Abstract
The multi-system involvement and high heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pose great challenges to its diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of the current study is to identify genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. High throughput sequencing was performed on the PBMCs from SLE patients. We conducted differential gene analysis, gene ontology (GO) analysis, kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) verification. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis, alternative splicing analysis, and disease correlation analysis were conducted on some key pathogenic genes as well. Furthermore, si-CDC6 was used for transfection and cell proliferation was monitored using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. We identified 2495 differential genes (1494 upregulated and 1001 downregulated) in SLE patients compared with healthy controls. The significantly upregulated genes were enriched in the biological process-related GO terms of the cell cycle, response to stress, and chromosome organization. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed 7 significantly upregulated pathways including SLE, alcoholism, viral carcinogenesis, cell cycle, proteasome, malaria, and transcriptional misregulation in cancer. We successfully verified some differential genes on the SLE pathway and the cell cycle pathway. CDC6, a key gene in the cell cycle pathway, had remarkably higher MXE alternative splicing events in SLE patients than that in controls, which may explain its significant upregulation in SLE patients. We found that CDC6 participates in the pathogenesis of many proliferation-related diseases and its levels are positively correlated with the severity of SLE. Knockdown of CDC6 suppressed the proliferation of Hela cells and PBMCs from SLE patients in vitro. We identified SLE-related genes and their alternative splicing events. The cell cycle pathway and the cell cycle-related biological processes are over-activated in SLE patients. We revealed a higher incidence of MXE events of CDC6, which may lead to its high expression in SLE patients. Upregulated cell cycle signaling and CDC6 may be related to the hyperproliferation and pathogenesis of SLE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease involving multiple organs and systems1. Extensive organ damage may happen in the early stage of SLE, which can seriously affect a patient’s quality of life2,3,4,5. The main features of SLE include the production of autoantibodies and the deposition of immune complexes6. Immune complexes may be deposited in the skin, joints, renal tubule, glomeruli, and other parts of the patients7. Comprehensive autoAb screening revealed that the antigens targeted by the autoAbs were most significantly enriched in cell death, cell cycle, and DNA repair pathways8. Therefore, SLE may also be a cell proliferation disease9. We speculate that the hyperactivation of cell cycle pathway may lead to B cell proliferation and massive production of autoantibodies. The in-depth study of genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of SLE will lay a foundation for the effective diagnosis and treatment of the disease.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients have been widely used to study the pathogenesis of systemic immune diseases such as SLE and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)10,11,12,13. High throughput transcriptome sequencing technology with perfect quantitative function was applied to study gene expression in SLE14,15,16. Therefore, we used this method to study the PBMCs from SLE patients. The differential genes were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analysis. We further studied the protein–protein interaction (PPI), alternative splicing, etc. to explore the key pathogenic genes and pathways of SLE.
Methods
Sample collection and clinical information
We recruited 78 SLE patients and 50 matched healthy controls for the current study. All of the patients met at least 4 of the 11 diagnostic criteria for SLE that were revised by the american college of rheumatology (ACR)17. Clinical data of newly diagnosed SLE patients from August 2018 to November 2022 were collected at the First Hospital of Jilin University (Additional File 1–2: Table S1, S2). 20 SLE patients and 10 healthy controls were randomly selected for mRNA sequencing. Samples from 58 SLE patients and 40 healthy controls were used for validation and function assay. All of the patients and healthy controls were Asian, and they had no alcoholism, viral carcinogenesis, proteasome, malaria, cancer, and other diseases at the time of sample collection. PBMCs were isolated from whole blood by density gradient centrifugation (Lymphopre, Axis-Shield, Scotland)18. TRIzol reagent (1 ml; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added to 5 × 106 PBMCs and stored at − 80 °C. The immunoturbidimetric kits (Zhongyuan Biotech Holdings, China) were used to detect the serum levels of IgM, IgG, and IgA for the SLE patients.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval for the current study was obtained from the Institutional Medical Ethics Review Board of the First Hospital of Jilin University (reference number: 2017–087). Informed consent for enrolment was obtained from all selected participants or their guardians. All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Sequencing
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA degradation and contamination were monitored on 1% agarose gels. We tested RNA purity using NanoPhotometer® (IMPLEN, CA, USA) and measured RNA concentration using Qubit® RNA Assay Kit on a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, CA, USA). RNA integrity was assessed using RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit on a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA)19,20.
We used 3 μg RNA per sample as input material for sample preparation. Firstly, ribosomal RNA was removed by Epicentre Ribo-zero™ rRNA Removal Kit (Epicentre, USA) and rRNA-free residues were cleaned up by ethanol precipitation. Subsequently, sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using TruSeq PE Cluster Kit v3-cBot-HS (Illumia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We assessed the quality of sequencing library on Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. Finally, sequencing was performed with Illumina HiSeq X Ten (paired-end 150-bp reads).
Sequencing data analysis
We firstly processed raw data (raw reads) of fastq format through in-house perl scripts. In this step, we obtained clean data(clean reads) by removing reads containing adapter, reads containing ploy-N and low quality reads from raw data. At the same time, we calculated Q20, Q30 and GC content of the clean data. All the downstream analyses were based on the clean data with high quality.
Ballgown suite was used for interactive exploration of the transcriptome assembly, visualization of transcript structures and feature-specific abundances for each locus, and post-hoc annotation of assembled features to annotated features21. Reference genome and gene model annotation files were downloaded from the Ensembl database (Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.94). We built the index of the reference genome using HISAT2 v2.0.4 and aligned paired-end clean reads to the reference genome using HISAT2 v2.0.422. HISAT2 was run with ‘–rna-strandness RF’, other parameters were set as default. We assembled the mapped reads of each sample by StringTie (v1.3.3)23 in a reference-based approach. The software used for difference analysis is edgeR (3.0.8)24.Transcripts with a corrected-P < 0.05 were assigned as differentially expressed.
GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was implemented by the GOseq R package, in which gene length bias was corrected25. GO terms with corrected-P < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched. KEGG is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and utilities of the biological system26, from molecular-level information, especially large-scale molecular datasets generated by genome sequencing and other high-throughput experimental technologies (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). We used KOBAS software to test the statistical enrichment of differential expression genes in KEGG pathways19,20,27.
We used rMATS (v3.2.1) to detect the differential alternative splicing events in replicate RNA-Seq data28. Alternative splicing events were classified to five basic types by software Asprofile v1.0. The expression values for all transcripts located in the same gene locus were added together to represent the expression level of that particular gene. Then, using the gene expression matrix prepared, we used an online transcriptome-based immune cell number prediction tool ABIS (https://giannimonaco.shinyapps.io/ABIS/) to estimate the proportion of different immune cell types.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
We treated cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). RNA was extracted using TransZol Up Plus RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). We used Trans Script All-in-One First-strand cDNA Synthesis Supermix for qPCR Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) in RNA reverse transcription. qRT-PCR was then performed as previously described18,29.
Cell transfection
Small interference RNA against CDC6 (si-CDC6) and its negative control (NC) were assembled by IBSBIO (Shanghai, China). Hela cells were seeded in 12-well plate (5 × 105 cells/well/ml for qRT-PCR assay) or 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well/100μL for proliferation assay) in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (Corning, NY, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (BIOIND, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel). PBMCs were plated in 12-well plate (5 × 105 cells/well/ml for qRT-PCR assay) or 96-well plates (5 × 103 cells/well/100μL for proliferation assay) in RPMI1640 (Corning, NY, USA) with 10% patients’ serum. After plating and overnight culture, all oligonucleotides were transfected using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA), and non-transfected cells were used as the control. 48 h later, cells were used for qRT-PCR or proliferation assay.
Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
To detect cell proliferation, 48 h after transfection in 96-well plates, 10 μL CCK-8 reagent (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) was added into each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Finally, the absorbance at 450 nm was detected with the Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader (Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA).
Statistical methods
GraphPad Prism 8.0 was used for statistical analysis and picture drawing (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA). In order to compare different matrices, we used the expression level of each gene to generate an unsupervised heat map. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare paired samples, and Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare unpaired samples. Nonparametric Spearman rank correlation test was applied to determine the correlations. A P value below 0.05 was considered significant.
Protein–protein interaction (PPI) patterns were analyzed using STRING database (http://string-db.org/; version 10.5) with a confidence score > 0.9. A gene-related disease enrichment map was generated on Open Targets Platform30 (https://www.targetvalidation.org, search keyword: CDC6) on September 6, 2021. The expressional distribution data of CDC6 in the PBMCs of healthy people were downloaded from the Single Cell Portal website(https://singlecell.broadinstitute.org/single_cell/study/SCP345/ica-blood-mononuclear-cells-2-donors-2-sites, search keyword: CDC6) on September 6, 2021.
Results
Identification and classification of differentially expressed genes between the SLE group and control group
Clinical information of the sequencing subjects was shown in Additional File 1: Table S1. There were no significant differences in gender or age between the two groups. We carried out principal component analysis (PCA) to assess the clustering nature of these samples. Data showed good repeatability and correlations (Fig. 1a). We identified 2495 differentially expressed genes (1494 upregulated genes and 1001 downregulated genes) between the SLE group and the control group (Fig. 1b). The clustering analysis of these genes was shown in Fig. 1c. The top 20 upregulated genes were TTK, ETV7, NCAPG, TOP2A, ASPM, IFI44, DLGAP5, HIST1H3J, HIST1H3G, HESX1, PBK, USP18, IFI44L, HIST1H3C, HIST1H2AH, HIST2H4A, HIST1H3B, IFI27, HIST1H2BH and HIST1H1B (Additional File 3: Table S3). The top 20 downregulated genes were SPON2, TMEM8B, AUTS2, FYN, ADA2, TBC1D22A, AUTS2, ARHGAP45, MSANTD2, SCRN1, HSP90AB1, AGAP1, CAST, COL6A2, ACIN1, LARS2, MT-ND1, SARS2, ZC3HAV1 and ZMYM3 (Additional File 4: Table S4).
To explore the biological functions of these upregulated genes, we performed GO analysis (Fig. 2a). The top 30 upregulated GO terms were classified into biological process (BP) class, cellular component (CC) class, and molecular function (MF) class. Detailed information on each GO term was listed in Additional File 5: Table S5. The 20 GO terms of CC class are mainly enriched in DNA, chromosome, and nuclear-related terms. Furthermore, the terms of BP class were depicted as directed acyclic graphs in Fig. 2b to show their relationships. The significantly upregulated genes were highly enriched into 3 groups of GO terms including cell cycle, chromosome organization, and response to stress. The top 30 downregulated GO terms were classified into BP class, CC class, and MF class. Detailed information on each GO term was listed in Additional File 6: Table S6.
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis
The top 20 upregulated KEGG pathways were shown in Fig. 3a. Detailed information on seven significantly upregulated KEGG pathways can be found in Fig. 3b. The SLE pathway and cell cycle pathway were significantly upregulated (Fig. 3, corrected-P < 0.05). Top 20 downregulated KEGG pathways for SLE patients can be found in Additional File 7: Table S7.
The SLE pathway is a pathway with an ID number of map 05322 (https://www.kegg.jp/entry/map05322, Additional File 8: Figure S1). Sixty-four upregulated genes (Additional File 9: Table S8) were identified in the SLE pathway (Fig. 4a). These genes are involved in autoantigens formation, lymphocyte activation, immune complex formation and deposition, and neutrophils/macrophages migration. Histone translation regulates DNA accessibility, which is related to the development of diseases.
Complement and coagulation cascades pathway are upregulated in SLE. C1QA, C1QB, C1QC, and C2 were significantly upregulated. Figure 4b showed the cluster analysis on the significantly upregulated genes of C1QB, C1QC, C2, HIST1A2BB, HIST1H3G, HIST1H4L, HLA-DPA1, IL10, FCGR1A, FCGR1B, CTSG, and ELANE. Validation experiments confirmed that these genes were upregulated in the PBMCs of SLE patients (Fig. 4c).
Genes (RBX1, E2F3, CHEK1, BUB1, etc., Additional File 8: Table S8 ) on the cell cycle pathway were upregulated in SLE patients. Among them, the members of the E2F family (E2F1, E2F2), CDC family (CDC6, CDC45), MCM family (MCM2, MCM4), and ORC family (ORC1, ORC6) participate in DNA biosynthesis (Fig. 5a, Additional File 10: Figure S2). Figure 5b showed the cluster analysis on them. qRT-PCR validated that E2F1, E2F2, CDC6, CDC45, MCM2, MCM4, ORC1, and ORC6 were significantly upregulated in SLE patients (Fig. 5c). We mapped the interactions and evidence among these proteins as a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network (Fig. 5d).
Alternative splicing events between the SLE group and control group
More than 90 percent of human genes have variable splicing, which plays an important role in the transmission of life information31. Compared with the control group, MATS analysis revealed 349 differential alternative splicing events in the SLE group (Fig. 6a) and 219 of them (62.75%) belonged to mutual exclusive exon (MXE). Among these genes with MXE, CDC6 is the only gene significantly upregulated in the cell cycle pathway. Therefore, we chose CDC6 for further analysis.
CDC6 is located on 17q21.2 (40,287,878–40,304,657). It is involved in the initiation of DNA replication and checkpoint controls that ensure DNA replication is completed before mitosis is initiated. The FPKM levels of the six transcripts for CDC6 were listed in Additional File 11: Table S9. We chose ENST00000209728 for further study, which was detectable in all of the samples and was significantly upregulated in SLE patients. The qRT-PCR verification results of ENST00000209728 were shown in Fig. 5c. We identified MXE (chr17: 40,295,355–40,302,236) of CDC6 in the PBMCs (Fig. 6b). Exon 2 is abundant in the SLE group and is absent in the control group. Figure 6c showed the Sashimi Plot of the MXE events in the CDC6 of CTRL1 and SLE19 samples. In the Junction Track of IGV, radians between histograms display splice junctions detected in reads. The junctions reads of SLE19 were significantly higher than that of CTRL1 on exon 2. Therefore, CDC6 has more MXE may explain the significant upregulation of CDC6 in SLE patients.
We further analyzed the protein–protein interaction network associated with CDC6 (Fig. 7a). Results showed that CDC6 was closely related to MCM2, MCM4, MCM6, or CCNA2. According to published studies, CDC6 is involved in 107 diseases as shown in the disease enrichment map (Fig. 7b). Cell proliferation disorders (Association score: 0.82, 64 diseases) are the most common causes of CDC6-related diseases. CDC6 is also involved in urinary system disease (Association score: 0.79, 23 diseases) and respiratory or thoracic disease (Association score: 0.79, 21 diseases). Ear-patella-short stature syndrome (Association score: 1.00) is a very rare genetic disorder that is also strongly associated with CDC6. We further found that CDC6-related GO terms were significantly upregulated in the SLE group (Fig. 7c), and these GO terms are related to cell cycle and cellular components.
We analyzed the relationship between CDC6 level and patient clinical data. Results showed that FPKMs of CDC6 (ENST00006209728) were positively correlated with SLEDAI levels in SLE patients (Fig. 8a), which indicates that CDC6 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of SLE. In addition, the analysis of expanded samples of PBMCs from SLE patients showed that the expression of CDC6 was positively correlated with the level of IgM antibody in the blood of SLE patients (Fig. 8b). However, no obvious correlations were found between CDC6 levels and IgG or IgA levels in SLE patients (Fig. 8c, d). Therefore, we speculate that CDC6 may affect the production of IgM antibodies.
As shown in Additional File 12: Figure S3, the results from the single-cell sequencing database suggested that CDC6 was mainly expressed in memory B cells, naive B cells, T cells, and NK cells. We further analyzed our sequencing data on cell proportions in PBMCs of SLE patients or healthy controls (Additional File 13: Figure S4). The proportion of naive B cells, plasma cells, and monocytes was significantly upregulated, whereas the proportion of T cells, NK cells, and DC cells was significantly downregulated, in patients with SLE compared with controls. These results indicate that naive B cells and plasma cells are highly proliferative cells in PBMCs of SLE patients. In order to explore the function of CDC6 in human cells and in SLE, we transfected Hela cells or SLE patients' PBMCs with si-CDC6 mRNA, which significantly inhibited the expression of CDC6 in these cells (Fig. 8e) After CDC6 knockdown, the proliferation of Hela cells and PBMCs were prominently impaired compared with si-NC or Control (Fig. 8f). These data suggested that CDC6 knockdown inhibited human cell proliferation in SLE in vitro.
Discussion
The pathogenesis of SLE is incompletely understood. We investigated the key pathways and factors involved in the pathogenesis of SLE by high-throughput sequencing to provide a molecular basis for effective treatment of SLE.
We identified 1494 upregulated and 1001 downregulated genes in SLE patients compared to controls. The most significantly upregulated pathway is the SLE pathway, which is easy to understand and similar to some reports32. We found that in patients with SLE: (1) Histone (H2B, H3, H4) and complements (C1q, C2) are significantly upregulated to participate in antigen presentation; (2) HLA-DPA1 and IL-10 are significantly upregulated to participate in cell activation; (3) C1q, C2, CSTG, ELANE, and FcγR are significantly upregulated and involved in tissue injury. Mo et al. also reported significantly upregulated SLE pathway in SLE patients33. We found that FcγR is significantly upregulated in SLE patients. Similarly, Zhang et al. suggested that the most differentially expressed genes were enriched on the FcγR-mediated phagocytosis pathway34. On the other hand, Ye et al. studied the targeted mRNA of long-chain non-coding RNA in SLE patients, but did not mention the SLE pathway in their enrichment analysis16.
Genes significantly upregulated in SLE patients were enriched on the GO terms related to cell cycle, stress response, and chromosome organization. The 235 upregulated genes enriched in the cell cycle term, belonged to the CDC family, E2F family, MCM family, and ORC family. Similarly, Ye et al. screened 740 mRNAs targeted by 23 lincRNAs in SLE patients. These genes were mainly involved in DNA binding and transcription, cell cycle, etc.16, which was mutually confirmed by our results. In addition, we found that 37 differently expressed genes affecting DNA replication were enriched in the G1-S phase of the cell cycle pathway. We validated some upregulated genes (E2F1, E2F2, ORC1, ORC6, MCM2, MCM4, CDC6, CDC45) and found close protein interactions between these factors. In particular, the interaction between CDC6 and MCM2,4,6 was highly reliable. Differently, Zhang et al. demonstrated disregulated GO terms of ribonucleotide, protein serine/threonine kinase activity function, and regulation of B cell differentiation in SLE patients34. Zhang et al. used whole blood (3 samples in each group) whereas we used PBMCs (10 or 20 samples in each group). These sampling differences may partly explain our different results.
Regulation of the cell cycle is a basic biological process that ensures the function and health of the entire organism35. Hu et al. reported the prognostic and diagnostic value of the increased expression of CDC6, CDC45, and ORC6 in the cell cycle pathway in colorectal cancer36. The occurrence of ear-patella-short syndrome is related to genetic mutations in CDC6, ORC1, ORC4, ORC6, and CDT137,38,39. SLE patients have a high proportion of low-density neutrophils (LDNs)40. The upregulation of the cell cycle pathway in CD10- LDNs leads to the immaturity of these cells41. Gao et al. found that the cell cycle pathway may be involved in the pathogenesis of nephritis in SLE patients42. Nafise Tabasi et al. believe that Vitamin D inhibits cell cycle progression, which regulates and stabiliz the immune system of SLE patients43.
CDC6 is involved in the formation of pre-replication complexes (pre-RC), which play a key role in the regulation of DNA replication and cell proliferation44,45,46. CDC6 is not only required for G1 origin licensing, but is also crucial for proper S-phase DNA replication that is essential for DNA segregation during mitosis47 CDC6 is a specific biomarker of proliferating cells48,49,50, and a candidate prognostic marker associated with cell apoptosis and cell cycle51. CDC6 overexpression interferes with the expression of INK4/ARF tumor suppressor genes through a mechanism involving the epigenetic modification of chromatin at the INK4/ARF locus52. Therefore, CDC6 overexpression is a feature of tumors and is associated with early events of malignancies53,54,55,56. We found highly expressed CDC6 in the peripheral blood of SLE, which may increase DNA replication and cell proliferation as a key factor in the pathogenesis of SLE. People found that the transcription factor binding sites of E2F1 were significantly over-represented in SLE loci57, while drugs targeting E2F1 lead to innovative therapies for SLE58. We suppose CDC6 may become an effective and innovative target for the treatment of SLE as well.
Research on alternative splicing attracted more and more attention59,60,61. People reported increased alternative splicing events for IRF5 which was associated with the incidence and severity of lupus62. Moulton et al. reported that the selective splicing of CD3ζ partly downregulated the levels of CD3ζ in patients with SLE, which in turn downregulated T cell function63,64,65. We revealed that the MXE levels of CDC6 in the SLE group were significantly higher than that of the control group, which may contribute to the high expression of CDC6 in SLE patients.
Furthermore, we found that the level of CDC6 was significantly correlated with the level of SLEDAI or IgM, and the knockdown of CDC6 in PBMCs from SLE patients inhibited the proliferation of these cells. Therefore, CDC6 plays an important role in the proliferation of human cells and the pathogenesis of SLE. The cell cycle pathway has been used as the therapeutic target of cancer66,67,68,69,70,71,72. CDC6 expression in glioma was positively correlated with Th2 cells, Macrophages and Eosinophils, and negatively correlated with plasmacytoid dendritic cells, CD8 T cells and NK CD56bright cells, suggesting its role in regulating tumor immunity. MAPK pathway, P53 pathway, and NF-κB pathway in cancer were differentially enriched with high CDC6 expression. Silencing CDC6 could significantly inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion, and promoted apoptosis of U87 cells and U251 cells73. Cyclophosphamide inhibits proliferation of mesangial cells by downregulating cell cycle regulator including cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases and therefore arresting them at G1 phase74. People identified Cdkn2c, a gene that controls cell cycle progression, as a key regulator of B-1a cell numbers. Cdkn2c deficiency associated with SLE pathogenesis, including the production of autoantibodies and the skewing of CD4( +) T cells toward inflammatory effector functions75. APRIL is reported to modify genes specifically related to cell cycle modulation, including CDC676. We speculate that CDC6 may be an effective target for SLE. Inhibition of CDC6 in hyperproliferative B may become an effective treatment regimen for SLE.
The current study has several limitations. Firstly, we performed a high-throughput sequencing analysis on PBMCs but did not further determine the cell type. The situation for CDC6 in B cells from SLE patients is unclear. However, it is found that the G1321A polymorphism of CDC6 was associated with decreased risk for B-cell-non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which suggested the role of CDC6 in B cells77. Normally, CDC6 was mostly expressed in memory B cells, naive B cells, T cells, and NK cells of PBMCs. Our data suggested the proportions of naive B cells, plasma cells, and monocytes in PBMCs were significantly upregulated in SLE patients compared to controls. SLE is considered an autoimmune disease of B cell hyperactivity7. Thus, we hypothesized that the enhancement of CDC6 expression and the activation of the cell cycle pathway in SLE patients are likely to occur at least in B cells. Secondly, the relationship between CDC6 and LN is not clear. We didn’t find correlation between CDC6 expression levels in PBMCs and urinary protein levels. Hence, no evidence can be provided so far to support the association of CDC6 with lupus nephritis.
Conclusions
We identified 2495 differently expressed genes for SLE. The SLE pathway, cell cycle pathway, and key factor CDC6 were significantly upregulated. We revealed upregulated MXE alternative splicing events in the CDC6 of SLE patients, which may lead to its upregulation in these patients. The expression of CDC6 was positively correlated with SLEDAI level or IgM level in SLE patients. Knockdown of CDC6 suppressed the proliferation of SLE patients’ PBMCs in vitro, hinting that CDC6 participated in the pathological proliferation of SLE. These findings may provide new ideas for the effective treatment of SLE.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO repository (accession number: GSE211700, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE211700, token number: efalyswybxgthmz).
Abbreviations
- ACR:
-
american college of rheumatology
- BP:
-
biological process
- CC:
-
cellular component
- CCK-8:
-
cell counting kit-8
- CTRL:
-
control
- GO:
-
gene ontology
- GWAS:
-
genome-wide association studies
- KEGG:
-
kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
- LDNs:
-
low-density neutrophils
- MF:
-
molecular function
- MXE:
-
mutual exclusive exon
- PBMCs:
-
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- pre-RC:
-
pre-replication complexes
- PCA:
-
principal component analysis
- PPI:
-
protein–protein interaction
- qRT-PCR:
-
quantitative real-time PCR
- RA:
-
rheumatoid arthritis
- RYBP:
-
RING1 and YY1-Binding protein
- si-RNA:
-
small interference RNA
- SLE:
-
systematic lupus erythematosus
References
Harley, J. B., Kelly, J. A. & Kaufman, K. M. Unraveling the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. Spring. Semin Immunopathol. 28(2), 119–130 (2006).
Chinese Rheumatology Association, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic Immunologic Diseases, Chinese Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment and Research Group. 2020 Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 59(3), 172–85 (2020).
Carter, E. E., Barr, S. G. & Clarke, A. E. The global burden of SLE: Prevalence, health disparities and socioeconomic impact. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12(10), 605–620 (2016).
Kamitaki, N. et al. Complement genes contribute sex-biased vulnerability in diverse disorders. Nature 582(7813), 577–581 (2020).
Lawrence, J. S., Martins, C. L. & Drake, G. L. A family survey of lupus erythematosus. 1. Heritability. J. Rheumatol. 14(5), 913–21 (1987).
Olsen, N. J. & Karp, D. R. Autoantibodies and SLE: The threshold for disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 10(3), 181–186 (2014).
Lipsky, P. E. Systemic lupus erythematosus: An autoimmune disease of B cell hyperactivity. Nat. Immunol. 2(9), 764–766 (2001).
Luo, H. et al. Novel autoantibodies related to cell death and DNA repair pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 17(3), 248–259 (2019).
Nie, Y., Zhao, L. & Zhang, X. B cell aberrance in lupus: The ringleader and the solution. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 62, 301–323 (2021).
Winkler, A. et al. The interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 inhibitor PF-06650833 blocks inflammation in preclinical models of rheumatic disease and in humans enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 73, 2206–22184 (2021).
Song, W. et al. Integrated analysis of competing endogenous RNA networks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Transl. Med. 19(1), 362 (2021).
You, Y. et al. Integrated transcriptome profiling revealed that elevated long non-coding RNA-AC00727.8 2 expression repressed CCR7 transcription in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 12, 615859 (2021).
Zhu, T. et al. The decreased expression of IKBKE in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Rheumatol. 39(9), 2611–2617 (2020).
Panousis, N. I. et al. Combined genetic and transcriptome analysis of patients with SLE: Distinct, targetable signatures for susceptibility and severity. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 78(8), 1079–1089 (2019).
Li, Y. M. et al. mRNA expression of chemokine receptors on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and correlation with clinical features in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Chin. Med. Sci. J. 25(3), 162–168 (2010).
Ye, H. et al. Full high-throughput sequencing analysis of differences in expression profiles of long noncoding RNAs and their mechanisms of action in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 21(1), 70 (2019).
Hochberg, M. C. Updating the American college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 40(9), 1725 (1997).
Liu, T. et al. Microarray-based analysis of renal complement components reveals a therapeutic target for lupus nephritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 23(1), 223 (2021).
Gao, M. et al. Transcriptome analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia reveals natural killer and T cell-proliferation responses. Front. Immunol. 9, 1403 (2018).
Wang, K. et al. Transcriptome analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with severe mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia reveals novel gene expression and immunodeficiency. Hum. Genomics. 11(1), 4 (2017).
Frazee, A. C., Sabunciyan, S., Hansen, K. D., Irizarry, R. A. & Leek, J. T. Differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data at single-base resolution. Biostatistics 15(3), 413–426 (2014).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 9(4), 357–359 (2012).
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33(3), 290–295 (2015).
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1), 139–140 (2010).
Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K. & Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 11(2), R14 (2010).
Kanehisa, M. et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D480–D484 (2008).
Mao, X., Cai, T., Olyarchuk, J. G. & Wei, L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics 21(19), 3787–3793 (2005).
Shen, S. et al. rMATS: Robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111(51), E5593–E5601 (2014).
Yuan, Y. et al. Excessive activation of the TLR9/TGF-beta1/PDGF-B pathway in the peripheral blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 19(1), 70 (2017).
Ochoa, D. et al. Open Targets Platform: Supporting systematic drug-target identification and prioritisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49(D1), D1302–D1310 (2021).
Wang, E. T. et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456(7221), 470–476 (2008).
McGaraughty, S. et al. βTargeting Anti-TGF- therapy to fibrotic kidneys with a dual specificity antibody approach. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 28(12), 3616–3626 (2017).
Mo, X. et al. Mendelian randomization analysis revealed potential causal factors for systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunology 159(3), 279–288 (2020).
Zhang, Q. et al. Integrated analysis of lncRNA, miRNA and mRNA expression profiling in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch. Med. Sci. 15(4), 872–879 (2019).
Hsu, J. et al. E2F4 regulates transcriptional activation in mouse embryonic stem cells independently of the RB family. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 2939 (2019).
Hu, Y. et al. Potential Prognostic and diagnostic values of CDC6, CDC45, ORC6 and SNHG7 in colorectal cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 12, 11609–11621 (2019).
Bicknell, L. S. et al. Mutations in the pre-replication complex cause Meier–Gorlin syndrome. Nat. Genet. 43(4), 356–359 (2011).
Maas, K. et al. Cutting edge: Molecular portrait of human autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 169(1), 5–9 (2002).
Qing, X. & Putterman, C. Gene expression profiling in the study of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun. Rev. 3(7–8), 505–509 (2004).
Tay, S. H., Celhar, T. & Fairhurst, A. M. Low-density neutrophils in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 72(10), 1587–1595 (2020).
Mistry, P. et al. Transcriptomic, epigenetic, and functional analyses implicate neutrophil diversity in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116(50), 25222–25228 (2019).
Gao, Y. et al. Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil on mesangial cell proliferation based on the cell cycle. Int. J. Mol. Med. 46(4), 1582–1592 (2020).
Tabasi, N. et al. Influence of vitamin D on cell cycle, apoptosis, and some apoptosis related molecules in systemic lupus erythematosus. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 18(11), 1107–1111 (2015).
Pelizon, C., d’Adda di Fagagna, F., Farrace, L. & Laskey, R. A. Human replication protein Cdc6 is selectively cleaved by caspase 3 during apoptosis. EMBO Rep. 3(8), 780–784 (2002).
Pelizon, C. Down to the origin: Cdc6 protein and the competence to replicate. Trends Cell Biol. 13(3), 110–113 (2003).
Cook, J. G. et al. Analysis of Cdc6 function in the assembly of mammalian prereplication complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99(3), 1347–1352 (2002).
Lau, E., Zhu, C., Abraham, R. T. & Jiang, W. The functional role of Cdc6 in S-G2/M in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep. 7(4), 425–430 (2006).
Sun, S. et al. Berberine downregulates CDC6 and inhibits proliferation via targeting JAK-STAT3 signaling in keratinocytes. Cell Death Dis. 10(4), 274 (2019).
Feng, L. et al. Cdc6 knockdown inhibits human neuroblastoma cell proliferation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 311(1–2), 189–197 (2008).
Ke, Y. et al. RYBP inhibits esophageal squamous cell carcinoma proliferation through downregulating CDC6 and CDC45 in G1-S phase transition process. Life Sci. 250, 117578 (2020).
Jiang, W. et al. Downregulation of Cdc6 inhibits tumorigenesis of osteosarcoma in vivo and in vitro. Biomed. Pharmacother. 115, 108949 (2019).
Borlado, L. R. & Mendez, J. CDC6: From DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis. Carcinogenesis 29(2), 237–243 (2008).
Liontos, M. et al. Deregulated overexpression of hCdt1 and hCdc6 promotes malignant behavior. Cancer Res. 67(22), 10899–10909 (2007).
Karakaidos, P. et al. Overexpression of the replication licensing regulators hCdt1 and hCdc6 characterizes a subset of non-small-cell lung carcinomas: Synergistic effect with mutant p53 on tumor growth and chromosomal instability–evidence of E2F–1 transcriptional control over hCdt1. Am. J. Pathol. 165(4), 1351–1365 (2004).
Chen, S. et al. Cdc6 contributes to cisplatin-resistance by activation of ATR-Chk1 pathway in bladder cancer cells. Oncotarget 7(26), 40362–40376 (2016).
Murphy, N. et al. p16INK4A, CDC6, and MCM5: Predictive biomarkers in cervical preinvasive neoplasia and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. 58(5), 525–534 (2005).
Molineros, J. E. et al. Confirmation of five novel susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and integrated network analysis of 82 SLE susceptibility loci. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26(6), 1205–1216 (2017).
Fang, X. Y. & Ye, D. Q. E2F1: A potential therapeutic target for systematic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol. Int. 34(8), 1175–1176 (2014).
Papanikolaou, S., Bertsias, G. K. & Nikolaou, C. Extensive changes in transcription dynamics reflected on alternative splicing events in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Genes (Basel) 12(8), 1260 (2021).
AlFadhli, S. & Nizam, R. Differential expression of alternative splice variants of CTLA4 in Kuwaiti autoimmune disease patients. Gene 534(2), 307–312 (2014).
Odhams, C. A. et al. Mapping eQTLs with RNA-seq reveals novel susceptibility genes, non-coding RNAs and alternative-splicing events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26(5), 1003–1017 (2017).
Song, S. et al. Inhibition of IRF5 hyperactivation protects from lupus onset and severity. J. Clin. Invest. 130(12), 6700–6717 (2020).
Moulton, V. R., Gillooly, A. R., Perl, M. A., Markopoulou, A. & Tsokos, G. C. Serine arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) contributes to the transcriptional activation of CD3zeta in human T cells. PLoS ONE 10(7), e0131073 (2015).
Moulton, V. R., Gillooly, A. R. & Tsokos, G. C. Ubiquitination regulates expression of the serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) in normal and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 289(7), 4126–4134 (2014).
Moulton, V. R., Grammatikos, A. P., Fitzgerald, L. M. & Tsokos, G. C. Splicing factor SF2/ASF rescues IL-2 production in T cells from systemic lupus erythematosus patients by activating IL-2 transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110(5), 1845–1850 (2013).
Lee, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR screening identifies cell cycle and protein ubiquitination processes as druggable targets for erlotinib-resistant lung cancer. Mol. Oncol. 15(2), 487–502 (2021).
Yin, H. et al. Appropriate delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system through the nonlysosomal route: Application for therapeutic gene editing. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 7(14), 1903381 (2020).
Muller, D. et al. eIF4A inhibition circumvents uncontrolled DNA replication mediated by 4E-BP1 loss in pancreatic cancer. JCI Insight. 4(21), e121951 (2019).
Ma, Z. et al. EGR1-mediated linc01503 promotes cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis in gastric cancer. Cell Prolif. 54(1), e12922 (2021).
Zhang, L. et al. LncRNA CASC11 promoted gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro by regulating cell cycle pathway. Cell Cycle 17(15), 1886–1900 (2018).
Yousef, M. A. et al. Design and synthesis of novel isatin-based derivatives targeting cell cycle checkpoint pathways as potential anticancer agents. Bioorg. Chem. 105, 104366 (2020).
Lim, N. & Townsend, P. A. Cdc6 as a novel target in cancer: Oncogenic potential, senescence and subcellular localisation. Int. J. Cancer 147(6), 1528–1534 (2020).
Wang, F. et al. CDC6 is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in glioma. Mol. Cancer. 21(1), 153 (2022).
Ma, Y. et al. Cyclophosphamide attenuates fibrosis in lupus nephritis by regulating mesangial cell cycle progression. Dis. Markers. 2021, 3803601 (2021).
Xu, Z. & Morel, L. Contribution of B-1a cells to systemic lupus erythematosus in the NZM2410 mouse model. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1362(1), 215–223 (2015).
Notas, G. et al. APRIL binding to BCMA activates a JNK2-FOXO3-GADD45 pathway and induces a G2/M cell growth arrest in liver cells. J. Immunol. 189(10), 4748–4758 (2012).
Xiong, X. D. et al. Association analysis between the Cdc6 G1321A polymorphism and the risk for non-hodgkin lymphoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mutat. Res. 662(1–2), 10–15 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the patients who have participated in the study. The authors also thank Mr. Yingjie Li and his colleagues of Novogene Co.Ltd (Beijing) for their assistance in the data processing. The authors thank Dr. Aiping Wu from Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine for the helpful discussions.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, China [No. 20210204174YY, 20190201249JC]; the Starting Fund of the First Hospital of Jilin University, China [No. 04032690001].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.Y. did experiments, created figures, contributed to statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript; P.W. analyzed clinical information and sequencing data; T.L. and X.Z. collected clinical samples and performed qRT-PCR experiments; Y.X. is involved in statistical analysis; C.L. is involved in qRT-PCR experiments; X.W. designed the study, analyzed data, completed and revised the manuscript; all of the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, M., Wang, P., Liu, T. et al. High throughput sequencing revealed enhanced cell cycle signaling in SLE patients. Sci Rep 13, 159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27310-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27310-8
This article is cited by
-
Unraveling transcriptomic signatures and dysregulated pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus across disease states
Arthritis Research & Therapy (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.