Abstract
With high capacity at low cost, Li- and Mn-rich (LMR) layered oxides are a promising class of cathodes for next-generation Li-ion batteries. However, substantial voltage decay during cycling, due to the unstable Li2MnO3 honeycomb structure, is still an obstacle to their practical deployment. Here we report a Co-free LMR Li-ion battery cathode with negligible voltage decay. The material has a composite structure consisting of layered LiTMO2 and various stacked Li2MnO3 components, where transition metal (TM) ions that reside in the Li layers of Li2MnO3 form caps to strengthen the stability of the honeycomb structure. This capped-honeycomb structure is persistent after high-voltage cycling and prevents TM migration and oxygen loss as shown by experimental and computational results. This work demonstrates that the long-standing voltage decay problem in LMRs can be effectively mitigated by internally pinning the honeycomb structure, which opens an avenue to developing next-generation high-energy cathode materials.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data supporting the findings in this study are available within the paper and the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Goodenough, J. B. & Park, K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1167–1176 (2013).
Lu, Z., Beaulieu, L. Y., Donaberger, R. A., Thomas, C. L. & Dahn, J. R. Synthesis structure, and electrochemical behavior of Li[NixLi1/3−2x/3Mn2/3−x/3]O2. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A778–A791 (2002).
Thackeray, M. M., Johnson, C. S., Vaughey, J. T., Li, N. & Hackney, S. A. Advances in manganese-oxide ‘composite’ electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 2257–2267 (2005).
Wen, B. et al. Surface reduction in lithium- and manganese-rich layered cathodes for lithium ion batteries drives voltage decay. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 21941–21954 (2022).
Shunmugasundaram, R., Senthil Arumugam, R. & Dahn, J. R. High capacity Li-rich positive electrode materials with reduced first-cycle irreversible capacity loss. Chem. Mater. 27, 757–767 (2015).
Zheng, J. et al. Li‐ and Mn‐rich cathode materials: challenges to commercialization. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601284 (2017).
Zhang, J. et al. Addressing voltage decay in Li-rich cathodes by broadening the gap between metallic and anionic bands. Nat. Commun. 12, 3071 (2021).
Cai, M. et al. Stalling oxygen evolution in high-voltage cathodes by lanthurization. Nat. Energy 8, 159–168 (2023).
Rinkel, B. L. D., Vivek, J. P., Garcia-Araez, N. & Grey, C. P. Two electrolyte decomposition pathways at nickel-rich cathode surfaces in lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3416–3438 (2022).
Assat, G. & Tarascon, J.-M. Fundamental understanding and practical challenges of anionic redox activity in Li-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 373–386 (2018).
Wu, J. et al. Suppression of voltage-decay in Li2MnO3 cathode via reconstruction of layered-spinel coexisting phases. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 18687–18697 (2020).
Seo, D.-H. et al. The structural and chemical origin of the oxygen redox activity in layered and cation-disordered Li-excess cathode materials. Nat. Chem. 8, 692–697 (2016).
House, R. A. et al. First-cycle voltage hysteresis in Li-rich 3d cathodes associated with molecular O2 trapped in the bulk. Nat. Energy 5, 777–785 (2020).
McCalla, E. et al. Visualization of O–O peroxo-like dimers in high-capacity layered oxides for Li-ion batteries. Science 350, 1516–1521 (2015).
Hong, J. et al. Metal-oxygen decoordination stabilizes anion redox in Li-rich oxides. Nat. Mater. 18, 256–265 (2019).
Xu, J. et al. Elucidating anionic oxygen activity in lithium-rich layered oxides. Nat. Commun. 9, 947 (2018).
Gent, W. E. et al. Coupling between oxygen redox and cation migration explains unusual electrochemistry in lithium-rich layered oxides. Nat. Commun. 8, 2091 (2017).
Liu, T. et al. Origin of structural degradation in Li-rich layered oxide cathode. Nature 606, 305–312 (2022).
Hu, S. et al. Insight of a phase compatible surface coating for long‐durable Li‐rich layered oxide cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901795 (2019).
Kim, S. Y. et al. Inhibiting oxygen release from Li‐rich, Mn‐rich layered oxides at the surface with a solution processable oxygen scavenger polymer. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100552 (2021).
Nayak, P. K. et al. Al doping for mitigating the capacity fading and voltage decay of layered Li and Mn-rich cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502398 (2016).
Liu, W. et al. Countering voltage decay and capacity fading of lithium-rich cathode material at 60 °C by hybrid surface protection layers. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500274 (2015).
Zhu, Z. et al. Gradient Li-rich oxide cathode particles immunized against oxygen release by a molten salt treatment. Nat. Energy 4, 1049–1058 (2019).
Qiu, B. et al. Gas–solid interfacial modification of oxygen activity in layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 7, 12108 (2016).
Eum, D. et al. Voltage decay and redox asymmetry mitigation by reversible cation migration in lithium-rich layered oxide electrodes. Nat. Mater. 19, 419–427 (2020).
Luo, K. et al. One-pot synthesis of lithium-rich cathode material with hierarchical morphology. Nano Lett. 16, 7503–7508 (2016).
Kim, D. et al. Composite ‘layered-layered-spinel’ cathode structures for lithium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, A31–A38 (2013).
Ning, F. et al. Inhibition of oxygen dimerization by local symmetry tuning in Li-rich layered oxides for improved stability. Nat. Commun. 11, 4973 (2020).
Song, J. et al. A high-performance Li–Mn–O Li-rich cathode material with rhombohedral symmetry via intralayer Li/Mn disordering. Adv. Mater. 32, e2000190 (2020).
Li, M. & Lu, J. Cobalt in lithium-ion batteries. Science 367, 979–980 (2020).
Lee, S. & Manthiram, A. Can cobalt be eliminated from lithium-ion batteries? ACS Energy Lett. 7, 3058–3063 (2022).
Zhao, H. et al. Cobalt‐free cathode materials: families and their prospects. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103894 (2022).
Boivin, E. et al. The role of Ni and Co in suppressing O‐loss in Li‐rich layered cathodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2003660 (2020).
Lin, T. et al. Faster activation and slower capacity/voltage fading: a bifunctional urea treatment on lithium‐rich cathode materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909192 (2020).
Hu, E. et al. Evolution of redox couples in Li- and Mn-rich cathode materials and mitigation of voltage fade by reducing oxygen release. Nat. Energy 3, 690–698 (2018).
Dixon, D., Mangold, S., Knapp, M., Ehrenberg, H. & Bhaskar, A. Direct observation of reductive coupling mechanism between oxygen and iron/nickel in cobalt‐free Li‐rich cathode material: an in operando X‐ray absorption spectroscopy study. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100479 (2021).
Kuppan, S., Shukla, A. K., Membreno, D., Nordlund, D. & Chen, G. Revealing anisotropic spinel formation on pristine Li‐ and Mn‐rich layered oxide surface and its impact on cathode performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602010 (2017).
Delmas, C., Fouassier, C. & Hagenmuller, P. Structural classification and properties of the layered oxides. Phys. B+C. 99, 81–85 (1980).
Zuo, Y. et al. A high-capacity O2-type Li-rich cathode material with a single-layer Li2MnO3 superstructure. Adv. Mater. 30, e1707255 (2018).
Paulsen, J. M., Thomas, C. L. & Dahn, J. R. Layered Li–Mn‐oxide with the O2 structure: a cathode material for Li‐ion cells which does not convert to spinel. J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 3560–3565 (1999).
Mohanty, D. et al. Unraveling the voltage-fade mechanism in high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries: origin of the tetrahedral cations for spinel conversion. Chem. Mater. 26, 6272–6280 (2014).
Liu, H. et al. What triggers the voltage hysteresis variation beyond the first cycle in Li-rich 3d layered oxides with reversible cation migration? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 8740–8748 (2021).
Liu, S. et al. Li–Ti cation mixing enhanced structural and performance stability of Li‐rich layered oxide. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901530 (2019).
Ben Yahia, M., Vergnet, J., Saubanère, M. & Doublet, M.-L. Unified picture of anionic redox in Li/Na-ion batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 496–502 (2019).
Ha, M. et al. Al‐doping driven suppression of capacity and voltage fadings in 4d‐element containing Li‐ion‐battery cathode materials: machine learning and density functional theory. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2201497 (2022).
Yin, L. et al. Operando X-ray diffraction studies of the Mg-ion migration mechanisms in spinel cathodes for rechargeable Mg-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 10649–10658 (2021).
Lin, F. et al. Synchrotron X-ray analytical techniques for studying materials electrochemistry in rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 117, 13123–13186 (2017).
Lu, Z. & Dahn, J. R. Understanding the anomalous capacity of Li/Li[NixLi(1/3−2x/3)Mn(2/3−x/3)]O2 cells using in situ X-ray diffraction and electrochemical studies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A815–A822 (2002).
Castel, E., Berg, E. J., El Kazzi, M., Novák, P. & Villevieille, C. Differential electrochemical mass spectrometry study of the interface of xLi2MnO3·(1 − x)LiMO2 (M = Ni, Co, and Mn) material as a positive electrode in Li-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 26, 5051–5057 (2014).
Reed, J. & Ceder, G. Role of electronic structure in the susceptibility of metastable transition-metal oxide structures to transformation. Chem. Rev. 104, 4513–4534 (2004).
Liu, H. et al. A radially accessible tubular in situ X-ray cell for spatially resolved operando scattering and spectroscopic studies of electrochemical energy storage devices. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 1665–1673 (2016).
Hammersley, A. FIT2D: a multi-purpose data reduction, analysis and visualization program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49, 646–652 (2016).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
Dudarev, S., Botton, G., Savrasov, S., Humphreys, C. & Sutton, A. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
Wang, L., Maxisch, T. & Ceder, G. Oxidation energies of transition metal oxides within the GGA+U framework. Phys. Rev. B 73, 195107 (2006).
Jain, A. et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295–2310 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support by National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFA0406203), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Project No. JCYJ20220818101016034, SGDX2019081623240948), the General Research Fund (GRF) scheme (CityU 11220322), CityU 9610533 and the Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong. We thank X. Zhong and N. Wang for providing consultation on the STEM results. Y.X. and C.M.W. acknowledge support from the Toyota Research Institute through the Accelerated Materials Design and Discovery programme and the National Science Foundation through the MRSEC programme (NSF-DMR 1720139) at the Materials Research Center. We acknowledge the computing resources provided by (1) Quest High-Performance Computing Facility at Northwestern University, which is jointly supported by the Office of the Provost, the Office for Research and Northwestern University Information Technology and (2) Bridges-2 at Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center through allocations dmr160027p and mat220007p from the Advanced Cyber-infrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) programme, which is supported by National Science Foundation grants 2138259, 2138286, 2138307, 2137603 and 2138296. Y.X. was also supported by Portland State University Lab Setup Fund. This research also used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.L. and Y.R. conceived the ideas and designed all the experiments. Q.L., Y.R., W.L. and C.M.W. supervised the project. D.L. and Z.Y. performed the materials synthesis and the ex situ characterizations, including the XRD, ICP and SEM experiments. Y.Q. and W.L. performed the materials evaluation and electrochemical characterization. Y.H., T.Y., Y.T. and S.L. contributed to discussions and interpretation of the electrochemical data. Q.Z., L.G., Y.P. and J.Z. acquired the STEM and HAADF images. H.Z., Y.R., T.L. and K.M.W. carried out the in situ synchrotron characterizations. H.Z., Z.Y. and Y.R. analysed and interpreted the synchrotron XRD data. D.L. performed the in situ DEMS experiments. Y.X. and C.W. performed the first-principles calculations. H.Z., D.L., Q.L., Y.R., Y.X. and Z.Y. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
For Q.L., D.L., H.Z., Y.R. and Z.Y., a US provisional patent application, patent number 63/377, 386, has been filed for this work. The patent is related to the specific material reported in this work and submitted by City University of Hong Kong. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Energy thanks Richard Schmuch, Ethan Self and Aditya Singh for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–13 and Table 1.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, D., Zhu, H., Xia, Y. et al. A Li-rich layered oxide cathode with negligible voltage decay. Nat Energy 8, 1078–1087 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01289-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01289-6
This article is cited by
-
Highly reversible transition metal migration in superstructure-free Li-rich oxide boosting voltage stability and redox symmetry
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Structurally robust lithium-rich layered oxides for high-energy and long-lasting cathodes
Nature Communications (2024)