Introduction
Loss of teeth can be an extremely upsetting event for patients, and concerns around immediate replacement of teeth for aesthetic and functional reasons can weigh heavily on patients' minds.1,2 Replacing missing teeth immediately after extraction, without restrictions for future solutions is clearly attractive for both patients and dentists.3 There are a wide range of options available for immediate placement of teeth (Fig. 1) and in this short article we discuss the options available with relevant advantages and disadvantages and tips on how to optimise outcomes in support of our patients.
Immediate dentures
Immediate dentures, whether complete or partial, are those that are inserted on the same day as the removal of natural teeth.4 This means that patients do not have to endure a waiting period of several weeks for their tissues to heal before receiving their dentures (Fig. 2). By offering immediate dentures to patients, we can swiftly reinstate both their aesthetic appearance and functional capabilities, thereby mitigating the potentially distressing experience of adjusting to tooth loss.
One of the significant advantages of immediate dentures is their ability to closely mimic the patient's natural dentition, including tooth shape, colour, position, arch form, and inter-occlusal relationship. This imitation helps maintain the existing occlusal vertical dimension when done optimally.4 Research studies have also shown that wearing immediate dentures, whether for partial or complete tooth loss, can reduce the rate of alveolar resorption around extraction sites, preserving bone structure.5,6,7
Furthermore, immediate dentures act as a kind of protective ‘plastic bandage'. They help minimise disturbances, trauma, or insults caused by factors like opposing teeth, oral fluids, and food debris, as they are inserted immediately after tooth extraction.8 This approach can enhance the overall patient experience and facilitate a smoother transition to a denture-supported lifestyle.
While immediate dentures offer numerous advantages, it's important to acknowledge that some studies have raised concerns regarding the potential for more issues compared to conventionally constructed dentures, which are made after a healing period.9 Without adequate patient education and information regarding the complex clinical and laboratory procedures, the need for multiple adjustments, and the financial considerations associated with immediate dentures, this facet of care may become a distressing experience for patients.10
-
a.
Unforeseen need for adjustments: It's crucial to keep in mind that predicting the precise pattern of tissue changes following tooth extraction is challenging, and the fitting surfaces of dentures may inadvertently cause discomfort or trauma to healing sockets. However, it's reassuring to know that adjustments can be easily made during follow-up visits.10 Explaining this to patients before treatment can help alleviate unnecessary worry and anxiety.
-
b.
Increased cost and number of visits: The construction of immediate dentures involves more extended periods of both laboratory work and chairside procedures, along with additional appointments for adjustments and relines. This is because both hard and soft tissues undergo changes after tooth loss. In the long run, a definitive denture will also need to be constructed, leading to increased costs for both the dentist and the patient. Informing patients about these stages can assist them in making appropriate financial preparations.10,11
-
c.
Inability to assess aesthetics during the try-in stage: When teeth are extracted simultaneously with the insertion of dentures, there is no opportunity for a prior aesthetic assessment. Consequently, there is a potential risk that patients may not be entirely satisfied with their appearance after the denture placement.8 At best, the aim is to replicate the existing natural tooth arrangement if it is deemed satisfactory.4
Clinical tips
Managing challenges in impressions: During the impression-making process, a common issue arises when dealing with highly mobile teeth, as impression material can become trapped in undercuts, potentially leading to unintended tooth extraction. To address this challenge, clinicians can employ a practical technique. They can block the undercuts temporarily with wax or temporary cement, which can be easily removed after completing the impressions. An alternative approach is to temporarily stabilise the mobile teeth using composite resin until the impressions are successfully completed.11
Preventing seating issues: Seating problems frequently occur in clinical practice because the denture's fitting surface is created on a cast that undergoes modifications by removing teeth slated for extraction. To avoid this issue, a surgical stent made of clear acrylic can be fabricated on the modified cast and utilised during the extraction procedure. This surgical stent helps compress interfering areas and highlights them as blanched areas through the clear acrylic. This technique aids in performing necessary bone contouring and addressing unwanted undercuts before the denture insertion process.11
Post-insertion patient instructions: It's essential to provide clear instructions to patients following denture insertion. Patients should be advised to wear the prosthesis continuously for the initial 24 to 48 hours, as most swelling occurs during this period. Additionally, patients should refrain from rinsing their mouth for several hours after extractions and avoid engaging in strenuous physical activities during this time.10,11
Essix type retainers with tooth
In certain situations, patients may seek a temporary yet immediate solution to address their missing teeth, with the intention of pursuing a permanent restoration later. For instance, individuals undergoing conventional implant treatment typically face a waiting period of 3-6 months before moving to the prosthetic phase. During this waiting period it is crucial to maintain the space and provide an aesthetically pleasing and functional interim solution. This is where a temporary immediate prosthesis, such as an Essix appliance, becomes a valuable consideration.12,13
The Essix appliance is crafted from a clear thermoplastic sheet, and it incorporates an acrylic tooth to effectively replace the missing tooth. One of the primary advantages of this appliance is that it relies on the existing teeth for support and exerts no pressure on the surgical site. It is particularly suitable for cases where there is limited interocclusal space or a deep anterior overbite.12 However, it is important to note that this type of provisional restoration is not intended for prolonged use, as it may experience wear and could become uncomfortable for the patient due to its coverage of the remaining natural teeth (Fig. 3).
Clinical tips
Maintenance: Emphasising the importance of properly cleaning the appliance is important as the thermoplastic sheet can lodge bacteria and lead to malodour and discolouration.13 Advise the patient to brush the retainer with a soft bristle brush and to use retainer cleaning tablets regularly.
Immediate resin-bonded bridge (IRBB)
Resin-retained bridges are now widely acknowledged as a practical alternative to conventional fixed partial dentures (FPD). An IRBB offers a minimally invasive solution for fixed tooth replacement while preserving the structural integrity of the abutment teeth14 (Fig. 4). This option holds particular appeal for young patients grappling with early anterior tooth loss. In such cases, choosing a conventional FPD with extensive tooth preparation may introduce the risk of endodontic complications.14 Without the IRBB alternative, patients might be faced with the prospect of wearing dentures for an extended period until they reach a stage where growth has ceased, making them eligible for implants or definitive bridges.15
Furthermore, IRBB can be an excellent choice for patients who are unable to commit to multiple appointments but still desire teeth replacement to avoid aesthetic concerns. It's important to acknowledge that the primary cause of failure in this type of prosthesis is typically debonding, often driven by complex multidirectional stresses among abutments, especially in the case of 3-unit IRBBs.16 To tackle this issue, the utilisation of two-unit cantilever IRBB has gained popularity. This approach minimises the generation of complex forces on the prosthesis and reduces stress on the single abutment, thus lowering the likelihood of debonding.
Clinical tips
Preventing debonding: To prevent debonding, it is essential to secure extensive coverage of the lingual or palatal enamel with the retainer, incorporate a rigid connector with a minimum height of 4 mm, and adhere to a rigorous bonding protocol utilising a cement containing 10-MDP, such as Panavia V5.17,18
Occlusal considerations: The effectiveness of this prosthesis hinges significantly on a thorough evaluation of both centric and eccentric occlusal relationships. It is imperative to consistently instruct the laboratory technician to utilise articulated casts and evaluate the palatal aspect to determine the interocclusal space available for the retainer wings and pontics. Ensuring that the pontic does not impede mandibular excursive movements is of utmost importance. If achieving this proves challenging, exploring the possibility of sharing guidance with adjacent natural teeth should be considered.17
When to seek dental attention: In cases where a fixed-fixed IRBB has been utilised, it's imperative to warn patients about the risk of one retainer debonding. They should be encouraged to report any looseness in the bridge immediately. Failure to do so may result in caries developing beneath the debonded retainer, which could jeopardise the prognosis of the abutment tooth.17
Immediate fibre-reinforced composite bridge (IFRCB)
The IFRCB represents a minimal-invasive and immediate solution for situations where one or more teeth require replacement. This prosthetic option is notably conservative, aesthetically pleasing, cost-effective, and offers a ‘quick-fix' for tooth replacement, achievable in a single session using the chairside direct method.3 It serves as an excellent alternative for emergency tooth replacements, temporary replacements following implant placement, and for patients with budget constraints who cannot afford a conventional fixed partial denture.3,19
In IFRCBs, pontics can be crafted from natural extracted teeth, acrylic resin teeth, or composite resin. To secure the pontic to adjacent teeth, a bondable fibre-reinforced material is utilised. The success of IFRCBs hinges on good oral hygiene practices and maintaining a dry operating field.19
Clinical tips
Bonding to metal or porcelain: When bonding fibres to porcelain or metal, it's important to be mindful of the potential for debonding. The use of metal and porcelain primers can enhance bond strength and improve the reliability of the attachment.19
Occlusal considerations: Similar to IRBBs, occlusal considerations are of paramount importance for the success of IFRCBs. Ensuring adequate interocclusal space is essential prior to planning this prosthesis to guarantee its functionality and longevity.3
Immediate implant placement
In the field of dentistry, a notable trend has emerged wherein dentists increasingly opt for immediate implant placement immediately following the extraction of a compromised tooth.20,21 This approach effectively bypasses the traditional waiting period of 4-6 months post-extraction, which is typically required for new bone formation. Moreover, immediate implant placement has demonstrated advantages, including reduced crestal bone loss compared to delayed implant procedures.21
Furthermore, this method offers the benefits of swifter and more predictable healing, as osseointegration aligns seamlessly with the natural healing process.20,21 Importantly, the preserved anatomy of the extracted tooth socket necessitates minimal preparation during immediate implant placement, closely resembling the structure of root-form implants.
Clinical tips
Patient selection: Thoughtful treatment planning is essential when considering immediate implant placement. Careful case selection is paramount. Patients lacking sufficient bone apical to the socket, those in close proximity to critical structures like the mandibular neurovascular bundle, maxillary sinus, or nasal cavity, and those with unfavourable anatomical configurations of the remaining bone should be considered contraindications for immediate implant placement.20
Extraction technique: To ensure the success of immediate implant placement, the tooth must be extracted with utmost care and minimal trauma. This approach is vital for preserving the integrity of the buccal and lingual plates of the extraction socket.21
Osteotomy site preparation: Optimal implant primary stability can be achieved by engaging the apical 3 mm of virgin bone beneath the extraction socket. In cases where radiographs reveal periapical infection, it is advisable to perform socket curettage followed by immediate implant placement.20
Cost considerations: Patients should be informed of potential additional costs associated with the possibility of requiring graft placement. Transparent communication about these potential expenses is crucial to ensure patients are well-informed when making decisions about their treatment.
See Figure 5.
Conclusion
This article explores several options for the immediate replacement of missing teeth. Through comprehensive patient assessments, well-considered treatment planning, and precise clinical techniques, these prosthetic choices can offer immediate solutions to restore both aesthetics and functionality effectively.
Top tips are intended as a series of experiential tips, rather than a compendium of the evidence.
References
DDU. Guide to consent to dental treatment. September 2022. Available at: https://www.theddu.com/guidance-and-advice/guides/quick-guide-to-consent (accessed September 2023)
General Dental Council. Standards for the dental team. Principle Three: Obtain valid consent.2013. Available at: https://standards.gdc-uk.org/pages/principle3/principle3.aspx (accessed September 2023).
Perrin P, Meyer-Lueckel H, Wierichs R J. Longevity of immediate rehabilitation with direct fiber reinforced composite fixed partial dentures after up to 9 years. J Dent 2020; doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103438.
St George G, Hussain S, Welfare R. Immediate dentures: 1. Treatment planning. Dent Update 2010; 37: 82-91.
Johnson K. A three year study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following immediate denture treatment. Aust Dent J 1967; 12: 152−159.
Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following closed face immediate denture treatment. Aust Dent J 1977; 22: 393−396.
Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following open face immediate denture treatment. Aust Dent J 1977; 22: 451−454.
Haeberle C B. Clinical considerations for delivery of immediate dentures. Decisions in Dentistry 2019; 5: 36-41.
Beck C B, Bates J F, Basker R M, Gutteridge D L, Harrison A. A survey of the dissatisfied denture patient. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1993; 2: 73-78.
Seals R R Jr, Kuebker W A, Stewart K L. Immediate complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am 1996; 40: 151-167.
St George G, Lewis N J, Malton C, Welfare R. Immediate dentures: 2. Clinical stages of construction. Dent Update 2010; 37: 154-160.
Patel A, Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Patel J R. Essix restoration: a novel approach for transitional teeth replacement. BMJ Case Rep 2014; doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-200422 bcr2013200422.
Lally U. A simple technique for replacing extracted anterior teeth using a vacuum formed retainer. J Ir De Assoc 2013; 59: 258-260
Darbar U R, Hemmings K W, King P A. An immediate resin-bonded bridge using the natural tooth. Dent Update 1995; 22: 288-290.
Al-Wahadni A M, Al-Omari W M. Immediate resin-bonded bridgework: results of a medium-term clinical follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 90-94.
Prashanti E, Sajjan S, Kumar M. Comparison of stress patterns and displacement in conventional cantilever fixed partial denture with resin bonded cantilever fixed partial denture: a finite element analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21: 59-62.
Durey K A, Nixon P J, Robinson S, Chan M F. Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success. Br Dent J 2011; 211: 113-118.
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto C M, Paula A, Coelho A S. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability - a systematic review. Materials (Basel) 2019; doi: 10.3390/ma12050790.
Van Rensburg J J. Fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) bridge - a minimally destructive approach. Dent Update 2015; 42: 360-366.
Ebenezer V, Balakrishnan K, Asir R V, Sragunar B. Immediate placement of endosseous implants into the extraction sockets. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015; doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155926.
Lazzara R J. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989; 9: 332-343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eachempati, P., McColl, E. Top tips for the immediate replacement of teeth. Br Dent J 235, 846–849 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6647-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-6647-2