromotion and stress in the interdigitated and loading bones were quantified and compared between the pre- and post-augmentation situations. The differences in micromotion and stress with the three contact methods were minimal. Micromotion and stress decreased as the interdigitation depth increased. Stress in the proximal interdigitated bone showed a correlation with the bone volume fraction (R2 = 0.70); both micromotion (R2 = 0.61) and stress (R2 = 0.93) at the most proximal loading region exhibited a similar correlation tendency. When comparing the post- and pre-augmentation situations, micromotion reduction in the interdigitated bone was more effective than stress reduction, particularly near the cement border. The cementation resulted in a significant reduction in micromotion within the loading bone, while the decrease in stress was minimal. Noticeable gradients of displacement and stress reduction can be observed in models with lower bone volume fraction (BV/TV). In summary, cement augmentation is more effective at reducing micromotion rather than stress. Furthermore, the reinforcing impact of bone cement is particularly prominent in cases with a low BV/TV. The utilization of bone cement may contribute to the stabilization of trabecular bone and PFNA primarily by constraining micromotion and partially shielding stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The initial stability of bone cement is of interest in many orthopaedic procedures, including treatments for proximal femur and vertebral fragility fractures as well as total hip/knee replacements. This is because bone cement enhances the interface stability between the implant and osteoporotic trabecular tissue, thereby reducing the risk of implant loosening and subsequent revision operations1,2,3,4,5. Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) has become the preferred intramedullary fixation technique for treating intertrochanteric fractures. However, as the number of cases increases, so does the incidence of fixation-related complications such as blade cut-out, which is reported to occur in approximately 2–15% of cases6,7. (Fig. 1A).
Cement-augmented PFNA has been proposed for over a decade since its first clinical application8 (Fig. 1B). The biomechanical benefits of bone cement augmentation, such as prevention of cut-out, rotation of the femoral head, and resistance to fatigue, have been demonstrated, as exemplified by PFNA, which employs a helical blade and later-injected cement volume9,10,11. In a previous study simulating cement-augmented PFNA for the treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures, we found that bone cement effectively enhanced the stability of PFNA and reduced the risk of cut-out by dispersing and transferring stress from the blade tip to both the nail and femoral shaft12. Clinically, even with a higher tip apex distance or calcar-referenced tip apex distance, augmenting the PFNA blade has the advantage of preventing reoperations by strengthening the osteosynthetic construct to resist symptomatic implant migration13,14. Furthermore, cement-augmented PFNA significantly increases the post-operative loading rate, which describes the force with which the foot strikes the ground during walking and combines two variables: mobility and pain15. Besides, cement augmentation reportedly carries a low risk of negative biological side effects, including pressure/temperature-induced avascular necrosis, because limited cement amounts are injected at low pressure16,17,18. The safety of the procedure has been demonstrated in terms of preventing cement leakage into the joint, minimizing mechanical failures like cut-out, reducing mortality rates, and decreasing post-operative complications19.
Although the technique of cement-augmented PFNA has been successfully introduced in macro-biomechanical tests and clinical studies to increase the stability of osteoporotic femoral heads, the mechanism of cement augmentation at a smaller trabecular dimension remains unclear. This can be understood by simulating the interaction between trabeculae and bone cement using the finite element method (FEM). The FEM is a computer-based method used to predict how an object will respond to specific physical conditions, such as loading or heat transfer, in the real world. This is achieved by dividing the object into finite discrete elements, each with its own mathematical equation that describes its mechanical behaviour. The FEM has been extensively used to study the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone under various loading conditions and examine the distribution of stresses, displacements, or strains within the bone structure.
Previously, researchers utilized the FEM to observe cement-trabeculae interactions and quantify the strain shielding of cement at the trabecular scale, using lab-prepared or post-mortem-retrieved samples from the cement-trabeculae interface in total knee arthroplasty20,21,22,23,24,25. However, these interface samples introduce inherent limitations or errors into the analysis. First, the demanding nature of modelling cement–bone interface limits the number of specimens that can be tested, validated, and modelled. Second, micro- and macro-gaps between the cement and trabeculae have frequently been discovered20,26,27, and there is room for improvement in terms of accuracy in mechanical analysis. Third, in order to investigate pre- and postoperative differentiation in osteolysis accurately, it is necessary to manually fill the cavity that are time-consuming20. Fourth, when utilizing micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanning for investigation purposes, there is a significant overlap between the global thresholds of trabeculae and bone cement26,28; investigators have to manually segment the cement layer and trabeculae, which could potentially introduce additional artificial interference by unintentionally altering the original structure of trabeculae. Therefore, a user-friendly, universal, and accurate model of cement-trabeculae needs to be developed for further investigation.
In this study, we developed a finite element (FE) model of the cement-trabeculae interface without using lab-prepared or post-mortem retrieved specimens. The FE models were theoretically free from the aforementioned disadvantages and were used to determine: (1) how micromotion and stress vary within the interdigitated trabeculae at the cement-trabeculae interface; (2) whether the interdigitated trabecular bone is constrained in terms of micromotion or shielded in terms of stress compared to the bone distal to the interface; and (3) what extent of micromotion constraint or stress shielding exists at the cement–bone interface compared to non-augmented bone.
Methods
Sample preparation and micro-CT scanning
We recruited an 83-year-old man who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture caused by a sideways fall. The subject provided informed consent and signed it prior to participating in this study. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (approval number: JY 2019-101). All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
The right femoral head was extracted during hip hemiarthroplasty, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 72 h, and then scanned using micro-CT (SkyScan 1276; Bruker, USA. https://blue-scientific.com/bruker-micro-ct-software/) at 42 μm resolution. The X-ray source voltage of micro-CT was set to 100 kV, and the current was set to 200 μA. A rotation step as low as 0.8° was selected to obtain the finest resolution. Based on the micro-CT images, 8-bit bitmaps of every cross-section along the femoral neck axis were reconstructed using the bundled Nrecon software, version 1.7.1 (Bruker, USA). Subsequently, the Dataviewer 1.5.6 (Bruker, USA) software was employed to orient the cross-sectional images perpendicular to the main compressive trabecular direction in the femoral head. Finally, a global threshold of 45–255 was chosen to segment the trabecular bone using the CTAn 1.16.8 (Bruker, USA) software. Four quadrangular prism trabecular samples with dimensions of 3 × 3 × 4 mm were randomly obtained from the domain of the femoral head as the volume of interest (VOI). The VOI axis was aligned with the main compressive trabecular direction (Fig. 1C, D). The VOI trabecular quadrangular prisms were saved in a ‘stl’ file format for subsequent FE model generation, and their bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was recorded.
Pre- and post-augmentation FE model generation
To eliminate disconnected elements in the VOI trabeculae, which can result in modeling and calculation failures, optimization techniques such as smoothing, mesh reduction, and remeshing were implemented using Geomagic studio 2013 (GEOMAGIC, USA. https://oqton.com/geomagic-wrap/). The optimizations were carefully performed to reduce noise while preserving the original trabecular structure as much as possible. The refined trabecular samples were saved as 'stl' files. Subsequently, the trabecular sample was wrapped in an enclosure box with dimensions of 3.01 × 3.01 × 4.01 mm, representing the original encapsulated region of bone cement, using the SpaceClaim module of ANSYS software, version 19.0 (ANSYS, USA. https://www.ansys.com/). The enclosure box and trabecular sample were converted to solid components and saved as ‘stl’ files (Fig. 2A). Two-dimensional (2D) surface and three-dimensional (3D) tetrahedral meshing were executed sequentially using Hypermesh 14.0 (Altair, USA. https://altair.com/hypermesh). Specifically, the cement region (enclosure box) was tetrahedrally meshed by the Boolean logic operation while keeping the 2D trabecular surface active during the meshing process. After tetrahedrally meshing the trabecular bone volume, a portion of volumetric cement elements were removed from the proximal region to establish a FE model of cement-trabeculae interface with four interdigitated depths (IDs), including 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2 mm (Fig. 2B). The elements were all kept as first-order elements. To assess the changes in micromotion and stress induced by cementation, the blank trabecular samples were duplicated and saved as pre-augmentation specimens following optimization management but prior to the enclosure procedure. Further, five additional FE model of cement-trabeculae interface with different BV/TV were also established to assess the micromotion and stress changes.
Due to variations in the IDs and trabecular structure, the total number of elements in the cement-trabeculae interface (post-augmentation) models ranged from 2.29 to 4.27 million with 0.42 to 0.75 million nodes. The element density was kept sufficiently high for an accurate representation of the trabecular bone microstructure. The average element size for all models was set to 0.04 mm, because the convergence test suggested that a size of 0.04 mm was sufficient22 (Fig. 3A).
Boundary condition and loading
Boundary condition and loading setting were operated in Hypermesh 14.0 software. The bottom surface of cement-trabeculae interface model was fully constrained in all degrees of freedom while while a uniaxial static load was applied to the top surface of trabecular bone. Linear elastic and isotropic material properties were assumed in the FE models. The Young’s moduli of the cement and trabecular elements were set at 3 and 14 GPa28, respectively. A Poisson’s ratio of 0.3 was applied for both cement and bone. Friction, frictionless, and bond contact were established to compare the effect of the interfacial properties between the cement and bone, where friction contact with a coefficient of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and frictionless contact were modelled as double-sided segment-to-segment contact without friction26,30. All FE models, including pre- and post-augmentation models, were subjected to a uniaxial static compression load of 1 MPa, which is equivalent to one body weight20. All the simulations were performed on the Optistruct module of the Hypermesh 14.0 software. The micromotion and von Mises stress of the trabeculae were exported and saved after calculation using Hyperview module in Hypermesh 14.0.
Definition of regions of interest (ROI) in the interdigitated bone
To enable the post-processing of micromotion and stress, the interdigitated bone was divided into serial ROIs with equal thickness of 0.1 mm (denoted as ROI-I), while the loading bone was divided into segments with a thickness of 0.5 mm (denoted as ROI-L). The ROIs were numbered from the cement border to the double distal end (Fig. 3B) and defined in both post-augmentation and pre-augmentation models to facilitate comparison. The maximum micromotion and von Mises stress were recorded from each ROI, and the values for ROI-I and ROI-L were respectively defined as functions of their corresponding ID and loading height. Specifically, the cut-off values for the upper 95th percentile (i.e. top 5%) of micromotion and stress in each ROI were defined to represent the maximum levels31,32. In more detail, all micromotion and von Mises data points were exported from each ROI and sorted in descending order. The maximum value of the top 5% were then extracted for further statistical analysis. The micromotion and stress of the interdigitated bone were also compared with those in the loading bone.
Results
Effect of contact method
The ROI-I 1, which refers to the interdigitated bone closest to the cement border, was utilized as a reference for comparison among all samples. The impact of various contact methods, including friction coefficients of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7, frictionless contact, and bonding at the interface between cement and trabeculae on maximum micromotion and stress is illustrated in Fig. 4. From sample 1 (ID = 0.5 mm) to sample 4 (ID = 2 mm), the maximum difference in micromotion due to the three contact methods and coefficient was found to be 4.27%, 2.40%, 2.34%, and 1.62% respectively, while the maximum difference in stress was found to be 1.05%, 2.54%, 2.78%, and 1.34% respectively. The findings suggest that the contact method employed did not have a significant impact on the mechanical behaviour of the cement–bone interface. Consequently, we opted to utilize a frictionless contact method for subsequent analyses, aligning with previous studies21,23,26.
Distribution of micromotion in interdigitated trabeculae
Trabecular micromotion decreased from the proximal to the distal interdigitated bone, as shown in the FE contour plot (Fig. 5A). The micromotion in each ROI-I, as a function of the ID, showed that deeper regions within the cement layer had lower micromotion (Fig. 6A). In ROI-I 1, variations in micromotion were observed among four cement-trabeculae models. However, these variations did not appear to correlate with changes in BV/TV (R2 = 0.02); samples with lower BV/TV values displayed less micromotion at the contact interface. The micromotion in each ROI was assessed using one-way ANOVA and demonstrated significant differences compared to the other regions (P < 0.05). This observation was consistent across all samples.
Distribution of stress in interdigitated trabeculae
The stress in the interdigitated trabeculae exhibited a similar decreasing trend from the proximal to the distal region for each sample. The stress patterns of all four samples were compared, and a decreasing trend was observed with increasing ID (Fig. 5B). Within each sample, it was expected that the interdigitated bone stress would decrease as the cement-mantle thickness increased (Fig. 6B). In contrast to the micromotion trend, when observing the stress at ROI-I 1, there was a tendency for stress to increase with decreasing BV/TV (R2 = 0.70), suggesting that bone quantity may impact load transfer in this region.
Interdigitated and loading bone micromotion
The micromotion data from all regions of the interdigitated bone indicated that the interdigitated bone was micromotion-constrained compared with the loading bone. The constraint effect increased with the ID, with a more evident micromotion difference observed in the distal ROI-I (Fig. 7A). The distal loading bone (near the cement border) was also micromotion-constrained compared with the proximal loading bone. A thinner cement mantle corresponded to a higher micromotion gradient in the loading bone. Additionally, there was a strong correlation between the micromotion of the most proximal ROI-L n (R2 = 0.61) and the BV/TV in comparison to ROI-L 1 (R2 = 0.03).
Interdigitated and loading bone stresses
In accordance with the variation of micromotion, the stress data obtained from all interdigitated bone regions exhibited a noticeable trend of stress shielding in comparison to the loading bone. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between the degree of stress shielding and ID (Fig. 7B). The stress variation between the interdigitated and loading bones exhibited a lower magnitude, as indicated by the slope of the curves, compared to that of micromotion variation. The distal loading bone (near the cement border) was also stress-shielded compared with the proximal loading bone. There was a strong correlation between the stress of the most proximal ROI-L n (R2 = 0.93) and the BV/TV in comparison to ROI-L 1 (R2 = 0.22).
Micromotion and stress variations between pre- and post-augmentation models
Figure 8 shows the micromotion and stress in the interdigitated bone in the pre- and post-augmentation situations. The micromotion and stress of the proximal ROI were higher than those of the more distal ROI, indicating that there was micromotion constraint and stress shielding in the most distal region. The reduction of micromotion in the interdigitated bone is superior to stress reduction, particularly in the regions adjacent to the cement border, exhibiting maximum percentage decreases of 70.1%, 55.6%, 38.1%, and 62.5% for the four samples, respectively.
The micromotion and stress in the loading bone before and after cementation are illustrated in Fig. 9. Cementation resulted in a significant reduction in micromotion within the loading bone, while the decrease in stress was minimal. This asymmetrical reduction suggests that the strengthening effect of bone cement on the loading bone may rely on constraining micromotion.
Effect of BV/TV on micromotion and stress variations in interdigitated bone
The present study developed additional cement-trabeculae interface models with varying BV/TV values (0.179, 0.225, 0.278, 0.302 and 0.366) to investigate the micromotion and stress variations in interdigitated bone. With lower BV/TV, trabeculae are more susceptible to deformation and stress concentration, particularly those near the cement border (Fig. 10). The presence of micromotion and stress in interdigitated bone both before and after cement augmentation indicates that trabeculae with a lower BV/TV exhibit greater sensitivity towards this procedure, as evidenced by a significant reduction in micromotion and stress levels (Fig. 11). These findings suggest that individuals with lower bone mass may benefit from more effective mechanical support provided by bone cement augmentation.
Discussion
This study introduces user-friendly, universal, and accurate finite element (FE) models to investigate the micromechanics of the cement-trabeculae interface. The aim is to microscopically elucidate the mechanism of treating intertrochanteric fractures with cement-augmented PFNA. Samples with varying cement IDs and BV/TV were used to study the effect of bone morphology on micromotion and stress. "One-step forming" refers to automatically filling cement elements without a lab-prepared or cadaveric cement-bone sample. Our study revealed that both micromotion and stress decreased when moving away from the cement implant, with the highest micromotion and stress observed at the cement border due to cement interdigitation. Although there is a lack of experimental or computational verification for the femoral head cement-trabeculae interface, our results are consistent with previous findings from lab-prepared specimens33 and FE simulations20,28 on proximal tibial trabeculae, where similar magnitudes of micromotion were measured. In clinical practice, little attention has been given to the role of the implant–cement interface due to its strength and infrequent fixation failure. Instead, failures such as secondary micro fracture of trabecuale, cement leakage, and osteolysis often occur at the cement-trabeculae interface. Therefore, this study focused solely on investigating the micromechanics of the cement-trabeculae interface without considering the implant.
The stress discrepancy could reach up to 19% when using the conventional lab-prepared or cadaveric cement–bone interface specimen, where a micro- or macro-gap between the bone and cement is inevitable26. A significant advantage of our model is the complete compaction (without any gap) between the bone and cement components, which was achieved through precise Boolean logic operations during the tetrahedral-element meshing stage. This meticulous control over artificial interference ensures that the results can be considered as optimal theoretical values. Another advantage is the convenient process of FE model development, where only micro-CT images of trabecular samples are required. These images can be obtained from discarded bone samples through surgical procedures (as proposed in this study), high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT scans on living bodies34, or experimental scans from animal samples. By eliminating the need for lab-preparation or pre-processing involving a mixture of cadaveric bone and cement, significant reductions in operation time can be achieved. In this study, the micromotion amplitude of the interdigitated bone in all models was found to be less than 5 um while the von Mises stress exhibited significant fluctuations due to varying volume fractions; however, all values remained below 15 MPa. Previous investigations involving cadaveric bone and FE analysis have consistently reported micromovement amplitudes ranging from 0 to 5 μm and von Mises stresses within a similar range20,21,22,28. The magnitudes of micromotion or stress observed in our study align with those documented in previous research, thus validating the accuracy of our model.
We initially examined the impact of contact properties between bone and cement. Some variations were observed in micromotion and stress near the cement border when comparing friction (with a coefficient of 0.3), frictionless, and bond contacts (Fig. 4). However, these differences were found to be insignificant, aligning with a previous study26, indicating that the interdigitation of cement and trabecular bones predominantly governs the micromechanics at the PFNA cement interface. A prior investigation revealed that the influence of frictional contact is more pronounced during tension or shearing, where the interface exhibits greater compliance. The larger effect of using different contact properties at the cement–bone interface may be due to their cyclic loading mode as well as differences in the level of model detail, such as cube size and ID30,35. Reaming results in fewer trabeculae remaining in the femoral marrow cavity during cemented total hip replacement. Studies revealed that the presence of interfacial grooves, rather than interdigitation, plays a crucial role in promoting bonding, and enhancing the longevity of cemented hip prosthesis36,37.
A study investigating the alignment of femoral head cement-trabeculae composites with the main compressive trabecular direction revealed that at low BV/TV, the properties of the composite are predominantly influenced by cement, whereas at high BV/TV, the contribution of trabecular bone becomes more apparent, indicating a positive correlation between BV/TV and in-axis modulus27. In our study, we did not observe a significant correlation (R2 = 0.02) between the BV/TV and micromotion in the augmented trabeculae near the cement border; however, there was a significant correlation (R2 = 0.70) between stress and BV/TV. The observed micromotion trend contradicts previous findings, which reported higher micromotion at the contact interface for specimens with a lower BV/TV ratio28. This could be attributed to the following factors: (1) The trabecular specimens in the previous study were randomly obtained from the proximal tibia, which differs from our femoral head trabeculae in terms of their structural alignment with the main trabecular direction. It is well-known that site-specific differences in bone structure significantly influence the material properties of human trabecular bone38,39; (2) Random error may have occurred due to a small sample size (n = 4); and (3) The loading and boundary directions were completely reversed. However, the most proximal loading bone exhibited a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.61) between BV/TV and micromotion, as well as a significant correlation (R2 = 0.93) between BV/TV and stress. It is expected that the microstructure (i.e., BV/TV) would influence micromotion or stress in the loading bone; however, it is not anticipated that BV/TV would significantly impact micromotion or stress in the interdigitated bone. These asymmetrical findings suggest that cement augmentation modifies the mechanical behavior of bone-cement composites, potentially due to constraints on micromotion.
The influence of micromotion constraint was more pronounced in the loading and interdigitated bone under pre- and post-augmentation conditions.
When a thicker cement mantle was present, the most distal bone was completely encapsulated in the cement. In clinic, the optimal dosage of bone cement injection remains a subject of debate: an insufficient dose fails to enhance stability, while an excessive dose may give rise to various complications associated with bone cement (such as thermal injury, femoral head necrosis, delayed fracture healing, etc.). Studies have demonstrated that a dosage of 4.2 mL of bone cement is deemed appropriate and has been clinically established as the standard injection dose for bone cement augmentation. Furthermore, biomechanical analysis has indicated that the utilization of 4.2 mL of bone cement can effectively enhance the stability of intramedullary nails. Importantly, it should be noted that the elevation in temperature and pressure within the femoral head resulting from the application of 4.2 mL cement does not lead to femoral head necrosis40,41,42,43. In this study, we devised various IDs to simulate a clinical scenario involving the application of different quantities of bone cement. It is evident that as the amount of bone cement increases (i.e., with larger ID), there is a corresponding decrease in displacement and deformation of the interdigitated bones, indicating greater stability in the trabecular structure. These findings were corroborated through biomechanical test and a long-term prospective multicentre trial14,44.
Compared to pre-augmentation, the reduction curves of interdigitated bone micromotion exhibited a slight slope as the ID increased, while the stress reduction curves maintained a consistent slope similar to that observed before augmentation (Fig. 8). This implies that cement augmentation has a greater impact on reducing micromotion compared to stress reduction. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in micromotion between the loading bone before and after augmentation, whereas the disparity in stress appeared to be minimal (Fig. 9). The stress distribution in the loading bone is not significantly altered by cement augmentation. The asymmetrical effect observed after cement augmentation may be attributed to the unchanged trabecular structure and loading transmission route caused by the presence of a cement mantle, which restricts horizontal trabecular displacement.
The results presented in Fig. 11 demonstrate pronounced gradients of displacement and stress reduction following bone cement augmentation, particularly in cases with lower BV/TV values. This observation indicates the remarkable efficacy of bone cement augmentation for individuals with decreased bone mass11. Considering the macro biomechanical aspect, bone cement exhibits exceptional efficiency in managing unstable intertrochanteric fractures by generating substantial displacement and stress reduction gradients, and significantly enhancing resistance against cut-out complications12.
While bone cement provides initial stable fixation, it also leads to strain shielding of the trabeculae that interdigitate with the cement28,45. This strain-shielding effect may result in compromised interlocking and long-term aseptic loosening between the cement and trabeculae in vivo20,33,46. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of aseptic loosening of cement-augmented PFNA, possibly due to concerns regarding cement-related complications and its limited utilization owing to the requirement for a specially designed blade8,9. Considering the micromotion-constraint effect observed in our study, future reports of aseptic loosening might emerge as cement-augmented PFNA becomes more commonplace.
Limitations
By incorporating cement directly into the model, an optimal representation of the cement-trabecular interface can be achieved. However, it should be noted that this technique is most suitable for the initial stage of bone cement injection and when there are no gaps present within the trabecular space after complete filling with cement. In fact, varying degrees of osteolysis and the formation of gaps at the cement-trabecular interface can be observed, potentially leading to an overestimation of the actual outcomes based on our model's numerical results. Due to the limited number of samples in our study, a comprehensive determination of the influence of morphological characteristics on interface properties could not be achieved. Analysing additional samples would provide more information regarding the impact of bone morphology and cement ID. The femoral head cement-bone composite primarily withstands compressive forces, although shear forces and/or a combination of shear and compression forces may be anticipated depending on the specific location within the interface in the femoral head. For this study, only compressive loads were considered as they represent the primary load pattern. Nevertheless, since the PFNA blade effectively compacts trabecular tissue in the femoral head47,48, additional models of cement-bone interfaces need to be developed to elucidate the impact of cement-augmented PFNA on compacted trabecular tissue.
Conclusion
User-friendly, universal, and accurate cement-trabeculae interface FE models were developed to investigate the micromechanics of cement-augmented PFNA. Our findings indicate that: (1) the cement and trabecular bone interlock with each other; (2) micromotion and stress decrease as the ID increases. Stress at the proximal interdigitated bone is influenced by bone volume fraction (BV/TV), while both micromotion and stress at the most proximal loading region show dependence on BV/TV; (3) comparing the post- and pre-augmentation situations, micromotion reduction in the interdigitated bone is superior to stress reduction, especially in the regions near the cement border. Cementation significantly reduces micromotion in the loading bone but only marginally reduces stress. In summary, our data suggest that cement augmentation primarily controls micromotion rather than stress. This highlights the potential effectiveness of cement-augmented PFNA for controlling implant stability through minimizing micromotions.
Data availability
Data is provided within the manuscript.
References
Wang, Y. et al. Layered double hydroxide modified bone cement promoting osseointegration via multiple osteogenic signal pathways. ACS Nano 15, 9732–9745. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c00461 (2021).
Parker, M. J., Johansen, A. & Griffiths, R. Bone cement and hip fractures. Injury 52, 1655–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.004 (2021).
Monzon, R. A., Coury, J. G., Disse, G. D. & Lum, Z. C. Bone cement in total hip and knee arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 7, e6. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00031 (2019).
Sonalal Prasad, C. & Rajesh, G. Low viscosity versus high viscosity PMMA bone cement for total joint arthroplasty: Influence of glass transition temperature, residual monomer content, transmittance of chemical functional groups, and crystallinity index on quasi-static flexural strength. Forces Mech. 10, 100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmec.2023.100176 (2023).
Kumar, A., Mondal, S. & Ghosh, R. Biomechanical performance of the cemented acetabular cup with combined effects of bone quality, implant material combinations and bodyweight. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H 236, 1309–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119221113698 (2022).
Liu, W., Liu, J. & Ji, G. Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 500. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02031-8 (2020).
Parker, M. J. & Handoll, H. H. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD000093, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub5 (2010).
Kammerlander, C. et al. Standardised cement augmentation of the PFNA using a perforated blade: A new technique and preliminary clinical results. A prospective multicentre trial. Injury-Int. J. Care Injured 42, 1484–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.07.010 (2011).
Sermon, A. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of bone-cement augmented Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades in a polyurethane foam model with low density. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.006 (2012).
Sermon, A. et al. Potential of polymethylmethacrylate cement-augmented helical proximal femoral nail antirotation blades to improve implant stability: A biomechanical investigation in human cadaveric femoral heads. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72, E54–E59. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31821852ed (2012).
Sermon, A. et al. Bone cement augmentation of femoral nail head elements increases their cut-out resistance in poor bone quality? A biomechanical study. J. Biomech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110301 (2021).
Zheng, L. et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of two intertrochanteric fractures: A comparative finite element study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 22, 1010. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04878-2 (2021).
Kammerlander, C. et al. Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA): A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury 49, 1436–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022 (2018).
Kammerlander, C. et al. Long-term results of the augmented PFNA: A prospective multicenter trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1902-7 (2014).
Keppler, A. M. et al. Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA) is associated with enhanced weight-bearing in older adults. Injury 52, 3042–3046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.037 (2021).
Scola, A., Gebhard, F., Dehner, C. & Roderer, G. The PFNA(R) augmented in revision surgery of proximal femur fractures. Open Orthop J 8, 232–236. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010232 (2014).
Blankstein, M. et al. Assessment of intraosseous femoral head pressures during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femur nail antirotation blade. J Orthop Trauma 28, 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000069 (2014).
Boner, V., Kuhn, P., Mendel, T. & Gisep, A. Temperature evaluation during PMMA screw augmentation in osteoporotic bone: An in vitro study about the risk of thermal necrosis in human femoral heads. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90, 842–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31353 (2009).
Schuetze, K. et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: Is it safe?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03531-2 (2021).
Srinivasan, P., Miller, M. A., Verdonschot, N., Mann, K. A. & Janssen, D. A modelling approach demonstrating micromechanical changes in the tibial cemented interface due to in vivo service. J Biomech 56, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.017 (2017).
Srinivasan, P., Miller, M. A., Verdonschot, N., Mann, K. A. & Janssen, D. Experimental and computational micromechanics at the tibial cement-trabeculae interface. J Biomech 49, 1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.054 (2016).
Zhang, Q. H., Tozzi, G. & Tong, J. Micro-mechanical damage of trabecular bone-cement interface under selected loading conditions: A finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 17, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.675057 (2014).
Tozzi, G., Zhang, Q. H. & Tong, J. 3D real-time micromechanical compressive behaviour of bone-cement interface: Experimental and finite element studies. J Biomech 45, 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.011 (2012).
Waanders, D., Janssen, D., Mann, K. A. & Verdonschot, N. The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement-bone interface. J Biomech 43, 3028–3034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.031 (2010).
Mann, K. A., Miller, M. A., Cleary, R. J., Janssen, D. & Verdonschot, N. Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface. J Orthop Res 26, 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20575 (2008).
Zhao, Y., Robson Brown, K. A., Jin, Z. M. & Wilcox, R. K. Trabecular level analysis of bone cement augmentation: A comparative experimental and finite element study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40, 2168–2176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0587-3 (2012).
Sas, A., Helgason, B., Ferguson, S. J. & van Lenthe, G. H. Mechanical and morphological characterization of PMMA/bone composites in human femoral heads. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 115, 104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104247 (2021).
Srinivasan, P., Miller, M. A., Verdonschot, N., Mann, K. A. & Janssen, D. Strain shielding in trabecular bone at the tibial cement-bone interface. J Mech Behav Biomed 66, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.11.006 (2017).
Shin, Y. S., Chae, J. E., Kang, T. W. & Han, S. B. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II. Injury 48, 1550–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.011 (2017).
Janssen, D., Mann, K. A. & Verdonschot, N. Micro-mechanical modeling of the cement-bone interface: the effect of friction, morphology and material properties on the micromechanical response. J Biomech 41, 3158–3163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.020 (2008).
Yang, H., Xu, X., Bullock, W. & Main, R. P. Adaptive changes in micromechanical environments of cancellous and cortical bone in response to in vivo loading and disuse. J Biomech 89, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.021 (2019).
Yang, H. et al. Characterization of cancellous and cortical bone strain in the in vivo mouse tibial loading model using microCT-based finite element analysis. Bone 66, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.05.019 (2014).
Miller, M. A., Goodheart, J. R., Khechen, B., Janssen, D. & Mann, K. A. Changes in microgaps, micromotion, and trabecular strain from interlocked cement-trabecular bone interfaces in total knee replacements with in vivo service. J Orthop Res 34, 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23109 (2016).
Du, J., Li, S. & Silberschmidt, V. V. Remodelling of trabecular bone in human distal tibia: A model based on an in-vivo HR-pQCT study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 119, 104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104506 (2021).
Miller, M. A. et al. Multi-axial loading micromechanics of the cement-bone interface in postmortem retrievals and lab-prepared specimens. J Mech Behav Biomed 4, 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.11.004 (2011).
Ajay, K., Pankaj, S., Rajeev, K. & Rajesh, G. Experimental investigation of the effect of bone surface macro-groove preparation on the strength of bone-cement interface. Mater. Today Commun. 28, 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102702 (2021).
Mootanah, R., Dowell, J. K., Cheah, K., Ingle, P. & Shelton, J. C. Configuration of anchorage holes affects fixation of the acetabular component in cemented total hip replacement–a finite element study. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 10, 439–445 (2007).
Morgan, E. F. & Keaveny, T. M. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 (2001).
Morgan, E. F., Bayraktar, H. H. & Keaveny, T. M. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36, 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00071-x (2003).
von der Linden, P. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. J. Orthop. Res. 24, 2230–2237 (2006).
Mattsson, P. et al. Resorbable cement for the augmentation of internally-fixed unstable trochanteric fractures: A prospective, randomised multicentre study. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. 87, 1203–1209 (2005).
Lindner, T. et al. Fractures of the hip and osteoporosis: The role of bone substitutes. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. 91, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21273 (2009).
Boner, V., Kuhn, P., Mendel, T. & Gisep, A. Temperature evaluation during PMMA screw augmentation in osteoporotic bone: An in vitro study about the risk of thermal necrosis in human femoral heads. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 90, 842–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31353 (2009).
Sermon, A., Hofmann-Fliri, L., Richards, R. G., Flamaing, J. & Windolf, M. Cement augmentation of hip implants in osteoporotic bone: how much cement is needed and where should it go?. J Orthop Res 32, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22522 (2014).
Zhang, Q. H., Cossey, A. & Tong, J. Stress shielding in bone of a bone-cement interface. Med Eng Phys 38, 423–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.01.009 (2016).
Miller, M. A. et al. Loss of cement-bone interlock in retrieved tibial components from total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472, 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3248-4 (2014).
Simmermacher, R. K. et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: Results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 39, 932–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.005 (2008).
Mereddy, P., Kamath, S., Ramakrishnan, M., Malik, H. & Donnachie, N. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 40, 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.014 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Lingnan Medical Research Center of Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine for providing equipment.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82374469); National Famous Old Chinese Medicine Expert Inheritance Studio Construction Project (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YL and LZ Conceived and designed the overall study workflow, analyzed the data, authored and reviewed drafts of the manuscript, and approved the final draft. SL and ZZ aided in data analyses, prepared the figures and tables. ZL and WM Supervised the whole work, and approved the final draft. All authors contributed, discussed, and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Zheng, L., Li, S. et al. Finite element study on the micromechanics of cement-augmented proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for intertrochanteric fracture treatment. Sci Rep 14, 10322 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61122-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61122-2
Keywords
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.