The rising prevalence of overweight/obesity and refractory racial/ethnic disparities demand the rapid implementation of innovative, comprehensive policy changes paired with rigorous evaluation to accelerate the broad adoption and prioritization of the most effective and equitable policies [1]. Sanchez-Vaznaugh et al. apply an equity lens to offer important insight into the additive effects of federal and state policies regarding in-school nutrition standards [2]. Specifically, they found that overweight/obesity prevalence among California 5th and 7th graders improved after the initiation of state-level policies regulating food and beverages sold in schools, with further improvement following federal policies regulating meals provided in schools. Although they highlighted severe and persistent racial/ethnic disparities, they observed greater improvements in overweight/obesity among Black and Latino children relative to other groups. The urgency of understanding the effectiveness of interventions for childhood overweight/obesity has never been higher, given alarming indications that prevalence of and disparities within pediatric overweight/obesity may be worsening during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [3].

Past research led by Sanchez-Vaznaugh et al. demonstrated that California state policies regulating foods and beverages sold in schools had a greater positive impact on pediatric overweight/obesity among children at schools in socioeconomically advantaged versus disadvantaged neighborhoods [4]. It is, therefore, encouraging to see that the more recent state and federal policies examined in this issue were associated with a reduction in disparities and appear to have preferentially benefited children in populations disproportionately affected by overweight/obesity. Further research exploring how and why these policies yielded different impacts on these populations may provide important insight to inform future policy development.

The authors appropriately temper their conclusions by noting that school food policies, while important, are insufficient on their own to reduce disparities. Kumanyika developed a framework for designing and evaluating obesity prevention efforts to maximize impact on disparities [5]. The framework’s four pillars—increasing healthy options, reducing deterrents, improving social and economic resources, and building on community capacity—demand comprehensive, multi-level interventions to change the policies, systems, and environmental factors rooted in structural racism, which drive disparities in overweight/obesity [6].

Promising evidence-based options to mitigate disparities in childhood overweight/obesity include efforts to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake, promote healthy behaviors through affordable summer programming, and modify the built environment in low-income neighborhoods. Despite policy measures enacted to limit SSB intake across various settings, the majority of 5–17 year-old drink SSB daily, with the highest intake among Latino and Black youth, a pattern which is likely driven by targeted marketing to these groups [7]. Equity-focused policies to replace children’s SSB intake with water include: eliminating SSB marketing to children, SSB taxes, SSB warning labels, mandating the availability of water in schools and childcare settings, and revising federally-funded nutrition programs by restricting use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds to purchase SSB coupled with incentives for fruit and vegetable purchases and eliminating juice allowances from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children [8]. Offering affordable structured summertime programming that encourages healthy behaviors, including healthier eating, more physical activity, and less screen time, may mitigate the accelerated weight gain observed among children during summer school breaks [9]. To best promote equity, such programming should be located within neighborhoods where children are at greatest risk of developing overweight/obesity. Last, children’s built environments, including park accessibility, safety, and presence and quality of sidewalks, may protect against pediatric overweight/obesity by facilitating no-cost physical activity. However, these benefits are modified by local contextual factors such as safety and the size and quality of recreational spaces [10]. Creative and accessible solutions, such as temporarily closing streets, may effectively increase children’s physical activity [11]. Importantly, community-based interventions must be developed with community input and engagement to shape the planning process from the very beginning.

Cost is certainly an important consideration in intervention selection, and cost-effectiveness models have suggested the cost-saving potential of three primary prevention interventions: an excise tax on SSB, eliminating tax deductions on unhealthy foods marketed to children, and standards for food and drink sold in schools [12]. While an external stakeholder group advised the investigators on topics including equity, Gortmaker et al.’s simulation results are based on the US population as a whole. Models are needed that specifically examine differential cost-effectiveness among populations disproportionately affected by overweight/obesity to guide identification of the most impactful, efficient, and equitable policies.

If policy changes are to have the desired impact on the obesity epidemic, policymakers should consider the wider lens of equity to ensure that policies will be most effective against the historic and ongoing structural racism driving many of the disparities seen in pediatric overweight/obesity. While school nutrition policies are certainly needed, and may have somewhat narrowed disparities in pediatric overweight/obesity, they alone are insufficient and must be part of a broader policy package developed specifically to eliminate disparities.