Abstract
The Paris Agreement1 aims to ‘pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.’ However, it has been suggested that temperature targets alone are insufficient to limit the risks associated with anthropogenic emissions2,3. Here, using an ensemble of model simulations, we show that atmospheric CO2 increase—an even more predictable consequence of emissions than global temperature increase—has a significant direct impact on Northern Hemisphere summer temperature, heat stress, and tropical precipitation extremes. Hence in an iterative climate mitigation regime aiming solely for a specific temperature goal, an unexpectedly low climate response may have corresponding ‘dangerous’ changes in extreme events. The direct impact of higher CO2 concentrations on climate extremes therefore substantially reduces the upper bound of the carbon budget, and highlights the need to explicitly limit atmospheric CO2 concentration when formulating allowable emissions. Thus, complementing global mean temperature goals with explicit limits on atmospheric CO2 concentrations in future climate policy would limit the adverse effects of high-impact weather extremes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).
Seneviratne, S. I., Donat, M. G., Pitman, A. J., Knutti, R. & Wilby, R. L. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 529, 477–483 (2016).
Steinacher, M., Joos, F. & Stocker, T. F. Allowable carbon emissions lowered by multiple climate targets. Nature 499, 197–201 (2013).
Fuglestvedt, J. et al. Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20160445 (2018).
Mitchell, D. et al. Realizing the impacts of a 1.5 °C warmer world. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 735–737 (2016).
Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835 (2016).
Folland, C. K. et al. Influences of anthropogenic and oceanic forcing on recent climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 353–356 (1998).
Sexton, D. M. H., Grubb, H., Shine, K. P. & Folland, C. K. Design and analysis of climate model experiments for the efficient estimation of anthropogenic signals. J. Clim. 16, 1320–1336 (2003).
Bony, S. et al. Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation. Nat. Geosci. 6, 447–451 (2013).
Dong, B. & Sutton, R. Dominant role of greenhouse-gas forcing in the recovery of Sahel rainfall. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 757–760 (2015).
Richardson, T. B., Forster, P. M., Andrews, T. & Parker, D. J. Understanding the rapid precipitation response to CO2 and aerosol forcing on a regional scale. J. Clim. 29, 583–594 (2016).
Kamae, Y., Shiogama, H., Watanabe, M. & Kimoto, M. Attributing the increase in Northern Hemisphere hot summers since the late 20th century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 5192–5199 (2014).
Seneviratne, S. I., Donat, M. G., Mueller, B. & Alexander, L. V. No pause in the increase of hot temperature extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 161–163 (2014).
Dong, B. et al. Abrupt summer warming and changes in temperature extremes over Northeast Asia since the mid-1990s: Drivers and physical processes. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1005–1023 (2016).
Millar, R. J. et al. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 741–747 (2017).
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
Sherwood, S. C. & Huber, M. An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9552–9555 (2010).
Willett, K. M. & Sherwood, S. Exceedance of heat index thresholds for 15 regions under a warming climate using the wet-bulb globe temperature. Int. J. Climatol. 32, 161–177 (2012).
Russo, S., Sillmann, J. & Sterl, A. Humid heat waves at different warming levels. Sci. Rep. 7, 7477 (2017).
Im, E.-S., Pal, J. S. & Eltahir, E. A. B. Deadly heat waves projected in the densely populated agricultural regions of South Asia. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603322 (2017).
Takakura, J. et al. Cost of preventing workplace heat-related illness through worker breaks and the benefit of climate-change mitigation. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 064010 (2017).
Murari, K. K. et al. Intensification of future severe heat waves in India and their effect on heat stress and mortality. Reg. Environ. Change 15, 569–579 (2015).
Pendergrass, A. G., Lehner, F., Sanderson, B. M. & Xu, Y. Does extreme precipitation intensity depend on the emissions scenario? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8767–8774 (2015).
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Tebaldi, C. & Arblaster, J. M. Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations. Clim. Change 122, 459–471 (2014).
Curry, C. L. et al. A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 3900–3923 (2014).
Watanabe, M. et al. Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 23, 6312–6335 (2010).
Gent, P. R. et al. The Community Climate System Model Version 4. J. Clim. 24, 4973–4991 (2011).
Pope, V. D., Gallani, M. L., Rowntree, P. R. & Stratton, R. A. The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3. Clim. Dynam. 16, 123–146 (2000).
Gordon, C. et al. The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim. Dynam. 16, 147–168 (2000).
Guillod, B. P. et al. weather@home 2: validation of an improved global-regional climate modelling system. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1849–1872 (2017).
Allen, M. Do-it-yourself climate prediction. Nature 401, 642–642 (1999).
Mitchell, D. et al. Half a degree Additional warming, Projections, Prognosis and Impacts (HAPPI): Background and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 10, 571–583 (2017).
Massey, N. et al. weather@home-development and validation of a very large ensemble modelling system for probabilistic event attribution. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141, 1528–1545 (2015).
Vogel, M. M. et al. Regional amplification of projected changes in extreme temperatures strongly controlled by soil moisture–temperature feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1511–1519 (2017).
Palter, J. B., Frölicher, T. L., Paynter, D. & John, J. G. Climate, ocean circulation, and sea level changes under stabilization and overshoot pathways to 1.5 K warming. Earth Syst. Dynam. Discus s. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2017-105 (2017).
Sanderson, B. M. et al. Community climate simulations to assess avoided impacts in 1.5 and 2C futures. Earth Syst. Dynam 8, 827–847 (2017).
Frich, P. et al. Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim. Res. 19, 193–212 (2002).
Meehl, G. A. & Tebaldi, C. More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305, 994–997 (2004).
Alexander, L. V. et al. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D05109 (2006).
Fischer, E. M. & Knutti, R. Robust projections of combined humidity and temperature extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 126–130 (2012).
Sonntag, D. Important new values of the physical constants of 1986, vapor pressure formulations based on ITS-90 and psychrometer formulae. Meteorol. Z. 70, 340–344 (1990).
Acknowledgements
H.S.B. is supported by Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/L002612/1. R.J.M. was supported by Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/P014844/1. D.M. is supported by a NERC independent fellowship. H.S. was supported by the Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU program) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan and ERTDF 2–1702 of Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency, Japan. The authors thank the HAPPI project team and the modelling centres who contributed simulations. This research used science gateway resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors are grateful to F. Otto for making available results from event attribution experiments that provided the original motivation for this study. We would like to thank our colleagues at the Oxford eResearch Centre: A. Bowery, M. Rashid, P. Uhe and D. Wallom for their technical expertise. We would like to thank the Met Office Hadley Centre PRECIS team for their technical and scientific support for the development and application of weather@Home. Finally, we would like to thank all of the volunteers who have donated their computing time to climateprediction.net and weather@home.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.R.A. conceived the experiment. H.S.B. and B.P.G. set up the HadAM3P simulations, S.S ran the HadAM3P simulations, H.S. ran the MIROC5 simulations and U.B. ran the CAM4 simulations. H.S.B. performed the analysis with input from D.J.K., R.J.M., B.P.G., T.W., D.M. and M.R.A. R.J.M. contributed to one of the figures. H.S.B. wrote the paper with comments from all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1–15, Supplementary Table 1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, H.S., Millar, R.J., Karoly, D.J. et al. Higher CO2 concentrations increase extreme event risk in a 1.5 °C world. Nature Clim Change 8, 604–608 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0190-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0190-1
This article is cited by
-
Spatial-temporal evolution of carbon emissions and spatial-temporal heterogeneity of influencing factors in the Bohai Rim Region, China
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2024)
-
Biochar ageing effects on soil respiration, biochar wettability and gaseous CO2 adsorption
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (2024)
-
A multi-modal machine learning approach to detect extreme rainfall events in Sicily
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Importance of humidity for characterization and communication of dangerous heatwave conditions
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2023)
-
Gross Primary Production, Ecosystem Respiration, and Net Ecosystem Production in a Southeastern South American Salt Marsh
Estuaries and Coasts (2023)