Abstract
The focus of clinical genetics, and thus genetic counselling, is forecast to expand from the diagnosis and prediction of rare, often untreatable conditions, to the prediction of common, often treatable or preventable conditions1. Whether this evolution is likely to proceed rapidly or at a pace that permits sensible integration of molecular genetic tools is unknown and a source of debate2,3. It is clear, however, that genetic discoveries will modify the way in which disease and risk are conceptualized. Here, we predict how genetic counselling, specifically for more common diseases, might be provided in the decades to come. We envisage an expansion of professional roles and expertise for many health care providers and highlight the need for counselling practices to become more evidence based. Although we support an evidentiary-based approach to the integration of genetic testing into practice, genetic advance is unlikely to occur in an orderly and standardized manner within countries, much less among different countries and health care systems4. Geneticists will become increasingly involved in professional education and policy-making regarding genetic testing and screening programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Training Genetic Counsellors to Deliver an Innovative Therapeutic Intervention: their Views and Experience of Facilitating Multi‐Family Discussion Groups
Journal of Genetic Counseling Open Access 10 October 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Bell, J. The new genetics: the new genetics in clinical practice. Br. Med. J. 316, 618–620 (1998).
Holtzman, N.A. What is (going) to be done? in Proceed with Caution: Predicting Genetic Risks in the Recombinant DNA Era 232–247 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1989).
Kinmonth, A.L., Reinhard, J., Bobrow, M. & Pauker, S. The new genetics. Implications for clinical services in Britain and the United States. Br. Med. J. 316, 767–770 (1998).
Wilfond, B.S. & Nolan, K. National policy development for the clinical application of genetic diagnostic technologies. Lessons from cystic fibrosis. JAMA 270, 2948–2954 (1993).
Harris, R. Genetic counselling and testing in Europe. J. R. Coll. Physicians Lond. 32, 335–338 (1998).
Andrews, L.B., Fullarton, J.E., Holtzman, N.A. & Motulsky A.G. Personnel issues in human genetics. in Assessing Genetic Risks: Implications for Health and Social Policy 202–233 (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1994).
Kenen, R.H. & Smith, A.C.M. Genetic counseling for the next 25 years: models for the future. J. Genet. Counsel. 4, 115–124 (1995).
Skirton, H., Barnes, C., Curtis, G. & Walford-Moore, J. The role and practice of the genetic nurse: report of the AGNC Working Party. J. Med. Genet. 34, 141–147 (1997).
Skirton, H. et al. Recommendations for education and training of genetic nurses and counsellors in the United Kingdom. J. Med. Genet. 35, 410–412 (1998).
Farnish, S. A developing role in genetic counselling. J. Med. Genet. 25, 392–395 (1988).
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C. Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross cultural comparisons among 18 nations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46, 1200–1213 (1990).
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C. Moral reasoning among medical geneticists in eighteen nations. Theor. Med. 10, 123–138 (1989).
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C. Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection: a survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Soc. Sci. Med. 46, 255–273 (1998).
Mao, X. & Wertz, D.C. China's genetic services providers' attitudes towards several ethical issues: a cross-cultural survey. Clin. Genet. 52, 100–109 (1997).
Harper, P.S. Genetic counselling: an introduction. in Practical Genetic Counselling 3–17 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1993).
Clarke, A. Is non-directive genetic counseling possible? Lancet 338, 998–1001 (1991).
Bernhardt, B.A. Empirical evidence that genetic counseling is directive: where do we go from here? Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 17–20 (1997).
Murray, T.H. Prenatal testing and the quest for the perfect child. in The Worth of a Child 115–141 (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1996).
Clarke, A.J. The process of genetic counseling: beyond non-directiveness. in Genetics Society and Clinical Practice 179–200 (Bios Scientific Publishers, Oxford, 1997).
Wertz, D.C., Sorenson, J.R. & Heeren, T. Clients' interpretation of risks provided in genetic counseling. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 39, 253–264 (1986).
Penchaszadeh, V.B. & Beiguelman, B. Medical genetics services in Latin America: report of a meeting of experts. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 3, 409–420 (1998).
Marteau, T.M. et al. Counselling following diagnosis of fetal abnormality: a comparison between German, Portuguese and UK geneticists. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2, 96–102 (1994).
Ad hoc Committee on Genetic Counseling. Genetic counseling. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 27, 240–242 (1975).
Kessler, S. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IX. Teaching and counseling. J. Genet. Counsel. 6, 287–295 (1997).
Kessler, S. Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. X. Advanced counseling techniques. J. Genet. Counsel. 6, 379–392 (1997).
Djurdjinovic, L. Psychosocial counseling. in A Guide to Genetic Counseling 127–170 (Wiley & Liss, New York, 1998).
Matloff, E.T. Practice variability in prenatal genetic counseling. J. Genet. Counsel. 3, 215–232 (1994).
Smurl, J.F. & Weaver, D.D. Presymptomatic testing for Huntington chorea: guidelines for moral and social accountability. Am. J. Med. Genet. 26, 247–257 (1987).
American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors & American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 1233–1241 (1995).
Clarke, A.J. The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society. J. Med. Genet. 31, 785–797 (1994).
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C. Attitudes of genetic counselors: a multinational survey. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 42, 592–600 (1988).
Marymee, K. et al. Development of the critical elements of genetic evaluation and genetic counseling for genetics professionals and perinatologists in Washington state. J. Genet. Counsel. 7, 133–166 (1998).
Fine, B.A., Baker, D.L. & Fiddler, M. Practice-based competencies for accreditation of and training in graduate programs in genetic counseling. J. Genet. Counsel. 5, 113–121 (1996).
Sorenson, J.R. What we still don't know about genetic screening and counseling. in Gene Mapping: Using Law and Ethics as Guides (eds Annas, G.J. & Elias, S.) 203–214 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992).
Michie, S. & Marteau, T.M. Genetic counselling: some issues of theory and practice. in The Troubled Helix (eds Marteau, T.M. & Richards, M.) 104–122 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
Sorenson, J.R., Swazy, J.P. & Scotch, N.A. Medical genetics and genetic counseling. in Reproductive Pasts Reproductive Futures: Genetic Counseling and Its Effectiveness. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, XVII (4) 131–144 (Allan R. Liss, New York, 1981).
Kessler, S. Current psychological issues in genetic counseling. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 11, 5–18 (1990).
Michie, S., Bron, F., Bobrow, M. & Marteau, T.M. Non-directiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 40–47 (1997).
Lowther, G.W. & Whittle, M.J. Prenatal diagnosis in the United Kingdom—an overview. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 5 (suppl. 1), 84–89 (1997).
Marteau, T.M., Drake, H. & Bobrow, M. Counseling following diagnosis of a fetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists and genetic nurses. J. Med. Genet. 31, 864–867 (1994).
Press, N.A. & Browner, C.H. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc. Sci. Med. 45, 979–989 (1997).
Bernhardt, B.A. et al. Prenatal genetic testing: content of discussions between obstetric providers and pregnant women. Obstet. Gynecol. 91, 648–655 (1998).
Caplan, A. Neutrality is not morality: the ethics of genetic counseling. in Prescribing Our Future: Ethical Challenges in Genetics Counseling 149–165 (Aldine de Gruyter, New York,1993).
Press, N.A. & Browner, C.H. Collective fictions: similarities in reasons for accepting maternal serum α-fetoprotein screening among women of diverse ethnic and social class backgrounds. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 8, 97–106 (1993).
Marteau, T.M., Kidd, J. & Plenicar, M. Obstetricians presenting amniocentesis to pregnant women: practice observed. J. Reprod. Infant Psych. 11, 3–10 (1993).
Holtzman, N.A., Murphy, P.D., Watson, M.S. & Barr, P.A. Predictive genetic testing: from research to clinical practice. Science 278, 602–605 (1997).
Karanjawala, Z.E. & Collins, F.S. Genetics in the context of medical practice. JAMA 280, 1533–1544 (1998).
Collins, F.S. BRCA1-lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. N. Engl. J. Med. 334, 186–188 (1996).
The American Society of Clinical Oncology. Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, 1730–1736 (1996).
Calzone, K.A. Genetic predisposition testing: clinical implications for oncology nurses. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 24, 712–718 (1997).
Kenen, R.H. Opportunities and impediments for a consolidating and expanding profession: genetic counseling in the United States. Soc. Sci. Med. 45, 1377–1386 (1997).
Wertz, D.C. Society and the not-so-new genetics: what are we afraid of? Some future predictions from a social scientist. J. Contemp. Health Law Policy 13, 299–346 (1997).
Hofman, K.J. et al. Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests. Acad. Med. 68, 625–631 (1993).
Giardiello, F.M. et al. The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 869–870 (1997).
Hunter, A., Wright, P., Cappelli, M., Kasaboski, A. & Surh, L. Physician knowledge and attitudes towards molecular genetic (DNA) testing of their patients. Clin. Genet. 53, 447–455 (1998).
Holtzman, N.A. & Hilgartner, S. Appendix 3. State of the art of genetic testing in the United States: survey of biotechnology companies and nonprofit clinical laboratories and interviews of selected organizations. in Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States. Final Report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing created by the NIH-DOE Working Group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Human Genome Research (eds Holtzman, N.A. & Watson, M.S.) (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 1997).
Meissen, G.J. et al. Predictive testing for Huntington's disease with use of linked DNA marker. N. Engl. J. Med. 318, 535–542 (1988).
Wertz, D.C. & Fletcher, J.C. Laboratory policies and practices for the genetic testing of children: a survey of the Helix network. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 1163–1168 (1997).
Bernhardt, B.A. & Pyeritz, R.E. The economics of clinical genetics services. III. Cognitive genetics services are not self-supporting. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 44, 288–293 (1989).
Bernhardt, B.A., Tumpson, J.E. & Pyertiz, R.E. The economics of clinical genetics services. IV. Fincancial impact of outpatient genetic services on an academic institution. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 50, 84–91 (1992).
Loeben, G.L., Marteau, T.M. & Wilfond, B.S. Mixed messages: presentation of information in cystic fibrosis screening pamphlets. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 1181–1189 (1998).
Lerman, C. et al. BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: a prospective study of patient decision-making and outcomes. JAMA 275, 1885–1892 (1996).
Morrison, P.J. Genetic testing and insurance in the United Kingdom. Clin. Genet. 54, 375–379 (1998).
Rothenberg, K.H. Genetic discrimination and health insurance: a call for legislative action. J. Am. Med. Womens Assoc. 52, 43–44 (1997).
Hughes, H.E., Alderman, J.K., Krawczak, M. & Rogers, C. Contracting for clinical genetics services: the Welsh model. J. Med. Genet. 35, 309–313 (1998).
Annas, G. Generic consent for genetic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 1024 (1994).
Marteau, T.M. Communicating genetic information. Br. Med. Bull. (in press).
Scanlon, C. Management of genetic information: professional and ethical challenges in nursing. Crit. Care Nurse 16, 9–101 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Bernhardt, L. Biesecker, A. McInerney and F. Collins for their thoughtful input into early drafts this manuscript and our anonymous reviewers for constructive advice. T.M.M. is supported by the Wellcome Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowles Biesecker, B., Marteau, T. The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective. Nat Genet 22, 133–137 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/9641
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/9641
This article is cited by
-
Training Genetic Counsellors to Deliver an Innovative Therapeutic Intervention: their Views and Experience of Facilitating Multi‐Family Discussion Groups
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2017)
-
Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies
Nature Genetics (2013)
-
Ethical and Professional Challenges of Genetic Counseling – the Case of Austria
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2013)
-
Health and lifestyle behaviors among persons at risk of Lynch syndrome
Cancer Causes & Control (2010)
-
Death Anxiety and Symbolic Immortality in Relatives at Risk for Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy Type I (FAP I, ATTR V30M)
Journal of Genetic Counseling (2010)