Abstract
A large number of small non-coding RNAs derived from tRNAs, called tRNA-derived small RNA (tsRNAs), have been identified by high-throughput RNA sequencing of cell lines. Further research has revealed that they are not produced via random tRNA degradation, but through degradation by specific nuclease cleavages, such as Elac Ribonuclease Z 2 (ELAC2)/RNase Z, RNase L, Dicer, and angiogenin (ANG), the tsRNAs can be classified into the following types based on the location from which they have been derived from the parental tRNA: tRF-1s, tRF-3s, tRF-5s, tiRNA, and tRF-2s/i-tRFs. Moreover, tsRNAs are a type of small RNAs with diverse functions, including gene expression regulation, anti-apoptosis, translation inhibition, participation in epigenetic regulation, initial virus reverse transcription, promote virus replication and cell-to-cell communication. Certain types of tsRNAs are overexpressed in cancer tissues, but are underexpressed in normal tissues. Therefore, the relationship between tsRNAs and the occurrence and development of cancer has attracted significant research attention. Research advancements have contributed to further discoveries of the biological activities of tsRNAs, but the mechanisms of their biogenesis and functions have not been fully elucidated. This article reviews the classification and biological functions of tsRNAs, and introduces the research progress in gynecological malignancies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
tsRNAs are not random degradation fragments from tRNAs;
-
tsRNAs can be classified into tRF-1s, tRF-3s, tRF-5s, tiRNA, and tRF-2s based on the location from which they have been derived from the parental;
-
tsRNAs participate in gene expression regulation, anti-apoptosis, translation inhibition, and virus infection;
-
tsRNAs are involved in the occurrence and development of cancer.
Open Questions
-
What mechanism is responsible for the production of each type of tsRNA?
-
How does tsRNA participate in gene regulation, anti-apoptosis, translation inhibition, and virus infection?
-
What is the application prospect of tsRNA as a diagnostic marker and target for the treatment of gynecological malignancies?
Introduction
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is widely used in molecular biology for research on the functions of RNA at all levels. This approach reveals the diversity of mRNA splicing and the mechanisms by which ncRNA and enhancer RNA regulate gene expression.
The advancements in the RNA-seq technique have contributed to the identification of small non-coding RNAs with a length of approximately 13–48 nts. Further sequencing analysis suggested that the abundance of this type of RNA is second only to miRNAs and is derived from the precise processing of the 5′- or 3′-ends of mature tRNA or pre-tRNA, producing several types of tRNA-derived small RNA (tsRNAs). One subtype is termed tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) includes tRF-1s, tRF-3s, and tRF-5s [1]. Meanwhile, other tsRNA types have been found, such as tRF-2s or i-tRFs, stress-induced tRNA (tiRNA) (Fig. 1). The evolution of tsRNAs from bacteria to humans is highly conserved [2]. tsRNAs have diverse functions, such as gene expression, translation inhibition, and virus infection [3, 4]. An earlier study showed that tRNA cleavage is one of the mechanisms of tsRNA biogenesis [5]. Studies have shown that the generation of some tsRNAs, such as tRF-3s and tRF-5s, is related to multiple RNase family members, including ANG and Dicer, but the role of Dicer in tsRNA generation may be a particular case rather than a conventional one because the presence of tsRNA is also easily detected in Dicer knockout (Dicer−/−) mouse fibroblasts, it indicates that the production of this type of tsRNA is independent of Dicer processing [2, 6,7,8]. tsRNAs are derived from most tRNA genes in unequal abundance, different sizes, and various regions. Their biogenesis is regulated in many ways and has well-defined 5′- and 3′-ends; hence, tsRNAs are not a product of random cleavage of tRNAs [9]. In view of the diversity of the types and functions of tsRNAs, which are increasingly being valued by researchers, numerous tsRNAs have been proven to play an important role in the occurrence and development of malignant tumors (Table 1). This article reviews the structure, source, function of various tsRNAs, and introduces the research progress in common gynecological malignancies.
Source and structure of tsRNA
Source and structure of tRF-1s
tRF-1s is derived from pre-tRNA, and its 3′-end contains an RNA polymerase III transcription-termination sequence. The first tRF-1 discovered was named tRF-1001. Its sequence started from the 3′-end of the mature tRNA exactly before the CCA sequence was added. There are 5–6 consecutive thymines at the 3′-end of the corresponding locus, which is the typical termination signal for RNA polymerase III transcription [10]. These sequence characteristics indicate that tRF-1s are derived from the 3′-tail sequence of pre-tRNA, which is released by the precise cleavage of the tRNA endonuclease ELAC2 during the maturation of the 3′-end of the tRNA. The reduction of tRF-1001 and the concomitant accumulation of pre-tRNA also confirmed this notion in an experiment with ELAC2 knockdown [1]. ELAC2 is considered a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer [11]. Later, the protein encoded by this gene was discovered to have a C-terminal domain with tRNA 3′-end-processing endoribonuclease activity, which catalyzes the removal of the 3′-tail sequence sequence from pre-tRNA. The production of tRF-1s is low since only 14.6% of tRNA loci can produce tRF-1. These differences show that the molecules of tRF-1s are selectively processed or retained in cells to achieve specific biological functions [1].
In tRFdb, according to their order of discovery, tRF-1s have been consecutively named tRF-1001, tRF1003, tRF1004, etc. [12]. So far, 32 human tRF-1s have been identified in tRFdb. The number of tRF-1s may differ in other databases, such as MINTbase [13].
The length of tRF-1s varies from 14 to 30 nucleotides, and its 3′-end contains at least three consecutive uracils. Among the 622 loci in the human genome, at the 3′-end, the distance between the tRNA and the RNA polymerase III termination signal is variable. The sequence of each tRF-1 is the same as the tail sequence of the corresponding tRNA, which is a sequence feature of tRF-1s.
Source and structure of tRF-3s
tRF-3s is derived from the 3′-end of mature tRNA and can be divided into two types based on its cutting position (U/A or U/U): tRF-3a and tRF-3b with lengths of 18 and 22 nucleotides, respectively. tRF-3s can be produced by Dicer cutting of the TΨC loop of mature tRNA [13]. The 22- nucleotide tRF-3b is produced by cleavage between the 54th and 55th nucleotides on the TΨC loop. The 18- nucleotide tRF-3a is generated by cleavage between the 58th and 59th nucleotides on the TΨC loop. The ends of the sequence contain the CCA sequence, added during mature tRNA processing. The number of tRF-3s is significantly higher than that of tRF-1s, and 461 tRF-3s have been currently identified and recorded in tRFdb.
Source and structure of tRF-5s
tRF-5s can be produced by Dicer and ANG cleavage, starting from the 5′-end of the mature tRNA, including the complete structure of the 5′-end, and terminating before the anticodon loop [8]. Based on its different termination sites, tRF-5s can be divided into three sub-types: tRF-5a, tRF-5b, and tRF-5c, with lengths 14–16, 22–24, and 28–30 nucleotides, respectively [3]. The number of tRF-5s is also significantly higher than that of tRF-1s and tRF-3s, reaching 539 species.
Source and structure of tiRNA
Under hypoxic nutrient deficiency or other stress conditions, tRNA can be cleaved in the anticodon loop to form tiRNA by a specific nuclease that recognizes specific tRNA structural sites [14, 15]. The tiRNA is also called tRNA halves in other literature and can be divided into two subtypes: 5’tiRNA and 3’tiRNA. Under stress conditions, the specific nuclease that induces tRNA cleavage and produces tiRNA is angiogenin (ANG). The evidence comes from two aspects [3]: first, 3’tiRNA has a 5′hydroxyl label, while 5’tiRNA has a cyclic phosphate, which is the typical expression of cleavage by the RNase A nuclease family; second, the knockdown of angiogenin considerably reduces the level of tiRNA. Stress conditions that promote tRNA’s angiogenin (ANG) cleavage to produce tiRNAs include hypoxia, starvation, viral infection, arsenic exposure, heat shock, and heavy metal toxicity [16,17,18,19,20,–21].
Angiogenin (ANG) has ribonuclease activity and can thus be transferred to the cytoplasm and accumulate in stress granules (SG) under stress conditions [22]. The production of tiRNA is not a product of random degradation of RNA. So, by what mechanism does ANG control its nuclease activity? Ribonuclease inhibitor 1 (RNH1) is a protein widely expressed in various tissues that can bind to and inhibit pancreatic ribonuclease [23]. Immunoprecipitation under normal physiological conditions has confirmed that RNH1 interacts with cytoplasmic ANG but is not related to nuclear ANG. Therefore, nuclear ANG has enzymatic activity, but cytosolic ANG is inhibited. In contrast, RNH1 interacts with nuclear ANG under stress conditions but is not related to cytoplasmic ANG. Therefore, nuclear ANG is suppressed, but cytoplasmic ANG is not. RNH1 knockout would change the cellular localization of ANG and terminate the biological activity of ANG. Therefore, the cellular activity of ANG is suggested to be controlled by its localization and association with RNH1 [24]. In addition, a number of animal experiments have revealed that the methylation modification of mature tRNA by DNA methyltransferase 2 (DNMT2) or cytosine-5 methyltransferase NOP2/Sun RNA Methyltransferase 2 (NSUN2) promotes the stability of mature tRNA and provides resistance to the cleavage of ANG [25,26,–27]. However, evidence has shown that certain tiRNAs do not depend on ANG cleavage; the sequence of such tiRNAs is longer than that of conventional tiRNAs, suggesting that the corresponding nuclease cleavage site should be outside of the anticodon loop [28, 29]. In the case of ANG knockout, only part of the expression level of tsRNA changes, indicating that ANG is only responsible for producing part of tsRNA rather than all tsRNAs, and there should be other endonucleases involved in the production of tsRNA [30]. Studies have shown that RNase L is activated explicitly during dsRNA reaction, which can cleave tRNA at specific sites of the anticodon loop to produce tiRNA [31].
The 5′-tiRNA sequence is shorter than that of 3’tiRNA, approximately 31–36 nt versus 36–41 nt, correspondingly. Due to the cleavage position of ANG, the 5′-end of 5’-tiRNA is a single 5′-monophosphate, and the 3′-end may be a 2′, 3′-cyclic phosphate. The 5′-end of 3′-tiRNA is a hydroxyl group. The difference in the sequence indicates that the two types of tiRNA have diverse functions [21].
Sex hormone-dependent tRNA-derived RNAs (SHOT-RNAs) is a specific tiRNA type, produced by ANG cleavage of fully aminoacylated mature tRNA, is abundantly expressed in hormone-dependent breast and prostate cancer [32]. The mRNA expression levels of ANG and RNH1 in LNCaP-FGC cells did not change in hormone-free medium culture, indicating that ANG and RNH1 do not directly regulate the expression of SHOT-tiRNA.
Source and structure of tRF-2s/i-tRFs
tRF-2s/i-tRFs are a class of atypical tsRNA derived from tRNAs. In other literature, they are also divided into different types of tsRNAs. Their structural characteristics are that they contain the anticodon loop and stem of tRNA but do not extend to the 5′-end and 3′ -ends. Its production may be related to hypoxia stress stimulation, but the specific mechanism remains unclear. The i-tRFs are longer than tRF-2s, and the cleavage position is located in D-loop and T-loop. It has been suggested that the length of this class of tsRNA is also closely related to some disease states [3, 15, 33,34,35].
tsRNA functions
Gene expression regulation
The tsRNA is an abundantly expressed non-coding small RNA that can bind to mRNA in a miRNA-like manner to regulate target gene expression. It is noteworthy that tsRNAs can be loaded into AGO family proteins (Fig. 2A), and the combination of the two regulates gene expression through trans-silencing [36]. An analysis of Photoactivatable 164 Ribonucleoside-Enhanced Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (PAR-CILP) data showed that tRF-5s and tRF-3s contain abundant seed sequences that match the central region of RNA cross-linking, indicating that tRF-5s and tRF-3s are associated with AGO1, AGO3, and AGO4, but not with AGO2; thousands of tsRNA-mRNA chimeras were found in the Crosslinking, Ligation, and Sequencing of Hybrids (CLASH) data [2]. This strong evidence shows that tsRNAs target and regulate RNA functions in a miRNA-like manner, thereby regulating gene expression. In addition, a previous investigation found that a group of specific tsRNAs containing the CU-box motif binds to the cancer-promoting RNA-binding protein Y-box Binding Protein 1(YBX-1), replacing YBX-1 transcripts from the YBX-1 complex [15]. At the post-transcriptional level this tsRNAs group inhibited the expression of the YBX-1 transcript, changed the stability of oncogene mRNA, affected the expression of oncogene, and finally induced changes in the phenotype of the cancer cells (Fig. 2B).
Protein translation inhibition
Under stress conditions, protein translation is reprogrammed to facilitate the survival of mammalian cells [37]. Stress conditions can promote the production of tsRNAs (mainly tiRNA), and tiRNA plays an important role in reprogramming protein translation through a pathway independent of phosphorylated eIF2α [38]. In a pull-down experiment in which biotin-labeled RNA was used, tiRNA quantitatively displaced Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4 G/A (eIF4G/A) from the mRNA without cap-structure, but only a small part of eIF4G was displaced from mRNA with a cap-structure. The displacement of eIF4G/A leads to a decrease in the degree of eIF4E displacement, which reduces the affinity of eIF4E to interact with the cap. This outcome suggests that tiRNA indirectly or directly binds to eIF4G, eIF4A, or the eIF4G/A complex, causing translational inhibition (Fig. 3A). tRNA contains many highly conserved residues which are necessary for their correct three-dimensional folding and translation recognition mechanism [39]. In addition, 5′-tiRNA assembles a unique G-quadruplex structure. RNA G-quadruplex (RG4) is a critical component of the cellular stress response, which is necessary for tsRNAs function in the regulation of mRNA translation [40]. The source of tRF-5s is similar to that of 5′tiRNA. It is speculated that tRF-5s also has the function of inhibiting protein translation. Studies have shown that most tRF-5s can indeed inhibit protein translation, which is caused by a conservative sequence or structural features (“GG” dinucleotides) conferred [41]. Previous research already confirmed the protein that binds to mammalian tsRNAs to elucidate the underlying mechanism driving translational inhibition [42].
The mechanism of tsRNA inhibiting protein translation may also apply to the tRNA fragments cleaving by Schlafen III (SLNF III) family proteins SLFN13, and its C-terminal region is homologous to the RNA helicase family I. Studies have proved that SLFN13 is a new tRNA targeted ribonuclease to inhibit the replication and activity of the virus by cleaving tRNA, leading to the inhibition of overall translation and has potent anti-HIV activity [43, 44]. It also found that the position of SLFN13 cleaving tRNA is next to the T loop of tRNA. SLFN 11 also belongs to the SLNF III protein family, which can selectively inhibit HIV protein synthesis by binding to tRNA in a codon usage-dependent manner [45]. Moreover, its homology with SLFN 13 is very high, up to 85%, so we have reason to believe that SLNF 11 may have similar functions to SLFN13. Further studies are needed to clarify the exact antiviral mechanism of SLFN11 and SLFN 13 (Fig. 3B).
Studies have proved that tRF_U3_1 has a particular interaction with La/SSB through various experimental methods to verify the interaction [4, 46, 47]. As a molecular chaperone, La/SSB could bind to the stem-loop IV of HCV internal ribosome entry site (IRES) to promote IRES-mediated translation initiation [48]. tRF_U3_1 could show a similar inhibitory effect on poliovirus IRES, and tRF-3U-1 is stable due to the presence of La/SSB in the cytoplasm. tRF-3U-1 inhibits HCV IRES-mediated translation by isolating limited La/SSB in the cytoplasm. Therefore, tRF_U3_1 could play a significant negative regulatory role in La/SSB-dependent virus proteins translation (Fig. 3C).
Cell apoptosis inhibition
Studies have shown that the combination of tRNA and cytochrome C weakens the activities of the combination of cytochrome C and Apaf-1, thereby blocking the formation of apoptotic bodies and the activation of caspase-9, and resulting in cell survival promotion [49]. Whether tsRNA produced by tRNA cleavage under stress conditions retains the anti-apoptotic function of full-length tRNA has attracted appreciable research interest. Further investigations revealed that the accumulation of angiogenin-induced tiRNA is accompanied by an increased survival rate of hyperosmotic stress mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The RNP complex of small RNA and cytochrome C is found in the cells treated with angiogenin under stress conditions. The analysis of small RNA sequencing results of the RNA obtained by immunoprecipitation of the complex showed that the small RNA included tiRNA produced by angiogenesis and cleavage of tRNA. Therefore, a mechanism is believed to exist associated with the binding of cytochrome C and tiRNA inhibition of endogenous apoptosis [50] (Fig. 4).
In addition, tiRNA can selectively enhance the translation of mRNAs involved in anti-apoptotic genes, so that cells can survive under conditions that are not conducive to survival [51]. Generally, the translation of eukaryotic mRNA requires a 5′-cap to mediate ribosome binding, but exceptions are present in eukaryotes and viruses. For example, some genes have a short RNA sequence (approximately 150–250 bp) at the 5′-end. This RNA sequence type can fold into a structure similar to that of the initial tRNA, thereby mediating ribosomal RNA binding and initiating protein translation. This untranslated RNA is called the internal ribosome entry site (IRES). Therefore, in the case of 5′-cap-dependent translation downregulation during cellular stress, IRES can be used for the translation of key regulatory proteins [52]. The genes translated by IRES are usually related to cell survival and apoptosis. This type of genes includes Bcl-2, BAG-1, HiaP2, XIAP, HIF-1a., VEGF, c-Myc, c-Myb, etc [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,–60].
Participation in epigenetic regulation
The genetic significance of transposons is related to their involvement in insertion mutations, new gene formation, chromosomal aberrations, and biological evolution. They have a substantial impact on the epigenetic control of the genome. The body strictly controls its activities: the transcription of transposons is subject to inhibition of genetic markers such as histone modification and DNA methylation [61]. Studies have shown that other mechanisms exist for transposon activity regulation. To initiate proliferation, long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-retrotransposons) are dependent on reverse-transcribed tRNA availability. In the absence of epigenetic transcriptional inhibition, tRF-3a can strongly inhibit mouse LTR-retrotransposon or endogenous retrovirus (ERV) activity by targeting the highly conserved primer binding site of LTR-retrotransposon (Fig. 5). By transposition reporter gene detection analysis, tsRNA was found to act on any LTR-retrotransposon with replication capability. Meanwhile, tRF-3b reduced the level of the RNA and the protein of the coding-capable autonomous original by post-transcriptional silencing, affecting the transposon expression [62].
Initial virus reverse transcription and promote virus replication
As mentioned above, tsRNAs produce antiviral effects by inhibiting the protein synthesis of HIV. However, previous works suggest that some tsRNA can also trigger reverse transcription and promote virus replication after virus infection. It was found that the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection can induce cells to produce specific types of tsRNA [63]. Particular tsRNA antisense oligonucleotides or scrambled control oligonucleotides can treat infectious virus particles produced by cells. After apparent tsRNA silence, the copies of RSV were significantly reduced; treatment with specific tsRNAs or negative control mimics showed a significant increase in the copies of RSV. The results strongly proved that a particular tsRNA type could promote RSV replication. Another study showed that the 3′-part of tRF-5Glu-CTC can recognize the target site in the 3′UTR of apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (APOER2) mRNA. As a host anti-RSV protein, APOER2 can promote RSV replication after its suppression [64] (Fig. 6). Ruggero et al. explored microRNA (miRNA) and tsRNA in HTLV-1 infected cells [65]. Their results suggest that the expression of several sequences derived from tRNAs are significantly upregulated in uninfected and infected cells. One of the most abundant tRNA fragments (tRF-3019) comes from the 3’-end of tRNA-proline. The primer binding site of tRF-3019 and HTLV-1 showed perfect sequence complementarity. In vitro reverse transcriptase assay results confirmed that tRF-3019 can initiate reverse transcription of HTLV-1. tRNA-proline and tRF-3019 were detected in virus particles isolated from HTLV-1 infected cells. These findings suggest that tRF-3019 may play an essential role in initiating HTLV-1 reverse transcription.
Cell-to-cell communication
RNAs can exist in microvesicles and exosomes, which are called extracellular RNA (exRNA), and can be found in almost all body fluids [66]. It is exciting that this exRNA can affect cell behavior as a signal molecule and plays an essential role in intercellular communication [67, 68]. Because exRNAs can exist stably in their transport carrier extracellular vesicles (EVs), it has the potential to become a diagnostic biomarker of various diseases [69]. Studies have shown that tsRNAs are more enriched than other types of RNA in the EVs produced by cell lines or peripheral blood cells [69, 70]. (Fig. 7). Further studies showed that immune activation signal stimulated T cells could enhance the secretion of extracellular vesicles containing tsRNAs, resulting in the inhibition of T cell activation and cytokine production [69]. Another study showed that 5’tiRNA-Gly from tRNA-Gly was secreted in a concentration-dependent manner in EVs. The production rate of 5’tiRNA-Gly in stressed cells was high, with good thermodynamics and enzyme stability. It was pointed out that the expression of 5’tiRNA-Gly was upregulated during acute stress and could mediate intercellular communication [71].
Current research status of tsRNA in gynecological malignancies
In 2020, the number of new cancers in women worldwide reached 9.23 million, with a total number of 4.43 million deaths, of which 1.43 million were new cases of cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers [72]. These data show the severe threat that common gynecological malignant tumors pose to women’s life and health. Thus, further comprehensive research on the pathogenesis, diagnostic markers, and therapeutic targets of gynecological malignant cancers is critical. The role of tsRNAs in gynecological malignant cancer has gradually been unveiled. Our review of previous works showed that recent research on the relationships between tsRNA and gynecological malignancies has been focused only on ovarian and cervical cancers, whereas no report is available on endometrial cancer. Most currently employed research approaches are associated with detecting and establishing differentially expressed tsRNAs through RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR verification. Then, further cell function experiments and mechanism analysis, or receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve drawing, are implemented to determine the function and value of tsRNA as a diagnostic marker.
An earlier study was conducted to identify high-grade serous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary and related tsRNAs and their function and mechanism of action in the SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cell line [73]. The authors used small RNA sequencing and found that a total number of 27 tsRNAs were differentially expressed between patients with high-grade ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and healthy controls. The functions of these tsRNAs involved protein phosphorylation modification, transcription, affecting tumor cell migration and the MAPK and Wnt signaling pathways. Another investigation was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of circulating tsRNAs in ovarian cancer by assessments of small RNA transcriptome sequencing data from the serum of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, borderline and benign ovarian tumors collected from public databases, using healthy people as a control [74]. These researchers found a total number of 29 863 tsRNA, of which only four tsRNAs derived from tRNA-Gly were differentially expressed between ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls, which were consecutively named ts1–4. By ROC curve analysis, the area of the curve for the four tsRNA in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors alone was 0.836–0.948, of which ts-3 had an optimal performance. Nevertheless, further research is needed to determine the value of ts-3 as a diagnostic marker for ovarian cancer.
AlkB homolog 3(ALKBH3) is a tRNA methylase. Studies have shown that the increase in tsRNA expression depends on the upregulation of the expression of tRNA demethylase ALKBH3 in cells [75]. Sequencing of the tsRNA in HeLa cells stably expressing ALKBH3 and control cells was applied in a study to explore the function of ALKBH3 in a cervical cancer HeLa cell line. The scientists found that the overexpression of ALKBH3 enhanced the production of tsRNA in HeLa cells, with the prevalence of 5′tRF-GlyGCC. Cell function experiments revealed that 5′-tRF-GlyGCC enhanced the proliferation of wild-type HeLa cells and weakened the inhibitory effect of ALKBH3−/− cell proliferation. In addition, 5′-tRF-GlyGCC promoted the synthesis of proteins in HeLa cells. This evidence indicates that 5-‘tRF-GlyGCC is involved in the progression of ALKBH3-mediated cervical cancer [76].
Summary and prospects
Research on tsRNA has now attracted significant research interest, establishing diverse their types and abundance of functions. According to their corresponding positions in the parental tRNA transcripts, they are classified into tRF-1s, tRF-3s, tRF-5s, tiRNA, and tRF-2s/i-tRFs [3]. Each particular type of tsRNA has a specific structure and production method. Their functions are various, including gene expression regulation, protein translation inhibition, anti-apoptotic effects, and participation in epigenetic regulation, initial virus reverse transcription, promote virus replication and cell-to-cell communication. In addition, the function of tsRNA also involves transgenerational inheritance [77]. Their role in malignant tumors has also been gradually revealed, which is critically important. tsRNAs are expected to be used as a marker for the diagnosis, progression, and prognosis of malignant tumors, and as a target for treatment, with broad application prospects. However, the exact underlying mechanisms of action and the corresponding functions of each tsRNA type have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, further research is needed to elucidate them. Meanwhile, with the development of high-throughput sequencing technology and the emergence of even more advanced research methods, increasingly more tsRNA will be discovered, with a high diversity of types and functions, which would extend their potential beneficial applications.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Lee YS, Shibata Y, Malhotra A, Dutta A. A novel class of small RNAs: tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs). Gene Dev. 2009;23:2639–49.
Kumar P, Anaya J, Mudunuri SB, Dutta A. Meta-analysis of tRNA derived RNA fragments reveals that they are evolutionarily conserved and associate with AGO proteins to recognize specific RNA targets. BMC Biol. 2014;12:78.
Kumar P, Kuscu C, Dutta A. Biogenesis and function of transfer RNA-related fragments (tRFs). Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:679–89.
Cho H, Lee W, Kim G, Lee S, Moon J, Kim M, et al. Regulation of La/SSB-dependent viral gene expression by pre-tRNA 3′ trailer-derived tRNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:9888–901.
Wang Q, Lee I, Ren J, Ajay SS, Lee YS, Bao X. Identification and functional characterization of tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Mol Ther. 2013;21:368–79.
Langenberger D, Cakir MV, Hoffmann S, Stadler PF. Dicer-processed small RNAs: rules and exceptions. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2013;320:35–46.
Li Z, Ender C, Meister G, Moore PS, Chang Y, John B. Extensive terminal and asymmetric processing of small RNAs from rRNAs, snoRNAs, snRNAs, and tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:6787–99.
Cole C, Sobala A, Lu C, Thatcher SR, Bowman A, Brown JWS. et al. Filtering of deep sequencing data reveals the existence of abundant Dicer-dependent small RNAs derived from tRNAs. RNA. 2009;15:2147–60.
Selitsky SR, Baran-Gale J, Honda M, Yamane D, Masaki T, Fannin EE, et al. Small tRNA-derived RNAs are increased and more abundant than microRNAs in chronic hepatitis B and C. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7675.
Koski RA, Clarkson SG. Synthesis and maturation of Xenopus laevis methionine tRNA gene transcripts in homologous cell-free extracts. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:4514–21.
Tavtigian SV, Simard J, Teng DH, Abtin V, Baumgard M, Beck A, et al. A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet. 2001;27:172–80.
Kumar P, Mudunuri SB, Anaya J, Dutta A. tRFdb: a database for transfer RNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D141–D145.
Pliatsika V, Loher P, Magee R, Telonis AG, Londin E, Shigematsu M, et al. MINTbase v2.0: a comprehensive database for tRNA-derived fragments that includes nuclear and mitochondrial fragments from all The Cancer Genome Atlas projects. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D152–D159.
Schimmel P. The emerging complexity of the tRNA world: mammalian tRNAs beyond protein synthesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2018;19:45–58.
Goodarzi H, Liu X, Nguyen HCB, Zhang S, Fish L, Tavazoie SF. Endogenous tRNA-derived fragments suppress breast cancer progression via YBX1 displacement. Cell. 2015;161:790–802.
Akiyama Y, Kharel P, Abe T, Anderson P, Ivanov P. Isolation and initial structure-functional characterization of endogenous tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs. RNA Biol. 2020;17:1116–24.
Liu S, Chen Y, Ren Y, Zhou J, Ren J, Lee I, et al. A tRNA-derived RNA fragment plays an important role in the mechanism of arsenite-induced cellular responses. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16838.
Goncalves KA, Silberstein L, Li S, Severe N, Hu MG, Yang H, et al. Angiogenin promotes hematopoietic regeneration by dichotomously regulating quiescence of stem and progenitor cells. Cell. 2016;166:894–906.
Saikia M, Hatzoglou M. The many virtues of tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs (tiRNAs): Discovering novel mechanisms of stress response and effect on human health. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:29761–8.
Saikia M, Krokowski D, Guan B, Ivanov P, Parisien M, Hu G, et al. Genome-wide identification and quantitative analysis of cleaved tRNA fragments induced by cellular stress. J. Biol Chem. 2012;287:42708–25.
Yamasaki S, Ivanov P, Hu G, Anderson P. Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J. Cell Biol. 2009;185:35–42.
Emara MM, Ivanov P, Hickman T, Dawra N, Tisdale S, Kedersha N, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA-derived stress-induced RNAs promote stress-induced stress granule assembly. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10959–68.
Chennupati V, Veiga DFT, Maslowski KM, Andina N, Tardivel A, Yu EC. et al. Ribonuclease inhibitor 1 regulates erythropoiesis by controlling GATA1 translation. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:1597–614.
Pizzo E, Sarcinelli C, Sheng J, Fusco S, Formiggini F, Netti P, et al. Ribonuclease/angiogenin inhibitor 1 regulates stress-induced subcellular localization of angiogenin to control growth and survival. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:4308–19.
Blanco S, Dietmann S, Flores JV, Hussain S, Kutter C, Humphreys P, et al. Aberrant methylation of tRNAs links cellular stress to neuro‐developmental disorders. EMBO J. 2014;33:2020–39.
Tuorto F, Liebers R, Musch T, Schaefer M, Hofmann S, Kellner S, et al. RNA cytosine methylation by Dnmt2 and NSun2 promotes tRNA stability and protein synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:900–5.
Schaefer M, Pollex T, Hanna K, Tuorto F, Meusburger M, Helm M, et al. RNA methylation by Dnmt2 protects transfer RNAs against stress-induced cleavage. Gene Dev. 2010;24:1590–5.
Rashad S, Han X, Sato K, Mishima E, Abe T, Tominaga T, et al. The stress specific impact of ALKBH1 on tRNA cleavage and tiRNA generation. RNA Biol. 2020;17:1092–103.
Krishna S, Yim DG, Lakshmanan V, Tirumalai V, Koh JL, Park JE, et al. Dynamic expression of tRNA-derived small RNAs define cellular states. EMBO Rep. 2019;20:e47789.
Krishna S, Raghavan S, DasGupta R, Palakodeti D. tRNA-derived fragments (tRFs): establishing their turf in post-transcriptional gene regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:2607–19.
Donovan J, Rath S, Kolet-Mandrikov D, Korennykh A. Rapid RNase L-driven arrest of protein synthesis in the dsRNA response without degradation of translation machinery. RNA. 2017;23:1660–71.
Honda S, Loher P, Shigematsu M, Palazzo JP, Suzuki R, Imoto I, et al. Sex hormone-dependent tRNA halves enhance cell proliferation in breast and prostate cancers. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E3816–E3825.
Qin C, Xu PP, Zhang X, Zhang C, Liu CB, Yang DG, et al. Pathological significance of tRNA-derived small RNAs in neurological disorders. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15:212–21.
Kim HK. Transfer RNA-derived small non-coding RNA: Dual regulator of protein synthesis. Mol Cells. 2019;42:687–92.
Park EJ, Kim TH. Fine-tuning of gene expression by tRNA-derived fragments during abiotic stress signal transduction. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:518.
Haussecker D, Huang Y, Lau A, Parameswaran P, Fire AZ, Kay MA. Human tRNA-derived small RNAs in the global regulation of RNA silencing. RNA. 2010;16:673–95. 2010-04-01.
Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:519–29.
Ivanov P, Emara MM, Villen J, Gygi SP, Anderson P. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol Cell. 2011;43:613–23.
Marck C, Grosjean H. tRNomics: analysis of tRNA genes from 50 genomes of Eukarya, Archaea, and Bacteria reveals anticodon-sparing strategies and domain-specific features. RNA. 2002;8:1189–232.
Lyons SM, Gudanis D, Coyne SM, Gdaniec Z, Ivanov P. Identification of functional tetramolecular RNA G-quadruplexes derived from transfer RNAs. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1127.
Sobala A, Hutvagner G. Small RNAs derived from the 5′ end of tRNA can inhibit protein translation in human cells. RNA Biol. 2014;10:553–63.
Keam SP, Sobala A, Ten Have S, Hutvagner G. tRNA-derived RNA fragments associate with human multisynthetase complex (MSC) and modulate ribosomal protein translation. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:413–20.
Yang JY, Deng XY, Li YS, Ma XC, Feng JX, Yu B, et al. Structure of Schlafen13 reveals a new class of tRNA/rRNA- targeting RNase engaged in translational control. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1165.
Bustos O, Naik S, Ayers G, Casola C, Perez-Lamigueiro MA, Chippindale PT, et al. Evolution of the Schlafen genes, a gene family associated with embryonic lethality, meiotic drive, immune processes, and orthopoxvirus virulence. Gene. 2009;447:1–11.
Li M, Kao E, Gao X, Sandig H, Limmer K, Pavon-Eternod M, et al. Codon-usage-based inhibition of HIV protein synthesis by human schlafen 11. Nature. 2012;491:125–8.
Gogakos T, Brown M, Garzia A, Meyer C, Hafner M, Tuschl T. Characterizing expression and processing of precursor and mature human tRNAs by hydro-tRNAseq and PAR-CLIP. Cell Rep. 2017;20:1463–75.
Hafner M, Landthaler M, Burger L, Khorshid M, Hausser J, Berninger P, et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell. 2010;141:129–41.
Pudi R, Abhiman S, Srinivasan N, Das S. Hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation is stimulated by specific interaction of independent regions of human La autoantigen. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:12231–40.
Mei Y, Yong J, Liu H, Shi Y, Meinkoth J, Dreyfuss G, et al. tRNA binds to cytochrome c and inhibits caspase activation. Mol Cell. 2010;37:668–78.
Saikia M, Jobava R, Parisien M, Putnam A, Krokowski D, Gao XH, et al. Angiogenin-cleaved tRNA halves interact with cytochrome c, protecting cells from apoptosis during osmotic stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:2450–63.
Li S, Hu G. Emerging role of angiogenin in stress response and cell survival under adverse conditions. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:2822–6.
Hertz MI, Landry DM, Willis AE, Luo G, Thompson SR. Ribosomal protein S25 dependency reveals a common mechanism for diverse internal ribosome entry sites and ribosome shunting. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:1016–26.
Mitchell SA, Spriggs KA, Bushell M, Evans JR, Stoneley M, Le Quesne JPC, et al. Identification of a motif that mediates polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-dependent internal ribosome entry. Gene Dev. 2005;19:1556–71.
Sherrill KW, Byrd MP, Van Eden ME, Lloyd RE. BCL-2 translation is mediated via internal ribosome entry during cell stress. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:29066–74.
Warnakulasuriyarachchi D, Cerquozzi S, Cheung HH, Holcík M. Translational induction of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein HIAP2 during endoplasmic reticulum stress attenuates cell death and is mediated via an inducible internal ribosome entry site element. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17148–57.
Lang KJD, Kappel A, Goodall GJ, Wickens MP. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α mRNA contains an internal ribosome entry site that allows efficient translation during normoxia and hypoxia. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:1792–801.
Coldwell MJ, DeSchoolmeester ML, Fraser GA, Pickering BM, Packham G, Willis AE. The p36 isoform of BAG-1 is translated by internal ribosome entry following heat shock. Oncogene. 2001;20:4095–4100.
Korneluk RG, Holcik M, Lefebvre C, Chow T, Yeh C. A new internal-ribosome-entry-site motif potentiates XIAP-mediated cytoprotection. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:190–2.
Stein I, Itin A, Einat P, Skaliter R, Grossman Z, Keshet E. Translation of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA by internal ribosome entry: Implications for translation under hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3112–9.
Stoneley M, Paulin FE, Le Quesne JP, Chappell SA, Willis AE. C-Myc 5’ untranslated region contains an internal ribosome entry segment. Oncogene. 1998;16:423–8.
Slotkin RK, Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:272–85.
Schorn AJ, Gutbrod MJ, LeBlanc C, Martienssen R. LTR-retrotransposon control by tRNA-derived small RNAs. Cell. 2017;170:61–71.
Zhou J, Liu S, Chen Y, Fu Y, Silver AJ, Hill MS, et al. Identification of two novel functional tRNA-derived fragments induced in response to respiratory syncytial virus infection. J Gen Virol. 2017;98:1600–10.
Deng J, Ptashkin RN, Chen Y, Cheng Z, Liu G, Phan T, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus utilizes a tRNA fragment to suppress antiviral responses through a novel targeting mechanism. Mol Ther. 2015;23:1622–9.
Ruggero K, Guffanti A, Corradin A, Sharma VK, De Bellis G, Corti G, et al. Small noncoding RNAs in cells transformed by human T-cell leukemia virus Type 1: a role for a tRNA fragment as a primer for reverse transcriptase. J Virol. 2014;88:3612–22.
Lasser C. Mapping extracellular RNA sheds lights on distinct carriers. Cell. 2019;177:228–30.
Tkach M, Thery C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: where we are and where we need to go. Cell. 2016;164:1226–32.
Ratajczak J, Miekus K, Kucia M, Zhang J, Reca R, Dvorak P, et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia. 2006;20:847–56.
Chiou NT, Kageyama R, Ansel KM. Selective export into extracellular vesicles and function of tRNA fragments during T cell activation. Cell Rep. 2018;25:3356–70.
Baglio SR, Rooijers K, Koppers-Lalic D, Verweij FJ, Perez LM, Zini N, et al. Human bone marrow- and adipose-mesenchymal stem cells secrete exosomes enriched in distinctive miRNA and tRNA species. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:127.
Gámbaro F, Li Calzi M, Fagúndez P, Costa B, Greif G, Mallick E, et al. Stable tRNA halves can be sorted into extracellular vesicles and delivered to recipient cells in a concentration-dependent manner. RNA Biol. 2020;17:1168–82.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Zhang M, Li F, Wang J, He W, Li Y, Li H, et al. tRNA-derived fragment tRF-03357 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:6371–83.
Peng EY, Shu Y, Wu Y, Zeng F, Tan S, Deng Y, et al. Presence and diagnostic value of circulating tsncRNA for ovarian tumor. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:163.
Wu Y, Yang X, Jiang G, Zhang H, Ge L, Chen F, et al. 5’-tRF-GlyGCC: a tRNA-derived small RNA as a novel biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Genome Med. 2021;13:20.
Chen Z, Qi M, Shen B, Luo G, Wu Y, Li J, et al. Transfer RNA demethylase ALKBH3 promotes cancer progression via induction of tRNA-derived small RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:2533–45.
Peng H, Shi J, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Liao S, Li W, et al. A novel class of tRNA-derived small RNAs extremely enriched in mature mouse sperm. Cell Res. 2012;22:1609–12.
Li L, Zhang CZ, Liu L, Yi C, Lu S, Zhou X, et al. miR-720 inhibits tumor invasion and migration in breast cancer by targeting TWIST1. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:469–78.
Shao Y, Sun Q, Liu X, Wang P, Wu R, Ma Z. tRF-Leu-CAG promotes cell proliferation and cell cycle in non-small cell lung cancer. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2017;90:730–8.
Tong L, Zhang W, Qu B, Zhang F, Wu Z, Shi J, et al. The tRNA-derived fragment-3017A promotes metastasis by inhibiting NELL2 in human gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;10:570916.
Nientiedt M, Deng M, Schmidt D, Perner S, Müller SC, Ellinger J. Identification of aberrant tRNA-halves expression patterns in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37158.
Kim HK, Fuchs G, Wang S, Wei W, Zhang Y, Park H, et al. A transfer-RNA-derived small RNA regulates ribosome biogenesis. Nature. 2017;552:57–62.
Maute RL, Schneider C, Sumazin P, Holmes A, Califano A, Basso K, et al. tRNA-derived microRNA modulates proliferation and the DNA damage response and is down-regulated in B cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:1404–9.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. We would like to thank Aischolar (www.ais.cn) for English language editing. This study was supported by National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (No. 82072854) and The Project for Key Medicine Discipline Construction of Guangzhou Municipality (No. 2021-2023-17).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.Z. designed and revised the review. J.W. wrote and revised the manuscript. Z.H., Q.L., X.C., and H.Q. revised the contents of the manuscript. J.W. constructed and revised the figures. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be responsible for this review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, Jt., Huang, Zh., Li, Qh. et al. Research progress on the tsRNA classification, function, and application in gynecological malignant tumors. Cell Death Discov. 7, 388 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00789-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00789-2
This article is cited by
-
Metabolism-regulating non-coding RNAs in breast cancer: roles, mechanisms and clinical applications
Journal of Biomedical Science (2024)
-
tRNA-derived small RNAs in human cancers: roles, mechanisms, and clinical application
Molecular Cancer (2024)
-
tiRNA-Val-CAC-2 interacts with FUBP1 to promote pancreatic cancer metastasis by activating c‑MYC transcription
Oncogene (2024)
-
The strict regulation of HIF-1α by non-coding RNAs: new insight towards proliferation, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance strategies
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews (2024)
-
tRNA-derived fragments: mechanism of gene regulation and clinical application in lung cancer
Cellular Oncology (2024)