Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Pawar et al. reply

Nature volume 493, pages E2–E3 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

replying to H. C. Giacomini, B. Shuter, D. T. de Kerckhove & P. A. Abrams Nature 493, 10.1038/nature11829 (2012)

Current studies assume that per-capita consumption rates always scale with body mass to an exponent of 0.75. We showed that, contrary to this assumption, consumption rates scale sublinearly (exponent of approximately 0.85) when organisms forage in two dimensions (2D), and superlinearly (exponent of approximately 1.06) when they forage in 3D1. Giacomini et al. argue that the superlinear scaling in 3D interactions we observed cannot be reconciled with life-history theory for maximal body size2. Consequently, they search for biases in our study that might cause this superlinear scaling. However, their comments do not challenge our central result that consumption rates scale superlinearly in 3D, and significantly more steeply than in 2D. We propose instead that life-history theory may need revision to include interaction dimensionality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Effect of ontogeny on scaling of 3D per-capita consumption rates.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pawar, S., Dell, A. I. & Savage, V. M. Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths. Nature 486, 485–489 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giacomini, H. C., Shuter, B., de Kerckhove D. T & Abrams, P. A. Does consumption rate scale superlinearly? Nature 493, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11829 (2012)

  3. Savage, V. M. et al. Comment on ‘The illusion of invariant quantities in life histories’. Science 312, 198 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagy, K. A. Field metabolic rate and food requirement scaling in mammals and birds. Ecol. Monogr. 57, 111–128 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison, J. F., Kaiser, A. & VandenBrooks, J. M. Atmospheric oxygen level and the evolution of insect body size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 1937–1946 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnov, E. L. Evolution of mammal life histories. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 521–535 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charnov, E. L. & Gillooly, J. F. Size and temperature in the evolution of fish life histories. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 494–497 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quince, C., Abrams, P., a, Shuter, B. J. & Lester, N. P. Biphasic growth in fish I: theoretical foundations. J. Theor. Biol. 254, 197–206 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartvig, M., Andersen, K. H. & Beyer, J. E. Food web framework for size-structured populations. J. Theor. Biol. 272, 113–122 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Samraat Pawar & Anthony I. Dell

    Present address: Present addresses: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA (S.P.); Systemic Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany (A.I.D.),

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomathematics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1766, California, USA

    Samraat Pawar, Anthony I. Dell &  Van M. Savage

  2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, California, USA

    Van M. Savage

  3. Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, Mexico 87501, New, USA

    Van M. Savage

Authors
  1. Samraat Pawar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony I. Dell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Van M. Savage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samraat Pawar.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pawar, S., Dell, A. & Van M. Savage Pawar et al. reply. Nature 493, E2–E3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11830

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11830

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene