Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Mechanical integrated circuit materials

Abstract

Recent developments in autonomous engineered matter have introduced the ability for intelligent materials to process environmental stimuli and functionally adapt1,2,3,4. To formulate a foundation for such an engineered living material paradigm, researchers have introduced sensing5,6,7,8,9,10,11 and actuating12,13,14,15,16 functionalities in soft matter. Yet, information processing is the key functional element of autonomous engineered matter that has been recently explored through unconventional techniques with limited computing scalability17,18,19,20. Here we uncover a relation between Boolean mathematics and kinematically reconfigurable electrical circuits to realize all combinational logic operations in soft, conductive mechanical materials. We establish an analytical framework that minimizes the canonical functions of combinational logic by the Quine–McCluskey method, and governs the mechanical design of reconfigurable integrated circuit switching networks in soft matter. The resulting mechanical integrated circuit materials perform higher-level arithmetic, number comparison, and decode binary data to visual representations. We exemplify two methods to automate the design on the basis of canonical Boolean functions and individual gate-switching assemblies. We also increase the computational density of the materials by a monolithic layer-by-layer design approach. As the framework established here leverages mathematics and kinematics for system design, the proposed approach of mechanical integrated circuit materials can be realized on any length scale and in a wide variety of physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Bit abstraction through switching elements and gates.
Fig. 2: Combinational logic design synthesis.
Fig. 3: Two-bit arithmetic operators.
Fig. 4: Demonstration of the sensing, computing and actuating functionalities of a soft mechanical IC material.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

All code is available in the main text or the Supplementary Information and is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kaspar, C., Ravoo, B. J., van der Wiel, W. G., Wegner, S. V. & Pernice, W. H. P. The rise of intelligent matter. Nature 594, 345–355 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McEvoy, M. A. & Correll, N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science 347, 1261689 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wehner, M. et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536, 451–455 (2016).

  4. Pishvar, M. & Harne, R. L. Foundations for soft, smart matter by active mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001384 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, L., Scheiger, J. M. & Levkin, P. A. Design and applications of photoresponsive hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807333 (2019).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, D., Lu, Z., Chester, S. A. & Lee, H. Micro 3D printing of a temperature-responsive hydrogel using projection micro-stereolithography. Sci. Rep. 8, 1963 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sears, N. C., Berrigan, J. D., Buskohl, P. R. & Harne, R. L. Flexible hybrid electronic material systems with programmable strain sensing architectures. Adv. Eng. Mater. 20, 1800499 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Valentine, A. D. et al. Hybrid 3D printing of soft electronics. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703817 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gong, J., Seow, O., Honnet, C., Forman, J. & Mueller, S. MetaSense: integrating sensing capabilities into mechanical metamaterial. In 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1063–1073 (2021).

  10. Barri, K. et al. Multifunctional meta-tribomaterial nanogenerators for energy harvesting and active sensing. Nano Energy 86, 106074 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nick, Z. H., Tabor, C. E. & Harne, R. L. Liquid metal microchannels as digital sensors in mechanical metamaterials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 40, 100871 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Otake, M., Kagami, Y., Inaba, M. & Inoue, H. Motion design of a starfish-shaped gel robot made of electro-active polymer gel. Rob. Autom. Syst. 40, 185–191 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ye, Z., Hou, P. & Chen, Z. 2D maneuverable robotic fish propelled by multiple ionic polymer–metal composite artificial fins. Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 1, 195–208 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, D. et al. Buckling pneumatic linear actuators inspired by muscle. Adv. Mater. Technol. 1, 1600055 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wani, O. M., Zeng, H. & Priimagi, A. A light-driven artificial flytrap. Nat. Commun. 8, 15546 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, H. et al. Soft and smart modular structures actuated by shape memory alloy (SMA) wires as tentacles of soft robots. Smart Mater. Struct. 25, 085026 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yasuda, H. et al. Mechanical computing. Nature 598, 39–48 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pal, A., Restrepo, V., Goswami, D. & Martinez, R. V. Exploiting mechanical instabilities in soft robotics: control, sensing, and actuation. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006939 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, B., Chen, D. & Hayward, R. C. Mechanically gated electrical switches by creasing of patterned metal/elastomer bilayer films. Adv. Mater. 26, 4381–4385 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chae, S. et al. Stretchable thin film mechanical‐strain‐gated switches and logic gate functions based on a soft tunneling barrier. Adv. Mater. 33, 2104769 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasuda, H., Tachi, T., Lee, M. & Yang, J. Origami-based tunable truss structures for non-volatile mechanical memory operation. Nat. Commun. 8, 962 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Treml, B., Gillman, A., Buskohl, P. & Vaia, R. Origami mechanologic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6916–6921 (2018).

  23. Meng, Z. et al. Bistability-based foldable origami mechanical logic gates. Extreme Mech. Lett. 43, 101180 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song, Y. et al. Additively manufacturable micro-mechanical logic gates. Nat. Commun. 10, 882 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zanaty, M., Schneegans, H., Vardi, I. & Henein, S. Reconfigurable logic gates based on programable multistable mechanisms. J. Mech. Robot. 12, 021111 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ion, A., Wall, L., Kovacs, R. & Baudisch, P. Digital mechanical metamaterials. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 977–988 (2017).

  27. Raney, J. R. et al. Stable propagation of mechanical signals in soft media using stored elastic energy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9722–9727 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Preston, D. J. et al. Digital logic for soft devices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7750–7759 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jin, Y. et al. Materials tactile logic via innervated soft thermochromic elastomers. Nat. Commun. 10, 4187 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. El Helou, C., Buskohl, P. R., Tabor, C. E. & Harne, R. L. Digital logic gates in soft, conductive mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 12, 1633 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Shannon, C. E. A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits. Electr. Eng. 57, 713–723 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McCluskey, E. J. Minimization of Boolean functions. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 35, 1417–1444 (1956).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Grima, J. N., Alderson, A. & Evans, K. E. Auxetic behavior from rotating rigid units. Phys. Status Solidi B 242, 561–575 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma, F., Wu, J. H., Huang, M., Fu, G. & Bai, C. Cochlear bionic acoustic metamaterials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 213702 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vuyk, P., Cui, S. & Harne, R. L. Illuminating origins of impact energy dissipation in mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 20, 1700828 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported in part by a US Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) Summer Faculty Fellowship, in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development Award (number 2054970), and in part by funds from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.E.H. and R.L.H. designed the research. C.E.H. and B.G. performed the research. C.E.H., B.G., C.E.T., P.R.B. and R.L.H. analysed the data. C.E.H., B.G., C.E.T., P.R.B. and R.L.H. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan L. Harne.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Soosang Chae and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Full adder digital states.

(a) Logic diagram of the full adder with its corresponding (b) truth table. (c) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the material and conductive network for the full adder operation as determined from the design process. (d) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the 8 possible configuration states with the binary inputs (A B C)2 shown in green and output (QCout QSum)2 in red. Connected networks for each output are bolded and highlighted in green or yellow.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Analysis of unit cell designs.

Three 1-bit unit cell designs with a Buffer gate conductive network are explored to tailor the mechanical uniaxial and shear force for the digital bit input. Schematics of the three unique designs are illustrated here: (a) Design I, (b) Design II and (c) Design III. The designs demonstrate independent bi-state self-contact and reconfigurable mechanical-electrical networks. The contact angle design parameter θcont and the centre shape geometry may be cultivated to design unit cells that require shear-dominated forces and low vertical displacements, such as Design III. The Boolean mathematical framework introduced in this research may be applied to various n-bit material systems that are sensitive to broad force environments.

Extended Data Fig. 3 2-bit adder digital states.

(a) Logic diagram of the 2-bit adder with its corresponding (b) truth table. (c) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the material and conductive network for the 2-bit adder operation as determined from the design process. (d) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the 16 possible configuration states with the binary inputs (A1 B1 A2 B2)2 shown in green and output (QCout QS2 QS1)2 in red. Connected networks for each output are bolded and highlighted in green or yellow.

Extended Data Fig. 4 2-bit subtractor digital states.

(a) Logic diagram of the 2-bit subtractor with its corresponding (b) truth table. (c) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the material and conductive network for the 2-bit subtractor operation as determined from the design process. (d) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the 16 possible configuration states with the binary inputs (A1 B1 A2 B2)2 shown in green and output (QBout QD2 QD1)2 in red. Connected networks for each output are bolded and highlighted in green or yellow.

Extended Data Fig. 5 2-bit multiplier digital states.

(a) Logic diagram of the 2-bit multiplier with its corresponding (b) truth table. (c) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the material and conductive network for the 2-bit multiplier operation as determined from the design process. (d) A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the 16 possible configuration states with the binary inputs (A1 B1 A2 B2)2 shown in green and output (QP4 QP3 QP2 QP1)2 in red. Connected networks for each output are bolded and highlighted in green or yellow.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Analysis of n-bit adder scalability.

We utilize the automated design tool to design 1- to 6- bit adders to understand the material scalability with increasing n-bits in the adder operation. Two plots illustrating the relationship between the quantity of bits in an n-bit adder operation and the quantity of (a) switches and (b) material unit cells for the Standard Sum of Product (SSoP) and the Quine–McCluskey Sum of Product (QMSoP) design methods. The top plots illustrate a log10 scale and the bottom plots illustrate a linear scale for the quantity of switches and unit cells. The QMSoP reduces the material size by 31% in the 2-bit adder and by 92% in the 6-bit adder.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Comparison of material design methods.

Three methods are explored in this research that are capable of combinational logic network programming on soft material substrates. Schematics of the material and conductive network for the 2-bit adder by utilizing (a) the Standard Sum of Product (SSoP), (b) the Quine–McCluskey Sum of Product (QMSoP) and (c) the Substitution Method (SM). Compared to the SSoP, the QMSoP 2-bit adder significantly reduces both the quantity of switches and unit cells to 32 and 44, respectively. The SM further reduces the 2-bit adder to 24 switches and 36 unit cells.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Multilayer integrated circuit material.

A five-layer material system is utilized for the 86-gate combinational logic operation. (a) A schematic of a single layer 4-bit mechanical platform. (b) An experimental image illustrating the five-layer material system in the casing with respective dimensions. Five layers are chosen to distribute the 15 total digital outputs. A schematic (left) and experimental image (right) of the material and conductive network for layer (c) 1, (d) 2, (e) 3, (f) 4 and (g) 5 as determined from the design process. Each layer is only 12 conductive columns wide, which permits more straightforward digital actuation based on the urethane rubber material chosen here. In experiment, 16 column layers are utilized. The outer 2 columns are added without conductive traces on each extremity to improve self-contact at the boundary unit cells.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Embedded layers for computing-dense mechanical integrated circuit material.

(a) A schematic of a 2-bit adder with three stacked layers that contain the QS2, QCout, and QS1 on layers 1, 2 and 3, respectively. All layers are powered by the same Vcc terminal (cyan). (b) Experimental image showing the three layers made with cast urethane rubber substrates and Ag-TPU networks. (c) Image of commercial dual extrusion printer as it simultaneously prints the substrate and conductive network of a 2-bit adder by the layer-by-layer fabrication method. Photos of 2-bit adders as fabricated using the (d) casting and (e) additive manufacturing techniques. (f) Experimental results showing three digital input and output combinations for the cast (top) and additive manufactured (bottom) samples.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This Supplementary Information file contains two sections with Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and additional references. Section 1: Substitution method of network topology formulation; Section 2: Design strategy tutorial: Quine–McCluskey sum of product (QMSoP).

Supplementary Video 1

This video demonstrates an 86-gate combinational logic operation illustrated in Fig. 4. This operation contains four digital inputs, A1, A2, B1 and B2. The 2-bit number B (B2B1)2 is simultaneously added and multiplied with the 2-bit number A (A2A1)2. The binary outputs are decoded to a two seven-segment number display with a, b, c, d, e, f and g independent segments. Furthermore, the magnitudes of the addition and the multiplication results are compared through a 4-bit magnitude comparator operation. Such operation results in three outputs, cm1 (<), cm2 (>) and cm3 (=). Thus, whenever a binary signal output is 1, the corresponding segment or comparator sign is illuminated. The display numbers corresponding to the sum and product are illuminated in red and blue, respectively. The numbers are mechanically input by hand through a combination of uniaxial compression and shear. The material casing ensures that all five layers uniformly collapse and exhibit the same collapse mode. The material is uncompressed partially, or fully between corresponding computations. Only 4 states are illustrated in the video, yet 16 functional configurations exist corresponding to the 16 possible arithmetic operations that may be performed and compared.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Helou, C., Grossmann, B., Tabor, C.E. et al. Mechanical integrated circuit materials. Nature 608, 699–703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05004-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05004-5

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics