Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Do not downplay biodiversity loss

Subjects

The Original Article was published on 26 January 2022

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Mean log annual growth rates as a function of the number of yearly abundance estimates in each time series.

Data availability

Data can be accessed from the Living Planet Index database (www.livingplanetindex.org/).

References

  1. Loreau, M. et al. Do not downplay biodiversity loss. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04179-7 (2022).

  2. Leung, B. et al. Clustered versus catastrophic global vertebrate declines. Nature 588, 267–271 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Antão, L. H. et al. Temperature-related biodiversity change across temperate marine and terrestrial systems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 927–933 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung, B., Greenberg, D. A. & Green, D. M. Trends in mean growth and stability in temperate vertebrate populations. Divers. Distrib. 23, 1372–1380 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daskalova, G. N., Myers-Smith, I. H. & Godlee, J. L. Rare and common vertebrates span a wide spectrum of population trends. Nat. Commun. 11, 4394 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murali, G. et al. Emphasizing declining populations in the Living Planet Report. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04165-z (2022).

  7. Leung, B., et al. Reply to: Emphasizing declining populations in the Living Planet Report. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04166-y (2022).

  8. Dornelas, M., et al. A balance of winners and losers in the Anthropocene. Ecol. Lett. 22, 847–854 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilborn, R. Faith based fisheries. Fisheries 31, 554–555 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery grant to B.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.L. wrote the response. A.L.H. and D.A.G. helped with writing, editing and discussing ideas. B.M. and M.D. discussed ideas and helped with editing. R.F. contributed discussions to the original manuscript2.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Leung.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leung, B., Hargreaves, A.L., Greenberg, D.A. et al. Reply to: Do not downplay biodiversity loss. Nature 601, E29–E31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04180-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04180-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene