Abstract
Yellow-seed trait is a desirable breeding characteristic of rapeseed (Brassica napus) that could greatly improve seed oil yield and quality. However, the underlying mechanisms controlling this phenotype in B. napus plants are difficult to discern because of their complexity. Here, we assemble high-quality genomes of yellow-seeded (GH06) and black-seeded (ZY821). Combining in-depth fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for seed color with other omics data reveal BnA09MYB47a, encoding an R2R3-MYB-type transcription factor, as the causal gene of a major QTL controlling the yellow-seed trait. Functional studies show that sequence variation of BnA09MYB47a underlies the functional divergence between the yellow- and black-seeded B. napus. The black-seed allele BnA09MYB47aZY821, but not the yellow-seed allele BnA09MYB47aGH06, promotes flavonoid biosynthesis by directly activating the expression of BnTT18. Our discovery suggests a possible approach to breeding B. napus for improved commercial value and facilitates flavonoid biosynthesis studies in Brassica crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.; AACC, 2n = 38), a relatively recent allotetraploid (<7500 years ago), originated from natural hybridization between its diploid progenitors B. rapa (AA, 2n = 20) and B. oleracea (CC, 2n = 18)1. B. napus is an important oilseed crop that supplies vegetable oil for human consumption and biodiesel production, and is a source of protein-rich feed for livestock2. The yellow-seed trait is particularly desirable in B. napus, as it is associated with higher oil and protein yields and improved seed quality3,4. Furthermore, this trait is associated with more transparent oil, lower fiber content, desirable aroma, and higher nutrients content5,6 (Supplementary Fig. 1), and facilitates industrial processing, as yellow seeds lack the pigment deposits found in black/dark B. napus that interfere with processing.
Although B. napus is the most important Brassica oilseed species, natural rapeseed germplasms with the yellow-seed trait have not been identified. Yellow-seeded B. napus lines were created by interspecific hybridization with related species, for example, between B. rapa and B. oleracea, Brassica juncea and Brassica carinata, B. napus, and Sinapis alba, and Brassica alboglabra and B. rapa7,8,9,10. However, as the yellow-seed trait is a quantitative trait that is also affected by environmental factors, obtaining stable commercial B. napus varieties with yellow seeds is challenging. In the 1990s, we developed the yellow-seeded genetic resource of B. oleracea from B. oleracea var. aceaphala by mutation and subsequently bred commercial yellow-seeded B. napus varieties through interspecific hybridization between B. rapa and B. juncea (Supplementary Fig. 1). The widely cultivated yellow-seeded elite B. napus variety GH06 was derived from the interspecific hybridization between the Brassica species (A and C genomes)3,11, and selected as the breeding parent of Yu-yellow No. 1 (China National certified No. 2003024, Supplementary Fig. 1), a popular cultivar in the Yangtze River area and southwestern China with a cultivation area exceeding 10 million acres11. Recently, several more yellow-seeded varieties (e.g., Yu-yellow No. 2, Yu-yellow No. 4, and Yuyou28) and many more yellow-seeded germplasm resources have been developed (Supplementary Fig. 1), serving as the leading B. napus cultivated varieties in southwestern China (http://www.moa.gov.cn). Therefore, understanding the mechanism controlling the yellow-seed trait in GH06 is imperative for the oilseed industry, which can provide a theoretical basis for breeding and speed up the breeding process.
Given its important commercial value, exploring the mechanism of the yellow-seed trait has been a hotspot in the past three decades. However, the inheritance of the yellow-seed trait in B. napus is complex. The candidate genes controlling seed color in B. napus vary depending on the genetic background, and the trait usually requires three or four independent alleles12,13,14,15. The effects of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) controlling seed color in diverse populations have been analyzed using classical genetic tools15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23. A major QTL with strong effects on seed color has been widely identified on chromosome A09 in different studies19,22,23,24. Our previous results showed that the yellow-seed trait in GH06 is mainly controlled by a few dominant genes, which are subjected to epistatic and environmental effects3,11, and the candidate QTL region was also identified using two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations derived from the same female parent, GH0619. However, the causal genes of the yellow-seed trait within these loci have not been identified or characterized to date.
In this study, we further characterize the major QTL on chromosome A09 (explaining >40% of the phenotypic variance) using a RIL population derived from a cross between the female parent GH06 (yellow-seeded) and the male parent ZY821 (black-seeded), both of which are elite B. napus varieties grown in China25 that are often used as control cultivars26,27. To dissect the genetic mechanism underlying the yellow-seed trait, we first generate high-quality reference genomes of GH06 and ZY821 using PacBio, high‐throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. Combining the de novo assembled genome sequences with QTL sequencing and map-based cloning reveal BnA09MYB47a, encoding an R2R3-MYB-type transcription factor, as the causal gene of a major QTL controlling the yellow-seed trait. We further demonstrate that BnA09MYB47a regulates flavonoid biosynthesis in B. napus seed coats. The results provide insights into the transcriptional regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis genes in polyploid crops and highlight the potential application of molecular mechanism studies on yellow seeds for breeding oil-rich varieties in Brassica crops.
Results
De novo assembly and annotation of the GH06 and ZY821 genomes
To study the molecular mechanism of seed color development in B. napus, we used GH06, a yellow-seeded cultivar, and ZY821, a black-seeded cultivar, as parents to construct a mapping population. We sequenced these two parental genomes using the PacBio Sequel platform, which generated 117.44 Gbp (139×) and 116.99 Gbp (136×) of data from GH06 and ZY821, respectively (Supplementary Data 1). We used the self-corrected PacBio reads for constructing contigs, which were then polished using Illumina paired-end reads (Supplementary Data 2), and produced contig assemblies with N50 of 3.65 Mbp and 3.64 Mbp for GH06 and ZY821, respectively. We then used Dovetail Hi-C data to refine these assemblies (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b, Supplementary Data 2). Approximately 94.04% of the 846.29 Mbp GH06 assembly and 93.34% of the 863.16 Mbp ZY821 assembly were assigned to 19 pseudo-chromosomes (Fig. 1a), with scaffold N50 of 47.79 Mbp and 48.81 Mbp, respectively. The quality of the two assemblies was comparable to that of other B. napus reference genomes28,29,30,31 (Table 1, Supplementary Data 3). The collinearity analyses results showed that the difference in the length of the genome assemblies between GH06, ZY821 and B. napus reference genomes was mainly caused by the differences in the assembly of centromere and telomere repeat sequences (Supplementary Figs. 3–8). The pseudo-chromosomes of GH06 and ZY821 showed high collinearity, except for a large inversion on chromosome C09 (Supplementary Fig. 9), where the assembly was supported by Hi-C data (Supplementary Fig. 10). By comparing the two assemblies, we detected 18,505 structure variations (SVs), including 10,208 insertions and 8297 deletions (Supplementary Data 4). Notably, the A sub-genome (with 11,937 SVs) exhibited more variations than the C sub-genome (with 6332 SVs) (Fig. 1b), suggesting that the A sub-genome has undergone more genetic recombination events during B. napus evolution. Furthermore, Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologue (BUSCO) results showed that 99.6% and 99.7% of the 1614 core genes in the OrthoDB Embryophyta database32 were detected in the GH06 and ZY821 assemblies (Table 1), respectively. These results confirmed the completeness of these de novo-assembled genomes.
a Circos plot showing the characteristics of the GH06 and ZY821 assemblies. I: Syntenic regions between the GH06 and ZY821 assemblies based on homology searches carried out with MCscan (python version). II: GC contents in non-overlapping 1-Mbp windows. III: Percent coverage of TEs in non-overlapping 1-Mbp windows. IV: Gene densities calculated based on the number of genes in non-overlapping 1-Mbp windows. V: Lengths of pseudo-chromosomes, with white and gray backgrounds representing the pseudo-chromosomes of GH06 and ZY821, respectively. Each ticket above the pseudo-chromosomes is on a scale of 10 Mbp. b Structural variation (SV) distribution between the GH06 and ZY821 genomes, with ZY821 serving as the reference sequence. c Schematic diagram of the technical roadmap for this study. The yellow- (Y1-Y25) and black-seeded (B1-B25) B. napus lines were used to construct the extreme bulks. Scale bar, 1.0 mm for GH06 and ZY821 and 0.5 mm for Y1–Y25 and B1-B25. d QTL-seq applied to the RIL populations identified the seed coat color locus. The permutation test was used for this analysis. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-index plots showing Δ(SNP-index) (in red) along the 19 chromosomes with statistical confidence intervals under the null hypothesis of no QTLs (green, P < 0.01; pink, P < 0.05). The red inverted triangle indicates the location of the significant locus.
The GH06 and ZY821 assemblies contained 50.99% and 51.67% repetitive sequences, respectively (Supplementary Data 5). The distribution of the divergence rates for each type of transposable element (TE) was similar for the two genomes (Supplementary Fig. 11). Although the overall abundance of repetitive sequences was similar between the two assemblies, the proportion of Copia-type repeated sequences varied considerably (7.64% vs. 11.57%) (Supplementary Data 6). We annotated 97,639 and 98,067 protein-coding genes with strong evidence in GH06 and ZY821, respectively, by combining ab initio prediction, homologous protein prediction, and transcriptome alignment. Of these protein-coding genes, 95.60% and 96.08%, respectively, were supported by the functional annotation information (Supplementary Data 7, Supplementary Fig. 12). The average lengths of genes, exons, and introns were similar among the GH06, ZY821, and Darmor-bzh (v4.1) assemblies. However, the average gene length of the Darmor-bzh (v9) assembly was nearly twice that of GH06, ZY821, and eight other B. napus genomes published by ref. 28. (Supplementary Data 8). This discrepancy may be due to the different sequencing and assembly strategies used to create the Darmor-bzh (v9) assembly. In addition, we annotated 5891 and 6251 non-coding RNAs in the GH06 and ZY821 assemblies, respectively, including 330 microRNAs (miRNAs) in each parent, 813 and 679 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), 3558 and 4099 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 1190 and 1143 small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), respectively (Supplementary Data 9). These high-quality parental genomes and the comprehensive variations database obtained here form the foundation for subsequent analyses in this study.
QTL-seq analysis for seed coat color in B. napus
The seed color differed substantially between the two parental lines, GH06 and ZY821, and also varied considerably for each parent between different growing environments (Supplementary Data 10). Seed color showed a continuous distribution in the RIL population, indicating quantitative inheritance (Supplementary Fig. 13). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant variability in seed color among the individual RILs within the population (Supplementary Data 10).
Based on phenotyping data generated for the RIL population, we subjected two extreme pools for seed color (25 black-seeded individuals and 25 yellow-seeded individuals) to the QTL-seq pipeline analysis (Fig. 1c). We used a higher sequencing depth for the individuals in the two extreme pools than for the parents (Supplementary Data 11). After strict filtering (see Methods), the sequencing depths for the black-seeded and yellow-seeded pools were 44.05 × and 40.75 ×, respectively, ensuring that the average sequencing depth of each sample in the pools was more than 1 ×. The clean data from the two extreme pools and the parents were aligned to the ZY821 and Darmor-bzh (v4.1) reference genomes using BWA software31. The alignment results showed that we obtained a higher mapping rate using the ZY821 reference genome than the Darmor-bzh (v4.1) reference genome. The mapping rate of the four samples using ZY821 as the reference sequence was 99.02–99.70%, and that using Darmor-bzh (v4.1) as the reference sequence was 98.37–98.70% (Supplementary Data 12). After using a conservative quality filter pipeline (see Methods), we detected 1.39 million genome-wide homozygous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between GH06 and ZY821 (Supplementary Data 13), of which 44.21% were located in intergenic regions, 14.73% in intronic regions, and 16.62% in coding sequences. Among the coding regions, there were 141,588 synonymous and 87,550 non-synonymous SNPs. Moreover, we identified 260,137 genome-wide insertions/deletions (InDels), of which 38.27% were located in intergenic regions, 22.28% in intronic regions, and 2.90% in coding sequences. Among the InDels in coding regions, we identified 1299 frameshift deletions and 1273 frameshift insertions (Supplementary Data 13).
QTL-seq analysis identified 42.06 Mbp of candidate intervals, of which 24.33 Mbp were located on chromosome A09, which had the highest Δ(SNP-index) value (Fig. 1d). Within this chromosome, the window with the highest value was located at 44.19–45.19 Mbp (Table 2). The Δ(SNP-index) values for the intervals on chromosomes A03, A05, and C08 were only slightly higher than the threshold (P < 0.01), indicating that these were minor QTLs, which could be involved in seed color (Table 2). The pattern of the QTL-seq results using Darmor-bzh (v4.1) as the reference sequence was similar to that referenced against ZY821 (Supplementary Fig. 14). Notably, however, we found additional QTLs on the A09 scaffolds when compared with Darmor-bzh (v4.1) (Supplementary Fig. 15), indicating that the major QTL regions on A09 were incomplete in the Darmor-bzh (v4.1) assembly. We then aligned the A09 scaffold QTL region (chrA09_random: 1580000–4133004) of Darmor-bzh (v4.1) to the Darmor-bzh (v9) and ZY821 genomes, respectively. The alignment results showed that 87.50% of the sequences could be mapped to the ZY821 A09 chromosome, and 75.39% to the Darmor-bzh (v9) A09 chromosome. Thus, using the parental genome of the RIL population as the reference genome improves the reliability of the results and may facilitate subsequent QTL mining. To narrow down the candidate intervals in the major QTL for seed color on chromosome A09, we used a larger RIL population and two different segregating populations (F2:3 and BC3F2).
Identification of the candidate gene by QTL analysis and fine mapping
The previously reported markers EM11ME20/200 and CB10092/55017 were mapped to chromosome A09 of ZY821. To further confirm the location of the candidate QTL on A09, we added 195 SNP markers (using the Brassica 60 K Infinium BeadChip Array)33, spanning a region of 76.30 cM, with an average distance of 0.39 cM between the two adjacent markers, to the A09 chromosome map. Using composite interval mapping (CIM), we mapped the major QTL interval between markers SWU-SNP02 (SNP21172A09) and SWU-SNP10 (SNP21274A09) (44.10–45.19 Mbp on A09 of ZY821), covering 1.09 Mbp of chromosome A09 within the RIL population, accounting for 45.06–60.35% of the phenotypic variance in seed color (Fig. 2a, b, and Supplementary Data 14 and 15).
a Scanning of the seed coat color QTL (SC) in a B. napus RIL population. b The seed color locus was detected on chromosome A09 in the RIL population. Positional cloning narrowed the SC locus to a 1.09-Mbp region between SWU-SNP02 and SWU-SNP10. c The SC locus was detected on chromosome A09 in the F2:3 and BC3F2 populations. Positional cloning narrowed the SC locus to a 79.76-kbp region between SWU-InDel03 and SWU-InDel04. The orange rectangle indicates the candidate gene. d Structure of the BnA09MYB47a alleles from black-seeded ZY821 and yellow-seeded GH06 of B. napus. The light-blue rectangles represent the exons, and the numbers inside each rectangle represent its size (bp). The green rectangle represents the inserted fragment, and the numbers inside the rectangle represent its size.
To fine-map the major QTL, we generated 413 F2:3 individuals and 2,416 BC3F2 individuals from crosses between the recurrent parents ZY821 and yellow-seed line E393 (Supplementary Fig. 16). A Chi-square goodness-of-fit test indicated that the segregation ratio of seed coat color in the F2:3 population deviated from the expected 1:3 ratio (121 yellow vs. 292 black, χ2 = 1.98, P > 0.05). The same was true for the BC3F2 population, which exhibited a ratio of yellow-seeded lines to black-seeded lines of 549:1867 (χ2 = 3.45, P > 0.05). Using newly developed markers based on InDels and SNPs in the major QTL region of A09 between the parents, GH06 and ZY821, we further delimited the region to between markers SWU-InDel03 and SWU-InDel04 (~79.76 kbp) by PCR identification and homology-based cloning (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Data 16). Based on the ZY821 genome sequence, we annotated 13 candidate genes in this interval, four of which (ZY821040006.1, ZY821040007.1, ZY821040009.1 and ZY821040010.1) showed significant variations (Supplementary Data 17, Supplementary Fig. 17). We further performed sequence alignments for the allelic variation of ZY821040006.1 among different germplasm accessions. Notably, the sequences of ZY821040006.1 were highly similar among the black-seeded accessions but differed substantially from those of the yellow-seeded GH06 and No2127 germplasms10 (Supplementary Fig. 18). ZY821040006.1 was annotated as encoding an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, which was the homolog of Arabidopsis MYB47 in our phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 19, Supplementary Data 18). Therefore, we named the ZY821040006.1 as BnA09MYB47a.
BnA09MYB47a is involved in seed coat pigmentation
Cloning and sequencing of the A sub-genome-specific BnA09MYB47a from B. napus revealed an open reading frame (ORF) of 837 bp in the black-seeded ZY821 allele and 765 bp in the yellow-seeded GH06. Sequence alignment between these two ORFs revealed considerable variations, with four SNPs in exons and a large deletion in exon 3 and intron 2 of GH06 (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 17). In addition, reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis showed that the expression of BnA09MYB47a was significantly lower in developing seeds of yellow-seeded plants (GH06 and E518) than in those of black-seeded plants (ZY821 and ZS9) (Fig. 3a). These results suggest that BnA09MYB47a might be involved in regulating seed coat color.
a Relative expression of BnA09MYB47a in developing seed coats in different genetic backgrounds. b Relative expression of BnA09MYB47a in developing seed coats from ZY821 and RNAi-BnA09myb47a transgenic plants. In (a) and (b), seed coat development is divided into three developmental stages (i.e., at 20, 30, and 40 DAF). BnActin7 (EV116054) was used as the housekeeping gene. P values were calculated using multiple t tests without adjustments, with comparisons made against the level in ZY821. Values represent the average ± SEM of three biological replicates. c Phenotypes of RNAi-BnA09myb47a transgenic seeds and control seeds (ZY821) at different developmental stages. DAF, days after flowering. Scale bars, 1 mm, (d–k) Localization of proanthocyanidins and phenolic compounds (stained with toluidine blue O, in cyan) in the developing seed coat of RNAi-BnA09myb47a (d–g) and ZY821 (h–k). Assays were performed three times using tissues from three independent experiments. e, epidermis; s, sub-epidermis; pal, palisade layer; pig, pigment layer; hi, hilum; em, embryo; co, cotyledon; DAF, days after flowering. (d–k) Scale bars, 20 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
AtMYB47 is differentially expressed in Arabidopsis seed coats and chalaza, but it is not involved in the yellow-seed trait34. To verify whether BnA09MYB47a is involved in the seed coat color of B. napus, we knocked down BnA09MYB47a by RNA interference (RNAi) in black-seeded ZY821 and overexpressed the ZY821 allele (BnA09MYB47aZY821) driven by the cauliflower mosaic virus 35 S promoter (CaMV35S) in yellow-seeded GH06. BnA09MYB47a expression was significantly reduced in transgenic RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines in the ZY821 background (Fig. 3b). Compared to wild-type ZY821 seeds, the seeds of RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines had greatly reduced seed coat color during seed development (Fig. 3c). By contrast, overexpressing BnA09MYB47a in GH06 resulted in a darkened seed coat color (Supplementary Fig. 20).
Phenolic compounds, such as flavonols, anthocyanins, and proanthocyanidins (PAs), are the predominant pigments in B. napus seed coats25,35,36,37. Toluidine blue O staining, in which cations react with acidic substances such as phenolic compounds and cause them to appear blue25, revealed that phenolic compounds were clearly reduced in the RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines relative to ZY821 (Fig. 3d–k). We did not observe staining in the hilum of RNAi-BnA09myb47a seeds until 40 days after flowering (DAF) (Fig. 3f), whereas these compounds started accumulating in the seed coat at 20 DAF and peaked at 40 DAF in ZY821 (Fig. 3h–k). These results support the hypothesis that BnA09MYB47a functions in seed pigmentation in B. napus.
BnA09MYB47a participates in flavonoid biosynthesis and accumulation
During seed coat pigmentation, the oxidized form of flavonoids and PAs are biosynthesized and accumulated in the seed coats38,39,40. We analyzed the differential metabolites between the seed coats of RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines and ZY821 using an ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography with heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC − HESI − MS/MS) system. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed a low variability among biological repeats, meaning that the results were highly reproducible (Fig. 4a). The differentially detected metabolites, including quercetin, isorhamnetin, kaempferol, epicatechin, and their derivatives (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 21, Supplementary Data 19), were mostly enriched in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 4b). Among them, [DP2]−1, [DP2]−2, epicatechin, km-3-O-glucoside-7-O-glucoside, [DP3]−1, [DP3]−2, is-O-glucoside-sulfate, and quercetin-3-O-glucoside were significantly reduced in the RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines compared to ZY821 (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Data 20). Opposite results were observed in the BnA09MYB47aZY821-overexpressing lines in the GH06 background, with the corresponding metabolites being significantly increased compared to GH06 (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Data 21). Furthermore, we measured the PAs levels by directly subjecting the pellet remaining after solvent extraction to oxidative cleavage under hot acidic butanol. PAs levels were significantly increased in the overexpressing lines but significantly reduced in the RNAi lines (Fig. 4d, e). Together, these data indicate that BnA09MYB47a modulates flavonoid biosynthesis and accumulation in B. napus seed coats.
a Principal component analysis (PCA) of metabolites in seed coats. Different colored dots represent the ZY821 (black), RNAi-1 (RNAi-BnA09myb47a-1, yellow), and RNAi-2 (RNAi-BnA09myb47a-2, blue). Different shapes represent the developmental stages of the seed coat. b KEGG pathways associated with the biosynthesis of differential metabolites in the seed coat. P values by one-tailed hypergeometric test with false discovery rate. c Heatmap representing the relative contents of compounds (nmol/g FW) in GH06 and ZY821 (as controls) and transgenic (overexpression [OE] and RNAi) samples, with the ratio expressed in log2 scale. RNAi-47, RNAi-BnA09myb47a, and OE-47, BnA09MYB47a-overexpression. Contents of soluble (d) and insoluble (e) proanthocyanidins (PAs) in the seed coats of ZY821, GH06, OE-BnA09MYB47a and RNAi-BnA09myb47a transgenic lines. P values were calculated using multiple t tests without adjustments, compared to levels in ZY821. Values represent the average ± SEM of three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
BnA09MYB47a positively regulates BnTT18 in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway
Flavonoid biosynthesis is tightly regulated by biosynthetic enzymes and various transcription factors (TFs), such as MYB, basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH), and WD40 repeat (WD40) TFs41,42,43. To investigate whether BnA09MYB47a regulates flavonoid biosynthesis, we firstly transiently expressed a construct encoding a BnA09MYB47a-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein in B. napus (Fig. 5a) and Nicotiana benthamiana leaves, onion (Allium cepa) epidermal cells, and Arabidopsis protoplasts (Supplementary Fig. 22). We exclusively detected the fusion protein in the nucleus, indicating that BnA09MYB47a functions as a transcription factor. Next, we identified 28,757 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the seed coats of RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines and ZY821 (Supplementary Fig. 23) over the different stages of seed development. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed that these DEGs were enriched in the top 20 significant metabolic pathways (q-value ≤ 0.05), and in particular, 74 DEGs (Supplementary Fig. 24) were enriched in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 5b). Among these 74 DEGs, we validated the expression of six genes (PAL, encoding phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TT4, encoding chalcone synthase; TT3, encoding dihydroflavonol-4-reductase; TT6, encoding flavonol 3’-hydroxylase; TT18, encoding leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenases involved in proanthocyanin biosynthesis; and AUTOINHIBITED H( + )-ATPASE ISOFORM 10 (AHA10), encoding an H+-APTase involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis) in the seed coats of RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines and ZY821 at 10, 20, 30, and 40 DAF by RT-qPCR (Fig. 5c). As expected, the expression levels of these genes were consistently lower in the seed coats of RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines than in those of ZY821 (Fig. 5c).
a Subcellular localization of free GFP and BnA09MYB47a-GFP fusion proteins in B. napu protoplasts. Scale bars, 20 μm. Assays were performed three times using protoplasts from three independent experiments. b Word cloud of top 20 significant metabolic pathways (q-value ≤ 0.05) for the DEGs between control (ZY821) and RNAi samples. The figure was generated using https://wordart.com/. c The relative expression of BnPAL, BnTT3, BnTT4, BnTT6, BnAHA10, and BnTT18 in developing seed coats of RNAi transgenic plants compared to those of ZY821, as determined by RT-qPCR. Relative gene expression was normalized to the expression values in ZY821 at 10 days after flowering (DAF). P values were calculated using multiple t tests without adjustments. Data are presented as average ± SEM of 3 biological repeats. d Dual-luciferase reporter assay showing that BnA09MYB47aZY821 rather than BnA09MYB47aGH06 regulates BnTT18 promoter activity. Values are normalized to the level of the blank effector and presented as mean ± SEM from three biological repeats. P values were calculated using multiple t tests without adjustments. e Probes used in the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). f EMSA was used to assess the binding of BnA09MYB47aZY821 and BnA09MYB47aGH06 to the promoter element in BnTT18. g BnTT18 is a downstream target of BnA09MYB47a. Upper panel, diagram of the BnTT18 promoter fragments (P1 and P2) used in chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR). The red and black boxes in P1 and P2, respectively, indicate the detection probes used in the EMSA, as shown in (e). Lower panel, BnA09MYB47a-mediated ChIP-qPCR enrichment. Chromatin prepared from transgenic leaves using an anti-Flag antibody (IP) was detected by qPCR with IgG as the control. BnActin7 and BnTT18-P2 were used as nonspecific targets. Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 6). P values were calculated using the two-tailed Student’s t test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Next, we compared the transactivation activities of the BnA09MYB47aZY821 and BnA09MYB47aGH06 variants using the dual-luciferase reporter assays. BnA09MYB47aZY821 could directly activate the BnTT18 promoter in vivo, but neither BnaA09MYB47a variant possessed regulatory effects on BnTT3, BnTT6, or BnAHA10 promoters (Fig. 5d). We further validated the regulating relationship between BnA09MYB47a and BnTT18 promoter using a yeast one-hybrid assay (Supplementary Fig. 25a), and proved that BnTT18 was the target gene of BnA09MYB47a by DNA-affinity purification sequencing (DAP-seq) (Supplementary Fig. 25b, c). Importantly, an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that glutathione S-transferase (GST)-MYB47 recombinant protein bound DNA probe 1 containing the core motif (5’-AGTTAGTTA-3’) but not the mutated versions (Mut1 and Mut2) or DNA probe 2 without any core motifs (Fig. 5e, f). Furthermore, we confirmed that BnA09MYB47aZY821 was significantly enriched at the P1 target loci containing DNA probe 1 of BnTT18 compared to nonspecific targets using chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) (Fig. 5g). Finally, BnTT18 was differentially expressed between the three yellow-seeded lines (GH06, L1188, and L1266) and three black-seeded lines (ZY821, ZS11, and L1267), but we did not observe sequence differences in BnTT18 between these different genetic backgrounds (Supplementary Fig. 26). Collectively, these results indicate that BnA09MYB47a positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis by directly activating BnTT18 expression. Our results also indicate that the BnA09MYB47a variant in blacked-seeded ZY821 is functional, whereas the BnA09MYB47a variant in yellow-seeded GH06 is ineffective, resulting in the difference in seed color between these B. napus lines.
Discussion
Although B. napus is grown worldwide, especially in Europe, Asia, Australia and North America, yellow-seeded varieties are not extensively cultivated. The yellow-seed trait is sought after in B. napus breeding because these varieties tend to have higher oil and protein contents and lower levels of pigmentation than black-seeded varieties in the same genetic background35,36,37. However, naturally occurring B. napus genotypes are all black-seeded. The yellow-seed trait is commonly developed by interspecific hybridization7,8,9,10 and is a quantitative trait influenced by multiple factors, including polygenic control, maternal effects, and environment3,44,45,46.
The first commercial yellow-seeded B. napus hybrid was released in 2003, and many elite advanced yellow-seeded breeding lines have since been bred (Supplementary Fig. 1). The yellow-seeded GH06 and black-seeded ZY821 cultivars have been widely used in basic B. napus research and breeding programs3,11,19,24,25,37,47. To fully exploit their genetic potential, we generated high-quality genome sequences of GH06 and ZY821 by integrating data from PacBio sequencing, Illumina paired-end short-read sequencing, and Hi-C technologies, and revealed extensive genomic and phenotypic variations between these cultivars. The reference genomes of the parental lines and the mapping population generated in this study improve the mapping accuracy, and reduce the errors caused by the genetic distance of the other publicly available genomes, facilitating the detection of the genetic variations uniquely linked to the yellow-seed trait. Notably, we narrowed a major QTL controlling seed color on chromosome A09 based on reference genomes of the parental lines and the mapping population (Figs. 1, 2).
To date, numerous QTLs19,21,23,48,49 and candidate genes25,39,40,50,51,52,53 involved in seed color have been reported in B. napus, while the major causal gene(s) have not been identified, and the detailed molecular mechanism by which seed color is determined in B. napus remains largely unknown. In previous reports, several key genes encoding regulatory factors of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathways, including TTG1, TT1, TT2 and TT8, have been identified and found to influence seed coat pigmentation in various Brassica species39,40,54,55,56,57. Indeed, these genes are differentially expressed between black- and yellow-seeded B. napus25,58,59,60. In this study, using high-quality genomes, whole-genome resequencing, RNA-seq analysis, and fine mapping, we identified an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, BnA09MYB47a, that controls seed coat color in B. napus (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 20). Arabidopsis MYB47 is mainly expressed in the seed coat during seed development and contributes to seed longevity34, but it is not involved in the yellow-seed trait. However, most flavonoid biosynthesis genes are expressed in black-seeded B. napus during seed development25,35,39,40,47,51,53,55,61, but they are also expressed in the yellow-seeded lines. It is difficult to produce yellow-seeded B. napus lines directly from black-seeded lines by inhibiting the expression of individual flavonoid biosynthesis genes. Therefore, we infer that in B. napus many flavonoid biosynthesis genes functionally diverged and/or that their regulation was altered following gene duplications during interspecific hybridization. Accordingly, natural variations in BnA09MYB47a resulted in the yellow-seeded trait in B. napus.
The amount of flavonoids (Supplementary Data 20) and PAs were significantly reduced in RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines compared to wild-type ZY821 (Fig. 4), which is in agreement with previous findings that PAs are major constituents of dark seed coats in Brassica species25,36,37,61,62,63,64. Flavonoid biosynthesis genes were also significantly repressed in seed coats during seed development in the RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines (Supplementary Fig. 24). Indeed, homologs of flavonoid biosynthesis genes involved in seed color have been characterized in other Brassica crops25,35,39,40,47,51,53,55,61. Among these, TT3 and TT18 were demonstrated to play important roles in anthocyanins and PAs biosynthesis65,66. Here, we revealed that BnA09MYB47aZY821 directly activates BnTT18 expression (Fig. 5), thereby positively regulating flavonoid biosynthesis. In addition, BnTT18 was differentially expressed between the yellow- and black-seeded B. napus cultivars, but did not display sequence differences (Supplementary Fig. 26), indicating that its regulation by BnA09MYB47a is responsible for the differences in seed coat pigmentation. However, the transactivation activity of BnA09MYB47a differed significantly between black-seeded ZY821 and yellow-seeded GH06 (Fig. 5d), indicating that the variations in BnA09MYB47aGH06 changed its function (Fig. 2d). The R2R3-MYB, bHLH, and WD40 (MBW) ternary complexes governing the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway are well characterized in many species43,67,68. Further studies are needed to determine whether MYB47 is involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway by forming MBW complexes.
Overall, our results revealed BnA09MYB47a acted as a critical regulator underlying seed coat pigmentation, and a promising candidate gene for breeding high-quality B. napus. This study also improves our understanding of the regulation of PAs and anthocyanin biosynthesis in B. napus, in which the transcription factor BnA09MYB47a has vital roles (Fig. 6).
BnA09MYB47aZY821 positively regulates flavonoid biosynthesis by directly activating BnTT18 expression. Whereas the BnA09MYB47aGH06 is ineffective, resulting in the difference in seed color between B. napus lines.
Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
The male and female rapeseed (Brassica napus) parental lines used in this study were yellow-seeded GH06 and black-seeded Zhongyou 821 (ZY821). These plants were characterized previously25. The population of 188 recombinant inbred lines (RILs, at the F2:11 generation) from a cross between ZY821 and GH06 was grown in a field in Beibei, Chongqing, China in 2005, 2006, 2010, 2011, 2013 and 2018 and their traits were collected for mapping. In addition, the yellow-seeded E518 and black-seeded ZS9 cultivars with different genetic backgrounds were used for RT-qPCR analysis. All experiments were conducted under the same field management conditions.
A segregating population was constructed by self-pollinating the F1 plant resulting from the cross between the yellow-seeded line E68 and black-seeded line E85, which were derived from the RIL-1 population19 and had generally similar genetic backgrounds. Finally, an F2:3 generation consisting of 421 families derived from each F2 individual by self-pollination was used to genotype the F2 individuals. Another yellow-seeded line, E398, was chosen from among the RILs as the donor parent and was repeatedly backcrossed with ZY821 as the recurrent parent. In the third backcross generation, 2416 BC3F2 near-isogenic lines (NILs) were chosen based on linked markers, for marker analyses and phenotypic evaluation (Supplementary Fig. 16). The F2:3 plants and NILs were grown in a field in Beibei, Chongqing, China from 2009 to 2012. All experiments were conducted under the same field management conditions. Open-pollinated seeds were collected from five randomly chosen plants in each line at maturity for the above analysis.
Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0; Col-0) plants were grown in pots at 22–23 °C in a culture chamber under a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod with 12,000 lux of supplementary light, and the humidity of the illuminated chamber was approximately 60%.
PacBio, Illumina and RNA-seq library construction, and sequencing
Two different DNA libraries were constructed and sequenced according to the manufacturers’ instructions: (i) whole-genome sequencing on the PacBio Sequel platform (20-kb library); and (ii) short-read paired-end sequencing (150 bp in length) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. To annotate the transcripts of the two genomes (ZY821 and GH06), two strand-specific RNA-seq libraries with an insert size of 350 bp were prepared using the NEBNext® UltraTM Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs, USA) and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform to generate 150-bp paired-end reads (Frasergen Bioinformatics Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). Total RNA was extracted from 35 different tissues of ZY821 and three mixed tissues of GH06 and were then sequenced and used to annotate the two genomes.
Hi-C library construction and sequencing
A Hi-C library was prepared using the Dovetail Hi-C Library preparation kit. Briefly, nuclear chromatin was fixed in plant tissues with formaldehyde and extracted. Fixed chromatin was digested with DpnII, and sticky ends were filled with biotinylated nucleotides and ligated. Then, crosslinks were reversed, and the purified DNA was treated to remove any free biotin from ligated fragments. DNA was then sheared to ~350 bp, and biotinylated fragments were enriched through streptavidin bead pulldown, followed by PCR amplification to generate the library. The library was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform (Novogene, Tianjin, China).
Genome assembly
De novo assembly of ZY821 and GH06 was performed using flye (version 2.5) (https://github.com/fenderglass/Flye/)69 based on PacBio raw reads with two iterations of polishing. Using the algorithm Arrow (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/GenomicConsensus), which takes into account all of the underlying data and the raw quality values inherent in SMRT sequencing, the assembly was polished again for the consensus accuracies, and then pillon (v1.22) was used to correct errors introduced into the assembly as a result of errors in the long reads.
To obtain a chromosome-level genome assembly, the Hi-C technique was used to process the temporary assembly. Detailed data processing procedures were as follows: (1) The paired-end Illumina reads were mapped onto the polished temporary genome assembly using HiC-Pro (V2.11.1)70 with default parameters to filter the raw Hi-C reads. Self-ligated, non-ligated, and invalid reads (such as PCR amplification, random break, and extreme fragments) were discarded. (2) Juicer (V1.6.2)71 and 3D-DNA (version 180114)72 were applied to cluster the genomic contig sequences into potential chromosomal groups. (3) JuiceBox (v1.11.8) was employed to validate the contig orientation and to remove ambiguous fragments with the help of manual inspection.
Annotation of repeats
There are two main types of repeats in the genome: tandem and interspersed. Tandem repeat sequences were identified using Tandem Repeats Finder (TRF, version 4.07)73. The interspersed repeat contents of the B. napus genome were identified using de novo repeat identification and known repeat searching against existing databases. Two de novo software packages, RepeatModeler (v1.0.8) and LTR_FINDER (v1.0.6)74, were used to predict repeat sequences in the genome, RepeatMasker (version 4.0.7) (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) was then used to search the B. napus genome against the combined de novo transposable element (TE) library. The homology-based approach to identifying TE repeats in the assembled genome involved applying commonly used databases of known repetitive sequences, RepeatMasker (version 4.0.7) and the Repbase database (version 21). TEs were identified at the DNA level using RepeatMasker and at the protein level RepeatProteinMasker.
Gene prediction and annotation
Protein-coding region identification and gene prediction were conducted through a combination of homology-based prediction, de novo prediction, and transcriptome-based prediction methods. Proteins from six Brassicaceae plant genomes (B. juncea, B. napus, B. nigra, B. oleracea, B. rapa and A. thaliana) were downloaded from the Brassica Database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/). The candidate homology-based genes were searched by TblastN75 with an E-value cutoff of 1e-5. The TblastN results were then processed by Sorting Out Local Alignment Result76 to obtain the best hit of each alignment. Subsequently, GeneWise (version 2.4.1)77 was used to predict the gene structure of the corresponding genomic regions on each genblasta hit. Three ab initio gene prediction programs, Augustus (version 3.2.1)78, GlimmerHMM (version 3.0.4)79 and SNAP (version 2006-07-28)80, were used to predict coding regions in the repeat-masked genome. Finally, RNA-seq data were mapped to the assembly using hisat2 (version 2.0.1)81. Stringtie (version 1.2.2)82 and TransDecoder (version 3.0.1) were then used to assemble the transcripts and identify candidate coding regions in gene models. All gene models predicted from the above three approaches were combined by EvidenceModeler (EVM)83 into a non-redundant set of gene structures, and the resulting gene models were finally refined with the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments (v2.3.3)84. Protein-coding genes were functionally analyzed using BLASTP (E-value cutoff of 1e-05)85 against two integrated protein sequence databases: SwissProt and TrEMBL. Protein domains were annotated using InterProScan (V5.30)86. The Gene Ontology terms for each gene were extracted with InterProScan. The pathways in which the genes might be involved were assigned by BLAST against the KEGG databases (release 84.0)87, with an E-value cutoff of 1e-5.
Annotation of non-coding RNAs
Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes were predicted by tRNAscan-SE (version 1.3.1)88. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) fragments were identified by aligning to Arabidopsis and rice (Oryza sativa) template rRNA sequences using BlastN (version 2.2.24) at an E-value cutoff of 1e-5. MicroRNA (miRNA) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA) genes were identified by searching against the Rfam database (release 12.0) using INFERNAL (version 1.1.1)89.
Whole-genome sequencing of bulked DNA
The RIL population, comprising 188 individuals, was constructed by crossing GH06 (yellow-seeded) and ZY821 (black-seeded) followed by 11 generations of selfing. Twenty-five lines from each phenotype extreme (yellow seeds and black seeds) were selected for developing two extreme bulks. DNA was extracted from 100 mg of fresh leaves from each line using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN Sciences), and then DNA from each line was mixed in an equal ratio. Libraries of 350-bp insert size were constructed and sequenced with 150-bp paired-end reads on the Illumina Xten platform according to the manufacturer’s standard protocols (Novogene, Tianjin, China). The two parental lines, GH06 and ZY821, were also sequenced.
Sequencing data filtering, alignment, and variation calling of the bulked DNA
Raw reads were filtered by Trimmomatic (version 0.36)90 based on their quality score in five steps: (1) removal of adapters; (2) removal of bases from the start or end of a read; if the Phred quality was lower than 3; (3) scanning of the reads with a 4-bp sliding window, removing the window when the average Phred quality per base was below 15; (4) discarding reads with lengths less than 75 bp; and (5) retaining only paired reads. Clean reads were aligned to the ZY821 and Darmor-bzh (v4.1) genome sequences31 using BWA software (v0.7.12)91 with the parameter: ‘mem -t 4 -k 32 –M’. PCR duplicates were removed using SAMtools (v1.3.1)92. SNP and InDel calling was performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (v3.7-0-gcfedb67)93 with the UnifiedGenotyper approach. To remove the potential false-positive variations, SNPs and InDels with QD < 2.0 or FS > 60.0 or MQ < 20.0 or MQRankSum < –12.5 or ReadPosRankSum < –8.0 were filtered out. Gene-based SNP and InDel annotation were performed according to the GH06 genome annotation using the package ANNOVAR (v2013-06-21)94. Upstream and downstream regions were defined as a 1-kb region upstream from the transcription start site or downstream from the transcription termination site, respectively.
Genotyping and SNP-index calculation of the bulked DNA study
To obtain accurate SNP genotyping data, we further filtered the SNPs using the following criteria: (1) the sequencing depth of each bulk and parent at each site was no less than 5; (2) the SNP in each parent was homozygous with different genotypes; and (3) the genotype of ZY821 was consistent with the ZY821 genome sequence.
The SNP-index for each SNP position was calculated for both the bulks according to QTL-seq method95. The method applied sliding window analysis to SNP-index plots with 1-Mbp window size and 10-kbp increment. Windows with SNPs < 10 were skipped, and 100,000 replications of the permutation test were employed to determine the 95% and 99% cutoff values. These intervals were plotted for all the genomic regions with variable read depths.
Quantification of seed coat color
Seeds were harvested from three to five open-pollinated plants per genotype. The seed coat color was quantified using the Near-Infrared Reflectance Analyzer (DS2500, Foss Analytical A/S)19,96. Seed coat color was recorded in seven seasons (2005, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2011, 2013, and 2018). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 software.
Locus identification for seed color
Total genomic DNA was extracted for SNP analysis24. Using the Brassica 60 K Infinium BeadChip Array, which included 52,157 Infinium Type II SNP loci from the genomic and transcriptomic sequencing data of genetically diverse Brassica germplasms (Isobel Parkin, Agriculture and AgriFood Canada), the genotypes of 188 RILs and the parental lines were generated at the National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Subcenter of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070 Wuhan, China. Then genetic linkage analyses24 were performed using the software packages MSTmap97 and JoinMap 4.098. The QTL for seed color was detected using the Windows QTL Cartographer 2.599 following the composite interval mapping method with a LOD threshold of 2.5 (LR ≥ 11.5). The relative contribution of a genetic component was calculated as the proportion of the additive effect and the phenotypic variance explained by that component99. The linkage group order and QTLs in the map were processed using Mapchart 2.1100. QTL nomenclature followed that of ref. 101.
Fine mapping of the major locus for seed coat color
A BC3F2 and an F2:3 population were used for fine-mapping the seed color QTL, which was based on a rough mapping of the RIL population. To further pinpoint the location of the recombination nearest to the seed coat color locus, bulked segregant analysis was performed to screening markers linked to seed color102. Equivalent amounts of DNA from 20 randomly selected yellow-seeded and 20 randomly selected black-seeded individuals were used to construct a yellow and a black bulk from each of the BC3F2 and F2:3 populations. Then, markers were developed based on the differences between parental sequences in the candidate region. These markers were used to determine the genotypes of the recombinants in the BC3F2 and F2:3 populations. The markers are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
Candidate gene cloning and transgenic analysis
To identify candidate genes, the DNA sequence information of each candidate gene was mapped to the ZY821 reference genome. To identify the candidate genes in the region of the major QTL on chromosome A09, total RNA extracted from developing seeds of GH06 and ZY821 at 20, 30, and 40 days after flowering (DAF) and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Novogene, Tianjin, China).
The results of the fine-mapping and candidate gene detection were confirmed using two methods. First, the PacBio subreads of GH06 were mapped to the ZY821 reference sequence using minimap2 software, and the structural variations of the candidate genes were manually confirmed with the IGV tool. Second, RT-PCR was used to determine the candidate genes, cloned using the cDNAs originating from ZY821 and GH06, and sequenced to confirm whether there were sequence differences in candidate genes in ZY821 and GH06. All specific primers used in the RT-PCR analysis and cloning are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
Subsequently, the RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated BnA09MYB47a knockdown and the BnA09MYB47a-overexpressing lines were separately generated by inserting the corresponding constructs into the pFGC5941 and pCAMBIA-2301 vector and then transforming each vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404, respectively. Plants were transformed using the floral dip method103. Primers used in this experiment are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
Microscopic observation of seed samples
To understand the variation of seed coat color during seed development, siliques were randomly sampled at 20, 30, 40, and 50 DAF and photographed under a stereoscopic light microscope (Olympus SZ61, Münster, Germany).
Quantification of proanthocyanidins contents of seeds
PAs contents were quantified using the BuOH-HCl method104. Three independent batches of seed samples were assessed. Each sample was assayed in triplicate to obtain a mean value. The PAs content is shown as the sample’s absorbance value per unit weight.
Flavonoid extraction and UPLC − HESI − MS/MS analysis
Seed coats were harvested at 20, 30, and 40 DAF from individual plants of ZY821, RNAi-BnA09myb47a, GH06, and BnA09MYB47a-overexpressing lines. The raw flavonoids were extracted from the flash-frozen fresh seed coats (100 mg fresh weight), and subjected to UPLC − HESI − MS/MS analysis25,37. Flavonoid metabolites were identified by retention times, mass spectrometry, and public information25,35,36,37. The contents of flavonoid metabolites were calculated using the standard curves of available standards: epicatechin, quercetin, kaempferol, and isorhamnetin (Sigma, Aldrich, Shanghai, China). Metabolomics analysis was also performed using Compounds Discoverer 3.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA). The Raw MS data have been deposited in MetaboLights under accession number MTBLS6703 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/search). Chemical structure depiction was retrieved from the PubChem database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). All analyses were conducted in triplicate, and the values were represented as means ± SD of three replicates. Statistical significance was based on Tukey’s test, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Transcriptomic analysis
To investigate the expression of the genes associated with the seed coat color, total RNA was extracted from developing seeds of GH06, ZY821, and the RNAi-BnA09myb47a lines at 20, 30, and 40 DAF, and then treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) to remove genomic DNA. RNA integrity was assessed with a BioAnalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). RNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® UltraTM Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England Biolabs, USA) with an insert size of 300 bp for RNA-seq analysis using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System, which can generate short reads in the 150 -bp paired-end mode105.
Subcellular localization
The complete open reading frame (ORF) of BnA09MYB47aZY821 (ZY821040006.1) was amplified and inserted into the pNC-Cam1304-SubC (GFP) vector106 with green fluorescent protein located at the C terminus of the target protein (primers used are listed in Supplementary Data 22). The recombinant plasmids were transformed into B. napus protoplasts, Arabidopsis, onion, and N. benthamiana. pNC-Cam1304-SubC (GFP) was employed as the positive control. Green fluorescence was visualized with a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSM8002400301, Carl Zeiss, Germany) at 15 h after transformation.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The 2000-bp promoter sequences upstream of the start codon of BnAHA10, BnTT3, BnTT6 and BnTT18 were individually inserted into the pNC-Green-Luc vector. The BnA09MYB47a coding sequences from ZY821 and GH06 were cloned into the pNC-Green-SK vector. pNC-Green-Luc containing the promoter and the pNC-Green-SK-BnA09MYB47a plasmids were mixed at a ratio of 5:1 and transformed into B. napus protoplasts. The ratio of Firefly luciferase (LUC) to Renilla luciferase (REN) activity was measured using the Dual-Glo® Luciferase Assay System (Promega) on a luminescence detector (Promega, GloMax 20/20) at 12–16 h after transformation. The ratio of LUC to REN (LUC/REN) activity was then determined107.
Yeast one-hybrid assay
The promoter sequence (1500 bp upstream of the start codon) of BnTT18 was cloned into the pNC-AbAi vectors as bait. The fusion plasmid linearized by Bsp1191 endonuclease was transformed into Y1H Gold competent cells following the manufacturer’s instructions (Weidi, Shanghai, China). The transformed yeast cells were selected on single dropout medium (SD/-Ura) with a gradient concentration of aureobasidin A (AbA) to identify the optimal concentration that could completely suppress the growth of the transformed yeast cells. The BnA09MYB47aZY821 (ZY821040006.1) coding sequence was cloned into the pGADT7 vector, and then the recombinant vector was transformed into competent cells containing the bait plasmid. The transformed yeast cells were selected on SD/-Leu/-Ura medium containing 200 ng/mL AbA for DNA-protein interaction analysis. The empty pGADT7 vector was transformed into the bait-specific reporter strain as a negative control. The primers used in the experiments are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
DNA-affinity purification sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted with the CTAB method and fragmented to 100–200 bp using the Bioruptor Plus instrument (Diagenode, Liege, Belgium). Magnetic beads were used to screen target fragments and then the DNA fragments were ligated to Illumina sequencing adapters with the NEXT-flex Rapid DNA-Seq Kit (BIOO Scientific, Austin, USA). The HaloTag-BnA09MYB47a fusion proteins and HaloTag empty vector (used as a negative control) were translated in vitro using the TnT® coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) for DAP-seq108.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
To produce glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged proteins, BnA09MYB47a was amplified and cloned in the pGEX4T-1 vector and expressed in the Escherichia coli strain Rosetta. Recombinant GST-BnA09MYB47a protein was purified by GST-tag Purification Resin (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). GST fusion proteins was detected by anti-GST antibodies (Abcam, ab9085), which was diluted 1000 folds and used for protein-DNA binding. EMSA was performed using the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). The recombinant protein was incubated with labeled probes at room temperature for 20 min; the unlabeled probes were used as a competitor to examine the specificity of binding. Protein-probe complexes were separated by electrophoresis on a native 6% acrylamide gel and the DNA was electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and detected by chemiluminescence. Sequences of DNA probes used in EMSA are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays
The full-length BnA09MYB47a coding sequence was amplified and cloned into the pNC-Cam33FC vector, generating a plasmid vector for expressing the p35S::BnA09MYB47a-Flag fusion. The vector was transformed into B. napus, and transgenic leaves were used for ChIP-qPCR109. Immunoprecipitations was performed with anti-DDDDK-tag mAb-Magnetic Beads (MBL, D153-11) at 4 °C overnight. The precipitated DNA served as a template for qPCR using the KOD SYBR® Green Mix (TOBOYO, OSAKA, Japan). Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 22.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The genome sequence and annotation data for ZY821 and GH06 and their transcriptomic data have been deposited in the NCBI database under BioProject accession PRJNA770894. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Nagaharu, U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot. 7, 389–452 (1935).
Kimber D. S., McGregor D. I. The species and their origin, cultivation and world production. In: Kimber, D. and McGregor, D. I., Eds, Brassica Oilseeds, Production and Utilization CAB International, Wallingford, 1-7 (1995).
Tang, Z. L., Li, J. N., Zhang, X. K., Chen, L. & Wang, R. Genetic variation of yellow-seeded rapeseed lines (Brassica napus L.) from different genetic sources. Plant Breed. 116, 471–474 (1997).
Meng, J. L., Shi, S. W., Gan, L., Li, Z. Y. & Qu, X. S. The production of yellow-seeded Brassica napus (AACC) through crossing interspecific hybrids of B. campestris (AA) and B. carinata (BBCC) with B. napus. Euphytica 103, 329–333 (1998).
Getinet, A., Rakow, G. & Downey, R. K. Agronomic performance and seed quality of Ethiopian mustard in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76, 387–392 (1996).
Shirzadegan, M. & Robbelen, G. Influence of seed color and hull proportion on quality properties of seeds in Brassica napus L. Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 87, 235–237 (1985).
Wen, J. et al. Characterization of interploid hybrids from crosses between Brassica juncea and B. oleracea and the production of yellow-seeded B. napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 19–32 (2012).
Rashid, A., Rakow, G. & Downey, R. K. Development of yellow seeded Brassica napus through interspecific crosses. Plant Breed. 112, 127–134 (1994).
Li, A. et al. Molecular and cytological characterization of introgression lines in yellow seed derived from somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Sinapis alba. Mol. Breed. 29, 209–219 (2012).
Chen, B. Y., Heneen, W. K. & Jönsson, R. Resynthesis of Brassies napus L. through interspecific hybridization between B. alboglabra Bailey and B. campestris L. with special emphasis on seed colour. Plant Breed. 101, 52–59 (1988).
Liu, L. et al. QTL mapping of seed coat color for yellow seeded Brassica napus. Acta Genet. Sin. 33, 181–187 (2006).
Shirzadegan, M. Inheritance of seed color in Brassica napus L. Z. Pflanzenzuecht. 96, 140–146 (1986).
Liu, X., Tu, J., Chen, B. & Fu, T. Identification and inheritance of a partially dominant gene for yellow seed colour in Brassica napus. Plant Breed. 124, 9–12 (2005).
Rahman, M. H. Production of yellow‐seeded Brassica napus through interspecific crosses. Plant Breed. 120, 463–472 (2001).
Badani, A. G. et al. Colocalization of a partially dominant gene for yellow seed colour with a major QTL influencing acid detergent fibre (ADF) content in different crosses of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Genome 49, 1499–1509 (2006).
Liu, Z. W. et al. Development of SCAR and CAPS markers for a partially dominant yellow seed coat gene in Brassica napus L. Euphytica 149, 381–385 (2006).
Liu, Z. W., Fu, T. D., Tu, J. X. & Chen, B. Y. Inheritance of seed colour and identification of RAPD and AFLP markers linked to the seed colour gene in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 110, 303–310 (2005).
Xiao, S. S. et al. Generation and mapping of SCAR and CAPS markers linked to the seed coat color gene in Brassica napus using a genome-walking technique. Genome 50, 611–618 (2007).
Fu, F. Y. et al. Localization of QTLs for seed color using recombinant inbred lines of Brassica napus in different environments. Genome 50, 840–854 (2007).
Yan, X. Y. et al. Co-location of seed oil content, seed hull content and seed coat color QTL in three different environments in Brassica napus L. Euphytica 170, 355–364 (2009).
Zhang, Y. et al. Identification of two major QTL for yellow seed color in two crosses of resynthesized Brassica napus line No. 2127-17. Mol. Breed. 28, 335–342 (2011).
Stein, A. et al. Dissection of a major QTL for seed colour and fibre content in Brassica napus reveals colocalization with candidate genes for phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and flavonoid deposition. Plant Breed. 132, 382–389 (2013).
Chao, H., Guo, L., Zhao, W., Li, H. & Li, M. A major yellow-seed QTL on chromosome A09 significantly increases the oil content and reduces the fiber content of seed in Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 135, 1293–1305 (2022).
Liu, L. et al. A high-density SNP map for accurate mapping of seed fibre QTL in Brassica napus L. PLoS One 8, e83052 (2013).
Qu, C. et al. Differential accumulation of phenolic compounds and expression of related genes in black-and yellow-seeded Brassica napus. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2885–2898 (2013).
Zhao, J. et al. Patterns of differential gene expression in Brassica napus cultivars infected with Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 10, 635–649 (2009).
Girard, I. et al. RNA sequencing of Brassica napus reveals cellular redox control of Sclerotinia infection. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 5079–5091 (2017).
Bayer, P. E. et al. Modelling of gene loss propensity in the pangenomes of three Brassica species suggests different mechanisms between polyploids and diploids. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 2488–2500 (2021).
Song, J. et al. Eight high-quality genomes reveal pan-genome architecture and ecotype differentiation of Brassica napus. Nat. Plants 6, 34–45 (2020).
Song, J. et al. BnPIR: Brassica napus pan-genome information resource for 1689 accessions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 412–414 (2021).
Chalhoub, B. et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345, 950–953 (2014).
Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 227–245 (2019).
Zhu, M. et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes controlling seed pigments of rapeseed. J. Integr. Agr. 20, 2862–2879 (2021).
Renard, J. et al. Identification of novel seed longevity genes related to oxidative stress and seed coat by genome‐wide association studies and reverse genetics. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 2523–2539 (2020).
Auger, B. et al. A detailed survey of seed coat flavonoids in developing seeds of Brassica napus L. J. Agric Food Chem. 58, 6246–6256 (2010).
Wang, Y. et al. Correlation analysis of phenolic contents and antioxidation in yellow- and black-seeded Brassica napus. Molecules 23, 1815 (2018).
Qu, C. et al. Comparative analysis of the metabolic profiles of yellow- versus black-seeded rapeseed using UPLC-HESI-MS/MS and transcriptome analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68, 3033–3049 (2020).
Lepiniec, L. et al. Genetics and biochemistry of seed flavonoids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 405–430 (2006).
Lian, J. et al. Silencing of BnTT1 family genes affects seed flavonoid biosynthesis and alters seed fatty acid composition in Brassica napus. Plant Sci. 254, 32–47 (2017).
Zhai, Y. et al. Targeted mutagenesis of BnTT8 homologs controls yellow seed coat development for effective oil production in Brassica napus L. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 1153–1168 (2020).
Xu, W. et al. Complexity and robustness of the flavonoid transcriptional regulatory network revealed by comprehensive analyses of MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes and their targets in Arabidopsis seed. N. Phytol. 202, 132–144 (2014).
Appelhagen, I. et al. Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase in Arabidopsis thaliana: characterization of mutant alleles and regulation by MYB–BHLH–TTG1 transcription factor complexes. Gene 484, 61–68 (2011).
Xu, W., Dubos, C. & Lepiniec, L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB–bHLH–WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 176–185 (2015).
Deynze, A. V., Beversdorf, W. & Pauls, K. Temperature effects on seed color in black-and yellow-seeded rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73, 383–387 (1993).
Shi, S. J. & Wu, J. S. The study of seedcoat color in Yellow-seeded Brassica napus. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 22, 608–612 (2003).
Xuan, L. et al. Comparison of vitality between seedlings germinated from black-coated and yellow-coated seeds of a turnip rape (Brassica rapa L.) subjected to NaCl and CdCl2 stresses. Plant Growth Regul. 76, 61–70 (2015).
Qu, C. et al. Genome-wide survey of flavonoid biosynthesis genes and gene expression analysis between black- and yellow-seeded Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1755 (2016).
Wang, J. et al. Genome-wide association mapping of seed coat color in Brassica napus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65, 5229–5237 (2017).
Wang, F. et al. Embryonal control of yellow seed coat locus ECY1 is related to alanine and phenylalanine metabolism in the seed embryo of Brassica napus. G3 6, 1073–1081 (2016).
Lu, J., Li, J., Lei, B., Wang, S. & Chai, Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of two Brassica napus TTG1 genes reveal genus-specific nucleotide preference, extreme protein-level conservation and fast divergence of organ-specificity. Genes Genom. 31, 129–142 (2009).
Zhang, K. et al. Gene silencing of BnTT10 family genes causes retarded pigmentation and lignin reduction in the seed coat of Brassica napus. PLoS One 8, e61247 (2013).
Chai, Y. R. et al. TRANSPARENT TESTA12 genes from Brassica napus and parental species: cloning, evolution, and differential involvement in yellow seed trait. Mol. Genet Genom. 281, 109–123 (2009).
Xu, B. B. et al. Cloning and molecular characterization of a functional flavonoid 3’-hydroxylase gene from Brassica napus. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 350–363 (2007).
Wang, Y., Xiao, L., Dun, X., Liu, K. & Du, D. Characterization of the BrTT1 gene responsible for seed coat color formation in Dahuang (Brassica rapa L. landrace). Mol. Breed. 37, 137 (2017).
Xie, T. et al. Targeted knockout of BnTT2 homologues for yellow-seeded Brassica napus with reduced flavonoids and improved fatty acid composition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68, 5676–5690 (2020).
Li, X. et al. A large insertion in bHLH transcription factor BrTT8 resulting in yellow seed coat in Brassica rapa. PloS One 7, e44145 (2012).
Padmaja, L. K. et al. Natural mutations in two homoeologous TT8 genes control yellow seed coat trait in allotetraploid Brassica juncea (AABB). Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 339–347 (2014).
Zhang, D. et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Brassica juncea. J. Integr. Agric. 19, 1250–1260 (2020).
Jiang, J. et al. Transcriptomic comparison between developing seeds of yellow- and black-seeded Brassica napus reveals that genes influence seed quality. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 203 (2019).
Hong, M. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of seed coats in yellow-seeded Brassica napus reveals novel genes that influence proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1674 (2017).
Akhov, L. A. L., Ashe, P. A. P., Tan, Y. T. Y., Datla, R. D. R. & Selvaraj, G. S. G. Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in the seed coat of yellow-seeded, canola quality Brassica napus YN01-429 is constrained at the committed step catalyzed by dihydroflavonol 4-reductase. Botany 87, 616–625 (2009).
Marles, M. & Gruber, M. Y. Histochemical characterisation of unextractable seed coat pigments and quantification of extractable lignin in the Brassicaceae. J. Sci. Food Agric. 84, 251–262 (2004).
Pourcel, L. et al. TRANSPARENT TESTA10 encodes a laccase-like enzyme involved in oxidative polymerization of flavonoids in Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Cell 17, 2966–2980 (2005).
Sharma, S. B. & Dixon, R. A. Metabolic engineering of proanthocyanidins by ectopic expression of transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 44, 62–75 (2005).
Marles, M. A. S., Gruber, M. Y., Scoles, G. J. & Muir, A. D. Pigmentation in the developing seed coat and seedling leaves of Brassica carinata is controlled at the dihydroflavonol reductase locus. Phytochemistry 62, 663–672 (2003).
Bharti, A. K. & Khurana, J. P. Molecular characterization of transparent testa (tt) mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Estland) impaired in flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Plant Sci. 165, 1321–1332 (2003).
Lloyd, A. et al. Advances in the MYB–bHLH–WD repeat (MBW) pigment regulatory model: addition of a wrky factor and co-option of an anthocyanin myb for betalain regulation. Plant Cell Physiol. 58, 1431–1441 (2017).
Zheng, J. et al. Determining factors, regulation system, and domestication of anthocyanin biosynthesis in rice leaves. N. Phytol. 223, 705–721 (2019).
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).
Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573–580 (1999).
Xu, Z. & Wang, H. LTR_FINDER: an efficient tool for the prediction of full-length LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W265–W268 (2007).
Pevsner J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). In: Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, USA (2004).
Yu, X., Zheng, H., Wang, J., Wang, W. & Su, B. Detecting lineage-specific adaptive evolution of brain-expressed genes in human using rhesus macaque as outgroup. Genomics 88, 745–751 (2006).
Birney, E., Clamp, M. & Durbin, R. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res. 14, 988–995 (2004).
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
Majoros, W. H., Pertea, M. & Salzberg, S. L. TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open-source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20, 2878–2879 (2004).
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinforma. 5, 59 (2004).
Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
Kovaka, S. et al. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 20, 278 (2019).
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, R7 (2008).
Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666 (2003).
McGinnis, S. & Madden, T. L. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W20–W25 (2004).
Quevillon, E. et al. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W116–W120 (2005).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997).
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arxiv, 1303.3997v2 [q-bio.GN] (2013).
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).
Takagi, H. et al. QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 74, 174–183 (2013).
Li, Y., Liu, X., Li, J., Yin, J. & Xu, X. Construction of near–infrared reflectance spectroscopy model for seed color of rapeseed. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 34, 533–536 (2012).
Wu, Y., Bhat, P. R., Close, T. J. & Lonardi, S. Efficient and accurate construction of genetic linkage maps from the minimum spanning tree of a graph. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000212 (2008).
Van Ooijen J. W. JoinMap®4, Software for the Calculation of Genetic Linkage Maps in Experimental Populations. Kyazma BV, Wageningen., (2006).
Wang S., Basten C., Zeng Z. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, (2006).
Voorrips, R. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J. Hered. 93, 77–78 (2002).
McCouch, S. et al. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genet. Newsl. 14, 111–131 (1997).
Michelmore, R. W., Paran, I. & Kesseli, R. V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88, 9828–9832 (1991).
Tan, H. et al. Enhanced seed oil production in canola by conditional expression of Brassica napus LEAFY COTYLEDON1 and LEC1-LIKE in developing seeds. Plant Physiol. 156, 1577–1588 (2011).
Liang, M., Davis, E., Gardner, D., Cai, X. & Wu, Y. Involvement of AtLAC15 in lignin synthesis in seeds and in root elongation of Arabidopsis. Planta 224, 1185–1196 (2006).
Sun, C. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly for the largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides provides insights into adaptation to fresh and brackish water. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 301–315 (2021).
Yan, P. et al. Nimble cloning: a simple, versatile, and efficient system for standardized molecular cloning. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 460 (2020).
Espley, R. V. et al. Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. Plant J. 49, 414–427 (2007).
Galli, M. et al. The DNA binding landscape of the maize AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR family. Nat. Commun. 9, 4526 (2018).
Nelson, D., Denisenko, O. & Bomsztyk, K. Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat. Protoc. 1, 179–185 (2006).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31830067, 32072093, 32272150, 32272111), Scientific Innovation 2030 Project (2022ZD0400801), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2022NSCQ-LZX0034), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA, 111 Project (B12006), Project of Chongqing Agriculture and Rural Affairs (cqnyncw-kqlhtxm), and Talent Project of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0033). H.-M.L. was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council Area of Excellence Scheme (AoE/M-403/16). S.Z. was supported by AoE/M-403/16 and the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology grants. We thank Prof. Yuanhuai Han (Shanxi Agricultural University) and Zhe Liang (Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China) for suggestions and comments, and Dr. Pu Yan (Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Haikou, China) for providing nimble cloning vectors and technical advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.Q., K.L., F.F. and J.L. designed the project. Y.N., J.L., J.L. and H.D. performed most genome sequencing and bioinformatics analyses. Z.T., Y.L., X.X., R.W., J.Y., Y.C., Q.Z. and J.L. contributed materials. C.Q., M.Z., R.H., S.C., H.Z., N.Y., F.S. and H.W. contributed to phenotyping. C.Q., Z.C., L.L., B.Y., Y.L., G.S., W.Q., Y.H., X.Y., Y.Z., S.S., and F.F. performed QTL analysis for the RIL populations. M.Z., R.H., S.C., H.Z., F.S., Z.W., X.Y. and L.W. performed the experiments. C.Q., M.Z., R.H., Y.N., C.L. and F.F. wrote the manuscript. X.Q., S.Z., H.-M.L. and H.Y. revised the manuscript and gave suggestions and comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Lixi Jiang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qu, C., Zhu, M., Hu, R. et al. Comparative genomic analyses reveal the genetic basis of the yellow-seed trait in Brassica napus. Nat Commun 14, 5194 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40838-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40838-1
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
