Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Chorionicity and neurodevelopmental outcomes in twin pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

Through a systematic review and meta-analyses, we aimed to analyze the impact of chorionicity on neurodevelopment outcomes.

Study design

We conducted a comprehensive search strategy through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and reference lists of the retrieved studies until August 2022. Studies that examined the association between chorionicity and children’s neurodevelopment outcomes were included.

Results

Twelve studies were included. Monochorionic (MC) twins increased the odds of neurodevelopment impairment, cerebral palsy compared to dichorionic (DC) twins. The differences in neurodevelopmental impairment and cerebral palsy between the two groups disappeared after excluding infants with twin-twin transfusion (TTTS). After fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for MC twins, there were no differences too.

Conclusions

Compared to DC twins, MC twins were associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopment impairment. MC twins complicated by TTTS were at high risk of neurologic disability, and FLS was an acceptable treatment modality for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flow diagram.
Fig. 2: Forest plots.
Fig. 3: Forset plot.
Fig. 4: Forest plot.
Fig. 5: Forest plot.
Fig. 6: Forest plot.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to FZ.

References

  1. Lopriore E, Lewi L, Khalil A. Monochorionic twins: a delicate balance. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1711.

  2. Lugthart MA, Horenblas J, Kleinrouweler EC, Engels M, Knegt AC, Huijsdens K, et al. Prenatal sonographic features can accurately determine parental origin in triploid pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40:705–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jha P, Morgan TA, Kennedy A. US evaluation of twin pregnancies: importance of chorionicity and amnionicity. Radiographics 2019;39:2146–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feng B, Zhai J, Cai Y. Effect of twin pregnancy chorionic properties on maternal and fetal outcomes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57:351–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Mascio D, Acharya G, Khalil A, Odibo A, Prefumo F, Liberati M, et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98:1245–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosinska-Kaczynska K, Szymusik I, Bomba-Opon D, Olejek A, Slawska H, Zimmer M, et al. Perinatal outcome according to chorionicity in twins - a Polish multicenter study. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87:384–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Homola W, Florjanski J, Krolak-Olejnik B, Fuchs T, Lachowska M, Bek W. The impact of chorionicity and the type of twin growth on the early neonatal outcome in twin pregnancies − 20 years of experience from one tertiary perinatal center. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;58:482–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park YH, Kim YN, Im DH, Kim DH, Byun JM, Jeong DH, et al. Neonatal outcomes between discordant monochorionic and dichorionic twins. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34:2080–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajagopalan V, Ashouri K, Llanes A, Vanderbilt DL, Lepore N, Bluml S, et al. Fetal neurodevelopmental recovery in donors after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41:190–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Garcia S, Kakaizada S, Oleaga L, Benet A, Rincon-Toroella J, Gonzalez-Sanchez JJ. Presurgical simulation for neuroendoscopic procedures: virtual study of the integrity of neurological pathways using diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Neurol India. 2019;67:763–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deopujari C, Shaikh S. Presurgical simulation for neuroendoscopic procedures to virtually study the integrity of neurological pathways using diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Neurol India. 2019;67:770–1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tober C, Schoop R. Modulation of neurological pathways by Salvia officinalis and its dependence on manufacturing process and plant parts used. BMC Complement Alter Med. 2019;19:128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Owen MJ, O’Donovan MC. Schizophrenia and the neurodevelopmental continuum: evidence from genomics. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halling C, Malone FD, Breathnach FM, Stewart MC, Mcauliffe FM, Morrison JJ, et al. Neuro-developmental outcome of a large cohort of growth discordant twins. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:381–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Christensen R, Chau V, Synnes A, Grunau RE, Miller SP. Longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm twins. Pediatr Res. 2021;90:593–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hack KE, Koopman-Esseboom C, Derks JB, Elias SG, de Kleine MJ, Baerts W, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins. Plos One. 2009;4:e6815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ichinomiya K, Maruyama K, Koizumi A, Inoue F, Fukuda K, Kaburagi K, et al. Comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes between monochorionic and dichorionic twins with birth weight ≤ 1500 g in Japan: a register-based cohort study. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruegg L, Husler M, Krahenmann F, Zimmermann R, Natalucci G, Ochsenbein-Kolble N. Long-term outcome of monochorionic twins after fetoscopic laser therapy compared to matched dichorionic twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47:947–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sommer J, Nuyt AM, Audibert F, Dorval V, Wavrant S, Altit G, et al. Outcomes of extremely premature infants with twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by laser therapy. J Perinatol. 2018;38:1548–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:247–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Di Toro F, Gjoka M, Di Lorenzo G, De Santo D, De Seta F, Maso G, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27:36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bolch C, Fahey M, Reddihough D, Williams K, Reid S, Guzys A, et al. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome neurodevelopmental follow-up study (neurodevelopmental outcomes for children whose twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome was treated with placental laser photocoagulation). BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gajawelli N, Deoni S, Shi J, Linguraru MG, Porras AR, Nelson MD, et al. Neurocranium thickness mapping in early childhood. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Osterman M, Hamilton B, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: final data for 2020. Natl Vital- Stat Rep. 2021;70:1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Norris JM, Simpson BS, Ball R, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Parry MA, et al. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessment of study quality in genetic urological research. Eur Urol. 2021;79:325–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tosello B, Garbi A, Blanc J, Lorthe E, Foix L, Hélias L, et al. The impact of chorionicity on pregnancy outcome and neurodevelopment at 2 years old among twins born preterm: the EPIPAGE‐2 cohort study. BJOG. 2021;128:281–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kawamura H, Ishii K, Yonetani N, Mabuchi A, Hayashi S, Mitsuda N. Significance of chorionicity on long-term outcome of low birthweight infants of <1500g in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Re. 2015;41:1185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adegbite AL, Castille S, Ward S, Bajoria R. Neuromorbidity in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:156–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asztalos EV, Barrett JFR, Lacy M, Luther M. Evaluating 2 year outcome in twins ≤ 30 weeks gestation at birth: a regional perinatal unit’s experience. Twin Res. 2001;4:431–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Minakami H, Honma Y, Matsubara S, Uchida A, Shiraishi H, Sato I. Effects of placental chorionicity on outcome in twin pregnancies. A cohort study. J Reprod Med. 1999;44:595–600.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taborda A, Oliveira G. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm or very low birth weigth infants: comparison of monochorionic and dichorionic twins with singletons. Acta Med Port. 2016;29:702–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Childhood neurological disorders in twins. Paediatr Perinat Ep. 1995;9:135–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lenclen R, Ciarlo G, Paupe A, Bussieres L, Ville Y. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in children born preterm treated by amnioreduction or fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison with dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aoki S, Hashimoto K, Ikeda N, Takekoh M, Fujiwara T, Morisaki N, et al. Comparison of the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development 2001 with the parent-rated Kinder Infant Development Scale (KIDS). Brain Dev. 2016;38:481–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gould JF, Hunt E, Roberts RM, Louise J, Collins CT, Makrides M. Can the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 18 months predict child behaviour at 7 years? J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55:74-81.

  38. Wang H, Du Y, Mao Z, Che Y, Li H, Ding L, et al. Use of the Griffiths mental development scale-Chinese in the assessment of children with autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay/intellectual disability. Med (Baltim). 2021;100:e25407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Castro S, Coelho V, Pinto A. Identification of functional domains in developmental measures: an ICF-CY analysis of Griffiths developmental scales and Schedule of Growing Skills II. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19:231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schonhaut L, Martinez-Nadal S, Armijo I, Demestre X. Reliability and agreement of ages and stages questionnaires(R): results in late preterm and term-born infants at 24 and 48months. Early Hum Dev. 2019;128:55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marceau K, Mcmaster MT, Smith TF, Daams JG, van Beijsterveldt CE, Boomsma DI, et al. The prenatal environment in twin studies: a review on chorionicity. Behav Genet. 2016;46:286–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ. Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient. BMJ 1998;317:1481–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Edmonds CJ, Isaacs EB, Cole TJ, Rogers MH, Lanigan J, Singhal A, et al. The effect of intrauterine growth on verbal IQ scores in childhood: a study of monozygotic twins. Pediatrics 2010;126:e1095–e1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Campos D, Arias AV, Campos-Zanelli TM, Souza DS, Dos SNO, Peralta CF, et al. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome: neurodevelopment of infants treated with laser surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2016;74:307–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brandsma FL, Spruijt MS, Rijken M, Tan R, Oepkes D, Lopriore E, et al. Behavioural outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome survivors treated with laser surgery. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105:304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aita M, De Clifford FG, Lavallee A, Feeley N, Stremler R, Rioux E, et al. Effectiveness of interventions on early neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Collins RN, Lyle RE, Rettiganti M, Gossett JM, Robbins JM, Casey PH. Long-term neurodevelopment of low-birthweight, preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus. J Pediatr. 2018;203:170–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu F, Mak A, Chan NM, Siu KL, Ma T, Leung KY. Prospective risk of stillbirth and neonatal complications for monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic twins after 24 weeks of gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47:3127–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Siqueiros SM, Falck-Ytter T, Kennedy DP, Bolte S, Lichtenstein P, D’Onofrio BM, et al. Volitional eye movement control and ADHD traits: a twin study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61:1309–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Glanc P, Nyberg DA, Khati NJ, Deshmukh SP, Dudiak KM, Henrichsen TL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Multiple Gestations. J Am Coll Radio. 2017;14:S476–S489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Goel D, Luig M, Maheshwari R, D’Cruz D, Goyen TA. General movement assessment and neurodevelopmental trajectory in extremely preterm infants with hypothyroxinaemia of prematurity (THOP). Early Hum Dev. 2020;144:104886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Funding of Science and Technology Program of Nantong City under Grant [MS12020036] and under Grant [MS12021040].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SHY designed the study, conducted literature searches, study selections, and data extractions, and drafted the initial manuscript. YW and ZFC conducted literature searches, study selections, and data extractions. FZ reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, S., Wang, Y., Chen, Z. et al. Chorionicity and neurodevelopmental outcomes in twin pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol 43, 133–146 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01534-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01534-y

Search

Quick links