Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia in general are age-related diseases with multiple contributing factors, including brain inflammation. Microglia, and specifically those expressing the AD risk gene TREM2, are considered important players in AD, but their exact contribution to pathology remains unclear. In this study, using high-throughput mass cytometry in the 5×FAD mouse model of amyloidosis, we identified senescent microglia that express high levels of TREM2 but also exhibit a distinct signature from TREM2-dependent disease-associated microglia (DAM). This senescent microglial protein signature was found in various mouse models that show cognitive decline, including aging, amyloidosis and tauopathy. TREM2-null mice had fewer microglia with a senescent signature. Treating 5×FAD mice with the senolytic BCL2 family inhibitor ABT-737 reduced senescent microglia, but not the DAM population, and this was accompanied by improved cognition and reduced brain inflammation. Our results suggest a dual and opposite involvement of TREM2 in microglial states, which must be considered when contemplating TREM2 as a therapeutic target in AD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by several disease-escalating factors1,2, including local brain inflammation driven by innate immune cells, which significantly contributes to cognitive impairment3. Genome-wide association studies have identified immune-related genes as risk factors in disease onset and severity, some of which are expressed by microglia4,5,6, the resident innate immune cells of the brain7,8. Among the identified genes is triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2), a polymorphism that is considered a risk factor in late-onset AD5,6. Microglia undergo profound changes in response to pathological conditions9. For example, in animal models of amyloidosis, the expression of TREM2 is intricately linked to the state of microglial activation9,10,11. Moreover, TREM2-dependent activated microglia, disease-associated microglia (DAM), were found to cluster around amyloid plaques9.
Aging is recognized as a major risk factor for sporadic AD12,13. A known manifestation of aging is senescent cell accumulation14. Senescent cells are defined by stable cell cycle arrest, persistent DNA damage response and a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)14. Through continuous secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, senescent cells contribute to the chronic tissue inflammation associated with aging14. Over the last two decades, accumulated evidence has supported the contention that the immune system plays a pivotal role in supporting lifelong brain maintenance and functional plasticity15,16,17 and has linked AD to the aging of the immune system18,19. With respect to microglia, it remains unclear whether the activated microglia that fail to support the brain in aging or in AD are themselves becoming senescent or whether they are outcomes of distinct cellular pathways.
In the present study, we identified a new state of microglia, termed senescent, which unexpectedly expressed a high level of TREM2 but exhibited a distinct protein signature than that of the TREM2-dependent activated microglia, known as DAM. A similar signature of senescent microglia was seen in aging as well as in mouse models of AD and tauopathy. Senolytic treatment reduced the level of TREM2-expressing senescent microglia, with no effect on the levels of the DAM population, highlighting the heterogeneity of TREM2-expressing microglia and their potential contrasting impact on disease pathology.
Results
Protein signature of senescent microglia
To identify and characterize microglia with a senescent signature, we assessed the expression of myeloid cell markers and markers characteristic of senescence (Extended Data Table 1). Using mass cytometry (CyTOF), we observed a distinct population of microglia with a characteristic senescent signature in the brains of aged mice (24 months; Fig. 1a–c), mouse models of familial AD (5×FAD20; Fig. 1d–f) and tauopathy (DMhTAU21; Fig. 1g,h). Microglia were defined as myeloid cells that do not express the monocyte markers Ly-6g/c and CCR2 (refs. 22,23). Resting microglia were defined as cells that do not express the activation marker CD11c (refs. 9,24,25) but expressed markers characteristic of homeostatic microglia (CD11b (refs. 9,26), P2RY12 (refs. 27,28) and CX3CR1 (refs. 9,29)). Senescent cells were defined as cells expressing senescence markers, including p16 (refs. 30,31,32), p19 (refs. 32,33), pp38 (refs. 32,34), γH2AX (refs. 32,35), p21 (refs. 32,36) and p53 (refs. 32,37). Unexpectedly, we found that the microglia that expressed senescence markers also expressed some of the characteristic features of homeostatic microglia9, including TMEM119 (refs. 9,38), P2RY12 (refs. 27,28) and CX3CR1 (refs. 9,29), as well as markers associated with activated microglia, including TREM2 (refs. 9,39,40), ApoE (refs. 9,41,42), C5aR (ref. 43), Cd115 (ref. 44), SiglecH (ref. 45) and CD39 (ref. 46) (Fig. 1a,d,g). Of note, aged wild-type (WT) mice had a higher number of senescent microglia with a higher variability among individuals within the group relative to the young mice (Fig. 1c). In addition, we found an accumulation of senescent microglia in 5×FAD mice when comparing with age-matched WT mice (Fig. 1f). Overall, the signature of the senescent microglia included multiple proteins characteristic of senescent cells as well as high levels of TREM2 and ApoE (Fig. 1g). The high correlation between the signature of the senescent microglia in aging and AD (Fig. 1h) could explain the strong association between these conditions.
TREM2 is associated with a state switch of microglia from resting to activated in animal models of amyloidosis (for example, 5×FAD), where microglia acquire the DAM state9,10,11,47. This state represents TREM2-expressing activated cells. To evaluate the potential connection between TREM2 expression and the senescent microglial phenotype, we compared, within the same individual 5×FAD mice, the levels of TREM2 in microglia bearing the DAM signature versus microglia with a senescent signature. We found that, within each tested mouse, levels of TREM2 expressed by senescent microglia were significantly higher than TREM2 levels expressed by the DAM (Fig. 2a). Moreover, within the senescent microglial population, levels of TREM2 significantly correlated with the expression levels of the senescence markers (Fig. 2b). To further verify the potential functional link between TREM2 expression and senescent microglia accumulation, we examined whether fewer senescent microglia would accumulate in 5×FAD mice that are missing TREM2 (TREM2-null 5×FAD). Thus, we assessed the levels of senescent microglia in TREM2-null 5×FAD mice. The number of senescent microglia in these mice was significantly lower than in age-matched TREM2-intact 5×FAD mice, suggesting that TREM2 is involved in senescent microglia accumulation (Fig. 2c–e).
TREM2-activated microglia were previously seen in close proximity to amyloid plaque accumulation48; therefore, we performed immunostaining to examine whether senesecent microglia have a different spatial distribution. We immunostained cortical sections of mice and postmortem human AD, using antibodies directed to IBA-1, γH2AX and amyloid-beta (Aβ) (Fig. 3). In both postmortem human brain samples and mouse brains, we detected γH2AX immunostained microglia in brain area where amyloid plaques were seen, although these microglia were not necessarily present in close proximity to the plaques (Fig. 3a,b).
In our initial analysis using CyTOF, we found that senescent microglia exhibit high levels of both TREM2 and ApoE (Fig. 1g). It is worth noting that the ApoE/TREM2/ERK signaling pathway was previously linked to the induction of senescent neutrophils49. Therefore, we further investigated whether ApoE expression and TREM2 expression in our dataset are interconnected. Our analysis revealed a significant positive correlation in expression of these two markers (Extended Data Fig. 2). Furthermore, ApoE expression demonstrated a positive correlation with markers of senescence, similar to the observed association with TREM2 (Extended Data Fig. 2). These findings suggest that senescent microglia may accumulate through a mechanism involving the ApoE/TREM2/ERK signaling pathway, similar to senescent neutrophils.
The transcriptional profile of senescent microglia
The comparison between the protein expression signature of DAM and senescent microglia, described here, revealed that senescent microglia have a signature distinct from the DAM. In contrast to the DAM, senescent microglia express high levels of homeostatic microglial markers (Extended Data Fig. 1). We further investigated the transcriptomic signature of the senescent microglia by conducting a meta-analysis of previously published single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) data of WT, TREM2−/− WT, TREM2+/+5×FAD and TREM2−/−5×FAD mice50 (Fig. 4a–c). We detected a cluster of senescent microglia, cluster 2, that appeared in TREM2+/+5×FAD mice but was almost entirely absent in the other groups (Fig. 4a,d–f). This cluster was identified as senescent based on the SenMayo gene set51 (Fig. 4g) and showed a significant upregulation of TREM2, ApoE, CD9 and CD11c (Fig. 4h), similar to the senescent microglial cluster identified at the protein level by CyTOF (Fig. 1). The transcriptional signature of cluster 2 was similar to a previously described subtype of microglia, highly activated microglia, which appear only in aged mice41 (Fig. 4h) and, thus, shared with these microglia many differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including ApoE, Lpl, Lgals3, Cst7, Cd74, Cd63, Lilrb4a, Axl, Itgax, Cd83, Cd9, Lgals3bp, B2m, Csf2ra, Tyrobp, Crlf2, Cd34, Ccl4, Lyz2, Hif1a, Csf1 and Cd68 (ref. 41) (the list of all DEGs of each cluster is available in Supplementary Table 1). Notably, although the two microglia populations highly expressing TREM2, namely the DAM and senescent microglia, displayed distinct protein profiles (Extended Data Fig. 1), discerning the differences at the transcriptional level proved challenging. This observation is consistent with the notion that transcriptomic analysis does not always reflect protein expression due to sensitivity limitations, stability concerns and the influence of post-translational modifications. Previous research demonstrated that TREM2 is expressed by white matter-associated microglia (WAM) in aged mice52, which partially share the signature characteristics of DAM. WAM formation is TREM2 dependent but ApoE independent and occurs as part of the normal aging process52. We, therefore, hypothesized that analysis of the WAM population might allow us to identify distinct signatures of TREM2-activated microglia and senescent microglia at the transcriptomic level. We conducted a comparative analysis of the transcriptomic signatures of cluster 2 senescent cells and WAM52. Our analysis revealed 102 DEGs by senescent microglia cluster; only 15 of them shared with the 241 DEGs of WAM, implying that these two populations represent distinct subtypes of TREM2-expressing microglia. The fact that, at the transcriptomic level, the WAM, unlike DAM, showed a different transcriptomic signature compared to senescent microglia suggests possible regional variations among activated microglial phenotypes within the brain.
Senolysis of senescent microglia in AD
To examine the potential impact of TREM2-expressing senescent microglia on AD manifestation, we treated 10–11-month-old 5×FAD mice with either 25 mg kg−1 day−1 of the senolytic Bcl-2 family inhibitor ABT-737 (refs. 53,54) or vehicle control. Two cohorts of mice were used in this study. The mice from the two cohorts were evaluated by behavioral tests. After testing, the brains from the first cohort were excised to determine the protein expression profile of microglia, and the brains from the second cohort were excised and tested for their level of inflammatory cytokines. Analysis of the microglial protein expression profile after the treatment showed a significant reduction in the accumulation of senescent microglia in the mice treated with the senolytic drug relative to control mice (Fig. 5a–d). Senolytic treatment did not affect DAM percentages (Extended Data Fig. 3), but TREM2-independent activated microglia percentage increased (Extended Data Fig. 3). Of note, 2 weeks after ABT-737 injections, splenocytes were collected, and the peripheral immune cell profiling revealed no changes caused by the senolytic drug (Extended Data Fig. 4). The behavioral results from both cohorts were pooled together for analyses. Specifically, we tested the animals for anxiety, mobility and recognition memory by using the open field and novel object recognition (NOR) tests, respectively55 (Fig. 5e). We found no effect on anxiety as assessed by time spent in the center of the arena (Extended Data Fig. 5a) and no effect in open field behavior, as measured by the speed of movement and distance (Extended Data Fig. 5b,c). However, we observed a significant improvement in object recognition memory, measured by NOR, after the senolytic treatment (Fig. 5e). Analysis by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the excised brains revealed a significant reduction in their levels in the 5×FAD mice treated with the senolytic drug relative to those treated with vehicle control (Fig. 5f). These results support our contention that TREM2-expressing microglia represent heterogeneous populations of microglia with distinct signatures and differential activity and indicate that senescent microglia might play a role in neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment.
Discussion
Here we show accumulation of senescent microglia with a conserved signature across brain conditions, including aging and amyloidosis. We further show that high levels of TREM2 expression characterize this shared senescent microglial signature. The TREM2-dependent senescent microglia and the TREM2-dependent activated microglia, DAM, display distinct protein signatures. Senolytic treatment reduced the level of TREM2-expressing senescent microglia, with no effect on the levels of the DAM population. This indicates that TREM2-expressing microglia are not a homogenous population of cells. Moreover, depletion of senescent cells, including, but not limited to, microglia, led to improved cognitive performance and reduced expression levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the brain.
Our present results demonstrate a distinction between activated and senescent microglia. These findings are in line with reported results, showing that degenerative neuronal structures positive for tau (neuropil threads, neurofibrillary tangles and neurotic plaques) are invariably co-localized with severely dystrophic, rather than activated, microglial cells56,57. These studies further suggested that progressive, aging-related dystrophic microglia contribute more to AD than activated ones. Other studies identified senescent microglia and astrocytes in mouse models of tauopathy58 and aging59. Accordingly, consistent with our findings, several studies highlighted the key role played by senescent cells in the brain during AD.
Polymorphism in the TREM2 gene has been linked to the disease severity in patients with AD50. Multiple studies documented the presence of microglia expressing TREM2 in close proximity to the amyloid plaques9. Furthermore, TREM2 appears to promote the proliferation of microglia and their adoption of the DAM profile9,60. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the TREM2-expressing microglia may not constitute a homogenous population, a possibility that was overlooked in those studies. Moreover, the TREM2-activated microglial contribution to the disease progresson could differ in different disease stages. Our data show that TREM2-dependent senescent microglia and homeostatic microglia share markers, such as TMEM119, P2YR12 and CX3CR1. These results, together with the analysis of published transcriptomic data, suggest that TREM2-expressing activated microglia, DAM, and the senescent microglial population are not identical cells and do not represent a continuum of activation states but, rather, are the outcome of activation of a distinct cellular pathway. These results could also explain why attempts to directly activate TREM2 in mouse models of amyloidosis as a therapeutic strategy have shown only limited beneficial effects in preclinical studies61. In support of our findings, a recent study identified a microglial cluster that is upregulated in aged mice compared to juvenile mice and expresses elevated levels of TREM2 (ref. 62). In another study, a subtype of microglia with high expression of ApoE emerged after injection of apoptotic neurons into WT mouse brains42. This microglial subtype was detected in aged and APP-PS1 mice but was diminished in APP-PS1 TREM2−/− animals42. Similarly, the cluster of senescent microglia in our dataset showed high expression of ApoE in both 5×FAD mice and aged mice, and the percentage of this cluster was lower in TREM2−/−5×FAD mice. Our results highlight a strong association among TREM2, senescent microglia and AD. Recently, ApoE/TREM2/ERK signaling was linked to the induction of senescent neutrophils in prostate cancer. TREM2 is activated by tumor ApoE secretion and promotes senescence in immune-suppressive neutrophils through ERK (ref. 49). As senescent microglia upregulate both ApoE and TREM2, it is possible that they contribute to the senescence induction in microglia through a mechanism similar to their involvement in neutrophils. In future studies, it will be intriguing to investigate this mechanism and the accumulation of senescent microglia in TREM2-null mice in different models, such as aging mice. Such investigations will contribute to further understanding of whether this mechanism is specific to AD or it is a more general phenomenon.
The treatment with the senolytic Bcl2 family inhibitor drug ABT-737 (refs. 53,54) led to the elimination of TREM2-dependent senescent microglia, but not of DAM, and was accompanied by improved cognitive performance in an AD mouse model. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the favorable outcome on cognitive performance was also due to the elimination of senescent cells of other cell lineages beyond microglia, as other studies identified additional brain senescent cells, such as oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, in an AD mouse model63. In addition, no effect on levels of peripheral immune cells was observed at the time that the mice were assessed for behavior (Extended Data Fig. 4), which may suggest that the observed major effect of the senolytic drug was due to removal of senescent cells within the brain. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the senolytic drugs affected peripheral immune cells at earlier stages or affected skull bone marrow–derived cells, which were not included in the present study. After the elimination of senescent cells, the improved cognitive performance in 5×FAD mice was associated with a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines. This supports the suggestion that local brain inflammation is a major pathological factor contributing to cognitive deterioration, as found in other studies in mice18,64 and in human disease3.
Overall, this study suggests that TREM2 displays a dual activity in microglia, which should be carefully considered when contemplating TREM2 as a therapeutic target65. In addition, this study suggests that targeting senescent cells may open new potential therapeutic strategies for AD, which might be effective even at late disease stages. The senolytic drugs available today have limited applicability to humans due to their side effects and lack of specificity53,66. In the future, efforts should be made to develop new senolytic therapies that exclusively target senescent cells or, specifically, senescent microglia. Recent findings have shown a beneficial effect of targeting the inhibitory immune checkpoint pathway PD-1/PD-L1 in animal models of AD and tauopathy, through a mechanism that involves reduction of inflammation67,68,69,70; additionally, it was shown that the same treatment reduces the abundance of senescent cells in all tested tissues71,72. It is, therefore, possible that the beneficial effect of blocking PD-L1 in animal models of AD could also involve elimination of senescent microglia.
Taken together, the present study highlights an unprecedented dual role for TREM2 in microglial activation and senescence. Although, in the past, TREM2 was uniformly considered to be protective in late-onset AD, here we show that microglia expressing high levels of TREM2 could be detrimental. This complexity should be carefully considered when targeting TREM2 as a therapeutic approach.
Methods
Mice
Three mouse models were used in this study: (1) heterozygous 5×FAD transgenic mice (on a C57/BL6-SJL background), which express familial AD mutant forms of human APP (the Swedish mutation, K670N/M671L; the Florida mutation, I716V; and the London mutation, V717I), and PS1 (M146L/L286V) transgenes under transcriptional control of the neuron-specific mouse Ty-1 promoter20 (5×FAD line Tg6799, The Jackson Laboratory); (2) Trem2−/−5×FAD and Trem2+/+5×FAD mice on a C57/BL6 background, obtained from the laboratory of Marco Colonna (Washington University), where they were generated as previously described73; and (3) heterozygous DMhTAU transgenic mice, bearing two mutations (K257T/P301S) in the human-tau (hTAU) gene (double mutant (DM); on a BALBc-C57/BL6 background), associated with severe disease manifestations of frontotemporal dementia in humans21, expressed under the natural tau promoter. Genotyping was performed by PCR analysis of tail DNA. Throughout the study, WT controls in each experiment were non-transgenic littermates from the relevant mouse colonies. Mice were bred and maintained by the animal breeding center of the Weizmann Institute of Science. All experiments detailed here were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Weizmann Institute of Science.
Elimination of senescent cells in vivo
For selective elimination of senescent cells, mice were subjected to three consecutive daily intraperitoneal injections of ABT-737 (25 mg kg−1 body weight; Selleck Chemicals) or vehicle as a control, 2 weeks before the behavior assessment, administered as described54. ABT-737 and DMSO-based vehicle were prepared in a working solution (30% propylene glycol, 5% Tween 80 and 3.3% dextrose in water, pH 4–5).
Brain dissociation to a single-cell suspension
Mice were euthanized using ketamine–xylazine, followed by transcardial perfusion with cold PBS and whole-brain excision. Next, the brains were diced and incubated with RPMI supplemented with 0.4 mg ml−1 Collagenase IV (Worthington Biochemical), 2 mM HEPES (Biological Industries), 10 μg ml−1 DNase (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2% FCS. Then, the first brain program of gentleMACS (Miltenyi Biotec) was used for tissue dissociation, followed by incubation for 20 min in a 37 °C shaker. After 10-min incubation, cells were homogenized again, using the gentleMACS brain program 2. After the incubation, the samples were processed by brain program 3 in the gentleMACS for three repeats. The enzymatic reaction was stopped using cold RPMI supplemented with 0.5 M EDTA (0.2%). Then, the cells were filtered (100-μm nylon mesh) and isolated using 30% Percoll (GE Healthcare (17–0891–01)) density gradient centrifugation (23,500g, 30 min, 4 °C) and pelleted, filtered again (70-μm nylon mesh) and rewashed.
Conjugation of metals to antibodies
Antibodies were conjugated to metals using the MIBItag Conjugation Kit (IONpath), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Metals for conjugation were chosen to minimize noise and spillover between channels, according to guidelines in Han et al.74. Extended Data Table 1 specifies the antibodies and the metal used to label each antibody in Fig. 1, and Extended Data Table 2 specifies the antibodies and the metal used to label each antibody in Figs. 2 and 5.
CyTOF sample preparation
The single-cell suspensions of brain cells were stained by 1.25 μM Cell-ID cisplatin in Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer (Fluidigm). Then, the samples were washed twice with Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer. Next, they were incubated with Fc‐block CD16/32 (BD Biosciences; 10 min, room temperature), followed by incubation with the antibodies for extracellular markers (60 min, 4 °C). The samples were fixed and resuspended with 4% formaldehyde (Pierce) for 10 min, and washed and kept on ice for 10 min. The cells were permeabilized using 90% methanol for 15 min on ice, blocked with 1% donkey serum and stained with antibodies for intracellular markers in buffer with 1% phosphatase inhibitor for 60 min at room temperature. Next, the samples were washed twice and kept in 4% formaldehyde (Pierce) with iridium (125 pM) at 4 °C overnight. On the day of analysis, the samples were washed twice with Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer and then washed twice with Maxpar water (Fluidigm) before acquisition, using a CyTOF 2 upgraded to a Helios system (Fluidigm); before the reading, the cells were filtered (40-μm nylon mesh). A detailed list of antibodies used is provided in the supplementary materials (Extended Data Table 1). No barcoding was used.
CyTOF data processing and analysis
CyTOF data underwent the following pre-processing before analyses. The CyTOF software by Fluidigm was used to normalize and concatenate the acquired data. Then, gates were applied using the Cytobank platform (Beckman Coulter). First, the CD11b stable signal across time was gated and then the event length and the Gaussian residual parameters. Then, the beads were gated out using the 140Ce beads channel. Live single cells were gated using the cisplatin 195Pt and the iridium DNA label in 193Ir, and single cells were gated using the two channels for iridium. Lastly, we gated for CD45+ cells. The gating strategy is illustrated in Extended Data Fig. 6.
The CyTOF data were analyzed using Cytobank and MATLAB. In Cytobank, CD45+ cells were processed with equal sampling. The two-dimensional reduction was applied using the Cytobank ‘visne’ (Vi-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (Vi-SNE)) method, and FlowSOM-based clustering was performed. Figure 1: the aged mice experiment included 19,438 CD45+ cells per sample; the 5×FAD mice experiment included 23,434 CD45+ cells per sample. Figure 2: the experiment included 17,176 CD45+ cells per sample. Figure 4: the experiment included 17,242 CD45+ cells per sample. The median expression of each cluster was averaged to create a single heatmap for each experiment using MATLAB. The t-tests and correlation analysis were done in MATLAB. See raw data for the complete MATLAB code.
Cognitive assessment
Each mouse was subjected to a daily 3-min handling session for five successive days before the first behavioral test. The investigators performing behavioral testing were blinded to the treatment group of the mice throughout the experiments. Testing sessions were recorded and analyzed using the EthoVision tracking system XT 11 (Noldus Information Technology). The behavioral results shown are combined from two independent experiments.
NOR
The NOR test, which provides an index of recognition memory55, was performed using a protocol modified from Bevins and Besheer75. A square gray box (45 × 45 × 50 cm) with visual cues on the walls was used. The task spanned 2 days and three trials: a habituation trial, a 20-min session in the empty apparatus (day 1); a familiarization trial, a 10-min session allowing the mice to interact with two identical objects (day 2); and a test trial: after a 1-h inter-trial interval, each mouse was returned to the apparatus for a 6-min session, in which one of the objects was replaced by a novel one. Novel object preference was calculated as follows: percent novel object exploration = ((novel object exploration time) / (novel object exploration time + familiar object exploration time)) × 100.
Open field and anxiety
A square gray box (45 × 45 × 50 cm) was used to perform the test. Videos of a habituation trial consisting of a 20-min session in the empty apparatus (day 1 of NOR) were analyzed for cumulative duration in the center zone(s), distance moved (cm), mean velocity, frequency entering the center zone and latency to the first entrance to the center zone.
RNA purification, cDNA synthesis and quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Mice were transcardially perfused with PBS before tissue excision. Cortex tissues were isolated from the brain under a dissecting microscope (Stemi DV4, Zeiss) and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin RNA Mini Kit (Macherey-Nagel, 740955.50), and mRNA (2 μg) was converted into cDNA using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). The expression of specific mRNAs was measured using fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR (rt–qPCR; Fast-SYBR PCR Master Mix, Applied Biosystems). Quantification reactions were performed in duplicates for each sample using the ‘ΔΔCt’ method. Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) was chosen as a reference (housekeeping) gene.
The primers used are shown in Table 1.
rt–qPCR reactions were performed and analyzed using StepOne software version 2.2.2 (Applied Biosystems) and QuantStudio 3 software.
Flow cytometry
Mice were transcardially perfused with PBS before tissue extraction. Spleens were mashed with the plunger of a syringe and treated with ammonium chloride potassium (ACK) lysing buffer to remove erythrocytes. Before immunostaining, all samples were filtered through a 70-μm nylon mesh and blocked with anti-Fc CD16/32 (1:40; BD Biosciences) (Table 2). The samples were fixed, permeabilized and subsequently stained using FOXP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience, 00–5523-00), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Analysis of snRNA-seq data
We obtained data from Zhou et al. (GSE140511)50. Details about sample processing, sequencing and initial quality control can be found in the original publication50. We accessed the gene–cell count matrices and cell barcode data from 7-month-old female WT mice (n = 3); 7-month-old female TREM2−/− mice (n = 3); 7-month-old female TREM+/+5×FAD mice (n = 3); and 7-month-old female TREM2−/−5×FAD mice (n = 3). Analyses were performed using RStudio 2022.12.0. Following Seurat’s (version 3.2.2) guidelines for quality control76 and Zhou et al.’s fine-tuning parameters, we created a Seurat object and performed statistical analyses of the data. In brief, cells having fewer than 200 genes and genes that appear in fewer than five cells were filtered out. Similarly, cells having more than 5% mitochondrial genes were also filtered out. Then, NormalizeData, ScaleData, RunPCA, FindNeighbors, FindClusters and RunUMAP functions were activated according to object-tailored dimensions for principal components (PCs) (PCs were estimated based on ‘JackStraw’ analysis and ElbowPlot). Cell type was determined using unsupervised mapping of the ChenBrainData dataset from the scRNA-seq package and the MouseRNAseqData dataset from the celldex package. Afterwards, microglia and macrophages were subsetted, and Seurat objects were integrated to create a single integrated object of microglia and macrophages, on which we recalculated data dimensionality and performed scaling using SCTransform, RunPCA, FindNeighbors, FindClusters and RunUMAP functions. Clustering was performed by selecting eight PCs after ‘JackStraw’ and ElbowPlot analyses, after which ‘clustree’ guided our selection for a resolution of 0.4 in FindClusters. Accordingly, RunUMAP was established.
Figure 4a,b,d,e,g,h was created using the DimPlot, FeaturePlot, ggplot2 and EnhancedVolcano packages. Figure 4c is based on DEGs found between cells of cluster 2 and the rest of the cells in the object. Pathways were deducted from the KEGG database using Cytoscape version 3.9.1 and the STRING application. Significant pathways having q values less than 0.05 are described.
To compare between our cluster 2 and WAM DEGs, we used Venn diagrams to represent mutual and unique genes found in each group. Cluster 2’s DEG list was produced by employing FindAllMarkers (from the Seurat R package) and extracting cluster 2’s DEGs (117 genes, using adjusted P < 0.05 and log2fold change (FC) > 0.25). The WAM DEG list was adopted from Supplementary Table 3 from Safaiyan et al.52. Venn diagrams were produced with the online tool https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/. Pathway analysis was done using Cytoscape after importing the mutual and unique DEGs in each group.
Immunofluorescence and imaging
For immunofluorescence studies, mice were euthanized and intracardially perfused with PBS, and brains were extracted and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and then moved to 1% paraformaldehyde for overnight or longer. Tissue processing and immunohistochemistry were performed on paraffin-embedded sectioned mouse brain (6 μm thick). After de-paraffinization, antigen retrieval was performed in citric acid (pH 6). Sudan black (0.1%) treatment (room temperature, 10 min) and acetone (−20 °C, 7 min) were performed before staining to reduce autofluorescence. Slides were blocked in Cas (Invitrogen, 008120) with 0.5% Triton and then stained using the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-Aβ (1:100, BioLegend, 803001); rabbit anti-γH2AX (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, CST-2577); and rat anti-IBA-1 (1:50, Abcam, ab283346). For γH2AX, additional amplification was used with anti-rabbit biotin (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711-065-152, 1:100) in PBS with 1% Cas and 0.5% Triton. Secondary antibodies used included donkey streptavidin-cy2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 016-160-084, 1:100), donkey anti-rat cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 705-165-147, 1:150) and donkey anti-mouse cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-175-151, 1:150). The slides were exposed to Hoechst nuclear staining (1:4,000; Invitrogen probes) for 30 s.
For immunofluorescence on human samples, paraffin-embedded human brain temporal cortex sections of postmortem AD patients were obtained from the Oxford Brain Bank (formerly known as the Thomas Willis Oxford Brain Collection) with appropriate consent and ethics committee approval by the Weizmann Institutional Review Board. After de-paraffinization, antigen retrieval was performed in Tris-EDTA (pH 9). Sudan black (0.1%) treatment (room temperature, 10 min) and acetone (−20 °C, 7 min) were performed before staining to reduce autofluorescence. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Aβ (1:100, BioLegend, 803001); rabbit anti-γH2AX (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology, CST-2577); and rat anti-IBA-1 (1:50, Abcam, ab283346). For signal amplification for γH2AX detection, anti-rabbit biotin (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711-065-152, 1:100) was used in PBS with 1% Cas and 0.5% Triton. Secondary antibodies used included donkey streptavidin-cy2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 016-160-084, 1:100), donkey anti-rat cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 705-165-147, 1:150) and donkey anti-mouse cy5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 715-175-151, 1:150). The slides were exposed to Hoechst nuclear staining (1:4,000; Invitrogen probes) for 30 s. Representative images were captured using a confocal microscope (Andor Dragonfly spinning disk confocal microscope, ×20 lens), and Fusion software was used for image capture. Representative images were merged and optimized using ImageJ software.
Statistical analysis
Data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested. The data were analyzed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test to compare between two groups; one-way ANOVA was used to compare several groups; and Fisher’s least significant difference test or Tukey or Bonferroni corrections were used for pairwise comparisons. Data from behavioral tests were analyzed using ANOVA and a Fisher’s least significant difference test for pairwise follow-up comparison. Sample sizes were chosen with adequate statistical power based on the literature and past experience, and mice were allocated to experimental groups according to age, sex and genotype. Investigators were blinded to the identity of the groups during experiments and outcome assessment. All inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-established according to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Results are presented as mean ± s.e.m. Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Data to reproduce the figures are available as of the date of publication at https://github.com/noarachmian/Trem2_senescent_microglia (ref. 77).
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper will be available from the lead contact upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The code is available as of the date of publication at https://github.com/noarachmian/Trem2_senescent_microglia (ref. 77).
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper will be available from the lead contact upon reasonable request.
References
De Strooper, B. & Karran, E. The cellular phase of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 164, 603–615 (2016).
Wyss-Coray, T. & Rogers, J. Inflammation in Alzheimer disease—a brief review of the basic science and clinical literature. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006346 (2012).
Pascoal, T. A. et al. Microglial activation and tau propagate jointly across Braak stages. Nat. Med. 27, 1592–1599 (2021).
Moore, Z., Taylor, J. M. & Crack, P. J. The involvement of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease: a new dog in the fight. Br. J. Pharmacol. 176, 3533–3543 (2019).
Guerreiro, R. et al. TREM2 variants in Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 117–127 (2013).
Jonsson, T. et al. Variant of TREM2 associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 107–116 (2013).
Matcovitch-Natan, O. et al. Microglia development follows a stepwise program to regulate brain homeostasis. Science 353, aad8670 (2016).
Castellani, G. & Schwartz, M. Immunological features of non-neuronal brain cells: implications for Alzheimer’s disease immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. 41, 794–804 (2020).
Keren-Shaul, H. et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169, 1276–1290 (2017).
Karanfilian, L., Tosto, M. G. & Malki, K. The role of TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease; evidence from transgenic mouse models. Neurobiol. Aging 86, 39–53 (2020).
Ulrich, J. D., Ulland, T. K., Colonna, M. & Holtzman, D. M. Elucidating the role of TREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 94, 237–248 (2017).
Rea, I. M. et al. Age and age-related diseases: role of inflammation triggers and cytokines. Front. Immunol. 9, 586 (2018).
Jaul, E. & Barron, J. Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front. Public Health 5, 335 (2017).
Di Micco, R., Krizhanovsky, V., Baker, D. & d’Adda di Fagagna, F. Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 75–95 (2021).
Baruch, K. et al. Aging-induced type I interferon response at the choroid plexus negatively affects brain function. Science 346, 89–93 (2014).
Kipnis, J., Cohen, H., Cardon, M., Ziv, Y. & Schwartz, M. T cell deficiency leads to cognitive dysfunction: implications for therapeutic vaccination for schizophrenia and other psychiatric conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8180–8185 (2004).
Ziv, Y. et al. Immune cells contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis and spatial learning abilities in adulthood. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 268–275 (2006).
Baruch, K. et al. Breaking immune tolerance by targeting Foxp3+ regulatory T cells mitigates Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Nat. Commun. 6, 7967 (2015).
Giunta, B. et al. Inflammaging as a prodrome to Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation 5, 51 (2008).
Oakley, H. et al. Intraneuronal β-amyloid aggregates, neurodegeneration, and neuron loss in transgenic mice with five familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations: potential factors in amyloid plaque formation. J. Neurosci. 26, 10129–10140 (2006).
Rosenmann, H. et al. A novel transgenic mouse expressing double mutant tau driven by its natural promoter exhibits tauopathy characteristics. Exp. Neurol. 212, 71–84 (2008).
Palframan, R. T. et al. Inflammatory chemokine transport and presentation in HEV: a remote control mechanism for monocyte recruitment to lymph nodes in inflamed tissues. J. Exp. Med. 194, 1361–1374 (2001).
Yang, J., Zhang, L., Yu, C., Yang, X.-F. & Wang, H. Monocyte and macrophage differentiation: circulation inflammatory monocyte as biomarker for inflammatory diseases. Biomark. Res. 2, 1 (2014).
Kamphuis, W., Kooijman, L., Schetters, S., Orre, M. & Hol, E. M. Transcriptional profiling of CD11c-positive microglia accumulating around amyloid plaques in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 1847–1860 (2016).
Carroll, J. A., Striebel, J. F., Baune, C., Chesebro, B. & Race, B. CD11c is not required by microglia to convey neuroprotection after prion infection. PLoS ONE 18, e0293301 (2023).
Hickman, S. E. et al. The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1896–1905 (2013).
Haynes, S. E. et al. The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1512–1519 (2006).
Mildner, A., Huang, H., Radke, J., Stenzel, W. & Priller, J. P2Y12 receptor is expressed on human microglia under physiological conditions throughout development and is sensitive to neuroinflammatory diseases. Glia 65, 375–387 (2017).
Merino, J. J., Muñetón-Gómez, V., Alvárez, M.-I. & Toledano-Díaz, A. Effects of CX3CR1 and Fractalkine chemokines in amyloid beta clearance and p-tau accumulation in Alzheimerʼs disease (AD) rodent models: is Fractalkine a systemic biomarker for AD? Curr. Alzheimer Res. 13, 403–412 (2016).
Lowe, S. W. & Sherr, C. J. Tumor suppression by Ink4a–Arf: progress and puzzles. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 77–83 (2003).
Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).
Burton, D. G. & Krizhanovsky, V. Physiological and pathological consequences of cellular senescence. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 4373–4386 (2014).
Palmero, I., Pantoja, C. & Serrano, M. p19ARF links the tumour suppressor p53 to Ras. Nature 395, 125–126 (1998).
Freund, A., Patil, C. K. & Campisi, J. p38MAPK is a novel DNA damage response‐independent regulator of the senescence‐associated secretory phenotype. EMBO J. 30, 1536–1548 (2011).
Di Micco, R. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444, 638–642 (2006).
Beauséjour, C. M. et al. Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways. EMBO J. 22, 4212–4222 (2003).
Vaziri, H. et al. ATM‐dependent telomere loss in aging human diploid fibroblasts and DNA damage lead to the post‐translational activation of p53 protein involving poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase. EMBO J. 16, 6018–6033 (1997).
Mercurio, D. et al. Protein expression of the microglial marker Tmem119 decreases in association with morphological changes and location in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 820127 (2022).
Gisslén, M. et al. CSF concentrations of soluble TREM2 as a marker of microglial activation in HIV-1 infection. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 6, e512 (2018).
Cantoni, C. et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cell activation in response to demyelination in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 129, 429–447 (2015).
Jin, C. et al. A unique type of highly-activated microglia evoking brain inflammation via Mif/Cd74 signaling axis in aged mice. Aging Dis. 12, 2125–2139 (2021).
Krasemann, S. et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity 47, 566–581 (2017).
Gasque, P., Singhrao, S. K., Neal, J. W., Götze, O. & Morgan, B. P. Expression of the receptor for complement C5a (CD88) is up-regulated on reactive astrocytes, microglia, and endothelial cells in the inflamed human central nervous system. Am. J. Pathol. 150, 31–41 (1997).
Olmos-Alonso, A. et al. Pharmacological targeting of CSF1R inhibits microglial proliferation and prevents the progression of Alzheimer’s-like pathology. Brain 139, 891–907 (2016).
Kopatz, J. et al. Siglec‐h on activated microglia for recognition and engulfment of glioma cells. Glia 61, 1122–1133 (2013).
Jakovljevic, M. et al. Induction of NTPDase1/CD39 by reactive microglia and macrophages is associated with the functional state during EAE. Front. Neurosci. 13, 410 (2019).
Dvir-Szternfeld, R. et al. Alzheimer’s disease modification mediated by bone marrow-derived macrophages via a TREM2-independent pathway in mouse model of amyloidosis. Nat. Aging 2, 60–73 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. TREM2-mediated early microglial response limits diffusion and toxicity of amyloid plaques. J. Exp. Med. 213, 667–675 (2016).
Bancaro, N. et al. Apolipoprotein E induces pathogenic senescent-like myeloid cells in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 41, 602–619.e11 (2023).
Zhou, Y. et al. Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 26, 131–142 (2020).
Saul, D. et al. A new gene set identifies senescent cells and predicts senescence-associated pathways across tissues. Nat. Commun. 13, 4827 (2022).
Safaiyan, S. et al. White matter aging drives microglial diversity. Neuron 109, 1100–1117 (2021).
Ovadya, Y. & Krizhanovsky, V. Strategies targeting cellular senescence. J. Clin. Invest. 128, 1247–1254 (2018).
Yosef, R. et al. Directed elimination of senescent cells by inhibition of BCL-W and BCL-XL. Nat. Commun. 7, 11190 (2016).
Leger, M. et al. Object recognition test in mice. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2531–2537 (2013).
Streit, W. J., Khoshbouei, H. & Bechmann, I. Dystrophic microglia in late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 68, 845–854 (2020).
Streit, W. J., Braak, H., Xue, Q.-S. & Bechmann, I. Dystrophic (senescent) rather than activated microglial cells are associated with tau pathology and likely precede neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 475–485 (2009).
Bussian, T. J. et al. Clearance of senescent glial cells prevents tau-dependent pathology and cognitive decline. Nature 562, 578–582 (2018).
Talma, N., Gerrits, E., Wang, B., Eggen, B. J. & Demaria, M. Identification of distinct and age‐dependent p16High microglia subtypes. Aging Cell 20, e13450 (2021).
Schlepckow, K. et al. Enhancing protective microglial activities with a dual function TREM2 antibody to the stalk region. EMBO Mol. Med. 12, e11227 (2020).
Jain, N., Lewis, C. A., Ulrich, J. D. & Holtzman, D. M. Chronic TREM2 activation exacerbates Aβ-associated tau seeding and spreading. J. Exp. Med. 220, e20220654 (2023).
Allen, W. E., Blosser, T. R., Sullivan, Z. A., Dulac, C. & Zhuang, X. Molecular and spatial signatures of mouse brain aging at single-cell resolution. Cell 186, 194–208.e18 (2023).
Zhang, P. et al. Senolytic therapy alleviates Aβ-associated oligodendrocyte progenitor cell senescence and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 719–728 (2019).
Ben-Yehuda, H. et al. Key role of the CCR2-CCL2 axis in disease modification in a mouse model of tauopathy. Mol. Neurodegener. 16, 39 (2021).
Zhao, N. & Bu, G. A TREM2 antibody energizes microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 366–369 (2023).
Rachmian, N. & Krizhanovsky, V. Senescent cells in the brain and where to find them. FEBS J. 290, 1256–1266 (2022).
Xing, Z. et al. Influenza vaccine combined with moderate-dose PD1 blockade reduces amyloid-β accumulation and improves cognition in APP/PS1 mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 91, 128–141 (2021).
Zou, Y. et al. Programmed cell death protein 1 blockade reduces glycogen synthase kinase 3β activity and tau hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 769229 (2021).
Rosenzweig, N. et al. PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade harnesses monocyte-derived macrophages to combat cognitive impairment in a tauopathy mouse model. Nat. Commun. 10, 465 (2019).
Baruch, K. et al. PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade reduces pathology and improves memory in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Med. 22, 135–137 (2016).
Majewska, J. et al. p16-dependent upregulation of PD-L1 impairs immunosurveillance of senescent cells. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.30.524522 (2023).
Wang, T.-W. et al. Blocking PD-L1–PD-1 improves senescence surveillance and ageing phenotypes. Nature 611, 358–364 (2022).
Ulland, T. K. et al. TREM2 maintains microglial metabolic fitness in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 170, 649–663 (2017).
Han, G., Spitzer, M. H., Bendall, S. C., Fantl, W. J. & Nolan, G. P. Metal-isotope-tagged monoclonal antibodies for high-dimensional mass cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2121–2148 (2018).
Bevins, R. A. & Besheer, J. Object recognition in rats and mice: a one-trial non-matching-to-sample learning task to study ‘recognition memory’. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1306–1311 (2006).
Björklund, Å. Single RNA-seq data analysis with R: quality control. Github https://nbisweden.github.io/excelerate-scRNAseq/session-qc/Quality_control.html (2019).
Rachmian, N. & Deitch, D. Trem2_senescent_microglia. Github https://github.com/NoaRachmian/Trem2_senescent_microglia (2024).
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank A. Tsitsou-Kampeli, H. Ben-Yehuda, S. Suzzi, G. Castellani, M. A. Abellanas, L. Roitman, H. Gal, N. Papismadov, Y. Addadi and I. Sher for technical assistance. We also thank all members of the Krizhanovsky laboratory and the Schwartz laboratory for helpful discussions. This study was supported by a grant from the Advanced European Research Council (no. 741744); Israel Science Foundation (ISF) research grant 991/16; ISF–Legacy Heritage Biomedical Science Partnership research grant 1354/15; grants from the Thompson Foundation and the Adelis Foundation (given to M.S.); and by grants from the European Research Council H2020 program (no. 856487), the Weizmann Centers for Research on Positive Neuroscience and Research on Neurodegeneration, the ISF (no. 1626/20), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1506), the Israel Ministry of Health, the Belle S. and Irving E. Meller Center for the Biology of Aging and the Sagol Institute for Longevity Research (given to V.K.). V.K. is an incumbent of the Georg F. Duckwitz Professorial Chair and the Shimon and Golde Picker–Weizmann Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.R., M.S. and V.K. conceptualized the project. N.R., M.S. and V.K. planned the experiments. N.R. designed and performed the CyTOF and flow cytometry experiments and the mouse experiments. S.M. performed and analyzed the NOR task. U.C. and N.R. analyzed flow cytometry. U.C. and N.R. injected mice. H.A. analyzed the snRNA-seq data. N.R. and D.D. analyzed the CyTOF results. H.A., D.D. and N.R. performed data analysis. D.E. and N.R. performed and analyzed RT–PCR. N.R., T.C. and T.M.S. established the CyTOF panel. J.M.P.R. established the flow cytometry panel. S.M. and U.C. contributed to the experiment’s performance and experiment design. L.C. organized the mice colonies and performed genotyping. N.R., M.S. and V.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
V.K. is a co-inventor of patents on senolytics and senolytic approaches and is a consultant for Sentaur Bio. None of these interests influenced the data presented in this manuscript. M.S. is a scientific co-founder of ImmunoBrain Checkpoint, which develops anti-PD-L1 to treat Alzheimerʼs disease. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Neuroscience thanks Rudolph Tanzi, V. Wee Yong and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Association between ApoE and senescence markers.
(a) Pearson’s correlation between the expression of ApoE with TREM2 and with senescence markers, p16, p19 and p21. Each color represents a different experiment from Fig. 1; the median expression was Z-scored within each experimental group to account for batch identity.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Differential protein expression between disease-associated microglia (DAM) and senescent microglia.
Differentially expressed proteins between by senescent microglia compared to disease-associated microglia. Each dot represents one protein. The horizontal line marks the significance threshold p < 0.0016 after Bonferroni correction). The vertical dashed lines represent two fold differences in expression.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Proportion of CD45+ cells following senolytic treatment with ABT-737.
(a-g) 10-11 month-old female mice, vehicle control (WT, vehicle) (n = 4), compared to 10-11-month-old 5xFAD female mice, vehicle control (5xFAD, vehicle) (n = 5), and 10-11-month-old 5xFAD female mice, treated with ABT-737 (5xFAD, ABT) (n = 4). Quantitative analysis showing percentage of (a) resting microglia; (b) activated microglia; (c) disease associated microglia; (d) senescent microglia; (e) border-associated macrophages; (f) monocytes; and (g) CD11b- cells among the CNS CD45+ cells. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Flow cytometry of splenocytes two weeks following ABT-737 treatment.
12.5-13-month-old male mice, vehicle control (WT, vehicle) (n = 7), compared to 12.5-13-month-old 5xFAD male mice, vehicle control (5xFAD, vehicle; n = 7), and 12.5-13-month-old 5xFAD male mice, treated with ABT-737 (5xFAD, ABT; n = 7). (a) Gating strategy. (b-k) Quantitative analysis by flow cytometry; pink and circles represent the WT group, blue and squares represent the 5xFAD vehicle group, and green and triangles represent 5xFAD ABT group (b) Quantitative analysis of B-cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (c) Quantitative analysis of myeloid cells percentage from total CD45+ cells. (d) Quantitative analysis of monocyte percentage from total CD45+ cells. (e) Quantitative analysis of neutrophil percentage from total CD45+ cells. (f) Quantitative analysis of T-cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (g) Quantitative analysis of CD4 + T-cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (h) Quantitative analysis of naïve T-cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (i) Quantitative analysis of T-effector cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (j) Quantitative analysis of T-regulatory cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. (k) Quantitative analysis of CD8 + T-cell percentage from total CD45+ cells. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Open Field test.
Two cohorts of mice were combined for the analysis. First cohort of mice: 10-11 month-old female mice, vehicle control (WT, vehicle) (n = 5), compared to 10-11-month-old 5xFAD female mice, vehicle control (5xFAD, vehicle; n = 4), and 10-11-month-old 5xFAD female mice, treated with ABT-737 (5xFAD, ABT; n = 5). Second cohort of mice: 10-11-month-old male mice, vehicle control (WT, vehicle; n = 5), compared to 10-11-month-old 5xFAD male and female, vehicle control (5xFAD, vehicle) (n = 5), and 10-11 month-old 5xFAD male and female mice, treated with ABT-737 (5xFAD, ABT) (n = 7). One-way ANOVA was used for the analyses. Locomotor activity and anxiety were assessed in an open field test and (a) distance moved; (b) mean velocity; (c) cumulative duration in the center zone; (d) frequency entering the center zone; and (e) latency until center entry were recorded, P(WT vs. AD vehicle) = 0.0100, P(WT vs. AD ABT) = 0.8283, P(AD vehicle vs. AD ABT) = 0.0125. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Mass cytometry gating strategy.
In the analysis workflow, i) we initially selected CD11b as a stable signal over time and applied gating. ii) Subsequently, gating was performed based on event length and Gaussian residual parameters. iii) To eliminate bead-related interference, the 140Ce bead channel was utilized for gating. iv) Next, live single cells were identified using cisplatin in the 195Pt channel, and iridium DNA labeling in the 193Ir channel, and v) the single-cell population was further refined using two iridium channels. vi) Finally, gating was applied to isolate CD45-positive cells.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table
Supplementary Table 1: differentially expressed genes of each cluster.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rachmian, N., Medina, S., Cherqui, U. et al. Identification of senescent, TREM2-expressing microglia in aging and Alzheimer’s disease model mouse brain. Nat Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01620-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01620-8