Abstract
Carbon influences the evolution and functioning of plants and their roots. Previous work examining a small number of commonly measured root traits has revealed a global multidimensionality of the resource economics traits in fine roots considering carbon as primary currency but without considering the diversity of carbon-related traits. To address this knowledge gap, we use data from 66 tree species from a tropical forest to illustrate that root economics space co-varies with a novel molecular-level traits space based on nuclear magnetic resonance. Thinner fine roots exhibit higher proportions of carbohydrates and lower diversity of molecular carbon than thicker roots. Mass-denser fine roots have more lignin and aromatic carbon compounds but less bioactive carbon compounds than lighter roots. Thus, the transition from thin to thick fine roots implies a shift in the root carbon economy from ‘do-it-yourself’ soil exploration to collaboration with mycorrhizal fungi, while the shift from light to dense fine roots emphasizes a shift from acquisitive to conservative root strategy. We reveal a previously undocumented role of molecular-level carbon traits that potentially undergird the multidimensional root economics space. This finding offers new molecular insight into the diversity of root form and function, which is fundamental to our understanding of plant evolution, species coexistence and adaptations to heterogeneous environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within this paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw data in this study are available via Figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24218970 (ref. 73). Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.W. (wangjj@sustech.edu.cn). Literature data were extracted from Fine-Root Ecology Database 3.0 (https://roots.ornl.gov/)62.
Code availability
The code utilized for this study is publicly available and is hosted in figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24218970 (ref. 73).
References
Carmona, C. P. et al. Fine-root traits in the global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 597, 683–687 (2021).
Bergmann, J. et al. The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba3756 (2020).
Diaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2016).
Weigelt, A. et al. An integrated framework of plant form and function: the belowground perspective. New Phytol. 232, 42–59 (2021).
Reich, P. B. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102, 275–301 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. The worldwide allometric relationship in anatomical structures for plant roots. Plant Divers. 45, 621–629 (2023).
Suseela, V. & Tharayil, N. Decoupling the direct and indirect effects of climate on plant litter decomposition: accounting for stress-induced modifications in plant chemistry. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1428–1451 (2018).
Weng, J. K., Lynch, J. H., Matos, J. O. & Dudareva, N. Adaptive mechanisms of plant specialized metabolism connecting chemistry to function. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 1037–1045 (2021).
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).
McCormack, M. L. et al. Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol. 207, 505–518 (2015).
Kong, D. et al. Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species. New Phytol. 203, 863–872 (2014).
Wang, J. J., Tharayil, N., Chow, A. T., Suseela, V. & Zeng, H. Phenolic profile within the fine-root branching orders of an evergreen species highlights a disconnect in root tissue quality predicted by elemental- and molecular-level carbon composition. New Phytol. 206, 1261–1273 (2015).
Mueller, K. E., Polissar, P. J., Oleksyn, J. & Freeman, K. H. Differentiating temperate tree species and their organs using lipid biomarkers in leaves, roots and soil. Org. Geochem. 52, 130–141 (2012).
Xia, M., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Suseela, V., Blackwood, C. B. & Tharayil, N. Coordination between compound-specific chemistry and morphology in plant roots aligns with ancestral mycorrhizal association in woody angiosperms. New Phytol. 232, 1259–1271 (2021).
Sun, T. et al. Contrasting dynamics and trait controls in first-order root compared with leaf litter decomposition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10392–10397 (2018).
Suseela, V., Tharayil, N., Orr, G. & Hu, D. Chemical plasticity in the fine root construct of Quercus spp. varies with root order and drought. New Phytol. 228, 1835–1851 (2020).
Poirier, V., Roumet, C. & Munson, A. D. The root of the matter: linking root traits and soil organic matter stabilization processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 120, 246–259 (2018).
Du, F. & Jiao, Y. L. Mechanical control of plant morphogenesis: concepts and progress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 57, 16–23 (2020).
Hofhuis, H. et al. Morphomechanical innovation drives explosive seed dispersal. Cell 166, 222–233 (2016).
Coen, E. & Cosgrove, D. J. The mechanics of plant morphogenesis. Science 379, eade8055 (2023).
Zhang, B., Gao, Y., Zhang, L. & Zhou, Y. The plant cell wall: biosynthesis, construction, and functions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 63, 251–272 (2021).
Burton, R. A., Gidley, M. J. & Fincher, G. B. Heterogeneity in the chemistry, structure and function of plant cell walls. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 724–732 (2010).
Anderson, C. T. & Kieber, J. J. Dynamic construction, perception, and remodeling of plant cell walls. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 39–69 (2020).
Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I. M. & Murphy, A. Plant Physiology and Development (Sinauer, 2015).
Weng, J.-K., Philippe, R. N. & Noel, J. P. The rise of chemodiversity in plants. Science 336, 1667–1670 (2012).
Lux, A., Luxová, M., Abe, J. & Morita, S. Root cortex: structural and functional variability and responses to environmental stress. Root Res. 13, 117–131 (2004).
Buchanan, B. B., Gruissem, W. & Jones, R. L. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants 2nd edn (Wiley Blackwell, 2015).
Xia, M., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., Suseela, V., Blackwood, C. B. & Tharayil, N. Characterizing natural variability of lignin abundance and composition in fine roots across temperate trees: a comparison of analytical methods. New Phytol. 236, 2358–2373 (2022).
Kögel-Knabner, I. 13C and 15N NMR spectroscopy as a tool in soil organic matter studies. Geoderma 80, 243–270 (1997).
Hall, S. J., Ye, C. L., Weintraub, S. R. & Hockaday, W. C. Molecular trade-offs in soil organic carbon composition at continental scale. Nat. Geosci. 13, 687–692 (2020).
Roumet, C. et al. Root structure–function relationships in 74 species: evidence of a root economics spectrum related to carbon economy. New Phytol. 210, 815–826 (2016).
Ma, Z. et al. Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits. Nature 555, 94–97 (2018).
Reich, P. B. et al. Scaling of respiration to nitrogen in leaves, stems and roots of higher land plants. Ecol. Lett. 11, 793–801 (2008).
Hogan, J. A. et al. Functional variability in specific root respiration translates to autotrophic differences in soil respiration in a temperate deciduous forest. Geoderma 432, 116414 (2023).
Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Gong, Z. & Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 104–119 (2022).
Kelly-Bellow, R. et al. Brassinosteroid coordinates cell layer interactions in plants via cell wall and tissue mechanics. Science 380, 1275–1281 (2023).
Genre, A., Lanfranco, L., Perotto, S. & Bonfante, P. Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 649–660 (2020).
Miyauchi, S. et al. Large-scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits. Nat. Commun. 11, 5125 (2020).
Jiang, Y. et al. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Science 356, 1172–1175 (2017).
Banasiak, J., Jamruszka, T., Murray, J. D. & Jasinski, M. A roadmap of plant membrane transporters in arbuscular mycorrhizal and legume–rhizobium symbioses. Plant Physiol. 187, 2071–2091 (2021).
Assefa, D., Godbold, D. L., Belay, B., Abiyu, A. & Rewald, B. Fine root morphology, biochemistry and litter quality indices of fast- and slow-growing woody species in Ethiopian highland forest. Ecosystems 21, 482–494 (2018).
Zhao, Q. Lignification: flexibility, biosynthesis and regulation. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 713–721 (2016).
Mao, Z. et al. Mechanical traits of fine roots as a function of topology and anatomy. Ann. Bot. 122, 1103–1116 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Molecular insights into the complex mechanics of plant epidermal cell walls. Science 372, 706–711 (2021).
Chang, H. et al. Investigating lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase-assisted wood cell wall degradation with microsensors. Nat. Commun. 13, 6258 (2022).
Rich, M. K., Schorderet, M. & Reinhardt, D. The role of the cell wall compartment in mutualistic symbioses of plants. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 238 (2014).
Gow, N. A. R., Latge, J. P. & Munro, C. A. The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis, and function. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.funk-0035-2016 (2017).
Kang, X. et al. Molecular architecture of fungal cell walls revealed by solid-state NMR. Nat. Commun. 9, 2747 (2018).
Yoshida, M., Murai, T. & Moriya, S. 13C NMR spectra of plant pathogenic fungi. Agric. Biol. Chem. 48, 909–914 (1984).
Kalyuzhny, M., Lake, J. K., Wright, S. J. & Ostling, A. M. Pervasive within-species spatial repulsion among adult tropical trees. Science 381, 563–568 (2023).
Hogan, J. A. et al. Root-associated fungal communities are influenced more by soils than by plant-host root traits in a Chinese tropical forest. New Phytol. 238, 1849–1864 (2023).
Withington, J. M., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J. & Eissenstat, D. M. Comparisons of structure and life span in roots and leaves among temperate trees. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 381–397 (2006).
Zhang, Y. et al. The origin of bi-dimensionality in plant root traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 78–88 (2024).
Su, Y. et al. The evolutionary innovation of root suberin lamellae contributed to the rise of seed plants. Nat Plants 9, 1968–1977 (2023).
Walker, T. W. N. et al. Leaf metabolic traits reveal hidden dimensions of plant form and function. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi4029 (2023).
He, H. et al. Reference carbon cycle dataset for typical Chinese forests via colocated observations and data assimilation. Sci. Data 8, 42 (2021).
Flora of China Editorial Committee. Flora of China (Science Press, 2004).
Guo, D. et al. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytol. 180, 673–683 (2008).
Nelson, P. N. & Baldock, J. A. Estimating the molecular composition of a diverse range of natural organic materials from solid-state 13C NMR and elemental analyses. Biogeochemistry 72, 1–34 (2005).
Meier, C. L. & Bowman, W. D. Links between plant litter chemistry, species diversity, and below-ground ecosystem function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19780–19785 (2008).
Van Soest, P. J. Use of detergents in analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for determination of fiber and lignin. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 46, 829–835 (1963).
Iversen, C. M. et al. A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. New Phytol. 215, 15–26 (2017).
Birouste, M., Zamora-Ledezma, E., Bossard, C., Perez-Ramos, I. M. & Roumet, C. Measurement of fine root tissue density: a comparison of three methods reveals the potential of root dry matter content. Plant Soil 374, 299–313 (2014).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V.PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).
Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
Harrell, F. E. Hmisc: A package of miscellaneous R functions. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/package=Hmisc (2014).
Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/package=factoextra (2020).
Chacón, J. E. & Duong, T. Multivariate Kernel Smoothing and its Applications (CRC Press, 2018).
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community ecology package. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan (2022).
Pinheiro, J. et al. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. CRAN https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme (2023).
Revell, L. J. Size-correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63, 3258–3268 (2009).
Wang, M. K. Data to support: Molecular-level carbon traits underlie the multi-dimensional fine root economics space. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24218970 (2024).
Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42122054, 42192513, 42321004) to J.W.; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171746, 31670550) to D.K.; the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021B1515020082), Key Platform and Scientific Research Projects of Guangdong Provincial Education Department (2020KCXTD006), and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control (2023B1212060002) to J.W.; the Leading Talents of Basic Research in Henan Province to D.K.; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for support via the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Integrative Molecular Biogeochemistry to M.J.S.; a Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) grant (2015-04214) to P.K.; the National Science Foundation: Biological Integration Institutes Grant (NSF-DBI-2021898) and Long Term Ecological Research Grant (NSF-DEB-1831944) to P.B.R.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.W., D.K. and J.W. conceptualized the project. M.W., D.K., J.W., X.M., Y.W. and Q.Y. developed the methodology. D.K., J.W., M.J.S., P.K. and P.B.R. acquired funding. D.K. and J.W. administered the project. M.W., D.K. and J.W. wrote the original draft. M.W., D.K., P.K., O.J.V.-B., M.J.S., H.Z., P.B.R., J.B., N.T. and J.W. reviewed and edited the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Plants thanks J. Aaron Hogan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships for 66 tree species spanning three major angiosperm lineages (40 rosids in blue, 7 asterids in red, and 19 magnoliids in green).
The phylogenetic relationships among plant species were extracted from a molecular phylogenic tree described in Zanne et al.74.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Matrix of Pearson’s correlation coefficients among 13 root traits for 66 tropical tree species.
The correlation matrix is arranged in the hierarchical clustering order. A bigger circle denotes a stronger correlation. Significance level of correlations is indicated; ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05. Significance was tested using a two-sided t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Simulation analyses for coordination between the two-dimensional root functional trait spaces and the molecular-level root carbon traits.
Observed correlations (vertical lines) relative to the distribution when scores were randomly simulated (a) between PC1 scores of 13C-NMR-based carbon traits in the first principal component (including O-aromatic, aromatic, O2-alkyl, carbonyl and carboxyl, N-alkyl/methoxy, and alkyl C) and PC1 scores of root economics traits in the first principal component (including root tissue density and root nitrogen concentration); (b) between PC2 scores of 13C-NMR-based carbon traits in the second principal component (including O-alkyl and H’RSC) and PC2 scores of root economics traits in the second principal component (including root diameter and specific root length). Significance was tested using a two-sided permutation test.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Coordination between the two-dimensional root functional trait planes and the molecular-level root carbon traits based on phylogenetic-informed PCAs (pPCAs).
(a) The two-dimensional root economic traits space. (b) Root carbon traits space, including total root carbon and molecular-level carbon traits. (c) Integrating both commonly-measured root functional traits and molecular-level carbon traits in the two-dimensional root functional trait space. The color gradient indicates species occurrence probability in the trait space defined by PC1 and PC2, with red indicating high occurrence and white indicating low occurrence. Contour lines indicate 0.50 and 0.90 quantiles. The commonly-measured root functional traits are root diameter, specific root length, root tissue density, and root nitrogen concentration. The carbon traits include total root carbon concentration, and 8 molecular-level carbon traits (alkyl, N-alkyl/methoxy, O-alkyl, di-O-alkyl, aromatic, O-aromatic, carbonyl/carboxyl, and structural carbon trait diversity (H′RSC)).
Extended Data Fig. 5 Simulation analyses for coordination between the two-dimensional root functional trait spaces and the molecular-level root carbon traits after controlling for phylogeny.
Observed correlations (vertical lines) relative to the distribution when scores were randomly simulated (a) between PC1 scores of 13C-NMR-based carbon traits (including O-aromatic, aromatic, O2-alkyl, carbonyl and carboxyl, N-alkyl/methoxy, and alkyl C) and PC1 scores of root economics traits (including root tissue density and root nitrogen concentration) after controlling for phylogeny, and (b) between PC2 scores of 13C-NMR-based carbon traits in the second principal component (including O-alkyl and H’RSC) and PC2 scores of root economics traits (including root diameter and specific root length) after controlling for phylogeny. Significance was tested using a two-sided permutation test.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Different species in the two-dimensional root trait space.
Ordination of 66 tree species from three major clades, Asterids (in red), Magnolidds (in green) and Rosids (in blue), in the two-dimensional root trait space based on (a) principal component analysis and (b) phylogenetically-informed principal component analyses.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Text 1 and Tables 1–5.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Kong, D., Mo, X. et al. Molecular-level carbon traits underlie the multidimensional fine root economics space. Nat. Plants (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01700-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01700-4