Abstract
Carbon nanomaterials are expected to be bright and efficient emitters, but structural disorder, intermolecular interactions and the intrinsic presence of dark states suppress their photoluminescence. Here, we study synthetically-made graphene nanoribbons with atomically precise edges and which are designed to suppress intermolecular interactions to demonstrate strong photoluminescence in both solutions and thin films. The resulting high spectral resolution reveals strong vibron-electron coupling from the radial-breathing-like mode of the ribbons. In addition, their cove-edge structure produces inter-valley mixing, which brightens conventionally-dark states to generate hitherto-unrecognised twilight states as predicted by theory. The coupling of these states to the nanoribbon phonon modes affects absorption and emission differently, suggesting a complex interaction with both Herzberg–Teller and Franck– Condon coupling present. Detailed understanding of the fundamental electronic processes governing the optical response will help the tailored chemical design of nanocarbon optical devices, via gap tuning and side-chain functionalisation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Most semiconducting carbon nano-structures have direct band gaps and extreme quantum confinement, so they would be expected to yield superb photoluminescence (PL) quantum efficiencies (PLQEs) from their excitons which have large binding energies1,2,3. Alas, non-radiative dark states, disorder, and interactions among the carbon nano-structures all lead to substantial PL quenching4,5,6,7, limiting their potential for applications in bio-imaging, solar energy conversion, in opto-electronics and in display devices, as well as in quantum technologies for single-photon sources, up-conversion, and sensing2,3,8,9. The most appealing systems, those with large exciton-diffusion coherent lengths, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), are actually those most affected. CNTs need de-bundling, but covalent functionalisation breaks the π-conjugation, and non-covalent surfactants are randomly arranged around the CNT surface, so both mechanisms introduce disorder and severely disrupt electronic properties, limiting the PLQE7,10,11.
Moreover, the presence of degenerate valley states introduces a fundamental limitation by producing dark excitons in CNTs and graphene. Dark excitons occur in carbon nanomaterials because momentum conservation allows PL only from states that have zero net angular momentum. In semiconducting CNTs, the multiple K-points of the graphene Brillouin zone lead to the formation of a dark valley doublet state and two coupled singlets, only one of which is bright (Fig. 1a). Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) with zigzag edges are largely equivalent to armchair CNTs: their edges generate a bandgap with the typical bright and dark states12,13.
Here we show, when the edge structure of the molecular GNR is engineered so as to introduce a periodic modulation of the edge states as in cove-edged GNRs (Fig. 1a), important changes occur to the optical properties. We demonstrate that this causes brightening of the photoluminescence and show how it is linked to electron-phonon coupling.
Results and discussion
Edge engineering and twilight states in cove-GNR
With a threefold edge symmetry, zone-folding of the dark states into the Γ-point zone centre allows all of the previously-dark excitons to mix and become much more emissive (Fig. 1a), increasing the theoretical limit of the PLQE fourfold. To distinguish them from conventional bright states, we dub these new long-lived emissive states that arise from previously-dark ones as twilight states.The projection of the wave-function of several different carbon nanostructures Ψn,k onto the graphene wave-function \({\Psi }_{n,k}^{gra}\), called \(\zeta=\parallel \langle {\Psi }_{n,k}^{gra}| {\Psi }_{n,k}\rangle \parallel\) offers a quantitative insight into the nature of these new states (Supplementary Text 2). A plot of ζ for each wave-vector k and band n shows that armchair CNT and zigzag GNR states project almost perfectly onto the original graphene ones, and thus form the usual bright and dark excitons, while valleys become very strongly mixed in cove-edged GNRs (Fig. 1a). Now, not all states can be projected onto combinations of graphene ones, and k = 0 relaxation to the ground state by photon emission is always allowed (Fig. 1a). The projected density of states for these chemically-feasible GNRs shows a low-energy spectrum dominated by the GNR backbone (Fig. 1b). The absorption no longer belongs to well-defined interband transitions, but to groups of closely-lying transitions near the Γ point14. In particular, the energies of c1 ← v2, c2 ← v1 electronic transitions are close, and can only be labelled by their dominant contribution14.
Enhanced luminescence and solubility from large side groups
Even so, GNRs remain plagued by the other issues that affect CNTs, and, to date, spectra of GNRs in solution have remained broad and featureless15, an indication of inter-ribbon exciton transfer or edge and width disorder16. Finer spectral features are available only in conditions incompatible with applications, such as single ribbons produced by surface synthesis under high-vacuum13.
We overcome these issues by using cove-edged GNRs functionalised with bulky groups, here cycloadducts from the Diels–Alder reaction of anthracene with N-n-octadecylmaleimide. The GNRs still show a length dispersion, but this has little effect on the optical response, as the width-length aspect ratio is large17 and contrary to carbon nanotubes, all ribbons have the same width. We focus on suppressing the electronic interactions among ribbons arising from aggregation. The two possible solubilising groups are covalently attached to the edges with a grafting ratio of 77%17 and spaced entirely regularly at the GNR edges (Fig. 2a), thus minimizing disorder18.
The radius of the bulky groups is approximately 0.5 nm, much larger than the interlayer spacing of graphite, and so they suppress π-π-stacking interactions among GNRs which are thus debundled. These side groups may still lead to some weak ribbon-ribbon interactions, but the suppression of the stacking interaction effectively isolates the electronic states of the ribbons, creating a dramatic effect on the optical response (Fig. 2b). The resulting samples are remarkable: they display exceptional solubility in organic solvents, such as toluene, tetrahydrofuran, and chloroform, remain stable for at least 16 months without precipitation, and thin film samples with identical optical behaviour can be produced by inclusion inside transparent polymer matrices, see materials and methods. The improvements in the optical response are striking: the PL emission is exceptionally bright, with well-defined features (Fig. 2d). By contrast, in non-debundled samples of cove-edged GNRs functionalised with the usual dodecyl groups (Supplementary Fig. 1), which are much less effective at separating the GNRs, we only see broad and featureless photoluminescence (PL) peaks, similar to previous literature16 (Supplementary Fig. 2) with around 3 orders of magnitude lower peak intensities (Fig. 2b).
Phonon modes revealed by Raman scattering
Raman scattering reveals the phonon modes of the new debundled cove-edged GNRs. The radial-breathing-like-mode (RBLM) (31.6 meV) becomes the dominant Raman feature, with a weaker overtone at twice the energy and two weaker peaks at 15 and 20 meV, likely associated with out-of-plane and longitudinal acoustic modes19,20, also visible (Fig. 2c). A lateral zone-folding model, insensitive to the edge structure20,21, yields a RBLM energy \({E}_{RBLM}=\hslash {\omega }_{R}=\frac{399.5{\mathring{A}}\,{{\mbox{meV}}}\,}{{w}_{GNR}}=32\) meV, which matches observations. Local density approximation calculations provide the vibrational symmetries and reproduce quantitatively the vibrational response, with the calculated RBLM energy, 32.2 meV, matching the main Raman peak (Fig. 2c). It is important to note that the symmetry of the RBLM produces a modulation of the GNR width, with large displacements at the edges, and is thus likely to couple strongly to electronic modes. The higher energy D (166 meV) and G (200 meV) Raman modes22 are as expected, but their higher order modes are hidden by the much brighter PL and only emerge at low-T due to the narrowing PL emission. By contrast, the higher-order D and G modes can be easily seen in the bundled GNRs above the very weak PL (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Low temperature PL and electron-phonon coupling
The high resolution of the optical response obtained allows a complete unravelling of the mechanisms at play and indeed reveals the fundamental importance of the interplay of electronic and vibrational states. The absorption spectrum of the GNRs consists of three wide peaks at 2.29 eV, 2.49 eV and 2.63 eV plus a narrower feature at 2.09 eV (Fig. 2d). The overall PLQE for the de-bundled GNRs reaches a value of 6.4 ± 0.2% at room temperature (Table S1), with a gradual enhancement of the emission on lowering the temperature T (Fig. 3e), so that the total PL intensity increases by 20%, leading to a remarkably high overall 8 ± 0.5% PLQE already beyond the theoretical limit of 6% for CNTs and conventional GNRs12.
The 2.09 eV feature is present in both absorption and emission at the same energy, becomes more visible upon lowering T (Fig. 3a, plotted vs wavelength in Supplementary Fig. 4), and is thus the zero-phonon line (ZPL) of the inter-band transition. This observation is exceptional for ensemble measurements on carbon nanostructures, where the ZPL is usually broadened by polydispersity, disorder in the individual nanostructures such as edge and width fluctuations, and inter-structure energy transfers. The optical response therefore demonstrates the superb level of cleanliness of the de-bundled GNRs. We can thus directly probe the T-evolution of the semiconducting bandgap (ΔG) from the ZPL position (PL for 3.06 eV excitation, Supplementary Fig. 5). The low-T non-monotonic behaviour (Fig. 3c) resembles that observed in semiconducting CNTs23, with the slight decrease in the 2.33 eV data probably due to increasing emission from the twilight states at slightly lower energy. It is important to notice that, as in other carbon-based nanomaterials23, the total shift is around 10 meV, much larger than the 1 meV effect produced by thermal expansion. The behaviour shows good agreement with what is expected for semiconductors, where24 \({\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}}}(T)={\Delta }_{{{{{{{{\rm{G}}}}}}}}}(0)+A{\left(1-{e}^{{E}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}/{k}_{{{{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}}}T}\right)}^{-1}\), where kB is the Boltzmann constant, A is the Fan parameter, and the Bose-Einstein statistical factor contains the characteristic phonon energy Eph25. We obtain Eph= 30 ± 2 meV and 35 ± 2 meV for the two excitation wavelengths, close to the RBLM energy, revealing that phonon coupling to the RBLM is the key mechanism modulating ΔG, as also backed up by the T-dependence of the D and G Raman lines (Supplementary Fig. 6). Intuitively, this is expected: the RBLM is the one altering the GNR width, responsible for the electronic confinement.
The T-dependence of the line-broadening parameter Γ(T) of the ZPL reveals what phonons play a major role. Fitting with the expression \(\Gamma (T)={\Gamma }_{0}+{\Gamma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}={\Gamma }_{0}+\gamma {\left({e}^{{E}_{{{{{{{{\rm{ph}}}}}}}}}/{k}_{{{{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}}}T}-1\right)}^{-1}\), yields the inhomogeneous broadening linked to scattering on terminations26, Γ0 = 16.89 ± 0.03 meV, the homogeneous broadening produced by phonon scattering27 Γph, and an electron-phonon coupling strength γ = 2.1 ± 0.3 meV with phonons at energy Eph = 7.1 ± 0.7 meV. Interestingly, these are the very same transverse bending modes that strongly modulate the electron transport in transistors made from the same GNRs17.
A similar energy is obtained for the gap between bright and twilight states, Δ, as extracted from the ZPL peak intensity vs T (Fig. 3e). Assuming exciton thermalisation, the PL intensity I can be described as5 \(I\propto \frac{1}{{({T}^{2}+{T}_{0}^{2})}^{1/4}}\cdot \frac{m+{e}^{-\Delta /kT}}{1+{e}^{-\Delta /kT}}\) where the power-law dependence is characteristic of one-dimensional excitons, m describes the spectral weight of the excitonic states4 and T0 is a T-independent Lorentzian broadening term. The intensity maximum around 75K indicates the presence of two sets of excitonic states separated by Δ = 6 meV, similarly to CNTs5,28, but with the spectral weight of twilight states m = 0.68 ± 0.04 ≈ 4 times larger5 than that of the CNT dark states (Fig. 3e). This means that, while multiple excitonic states are present, they do not quench PL nearly as much as in CNTs.
The resulting emission is thus so bright that it reveals a series of different spectral features (Fig. 2d). All features of the optical response are reproduced by the sum of the ZPL, G and RBLM phonon sidebands, the second interband transition E1214, plus a low-energy excimer PL peak at 1865 meV (identified from bundled 4-CGNRs) and a wide Lorentzian contribution for the high-energy absorbance, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7). The maxima of both PL and absorbance are separated by one G-band phonon from the ZPL and the periodicity of the narrow PL features, when fitted with a multiple peak fit with independent free parameters, matches the predicted RBLM phonons precisely (inset Fig. 2d). The RBLM and G phonon contributions deviate clearly from a purely Franck–Condon behaviour which produces PL and absorbance spectra as mirror images of each other (see Supplementary Text 1, Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 7 for Franck–Condon modelling results).
The optical spectra were analysed by considering the Debye–Waller factor \(\alpha=\frac{J}{J+\Phi }\), which determines the probability of zero-phonon transitions29 by comparing the integrated intensities of the ZPL J(ω) and of the phonon wing Φ(ω). The type of electron-phonon coupling present is then revealed by the T-dependence of α (Fig. 3b). In purely Franck–Condon (FC) coupled systems, α is strongly T-dependent, while for Herzberg–Teller (HT) coupling α is T-independent30. In the presence of both FC and HT couplings, we expect α to be different for absorption and PL bands31. Our measurements at 77 K give α = 0.010 ± 0.003 for absorbance vs. α = 0.06 ± 0.01 for PL, showing that both types of coupling are actually present, in agreement with theoretical predictions of GNRs with edge modulations (Fig. 1a)14.
This analysis allows us to build a full energy level diagram, where the twilight states are separated from the usual bright ones, and a series of different vibronically coupled modes produce strong mixing with the electronic states and enhance the PLQE (Fig. 2d, 4).
PLE and time-resolved PL spectroscopy
Photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra complete the understanding of the fundamental electron-phonon interaction for twilight states (Fig. 5a).
The three absorbance peaks observed confirm the assignment, but normalising the PLE spectra to the peak excitation energy shows abrupt variations of the brightest excitation: upon crossing the ZPL, the peak excitation energy shifts from Eexc = 2.30 eV (ZPL+1G) to 2.34 eV (ZPL+1G+1RBLM) (Fig. 5b). This observation unveils the mechanism producing emission: below the ZPL, creation of one G phonon is the dominant mechanism in both absorption and consecutive PL emission, whereas emission of an RBLM plus a G phonon dominates the absorption for ZPL emission. Close to the ZPL, the strong mixing of the G and RBLM modes also yields E21 + G peak oscillations with an energy corresponding to the RBLM. The mechanism is not universal and is different for the second interband transition at Eexc = 2.60 eV, which is much stronger in the PLE compared to the absorbance data (Supplementary Fig. 8). Carriers excited into the second conduction band are more likely to relax internally from the second to the first conduction band at low k values than to follow a multiphonon-assisted transition.
Finally, we reveal how the twilight states respond dynamically: In the first few nanoseconds, PL spectra show low-energy emission from vibronic coupling to the RBLM and G modes, while by 10 ns emission is dominated by the long-lived, higher-energy D and ZPL transitions directly to the ground state (Fig. 5c, d). This new strong emission process arises as carriers cross over to the twilight states mediated by vibronic coupling and emit at the higher energy zero-phonon line. The state lifetimes can be extracted from biexponential fitting of the time dependence of the signal (Fig. 5e), yielding 0.6 ± 0.1 ns for the bright states, and 3.6 ± 0.3 ns and 2.9 ± 0.3 ns for the ZPL and D-mode emission from the twilight ones (Fig. 4).
Overall, these results reveal GNRs as the carbon nanostructures that can overcome excitonic K-K’ valley quenching to enable bright optical emission. The 8% quantum yields achieved in these first experiments here are already beyond those of most nanocarbon materials7,32,33,34. More importantly, we reveal mechanisms that can be used to turn dark states into much brighter twilight ones, where the fundamental symmetry is altered by the perfect edge modulation obtained by molecular design. These twilight states not only yield high PL efficiencies, but also a superior resolution of the spectral features, so that access to the fundamental optical processes is available. It is notable that this level of detail is very unusual in extended carbon nanostructures and is achieved both in solutions and thin films, i.e. in conditions suitable for applications. These results open new experimental possibilities: topological and quantum processes can now be investigated not just by surface probe techniques13, but also optically and with the associated time-resolved techniques35,36. Direct insight into the mechanisms, with internal relaxation processes dominated by phonons, already indicates long exciton lifetimes and associated exciton motion, offering a way to chemically tune the optical response. The chemical versatility of GNRs also opens up their use as a new family that can be integrated with established systems such as poly-acenes37. The GNR side groups can be modified to bind to biological structures, or bear quantum coherent units, making these systems an exceptionally versatile optical platform for bio-imaging,3 optoelectronics17,35,36 and quantum technologies38,39.
Methods
Details of the sample preparation are provided in the Supplementary Methods. Raman spectra were acquired with a Jobin Yvon T64000 triple spectrometer and an Andor DU420A-OE CCD and excited with a Ventus solo Nd:YAG laser with excitation energy Eexc = 2.33 eV. Absorption, photoluminescence and PLE of GNRs were investigated in chloroform solutions (0.2 and 0.05 mg/ml, respectively) for T = 295 K and in transparent EVA polymer matrices at lower T. Absorbance measurements were conducted with a Perkin-Elmer UV/Vis-NIR spectrophotometer Lambda 35. PL data were acquired with a Princeton Applied Research Model 1235 triple grating 0.3 m spectrograph coupled to an Andor iDus 416 CCD and excited with a LaserQuantum Ventus532 532 nm (2.33 eV) laser or a 405 nm (3.06 eV) laser diode. PLE maps were measured at 295 K with a 75 W Xenon lamp (Photon Technology International Inc.) scanned by a monochromator and connected to a spectrometer leading to an InGaS photodiode array (OMA V, Princeton Instruments). Note that the Xenon lamp does not have sufficient power to operate at resolutions required to resolve the ZPL. Time-resolved PL was measured on a PicoQuant FluoTime 300 (4 ps resolution) and a PicoQuant LHD-P-C-405 (3.06 eV) pulsed laser diode at 4 MHz repetition rate on GNR in chloroform solution (0.05 mg/ml). PLQE. Photoluminescence quantum efficiency was measured with a Roithner MLL-III-405-200mW (3.06 eV) laser, an integrating sphere and a calibrated QEPro OceanInsight grating spectrometer on GNR in chloroform solution.
First principle calculations
Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were implemented in SIESTA40. We employed Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functional41 in the calculation of the band structure. Energy cut-off of 400 Ry and the Monkhorst-Pack grid of (21,1,1) were used. A vacuum region of at least 18 Å is added in nonperiodic directions to prevent unwanted interactions. We removed the alkyl chain in the side groups to simplify the calculation. The structure was optimized until the maximum force on the atoms is less than 0.01 eV/Å. In the Density of States (DOS) calculation gaussian broadening of 0.05 eV is used for all bands.
In the phonon calculation, we adopted tighter criteria for structure relaxation and convergence. Perdew-Zunger (PZ) local density approximation (LDA) functional42 was used. The energy cut-off was increased to 800 Ry. Monkhorst-Pack k-sampling was set to (50, 1, 1). Due to the computational complexity, we further simplify the result and only keep anthracene in the side groups. The structure was relaxed with maximum allowed force of 0.004 eV/Å Then a supercell of [3, 1, 1] was created for calculating phonon dispersion.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available online within the Oxford University Research Archive at the Bodleian Library of Oxford43. No custom code is used.
References
Wang, F., Dukovic, G., Brus, L. E. & Heinz, T. F. The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons. Science 308, 838–841 (2005).
Arnold, M. S. et al. Recent developments in the photophysics of single-walled carbon nanotubes for their use as active and passive material elements in thin film photovoltaics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 14896–14918 (2013).
Ferrari, A. C. et al. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems. Nanoscale 7, 4598–4810 (2015).
Zhao, H., Mazumdar, S., Sheng, C. X., Tong, M. & Vardeny, Z. V. Photophysics of excitons in quasi-one-dimensional organic semiconductors: Single-walled carbon nanotubes and π -conjugated polymers. Phys. Rev. B - Conden. Matter Mater. Phys. 73, 1–11 (2006).
Mortimer, I. B. & Nicholas, R. J. Role of bright and dark excitons in the temperature-dependent photoluminescence of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 1–4 (2007).
Avouris, P., Freitag, M. & Perebeinos, V. Carbon-nanotube photonics and optoelectronics. Nat. Photo. 2, 341–350 (2008).
Mouri, S., Miyauchi, Y. & Matsuda, K. Dispersion-process effects on the photoluminescence quantum yields of single-walled carbon nanotubes dispersed using aromatic polymers. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 10282–10286 (2012).
Martel, R., Schmidt, T., Shea, H. R., Hertel, T. & Avouris, P. Single- and multi-wall carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2447–2449 (1998).
Que, M., Zhang, B., Chen, J., Yin, X. & Yun, S. Carbon-based electrodes for perovskite solar cells. Mater. Adv. 2, 5560–5579 (2021).
Banerjee, S., Hemraj-Benny, T. & Wong, S. S. Covalent surface chemistry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 17, 17–29 (2005).
Martel, R. Sorting carbon nanotubes for electronics. ACS Nano 2, 2195–2199 (2008).
Ando, T. Effects of valley mixing and exchange on excitons in carbon nanotubes with aharonov-bohm flux. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 75, 1–12 (2006).
Jiang, S., Neuman, T., Boeglin, A., Scheurer, F. & Schull, G. Topologically localized excitons in single graphene nanoribbons. Science 379, 1049–1053 (2023).
Villegas, C. E., Mendonça, P. B. & Rocha, A. R. Optical spectrum of bottom-up graphene nanoribbons: Towards efficient atom-thick excitonic solar cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 1–7 (2014).
Huang, Y. et al. Intrinsic Properties of Single Graphene Nanoribbons in Solution: Synthetic and Spectroscopic Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 10416–10420 (2018).
Zhao, S. et al. Fluorescence from graphene nanoribbons of well-defined structure. Carbon 119, 235–240 (2017).
Niu, W. et al. Exceptionally clean single-electron transistors from solutions of molecular graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Mater. 22, 180–185 (2023).
Narita, A. et al. Synthesis of structurally well-defined and liquid-phase-processable graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Chem. 6, 126–132 (2014).
Gillen, R., Mohr, M., Thomsen, C. & Maultzsch, J. Vibrational properties of graphene nanoribbons by first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. B 80, 155418 (2009).
Gillen, R., Mohr, M. & Maultzsch, J. Symmetry properties of vibrational modes in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 81, 1–9 (2010).
Verzhbitskiy, I. A. et al. Raman Fingerprints of Atomically Precise Graphene Nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 16, 3442–3447 (2016).
Jorio, A., Saito, R., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Raman Spectroscopy in Graphene Related Systems. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH Berlin (2011).
Capaz, R. B., Spataru, C. D., Tangney, P., Cohen, M. L. & Louie, S. G. Temperature dependence of the band gap of semiconducting carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 1–4 (2005).
Fan, H. Y. Temperature dependence of the energy gap in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 82, 900–905 (1951).
Vaĭnshteĭn, I. A., Zatsepin, A. F. & Kortov, V. S. Applicability of the empirical varshni relation for the temperature dependence of the width of the band gap. Phys. Solid State 41, 905–908 (1999).
Rudin, S., Reinecke, T. L. & Segall, B. Temperature-dependent exciton linewidths in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 42, 218–231 (1990).
Viswanath, A. K. & Lee, J. I. Exciton-phonon interactions, exciton binding energy, and their importance in the realization of room-temperature semiconductor lasers based on GaN. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 58, 16333–16339 (1998).
Shaver, J. et al. Magnetic brightening of carbon nanotube photoluminescence through symmetry breaking. Nano Lett. 7, 1851–1855 (2007).
Wallis, R. F. Localized Excitations in Solids, 1st edn. p. 43ff (Springer New York, 1968).
Maradudin, A. A. Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of the Effects of Point Defects and Disorder on the Vibrations of Crystals. Solid State Phys. 18, 273–420 (1966).
Osad’ko, I. S. Determination of electron-phonon coupling from structured optical spectra of impurity centers. Soviet Phys. Uspekhi 22, 311–329 (1979).
Nish, A. A., Hwang, J. Y., Doig, J. & Nicholas, R. J. Highly selective dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes using aromatic polymers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 640–646 (2007).
Lefebvre, J., Austing, D. G., Bond, J. & Finnie, P. Photoluminescence imaging of suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett. 6, 1603–1608 (2006).
Graf, A. et al. Large scale, selective dispersion of long single-walled carbon nanotubes with high photoluminescence quantum yield by shear force mixing. Carbon 105, 593–599 (2016).
Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S. Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 38–51 (2018).
Bayliss, S. L. et al. Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing. Science 370, 1309–1312 (2020).
Rao, A. & Friend, R. H. Harnessing singlet exciton fission to break the shockley–queisser limit. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–12 (2017).
Slota, M. et al. Magnetic edge states and coherent manipulation of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 561, E31 (2018).
Gaita-Ariño, A., Luis, F., Hill, S. & Coronado, E. Molecular spins for quantum computation. Nat. Chem. 11, 301–309 (2019).
Soler, J. M. et al. The siesta method for ab initio order-n materials simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2745 (2002).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).
Sturdza, B. Data set for publication: Emissive brightening in molecular graphene nanoribbons by twilight states (2023). https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:39bcb60c-0956-4014-a72e-4714e47fdf1b.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding from EPSRC (CDT-PV-EP/L01551X/1), University College, Oxford (Oxford-Radcliffe scholarship), EU (ERC-StG 338258 OptoQMol, ERC-CoG 819698 T2DCP, ERC-CoG MMGNRs, Marie-Curie-IF 894761 MolecularMAGNET, Marie-Curie-ITN 813036 ULTIMATE, FET 101017821 LIGHT-CAP, Pathfinder-101099676-4D-NMR, and GrapheneCore3 881603), the Royal Society (University Research Fellow and URF grant), the Max Planck Society and machine time by the Oxford Advanced Research Computing facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BS performed the optical measurements. FK performed the numerical calculations. XY and WN prepared the samples supervised by JM, LB and XF. RN and LB conceived the experiments. BS, FK, RN and LB analysed the data, developed the interpretative framework, and prepared the manuscript. LB and BS made the figures. RN, MR and LB supervised the work. All authors discussed the final manuscript and provided feedback.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Zijie Qiu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sturdza, B.K., Kong, F., Yao, X. et al. Emissive brightening in molecular graphene nanoribbons by twilight states. Nat Commun 15, 2985 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47139-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47139-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.