Abstract
Theropod dinosaurs were the dominant predators in most Mesozoic era terrestrial ecosystems1. Early theropod evolution is currently interpreted as the diversification of various carnivorous and cursorial taxa, whereas the acquisition of herbivorism, together with the secondary loss of cursorial adaptations, occurred much later among advanced coelurosaurian theropods1,2. A new, bizarre herbivorous basal tetanuran from the Upper Jurassic of Chile challenges this conception. The new dinosaur was discovered at Aysén, a fossil locality in the Upper Jurassic Toqui Formation of southern Chile (General Carrera Lake)3,4. The site yielded abundant and exquisitely preserved three-dimensional skeletons of small archosaurs. Several articulated individuals of Chilesaurus at different ontogenetic stages have been collected, as well as less abundant basal crocodyliforms, and fragmentary remains of sauropod dinosaurs (diplodocids and titanosaurians).
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Theropoda Marsh, 1881
Tetanurae Gauthier, 1986
Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov.
Etymology. In reference to Chile, and honoring Diego Suárez, who at the age of 7, discovered the first bone remains in the Toqui Formation.
Holotype. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Chile (SNGM)-1935 consists of a nearly complete, articulated skeleton, approximately 1.6 m long (Fig. 1, Supplementary Information and Extended Data Fig. 1). Holotype specimen was skeletally immature at the time of its death, as evidenced by the incomplete fusion of neurocentral sutures. This ontogenetic inference agrees with the size of the holotype, which represents 50% the length of the larger specimen SNGM-1888 (ref. 3).
Paratypes. Postcranial skeletons of four individuals, corresponding to different ontogenetic stages, ranging approximately from 1.2 to 3.2 m in total length (Extended Data Table 1). Several specimens referred to as indeterminate theropods and tetanurans previously3 are here referred to as Chilesaurus diegosuarezi.
Locality and horizon. Central Patagonian Cordillera, Aysén (Chile; approximately 46° S); Toqui Formation3,4, Tithonian, latest Jurassic.
Diagnosis. Chilesaurus differs from other dinosaurs in the following combination of autapomorphies: premaxilla short and deep, with prominent plate-like postnarial process; teeth leaf-shaped, being finely denticulate only on the crown apex of erupting teeth; coracoid subquadrangular in side view and with transversely thick margins; manual digit II with short pre-ungual phalanges; manual digit III atrophied; iliac blade with posterodorsal prominence; ischiadic peduncle of ilium robust; supracetabular crest absent; pubis fully retroverted; pubic shaft rod-like and distally unexpanded; femoral mediodistal crest absent; tibia without fibular crest. In addition, Chilesaurus shows the following unique combination of characters: dentary deeper anteriorly than posteriorly; cervicals with septate and paired pleurocoels; pubic apron transversely narrow; ischia connected through a proximodistally extended medial lamina (‘ischial apron’); femoral greater trochanter anteroposteriorly expanded, astragalar ascending process lower than astragalar body; calcaneum subtriangular in distal view; metatarsal I robust, elongate, and proximally compressed transversely; metatarsal II transversely wider than the other metatarsals; pedal digit I large.
Isolated skull material (including premaxilla, maxillae, frontals, postorbital, squamosal, basicranium, ectopterygoid and dentary; Extended Data Fig. 2), suggests a proportionally small head for Chilesaurus. The premaxilla is short and deep, with a rugose rostral margin that suggests a ramphotheca (Fig. 2). Frontals are elongate and narrow and participate extensively in the orbital margin. The basisphenoidal recess is deep. The dentary is short and deep, with a downturned symphyseal region but a straight alveolar margin. Dentary teeth are tall, leaf-shaped, and procumbent, with small serrations restricted to the crown apex (Fig. 2).
Cervical vertebrae are long and low, forming a slender neck. Cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae possess a pair of septate pleurocoels, which are absent posterior to the pectoral region (Fig. 1g). ‘Pectoral’ vertebrae bear prominent hypapophyses.
The scapular blade (Extended Data Fig. 3) is elongate and slightly anteroposteriorly expanded distally, as in basal averostrans5. The coracoid is subquadrangular and lacks theropod characteristics such as the posteroventral process and biceps tuberosity1. It is notably thick transversely, contrasting with the delicate anterodorsal and dorsal margins of most dinosaurs. The limb bones are stout, as in sauropodomorphs, and forelimb length is 56% that of hind limbs. The humerus is proximodistally short and transversely wide (Extended Data Fig. 3). The single proximal carpal is large, with a transversely convex proximal articular surface. Metacarpals I–III are present, but only manual digits I and II are well developed (Fig. 1d–f). Metacarpal I is stout, and phalanx 1-I is short and strongly twisted along its main axis, as in basal sauropodomorphs6. The ungual of digit I is shorter than metacarpal II and less curved than most basal tetanurans5,7. Metacarpal II is the longest, and its digit presents strongly shortened pre-ungual phalanges, as in some ceratosaurians8. Metacarpal III is much more slender than in basal theropods, and its digit comprises a single minute phalanx.
The ilium is dolichoiliac, typical for Theropoda1 (Fig. 1b). The pubic pedicle is elongate (as in sauropods, ornithischians and therizinosaurs2,9), and the ischiadic peduncle is bulbous, as in ornithischians and alvarezsaurid coelurosaurs10. A prominent supratrochanteric process is present on the posterodorsal corner of the ilium, similar to those of sauropods, therizinosaurs, paravians, and some ornithischians11,12,13. The acetabular roof is transversely narrow and a supracetabular crest is absent, as occurs in derived coelurosaurs and ornithopods1,11,13. The pubis (Fig. 1b, c) closely resembles that of basal ornithischians, therizinosaurs and dromaeosaurid paravians in being fully retroverted, with a reduced proximal end bearing a posteriorly open obturator notch1,2. The pubic apron is transversely narrow and the pubis has a rod-like shaft. It is distally unexpanded with a rounded contour, sharply contrasting with the prominent distal ‘foot’ of other theropods1. The ischium (Fig. 1a, b) is proximally expanded and lacks an obturator process. Notably, both ischia are connected through a proximodistally extended medial lamina (ischial apron), a feature reported in some megalosauroids14.
The femur is robust (Extended Data Fig. 4). The greater trochanter is anteroposteriorly expanded, similar to coelurosaurs. The anterior trochanter is wing-like and proximally projected, and the fourth trochanter is semicircular. The distal third of the femur resembles sauropodomorphs in that it lacks distinctive theropod features, such as an anteromedial elliptical muscle scar, a mediodistal crest and its associated medial adductor fossa. The cnemial crest of tibia (Extended Data Fig. 4) is rounded in lateral view, as in basal sauropodomorphs and basal ornithischians, and differs from the subtriangular crest present in most basal theropods1,15. As in sauropodomorphs, and unlike most theropods, the proximal end of the tibia lacks a fibular crest1. Like theropods, the distal end of the tibia is anteroposteriorly compressed with a laterally extending malleolus, more transversely expanded than in coelophysoids, but less than in tetanurans1. The fibula lacks a proximomedial pocket and iliofibular tubercle. The tarsus (Fig. 1k–m) resembles basal saurischians16. The astragalar ascending process is low and broad, unlike tetanurans, in which it is laminar, tall, and transversely wide1,6,17. The proximal astragalar surface possesses a deep, well-defined basin posterior to the ascending process, as in basal dinosaurs. As in early saurischians (for example, Herrerasaurus, basal sauropodomorphs), the calcaneum of Chilesaurus is transversely wide and subtriangular in distal view, rather than rectangular and disc-shaped as in theropods1,16,17. The foot is wide and proximodistally short (Fig. 1h–j). The proximal half of metatarsal I is transversely compressed but anteroposteriorly expanded, unlike most theropods, in which it tapers proximally. Metatarsal I of Chilesaurus represents more than 50% of the length of metatarsal II, in contrast with most other theropods (25–33%)1,17. Metatarsal III is the longest, but metatarsal II is the thickest, as in basal sauropodomorphs. Digit I is large, only slightly shorter than digit II, approaching the tetradactyl condition of early sauropodomorphs, ornithischians18 and derived therizinosaurs2.
The bizarre anatomy of Chilesaurus raises interesting questions about its phylogenetic relationships. We scored Chilesaurus into four different integrative archosauriform, theropod and sauropodomorph data sets9,19,20,21. Remarkably, all these analyses placed Chilesaurus as a member of Theropoda, near the origin of tetanurans5 (Fig. 3a), dismissing conceivable positions near Therizinosauria, Sauropodomorpha or Ornithischia. The theropodan position of Chilesaurus is supported by pleurocoels in cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae; hypapophyses on ‘pectoral’ vertebrae; preacetabular process of ilium dorsoventrally expanded; femoral fourth trochanter semicircular; and tibia distally expanded and with lateral malleolus extending strongly laterally. Tetanuran affinities are supported by scapular blade elongate and strap-like; distal carpal semilunate; and manual digit III reduced (Supplementary Information). For a basal tetanuran, Chilesaurus possesses a number of surprisingly plesiomorphic traits on the hindlimbs, especially in the ankle and foot, which resemble basal sauropodomorphs7,9,12. These features are here considered as secondary reversals that might be related to a less-cursorial mode of locomotion. Furthermore, derived features of the dentary and teeth shared by Chilesaurus, sauropodomorphs and therizinosaurs are interpreted as homoplasies related to herbivorous habits22,23,24,25. In this context, pubic retroversion of Chilesaurus may be related to an increased gut capacity for processing plant material25.
The discovery of Chilesaurus lends support to the interpretation22,23 that dietary diversification towards herbivory was more commonplace among basal theropods than previously thought. Independent evolution of herbivory has been recognized for several major coelurosaurian subclades23, but for just a single probable example outside Coelurosauria (that is, the toothless ceratosaurian Limusaurus26,27). Chilesaurus expands the list of non-coelurosaurian theropods that shifted their diet from carnivore to herbivore.
Chilesaurus represents an extreme case of mosaic evolution among dinosaurs, owing to the presence of dental, cranial and postcranial features that are homoplastic with multiple disparate groups. Using quantitative morphospace analysis, we explored morphospace occupation of different skeletal regions in Chilesaurus with respect to a variety of avian and non-avian theropods. This shows that Chilesaurus has a ceratosaur-like axial skeleton, a ‘basal tetanuran’ forelimb and scapular girdle, a coelurosaur-like pelvis, and a tetanuran-like hindlimb (Fig. 3b–d and Extended Data Fig. 5). General ankle and foot construction does not group with any theropod clade, probably as a result of the characters shared by Chilesaurus, sauropodomorphs and herrerasaurids.
Chilesaurus is the numerically dominant taxon in the Aysén tetrapod fossil assemblage, and represents an unusual case of a theropod having the palaeoecological role of a preeminent small-to-medium sized herbivore in a Jurassic ecosystem. This is in sharp contrast with other Late Jurassic dinosaur assemblages (for example, Tendaguru and Morrison formations11,27), in which ornithischian dinosaurs are the most abundant small-to-medium sized herbivores. Available evidence indicates that Chilesaurus is a unique dinosaur lineage known only from southern South America, suggesting an outstanding case of endemism among otherwise relatively cosmopolitan worldwide Jurassic dinosaur faunas28.
Chilesaurus illustrates how much relevant data on the early diversification of major dinosaur clades remain unknown. It also provides an important cautionary benchmark in our attempts to gain a reliable view of the overall evolutionary history of Dinosauria.
Change history
17 June 2015
Minor changes were made to author affiliations.
References
Rauhut, O. W. M. The interrelationships and evolution of basal theropod dinosaurs. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 69, 1–213 (2003)
Paul, G. S. The segnosaurian dinosaurs: relics of the prosauropod–ornithischian transition? J. Vert. Paleont. 4 507–515 (1984)
Salgado, L., De La Cruz, R., Suárez, M., Gasparini, Z. & Fernández, M. First Late Jurassic dinosaur bones from Chile. J. Vert. Paleont. 28 529–534 (2008)
De la Cruz, R. & Suárez, M. Geología del área de Puerto Guadal-Puerto Sánchez, región de Aisén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo, escala 1:100.000 [in Spanish]. Carta Geológica de Chile 95, 1–117 (2006)
Madsen, J. H. Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Utah Geol. Min. Surv. Bull. 109, 1–163 (1976)
Martinez, R. N. et al. A basal dinosaur from the dawn of the Dinosaur Era in Southwestern Pangaea. Science 331 206–210 (2011)
Lautenschlager, S. Morphological and functional diversity in therizinosaur claws and the implications for theropod claw evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281 1471–1473 (2014)
Bonaparte, J. F. The Gondwanan theropod families Abelisauridae and Noasauridae. Hist. Biol. 5 1–25 (1991)
Otero, A. & Pol, D. Postcranial anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Mussaurus patagonicus (Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha). J. Vert. Paleont. 33 1138–1168 (2013)
Novas, F. E. Alvarezsauridae, Cretaceous basal birds from Patagonia and Mongolia. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 39, 675–702 (1996)
Weishampel, D. BDodson, P., Osmólska, H., & Hilton, R. P. The Dinosauria 2nd edn (Univ. of California Press, 2004)
Yates, A. M. A new species of the primitive dinosaur Thecodontosaurus (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) and its implications for the systematics of early dinosaurs. J. Syst. Palaeontology 1 1–42 (2003)
Hutchinson, J. R. The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissueson the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. London 131 123–168 (2001)
Sadleir, R., Barrett, P. M. & Powell, H. P. The anatomy and systematics of Eustreptospondylus oxoniensis, a theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Oxfordshire, England. Mon. Palaeont. Soc. London 160, 1–82 (2008)
Novas, F. E. Dinosaur monophyly. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 16 723–741 (1996)
Novas, F. E. The tibia and tarsus in Herrerasauridae (Dinosauria, incertae sedis) and the origin and evolution of the dinosaurian tarsus. J. Paleontol. 63, 677–690 (1989)
Zanno, L. E. Osteology of Falcarius utahensis: characterizing the anatomy of basal therizinosaurs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 158 196–230 (2010)
Galton, P. M. The ornithischian dinosaur Hypsilophodon from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight. Bull. Brit. Mus. Geol. London 25, 1–152 (1974)
Smith, N. D. et al. Megaraptor (Dinosauria: Tetanurae) in Australia; evidence for faunal interchange between eastern and western Gondwana during the Early Cretaceous. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275 2085–2093 (2008)
Nesbitt, S. J. et al. A complete skeleton of a Late Triassic saurischian and the early evolution of dinosaurs. Science 326 1530–1533 (2009)
Carrano, M. T., Benson, R. B. J. & Sampson, S. D. The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Syst. Paleont. 10 211–300 (2012)
Zanno, L. E., Gillette, D. D., Albright, L. B. & Titus, A. L. A new North American therizinosaurid and the role of herbivory in “predatory” dinosaur evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276 3505–3511 (2009)
Zanno, L. E. & Makovicky, P. J. Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 232–237 (2011)
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. in Biomechanics and Evolution (eds Rayner, J. M. V. & Wootton, R. J.) 161–181 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991)
Barrett, D. P. The diet of ostrich dinosaurs (Theropoda: Ornithomimosauria). Palaeontology 48 347–358 (2005)
Xu, X. et al. A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies. Nature 459 940–944 (2009)
Barrett, P. M. Paleobiology of herbivorous dinosaurs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42 207–230 (2014)
Ezcurra, M. D. & Agnolín, F. L. A new global palaeobiogeographical model for the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary. Syst. Biol. 61 553–566 (2012)
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Barrett, A. Milner and R. Butler for comments on early versions of this manuscript. We are grateful to C. Alsina, M. Milani, R. Stoll and M. Aranciaga for field assistance and technical preparation of Chilesaurus specimens. G. Lio executed the silhouette of Chilesaurus in Fig. 1. C. Burke offered support to conduct fieldwork and technical preparation of the specimens. We are indebted to the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2010-066 to F.E.N.) and the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (no. 1121140 and 1030162 to M.S.) for continuing financial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.E.N., L.S., M.S., F.L.A., M.D.E., N.R.C., A.O.V. and D.R.-R. designed the study, collected data, performed the comparative and analytical work, and wrote the paper. R.d.l.C. and M.P.I. collected data and contributed to the writing and discussion.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Data have been deposited in ZooBank under Life Science Identifier (LSID) http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B6DE8C7-C78D-48C0-B818-65C454AEFB58.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Holotype of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov. (SNGM-1935) as it was found in the field.
Cd, caudal vertebrae; Cv, cervical vertebrae; Dv, dorsal vertebrae; Lf, left forelimb; Lfem, left femur; Lsc, left scapulocoracoid; Ltib, left tibia; Rf, right forelimb; Sk, skull.
Extended Data Figure 2 Selected skull bones of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov. (SNGM-1935; holotype).
a, Right frontal in dorsal view; b, right postorbital in lateral view; c, incomplete right (?) maxilla in lateral view; d, right dentary in medial view. al, alveolus; ao, antorbital opening; or, orbital rim; t, teeth; tf, lower temporal fossa rim.
Extended Data Figure 3 Scapular girdle and selected forelimb bones of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov. a,
b, Left scapula and coracoid (SNGM-1938) in lateral (a) and posterior (b) views. c, Left humerus (SNGM-1938) in anterior view; d, left radius (SNGM-1935, holotype) in lateral view; and e, left ulna (SNGM-1935, holotype) in lateral view. cf, coracoid foramen; dp, deltopectoral crest; gl, glenoid cavity; ol, olecranon process.
Extended Data Figure 4 Selected hindlimb elements of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov. a,
b, Right femur (SNGM-1935) in anterior (a) and lateral (b) views. c–e, Articulated right tibia and fibula (SNGM-1935) in posterior (c), medial (d) and proximal (e) views. at, anterior trochanter; cn, cnemial crest; f, fibula; fh, femoral head, 4t, fourth trochanter; gt, greater trochanter, ic, inner condyle; oc, outer condyle; t, tibia; tfc, tibiofibular crest.
Extended Data Figure 5 Bivariate plots showing the results of the morphospace occupation analysis of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov. based on characters of different regions of the skeleton, taken from the modified data matrix and the first and second axes of the principal coordinate analysis.
a–d, Bivariate plots using all the characters (a), cranial characters (b), hindlimb zeugopodium and stylopodium characters (c), and tarsal and pedal characters (d). The convex hulls represent different dinosauriform groups rather than statistically distinct clusters. Light grey polygon, non-neotheropod dinosauriforms; blue polygon, non-averostran neotheropods; green polygon, ceratosaurs; pink polygon, megalosauroids; dark grey polygon, allosauroids; light blue polygon, coelurosaurs; red dot, Chilesaurus.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures and additional references, which are divided into the following sections: Occurrence, age, and preservation of the holotype and referred specimens of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov.; Phylogenetic analyses; and Morphospace analysis. (PDF 3286 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novas, F., Salgado, L., Suárez, M. et al. An enigmatic plant-eating theropod from the Late Jurassic period of Chile. Nature 522, 331–334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14307
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14307
This article is cited by
-
Escape behaviors in prey and the evolution of pennaceous plumage in dinosaurs
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
New transitional fossil from late Jurassic of Chile sheds light on the origin of modern crocodiles
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Noasaurids are a component of the Australian ‘mid’-Cretaceous theropod fauna
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Probable basal allosauroid from the early Middle Jurassic Cañadón Asfalto Formation of Argentina highlights phylogenetic uncertainty in tetanuran theropod dinosaurs
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Halszkaraptor escuilliei and the evolution of the paravian bauplan
Scientific Reports (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.