We thank Dr. Sun and colleagues for their timely, clinically relevant perspective on how dynamic access to pharmacogenomic testing results is critical to ensure this new knowledge can optimize the potential to inform clinical decision making. There is agreement that for clinical decision support tools to have maximal utility, electronic health record (EHR) functionality must focus on an electronic interface, ideally not an electronic file, which facilitates easy access to the data beyond the ordering clinician and allows for updates of new pharmacogenomic variants and antidepressants. Hard copy paper reports loaded into a media section or static laboratory reports without capacity to add new knowledge will quickly become non-current and likely lost in the EHR.
Recent survey research has investigated primary care providers’ knowledge, clinical use, and impression of clinician decision support tools, both pharmacogenomic testing results and automatic alerts of genetic variants viewed as clinically actionable. Overall, more than 50% of clinicians did not expect to use pharmacogenomic information in their future practice and similarly, 50% found alerts (i.e., 2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype) confusing and difficult to find additional information [1]. Concerted efforts towards a more efficient user-friendly interface are highly encouraged as single genetic variants that are categorized as poor or ultra-rapid metabolizer phenotypes are clinically actionable today; both cytochrome P450 2D6 poor and ultra-rapid metabolizer phenotypes have been associated with significant higher rates of either poor pain control or adverse drug related event to opioid medication [2] and risk of hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visit (ultra-rapid only) [3]. While these studies are not specifically psychiatric patients or antidepressants, future mechanistic studies of the association of these variants and hospital outcome measures usually monitored by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) are valuable at both and the individual and population-based level.
While there are certainly single pharmacodynamic genetic variants for black box warnings that are relevant to clinical practice in mood disorders today (i.e. Stephens Johnsons Syndrome, HLA-B*1502 variation, carbamazepine and QTc prolongation, 2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype, fluoxetine), clinical studies of decision support tools for a full cadre of various antidepressants do not reach the level of clinical evidence. Sun and colleagues reference a 2019 meta-analysis of pharmacogenomic guided antidepressant selection vs treatment as usual including five randomized controlled trials that encompassed 1737 participants [4]. The results of this meta-analysis suggested the benefit of pharmacogenomic testing on remission rates [relative risk 1.71 (95% CI: 1.17–2.48; p = 0.005)]. Since this publication, however, PRIME CARE, the largest controlled study to date that enrolled 1944 participants, more than the five studies of the meta-analysis combined, did not achieve significance on their co-primary outcome measure -predicted drug-gene interaction prescription and remission of depression [5]. Moreover, a comprehensive review of pharmacogenomic testing to predict antidepressant efficacy or side effects concluded that there is no current utility for any of the commercially available tests [6].
New drug therapies and ever evolving genetic variants and technology will dynamically advance current conventional decision support tools. When and how to scale these tools in an optimal EHR interface for treatment selection of antidepressants for major depressive disorder remain unclear.
References
St Sauver JL, Bielinski SJ, Olson JE, Bell EJ, Mc Gree ME, Jacobson DJ, et al. Integrating Pharmacogenomics into Clinical Practice: Promise vs Reality. Am J Med. 2016;129:1093–.e1.
St Sauver JL, Olson JE, Roger VL, Nicholson WT, Black JL, Takahashi PY, et al. CYP2D6 phenotypes are associated with adverse outcomes related to opioid medications. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2017;10:217–27.
Takahashi PY, Ryu E, Pathak J, Jenkins GD, Batzler A, Hathcock MA, et al. Increased risk of hospitalization for ultrarapid metabolizers of cytochrome P450 2D6. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2017;10:39–47.
Bousman CA, Arandjelovic K, Mancuso SG, Eyre HA, Dunlop BW. Pharmacogenetic tests and depressive symptom remission: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacogenomics 2019;20:37–47.
Oslin DW, Lynch KG, Shih M-C, Ingram EP, Wray LO, Chapman SR, et al. Effect of Pharmacogenomic Testing for Drug-Gene Interactions on Medication Selection and Remission of Symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder: The PRIME Care Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022;328:151–61.
Baum MWA, Carpenter L, McDonald W, Cohen B, Nemeroff CB. On behalf of the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Workgroup on Biomarkers and Novel Treatments. AM J Psychiatry. 2024.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MAF: writing, reviewing, and editing final response. Charles B. Nemeroff: writing, reviewing, and editing final response.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
MAF, M.D. 2023. Grant Support: Assurex Health, Mayo Foundation, Breakthrough Discoveries for Thriving with Bipolar Disorder (BD2). Speakers’ Bureau: NONE. CME/Travel/Honoraria: Carnot Laboratories, American Physician Institute. Financial Interest / Stock ownership / Royalties: Chymia LLC. CBN M.D., Ph.D. Research/Grants: National Institutes of Health (NIH). Consulting: AbbVie, ANeuroTech (division of Anima BV), Signant Health, Magstim, Inc., Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc., EMA Wellness, Sage, Silo Pharma, Engrail Therapeutics, Pasithea Therapeutic Corp., GoodCap Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Senseye, Clexio, Ninnion Therapeutics, EmbarkNeuro, SynapseBio, BioXcel Therapeutics, Relmada Therapeutics. Stockholder: Seattle Genetics, Antares, Inc., Corcept Therapeutics Pharmaceuticals Company, EMA Wellness, Naki Health, Relmada Therapeutics. Scientific Advisory Boards: ANeuroTech (division of Anima BV), Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (BBRF), Anxiety and Depression Association of America (ADAA), Skyland Trail, Signant Health, Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Inc., Heading Health, Pasithea Therapeutic Corp., Sage. Board of Directors: Gratitude America, ADAA, Lucy Scientific Discovery, Inc. Patents: Method and devices for transdermal delivery of lithium (US 6,375,990B1); Method of assessing antidepressant drug therapy via transport inhibition of monoamine neurotransmitters by ex vivo assay (US 7,148,027B2). Speakers Bureau: None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Frye, M.A., Nemeroff, C.B. Reply to Sun: Dynamic and accessible pharmacogenomic results: a response to pharmacogenomic testing for antidepressant treatment selection. Neuropsychopharmacol. 49, 770–771 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-024-01815-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-024-01815-4