In a culmination of previous trends, this year's ranking of academic spinouts on the basis of venture capital A rounds in 2016 resulted in a list exclusively of firms based in the United States. Recognizing that innovation is global, we have also listed in Table 1 two top-capitalized startups from Europe and Asia. Overall, US biopharma startups dwarf firms from other areas in terms of capitalization and number (Fig. 1); Ireland and the UK are punching above their weight; European companies continue to be comparatively undercapitalized. Those few biotech firms started in China were funded exceptionally well (Table 2).
Change history
12 January 2017
In the version of this article initially published, in Table 1, first row of Scientific Founders, William A. Frazier's affiliation was given as Washington State University; the correct affiliation is Washington University, St. Louis. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huggett, B. Innovative academic startups 2016. Nat Biotechnol 35, 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3760
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3760
This article is cited by
-
Erratum: Innovative academic startups 2016
Nature Biotechnology (2017)