Abstract
Previous studies have shown that metabolites play an important role in phenotypic regulation. However, the causal relationship between metabolites and multiple myeloma has not been adequately investigated. Here, we attempt to explore the causal effects of genetically determined blood metabolites on multiple myeloma. The large-scale public blood metabolites and multiple myeloma datasets from independently published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were used to explore the causal relationship between each genetically determined blood metabolite and multiple myeloma through inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger and mode-based estimation methods. Sensitivity tests were performed to evaluate the stability and reliability of the results by MR-Egger regression and leave-one-out methods. Metabolic pathway analysis was further explored using filtered data. Statistical analyses were all performed in R. Among 452 metabolites, ten known metabolites and three unknown metabolites had significant causal relationship with multiple myeloma (Pā<ā0.05). Four known metabolites, 3-methyl-2-oxovalenate, oxidized bilirubin, isovalerylcarnitine and glutamine carnitine, reached statistical significance in IVW models. Metabolic pathways analysis identified four significant pathways. The occurrence of multiple myeloma may have a causal relationship with these four metabolites, and there are four metabolic pathways that are also related to the occurrence of multiple myeloma. This can provide new ideas for exploring early screening and treatment of multiple myeloma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by malignant proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow, accompanied by the secretion of monoclonal immunoglobulins. The disease accounts for 10% of all hematologic malignancies1. Despite substantial improvements in multiple myeloma therapies in the past 10ā15 years, the 5-year relative survival rate is 55.6%2 and the median overall survival (OS) has improved to over 8āyears3. But in 15ā20% of patients the aggressive course of MM leads to death within the first 3 years from diagnosis4. Traditional chemotherapy is highly resistant and relapsed, and the advent of newer drugs has prolonged survival, but overall multiple myeloma remains incurable5. Therefore, it is important to investigate new targets for screening, prevention and treatment of multiple myeloma.
Metabolites in the blood can, to some extent, reflect an individual's genetic makeup and can therefore be used to predict or influence the onset and progression of disease6. Common genetic metabotypes play a role as discriminatory cofactors in the aetiology of common multifactorial diseases. Interacting with environmental factors such as diet or lifestyle, these metabotypes may influence an individual's susceptibility to certain phenotypes7. Genetic variants in metabolism-related genes that lead to specific and distinct metabolic phenotypes, which we call 'genetically determined metabotypes'8. Currently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a number of metabolite-associated loci in adult human blood and/or urine samples that have been shown to be associated with the development and prognosis of cardiovascular9,10, endocrine11, gastrointestinal12, respiratory13 and oncological14 diseases. But few studies have focused on the relationship between blood metabolites and multiple myeloma. Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful method of epidemiologic research that essentially uses genetic variation as an instrumental variables (IVs) to identify causal relationships between risk factors and disease15. Genome-wide association studies (mGWAS) are a metabolomics-based approach to understanding disease-associated genetic variation by identifying genetic trait loci for metabolites16. Using this approach to investigate the causal relationship between blood metabolites and multiple myeloma may provide insight into multiple myeloma and new ideas for early detection and treatment of multiple myeloma.
In summary, this study combines metabolomics and genomics, through Mendelian randomization analysis, using large-scale mGWAS data as the exposure file and multiple myeloma GWAS data as the outcome file, to investigate the causal relationship between blood metabolites and multiple myeloma. This study also screens for relevant blood metabolites, and provides new ideas for early detection and treatment of multiple myeloma.
Methods
Data sources
Blood metabolite data were obtained from the Shin17 et al.'s mGWAS analysis study published in Nature Genetics in 2014, the largest genome-wide association study (mGWAS) of blood metabolites to date, pooling data from 7824 Europeans, including approximately 2.1 million single nucleotide polymorphisms, and 452 blood metabolites (GWAS ID: met-a). Multiple myeloma data from Burrows et al. 2021 Genome-wide association analysis data from UK Biobank, containing 372,617 samples (601 cases and 372,016 control) and 8.6 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (GWAS ID: ieu-b-4957).
Conditions for SNP as an instrumental variable
ā Instrumental variables were highly correlated with exposure, and the strength of the SNP was assessed using the F statistic, and if Fā>ā10, the correlation between SNP and exposure was considered strong enough to insulate the results of the MR analysis from weak instrumental bias15. ā”Instrumental variables were not directly correlated with outcome and only influenced outcome through exposure, i.e. no genetic pleiotropy was present, which was detected by MR-Egger regression in this study. ā¢ The instrumental variables are not related to confounding. The SNPs selected for the MR method should obey Mendel's law of genetics, i.e. parental alleles are randomly assigned to offspring and are not influenced by acquired factors such as socio-economic factors, and are therefore relatively independent and can theoretically be considered independent of confounding factors18.
Selection of instrumental variables
Uniform criteria were set for SNP screening: ā Pā<ā5āĆā10ā8 as statistically significant for inclusion in the study; ā” linkage disequilibrium analysis with reference to the genotype of the European population (EUR) of the Thousand Genomes, which also needed to meet an LD threshold of r2ā<ā0.1 within 500 kb, retaining the single nucleotide polymorphism with the smallest P value.
Statistical analyses for MR
Investigating the causal relationship between each blood metabolite and multiple myeloma by using the TwoSampleMR package (version 0.5.6) in the R19. In this study, inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used20 as the primary causal association effect assessment method. IVW is a method for MR to Meta-summarize the effects of multiple loci when analyzing multiple SNPs. IVW is used to ensure that all SNPs are valid instrumental variables and are completely independent of each other. In addition, we used the weighted median method (WME)21, MR-Egger regression22, simple mode-based estimation23 and weighted mode-based estimation23 to test the reliability and stability of the results. When the estimates of the causal association effects obtained from the above five different MR models were similar, we could conclude that the causal association between the metabolite and multiple myeloma was reliable and stable. If only one SNP remains, use the Wald ratio method. We also performed multiple hypothesis testing, using Pā<ā1.10āĆā10ā4 (after Bonferroni correction) as the threshold indicating the presence of a direct causal association24 and 1.10āĆā10ā4ā<āPā<ā0.05 as a potential risk predictor for multiple myeloma. Heterogeneity tests and genetic pleiotropy tests were performed for causality for all metabolites with PIVWā<ā0.05. At the same time, we calculated odds ratios as well as the power to detect a significant result across a range of odds ratios to help interpret the results and improve reproducibility25.
Heterogeneity and sensitivity tests
Q-test for IVW and MR-Egger was used to detect potential violations of the assumption by the heterogeneity of the association between individual IVs. The included instrumental variables will be considered not heterogeneous when Pā>ā0.05. The default fixed-effects model was employed if no substantial heterogeneity (Pā>ā0.05) was observed; otherwise, the random-effects model was utilized26. MR-Egger was applied to estimate horizontal pleiotropy according to its intercept, ensuring that genetic variation was independently associated with exposure and outcome. When Pā>ā0.05, it will be considered that there is less likely genetic pleiotropy in the causal analysis. This study used the leave-one-out method to assess the likelihood of associations observed by individual SNP driver.
Metabolic pathway analysis
Following the MR analysis, we next used MetaboAnalyst5.0 software (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/faces/home.xhtml)27 to perform metabolic pathway analysis.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
No need for ethical approval as used of anonymous open data.
Results
Information on instrumental variables (SNP)
Of all 2.1 million SNPs from 452 metabolites, we found 880 SNPs that met the selection criteria for instrumental variables, which was listed in Table S1. After overlapping these SNPs with multiple myeloma GWAS data, 839 SNPs were ultimately included in the follow-up analysis. These could be seen in Table S2. The flow chart of MR study is shown in Fig. 1. The minimum F-statistic for all SNPs included in the follow-up analysis was 28.81, indicating that the instrumental variables for metabolites were sufficiently plausible (Fā>ā10).
MR analyses results
Of the 452 metabolites, thirteen metabolites were causally associated with multiple myeloma at a significant level (Pā<ā0.05), including ten known metabolites and three unknown metabolites, as detailed in Fig. 2. After Bonferroni correction (Pā<ā1.10āĆā10ā4), no metabolites were found that still had a significant effect.
Of the ten known metabolites, five may be associated with an increased risk of multiple myeloma: glutamine carnitine, isovalerylcarnitine, cysteine-glutathione disulfide, leucine and pelargonate; five may be associated with a decreased risk of multiple myeloma: 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate, oxidized bilirubin, 2-methylbutyroylcarnitine, indolelactate and lysine.
Heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis
Four metabolites that reached statistical significance in IVW models were tested for heterogeneity and gene pleiotropy. P-values for heterogeneity and gene pleiotropy were greater than 0.05, indicating that none of the metabolites had heterogeneity or gene pleiotropy. The relevant results are shown in Table 1.
Scatter plots of MR analysis results for the four metabolites are shown in Fig. 3.
The sensitivity analysis of the above four metabolites by the leave-one-out method was robust, with no single nucleotide polymorphisms in any of the metabolites significantly affecting the results. Forest plots of the leave-one-out results for the metabolites are shown in Fig. 4.
Metabolic pathway analysis
The ten metabolites screened were subjected to metabolic pathway analysis using MetaboAnalyst5.0 software and the results are shown in Fig. 5A. The metabolites were further subjected to KEGG pathway enrichment analysis and the results are shown in Fig. 5B, C. The metabolic pathway analysis showed that there were six metabolic pathways affecting multiple myeloma in the serum, four of which had statistically significant differences (Pā<ā0.05), as shown in Table 2.
Discussion
Of the 452 blood metabolites involved in this study, ten are potential predictors of multiple myeloma risk. Five metabolites were included that may be associated with an increased risk of developing multiple myeloma, namely glutamine carnitine, isovalerylcarnitine, cysteine-glutathione disulfide, leucine and pelargonate. The other five may be associated with a decreased risk of multiple myeloma: 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate, oxidized bilirubin, 2-methylbutyroylcarnitine, indolelactate and lysine. Four of these metabolites, glutamine carnitine, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate, isovalerylcarnitine and bilirubin oxide, reached statistical significance in IVW models.
The present study identified bilirubin oxide as a potential protective substance to reduce the risk of multiple myeloma. Li Volti et al.28 found that hematological malignancies exhibit an altered homeostasis of the redox balance, which can lead to the activation of various survival pathways that, in turn, lead to disease progression and chemoresistance. The heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway is thought to play an important role among these pathways. HO catalyzes enzymatic breakdown of heme, releasing carbon monoxide (CO), ferrous iron (Fe2+) and bilirubin oxide. As a degradation product of heme, bilirubin oxide inhibits the degradation of heme and thus the heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway. Raninga et al.29 also found that concurrent inhibition of HO-1 would improve therapeutic outcomes in MM patients.
Another metabolite that may reduce the risk of multiple myeloma is 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate, a branched-chain alpha-keto acid (BCKA) produced by the catabolism of isoleucine, which has been reported to be associated with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance30. In a study on the catabolic pathway of branched-chain amino acids, 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate was the strongest predictor of IFG among the identified intermediate metabolites, independent of glucose31. Abnormal amino acid metabolism is one of the important features of MM. The important metabolic pathway of amino acids participates in protein synthesis as basic raw materials32. It has been shown that the metabolism of branched-chain amino acids influences the prognosis of multiple myeloma33. When catabolism of branched-chain amino acids is impaired, blood levels of 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate are reduced, potentially increasing the risk of multiple myeloma.
Glutamine carnitine and isovalerylcarnitine are both acylcarnitines34. Carnitine and acylcarnitine are key substances in cellular energy metabolism and can be synthesized from amino acids in the human kidney and liver. Their physiological roles include acting as sole carriers of long-chain fatty acids, transporting long-chain fatty acid classes into the mitochondria for beta-oxidation, and regulating the intracellular balance between free and acyl coenzyme A. Characteristic changes in one or more acylcarnitines indicate abnormal beta-oxidation of fatty acids and abnormal metabolism of branched-chain amino acids35. It has been shown that carnitine abnormalities are associated with metabolic diseases such as isoleucine and leucine metabolism disorders, isovaleric acidemia and type 2 diabetes36. It has also been suggested that carnitine can stimulate neuroprotective factors37. In the past study, isovalerylcarnitine has been proved to be able to activate the calpain system, producing an early and marked increase in apoptosis and cell killing38. MM cells were found to be dependent on glucose and glutamine metabolism in the first metabolic analysis of MM cells39. Higher levels of isoleucine and lower levels of glutamine and some lipids have been observed in myeloma patients at diagnosis, but not after remission40. Bajpai et al.41 were able to show that targeting the glutamine metabolism sensitizes MM cells to the bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Studies of cellular metabolism have identified LDHA and HIF1Ī± as novel targets for drug resistance in MM under hypoxic conditions in the bone marrow. Inhibition of LDHA and HIF1A can restore sensitivity to therapeutic drugs such as bortezomib. This suggests a correlation between branched-chain amino acid metabolism and the development of multiple myeloma, which is confirmed by metabolic pathway analysis.
This study is innovative in many ways: firstly, it combines metabolomics and genomics to investigate the causal relationship between blood metabolites as exposure factors and multiple myeloma using a Mendelian randomization approach, which has important clinical research value; secondly, this study uses multiple MR models and sets strict quality control conditions to make the results reliable and stable; finally, the large number of exposure factors involved in this study were metabolites in the blood, thus the analytical workload was huge and posed analytical challenges. There are also some limitations to this study. One limitation of our study is that the GWAS data we used were all from European populations, so generalization to other populations may be limited; secondly, although we identified a number of metabolites that were causally associated with multiple myeloma in our study, some of these were unknown metabolites and could not be studied for further analysis. Additionally, while MR analysis provides valuable insights into etiology, we must consider that blood metabolites can be influenced by various factors such as diet, host genetics, and the gut microbiome42. We can just conclude that blood metabolites are associated with multiple myeloma, but causation is not necessarily direct, thus it is important to note that our findings should be validated through rigorous RCTs and basic research before application in the clinic.
In summary, this study used a Mendelian randomization approach to explore the possible causal link between blood metabolites and multiple myeloma. Although no direct causal relationship was found, a number of potential risk predictors for multiple myeloma were identified, which has the potential to provide new insights into the influence of genetic-exposure interactions in the disease process of multiple myeloma. Furthermore, the analysis of both potential risk factors and associated metabolic pathways suggests that the metabolism of branched-chain amino acids may provide a new reference for the early screening and treatment of multiple myeloma.
Data availability
The data and material that support the findings of this study are available in the IEU OpenGWAS, https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/datasets/.
References
Rajkumar, S. V. Multiple myeloma: Every year a new standard?. Hematol. Oncol. 37(Suppl 1), 62ā65. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2586 (2019).
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 568ā578. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.02815 (2023).
Durie, B. G. M. et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389, 519ā527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31594-x (2017).
Avet-Loiseau, H. Ultra high-risk myeloma. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program 489ā493, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.489 (2010).
Zhaoyun, L. & Rong, F. Predictive role of immune profiling for survival of multiple myeloma patients. Front. Immunol. 12, 663748. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.663748 (2021).
Tremblay, B. L., GuĆ©nard, F., Lamarche, B., PĆ©russe, L. & Vohl, M. C. Familial resemblances in human plasma metabolites are attributable to both genetic and common environmental effects. Nutr. Res. 61, 22ā30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2018.10.003 (2019).
Gieger, C. et al. Genetics meets metabolomics: A genome-wide association study of metabolite profiles in human serum. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000282 (2008).
Illig, T. et al. A genome-wide perspective of genetic variation in human metabolism. Nat. Genet. 42, 137ā141. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.507 (2010).
Tomas, L. et al. Altered metabolism distinguishes high-risk from stable carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Eur. Heart J. 39, 2301ā2310. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy124 (2018).
Griffin, J. L., Atherton, H., Shockcor, J. & Atzori, L. Metabolomics as a tool for cardiac research. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 8, 630ā643. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2011.138 (2011).
Floegel, A. et al. Identification of serum metabolites associated with risk of type 2 diabetes using a targeted metabolomic approach. Diabetes 62, 639ā648. https://doi.org/10.2337/db12-0495 (2013).
Jacobs, J. P. et al. Microbial and metabolite signatures of stress reactivity in ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission predict clinical flare risk. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad185 (2023).
Shahbazi Khamas, S., Alizadeh Bahmani, A. H., Vijverberg, S. J. H., Brinkman, P. & Maitland-van der Zee, A. H. Exhaled volatile organic compounds associated with risk factors for obstructive pulmonary diseases: A systematic review. ERJ Open Res. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00143-2023 (2023).
Li, C. et al. Brief report: Acetaminophen reduces neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in patients with NSCLC by promoting neutrophil extracellular trap formation: Analysis from a phase 2 clinical trial. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 4, 100556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100556 (2023).
Davies, N. M., Holmes, M. V. & Davey Smith, G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: A guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362, k601. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k601 (2018).
Adamski, J. Genome-wide association studies with metabolomics. Genome Med. 4, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm333 (2012).
Shin, S. Y. et al. An atlas of genetic influences on human blood metabolites. Nat. Genet. 46, 543ā550. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2982 (2014).
Burgess, S. & Thompson, S. G. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 40, 755ā764. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr036 (2011).
Hemani, G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408 (2018).
Burgess, S., Butterworth, A. & Thompson, S. G. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet. Epidemiol. 37, 658ā665. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21758 (2013).
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C. & Burgess, S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 40, 304ā314. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965 (2016).
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G. & Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44, 512ā525. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv080 (2015).
Hartwig, F. P., Davey Smith, G. & Bowden, J. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 1985ā1998. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx102 (2017).
Noble, W. S. How does multiple testing correction work?. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1135ā1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1209-1135 (2009).
Brion, M.-J.A., Shakhbazov, K. & Visscher, P. M. Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 1497ā1501. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt179 (2012).
Hemani, G., Bowden, J. & Davey Smith, G. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, R195āR208. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy163 (2018).
Pang, Z. et al. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: Narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W388-w396. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab382 (2021).
Li Volti, G. et al. The heme oxygenase system in hematological malignancies. Antioxid. Redox Signal 27, 363ā377. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2016.6735 (2017).
Raninga, P. V., Di Trapani, G., Vuckovic, S. & Tonissen, K. F. Cross-talk between two antioxidants, thioredoxin reductase and heme oxygenase-1, and therapeutic implications for multiple myeloma. Redox Biol. 8, 175ā185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2016.01.007 (2016).
Menni, C. et al. Biomarkers for type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose using a nontargeted metabolomics approach. Diabetes 62, 4270ā4276. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0570 (2013).
Schadewaldt, P., Wendel, U. & Hammen, H. W. Determination of R- and S-3-methyl-2-oxopentanoate enantiomers in human plasma: Suitable method for label enrichment analysis. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl. 682, 209ā218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(96)00091-6 (1996).
Shi, R. et al. High expression of VARS promotes the growth of multiple myeloma cells by causing imbalance in valine metabolism. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 48, 795ā808. https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220602 (2023).
Yu, Z., Qiu, B., Zhou, H., Li, L. & Niu, T. Characterization and application of a lactate and branched chain amino acid metabolism related gene signature in a prognosis risk model for multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell Int. 23, 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03007-4 (2023).
Adeva-Andany, M. M., LĆ³pez-Maside, L., Donapetry-GarcĆa, C., FernĆ”ndez-FernĆ”ndez, C. & Sixto-Leal, C. Enzymes involved in branched-chain amino acid metabolism in humans. Amino Acids 49, 1005ā1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2412-7 (2017).
Vieira Neto, E. et al. Analysis of acylcarnitine profiles in umbilical cord blood and during the early neonatal period by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 45, 546ā556. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500056 (2012).
Yahyaoui, R., Rueda, I., Dayaldasani, A. & Boemer, F. C5-carnitine false positive results in newborn screening: What is the cause?. Med. Clin. (Barc) 144, 181ā182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2014.03.011 (2015).
Jones, L. L., McDonald, D. A. & Borum, P. R. Acylcarnitines: Role in brain. Prog. Lipid Res. 49, 61ā75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2009.08.004 (2010).
Ferrara, F., Bertelli, A. & Falchi, M. Evaluation of carnitine, acetylcarnitine and isovalerylcarnitine on immune function and apoptosis. Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. 31, 109ā114 (2005).
Bajpai, R. et al. Targeting glutamine metabolism in multiple myeloma enhances BIM binding to BCL-2 eliciting synthetic lethality to venetoclax. Oncogene 35, 3955ā3964. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.464 (2016).
Puchades-Carrasco, L. et al. Multiple myeloma patients have a specific serum metabolomic profile that changes after achieving complete remission. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 4770ā4779. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-12-2917 (2013).
Maiso, P. et al. Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 75, 2071ā2082. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-14-3400 (2015).
Chen, L. et al. Influence of the microbiome, diet and genetics on inter-individual variation in the human plasma metabolome. Nat. Med. 28, 2333ā2343. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02014-8 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.L. conceived of the presented idea, developed the theory and performed the computations. R.L. and W.M. verified the analytical methods. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, J., Wu, M. Causal effects of genetically determined blood metabolites on multiple myeloma: a Mendelian randomization study. Sci Rep 13, 18818 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45801-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45801-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.