Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Are trends in the proportions of non-medically indicated inductions different by Medicaid status?

Journal of Perinatology volume 35, pages 353–356 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To determine whether Medicaid status influenced the effect of a quality improvement effort.

Study Design:

Using a data set consisting of the 2006 to 2010 vital statistics data linked with Medicaid status data, we identified non-medically indicated inductions between 36 0/7 and 38 6/7 weeks gestational age and compared rates of non-medically indicated inductions between women with Medicaid and all other payers. We also compared these rates in hospitals that did and did not participate in the Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative (OPQC).

Results:

A total of 232 935 births with gestational ages between 36 0/7 and 38 6/7 weeks were included in this study. In the sample, 32 371 births (13.9%) were non-medically indicated inductions. Overall, rates of non-medically indicated deliveries for all insurance types dropped over the course of the initiative. Interestingly, in OPQC participating hospitals, the Medicaid mothers’ rates of non-medically indicated inductions prior to 39 weeks were well below rates for other insurance types prior to the initiative. By the end of the initiative, rates for all insurance types had dropped significantly but non-medically indicated inductions<39 weeks rates dropped more dramatically in the non-Medicaid mothers, resulting in higher rates for Medicaid than for non-Medicaid mothers.

Conclusions:

Non-medically indicated deliveries decreased for women irrespective of Medicaid enrollment status. However, non-medically indicated delivery rates did not drop as sharply for women enrolled in Medicaid.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stranges E, Ryan K, Elixhauser A . Medicaid Hospitalizations, 2008. Agency for healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, 2011.

  2. Ohio Medicaid. Ohio Medicaid Mother Infants and Children Report. In: ODJFS (ed). Columbus, 2010.

  3. Kaiser Family Foundation. State medicaid coverage of perinatal services 2009 Nov 1 2009.

  4. 2013 Income guidelines for Ohioans: Healthy Start and Healthy Families. 2013. (Accessed May 30, 2013, available at http://jfs.ohio.gov/OHP/consumers/HSHF2013.stm.

  5. Quality Strategy. 2011. (Accessed June 24, 2013, available at http://www.healthtransformation.ohio.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=_PBdWCq2Yto%3D&tabid=70.).

  6. The Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative Writing Committee. A statewide initiative to reduce inappropriate scheduled births at 36 0/7 to 38 6/7 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202 (243): e1–e8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Ohio Perinatal Quality Collaborative 2013. (Accessed 05/30/13, 2013, available at https://opqc.net/resources/monthly-graphs.

  8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. State Quality Collabortives Chart http://www.acog.org/About_ACOG/ACOG_Departments/Government_Relations_and_Outreach/~/media/Departments/Government%20Relations%20and%20Outreach/StateQualCollabChart.pdf. 2014.

  9. California Maternal Quality Care Collabortivehttps://www.cmqcc.org/ 2014.

  10. Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y, Leveno KJ, Varner MW et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 111–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hibbard JU, Wilkins I, Sun L, Gregory K, Haberman S, Hoffman M et al. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births. JAMA 2010; 304: 419–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'Alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G . Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Important Information on HB 1983 and Less than 39 weeks. American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists. (Accessed June 24, 2013, available at http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Districts/District-XI/Important-Information-on-HB-1983-and-Less-than-39-Weeks.

  14. de Jongh BE, Locke R, Paul DA, Hoffman M . The differential effects of maternal age, race/ethnicity and insurance on neonatal intensive care unit admission rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012; 12: 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reichman NE, Schwartz-Soicher O . Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 32 e1–e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/tools/index.htm.

  17. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB . The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spong CY . Defining ‘term’ pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining ‘Term’ Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA 2013; 309: 2445–2446.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bailit JL . Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 269.e1–e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kendall M, Stuart A . The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Griffin, 1983; Vol 3: 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Childbirth Connection. Listening to Mothers III national survey and report 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Office of Medical Assistance, Columbus, OH, USA

    M Applegate & M Wiggins

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine and Center for Health Care Research and Policy, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    J L Bailit

Authors
  1. M Applegate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Wiggins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J L Bailit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J L Bailit.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Applegate, M., Wiggins, M. & Bailit, J. Are trends in the proportions of non-medically indicated inductions different by Medicaid status?. J Perinatol 35, 353–356 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.218

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.218

Search

Advanced search

Quick links