Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Are novel treatments for brain disorders hiding in plain sight?

Abstract

Psychiatric diseases are strongly influenced by genetics, but genetically guided treatments have been slow to develop, and precise molecular mechanisms remain mysterious. Although individual locations in the genome tend to not contribute powerfully to psychiatric disease incidence, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have now successfully linked hundreds of specific genetic loci to psychiatric disorders [1,2,3]. Here, building upon results from well-powered GWAS of four phenotypes relevant to psychiatry, we motivate an exploratory workflow leading from GWAS screening, through causal testing in animal models using methods such as optogenetics, to new therapies in human beings. We focus on schizophrenia and the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2), hot flashes and the neurokinin B receptor (TACR3), cigarette smoking and receptors bound by nicotine (CHRNA5, CHRNA3, CHRNB4), and alcohol use and enzymes that help to break down alcohol (ADH1B, ADH1C, ADH7). A single genomic locus may not powerfully determine disease at the level of the population, but the same locus may nevertheless represent a potent treatment target suitable for population-wide therapeutic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Selected schizophrenia and hot flash GWAS results have mechanistic and pharmacological relevance.
Fig. 2: Cigarettes per day and alcohol per week GWAS reveal mechanistically relevant genes in top loci.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Throughout this manuscript we refer to genome-wide studies, singular and plural, as GWAS. GWAS have historically been conducted using array-based (“chip”) technology but sequencing-based genome-wide studies are increasingly common as sequencing costs decrease.

  2. Note that the presence of significant variants in the DRD2 gene does not necessarily imply that variation in DRD2 genotypes influences schizophrenia risk; functional studies would be needed to conclusively establish this link.

  3. The linking of loci to genes constitutes an entire field of research. There is no field-wide consensus regarding the best approach, since much remains unknown about the function of individual genes and their regulation by genetic elements within and outside of genes. Leading approaches include nearest gene, MAGMA gene-level p value, and numerous fine-mapping approaches.

References

  1. Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90:7–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Visscher PM, Wray NR, Zhang Q, Sklar P, McCarthy MI, Brown MA, et al. 10 years of GWAS discovery: biology, function, and translation. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101:5–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdellaoui A, Yengo L, Verweij KJH, Visscher PM. 15 years of GWAS discovery: realizing the promise. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110:179–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Trubetskoy V, Pardiñas AF, Qi T, Panagiotaropoulou G, Awasthi S, Bigdeli TB, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature. 2022;604:502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Crandall CJ, Manson JE, Hohensee C, Horvath S, Wactawski-Wende J, LeBlanc ES, et al. Association of genetic variation in the tachykinin receptor 3 locus with hot flashes and night sweats in the Women’s Health Initiative Study. Menopause. 2017;24:252–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Meijsen JJ, Shen H, Vemuri M, Rasgon NL, Koenen KC, Duncan LE. Shared genetic influences on depression and menopause symptoms. Psychol Med. 2023;53:2241–51.

  7. Saunders GRB, Wang X, Chen F, Jang S-K, Liu M, Wang C, et al. Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use. Nature. 2022;612:720–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Seeman P. Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action. Focus. 2004;2:48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapur S, Remington G. Dopamine D2 receptors and their role in atypical antipsychotic action: still necessary and may even be sufficient. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;50:873–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huhn M, Nikolakopoulou A, Schneider-Thoma J, Krause M, Samara M, Peter N, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394:939–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zalocusky KA, Ramakrishnan C, Lerner TN, Davidson TJ, Knutson B, Deisseroth K. Nucleus accumbens D2R cells signal prior outcomes and control risky decision-making. Nature. 2016;531:642–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ryan A, Burnell M, Lanceley A, Fraser L, et al. Prevalence, frequency and problem rating of hot flushes persist in older postmenopausal women: impact of age, body mass index, hysterectomy, hormone therapy use, lifestyle and mood in a cross-sectional cohort study of 10 418 British women aged 54–65. BJOG. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119:40–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. UK Parliament H of CC report. Menopause and the workplace. 2022.

  14. Rance NE, Dacks PA, Mittelman-Smith MA, Romanovsky AA, Krajewski-Hall SJ. Modulation of body temperature and LH secretion by hypothalamic KNDy (kisspeptin, neurokinin B and dynorphin) neurons: a novel hypothesis on the mechanism of hot flushes. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2013;34:211–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Padilla SL, Johnson CW, Barker FD, Patterson MA, Palmiter RD. A neural circuit underlying the generation of hot flushes. Cell Rep. 2018;24:271–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fraser GL, Lederman S, Waldbaum A, Kroll R, Santoro N, Lee M, et al. A phase 2b, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-ranging study of the neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist fezolinetant for vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. Menopause. 2020;27:382–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Prague JK, Roberts RE, Comninos AN, Clarke S, Jayasena CN, Nash Z, et al. Neurokinin 3 receptor antagonism as a novel treatment for menopausal hot flushes: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:1809–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 clinical study to investigate the long-term safety of fezolinetant in women suffering from vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) associated with menopause. clinicaltrials.gov; 2023.

  19. Tahara A, Takamatsu H, Ohtake A, Tanaka-Amino K, Kaku S. Effects of neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist fezolinetant on hot flash-like symptoms in ovariectomized rats. Eur J Pharm. 2021;905:174207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuckit MA. Comorbidity between substance use disorders and psychiatric conditions. Addiction. 2006;101:76–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdellaoui A, Smit DJA, van den Brink W, Denys D, Verweij KJH. Genomic relationships across psychiatric disorders including substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;220:108535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinnott-Armstrong N, Naqvi S, Rivas M, Pritchard JK. GWAS of three molecular traits highlights core genes and pathways alongside a highly polygenic background. ELife. 2021;10:e58615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Howard DM, Adams MJ, Clarke T-K, Hafferty JD, Gibson J, Shirali M, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ochoa D, Karim M, Ghoussaini M, Hulcoop DG, McDonagh EM, Dunham I. Human genetics evidence supports two-thirds of the 2021 FDA-approved drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:551–551.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor LJ, Schoech AP, Hormozdiari F, Gazal S, Patterson N, Price AL. Extreme polygenicity of complex traits is explained by negative selection. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105:456–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Keller MC, Miller G. Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behav Brain Sci. 2006;29:385–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature. 2016;536:285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) for the vision, perseverance, and international collaboration necessary to create a well-powered psychiatric GWAS. We thank Katy Werwath, Kevina Wang, Ciera Stafford, and Hanyang Shen for help with this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIMH grants to LD (R01 MH123486, R21 MH125358) and the Jaswa Innovator Award. KD is supported by NIDA, NIMH, and the BRAIN Initiative. Funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, in the collection and analysis of data, or in decisions regarding publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LD and KD were responsible for the conception, drafting, and revision of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Laramie Duncan or Karl Deisseroth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

LD has no competing interests. KD is a cofounder and consultant for Maplight Therapeutics.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duncan, L., Deisseroth, K. Are novel treatments for brain disorders hiding in plain sight?. Neuropsychopharmacol. 49, 276–281 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01636-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01636-x

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links