Abstract
The increasing incidence of urothelial bladder cancer is a notable global concern, as evidenced by the epidemiological data in terms of frequency, distribution, as well as mortality rates. Although numerous molecular alterations have been linked to the occurrence and progression of bladder cancer, currently there is a limited knowledge on the molecular signature able of accurately predicting clinical outcomes. In this report, we present a case of a pT3b high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma with areas of squamous differentiation characterized by very high tumor mutational burden (TMB), with up-regulations of immune checkpoints. The high TMB, along with elevated expressions of PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD1, underscores the rationale for developing a personalized immunotherapy focused on the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Additionally, molecular analysis revealed somatic mutations in several other cancer-related genes, including TP53, TP63 and NOTCH3. Mutations of TP53 and TP63 genes provide mechanistic insights on the molecular mechanisms underlying disease development and progression. Notably, the above-mentioned mutations and the elevated hypoxia score make the targeting of p53 and/or hypoxia related pathways a plausible personalized medicine option for this bladder cancer, particularly in combination with immunotherapy. Our data suggest a requirement for molecular profiling in bladder cancer to possibly select appropriate immune-checkpoint therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The incidence of urothelial bladder cancer represents a significant global concern, with ever alarming epidemiological data, highlighting its relevance in terms of frequency, distribution, and mortality rates. According to the current statistics, there were over 550,000 new cases and 220,000 deaths of bladder cancer worldwide in 2020, with a substantial impact on public health [1]. Epidemiological analysis reveals significant variations in incidence rates geographically with higher incidence in Europe and North America [2], emphasizing the importance of a detailed assessment of urothelial bladder carcinoma distribution to adopt targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies. From the pathology perspective, urothelial bladder cancer present the most frequent histological type; more rare are the other type such as squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasms [3, 4].
Recently, the integration of molecular analysis has significantly enriched our understanding of bladder cancer, enabling the identification of predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Mutations in the TP53 gene [5,6,7] and amplifications of the ERBB2 gene [8,9,10] have been shown to influence treatment response and prognosis. For instance, patients with specific mutations may have greater benefit from targeted therapies, paving the way for a more personalized approach to bladder cancer management. These molecular-based evidence facilitated the identification of distinct subgroups, each with varying prognostic implications [3, 11, 12]. Molecular subgroups, based on gene expression, exhibit enrichment for specific immunohistochemical phenotypes, distinct genetic profile, as well as immunological patterns. Luminal-papillary subtype shows a higher frequency of FGFR3 mutations, while luminal-unstable basal-squamous, or neuroendocrine-like subtypes are more prone to show TP53 mutations. From a therapeutic standpoint, deregulation of DNA damage repair genes or ERCC2 seems to be correlated with a more positive outcome when treated with cisplatin [13]. Additionally, mutations, amplifications, and fusions involving FGFR3 may be associated with responsiveness to therapy targeting FGFR [14, 15]. The in-depth analysis of molecular features in the context of urothelial bladder cancer reveals additional crucial details for more accurate and personalized disease management. Among the relevant molecular parameters, Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) [16], chromosomal instability [17], and the expression of immune checkpoints play a central role in patient stratification and in defining therapeutic options. TMB, measured as the total number of genetic mutations in the genome of a tumor cell, has emerged as a predictive indicator of response to immunotherapies. Patients with high TMB are more likely to benefit from therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibition, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies [18]. In the context of bladder cancer, TMB evaluation can provide valuable insights into the potential success of specific immunotherapies [16]. Furthermore, the analysis of immune checkpoint expression, particularly PD-1 and PD-L1, adds crucial information about the immune status of the tumor and its ability to evade the immune system’s response. Bladder tumors expressing high levels of PD-L1 can be ideal targets for immunotherapy, with the potential to enhance the immune response against tumor cells. The integration of TMB, chromosomal instability, and immune checkpoint expression in the molecular analysis of bladder cancer significantly enhances our understanding of the disease. These molecular parameters not only offer more precise diagnostic information but also guide therapeutic choices, opening new perspectives in the personalization of urinary bladder cancer management.
However, at the current state of the art, there is no molecular signature capable of accurately predicting the clinical outcome of urothelial bladder cancers.
In this case report, we describe a case of urothelial bladder cancer with uncommon genomic characteristics. These include a very high TMB, numerous somatic mutations in cancer-related genes, and up-regulation of immune checkpoints, demonstrating the importance of a multi-omics analysis in bladder cancer patients.
Case presentation and discussion
An 83-year-old female patient with a urothelial neoformation of 80 × 75 × 50 mm allowed histological investigations which classified the lesions as high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma with areas of squamous differentiation, as demonstrated by p40 positivity in immunohistochemistry. The neoplasia infiltrated the wall throughout its thickness, as well as the peri-vesical adipose tissue. Extensively ulcerated areas with associated necrosis were observed. No metastatic lymph nodes were detected. According to the TNM classification, the tumor was staged as pT3b. In addition to p40, immunohistochemical analysis showed a significant positivity for GATA3 or p63. The absence of p16 staining ruled out the involvement of HPV infection in the carcinogenesis.
Multi-omics investigations revealed a very high TMB (Fig. 1A), no microsatellite instability (Fig. 1B) and low chromosomal copy number heterogeneity (Fig. 1C). Large chromosomal amplifications (>90% of the chromosome arm) in 1q, 2p, 3q, 7q and deletions in 8p, 9q and 17p (Fig. 1D), recently associated to the metastatic potential of uroepithelial tumors [19], have been identified. As compared to the control cohort, the TMB value showed more than a 5-fold increase over the average value (Fig. 1A). TMB has currently considered as a reliable biomarker capable of predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, mainly anti PD-L1 approaches, in several solid tumors [20,21,22,23,24].
The gene expression analysis also reveals up-regulations of the immune checkpoints PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD1 (PD-1: log2FC = 1.67, PD-L1: log2FC = 4 and PD-L2: log2FC = 2.86) in the analyzed bladder lesion as compared to both normal counterpart and the background cohort of 66 cancer lesions (Fig. 2A). No deregulation of expression was observed for CTLA-4 (Fig. 2A). The concurrent high values of TMB, along with elevated expressions of PD-L1, PD-L2, and PD1, offer clinical evidence for supporting the development of tailored therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors [25]. Currently, immunotherapy is a suitable initial treatment for individuals with advanced bladder carcinoma who cannot be treated with chemotherapy using platinum, independently of their immune-checkpoints expression profile [26]. Additionally, for cisplatin-ineligible patientsbut exhibiting high immune-checkpoints expression, immunotherapy could be contemplated as a first-line strategy [27]. More commonly, immunotherapies in bladder cancer are contemplated as second-line strategy for cases with no response, resistance to platinum and were not treated before with immunotherapy [26]. In this scenario, the use of individualized genetic profiles of tumors, as highlighted in this report, will persist in guiding the development of more tailored treatments that are not only better tolerated but also potentially more cost-effective when compared to classical chemotherapy. Whilst the selection of specific immune checkpoint inhibitors remains a topic of debate, significant advantages can be gained from a more detailed molecular profiling analysis of the tumor. As new agents, including the use of antibody-drug conjugates like, continue to be developed and tested, offering plausible perspective to increase bladder cancer treatment options [28,29,30].
Mutational analysis of our case revealed distinct somatic variations in several cancer related genes (Table 1) such as TP53, TP63, NOTCH3, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, MTAP (see Supplementary Fig. 1).
The mutations reported herein in both TP53 and TP63 genes can provide new insights into the underlying mechanisms involved in the development and progression of the disease. TP53, a major onco-suppressor transcription factor, with its family members, is able to directly regulate cell cycle progression [31, 32], metabolic changes [33, 34] and cell death [7] thus preventing the formation of tumors including urothelial bladder cancer [35, 36]. Tumors with mutations in TP53 gene often exhibit accelerated progression, show limited responsiveness to anticancer treatments, such as chemotherapy, and are associated with an unfavorable prognosis [37, 38]. TP63, belonging to the p53 gene family together with p73, encodes different proteins capable of either activating p53-responsive genes or acting as a dominant-negative factor against p53 [39]. p63 shows a vital function in the typical development and upkeep of the human urothelium [40]. However, regarding bladder carcinoma, the impact of mutations in the p63 gene remains controversial for the scanty information available. While certain studies have reported a decrease in muscle-invasive tumors [41], others have shown persistent, retained expression associated with biological aggressiveness, implying a possible involvement in tumor progression [42]. However, the prospect of better understanding the role of p53 and p63 in cancer progression emerges as a potential appealing future strategy for several solid cancers [43].
Dysregulation of Notch3 has been associated with numerous cancers [44, 45], impacting tumor aggressiveness, maintenance, and resistance to chemotherapy [46,47,48]. In addition, studies found that NOTCH3 can have a role in orchestrating antitumoral activity by inducing the expression of PD-1 [49, 50]. According to this, mutations in NOTCH3 could be related to the high immune-checkpoint expression observed in our urothelial bladder cancer thus facilitating immune cancer escape. Notably, Notch3 plays a role in regulating p53 at a post-transcriptional level, thereby regulating Cyclin-G1 expression [51]. In more specific terms, the reduction of Cyclin-G1 in cells Notch3 knockdown leads to a substantial increase in p53 protein expression. Consequently, the accumulated p53 in Notch3-depleted cells triggers an overexpression of miR-221, resulting in enhanced p53 stability. In this context, mutations in the NOTCH3 gene may contribute to the dysregulation of p53/p63 molecules as described below. The increasing understanding of the role of the NOTCH family in cancer has heightened interest in targeting Notch molecules therapeutically. This interest extends to both single-agent approaches and multimolecular-targeted strategies. Recent investigation on Notch signaling has led to the emergence of more specific therapeutic strategies for inhibiting Notch, including for example: (i) inhibition of the nuclear transcriptional Notch coactivator (ii) neutralization with monoclonal antibodies, or receptor decoys, of the ligand–receptor interaction (iii) use small molecular GSIs to inhibit the proteolytic cleavage/activation of the receptor [52, 53]. However, at the current state of the art, there are no clinical trials specifically addressing the use of targeted therapies in NOTCH3-mutated cancers. Currently, NOTCH3 mutations serve as inclusion eligibility criteria for clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the following anti-cancer treatments: Al101, abemaciclib, carboplatin, cisplatin, and crenigacestat [54].
The molecular characteristics of the clinical case reported here also include the identification of mutational signatures in bladder cancers: almost all detected mutations contribute to signatures 2 and 13 (Fig. 2B). These signatures are present in more than 70% of bladder cancers [55]. Such molecular signatures are commonly associated with APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis, which is linked to the activity of base excision repair and DNA replication machineries [55] opening the possibility for the use of biological therapies such as ATR inhibitors [56].
The identification of very high hypoxia signature scores (Fig. 3A), as well as the up-regulation of HIF-1α and MKI67 (Fig. 3A, B), assessed by gene expression analysis, adds another layer of complexity to the case. Indeed, hypoxia in bladder cancer is linked the initiation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a biological phenomenon associated to cancer metastasis [57,58,59,60], suppression of apoptosis [61,62,63,64], and the advancement of cancer. Its negative impact on immunotherapy is notable, as it modifies molecular markers, immune cell movement, and angiogenesis, leading to immunosuppression via a HIF-1-dependent signature [65]. Thus, high hypoxia levels are associated with an unfavorable prognosis in bladder cancer [66]. In this context, hypoxia can influence the function of p53 in a manner that is dependent on the specific context [66,67,68,69,70]. In particular, hypoxia might induce inhibitory interactors of p53, including murine double minute 4 (MDM4) or MDM2, resulting in a lower p53 steady state protein level. Moreover, HIF-1α plays a role in transcriptionally activating targets that facilitate the proteasomal elimination of homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2), that normally should phosphorylate and, hence, activate the function of p53 [71]. As a result, all these concerted actions are able to significantly reduce the function of p53, that reducing programmed cell death and allowing tumor cells to grow.
Paradoxically, hypoxia condition can also result in the stabilization and activation of p53, leading to enhanced protein steady state levels which, in turn, allows the activation of secondary transcriptional target genes able to regulate DNA damage response, programmed cell death and cell cycle arrest [72]. Interestingly, the extent of p53 stabilization caused by the hypoxic microenvironment appears to be directly related to the extent hypoxia, with more pronounced effects observed under conditions of profound compared to mild hypoxia. The presence of mutations in the TP53 and NOTCH3 genes and the observed high hypoxia score, targeting p53 and/or hypoxia represent a personalized medicine option for the profiled bladder cancer. This could be especially relevant in combination with immunotherapy, given the observed high expression levels of PDL-1, PDL-2, and PD1and high TMB [73, 74].
Conclusion
In the era of 4 P (Predictive, Personalized, Preventive and Participatory) medicine [75,76,77,78], the molecular profiling of single cancer entity represents a great opportunity for the development of patient-tailored therapies. Hence, this case report highlights the complex molecular landscape of an infiltrating urothelial bladder cancer characterized by very high TMB. In particular, multi-omics investigations revealed a peculiar molecular profile including alterations in genes and pathways related to cancer progression such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors, hypoxia, TP53, TP63 and NOTCH3. The detailed molecular characterization of this case emphasizes the potential for personalized medicine in bladder cancer treatment paving the way for targeted therapies.
Methods
Collection of samples
Tumour tissues collection was performed using standardized protocol aimed at preventing cold ischemia until freezing in liquid nitrogen [79,80,81]. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained serial sections were used for pathological quality control (QC). Inclusion criteria for tumour samples collection: tumor content of >=30%; Necrosis <=30%; presence of invasive tumour cells. Adjacent normal tissues were also collected. Protein lysate preparation and nucleic acid extraction were performed by using 10 mg of each collected tissue [82,83,84,85]. The tissues stay frozen during the entire process.
For histological and immunohistochemical analysis, serial sections from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks were used [82, 86,87,88]. Histological analysis was conducted by two independent pathologists on H&E-stained slides. Serial sections were used to study the expression of the main relevant prognostic and predictive biomarkers of bladder cancer by immunohistochemistry including p63, p40, p16 and GATA3 [89]. Immunohistochemical reactions were performed by using the automated Leica Bond IHC platform (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL) with the following primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-p63 (clone 7JUL; pre-diluted; Leica Biosystems), mouse monoclonal anti-p40 (clone BC28; pre-diluted; Leica Biosystems), mouse monoclonal anti-p16 (clone 6H12; pre-diluted; Leica Biosystems) and mouse monoclonal anti-GATA3 (clone L50-823; pre-diluted; Leica Biosystems).
Nucleic acid extraction and quality assessment
As previously described, frozen tissue slices were used for nucleic acid extraction and quality assessment [35].
Library preparation and NGS sequencing
Libraries for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole transcriptome sequencing were performed as previously described [90, 91].
NGS data processing
To align NGS data, Grch38 genome assembly was used as reference. As concern the normal samples, the Haplotype Caller from the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) was used for both identification and annotation of short genomic variations. WGS somatic variations were called using a consensus of Mutect2 [92], Strelka [93], Varscan [94] and Somatic Sniper [95]. Structural variations were called using R packages TitanCNA [96], DellyCNV and DellyCall [97], as well as Manta [98]. RNA-Seq differential expression was based on normalized readcount data (TPM: transcripts per million).
Bioinformatical analyses
Mutational signatures were calculated using the R package MutationalPatterns [99,100,101,102]. MSI classification was done using R package MSIseq [103]. Metrices to define chromosomal instability were determined using R package CINmetrics [104] and CNHplus [105]. Aneuploidy events were analysed using ASCETS [106]. Aneuploidy event span more than 90% of the chromosome. Visualization of results was done in IGV [107]. TMB was calculated as the number of non-synonymous mutations of protein coding genes divided by exome size in Megabases.
Data availability
The data will be made available upon reasonable request.
References
https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow, accessed [28th February 2024].
Jubber I, Ong S, Bukavina L, Black PC, Compérat E, Kamat AM, et al. Epidemiology of bladder cancer in 2023: a systematic review of risk factors. Eur Urol. 2023;84:176–90.
Kamoun A, de Reyniès A, Allory Y, Sjödahl G, Robertson AG, Seiler R, et al. A consensus molecular classification of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2020;77:420–33.
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, et al. European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81:75–94.
Dyrskjøt L, Hansel DE, Efstathiou JA, Knowles MA, Galsky MD, Teoh J, et al. Bladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2023;9:58.
McClure MB, Kogure Y, Ansari-Pour N, Saito Y, Chao HH, Shepherd J, et al. Landscape of genetic alterations underlying hallmark signature changes in cancer reveals TP53 aneuploidy-driven metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Res Commun. 2023;3:281–96.
Panatta E, Butera A, Celardo I, Leist M, Melino G, Amelio I. p53 regulates expression of nuclear envelope components in cancer cells. Biol Direct. 2022;17:38.
Patelli G, Zeppellini A, Spina F, Righetti E, Stabile S, Amatu A, et al. The evolving panorama of HER2-targeted treatments in metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;104:102351.
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315–22.
Lindskrog SV, Prip F, Lamy P, Taber A, Groeneveld CS, Birkenkamp-Demtröder K, et al. An integrated multi-omics analysis identifies prognostic molecular subtypes of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2301.
Compérat E, Amin MB, Cathomas R, Choudhury A, De Santis M, Kamat A, et al. Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments. Lancet. 2022;400:1712–21.
Li Q, Damish AW, Frazier Z, Liu D, Reznichenko E, et al. ERCC2 helicase domain mutations confer nucleotide excision repair deficiency and drive cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:977–88.
Börcsök J, Sztupinszki Z, Bekele R, Gao SP, Diossy M, Samant AS, et al. Identification of a synthetic lethal relationship between nucleotide excision repair deficiency and irofulven sensitivity in urothelial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:2011–22.
Jing W, Wang G, Cui Z, Xiong G, Jiang X, Li Y, et al. FGFR3 destabilizes PD-L1 via NEDD4 to control T-cell-mediated bladder cancer immune surveillance. Cancer Res. 2022;82:114–29.
Ouyang Y, Ou Z, Zhong W, Yang J, Fu S, Ouyang N, et al. FGFR3 alterations in bladder cancer stimulate serine synthesis to induce immune-inert macrophages that suppress T-cell recruitment and activation. Cancer Res. 2023;83:4030–46.
Chan TA, Yarchoan M, Jaffee E, Swanton C, Quezada SA, Stenzinger A, et al. Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:44–56.
Panatta E, Butera A, Mammarella E, Pitolli C, Mauriello A, Leist M, et al. Metabolic regulation by p53 prevents R-loop-associated genomic instability. Cell Rep. 2022;41:111568.
Cristescu R, Mogg R, Ayers M, Albright A, Murphy E, Yearley J, et al. Pan-tumor genomic biomarkers for PD-1 checkpoint blockade-based immunotherapy. Science. 2018;362:eaar3593.
Spasova V, Mladenov B, Rangelov S, Hammoudeh Z, Nesheva D, Serbezov D, et al. Clinical impact of copy number variation changes in bladder cancer samples. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22:901.
Scimeca M, Bonfiglio R, Urbano N, Cerroni C, Anemona L, Montanaro M, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in prostate cancer cells is associated with deep changes of the tumor inflammatory infiltrate composition. Urol Oncol. 2019;37:297.e19–e31.
Bonfiglio R, Nardozi D, Scimeca M, Cerroni C, Mauriello A, Bonanno E. PD-L1 in immune-escape of breast and prostate cancers: from biology to therapy. Future Oncol. 2017;13:2129–31.
Shah MA, Kennedy EB, Alarcon-Rozas AE, Alcindor T, Bartley AN, Malowany AB, et al. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced gastroesophageal cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:1470–91.
Topalian SL, Taube JM, Pardoll DM. Neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2020;367:eaax0182.
Salomé B, Sfakianos JP, Ranti D, Daza J, Bieber C, Charap A, et al. NKG2A and HLA-E define an alternative immune checkpoint axis in bladder cancer. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:1027–43.e9.
Jung J, Heo YJ, Park S. High tumor mutational burden predicts favorable response to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in patients with solid tumor: a real-world pan-tumor analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 2023;11:e006454.
Patel VG, Oh WK, Galsky MD. Treatment of muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer in 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:404–23.
Rhea LP, Mendez-Marti S, Kim D, Aragon-Ching JB. Role of immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;26:100296.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04223856, accessed [28th February 2024].
Challita-Eid PM, Satpayev D, Yang P, An Z, Morrison K, Shostak Y, et al. Enfortumab vedotin antibody-drug conjugate targeting nectin-4 is a highly potent therapeutic agent in multiple preclinical cancer models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3003–13.
Klümper N, Ralser DJ, Ellinger J, Roghmann F, Albrecht J, Below E, et al. Membranous NECTIN-4 expression frequently decreases during metastatic spread of urothelial carcinoma and is associated with enfortumab vedotin resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2023;29:1496–505.
Amelio I, Mancini M, Petrova V, Cairns RA, Vikhreva P, Nicolai S, et al. p53 mutants cooperate with HIF-1 in transcriptional regulation of extracellular matrix components to promote tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10869–78.
Melino G, Memmi EM, Pelicci PG, Bernassola F. Maintaining epithelial stemness with p63. Sci Signal. 2015;8:re9.
Amelio I, Markert EK, Rufini A, Antonov AV, Sayan BS, Tucci P, et al. p73 regulates serine biosynthesis in cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33:5039–46.
Oberst A, Malatesta M, Aqeilan RI, Rossi M, Salomoni P, Murillas R, et al. The Nedd4-binding partner 1 (N4BP1) protein is an inhibitor of the E3 ligase Itch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:11280–5.
Ciccarese C, Massari F, Blanca A, Tortora G, Montironi R, Cheng L, et al. Tp53 and its potential therapeutic role as a target in bladder cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21:401–14.
Candi E, Oddi S, Paradisi A, Terrinoni A, Ranalli M, Teofoli P, et al. Expression of transglutaminase 5 in normal and pathologic human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119:670–7.
Thiel KW, Devor EJ, Filiaci VL, Mutch D, Moxley K, Alvarez Secord A, et al. TP53 sequencing and p53 immunohistochemistry predict outcomes when bevacizumab is added to frontline chemotherapy in endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:3289–300.
Lew TE, Minson A, Dickinson M, Handunnetti SM, Blombery P, Khot A, et al. Treatment approaches for patients with TP53-mutated mantle cell lymphoma. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10:e142–54.
Melino G, Lu X, Gasco M, Crook T, Knight RA. Functional regulation of p73 and p63: development and cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:663–70.
Ramal M, Corral S, Kalisz M, Lapi E, Real FX. The urothelial gene regulatory network: understanding biology to improve bladder cancer management. Oncogene. 2024;43:1–21.
Koga F, Kawakami S, Fujii Y, Saito K, Ohtsuka Y, Iwai A, et al. Impaired p63 expression associates with poor prognosis and uroplakin III expression in invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:5501–7.
Choi W, Shah JB, Tran M, Svatek R, Marquis L, Lee IL, et al. p63 expression defines a lethal subset of muscle-invasive bladder cancers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30206.
Cappello A, Tosetti G, Smirnov A, Ganini C, Yang X, Shi Y, et al. p63 orchestrates serine and one carbon metabolism enzymes expression in head and neck cancer. Biol Direct. 2023;18:73.
Brahim S, Negulescu AM, Geneste C, Schott T, Lin S, Morel LO, et al. Notch3 regulates Mybl2 via HeyL to limit proliferation and tumor initiation in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:171.
Zhang YQ, Liang YK, Wu Y, Chen M, Chen WL, Li RH, et al. Notch3 inhibits cell proliferation and tumorigenesis and predicts better prognosis in breast cancer through transactivating PTEN. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:502.
Xiu M, Wang Y, Li B, Wang X, Xiao F, Chen S, et al. The role of Notch3 signaling in cancer stemness and chemoresistance: molecular mechanisms and targeting strategies. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:694141.
Wang W, Chen D, Zhu K. SOX2OT variant 7 contributes to the synergistic interaction between EGCG and Doxorubicin to kill osteosarcoma via autophagy and stemness inhibition. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:37.
Jeong JY, Kang H, Kim TH, Kim G, Heo JH, Kwon AY, et al. MicroRNA-136 inhibits cancer stem cell activity and enhances the anti-tumor effect of paclitaxel against chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells by targeting Notch3. Cancer Lett. 2017;386:168–78.
Mathieu M, Cotta-Grand N, Daudelin JF, Thébault P, Labrecque N. Notch signaling regulates PD-1 expression during CD8(+) T-cell activation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91:82–8.
Wang M, Zhao J, Zhang L, Wei F, Lian Y, Wu Y, et al. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J Cancer. 2017;8:761–73.
Giovannini C, Minguzzi M, Baglioni M, Fornari F, Giannone F, Ravaioli M, et al. Suppression of p53 by Notch3 is mediated by Cyclin G1 and sustained by MDM2 and miR-221 axis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10607–20.
Teoh SL, Das S. Notch signalling pathways and their importance in the treatment of cancers. Curr Drug Targets. 2018;19:128–43.
Pagliaro L, Marchesini M, Roti G. Targeting oncogenic Notch signaling with SERCA inhibitors. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:8.
https://www.mycancergenome.org/content/gene/notch3/#ref-4, accessed [28th February 2024].
Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–21.
Brady SW, Gout AM, Zhang J. Therapeutic and prognostic insights from the analysis of cancer mutational signatures. Trends Genet. 2022;38:194–208.
Scimeca M, Urbano N, Bonfiglio R, Duggento A, Toschi N, Schillaci O, et al. Novel insights into breast cancer progression and metastasis: a multidisciplinary opportunity to transition from biology to clinical oncology. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019;1872:138–48.
Scimeca M, Bonfiglio R, Varone F, Ciuffa S, Mauriello A, Bonanno E. Calcifications in prostate cancer: an active phenomenon mediated by epithelial cells with osteoblast-phenotype. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81:745–8.
Scimeca M, Giocondo R, Montanaro M, Granaglia A, Bonfiglio R, Tancredi V, et al. BMP-2 variants in breast epithelial to mesenchymal transition and microcalcifications origin. Cells. 2020;9:1381.
Bonfiglio R, Sisto R, Casciardi S, Palumbo V, Scioli MP, Giacobbi E, et al. Aluminium bioaccumulation in colon cancer, impinging on epithelial-mesenchymal-transition and cell death. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168335.
Vitale I, Pietrocola F, Guilbaud E, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, et al. Apoptotic cell death in disease-current understanding of the NCCD 2023. Cell Death Differ. 2023;30:1097–154.
Hou P, Fang J, Liu Z, Shi Y, Agostini M, Bernassola F, et al. Macrophage polarization and metabolism in atherosclerosis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:691.
Lodhi T, Song YP, West C, Hoskin P, Choudhury A. Hypoxia and its modification in bladder cancer: current and future perspectives. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radio). 2021;33:376–90.
Zhang Z, Li Q, Li A, Wang F, Li Z, Meng Y, et al. Identifying a hypoxia related score to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer: a study with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10:4353–64.
Augustin RC, Delgoffe GM, Najjar YG. Characteristics of the tumor microenvironment that influence immune cell functions: hypoxia, oxidative stress, metabolic alterations. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:3802.
Fan P, Zhang N, Candi E, Agostini M, Piacentini M, TOR Centre. et al. Alleviating hypoxia to improve cancer immunotherapy. Oncogene. 2023;42:3591–604.
Priami C, Montariello D, De Michele G, Ruscitto F, Polazzi A, Ronzoni S, et al. Aberrant activation of p53/p66Shc-mInsc axis increases asymmetric divisions and attenuates proliferation of aged mammary stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:2429–44.
Lindström MS, Bartek J, Maya-Mendoza A. p53 at the crossroad of DNA replication and ribosome biogenesis stress pathways. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:972–82.
Levine AJ. Exploring the future of research in the Tp53 field. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:893–4.
El-Saafin F, Bergamasco MI, Chen Y, May RE, Esakky P, Hediyeh-Zadeh S, et al. Loss of TAF8 causes TFIID dysfunction and p53-mediated apoptotic neuronal cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:1013–27.
Chen P, Duan X, Li X, Li J, Ba Q, Wang H. HIPK2 suppresses tumor growth and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through promoting the degradation of HIF-1α. Oncogene. 2020;39:2863–76.
Amelio I, Melino G. The p53 family and the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs): determinants of cancer progression. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40:425–34.
de Andrade KC, Lee EE, Tookmanian EM, Kesserwan CA, Manfredi JJ, Hatton JN, et al. The TP53 database: transition from the International Agency for Research on Cancer to the US National Cancer Institute. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:1071–3.
Kennedy MC, Lowe SW. Mutant p53: it’s not all one and the same. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:983–7.
Schillaci O, Scimeca M, Toschi N, Bonfiglio R, Urbano N, Bonanno E. Combining diagnostic imaging and pathology for improving diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2019;2019:9429761.
Scimeca M, Urbano N, Bonfiglio R, Schillaci O, Bonanno E. Management of oncological patients in the digital era: anatomic pathology and nuclear medicine teamwork. Future Oncol. 2018;14:1013–5.
Bonfiglio R, Di Pietro ML. The impact of oral contraceptive use on breast cancer risk: state of the art and future perspectives in the era of 4P medicine. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;72:11–8.
Smirnov A, Melino G, Candi E. Gene expression in organoids: an expanding horizon. Biol Direct. 2023;18:11.
Bellomaria A, Barbato G, Melino G, Paci M, Melino S. Recognition mechanism of p63 by the E3 ligase Itch: novel strategy in the study and inhibition of this interaction. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:3638–48. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.21918.
Fazi B, Melino S, De Rubeis S, Bagni C, Paci M, Piacentini M, et al. Acetylation of RTN-1C regulates the induction of ER stress by the inhibition of HDAC activity in neuroectodermal tumors. Oncogene. 2009;28:3814–24.
Sunzini F, De Stefano S, Chimenti MS, Melino S. Hydrogen sulfide as potential regulatory gasotransmitter in arthritic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1180.
Melino S, Paci M. Progress for dengue virus diseases. Towards the NS2B-NS3pro inhibition for a therapeutic-based approach. FEBS J. 2007;274:2986–3002.
Aceto A, Dragani B, Melino S, Allocati N, Masulli M, Di Ilio C, et al. Identification of an N-capping box that affects the alpha 6-helix propensity in glutathione S-transferase superfamily proteins: a role for an invariant aspartic residue. Biochem J. 1997;322:229–34.
Sabelli R, Iorio E, De Martino A, Podo F, Ricci A, Viticchiè G, et al. Rhodanese-thioredoxin system and allyl sulfur compounds. FEBS J. 2008;275:3884–99.
Cabras T, Patamia M, Melino S, Inzitari R, Messana I, Castagnola M, et al. Pro-oxidant activity of histatin 5 related Cu(II)-model peptide probed by mass spectrometry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358:277–84.
Servadei F, Anemona L, Cardellini M, Scimeca M, Montanaro M, Rovella V, et al. The risk of carotid plaque instability in patients with metabolic syndrome is higher in women with hypertriglyceridemia. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:98.
Bonfiglio R, Galli F, Varani M, Scimeca M, Borri F, Fazi S, et al. Extensive histopathological characterization of inflamed bowel in the dextran sulfate sodium mouse model with emphasis on clinically relevant biomarkers and targets for drug development. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2028.
Nepravishta R, Sabelli R, Iorio E, Micheli L, Paci M, Melino S. Oxidative species and S-glutathionyl conjugates in the apoptosis induction by allyl thiosulfate. FEBS J. 2012;279:154–67.
Montanaro M, Scimeca M, Anemona L, Servadei F, Giacobbi E, Bonfiglio R, et al. The paradox effect of calcification in carotid atherosclerosis: microcalcification is correlated with plaque instability. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:395.
Yang X, Smirnov A, Buonomo OC, Mauriello A, Shi Y, Bischof J, et al. A primary luminal/HER2 negative breast cancer patient with mismatch repair deficiency. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:365.
Han Y, Rovella V, Smirnov A, Buonomo OC, Mauriello A, Perretta T, et al. A BRCA2 germline mutation and high expression of immune checkpoints in a TNBC patient. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9:370.
Wang M, Luo W, Jones K, Bian X, Williams R, Higson H, et al. SomaticCombiner: improving the performance of somatic variant calling based on evaluation tests and a consensus approach. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12898.
Kim S, Scheffler K, Halpern AL, Bekritsky MA, Noh E, Källberg M, et al. Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat Methods. 2018;15:591–4.
Koboldt DC, Chen K, Wylie T, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Mardis ER, et al. VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2283–5.
Larson DE, Harris CC, Chen K, Koboldt DC, Abbott TE, Dooling DJ, et al. SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:311–7.
Ha G, Roth A, Khattra J, Ho J, Yap D, Prentice LM, et al. TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2014;24:1881–93.
Rausch T, Zichner T, Schlattl A, Stütz AM, Benes V, Korbel JO. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:i333–9.
Chen X, Schulz-Trieglaff O, Shaw R, Barnes B, Schlesinger F, Källberg M, et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1220–2.
Manders F, Brandsma AM, de Kanter J, Verheul M, Oka R, van Roosmalen MJ, et al. MutationalPatterns: the one stop shop for the analysis of mutational processes. BMC Genomics. 2022;23:134.
Melino S, Nepravishta R, Bellomaria A, Di Marco S, Paci M. Nucleic acid binding of the RTN1-C C-terminal region: toward the functional role of a reticulon protein. Biochemistry. 2009;48:242–53.
Melino S, Leo S, Toska Papajani V. Natural hydrogen sulfide donors from Allium sp. as a nutraceutical approach in Type 2 diabetes prevention and therapy. Nutrients. 2019;11:1581.
Gallo M, Paludi D, Cicero DO, Chiovitti K, Millo E, Salis A, et al. Identification of a conserved N-capping box important for the structural autonomy of the prion alpha 3-helix: the disease associated D202N mutation destabilizes the helical conformation. Int J Immunopathol Pharm. 2005;18:95–112.
Huang MN, McPherson JR, Cutcutache I, Teh BT, Tan P, Rozen SG. MSIseq: software for assessing microsatellite instability from catalogs of somatic mutations. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13321.
Oza VH, Fisher JL, Darji R, Lasseigne BN. CINmetrics: an R package for analyzing copy number aberrations as a measure of chromosomal instability. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15244.
Grendár M, Martínek P, Loderer D, Ondič O CNHplus: the chromosomal copy number heterogeneity which respects biological constraints. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.30.510279. (2022).
Spurr LF, Touat M, Taylor AM, Dubuc AM, Shih J, Meredith DM, et al. Quantification of aneuploidy in targeted sequencing data using ASCETS. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2461–3.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–6.
Funding
This work has been partially supported by the MUR-PNRR M4C2I1.3 PE6 project PE00000019 Heal Italia (CUP: E83C22004670001) to GM, MA, AM, GS; Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca contro il Cancro (AIRC) to GM (IG 2022 ID 27366; 2023-2027) to EC (IG#22206; 2019-2023), The Ministry of Health-PNRR INNOVA (PNC-E3-2022-23683266 PNCHLS-DA) to MS, AM, EC, MA and GM, Fondazione Luigi Maria Monti IDI-IRCCS (R.C. to EC), Ministry of Health & MAECI Italy-China Science and Technology Cooperation (#PGR00961) to EC. Work has been also supported by Regione Lazio through LazioInnova Progetto Gruppo di Ricerca n 85-2017-14986; n 33 & 55-2021-T0002E0001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BP, MA, SM, CE conceived the project, SM, MA, GR, NE, BR, AM and BJ wrote the manuscript; BR, IV, CM, VM, RV, FS, EG, SY revised the manuscript. BJ, BR and SM prepared figures. All of the Authors have approved this submitted version.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no comoeting interests.
Ethics approval
All the procedures carried out in the research with participation of humans were in compliance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national ethics committee and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its subsequent changes or with comparable ethics standards.
Informed consent
Informed voluntary consent was obtained from every participant of the study: Approval on 09-2019, number 96-19.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Scimeca, M., Bischof, J., Bonfiglio, R. et al. Molecular profiling of a bladder cancer with very high tumour mutational burden. Cell Death Discov. 10, 202 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01883-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-01883-x