A significant amount of research investigations, spanning several decades, has unequivocally determined that cell death pathways, and their multi-faceted immunomodulatory activity, has major implications for health and disease [1, 2]. The role of cell death immunology is particularly impactful in the context of cancer or infection [3, 4]. Harsh conditions, resulting from infection orchestrated by pathogenic microbes (especially bacteria or viruses) or due to physicochemical stressors within tumour microenvironment (TME), induce cell death in specific target cells [5, 6]. In case of infections, such target cells predominantly consist of cells against which pathogenic microbes show specific tropism (e.g., epithelial, or immune cells) [7], or cells that die during host level-responses against the infection (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages, or T cells) [8]. In case of cancer, such target cells predominantly consist of cancer cells unable to cope with genetic instability or TME-associated stressors (e.g., hypoxia, acidosis, or nutrient-deprivation), followed by immune cells that die due to TME-associated stressors (e.g., neutrophils, dendritic cells) or cancer-driven direct induction of dysfunction or exhaustion (e.g., CD8+T cells) [6, 9, 10]. Such cell death induced due to the progression of infection or a tumour, largely supports rather than suppress, the severity of disease and patient mortality [11]. Therapeutic interventions aimed at disease amelioration also operate via induction of cell death, especially in the case of cancer, e.g., conventional cytotoxic therapies (like chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy) [12, 13], and immunotherapies (like immune checkpoint blockers [ICBs], T cell-based therapies, dendritic cell [DC] vaccines, and oncolytic viruses) [14,15,16]. Although the primary aim of therapies against infection is not orientated toward cell death induction per se, yet this could be a potential side-effect of several such modalities e.g., antibiotics or anti-viral medications [17].
Cell death has a major influence on the TME and the infected tissue, because dying/dead cells secrete or passively release an overabundance of immunomodulatory factors [18]; e.g., small metabolites including extracellular ATP or other nucleic acids and lipids [19]; cytokines like interleukin 1 beta (IL1β), tumour necrosis factor (TNF), type I interferon (IFN), IL6, IL33, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β) [20, 21]; mitochondria-associated factors like mitochondrial DNA (mitDNA) [22, 23]; chemokines like C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1), CXCL11, CXCL2, CXCL8, CXCL10, CXCL3, CXCL9, C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) [24]; and a series of danger signals or damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), like surface-exposed calreticulin (CALR) or extracellular high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) [25]. Together with the cancer-relevant or microbes-derived antigens that associate with the dying cells, and the immunological composition of the TME or site of infection, above immunomodulatory factors regulate the immunological impact of cell death on disease progression or inhibition [26]. Interestingly, a spatiotemporally defined combination of danger signals or DAMPs, cytokines or chemokines, and metabolites, emitted by dying cells can drive antigen-specific T cell immunity [16, 26]. Such immune responses can pave way for tumour regression or resolution of infection, accompanied by establishment of immunological memory against cancer or microbial antigens. This immunologically peculiar subtype of cell death has been termed either immunogenic cell death (ICD) or inflammatory cell death [16].
In recent years, substantial research has been dedicated to revealing the molecular as well as cellular pathways operating during the sensing and decoding of dying cells-associated immunomodulatory signals by innate and adaptive immune cells [27]. In “Immunology of Cell Death in Cancer and Infection” (a special issue of Genes & Immunity), a panel of leading scientists investigating immunology of cell death contributed to a discussion on mechanisms behind cell death immunology and its clinical implications.
A large volume of work on DAMPs-driven immune responses has been done in the context of cancer [28]. Just like dying cancer cells, microbes-infected stressed or dying cells can also release DAMPs that can modulate immune sensing of infected cells. However, cytokines or chemokines have received more attention in the context of infection-associated cell death rather than DAMPs [29]. In his review article [30], W.G. Land surveyed the current literature on respiratory viruses (including, coronavirus disease-19 [COVID-19]) and found that DAMPs-driven immune responses also dominated respiratory virus pathology together with cytokine-associated responses. This review concludes that DAMPs might have an underappreciated role in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (including COVID-19). The review also highlights how DAMPs might serve the purpose of diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for such infections. This review is very timely because, a recent single-cell resolution analyses of lung-associated bronchoalveolar fluid from patients with severe COVID-19, found that COVID-19 associated lung pathology was associated with considerable release of extracellular ATP [31]. Accordingly, genetic signatures of purinergic and inflammasome signalling (that is downstream of extracellular ATP) were enriched across various lung-associated immune compartments [31].
In the context of cancer, DAMPs form the cornerstone of the ICD concept. Over the past decade, while ICBs have worked really well against T cell-infiltrated tumours yet they have repeatedly failed against various T cell-depleted tumours like glioblastoma (GBM). Such failures have fuelled an interest in exploiting ICD to overcome cancers like GBM. In their review article [32], Decraene and co-authors (Steven De Vleeschouwer’s lab) discuss how GBM can benefit from ICD-based therapies capable of stimulating anti-GBM immunity. The authors describe the major mechanisms behind ICD and its preclinical as well as clinical implications for GBM. Notwithstanding such remarkable advancements accomplished over the past decade, the clinical translation of ICD-based immunotherapy still remains a major challenge. In their original contribution [33], Van Gool, and co-workers (Wilfried Steucker-led clinical center) describe interesting clinical observations pertaining to an immunotherapy regimen combining IO-Vac® vaccine (tumour lysate-pulsed DCs, matured via IL-6, TNF, and IL-1β, as well as Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV)), with ICD-induced NDV therapy, and local electro-hyperthermia, administered to the GBM patients. They observed that their multi-modal immunotherapy regimen by itself had similar clinical performance as standard-of-care therapy involving temozolomide (TMZ). However, the combination of both TMZ as well as the multi-modal immunotherapy significantly improved overall survival of the GBM patients. This observation deserves more clinical validation in better designed clinical trials.
Beyond DAMPs and ICD, there is an urgent need to identify novel regulators of other danger signalling pathways [34]. In their original contribution [35], Liang and colleagues (Buzukela Abuduaini’s lab) reported that overexpression of RALY, a multifunctional RNA-binding protein, induced upregulation of genes relevant for NOD-like receptor signalling while causing inhibition of type I IFN signalling, which ultimately associated with decrease in proliferation of cancer cells. Further research is required in the future to reveal translational impact of signalling proteins like RALY for cell death immunology.
Finally, in the context of a tumour, induction of cancer cell death is obviously a top priority from the perspective of disease amelioration [36]. However with the clinical success of cancer immunotherapy, cell death of CD8+T cells has also come into focus since this can be debilitating for the success of immunotherapies that rely on their activation for anti-cancer efficacy [37]. However, while this concept is pre-clinically well established yet its clinical existence is not always demonstrated. In their original contribution [38], Vanmeerbeek and co-authors (Abhishek D. Garg’s lab) applied integrated computational immunology approaches to bulk-tumour transcriptomic and single-cell (sc)RNAseq data from melanoma patients in clinical studies applying ICBs. They found that stem-like memory CD8+/CD4+T cells that predicted superior patient response to ICB-treatment, also enriched for signatures of cell death/apoptosis resistance. In fact, these distinguishing characteristics were together necessary for predicting clinical responses to anti-PD1 ICB, after the melanoma patients had previously progressed on anti-CTLA4 ICB.
In summary, this special issue of Genes & Immunity emphasizes the importance of exploring cell death immunology from multiple perspectives (e.g., target cells vs. immune cells, disease subtypes, type of therapies), and highlights the importance of context behind the disease promoting or inhibiting impacts of cell death pathways. One area that still needs more attention than it is currently getting, is biomarkers related to cell death immunology that are still largely lacking for most diseases.
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Kist M, Vucic D. Cell death pathways: intricate connections and disease implications. EMBO J. 2021;40:e106700.
Green DR. The coming decade of cell death research: five riddles. Cell. 2019;177:1094–107.
Kroemer G, Galassi C, Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L. Immunogenic cell stress and death. Nat Immunol. 2022;23:487–500.
Sharma D, Kanneganti T-D. Inflammatory cell death in intestinal pathologies. Immunol Rev. 2017;280:57–73.
Long JS, Ryan KM. New frontiers in promoting tumour cell death: targeting apoptosis, necroptosis and autophagy. Oncogene. 2012;31:5045–60.
Giraldo NA, Sanchez-Salas R, Peske JD, Vano Y, Becht E, Petitprez F, et al. The clinical role of the TME in solid cancer. Br J Cancer. 2019;120:45–53.
Labbé K, Saleh M. Cell death in the host response to infection. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1339–49.
Osbron CA, Goodman AG. To die or not to die: programmed cell death responses and their interactions with Coxiella burnetii infection. Mol Microbiol. 2022;117:717–36.
Laureano RS, Sprooten J, Vanmeerbeerk I, Borras DM, Govaerts J, Naulaerts S, et al. Trial watch: dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy for cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2022;11:2096363.
Murgaski A, Kiss M, Van Damme H, Kancheva D, Vanmeerbeek I, Keirsse J, et al. Efficacy of CD40 agonists is mediated by distinct cDC subsets and subverted by suppressive macrophages. Cancer Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-0094.
Grimm S, Noteborn M. Anticancer genes: inducers of tumour-specific cell death signalling. Trends Mol Med. 2010;16:88–96.
Coffelt SB, de Visser KE. Immune-mediated mechanisms influencing the efficacy of anticancer therapies. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:198–216.
Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:486–541.
Hensler M, Rakova J, Kasikova L, Lanickova T, Pasulka J, Holicek P, et al. Peripheral gene signatures reveal distinct cancer patient immunotypes with therapeutic implications for autologous DC-based vaccines. Oncoimmunology. 2022;11:2101596.
Bassez A, Vos H, Van Dyck L, Floris G, Arijs I, Desmedt C, et al. A single-cell map of intratumoral changes during anti-PD1 treatment of patients with breast cancer. Nat Med. 2021;27:820–32.
Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Warren S, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, Martinez AB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death. J Immunother Cancer. 2020; 8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000337.
Yapasert R, Khaw-On P, Banjerdpongchai R. Coronavirus infection-associated cell death signaling and potential therapeutic targets. Molecules. 2021;26. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247459.
Griffith TS, Ferguson TA. Cell death in the maintenance and abrogation of tolerance: the five Ws of dying cells. Immunity. 2011;35:456–66.
Iessi E, Marconi M, Manganelli V, Sorice M, Malorni W, Garofalo T, et al. On the role of sphingolipids in cell survival and death. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2020;351:149–95.
Meng X-M, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. TGF-β: the master regulator of fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:325–38.
Sprooten J, Vankerckhoven A, Vanmeerbeek I, Borras DM, Berckmans Y, Wouters R, et al. Peripherally-driven myeloid NFkB and IFN/ISG responses predict malignancy risk, survival, and immunotherapy regime in ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-003609.
Khodarev NN. Intracellular RNA sensing in mammalian cells: role in stress response and cancer therapies. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2019;344:31–89.
Medler T, Patel JM, Alice A, Baird JR, Hu H-M, Gough MJ. Activating the nucleic acid-sensing machinery for anticancer immunity. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2019;344:173–214.
Garg AD, Agostinis P. Cell death and immunity in cancer: From danger signals to mimicry of pathogen defense responses. Immunol Rev. 2017;280:126–48.
Yamazaki T, Galluzzi L. Mitochondrial control of innate immune signaling by irradiated cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1797292.
Garg AD, Galluzzi L, Apetoh L, Baert T, Birge RB, Bravo-San Pedro JM, et al. Molecular and translational classifications of damps in immunogenic cell death. Front Immunol. 2015;6:588.
Lu JV, Chen HC, Walsh CM. Necroptotic signaling in adaptive and innate immunity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;35:33–39.
Fang S, Agostinis P, Salven P, Garg AD. Decoding cancer cell death-driven immune cell recruitment: an in vivo method for site-of-vaccination analyses. Meth Enzymol. 2020;636:185–207.
Wauters E, Thevissen K, Wouters C, Bosisio FM, De Smet F, Gunst J, et al. Establishing a unified COVID-19 “Immunome”: integrating coronavirus pathogenesis and host immunopathology. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1642.
Land WG. Role of DAMPs in respiratory virus-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome-with a preliminary reference to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Genes Immun. 2021;22:141–60.
Wauters E, Van Mol P, Garg AD, Jansen S, Van Herck Y, Vanderbeke L, et al. Discriminating mild from critical COVID-19 by innate and adaptive immune single-cell profiling of bronchoalveolar lavages. Cell Res. 2021;0:1–19.
Decraene B, Yang Y, De Smet F, Garg AD, Agostinis P, De Vleeschouwer S. Immunogenic cell death and its therapeutic or prognostic potential in high-grade glioma. Genes Immun. 2022;23:1–11.
Van Gool SW, Makalowski J, Bitar M, Van de Vliet P, Schirrmacher V, Stuecker W. Synergy between TMZ and individualized multimodal immunotherapy to improve overall survival of IDH1 wild-type MGMT promoter-unmethylated GBM patients. Genes Immun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-022-00162-y.
Sprooten J, Garg AD. Type I interferons and endoplasmic reticulum stress in health and disease. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2020;350:63–118.
Liang Z, Rehati A, Husaiyin E, Chen D, Jiyuan Z, Abuduaini B. RALY regulate the proliferation and expression of immune/inflammatory response genes via alternative splicing of FOS. Genes Immun. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-022-00178-4.
Sprooten J, De Wijngaert P, Vanmeerbeerk I, Martin S, Vangheluwe P, Schlenner S, et al. Necroptosis in immuno-oncology and cancer immunotherapy. Cells. 2020; 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081823.
Naulaerts S, Borras DM, Martinez AA, Messiaen J, Van Herck Y, Gelens L, et al. Immunogenomic, single-cell and spatial dissection of CD8+T cell exhaustion reveals critical determinants of cancer immunotherapy. BioRxiv. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.468617.
Vanmeerbeek I, Borras DM, Sprooten J, Bechter O, Tejpar S, Garg AD. Early memory differentiation and cell death resistance in T cells predicts melanoma response to sequential anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 immunotherapy. Genes Immun. 2021;22:108–119.
Acknowledgements
Research in ADG lab is supported by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (Fundamental Research Grant, G0B4620N; Excellence of Science/EOS grant, 30837538, for ‘DECODE’ consortium), KU Leuven (C1 grant, C14/19/098; C3 grant, C3/21/037; and POR award funds, POR/16/040), Kom op Tegen Kanker (KOTK/2018/11509/1; and KOTK/2019/11955/1) and VLIR-UOS (iBOF grant, iBOF/21/048, for ‘MIMICRY’ consortium to ADG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Abhishek D. Garg received consulting/advisory/lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany), Miltenyi Biotec (Germany), Novigenix (Switzerland), and IsoPlexis (USA).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garg, A.D. Immunology of cell death in cancer and infection. Genes Immun 23, 241–243 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-022-00184-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41435-022-00184-6